MGS Tested: 2014 MOST WANTED – Fairway Wood (Distance Awards)
Fairway Woods

MGS Tested: 2014 MOST WANTED – Fairway Wood (Distance Awards)

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

MGS Tested: 2014 MOST WANTED – Fairway Wood (Distance Awards)

If there’s one thing I know for certain it’s that some of you guys are chomping at the bit to buy a new 3 Wood. I don’t blame you. I had all but given up on them until this test, now not only do I have a fairway wood in my bag, I’m thinking it might be time to go back to a 5 wood too.

To help you make the smart play (so you can play smart) we put 22 different fairway woods to the test (and that’s if you don’t count Pro/Tour models separately) to find out which were long, which were straight, and which were probably best avoided.

Some offer more distance while others offer more playability. Unfortunately some don’t offer anything better than what was out there 2+ years ago. Which is which? We’ll get to that, but first…

How We Tested 3 Woods

To minimize fatigue while still allowing for the necessary number of shots to be hit, each of the 22 clubs in our test was placed into 1 of 3 club groups. No 2 clubs from a single manufacturer were placed in the same group, otherwise group assignments were randomly drawn.

The order clubs were hit each day was also determined at random, but to ensure fairness and balance, the order was different for each tester, and we took steps to ensure that each club was hit near the beginning, middle, and end of each group.

All shots were hit from a fairway lie. We did not test from the tee or from the rough. Given the emergence of clubs like Callaway’s 2 Deep, PING’s Rapture, and TaylorMade’s Mini Driver, future fairway wood tests will almost certainly involve a tee component.

Each club group was hit over the course of 2 sessions by each each of our testers. In each session we collected 6 good shots per club from each tester (12 total – 6 shots * 2 sessions).

Rankings are based on relative performance against our control club which was also hit by each tester in each session.

Golfers were given adequate time to warm up. Once ready, golfers took 3 swings with each club before moving to the next club. After 9 swings testers were given a break. The process was repeated until 6 good shots were collected with each 3 Wood being tested in that particular session. Testers hit an average of 65 shots during each session.

2014-Most-Wanted-3-wood-40

Who and What is Missing

:: Titleist, as is almost always the case, once again declined to participate in this test.
:: Krank Golf also declined our invitation to participate.
:: Callaway was invited to send their Deep series woods, but did not provide them.
:: TaylorMade was given the opportunity to include Mini Driver, but did not provide them.
:: TaylorMade SLDR S did not exist at the time we sent our product requests.

So what is a 3 Wood Anyway?

Now that’s one hell of a good question. Let’s face it, the lines are blurry, if they even exist at all. So for the purposes of this test, to keep it simple, and provide the best fit possible for our testers, we defined a 3-wood as having between 13° and 16° of loft. We did ask that low lofted/strong 3 woods have the same length shaft as their more conventional 15° counterparts. As long is those conditions were met, we were more than happy to call it (whatever it is) a 3 wood. Golfers spend too much time worrying about the number stamped on the sole. We thought it was more important to hit balls.

Distance Re-Defined

In past tests we’ve taken the average of all shots collected to determine our distance rankings. We feel that this is too broad, so moving forward we’ve decided to consider distance a bit differently.

Our Most Wanted 3 Wood for Distance is the club that offers the greatest potential for distance on your best shots.

What that means is that forgiveness and accuracy have been largely removed from the equation. Instead of the entire shot pool, we looked at only the best shots hit by each tester with each club.

Which club produces the most distance when hit in the center… that’s what we look for in our Most Wanted 3 Wood for Distance.

2014-Most-Wanted-3-wood-5

The Rankings

distance-mwfw-1st

The appearance of the PING Rapture on top of this list shouldn’t come as a surprise to much of anyone. A $500 titanium fairway wood engineered for massive distance up against primarily steel faced woods offered at literally half the price. It’s a small wonder that anything came close.

Other than the distance (and ball speed), the amazing part of the PING Rapture story is that it’s so amazingly easy to hit. Granted, we probably shouldn’t expect anything different from PING, but given it’s relatively massive footprint we figured it would be too bulky to hit well off the deck. It wasn’t.

The PING Rapture is the “Most Wanted” 3Wood Distance Winner.

distance-mwfw-2nd

A clear favorite among our testers, Callaway’s Big Bertha offers up top tier distance with a shape and feel that most found just about perfect. Bertha was the longest of the steel faced fairways, and while not cheap, it doesn’t quite reach the Rapture levels either.

