Ball Lab: TaylorMade TP5x Review
Golf Balls

Ball Lab: TaylorMade TP5x Review

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Ball Lab: TaylorMade TP5x Review

MyGolfSpy Ball Lab is where we quantify the quality and consistency of the golf balls on the market to help you find the best ball for your money. Today, we’re taking a look at the 2021 TaylorMade TP5x. An overview of the equipment we use can be found here. To learn more about our test process, how we define “bad” balls and our True Price metric, check out our About MyGolfSpy Ball Lab page.

an image of 2021 TaylorMade TP5x Golf Balls

About the TaylorMade TP5x

Of the two balls in the current TP5 retail family, the TaylorMade TP5x is billed as the higher-launching and lower-spinning. It’s also the firmer of the two though it’s not as firm as it used to be. A point of emphasis in the design of the new models was to remove any reasons not directly related to performance for golfers to choose one ball over the other.

The TP5 remains the only five-piece ball on the market from a major manufacturer. While its competitors would no doubt dispute it, TaylorMade’s position is that more layers provide greater opportunity to tune spin performance throughout the bag.

The manufacturing story remains a bit non-standard. You might even say odd. The cores and inner mantle layers are produced in Taiwan. The nearly finished balls are shipped to TaylorMade’s U.S.A. plant where covers are put on.

At last check, TaylorMade is sourcing cores from a couple of factories. While this can introduce some inconsistency, that’s not universally true. Our gauges will tell us if there are any issues.

TaylorMade TP5x—Compression

a chart showing the compression value of the 2021 TaylorMade TP5x

On our gauge, the new TaylorMade TP5x measures 91 compression on average. That’s down seven points from the previous generation.

Significant shifts in compression from one generation to the next are rare so it’s noteworthy when it happens. To give you a frame of reference, the compression change from the 2019 TP5x to the new model is roughly the same as the difference between a Pro V1x and the standard Pro V1.

Simply put, the new ball is appreciably softer. Anecdotally, it’s a bit shorter (though it’s by no measure a short ball). We suspect it spins more around the green and certainly feels a bit softer.

Vacating the higher end of the compression space where balls like the Titleist Pro V1x Left Dash and now the Callaway Chrome Soft LS live is an interesting decision, especially as golfers are becoming more aware of these options. To some degree, it feels a bit like TaylorMade is walking away from an emerging category where it was already one of the leaders.

My hunch … and it’s only that … is that TaylorMade is likely to release a higher-compression, lower-spinning offering later this year. By softening their mass-market offering, they’ve created space to be aggressive with a new ball.

TaylorMade TP5x—Diameter and Weight

None of the balls in our TaylorMade TP5x sample exceeded the USGA weight limit of 1.62 ounces.

Likewise, none of the balls in the sample failed to meet our roundness standard. In fact, not a single ball was close to challenging it. Simply put, there are no notable weight or diameter issues.

TaylorMade TP5x—Inspection

Centeredness and Concentricity

In total, we flagged six percent of our sample as bad. That’s only two balls which, while obviously not perfect, is a solid result. In one case, we observed a significant layer incursion. These occur when the inner layer hasn’t fully cooled before the next layer is added. Effectively, we’re talking about one layer melting into the next.

Minor incursions remain prevalent and this does seem to be an ongoing issue with TaylorMade, though, compared to the prior generation, they were neither as numerous nor as severe.

A second ball was flagged for a significant shift in the internal layers. Technically, the core was off-center, though the larger concern was a significant difference in the outer layer thickness from one side of the ball to the other.

a photo of the core of the 2021 TaylorMade TP5x golf ball

Core Consistency

While we did observe some minor bits of debris in the core, generally speaking, there was nothing of any real concern. Notable, though not necessarily an issue, were several variations in core color. The majority of the ball featured a bright red core like the one shown above. However, we also found a few balls with much paler cores.

