Shot Vision App Review
We Tried It

Shot Vision App Review

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Shot Vision App Review

There is a lot of cool gear in the golf equipment world that doesn’t always fit neatly into Most Wanted Tests or Buyer’s Guides. You still want to know how it performs. In our We Tried It series, we put gear to the test and let you know if it works as advertised.

What is Shot Vision?

We get countless requests to test Personal Launch Monitor apps to see if they live up to the hype. So we’re putting Shot Vision, a new app, to the test.

Shot Vision offers a free version with limited metrics to help you dial in your game. If you want to get the full experience, it will cost $6.99 a month or a one-time annual fee. Throughout that year, you can compete against other golfers within the app. It’s a great way to improve your game but, more importantly, gain as many banter points as possible against your mates. Whether it be a target competition, long drive or a skills challenge, you will have that competitive feeling.

The big question is: Does the app actually work?

And is it accurate?

Keep reading to find out.

Product Expert

Hi, I’m Harry. I am a professional golf equipment tester. (Yes, we exist.) I test a lot of things at MyGolfSpy and play professionally when I’m not checking and comparing specs on gloves, rangefinders, bags, ball retrievers, etc. You can call me the Senior Director of Product Testing here at MGS. You can also just call me Harry. That’s fine, too.

Shot Vision Launch Monitor App

Shot Vision is a personal launch monitor built into an application on your phone. This is a category that is growing rapidly within the golfing industry. Shot Vision offers multiple modes (at an up-charge) to help you dial in your game. For example, you can hit to targets, measure club gapping or combine targets and club gapping to hit the number the app suggests, on command. You can compete against anyone around the world.

If you want work on your game, no problem. Just like a high-end launch monitor, you can hit multiple shots and look at each one after your session. You can edit your session to throw out miss hits just like you can on Foresight. Each recorded session has a multitude of data metrics that show averages, angle of attack, dynamic loft, launch angle, ball speed, clubhead speed, carry and more. For an application that is relatively cheap, you get a ton of data to analyze just like you would with a high-end launch monitor.

It can be used indoors and outdoors. However, you must have good lighting for the indoor mode to work effectively.

Using Shot Vision

First things first. Read and follow the instructions to set up the range session. You must be within four feet of your phone and one to two feet back and to the right for the shot to record. The phone must be set up behind you. After speaking to the creators of Shot Vision, it became clear, they could have positioned it in front of you but the likelihood of having four feet of space on a range is very low. So they positioned the device behind you.

A huge upside is how easy the app is to navigate and interpret. The average golfer will have no problem understanding everything. Every mode within the app provides a score out of 100 to see how much improvement you need.

Does it Work?

The big question is: How accurate is the Shot Vision app compared to a top-of-the-range Foresight GC Quad?

Indoors

If you don’t have good lighting, the Shot Vision app loses accuracy. All metrics were off by 30 to 50 percent compared to the Foresight GC Quad on a regular basis. The app did have mis-reads but so do the top performers in the launch monitor world. However, the better the light, the more accurate the numbers. For consistency, I would advise against using the application indoors.

Outdoors

You must have good lighting for the device to work. If you are trying to capture data during the “golden hour,” you might get some readings that are completely off. The app might not pick up the shot at all. When you do have good lighting and the phone/app is positioned correctly, it spits out some good data similar to the Foresight GC Quad. It doesn’t do it every time but occasionally it’s right on the money.

Final Thoughts

Would I use this for my game?

Not yet.

I want to get the most accurate and consistent data. Yes, the Shot Vision app can get the numbers spot on sometimes but it’s not frequently enough for me to trust that data. For golfers who want to compete against their mate in another country or even up the road during lockdown, it’s fantastic and I would highly recommend it.

Shot Vision is only as good as the iPhone model you have. The older the phone, the less accurate it is. If you have the most updated iPhone and software update, the accuracy increases. When I performed this test, I made sure my software was the newest version for the best readings possible. I have an iPhone 11.

