2021 Golf Ball Survey Results
Golf Balls

2021 Golf Ball Survey Results

2021 Golf Ball Survey Results

A few weeks ago, we asked you to take our annual golf ball survey. We asked you about your preferences, buying habits and how likely you are to recommend brands to your friends. Your feedback helps us better understand your perceptions as well as trends in the market.

More than 10,00 (10,680) of you completed our survey. Here are some of the more interesting results.

What Are Your Golf Buying Habits?

How many golf balls to golfers buy?

We know from the survey that the majority of our readers play between 26 and 55 rounds of golf annually (26-40 was listed most often). What does that rate of play translate to as far as golf ball purchases are concerned?

  • The highest percentage of you buy five to six dozen balls annually.
  • Perhaps this is why when brands give away “a year’s supply of golf balls”, it’s typically six dozen.
  • I’d wager that those of you buying fewer than four dozen balls are playing a bit less, while I’m envious of those of you who play enough golf to need at least seven dozen (though I’ve had weekends where I’ve gone through nearly that many).

We know how many balls you’re buying so now let’s take a look at what you’re buying.

  • A  significant majority of you (85 percent) play golf balls with urethane covers.
  • Fewer than 13 percent of you are playing ionomer. I love you guys.
  • Across the entirety of the market, urethane accounts for roughly 55 to 60 percent of golf ball purchases.

It should be noted that non-traditional golf outlets like Walmart and Amazon aren’t included in the market data so it’s certainly possible that inexpensive (cheap) ionomer over-indexes outside of traditional golf retail.

In addition to asking about how many balls you buy each year, we also asked where you buy them.

  • Direct over the internet and big-box account for more than half of your golf ball purchases.
  • Online golf specialty retailers account for just shy of 17 percent while Amazon accounts for another five percent.
  • Green grass appears to be dipping in popularity which may benefit challenger brands who have been locked out of on-course shops because of exclusive deals.

First, if you’re paying more than $50 for a dozen balls, you’re probably doing it wrong. If you’re paying less than $20, you’re probably also doing it wrong.

  • Given the prevalence of urethane among survey takers, $40-$50 for your golf balls is reasonable.
  • The majority of you report spending $30-$40 per dozen.
  • $30-$40 is common for DTC brands and bulk pricing from traditional OEMs.
  • There are some excellent bulk DTC deals to be had below $30 as well (when inventory allows).

Using six dozen a year as a benchmark, it may be worth pointing out that the total cost difference between a premium offering and sub-$30 discount ball is less than $100 a year. I understand that, for some, that extra $100 means another couple of rounds but the larger point is that cheap balls really aren’t that much cheaper.

What Influences Your Purchasing Decision?

It’s not terribly surprising that Brand Reputation leads the way in our weighted averages, followed closely by price and our own Ball Lab (that’s kind of exciting). We’d wager that Tour Use is more of a factor for the golfing population as a whole than it is for the MyGolfspy reader. Looking more deeply at the details:

  • Brand Reputation was selected as the most important factor by nearly 30% of you.
  • Less than 4% of you said Tour Use was the most important factor (only another 7% ranked it #2).
  • Color/Pattern options was chosen in the Top 3 more than 20% of the time. It’s not a major factor, but it suggests golfers want options.
  • MyGolfSpy Ball Lab was listed as the most important factor for 23% of you and was listed in the Top 3 for 66% of respondents (the same as Brand Reputation and Price).

 

What Are You Looking For in a Golf Ball?

Using the weighted average as the metric, the results are more or less what I’d expect (and want) to see. The devil is again in the details.

  • While Feel ranks third under the weighted average, it was actually selected as the most important attribute by the highest percentage (26%) of you. You’re killing me. Frankly, I love some of you a bit less.
  • Notably, Feel was ranked fourth in importance (ahead of only Forgiveness) by 22 percent of you. To me, this suggests that either you really care about feel or you don’t care much at all.
  • Driver Distance was a top-3 selection for nearly 70 percent of respondents.
  • Forgiveness was rated least important by more than 40 percent of you.
  • Greenside Spin is a surprise No. 4. It’s the one attribute nearly every golfer I talk to about balls tells me they want more of. Perhaps golfers just want other things a bit more.

Does Golf Ball Color Matter?


In the grand scheme of things, golf ball color, patterns, etc., are largely unimportant but that doesn’t mean the popularity of non-white balls isn’t on the rise.