As you’ll see, the top of this list is littered with titanium-faced fairway woods, for the steel-faced Bertha to hit the board at #2 really speaks volumes about how long this club really is. As good as last season’s X Hot fairway was, we think Big Bertha easily represents Callaway’s best work in the standard  fairway wood category.

distance-mwfw-3rd

Like the PING Rapture the Tour Edge Exotics CB Pro features titanium face construction. Also like the Rapture, it’s $500. As you can see performance between the two is similar – you won’t be short with either. For the $500 crowd looking for a smaller footprint than the Rapture can offer, the CB Pro will no doubt deliver.

While we expect that Rapture would prove to be the better option of the tee, with its Slip Stream sole, the Tour Edge CB Pro may have some real advantages outside and out of deeper grass.

distance-mwfw-4th

Few if any fairway woods are trending hotter right now than Cobra’s BiO Cell and BiO Cell+, and we can certainly understand why.  BiO Cell joins Big Bertha as the only steel-faced product to crack the top 6. Some testers saw massive distance gains with this semi-surprise beast of a club (actually if you’re surprised, you probably haven’t been paying attention).

The + offers one of the most compact footprints of any fairway on the market today, while the larger size of the standard model should boost confidence for those who need it. If you’ve been waiting for the right time to give Cobra a try, that time is probably right freakin’ now. For you tight-asses traditionalists out there, I should probably mention that BiO Cell and BiO Cell+ both come in black.

distance-mwfw-5th

For those of you counting along at home the XCG7 is in fact Tour Edge’s 2nd fairway wood to crack our Top 5 for Distance. Like the CB Pro it’s a titanium-faced product, and like the CB Pro it’s long.

Some will no doubt complain about Tour Edge’s lack of adjustability in their fairway offerings, while others will talk about the smaller brand offering that trumps many big OEM offerings. If I were you, I’d focus on the 2nd part.

distance-mwfw-6th

That’s right, the Adams XTD is the 4th titanium-faced fairway product in our top 6. Shot for shot, XTD can hang with anything we tested, and while it might come at a premium price, the XTD more or less proves that Adams fairways can still hang with the best of them.

distance-mwfw-7th

Arguably the biggest surprise in our Top 10, the Cleveland 588 just feels right. It’s light, but largely controllable, and great fun to hit.

distance-mwfw-8th

While JetSpeed may be on the verge of being replaced by SLDR S, but those who choose to be the old model are going to get hella distance for a great price. The longer shaft might be hard for some to control, but those who can will reap the benefits.

distance-mwfw-9th

The VRS Covert 2.0 (and Tour)  Fairway offer the latest proof that Nike is inching closer to blowing the door of this golf thing. It’s going to happen one day, but in the meantime, enjoy conventionally good performance in an unconventional package.

distance-mwfw-10th

Rounding out the Top 10 is the TaylorMade SLDR. We’re well within the average range here, and what’s really interesting is that while our testers didn’t all hit SLDR bombs they way they hit Rapture and Bertha Bombs (some actually did), as the shot sample size increases, SLDR holds up better than most. We don’t think it’s the longest 3 wood on the market, but SLDR will most certainly play.

distance-mwfw-11thdistance-mwfw-12th

distance-mwfw-13thdistance-mwfw-14th

distance-mwfw-15thdistance-mwfw-16th

distance-mwfw-17thdistance-mwfw-18th

distance-mwfw-19thdistance-mwfw-20th

distance-mwfw-21stdistance-mwfw-22nd

Results by Swing Speed

As we usually do, we’ve broken down our list of top performers by swing speed. While there’s almost always some overlap, it’s far from unusual to find clubs that perform measurably better for higher, or lower swing speed golfers.