I have no doubt launch monitor applications like Shot Vision will be accurate in the future. When that day comes, you will see personal launch monitors catch up to the GC Quads of the world for a fraction of the price.

For You

For You

News
Jul 21, 2026
FootJoy Quietly Dropped A Budget Golf Shoe That Looks Nearly Identical To Its $225 Counterpart
Ryan Fox Fast Play Ryan Fox Fast Play
Instruction
Jul 21, 2026
Just Pull The Trigger! What You Can Learn From Ryan Fox’s Lightning-Fast Pace Of Play
News
Jul 21, 2026
11 Golf Phrases You Hear On TV But May Not Understand
Harry Nodwell

Harry Nodwell

Harry Nodwell

Harry is the Senior Director of Product Testing, overseeing the facility and delving into everything Soft Goods related. His job is to cut through all the marketing and inform you, the consumer, what the best products are. Whether it be shoes, bags or gloves Harry has your back. Harry recently turned professional after being a two time All-American in golf and soccer. When he's not on the course, Harry loves to spend time with his lovely wife Miranda and dog Puma. #TruthDigest

Harry Nodwell

Harry Nodwell

Harry Nodwell

Garmin R10 Golf Launch Monitor Review
May 19, 2023 | 21 Comments
MNML Golf Stand Bag Review
May 17, 2023 | 39 Comments
Bushnell Wingman GPS Speaker Review
May 10, 2023 | 13 Comments
Harry Nodwell

Harry Nodwell

Harry Nodwell

Driver Titleist TSI3 Fairway Taylormade M5
Driving Iron Titleist 505U Irons Srixon ZX5/ZX7
Wedges Titleist SM9 Putter Lab Golf Directed Force 2.1
Ball Titleist Pro V1 Left Dot  
Harry Nodwell

Harry Nodwell

Harry Nodwell





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Mike zsmitty

      5 years ago

      I have been using this for the last two weeks in my backyard, hitting into a net. I have nothing to compacompare it to, but it is helping. It picks up almost all my swings. I had been driving only about 210. Just getting back into golf. It was showing my swing speed at 89mph and the did match the simulator at Dick’s. Now I have watched some Mike Austin videos and others and am swinging at 105mph. At the course I am now hitting 240+ yards. The numbers have shown that my angle of attack is too high and this I am spinning the ball too much. So at least I know what to work on now. And for $7 a month, I am saving $18 a week on buckets.

      Reply

      Shrktank

      5 years ago

      Can this work with the Apple Watch. I have tried at the range and it is a bit of a pain to change the club each time and then to reset the phone up. Be nice for an Apple Watch interface which allowed club selection from the watch

      Reply

      Dave

      6 years ago

      I tried a one-month subscription as a test. At first it missed every other shot but after a bit of tweaking I got it working consistently. Getting the positioning just right is the key — be sure that you are hitting parallel to the camera and not at an angle and it should work fine. Night/Indoor mode is quite off (125 yards with a Driver!) but outdoors is a bit more accurate.

      Unfortunately while sometimes accurate, the readings are not always consistent. I can hit the same shot with the same club 10 times and the readings will not even be close together. Not good if you are trying to judge your club distances.

      So in a nutshell, it’s a fun toy but I wouldn’t used it if you are serious about your swing data. I wouldn’t be surprised if they get a lot of one month subscriptions that don’t get renewed.

      Reply

      OMFS88

      6 years ago

      Is Shot Vision a paid advertiser on MGS?

      Reply

      hsl

      6 years ago

      O have a three yet old swing caddie 2……it is within 1% on swing speed and 3% on yardage….when used against a trackman on the same swings……just not as much data….but alot less cheese!!!!!

      Reply

      Nakman

      6 years ago

      Maybe the real answer is for Foresight sports to come out with a simpler version that is less costly, or rental/lease options.

      Reply

      Mike Cox

      6 years ago

      Get A RAPPSADO!!