  • More than 16 percent of you report playing a yellow ball most often.
  • Just under four percent of you use one of a growing number of patterned balls that are on the market.
  • If you’re not making some sort of patterned balls (Titleist, Bridgestone and Srixon), you’re conceding share to your competitors.

What Are Your Preferred Golf Ball Brands?

What's the most popular golf ball brand?

  • Given Titleist’s position as The #1 Ball in Golf, we’d expect to see it top the chart so it’s almost expected that 75 percent of you would report having played a Titleist ball at some point in the last year.
  • TaylorMade is a surprise (to me) at No. 2 (I’d have guessed Bridgestone), suggesting it has cemented its position as a serious player in the ball market, especially within the urethane category.
  • Among the DTC brands, Snell is the most popular with Vice and the Costco Kirkland brand about five percentage points behind.

  • Titleist isn’t a surprise (again) as the most preferred ball.
  • Bridgestone and TaylorMade are only tenths of percentage points apart at just under 12 percent.
  • Snell was the leader among DTC brands and was selected fourth most often overall.

For this question, we asked how likely you were to recommend each of the brands listed. The chart shows the weighted average of your responses. A higher score means golfers report being more likely to recommend the brand to a friend or colleague.

The interesting tidbits are in the details behind the data:

  • Fifty-one percent of you said you were Extremely Likely to recommend Titleist. Another 34 percent said they were Likely to recommend the Titleist brand. Only two percent said you were highly unlikely to do so.
  • Bridgestone (22%) and TaylorMade (21%) were second and third on the list of balls that you were Extremely Likely to recommend.
  • Golfers said they were Highly Unlikely and Extremely Likely to recommend Callaway at approximately the same rate (+/- 10%)
  • Golfers said they were Extremely Likely to recommend Snell at nearly three times (18%) the rate of its nearest DTC competitor (Vice 6.5%).
  • OnCore was the brand golfers said they were Highly Unlikely to recommend most often (32%). Whether that’s lack of familiarity, a performance metric or blowback from Wayne Player’s stunt at the Masters isn’t clear.

Finally, we took a more detailed look at your recommendations, this time asking not how likely you are to recommend each brand but rather how likely (on a scale of 1 to 10) you are to recommend your preferred ball. It’s what’s known as a Net Promoter Score.

To build this chart, we cross-referenced the answers you gave when we asked you to tell us your preferred golf ball brand. It’s definitely the nerd in me speaking but I find the results fascinating.

Generally speaking, the DTC brands included in the survey have the highest NPS, the highest percentage of promoters (rated 9-10) and the lowest percentage of both passives (rated 7-8) and detractors (rated 0-6).

  • OnCore was listed as the preferred brand the fewest of any brand in the chart but it has the highest NPS (77) of any brand in the survey.
  • Snell (76) was second overall and has the smallest percentage of detractors (2%) of any brand in the survey.
  • Vice (68) wasn’t far behind with only three percent of you qualifying as detractors.

This suggests that while fewer of you list these DTC brands as the maker of your preferred ball, those of you who do are fiercely loyal and don’t hesitate to recommend them to your friends (or colleagues).

Among the traditional golf brands:

  • Titleist had the highest overall NPS (60), the highest percentage of promoters (67%) and the smallest percentage of Passives (7-8), suggesting there’s little in the way of ambivalence about the brand.
  • Bridgestone edged out TaylorMade with more promoters, fewer detractors and an overall higher Net Promoter Score.
  • Srixon’s overall Net Promoter Score trails the leaders. However, it has the fewest detractors (7%) of any traditional manufacturer in the survey.

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have any additional feedback? Was there anything that surprised you? Let us know in the comment section below.

For You

For You

Irons
Apr 24, 2024
PXG Irons: Model By Model
Putters
Apr 23, 2024
PING 2024 Putter Line Extension
News
Apr 23, 2024
Nelly Korda Deserves Her Caitlin Clark Moment, So Why Isn’t She Getting It?
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Jon

      3 years ago

      Played 18 late yesterday when course quiet with two balls, both new model Pro V1 and TP5. Amazing how similar they are – only difference I came across was sound from wedge with the Pro V1 soft sounding and TP5 a little clippy, which I don’t mind on a wedge as gives a little more feedback on strike. Both equally great balls in my opinion. Distance for me identical at 98-103 speed.