2014-Most-Wanted-3-wood-3

top-5-high-ss-banner1-1

distance-mwfw-hss-1st

The PING Rapture proved particularly long in the hands of our highest swing speed players. We’re talking about a 3 wood that some testers hit as long as they do their drivers, and they did it off the deck. This is simply a phenomenal offering. It’s basically everything we’ve come to expect from PING.

distance-mwfw-hss-2nd

Nearly as long as the Rapture in our higher swing speed players hands, the XTD brings massive distance in a more compact footprint. It’s pretty clear to us that the Rapture’s size isn’t an issue, but if it is to you, and you’ve got some juice in your swing, XTD  isn’t a bad way to go…not even a little bit.

distance-mwfw-hss-3rd

Surpirse! It’s another titanium offering. There’s got to be a lesson in that somewhere. We absolutely love the Tour Edge Exotics CB Pro. It offers traditional style, some new technology, and one hell of a stock shaft (Fujikura Speeder). As is often the case with Tour Edge; they’ve offered up the best alternative to the big brands.

distance-mwfw-hss-4th

I’m not saying that our slower swing speed players dragged the TaylorMade SLDR down, but… Pound for pound SLDR was again one of the favorites in our test, particularly among our higher swing speed players. While we think there are better options for slower swingers, amazingly the SLDR represents the budget option (comparatively speaking) for higher swing speed players.

distance-mwfw-hss-5th

Right behind SLDR, and I mean like right behind it is Callaway’s X2 Hot. Last year X Hot was the fairway story, and this year…well, Callaway hasn’t exactly lost a step. For Callaway fans, and fans of good fairway woods in general, this is an easy buy. Oh…and if you’re looking for Bertha, it’s a very close #6 on this list.

top-5-low-ss-banner1-1

distance-mwfw-lss-1st

While the XCG7 (Beta) driver was standout for higher swing speed players in our driver test, it’s the standard model’s performance among lower swing speed players that’s one of the stories of this test. Nearly 10 yards longer than our control club for lower speed guys, if you can’t get above 100 on the radar, well, then the XCG7 needs to be on your radar.

distance-mwfw-lss-2nd

Once again, tales of Cleveland’s demise have been greatly exaggerated. While higher swing speed players enjoyed hitting the 588, lower swing speed players thrived with it. As one of the less expensive clubs in our test, the Cleveland 588 offers big time performance at a more attractive price point.

distance-mwfw-lss-3rd

Even though I declared it dead just a week ago, JetSpeed absolutely refuses to die. And why should it. For slower swing speed players JetSpeed was a distance standout. Detractors will argue that the extra distance comes from a longer shaft. Those who hit it far won’t give a damn.

distance-mwfw-lss-4th

The can’t go wrong offering in the distance portion of our test, Big Bertha put up big numbers across all swing speeds, and if not for the Titanium offerings would have topped the overall distance list. We never advise buying blind, but if you insist on doing that, Bertha is probably your best bet.

distance-mwfw-lss-5th

While our higher swing speed players could have done with a bit less spin than even BiO Cell+ can offer, the standard BiO Cell was right in the wheelhouse of our slower swing speed players. The Cobra guys told us that their fairway woods weren’t wanting for distance. I have no choice but to agree.

Stay Tuned

Be sure to come back on Wednesday when we announce our 2014 Most Wanted 3 Wood for Accuracy, and again on Thursday when we announce our 2014 Most Wanted 3 Wood for Total Performance.

For You

For You

Golf Shafts
Apr 14, 2024
Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
News
Apr 14, 2024
A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
Drivers
Apr 13, 2024
Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Gordo

      9 years ago

      I have an ancient (circa 2000) Cleveland dual-rail 13 degree 3-wood that goes 260-270 off the deck here in Texas. Have not tried any more modern 3-woods because I am pretty happy with the fossil I am using, but from the comments here it is time to take a look.

      Thinking of taking the driver out the bag and just using the 3-wood off the tee. An extra club around the greens could be pretty handy. That said, the driver is a lot more forgiving both for distance and direction with off center hits.

      Reply

      Cobra Nut

      10 years ago

      I am late on a reply to this but better late than never eh? I own and hit a Cobra Bio Cell Plus 3 wood set at 14.5* and am doing great with it, averages are between 220 and 235 give or take a yard. I love the low and small imprint this club has and it is so easy to hit even a new golfer could use it. I tried out several other 3 woods and I liked the Tour Edge a lot as well but was not consistent with it, the Adams XTD was really long for me but control was my biggest fault with this club.

