What golf ball do you play?
As consumers, we all want to save money and make more informed decisions. However, we don’t necessarily want to give up performance just to save a couple dollars.
So, is it possible to find a high-quality, tour-level golf ball at a fraction of the cost?
Snell Golf just announced the release of the 2019 Snell MTB-X golf ball.
The pioneer of the direct-to-consumer golf ball market provides golfers a high-performance golf ball at a fraction of the cost. So, how does the new ball compare to its predecessor and does the new ball perform as well as the leading brand? We put it head-to-head to find out. We tested the 2019 Snell MTB-X (vs) 2018 Snell MTB Red (vs) 2019 Titleist Pro V1.
Join us today as Dean Snell, the founder of the brand, visits the MyGolfSpy Test Facility and reveals the latest entry into the Snell family: The MTB-X.
Could you be saving strokes AND dollars? Watch to find out.
NOW AVAILABLE FOR PRE-ORDER
The new 2019 Snell MTB-X is a 3-piece tour ball designed for lower driver spin, higher ball speeds, reducing “ballooning” with irons and providing excellent feel around the greens. (Available in white and yellow)
PRICE: $32.99/dz or $27.99 for 5 dz.
Joe
3 years agoGreat video. Good to know that companies out there try to keep prices where consumers can actually purchase them. Keep it up MYGOLFSPY love the testing!!!
Brian
3 years agoI’ve been playing the Snell MTB blacks since last season. They perform well for me and have a soft feel off the club face and around the green. I am looking forward to playing the X and maybe getting a little better spin around the greens.
Hank
3 years agoGreat video and comparison specs at variable swing speeds. Been playing Pro V1 for several years, tried the Chrome for a couple of boxes only. Looking forward to trying Snell MTB-X and Red. Ditto, written write-up prefered
adam huckeby
3 years agoI’d like to see something on longevity. I don’t lose a lot of balls and also am lucky enough to have a monitor at home. In testing, i loved the Bridgestone tour b x. However, after spending some time with the ball I found some problems. Primarily i noticed this at home. The ball, even when the cover appeared to be ok, i found that the balls might last one monitor session before the numbers became erratic. 50 or so shots later the ball would crack but it took that many shots to prove out what i was seeing….
this is very unsettling to me…maybe it’s not relevant to most but I have not seen this issue with Prov lines.
Glen Jones
3 years agoGood review. Will definitely try them out. I need to know if there is a better ball for my swing.
David Anthony Bernard
3 years agoI swing 80 mph and would like to try MTB-x as I use the older snell balls
Frank
3 years agoI play Snell MTB Black and Red and find the performance to be as good as any premium brand golf ball. So I trust that if the new MTB X is an improvement, then it is worth having. It is refreshing to find a truly comparable golf ball for less money. It is a trend I wish would catch on with equipment manufacturers. Well done Mr. Snell.
Scott von Hoetzendorff
3 years agoGreat Info thanks for explaining the difference in the balls. Thinking I will diffidently try these new balls out.
Trever
3 years agoGood info. I have a 95 mph swing speed and currently play the Callaway Chrome Soft. It would be interesting to see a comprehensive golf ball test instead of benchmarking all new balls to the ProV1. Thanks!!
Tom
3 years agoAt this point, I think someone must be paying them not to do this.
Still a huge fan of the site.
MyGolfSpy
3 years agoAnother baseless claim formed from nothing other than 100% pure speculation.
We start testing our 1st ever Most Wanted Golf Ball Test at the end of March.
Still not a huge fan of these type of comments.
Tom
3 years agoYess!! Let the Hate flow through you! Let the comments fuel you!
Looking forward to the test.
Still a huge fan even with you not being a huge fan of the comments.
Dan
3 years agoFunny how they test Snell against a pro v1. It’s not even the second best ball out there. No matter what they cost the TP5x is the best ball out by far, just ask Fowler.