      Reply

      David Dulen

      6 years ago

      Hello Mike,
      How is the Rapsado working for you? I am getting ready to ether purchase the Rapsado or the SC300 like within the next few days here. I would like your input regarding the Rapsado.
      Thank you
      David D

      Reply

      pineneedlespro

      6 years ago

      Maybe other apps are worth trying such as:
      “Swing Index”
      “ES15”
      “Technique/Hudl”
      Have not tried these but searching out these to try.

      Reply

      Andrew Han

      6 years ago

      Do you know if GC or Foresight working on an app or is it most like a standalone equipment? I guess they see no threat to their business, but you seem to be very optimistic about it. How far out do you think?

      Reply

      JQ

      6 years ago

      I would’ve liked to see this compared to a $250-$500 launch monitor. A GCQuad at $11,000 is not realistic for most people’s home/range use. Of course, if the Shotvision is off 50-60 yards like the example shows, its of no use anyway. Good review.

      Reply

      Harry P.

      6 years ago

      Ordered a hitting net yesterday for winter practice and wanted a little more info than feel and Dr. Scholl’s so downloaded Shot Vision. Based on a review by Rick Shiels, it is pretty accurate for club speed, ball speed,& launch and high for spin. Is is also less accurate for the driver, probably because of the speed. If I need more info I have a top tracer range near me that only charges $9 for a large bucket of balls, so would never pay for a lauch monitor.

      Reply

      Luc Lacoursiere

      6 years ago

      Does this work if you are not hitting a ball?

      I’m thinking indoor use to track swing speed with the superspeed system. It would be a very cheap way to track swing speed.

      Reply

      Dick Arndt

      6 years ago

      I would love to have one, but the demonstrated data really tells me nothing. Which is accurate? Could it be the free one is really correct or are they both off by 50% off? Much more data needed to have any meaning.

      Reply

      Dan

      6 years ago

      I wonder it this is better if used with the new iPad/iPhone with LiDar capabilities? (Harry, if you. don’t use this as an excuse to upgrade and write off the cost you’re missing a golden opportunity!)
      If it is better on the iPhone 12 Pro, I could spend $1k on a new iPhone, or keep my iPhone 11 and save 6 Benjies by buying a Rapsodo? :-/

      Reply

      Will Dutton

      6 years ago

      This is exactly what I was thinking. The new lid at sensor could be a game changer

      Reply

      Michael

      6 years ago

      I’ve used this app once or twice, but couldn’t even get through a small bucket of balls before it quit working due to my phone overheating in the sun.
      Also, I heard it tell me that my ball speed was in the 138 range with a 7-iron, which I thought was kind of high, but didn’t really have anything to judge it off of…my 7-iron is usually in the 190 yard total distance range.

      Reply

      Glen

      6 years ago

      So basically….. a piece of crap

      Reply

      Mark M

      6 years ago

      Thanks for the continued testing of portable/affordable launch monitors. I’m sure they’ll become accurate and useful tools in the next 2-5 years.

      Feels like the leap to getting accurate club data along with ball data will come from a company outside of the Trackman/Foresight/Flightscope triumvirate. Seems they have a vested interest in making you spend top dollar to get the most accurate monitors with all the useful features. Where’s the motivation there? I’d be willing to bet that the first company that can bring to market something similar or better than the SkyTrak for $500 will make a killing.

      Reply

      Jimmy Mitchell

      6 years ago

      Is this available for android?

      Reply

      Harry Nodwell

      6 years ago

      Not yet but they’re working on making it compatible for andriod.

      Reply

      Greg Garner

      6 years ago

      I’m totally here for the race between this app and Rapsodo for who will support Android first (and best).

      Nicholas Tang

      6 years ago

      Agree with article. Also i feel like another factor is the model or how advanced your phone’s camera is. I had different results using it on an iPhone 11 pro compared to an iPhone 8.