      Just recently (Sept 14) I bought a new Callaway 5 wood (yes this is about 3 wood I know) and I am not a fan of Cally nor TMAG and I am absolutely in love with my Razr Fit Extreme. this club is very smooth to swing, feels perfect weight wise and I pulled my Bio Cell 3-4 hybrid for the Callaway; point being I am not bound by any one brand although I am a Cobra Nut lol and MGS has given me a lot of info on different brands and I am thank full for no damn Gold medals awards to the highest bidder, I get results nothing more nothing less no biased opinions IMOP so thanks guys for the work you do I for one appreciate the results.

      Reply

      i_golf

      10 years ago

      Sorry fellas, this goes back further than just this article.  I believe it was in regard to the putter reviews, or the driver reviews, whichever happened approx a month ago.  Regardless, the moderators of this site were being rude and belligerent to people for noticing the same kind of relationship.  Reps from this site visited a factory, then a set of review came out shortly thereafter with the clear winner being the mfg in which hosted them.  It was funny at the time, but the response that these MGS guys had just seemed extremely defensive and unprofessional. 
      It is worth noting these relationships, and if i understand you correctly you appreciate learning about equipment and getting reviews that are accurate.  For example, If you found out cell phone company Brand X was giving away incentives to sell their phones, and you walk into a cell phone store asking for recommendations and they tell you that Brand X is out of this world, and their in-house testing shows it to be the best… Wouldn’t that cause a slight hesitation when deciding what to get?  I don’t find it unreasonable to consider ulterior motives when spending hard-earned money.  What is the purpose of these reviews if any questioning of how they are conducted brings a bevy of “you’re a troll!!!” type responses?  Who is actually trolling who?
      It is just golf, and this is just a small website in the grand scheme of internet.  So if they can’t find humor in what is a funny “coincidence”, and want to scream from the rooftops “How dare you question ME!”, then they aren’t the sort of golf buddies i would want to have.  This is golf gentlemen.  Busting balls comes with the territory, hell a men’s club was invented so men can escape the sensitivity of women and be a little crude and rough.  So MSG, other posters on this site, man up.  Have a laugh at the expense of another and if you want to bust balls right back, be my guest.

      Reply

      blstrong (SeeRed)

      10 years ago

      I still say “troll” simply because your accusations have no basis in fact, because your self-described questioning of an article does not have any more content to it than the last time you did it, and because you are very quick to turn to insult in lieu of actually attempting to strengthen your so called argument. You came to the thread, again dropped a one-sentence accusation, and didn’t expect to hear arguments disputing that accusation? This is troll-like behavior. The MGS tests are backed by data generated by non-MGS staff golfers. What are your accusations backed by? Assumptions? Prejudice? Bad hair day? “My bad for questioning an article…” Well, actually, you didn’t. You dropped and accusatory insult and left. Troll.

      Reply

      Neil

      10 years ago

      I am going to clear out all the extra clubs in my garage and trade them in for the Ping Rapture. It is the only way I can afford a $450.00 fairway wood.

      Reply

      i_golf

      10 years ago

      And enjoy the grammatical errors, i write on my phone while i take a fat “mygolfspy” and wipe my “most wanted list”

      Reply

      Adam

      10 years ago

      You certainly paint a clear picture of yourself for us. Thank you for that.

      “Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.”

      Reply

      i_golf

      10 years ago

      “There’s a difference between philosophy and a bumper sticker”
      Charles Schwartz

      flaglfr

      10 years ago

      I,
      I have to wonder if everything you read and hear from the website is so bad, why are you still here? They have laid out how the test was done above. it seems pretty clear cut as to how they did it. WE who read and comment may not always agree, but at least everybody (for the most part) wants to be civil about things.
      If you had read above, you would see that the work for the article was completed before the trip. I have to believe you to be either new to the site or simply don’t care to look at the articles. The amount of data that is disseminated from this site is immense compared to others. I don’t see your point.
      Hope you can find happiness somewhere in your life.
      Maybe the golf magazine or golf digest websites….

      Reply

      i_golf

      10 years ago

      My bad for questioning an article… the day after a seperate article described the wondefulness that took place during a MyGolfSpy special Ping factory tour. Seriously, how about this Tone Loc, write an article showing the science behind your reviews. You use a bunch of unnamed dudes to do you reviews. Thats flat-earth type thinking. Spin this as me being a troll, but the real issue is I read this hack website for two years and its my bad that it took until now to realize that your “non-profit” nonsense on reviews is strictly a lack of anyone wanting to advertise here, or support your smarm. So whenever a mfg does so much as bat an eye at you (aka Ping, whom i actually like), you flirt back with “The Greatestest Golf Club Evar!” article. Deperation stinks man

      Reply

      Chris C

      10 years ago

      The advantages of using actual golfers instead of machines has been repeatedly expounded upon. However, it strikes me that the current grip it and rip it approach tempered by 6 mulligans leads to results no more relevant than those produced by robotic hitting machines.