Thom
3 years agoSeriously. TP5 is second class at best. Remember Fowler is paid big money to use. Monet talks not performance at that level
Joey5Picks
3 years agoThe host has it backwards: Pro V1x spins more than Pro V1.
https://www.titleist.com/teamtitleist/team-titleist/f/golf-balls/41042/avx-vs-v1-vs-v1x
Mike
3 years agoGreat link, and isn’t this a ‘role reversal’ of the Titleist balls? Up thru the 2015 models, I had always read that the Pro V1 spun more than the X
John Bates
3 years agoWould love some Snell MTB-Xs for my windy course in Ireland. Currently play MTB Black and have tried MTB Red. I think MTB-X could be perfect for me given the adjustments made. As usual Dean is constantly innovating, listening to his customers’ feedback and making his great product even better. When will MTB-X available this side of the Atlantic? Snell are a must-try golf ball for any avid golfer.
Ron Vaive
3 years agoTheses balls look awesome. Love the yellow!!
James
3 years agoI bought a test pack of Snell MTB Black and Reds a couple of weeks ago. Though I wanted to like the Red better, the Black is honestly the best for me. Probably because I have the swing speed of a snail on glue-covered coarse sandpaper. I’m so glad the Black is now offered in optic yellow. It really confused my playing partners when I teed up with a white MTB Black.
tpc
3 years agoI have played the Snell ball for some time. I bought mine right after the first test on Mygolfspy, and it preformed as good or better than the Prov1x for me. This was especially true with the wedges to achieve higher stopping spin.
Paul Taylor
3 years agoH8w about the numbers with the new tp5 and tp5x
LD
3 years agoThat would be great And also include the prov1X
Terry Schott
3 years agoI bought some of the MTB Red at the end of last year and haven’t had a chance to play with them yet due to the weather. Played the Black before that and now I really want to try the MTB-X. Thanks for the ball test and the review, I’m ready for summer. Just to add I started playing the 3 UP ball about 6 years ago until they had to go out of business because of being sued by Titleist and will now be a Snell ball user.
Griffin
3 years agoGood stuff!
Tony
3 years agoNow if Snell would make a low compression, urethane cover ball, with feel as soft as say a Chrome Soft, Supersoft, Wilson Duo Professional/Urethane, or Srixon Q-Star Tour… at the $24-29 price point… they’d take a big share of that market. Push the Get Sum down to $20-22, new soft urethane at $27-29, MTBs at $32 would be a winner combo
Ric
3 years agoYou are dead on ! Who wants another 40 + ball !!!
xjohnx
3 years agoHonest question here. How can a ball affect launch angle? I understand the influence a ball can have on overall height etc. through dimple technology and aerodynamics but can the ball itself really have an affect on the initial launch? I’m guessing it’s safe to say that the slight variance in launch in a test like this is a result of the human variable? Nevertheless, I’m not suggesting you leave the info out, just wondering if it’s actually relevant? Thanks
Raymond CHASTEL
3 years agoI’ve taken up the SNELL golf balls since they came out and honestly find them pretty good in distance and feel..But I have to say there’s to much emphasis put on the role of the ball in modern golf .I play golf since 1960:we had the “small ” English ball and the “larger ” American ball “at that time .The latter took over with a resulting loss of distance .I found recently a very old box of MAXFLI RED DOT BALATA balls (New )at my home .Il played them on the golf course :well they proved as good as the SNELL’s and PRO V1’s of today ;The “feel ” of the balata ball is much better than the feel of the modern 4 piece balls of today
Vince L
3 years agoSorry, but I highly doubt your claim about this “very old” Maxfli ball and it’s current performance. Several years ago I took out not only some Maxfli HTs (also balata and a favorite on the senior tour in it’s heyday) but also sleeve of Titleist Professionals. Neither one of them traveled more than 180 yards, they were as dead as could be at that age, just plain dead.
Mike
3 years agoI agree with Vince. I believe the only advantage the old balata balls had was they were easier to work left and right, but the durability of the old balls is not even worth discussion. There’s a reason tour players play the new balls, and their golf courses are being lengthened as a result.