      Reply

      John

      3 years ago

      This information, along with the performance data that MGS provides, is great; however, my question is does your choice of ball based on this information really affect your score. After all, aren’t we chasing better scores? In my opinion, I pick a ball that feels good, provides good performance, and will last a round or two. There are probably more balls than I can count that would meet this criteria and would not affect my score even a little bit. As much fun as it is to test different golf balls, eventually you have to pick one and just stick with it. I think it’s more important to know how a ball is going to react when you hit it than to get an extra 10 yards or 1000 rpm’s of spin.

      Reply

      Captain Obvious

      3 years ago

      “You should play a Titleist golf ball.”

      “Thank you Captain Obvious.”

      Reply

      mackdaddy9

      3 years ago

      This info is very interesting. I have tested the following balls this year:
      Pro v1
      Pro v1x
      Z Star
      B xs
      Tp5
      Chrome soft

      I really like a soft feeling ball to a point. Around the greens the soft balls seem harder to judge distance, I tended to hit them to far. I guess the softer feel makes me feel like I should hit them farther. The B xs tended to spin the most for me, on full wedges they raced back to often an standard mid level flights, I can spin all the balls with a low flighted wedge and the Bridgestone’s seemed to spin the most. The Tp5’s are the longest for me but I don’t know why they just feel heavier off the face of a wedge than the others. The Z stars are nice for me as are the Pro v1 and Bxs balls. I liked the Pro v1x the best overall. I think the final choice was very highly impacted by the ball lab tests. I bought 8 dozen half are yellow and half are white. I prefer the yellow now that I have them but I originally wanted white. The Yellow is easier for me to track in the air at 60.

      Reply

      Paul McGinnis

      3 years ago

      Titleist, Taylor Made, Callaway, and the others are all making great balls now, at one time this wasn’t the case. My equipment is up to date, but I am most concerned with the ball and will not play cheap or found or even used balls. The Titleist AVX is the ball for me. The skin money I win playing them more than pays for them. I also enjoy the Callaway soccer balls and I used to never play a Taylor Made ball but they have stepped up their game and are making very good balls. Its all in the urathane cover.

      Reply

      Frank Cacciola

      3 years ago

      I was signed up to emails however haven’t been recieving

      Reply

      Ron

      3 years ago

      Hi Guys, love the data…… Interesting to see what people play and prefer in a market where everything is available. Here in Australia, the Big 4 (Titleist, Taylormade, Srixon and Callaway) have 99.9% of market-share. Snell, Vice are not easily available. By that I mean, you can buy from US suppliers over the net, but any price advantage goes out of the window due to postage (over US$30 for 3 dozen) plus Australian Government Taxes (10%). Costco has limited outlets, getting bigger, but very few see their Kirkland ball as a good option, mainly due to the thought-process “If it’s cheap, it cannot be that good”.

      Personally, I don’t like recommending balls, as it’s such a personal choice (your survey confirms that). When people tell me they play such and such a ball, my response is usually that any of the big 4 don’t make rubbish (except for the Q-Star Tour Indonesian plant debacle :) )., and if they are happy with it, well……. I think, you get what you pay for.

      Cheers from Aussieland. Love the data-driven research and the YouTube show. Happy golfing.

      Reply

      Terry

      3 years ago

      Thanks for the info Tony. I don’t see how someone could say survey results are wrong. The results are data – data is data. There may be differences in the interpretation of that data, but that doesn’t make it wrong. I also thought that not designating a currency or non-US pricing would impact feedback from our friends abroad as noted in the comments. Great job nonetheless!

      Reply

      Bill

      3 years ago

      I’m one of those that doesn’t buy golf balls because I get them for free. Our marketing guys are all golfers and their promo giveaways are ProV1’s or ProV1x’s. Probably have 8 dozen unopened boxes in my closet.

      Reply

      vince schiavo

      3 years ago

      Lucky sonofagun!

      Reply

      Rob

      3 years ago

      Paying over $50 for a dozen balls like the Z Star ($52) TP 5 ($70) Chromesoft ($60) ProV1 ($61) TourB ($53) is the only option for someone living in Thailand and most like any south east asian country. ????

      Reply

      The Golden R

      3 years ago

      Maybe an interesting reply and set of results would come from the question: If price was not a factor for you, which ball would you choose to play?

      Reply

      Greg P

      3 years ago

      I’m as price conscious as the best of you, but I can’t justify playing anything but the best. I have confidence in the quality and performance I get from Titleist. That’s important. False economy to save 50 cents a ball by playing anything else.