      Reply

      Adam

      10 years ago

      Hey Chris,

      I think you would have a good point on gripandrip if the testers had a “distance” day where they just attempted to get the ball as far as they could hitting as hard as they could. But these results are pulled from the test as a whole. The golfers are trying to hit target and get distance with every shot. So they aren’t exactly gripping and ripping unless that is their way of playing the game anyway.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      10 years ago

      Sufficed to say that the methodologies and determinations for what gets keeped and what gets dropped are a bit more complicated than ‘6 mulligans’.

      Our methodologies have continuously evolved over the last 4 years and will continue to evolve. Our latest revisions (which actually closely mirror some things we did last season) were made after extensive conversations with R&D guys at 3 of the major golf companies.

      Our goal is to make the presentation as simple as possible, but what goes into it is anything but.

      Reply

      John Barry

      10 years ago

      Great Review Tony, and I am for sure thinking of the Cobra Bio Cell 3 wood.

      Reply

      Jondagcl

      10 years ago

      Another great review. Was cool to see the big bertha rank so high, I’m loving mine.

      Still surprised to see the off comments about, a) this is rigged or b) how do you test the clubs. Detracts from the meaningful comments and overall conversation.

      Reply

      Jack

      10 years ago

      I’m not at all surprised that the XCG7 was the highest rated distance performer for slower swing speeds. Until recently, I had been playing XCG5 hybrids. I purchased a 22* xcg7 and found that it was just as long as my 19* xcg5. I suppose the power grid does make a difference.

      As soon as Tour Edge releases the fw version with the Tour 60 shaft later this month, the 4w will go straight into the bag.

      Reply

      TwoSolitudes

      10 years ago

      Love the look of the Ping. But using a three wood is out of the question for me. I am really hoping that the rankings for this and the accuracy correspond with 5 woods and 7 woods of the same model. Since that leaves out the Ping and my SS is under 100, the Tour Edge XCG7 looks pretty interesting. Love the low profile on it as well.

      Very curious to see the accuracy list!

      Reply

      i_golf

      10 years ago

      A couple days after you get a trip to Ping, you rate their fairway the best… not even goong to mask it anymore?

      Reply

      mnfats95

      10 years ago

      LOL, do you even read these articles?

      A. It’s only a win for average distance.

      B. It’s based on data, not opinion.

      C. It’s a $500 mini driver, it should win for distance.

      Reply

      AH

      10 years ago

      unfounded, uninformed

      The winner in the “Distance” category is a half inch longer than most of its contenders, has a huge 219 cc titanium head with only 13 degrees *not always a plus* of loft, and has a shaft that I would consider very lightweight for a fairway -52-64 grams. Being much closer to a little driver in specs it is basically a distance machine and still only beat out the second place contender by a marginal number. I would be slightly surprised if it won in the overall contest due to the accuracy issues that lower loft, longer length, and lighter weight can cause. Not to say that it cant win..I would just be surprised.

      Also worth mentioning, GS Dave and Tim, the two staff member that visited Ping headquarters in Arizona have nothing to do with this test.

      TwoSolitudes

      10 years ago

      Put down the goong and go back to sleep.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      10 years ago

      Just making sure I understand the accusation here…

      Two staff members whose roles don’t include any aspect of our fairway wood testing took a trip to PING after our testing was actually completed, and therefore dictated the results in order to appease PING. Brilliant theory!

      There’s absolutely no way this could actually be performance driven with real data collected from real golfers. I mean how can a Titanium-faced driver from one of the top companies in golf with a stock shaft length that’s a full 1/2″ longer than the majority of clubs in this test finish first for distance? It doesn’t make any sense.

      On a more serious note, I really don’t understand why you feel compelled to make these ridiculous accusations time and time again. If you have a question about or tests, how we operate…anything, just ask. Tossing around nonsense simply because things didn’t end up how you think they should, or because your favorite company didn’t do well, or just because that’s just the kind of person you are…is that really what you’re all about?