Mark Mc
3 years agoOne of my golf buddies has used snell balls for about three years and swears by them. He gave me a sleeve and I must say they performed very well, for anyone looking for a little more distance from all clubs this should be a ball they try .
Stump
3 years agoI have never bought any Snells, but I’ve found a few and played them. I’ve only found Red and would like to try the Black and the new X sounds good.
I have a question about the cost structure though…Dean says the cost difference is due to paying pros, advertising and the multiple levels of transactions…he doesn’t mention that Snell is made in China, so there has to be some amount of cost savings due to that.
Andrew
3 years agoMost balls are.
Mike
3 years agoAgreed Andrew. During the last big strike at the ports here on the west coast you couldn’t get many brands of golf balls, especially Titleist. Why, because they come from the same places overseas.
Ryan
1 year agoLots of titleist balls are made on the east coast. China is closer so maybe those balls are not as easily available and this titleist are harder I come by. Just a thought
Luc Lacoursiere
3 years agoAlways nice to see that there are options out there that are affordable. I usually play the Srixon Zstar XV because it’s a great ball and it seems to be the one that always go on sale for a very good price (25$/dozen last year). But I will surely try Snell one day (unless Srixon keeps up with their promotion),,,
Ray Baldwin
3 years agoI tried a red one I found and I don”t think I will give up my srixon xv’s.
Mike
3 years agoRay, if you play the Srixon XV you may want to give the MTB Black a try. I found it to be more comparable.
Mike B
3 years agoRay, if you play the Srixon XV you may want to give the MTB Black a try. I found it to be more comparable.
Joe Golfer
3 years agoAlways enjoy the videos with Dean Snell.
Good to see that these live up to the hype and are just as good as top of the line tour balls.
Michael
3 years agoI appreciate the business model. No BS. Great performance for less money. Will be ordering the MTB X.
Six
3 years agoBeen playing snells for 3 years now. Just as good as provs for $15 less. Tried cut, mg, vice, onecore… nothing as good as a snell.
Bill
3 years agoI play both the MTB black and red. Yes I loose a little distance with the red but notice the extra spin. Best balls out there by far in comparison to any of the big companies. I generally order 15 dozen every year in May with company log which Snell does for me. Client love them. Looking forward to trying the MTB-X especially since I like to play yellow balls. Great work Dean and great work by MyGolfSpy, love your reviews.
LR
3 years agoI’m definitely going to try these, currently using Vice.
DFinch
3 years agoOnly thing missing was including the MTB Black to show the specific separation between the two models.
Played great for half the season with the Red. Switched to the Black for second half. Both great balls. I didn’t mind the Red cover but did notice it struggled in wind. Looking forward to trying the X.
Bob Bronkhorst
3 years agoI would also like to see the comparison to the ProV1x. Have you compared these in the past? The Vice Pro + would be another to look at in comparison!
Thanks,
Bob
David
3 years agoThe very best value and performance available… and friendly on the pocket!… can play more golf! The new X looks great- but the Black hits the sweet spot for me…
Bob Ferguson
3 years agoHave been playing Snell for about 3 years…only downside is that the Black seemed a little harder control when hitting into greens. Definitely going to try the MTB X. One question for MGS: Why not do this test with a cross section of 10 top balls — from Chrome Soft to Vice…and all in between? That would really be helpful…as a young Senior(68) with a 90 MPH I need to know what the balls will do.
Kevin
3 years agoGreat data as always. What was the make of the 7 iron? Might have to check out Snell
ryebread
3 years agoAnd what’s the loft on the wedge?
Norm Chabot
3 years agoSnell golf balls are running neck and neck with the other New England champions, the Redsox and Patriots. Can’t wait to put the new ball I play.
Bill
3 years agoThank you for all you do. Thanks to your testing I purchase some red and black balls. I liked the black with a softer feel than the red. Looking forward to trying the the MTB x after seeing your test results.
Sharkhark
3 years agoWhy was Snell able to provide both versions yet you only tested prov1? Why wasn’t the prov1 x tested as well?