      Reply

      JD

      3 years ago

      I am shocked Maxfli Tour didn’t get more love here after performing well in both the MSG ball labs and the April 2019 MSG ball study. Those are the reasons I chose the Maxfli Tour and I am glad I did.

      Reply

      Jordy Evans

      3 years ago

      One area you didn’t ask about was whether you play specific ball based on a ball fitting.

      Feel to me is based on putter and wedge play, but might not be to others. You might want to define what feel means to you. Same with green side spin. How a ball reacts to a chip or pitch shot is how I interpreted that question.

      Thanks for the interesting surveys and reviews, keep them coming.

      Been a while since a most wanted fairway wood report. How about a most wanted hybrid category as well.

      Reply

      Regis

      3 years ago

      I play 3;times a week with a group and their ball choices and handicaps run the full spectrum. Lot of water and a lot of ball hawkers. I’ve learned King Neptune is oblivious to your brand and I never look for lost balls. I don’t like snakes. My two favorites are the original Taylor Made V3 Urethane (bought em in bulk) and the Cut Blue (also Urethane) .And the cool thing is all my balls are marked with a green line and a shamrock ☘️. These guys play anything that came to rest anywhere near they think their shot may have landed.and my abandoned ball eventually gets returned to me by the fastidious ball hawkers

      Reply

      Gary

      3 years ago

      Spin is tricky. I don’t know how good I am at creating spin around the green. I do OK but it’s not necessarily a strength. From 50 yards or so I can see the effect of the better spinning balls. I’ve preferred “softer balls” until I read soft is slow. Push comes to shove I like a ball that holds the line and goes off the tee. I’ve just wondered at driver if I am good enough to hold a tour ball in flight versus side spin and curving too much. I totally bought in on the idea that after spending $1k on a driver that $10 more per dozen for better balls is sound thinking. So for now I am playing ProV1x and liking it. I do like yellow balls, so that does influence my thinking. Not to crazy about the three lines on the Chromesoft LSX. So looks matters. I did play Snell and Vice but didn’t like the Snell and I’m not interested in “older technology” in DTC balls (using expired patents).

      Reply

      Tyler B.

      3 years ago

      Played most of these brands, OnCore’s Vero X1 , Snell MTB-X, Vice Pro Soft and for me, personally, for the price and overall quality of golf ball, prefer the OnCore Vero X1 ball over all of them. The price may be a little higher than Snell or Vice but seem to be more durable and not to scuff as easily.

      Reply

      RG

      3 years ago

      As someone that loved the Fathers Day Srixon BOGO deal every year (ZStar)….I might not bother this year. That’s how much Snell’s MTB Black has impressed me. It works better for me…and I will gladly pay for that.

      Never would’ve thought to try them (or Wilson Oncore Maxfli Vice) were it not for MGS…so Thanks for all the hard work.

      Reply

      Chris

      3 years ago

      I’m really not sure what this info is telling me..but I’m not a marketing expert. I feel like I could have guessed all of these numbers based on what I’ve read on MSG. The majority of avid golfers like white, urethane, Titleist golf balls..got it! I think that’s one of the reasons I play Bridgestone e12s and B RX’s…if I’m not in the fairway everyone I play with knows it’s mine and never has to ask what I’m hitting “here’s a Bridgestone….”. I’m sure the same is true for anyone NOT playing Titleist balls.

      Reply

      Mark

      3 years ago

      You can tell the readers who filled out the survey have been influenced by My Golf Spy, that is not a knock, just an observation, as none of these metrics matches what our retail sales at my shop see. We sell far more super soft callaway than we do pro v1, or chrome soft, or tp5, as far as tour balls go, pro v/X and chrome soft/X are about equal, with tp5 and bridgestones lines falling behind quite a bit and srixon even farther down the list until the fathers day promo comes out. For 3 years running chrome soft line has just inched out pro v line in our shop as top dog in the tour catagory, but supersoft still beats both of them. So the average golfer is still buying 2 piece cheaper balls than tour line at our retail location which is a high volume 3+ milliion a year shop.

      Reply

      JP

      3 years ago

      Thats super interesting, I am also in the golf retail world (mostly soft goods though) and so far my experience has been totally dependant on the type of facility and clientel.