      Reply

      flaglfr

      10 years ago

      Wowzers!

      A lot of vitriol or testosterone with this one over the results. In case it was missed above, the difference between ALL of them (from the best to the worst) is about 6 yards. That is not even one club length of difference. Ergo, what does the test say to me? Pick the one you like, buy it and move on.

      Can’t we all just get along???

      flaglfr

      10 years ago

      P.S.: Kudos for the article.

      Regis

      10 years ago

      Tom, I may be adding to the problem but can I just say that most of us seem to really enjoy your work and appreciate the effort. The posters that criticize your methods or perceived bias seem to be very needy people and their posts add nothing to the conversation. I think most of us are capable of weeding through the negative comments but quite frankly they do bog down the experience. I’m sure you take your responsibilities seriously but is there any way we can just ignore these dolts and maybe in time they will just go away?

      blstrong (SeeRed)

      10 years ago

      troll

      Reply

      Randy

      10 years ago

      For me I can’t reach most par 5s in 2 so I don’t carry a3 wood. I carry a 60 degree wedge instead. I use my 18 degree 5 wood on narrow or short par 4s. More help around the green
      Leads to better scoring IMHO.

      Reply

      Vic

      10 years ago

      If Tour Edge spent the bucks most other manufactures do on advertising and Tour Pros it would be a common sight in more bags. As a ‘senior’ golfer now gee I made it, reading the golf mags. and listening to Pro instructors on cable and in most sporting stores it’s like, hit the 5 wood. Drop the 3 wood. Was even told by a $300. @ hour instructor that me using a 3 wood was a big no no and he taught that theory too. Well I’m not one to plop plop my way to the green with a five wood unless the situation calls for that. I want a 3 wood that makes up for some of the natural distance loss and have progressed through the Cobras, Clevelands, Adams etc. when I finally came back to Tour Edge with the Max-D Bazooka and am I glad I did. It is hot, long, workable and accurate. Nothing against the others but this baby works for me and I’m no spring chicken. So I was pleasantly surprised to find the XCG7 in the slower speed group. I knew they would be right up there but didn’t think so high in this category.
      Good test!

      Reply

      Steve

      10 years ago

      These Tests are my “Go To” for which clubs to try every year. They are absolutely fantastic and the only “real” testing data available. I Love the breakdown for Lower and Faster Swings as well. Great Work, Never Stop.

      Reply

      Regis

      10 years ago

      Always love your work. Thanks. I’m solidly in the <100 mph SS crew. Every year I search for a 3 wood and shaft combo that will answer my prayers. Picked up a Cobra Bio 5 wood and found it as easy to hit as any I've played and love the trajectory. So I have the 3 wood on my shopping list. But I got a Jetspeed 3 wood in a BOGO deal with the driver-tried it on the range (MATS) and didn't bond with it at all. But before I ordered a Cobra 3 wood I thought it only fair to try the Jetspeed on the course Yikes it is a nice club. I couldn't believe the difference from mat to turf. (I cut it down by 1/2 inch by the way). Anyway for us slow swingers both the Cobra and the Jetspeed should be on the demo list.

      Reply

      Dalton McCrary

      10 years ago

      What I’d like to know is:
      1) How are you testing them?
      2) Are you using golfers or have you got an Iron Byron. It makes a heck of a difference?
      3) What ball did you use with this test. It’s an awful high spin rate & did you change balls for lower swing speeds?
      4) What was the temperature the day or days you tested this.?
      5) Are these distances carry or roll-out?.
      6) What soft ware did you use to determine the figures?. AND
      7) You do this outside or on a simulator?.

      Appreciate you.
      Dalton

      Reply

      Adam

      10 years ago

      Dalton,

      I assume you are new here. A little digging would have gotten you your answers but in the spirit of being friendly to new comers here are answers to the questions I can address.

      Questions 1-2. They take 5-7 testers *all human that represent different demographics of golfers. No robots are used in testing as robots, robots are not people obviously and the results seen on Iron Byron and the like don’t always translate to practical human results. Look at “how we tested” above for details.