Jerry Noble
3 years agoBecause the Prov1x would be longer than any of those tested. This test may show that they are comparable distance wise, but what about chipping? What about durability and dependability. Is every ball going to perform the same. We know Titliest do? That is the reason lower handicapped players will continue to pay for the Titliest. They trust them.
I have a hard time trusting an independent test when the owner of the one company is there trying to promote his product. If it was truly independent and unbiased, there would be no need for the Snell guy to be there.
George P
3 years agoThat’s horsecrap, and you know it! The guys at MyGolfSpy AND Dean Snell are as reputable as they come. ProV1 is the most trusted because it’s been around the longest and is the #1 Ball in Golf. But does that mean it’s the best? Absolutely not! Tests have proven that the new TaylorMade TP5x and Srixon XV are longer than the ProV1x, and they spin just as much around the green. If you want to keep paying top dollAr for golf balls, keep buying Titleist. I bought the original Snell MTB and the MTB Red and found them to be as good or better than any other tour ball at $20 less per dozen. I know where my money is going!!
mackdaddy
3 years agoWhat is the compression of the new Snell Balls?
David
3 years agoLast year I played the Red in yellow. Now that both balls are in yellow, I am going to have to do some research as to which one is going to be best for me. I only have a 85-90 MPH driver swing speed. Looking forward to playing them.
Brad Gollhardt
3 years agoI am always looking for a better ball than Pro VI. I am currently trying the Vice Pro Soft in Green-Yellow. I really like the feel, especially on a putter. Very solid feel. Not too soft. Off the driver it is fine, but green side spin is a little less than hoped. But at $25 per dozen still a good value. Would love to try some Snells and give an honest opinion. I have only hit a few that I accumulated in the woods. Thanks, Brad G.
Dave
3 years agoWhen will the MTB X be available on the Aussie website? blacks have been sold out for a long time now to…
Howard
3 years agoI would like to see you compare the snell balls to the Srixon Z-Star XV.
Darin Wilken
3 years agoInteresting information!! Would love to give them a try.. I’m a 1 handicap at my local course with about a 110mph swing speed and use a ball designed for swing speeds over 70mph just to show my other league members… It’s not the ball!! Play what you feel comfortable with and what you can afford!!
P.J.
3 years agoI did a test of Snell’s original “My Tour Ball” several years ago and have been hooked ever since. Like many others, I tried the revision of MTB Black and MTB Red. For me, MTB Black was the better fit.
When I heard the news there was a new product coming – I thought to myself ‘what could it possibly be? they already have some fantastic balls’.
After watching this video (very well done, btw) I’m anxious to try the new MTB-X balls.
Thanks to Dean Snell for listening to his consumers and making an even better golf ball! And a hearty Thank You to MyGolfSpy for the testing that helps us all make better decisions about all things golf related.
Jason Taylor
3 years agoI have been enjoying the MTB Red and am disappointed that they are being discontinued but I think that the X will be worth trying out.
Foz
3 years agoGreat review Sam/Dean. As an 85 mph swinger I have gravitated to the softer balls for more distance(Get Sum, Wilson Duo, Q Star Tour). I still have a box of MTB’s to use, but am now going to try the MTB-X. Thanks again.
seanAG
3 years agoLoved Snell MTB black last year, definitely going to test MTB-X once the weather improves
Chris
3 years agoPlayed the Red last season, looking forward to trying the new X.
Joe Cronauer
3 years agoThank you for your informative, unbiased and thorough review. It is so helpful to have an informed opinion, rather than making “trial and error” purchases that only lead to an incomplete set of data.
John Marsh
3 years agoLast year recovering from rotator surgery, played the GET SUM. Bought the test pack Black/Red for 2019, would be nice to also include the MTB-X in this springs test to get back to better golf
Frank Rosie
3 years agoAs I have gotten a little older, swing speed is down to 87-90 range. I’ve been playing the Black to get a little more distance, but the numbers for the X look REALLY good! I’m definitely going to try the X and see how it compares to the Black with my swing speed. Dean, you are making some great golf balls, at a price that no one can beat. Who wouldn’t want to play a ball like that!