      Reply

      Harry Nodwell

      6 years ago

      Nicholas, you are correct. The camera plays a huge factor in how accurate the data is. But mark my words that once technology becomes better, apps like Shot Vision will be close to the leaders in the launch monitor world. Just keep an eye on this app for the future

      Reply

      Dave Tutelman

      6 years ago

      I have a feeling that the SPEED of the camera is the key. The things that could make a big difference as a golf launch monitor would be:
      (1) Maximum frames per second.
      (2) Global shutter (as opposed to rolling shutter). This is very important.
      (3) Reliable resolution at speed.

      You’re absolutely right that this is amenable to technology. But it’s a cost and market consideration. For instance, what is the value of putting a high-frame-rate global shutter camera in a cell phone? It will cost SOMETHING, no matter how much the technology improves. Will the cell phone market pay for that? My guess is “no”, for at least 3-5 years and likely more.

      Dave Tutelman

      6 years ago

      That said, I can think of a possibility to speed up the appearance of the needed camera in a cell phone. History shows us that just one “killer app” for a technology will cause the technology to become VERY available and affordable. (I used to do technology forecasting for a living.) So what would be a killer app that needs a fast, accurate camera with a global shutter? It certainly isn’t a golf launch monitor, unless serious golf practice gets a lot more popular — A LOT more popular. I admit, I have no idea what the killer app might be. But if it happens, a much better golf launch monitor app would likely follow.

      claude

      6 years ago

      did you use the same club with both launch monitors and it looks like you used a 7 iron the results are no where near similar. Does not look like something I would trust.

      Reply

      Harry Nodwell

      6 years ago

      The numbers were with the same club at the same time

      Reply

      O2BGolfn

      6 years ago

      Harry, Just a thought . I wounder if you could use both monitors on the same swing to see how close the results are ?

      Anthony

      6 years ago

      It would have been nice to see more data posted to see how it stacked up overall. The article mentions that the app can get the numbers spot on sometimes and spit out some good data similar to GC Quad but then show a horrible comparison for a 7i. Appreciate the work you guys do but speaking for me, I’d like to be able to compare a larger data set to see how often it captured accurate numbers as well as how often the app got it wrong, and by how much. The one example shown leads readers to believe it’s wildly inaccurate.

      Reply

      John

      6 years ago

      What Anthony said! It’s super interesting and I appreciate you guys testing but was expecting way more

      Reply

      PeteT

      6 years ago

      Why more data? Pretty clear that it’s not ready for prime time when he wrote “All metrics were off by 30 to 50 percent compared to the Foresight GC Quad on a regular basis. “. That’s pretty clear.. You did get the point. and you are correct, that it is wildly inaccurate. (not trying to start a war, just pointing out the obvious).

      Reply

      CK

      6 years ago

      Do these companies know that 85% of cell phones are Android?

      Reply

      Harry Nodwell

      6 years ago

      Shot Vision are working on making it compatible for android very soon

      Reply

      tomi

      6 years ago

      wow, this was great news!

      Rick

      6 years ago

      They do,

      85% of those companies also have different hardware standards!! IPhone whatever version maybe 6 camera variants.. Android camera variants.??? Sure if you only purchase a Samsung phone on android.. but your Umidigi probably will be left out..

      Reply

      George

      6 years ago

      They know only apple people are dumb enough to pay for it.

      Reply

      bruce n.

      6 years ago

      great idea to use common phones ; but the data has to be more accurate for me to ” buy in”

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    News
    Jul 21, 2026
    FootJoy Quietly Dropped A Budget Golf Shoe That Looks Nearly Identical To Its $225 Counterpart
    Ryan Fox Fast Play Ryan Fox Fast Play
    Instruction
    Jul 21, 2026
    Just Pull The Trigger! What You Can Learn From Ryan Fox’s Lightning-Fast Pace Of Play
    News
    Jul 21, 2026
    11 Golf Phrases You Hear On TV But May Not Understand