      .It would have been interesting to maybe ask a “Whats your handicap” type question to see how the average MGS reader stacks up to the rest of the buying public – ex: MGS survey takers – 40% reported a handicap of 12 or lower vs US golf average of only 15% of players reporting below a 12 handicap – I would assume the average MGS reader is a more avid player and more invested into their equipment decisions.

      Marq

      3 years ago

      Great post. We find thousands of balls every year and super soft is definitely one of the leaders in terms of two-piece balls, and, in fact, among balls and general. Chrome softs have made noticeable inroads into Thai list over the past few years but we still find more pro v1’s than any other premium ball. However, this could just means that more people are losing pro v1’s than any other premium ball! (Maybe they should be playing a lower price ball for their pocket sake). The MGS numbers here, while it’s interesting to know what the reader say, the numbers regarding ball use are so NOT representative of the real world. Most people don’t break 90 & as shown above, only half use premium balls. So the MGS reader is definitely in a much higher tier regarding golfing skill than the average Joe or Jane.

      Jeffrey

      3 years ago

      Were Quantix balls considered in any way ?

      Reply

      Harry

      3 years ago

      I have used both Snell, OnCore & Vice. Based on my eyesite, I play yellow. They all play well for me (15 handicap). My only complaint is that the cover on the Vice tends to scuff more easily. Thanks for your survey.

      Reply

      Lou

      3 years ago

      10,600 is a great response! Congratulations. I was surprised at the number of readers who play Srixon given how lousy Tony thinks their golf balls are. I was struck, on the weekend, to get a recommendation email from Adam suggesting Srixon’s Buy 2, get 1 free sale. Why recommend a ball from a company that Tony thinks makes a crappy product? Lastly, MGS has marketed Snell balls from the get go so it’s no surprise at their ranking among the 10,000+ respondents. Titleist is the overall winner and anyone who plays a Titleist can soon after tell you why. They make the most consistent golf balls on earth. It will be interesting to see if you ever test balls again for performance. I am doubtful this will happen.

      Reply

      Chris Nickel

      3 years ago

      Lou – I guess I read it a bit differently. Yes, 10,000+ responses is fantastic, but I don’t think it’s fair to suggest that Srixon makes a universally crappy product. Would I play the Z Star XV? Nope.. And frankly, I wouldn’t play many balls in the Srxon line.

      But, the standard Z Star was one of only four balls rated “Excellent” in our last performance test and received an 82/100 in ball lab. I’d imagine quite a few golfers play that ball and enjoy it.

      And sorry to burst your bubble, but another performance test is in the works. Moving forward, maybe Thomas is a more fitting moniker.

      Reply

      Danie Maré

      3 years ago

      DTC balls aren’t available where I live. But I still glanced at the prices to see if again I get ripped off due the un-availability.

      For the life of me I could not understand why people will buy these. They just are not cheap enough to warrant the purchase on price alone. If they are not less than 50% than OEM’s , based on the number of balls I buy, it’s not even a round of drinks after a golf outing.

      I am glad the article allieds to this fact.

      Off course, buying them based on performance for an individual does make sense, but on price alone at 3 or 4 dozen or less a year, I just do not see the point. Wait for the OEM sale and they are the same price.

      Reply

      Lor

      3 years ago

      Well with regards to Oncore, I purchased the new Vero x1 (2 boxes) and they were not good, short off the tee, clicky feel, ok spin around the greens….. And more importantly they’re supposed to be a 4 piece ball, well after I realized I didn’t like the ball very much I cut open both dozen, every single one was 3 piece, EVERY ONE…… So they clearly have some sort of manufacturing issues going on.

      Reply

      Tyler B.

      3 years ago

      Why would you cut open all of your golf balls? Sounds like you work for one of their competitors, lol, that or you just like to burn money. Regardless, I played them and thought they were great. Different strokes for different folks I guess.

      Reply

      Lor

      3 years ago

      Honestly man, I was bored and thought it was a shit ball, seemed like a good idea at the time…. And it kinda was, clearly bought two bad dozen, and believe me, I was pretty shocked at what I found

      Tyler B.

      3 years ago

      Had a very different experience than you did and think they felt great. Did not have clicky sound which is strange for any golf ball. Didn’t notice any distance loss off the tee compared to any of the other brands, in fact, they felt noticeably longer. Who knows but maybe it had to do with the balls compression and your swing speed.

      Reply

      Lor

      3 years ago

      Honestly man, my swing speed really isn’t and issue, I tried as soon as I could, and I got two bad dozen…. Not really upset about it, I just threw my experience out there, I like the company and the brand, I just hope after I contacted them they contacted their ball plant and got it figured out.