Troy
3 years agoAwesome video. Really dig the Snell ball. Would be cool to see a shirt with a cartoon depiction of a Snail character going really fast. Snell…faster than the others.
Bob
3 years agoUse Snell tour balls 3 years ago. Didn’t order any more. My pro was selling Srixon Z – star at $35 /doz so have been using those. Will try Snell again.
Fernando
3 years agoBeen using MTB Red and woul love to try MTB X before going out and buying.
Thanks!
Bud Beaird
3 years agoI have played prov1, prov1x, tp5x and a number of Callaway and srixon. The prov1 seems bext for me. As I age, my swing speed has reduced to 95 to 100mph. I would love to try the new Snell MTBX ball
Divit Howker
3 years agoI’m based in the UK and currently use the MTB black, I hope the new MTB X will be available in the UK.
DannyT
3 years agoI have a slower swing speed and have played yellow balls for the past two years. Would like to try the Snell ball.
Jim
3 years agoJust finished watching the Snell announcement video and then saw this review. been playing the Snell MTB since it was first released and most recently have been playing the MTB Black. Great ball at a great price, and comparable to any other premium ball out there. Wasn’t a big fan of the Red but this new X sounds like it worked out all the kinks and for most players adding spin around the green is a good thing. Really like the honest presentation of the ball technology from Dean too. I’ll be ordering the Black and X balls once they arrive next month for sure. Another nice review by MGS!!
Jesse
3 years agoBeen playing Snell MTB mostly except in the winter months. Because of my eyesight I need a yellow ball.
I tried the Red last week. Good ball but I lost a bit of distance, not much but it was noticeable. Looking forward to trying the X.
Snell balls are great and the price is right. Plus they are always available unlike another ball that shall not be named
Bryan
3 years agoI’ve been turning my friends on to the Snell golf balls for years. I’ve played Pro V-1’s because I like the feel around the greens. The Snell golf balls are just as good or better. The price is definitely a better value. I’m an accomplished player with a 3 hcp and prefer a high performance golf ball. The only reason why I wouldn’t play Snell’s is because I forgot to order them on line. Not as convenient as the pro shop but worth the effort.
David Lewis
3 years agoLove watching Dean explain golf technology. Been playing older MTB and like it. Would love to try the X. 100 mph swing speed.
Jeff
3 years agoLoved the MTB, but also have the Cut grey, would like to see the numbers from cut, I am not sure about distance off the tee, but have consistently scored well with them. Thanks for the information
Walter
3 years agoGreat video. Would be nice if you could do a test comparing the MTB-x vs MTB blk.
Donny Greever
3 years agoWatched your Snell testing video and like the results. Have used Snell golf balls in the past and this affirms that they happen to be the best ball for the price, Thanks GolfSpy
Scott
3 years agoThe original MTB and MTB Black are great balls. Did not care for the MTB Red. Even though the X will probably be a little firmer than I like, certainly want to try them for myself. Love what deal is doing with the new tier pricing format. Snell balls have always been a tremendous value and 2019 looks even better.
Todd
3 years agoPlayed quite a few rounds the last couple years with the original black and was satisfied enough for the price. Not so much with the Red, no where even remotely close to any of the ProV’s, really didn’t like anything about it. Played like a Pinnacle, no thanks. Still a believer that the black is a great low cost substitute for the ProV lover. I don’t lose enough balls to be overly concerned with the price so I’ll stick to ProV’s for any type of competitive rounds.
Dave Youngers
3 years agoGuess I’ll have to test the MTB-X … have MTB Black to try when golf season rolls around
Mike
3 years agoAnother great interview and product review. Thanks MGS. I will definitely be trying the MTB X out this golf season.
Dan Hale
3 years agoRight leg below the knee amputee veteran just getting back into golf would love to try these balls
Jeff
3 years agohow is the sound of the MTB-X off the putter? Does it feel clicky?