      Question 3. They all use the same ball. The spin rates for fairway wood off the deck are right in line with the respective swing speed category. Lower SS players need more spin to get the ball airborne and reach maximum potential, higher SS players need less. Also shots off the deck tend to contact the face of the club lower on the face producing lower launch and higher spins due to the gear effect and steeper angle of attack. The spin rates would most like drop “significantly” if they tested off of a short tee. *Tour average is actually 3600 rpms off the deck FYI

      Question 4. Just keep in mind that each club was tested in the same environment. So its apples to apples , at least as much as it possibly can be. Its safe to assume they tested within the range of “playable temps”.

      Question 5. Distance here is shown as total distance meaning carry plus roll. Individual data points for Carry, peak height, and roll out will be available later in the “DATA” section.

      6. They have proprietary formulas for “total driving”. But for this test…Pure distance.. they are just averaging distance on the best shots. How many shots it took to get them, or how many bad ones isn’t addressed in this section…just potential for distance. Think of today as how far you can possibly hit it, even if its only 1 in 10 times that you can do it.

      That’s all i have time to type out. If you still have questions look through the MGS posts for this years driving tests the process there is basically Identical and this will give you a good representation of what is to come for fairways.
      http://mygolfspy.com/2014-most-wanted-driver-longest-awards/

      :: 2014 Golf’s Most Wanted Driver – It’s Go Time
      :: 2014 Most Wanted Driver – Distance Awards
      :: 2014 Most Wanted Driver – Accuracy Awards
      :: 2014 Most Wanted Driver – Overall Winners
      :: 2014 Most Wanted Driver – Tester’s Pick
      :: 2014 Most Wanted Driver – Beyond the Data
      :: 2014 Most Wanted Driver – The Data

      Reply

      Jeff

      10 years ago

      I cannot fault my Ping G25 3 wood

      Jeff

      Reply

      Randy

      10 years ago

      It would be great if you guys tested drivers vs 3 woods for overall distance and accuracy. Especially with the Cally deep, rapture and mini sldr. thanks

      Reply

      ed

      10 years ago

      I believe those results will be coming in over the next few days, that is how mygolfspy usually does their “Most Wanted” reviews – they spread it out by distance, accuracy and overall

      Reply

      Klay

      10 years ago

      Great reviews! Cannot wait to see your most accurate FW since I valude the accuracy is more important than distance.

      Reply

      Ian

      10 years ago

      Thanks for this!!

      Reply

      Christian Furu

      10 years ago

      588 is the underdog of the year. The sleeper. Like the USA in World Cup soccer – “wow, they’re actually not bad!”

      Reply

      Peter Jackson

      10 years ago

      One factor not mentioned in the test was actual lofts. The Ping Rapture is 13 degrees whereas most others are 15 degrees.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      10 years ago

      True, but I think far too many golfers assume that less loft equals more distance. That’s simply not true. Fairway loft, just as it is with driver loft is a fitting variable.

      Hardly no one believes that an 8.5° driver is always longer than a 10.5°, yet many still believe at 13° fairway is always longer than a 15°. It’s not. Shaft length still has the greatest impact on distance, whereas loft is a contributor to creating better (closer to ideal launch conditions). For some 13° is closer to idea, but for others 15° provides better numbers.

      Reply

      Tom54

      10 years ago

      Happily I got a text from my pro shop literally this morning to tell me my Bertha had arrived. Can’t wait to pick it up.

      Reply

      BenJ

      10 years ago

      Those of us that have been using Tour Edge Exotics woods for years are not surprised by the XCG 7’s performance. I’ve had a XCG-V 4w in my bag for years now. The XCG 3 and 5 were both also very good woods. The original CB is still a favorite of many, too.

      Reply

      barbajo

      10 years ago

      Did Tight Lies make the test? If so, not surprised it’s not in the distance discussion. Bought one last fall and while it’s a nice club to hit and pretty forgiving, it’s bomber.

      On a side note – gotta love what Cleveland’s up to! Boffo performance in the driver test, and now showing string in the 3-wood test. And have tested their 588 MB’s, CB’s and TT’s – they’re making some nice stuff…

      Reply

      Joe M.

      10 years ago

      Please don’t ever stop. This info is amazing. I laugh at the “gold” medals now.

      Longggg time lurker.