      Pat. L. Sellers

      3 years ago

      You obviously don’t understand how golf ball are constructed. It is a 4 piece ball. Feel free to go to YouTube and watch how the different layers are constructed. In my opinion you should have done your homework before sounding off on that which you know nothing about.

      Reply

      Joe

      3 years ago

      I somewhat disagree with some of your survey results. I purchased 6 dozen Taylor Made Project “a” balls from eBay last September for $13.44 /dozen with shipping included. They had what they referred to as “Dad Ism’s” logos and all numbered #33. The logo and the numbering did not bother me in the least. The balls are a 72 compression which fits my swing. They arrived in Taylor Made packaging from their verified location. I think I made a great purchase.

      Reply

      John DeMotto

      3 years ago

      Yes, I too purchased those “Dadisms” balls and really enjoyed playing them.

      Reply

      Tom

      3 years ago

      After doing a ball fitting then taking that to the course, the 4 most likely best options for me were the V1X, Chrome Soft LS-X and X then the Bridgestone B-SX.

      Comparatively, Bridgestone won hands down for me when consistently comparing performance among the 4. I had never considered a ball fitting until this season. Something in the back of my mind knew it would be a good endeavor and so far, the results have backed it up.

      Reply

      tim

      3 years ago

      I love colored balls, especially red and orange in the summer, switching to yellow & green in the fall. I’m still trying to settle in on playing one ball but I like the TP5x, Snell MTB-X, Vice Pro Plus & Maxfli Tour balls. I think the TP5x and MTB-X are longer off the tee, but I like red (easier for me to track) and Vice is the only one to make a red urethane cover ball and also in green.

      Reply

      Matt

      3 years ago

      “First, if you’re paying more than $50 for a dozen balls, you’re probably doing it wrong.”

      Perhaps it goes without saying to some, because you are US based company, however if you could specify USD when asking questions such as this it may help hone the data. I’m Canadian and a box of Pro V’s is $65+tax (still over the $50 USD threshold, but that’s not a golf related issue).

      Reply

      Ed

      3 years ago

      Pretty sure I put Oncore as highly unlikely, but not because of the Wayne fiasco. For the longest I was a Titleist non-believer, thinking that the #1 ball in golf was a bunch of crap and solely reputation, adamant I can get by with any other urethane. So I went the cheaper route looking for the best deal while still being rated decent on both Ball Lab and the performance test. I went all in on the Elixr buy 2 get 1 free (3 cases at $60). I play yellow balls and theirs are bright and look fantastic, but immediately hitting them I could tell the feel was just off, results were often poor, and I was filled with regret having so many of them that I wasn’t gonna enjoy hitting. Wanted to like them… but no. Out of the DTC brands, I’ve definitely hit Snell MTBs better, and Vice the best, which surprised me as they came off more of a gimmicky, wanna be cool with young people brand, but the Vice Pros actually play really good.

      I’m totally on board with Titleist though. I still haven’t actually bought any (I’ve bought TaylorMade and Srixon but never ProVs), but friends have given my sleeves of theirs and man…. I’m not the best golfer but I feel like the results are better and more consistent than my ability should allow. Will be playing them and maybe also Vice in the mix from now on.

      Reply

      Scott

      3 years ago

      Your comments are interesting, Ed. I mainly play both TM (TP5/TP5X) and Srixon (Z-Star/XV) because I have been able to find deals on them and I play them pretty well. However, the MAIN reason is because I don’t want to spend $50 on a dozen ProV1s. Maybe I should try them once.

      Reply

      JP

      3 years ago

      –**^^BuT TonY WhAt BaLl Is BeSt FOr My SWinG SpeEd!?!?^^**–

      For all the hype and discussion there is about the more popular DTC brands (Snell,Vice, etc) I would have expected them to have a larger percentage of “Preferred Model”.

      Also I wonder how this is all skewed bc of the MGS readership – I would guess your averge golfer who isnt nerding out about core centered-ness and compression standards would start pushing driver distance and feel to the top of the importance chart.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Irons
    Apr 24, 2024
    PXG Irons: Model By Model
    Putters
    Apr 23, 2024
    PING 2024 Putter Line Extension
    News
    Apr 23, 2024
    Nelly Korda Deserves Her Caitlin Clark Moment, So Why Isn’t She Getting It?
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.