Adam Warren
3 years agoSnell is always good. Can’t wait to try them!
Richard Geisel-Churchill
3 years agoI am a die hard Snell Red player. Love the ball and now looking forward to playing the X. Great job MGS and Dean Snell
10shot
3 years agoI played 5 dz OK ball, cuts to easy for my taste. Good ball if your looking to save some cash but, it ain’t no Titleist ProV when playing your short game.
James
3 years agoIf your ball cuts too easy then you have a swing that should never be touching a pro V1. Unless you are referring to cover scraping that relates to hitting wedge shots with lots of back spin.
10shot
3 years agoWhen you smash the ball on the face it causes a violent reaction and fiction. Fiction equals heat, heat melts plastic, after 3 holes Snell’s shell cuts, scrapes or whatever you would like to call it. Now, let’s add the grooves of well prepared clubs, all this equals cutting. Snell’s just are no made to take hard hits and sharp wedge grooves. Good ball, but it ain’t no Pro V or Bridgestone RXS.
Equal to Bridgestone e6 at best.
You have ur opinion I have mine no need to bash anyone’s game or opinion.
Have a great day
Tim Delay
3 years agoGreat information on the new Snell balls. I’ve played them in the past and will be buying some more. Thanks!
Dustin Wade
3 years agoNice results with MTB-X! Would love to try some. Thanks MyGolfSpy!
Dan B
3 years agoFor someone with a 90 mph driver speed would the primary difference between the X and the Black basically be feel with the X a little firmer and the Black a little softer? I know Dean said the Black takes a little spin off but I’m not sure a my swing speed it will make that much difference. BTW I have 7 hdcp index and am able to maintain this because of a pretty good short game.
Dennis Kruepke
3 years agoGood video; need to give them a try!
Randy Kemp
3 years agoAnxious to try these. I loved the Titleist NXT Tour balls before they went away Play the Pro V1X now. The comparison will be very interesting.
No mention is ever made, but it’s safe to think these are USGA conforming, right?
Randy
3 years agoEnjoyed the video. I’ve played all the Snell balls and love them. The Red is definitely longer for me, but the Get Sum for a reason I don’t understand is straighter, but not as long. Given I play a narrow course and not that long, it’s hard to keep the GS in my pocket. I’m sure I’ll be ordering some yellow X’s soon.
Gil Bloomer
3 years agoAfter watching this video completely it appears that the PRO V1 and the new Snell MTB-X are so close in performance data that the biggest difference is price. And for that reason viewers who like wasting their money on Titleist Pro V1’s should buy the new Snell ball. Thanks Dean, keep up the great work.
Bill Hoyle
3 years agobuying in bulk is a real savings. would love to try the new ones.
Wonder how they compare with Vice and Kirkland, my other two savings balls?
Rob C
3 years agoReally enjoyed that video. I knew of Dean’s background with Titleist and the original ProV1, bu thad no idea about the TM Red and Lethal balls. I was an avid Red user when it was being produced.
I have just never gotten around to trying Snell, mostly because it’s easier just to pick up the ProV or ZStar in the pro-shop, versus taking time to do an online order.
But I will certainly order a couple dozen of the MTB X to try out.
Greg w
3 years agoSeamless covers?
Jim Bean
3 years agoI started playing the original Snell MTB four years ago. I switched to the MTB Red when it came out and am still playing it. I have given balls to anyone and everyone that I can get to try them. I personally tested the Snell ball against the pro V and could not find any appreciable difference. I maintain a handicap of zero to one, so the golf ball is important to me. I absolutely would not play Snell just because of price, but when you combine performance and price it’s a no brainer. I have already pre-ordered the MTB-X value pack even though I still have four dozen unopened MTB-Reds. Those reds will make for an excellent bag of practice balls! Thanks to Dean Snell and all his staff for continuing to provide outstanding products at outstanding value!