      Reply

      flaglfr

      10 years ago

      Interesting on two fronts.
      First, is the difference by speed class. When looking at it from the speed class category, there is 3 yards difference between the top 5 for the under 100 class. Roughly the same for the over 100 class too. Sounds like you pull the wallet and go with any of these and you are about in the same neighborhood.
      Then you get into the overall testing and things go haywire. Bertha steps to #2 when the highest rank by speed is fourth in only one category? Confusing..

      By the way, the probable reason Callaway didn’t put in the 2 Hot is because it would have smoked the Bertha for less $$$.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      10 years ago

      If you look at the breakdown you’ll see that Bertha moves up the list because most everyone hit it reasonably well. #4 on the Low SS side, and a close #6 on the high. What we generally find is that the many clubs perform well for higher swing speed players, while an almost entirely different set perform well for lower swing speed players. Bertha and a few others performed reasonably well for both.

      We definitely would have liked to have seen how the X2 Hot 2 Deep (or even 3 Deep) would have performed in this test (alongside the Mini, I suppose), but it gives us something to think about in the future.

      Reply

      flaglfr

      10 years ago

      There is one other fact here that should not go unnoticed. There is less than one club length in the entire test between #1 and #10.

      Reply

      Adam

      10 years ago

      good point…that logic could probably be applied to TMAG and their Mini Driver.

      Reply

      Adam

      10 years ago

      Anyone else surprised at the absence of the i25 as a contender ( at least top 10). I would have thought from the majority of the people I have seen test personally that it would have better distance results than the Covert at the very least.

      Reply

      Adam

      10 years ago

      Actually when I think about it it makes sense. Shorter shaft, steel face, smaller head and we are just talking distance today. Its Monday man give me a break.

      Reply

      Ed

      10 years ago

      I came here to convince myself that splurging on the tour edge was a good move and that is exactly what I got

      Reply

      Adam

      10 years ago

      Thanks for all the work guys. I’ll be very interested to see how these relate to your accuracy scores.

      I’ve just purchased a 3 wood for the first time in a while. Sneaking in to the tests I was doing on my own, the SLDR fairway ( as much as it pains me to admit it) came out on top by an appreciably wide margin. The BioCell+ was a respectable second place
      I have to say I didn’t test any 300$ plus fairways and nothing with a titanium face. Demo’s of these clubs are scarce as shops don’t tend to order many clubs they doubt they can sell, and even if they had them I couldn’t justify the cost for 4 extra yds in a club that I use for target finding not distance gains.

      I’d be interested to hear how many of you have seen any of these in shops and how many plan to give them a test after seeing these results. Maybe some already own them.

      BTW. Subsequent tests of the SLDR 430 12 degree driver that was previously unavailable to me have occurred and I find myself rearranging my bag for 2 clubs from a line I said I hated. I was wrong …wont be the last time.

      Reply

      Qwagmire

      10 years ago

      Hit the Rapture the other day, still debating it only because of price. If it was under $300 I would have bought one on the spot. I realize you get what you pay for, its a mental thing with me.

      $450 is a chunk when Im looking for a new driver as well as a 3 wood for off the tee.

      Reply

      Gil B.

      10 years ago

      Thanks guys. I’m an avid Cleveland and Ping fan and can’t wait to hit them and do my own comparison.

      Reply

      Fozcycle

      10 years ago

      Great Review! As one who recently went back to Cobra with the Bio Cells, I can honestly say that I am getting unbelievable distance down the middle of the fairway with my 3 wood. I am a 97 mph SS guy and I am getting 200 – 220 out of it!

      Although it only ranked 4th, the distance difference is almost negligible (2.5 yds between 1st & 4th). I have much confidence when addressing the ball with my 3 wood. Currently, I have it set at 15.5* Draw.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      10 years ago

      Foz – we look at the data a bunch of different ways, and one of the things we watch very closely is standard deviation from the mean. In the case of this fairway wood test, what we saw across all 3 days (distance, accuracy, and total performance), and across all 3 swing speeds (total, high, low) is that that 3-4 clubs outperformed the average by more than 1 standard deviation and 2-3 underperformed by that same number. Basically that means that the majority of the clubs offer similar (statistically basically the same) performance. The numbers are there for those who want to do the math, but as you look at the numbers, gaps start to emerge…A 2-3 yard gap between one club and the next, with the next 10 or so all with in one yard of that.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Shafts
    Apr 14, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
    News
    Apr 14, 2024
    A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
    Drivers
    Apr 13, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.