Dave
3 years agoI’ve been playing the MTB Red since late 2017. I’ve already bought my supply for this season (during Snell’s Red Sox World Series promotion), but I’ll definitely check out the MTB-X when my supply starts to run short. I hate the idea of spending $40+ for a box of balls, so it is great to get top shelf performance for a much lower price.
STeve
3 years agoReally, really looking forward to testing MTB Black vs MTB-X. Apparently, Titleist brought the speed UP (to the Snell) for the 2019 ProV1, but Snell keeps giving “em a hip check.
Louis
3 years agoI’ve played Pro V1 for years, but I will definitely try Snel..
ex007
3 years agoGreat. So what do I do with the 6 doz. MTB Reds still sitting in the original shipping box??
Mark M
3 years agoExactly ?
David Gardner
3 years agoI Love testing golf balls.. My wife said I have more golf balls the Dick’s sporting goods… lol
Junnah
3 years agoHuge fan of MyGolfSpy and Snell, thanks much for the test. As soon as I finish this post, I’m heading over to Snell to pre-order a dozen yellow MTB-X. I was one of those customers blow up his phone after your test. Dean Snell is killing it.
The Snell 2017 MTB was good but the 2018 MTB-Black is way better. I’ve purchased at least 16 dozen of them in 2018. Since I play nearly every day, I like to put a new ball in for tournaments or special outings and find that the ball will hold up well, to my standard, for at least two rounds. The ball is longer than anything I tried during the Spring of 2018.
What was very cool about your podcast, was watching Dean’s reaction when someone slid the sleeve of the new ProV1s across the table. The man didn’t hesitate to want to test his ball against the “big guy’s” ball. Not sure if that was staged, but it was golden! For competitive reasons, I typically don’t share why I use certain equipment when I play but I love to tell the story about Snell, especially when I tell them what I pay and that shipping is free.
JON SILVERBERG
3 years agoI DON’T UNDERSTAND THE DATA PRESENTED FOR WEDGE SHOTS AT 85 MPH SWING SPEED (I ASSUME THAT MEANS 85 MPH WITH A DRIVER; WEDGE SWING SPEED WOULD NECESSARILY BE LESS). THE DISTANCE YOU FOUND WITH THE DRIVER AND THE 7 IRON AT THAT SWING SPEED IS UNDERSTANDABLE; HOWEVER, THE DISTANCE FOR THE WEDGE AT THAT SWING SPEED IS BIZARRE. I’M AN 85-88 MPH SWING SPEED PLAYER WITH THE DRIVER; MY PITCHING WEDGE GOES 110 YARDS AND MY SAND WEDGE GOES 85-90 YARDS. ANY THOUGHTS ON AN EXPLANATION?
Yannish
3 years agoThese balls are not designed for someone with your swingspeed. The testing is commensurate for the speed of player who would actually see a benefit from a premium ball.
JON SILVERBERG
3 years agoPerhaps I did not make myself clear enough: the data presented for distance with these three balls at my general swing speed (85-88 with a driver) makes perfect sense for the driver distances and the 7 iron distances; however, I hit my sand wedge 15-20 yards further than the sand wedge distances shown in the table…is there an explanation for this discrepancy? Were the sand wedge swings not full swings?
(and Yannish, I don’t think Dean Snell would agree with you that his balls weren’t designed for my swing speed…I assume he sees his market as bigger than only those guys who hit it 319…)
Jerry Noble
3 years agoSwing speed is not the only factor in determining distance. Two people can have the same swing speed and one may maximize his distance by the way he swings and the other doesn’t. For example, with a driver in order to maximize distance you need to swing with a slight upward strike. If you swing down with the driver at 90 mph, the guy that swings up will hit it 20 yard or more farther. Especially if his strike is on the sweet spot and yours is not. Then the difference is really exaggerated. By the same token, if you hit down on your driver and irons and the other guy swings up or sweeps his irons, you are going to hit those longer. I know guys who are very long with irons and short with the driver for that reason.
Someone with a very swing speed can get by hitting down with a driver. In fact, most pros have a slight downward pass with the driver. But anyone with less than 100mph needs to have an upward pass at the ball with the driver. More lag with a slower swing speed will go farther than a faster swing with no lag.
Paul
3 years agoVery well said!!
Spongy5
3 years agoIt apoears the higher swingspeeds see the biggest changes in performance. For your average golfer it comes down to price see data shows basically no change. Money in my wallet is better then in theirs.
Jeff Collins
3 years agoThanks for the info! I’ll have to add mtb-x to the list of balls to test this spring.
sinewave
3 years agoTrust me when I tell you that I’m the only golfer playing the Snell MTB Red in Uruguay. I’ve given away sleeves of them to my buddies and they all love the ball . Keep in mind that a sleeve of Pro-V1s cost US$25 at the clubhouse. So imagine when I tell someone that one dozen Snell balls only cost me $28.
Once I work my way through the six dozen I purchased in 2018 I´ll be looking towards six dozen of the MTB-X.
Dean found the right business model for success and we’re all better off for it.
A mil gracias Señor Dean Snell!!!
Brian Lear
3 years agoHave been playing the MTB Red, looks like I’ll try the MTB-X next time.
Emery
3 years agoI’ve tried a couple Snell balls that I found on course and didn’t find them any better or worse than ProV’s that I was playing last year. This year I moved to TP5’s and just really like the overall performance of this ball. If only they would remain $35/doz in the future!
Andy
3 years agoCurrently playing the MTB Black, switched from the Reds. Played TP5 before switching to Snell, I’ve shot some of my lowest rounds with Snell. Great ball, great value. Would love the chance to try the new MTBx, white.
Kris Porter
3 years agoGreat comparison. Really enjoyed the video. I have not hit a Snell ball but after watching the video, they are definitely on my radar as one to give a go.
Karlton Uhm
3 years agoThanks for your insight on the new MTB-X balls.
Dave
3 years agoGETSUM works for me as a senior golfer.
Michael
3 years agoI currently play the MTB – Red, and would love to test these new MTB-X balls.
Kenny B
3 years agoGreat video! Dean Snell has been a long-time contributor to MGS on the forum, and I have appreciated his comments over the years.
I have played the original Snell MTB and liked it, but haven’t played the new MTB Red or Black. It sounds like the MTB X is the ball I should use. I will be getting some as soon as the snow melts!!
Hope to see more side-by-side comparisons like this.
Robert
3 years agoLove these tests!!! Can we get a MTB Black vs the 2019 ProV1x? I have played primarily ProV1x since college, but would love to save a little money if the feel and stats are comparable. Thank you guys for all you do.
Carmine Preziodi
3 years agoWould love to test those balls when the season starts…
Thank you,
Carmine
Hack62tpi
3 years agoI have found the Snell to be equal to pro v1x for my game as well.
Same performance at a lower price.
TBT
3 years agoI’ve been playing Snell balls for a couple of years now, I get the same performance as the $50 a dozen balls at about half the price!
I’ll definitely order up a dozen of the MTB-X and give them a shot
kevin
3 years agoReally appreciate the testing, especially at various swing speeds
Chris Puffer
3 years agoThanks for the comparison test. Great data set.
Richard H.
3 years agoGood review. Would like to have seen descent angle on the iron shots simply because that is a factor in determining overall stopping power, but still easy enough to deduce (stopping power) based on launch, spin, and the difference between carry and total distance. I agree with the MTB having a substantial feel at impact (not hard just more substantial/noticeable) – currently gaming the MTB Black and that’s one thing that stands out compared to other brands I’ve played. Great ball all around, but will likely switch to something else just based on preferred feel. Performance is absolutely top-notch from Snell.
Paul
3 years agoPlayed a sleeve.. Good performance
Jon
3 years agoCan we have a written version of the review for those of us who like a quick browse while waiting for things to happen at work and don’t want a video/audio playing?
Joe
3 years agoAfter trying the Trial pack I prefer the MTB-X tee to green a great performer. Like the Yellow version.