Outer mantle colors ranged from pale green (above) to neon green. It’s rare to see variation in mantle colors but, again, our gauges provide the best insight into whether there’s a resulting inconsistency.

Cover

We noted no significant defects. Minor defects were limited as well and, other than a few pin marks left over from the painting process, there’s nothing much to note. That’s a good thing.

TaylorMade TP5x—Consistency

In this section, we detail the consistency of the TaylorMade TP5x. Our consistency metrics provide a measure of how similar the balls in our sample were to one another relative to all of the models we’ve tested to date.

While we do run into the occasional odd ball from TaylorMade, generally speaking, the consistency of the TP5 series is as good or better than most. With the new model, diameter and weight consistency fall within the Average range while compression consistency achieves a rating of Good.

a consistency chart for the 2021 TaylorMade TP5x golf ball

Weight Consistency

  • The balls in our first box were a bit lighter but not by any significant measure.
  • Except for one ball in box No. 2 that was a bit on the heavy side, the consistency of weight across the sample falls within the average range.

Diameter Consistency

  • As we’ve come to expect from TaylorMade, the TP5x qualifies as small. It’s fair to say the company finesses its way to meeting the USGA minimal requirement, but nevertheless, the entire sample conformed to the rules.
  • Box 3 was a tick larger on average but overall consistency was solidly within the average range.

Compression Consistency

  • Compression consistency across the TaylorMade TP5x sample was above average (what we classify as Good).
  • The compression delta across the sample was nine points. That’s one point better than the current database average.
  • The average compression delta (the compression range across the three points measured on each ball) falls on the high end of our average range. Notably, none of the balls showed more than a 2.5-point variation across any of the three points measured.

True Price

True Price is how we quantify the quality of a golf ball. It's a projection of what you'd have to spend to ensure you get 12 good balls.

The True Price will always be equal to or greater than the retail price. The greater the difference between the retail price and the True Price, the more you should be concerned about the quality of the ball.

TaylorMade TP5x—Summary

To learn more about our test process, how we define “bad” balls and our True Price metric, check out our About MyGolfSpy Ball Lab page.

The Good

  • Average to Good across all of our major consistency metrics.

The Bad

  • Persistent, though typically minor, layer issues.

Final Grade

The TaylorMade TP5x gets an overall grade of 82.

While we did find a couple of minor issues, there are no significant issues to dissuade you from playing the TaylorMade TP5x.

The “True Price” of the TaylorMade TP5x  is $50.77. That’s an increase of just six percent over retail.

Support Unbiased Testing.

DID YOU KNOW: If only 1% of MyGolfSpy readers donated $25, we would be able to become completely independent in 12-months. With every donation, you create change.

Would you be willing to help by giving a donation? Every dollar will help. Make a donation to support our independent and expert golf equipment research. A PayPal account is not required in order to donate.

Donate to MGS


Amount

Frequency

For You

For You

Golf Shafts
Apr 14, 2024
Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
News
Apr 14, 2024
A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
Drivers
Apr 13, 2024
Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      HARKSHARK

      2 years ago

      All this minute detail and yet you article says overall rating of 82 bit your chart you inserted said it’s rated as overall 75.
      Maybe your stories should match your charts.

      Reply

      Bryce Toledo-Lue

      2 years ago

      I’ve played the 2019 and currently, the 2021 TM TP5x. Recently, I had on ball go 78 holes and am currently on 72 holes with another.. Outside of a slight scuff, I don’t really see any decrease in playability. I’ll vouch for the new TP5x ball!

      Reply

      Tim

      3 years ago

      The only thing i dont get is the ratings…..but no big deal

      playability is a big thing to me…..i just played the new TP5X and its very mdiocre on the course for me…..its a different ball from the 2019 version but its a very boring ball…..does everything just ok…..nothing great……i bought a dozen and TM accidentally sent two……now im stuck with 2 dzn balls i will not use…..this is two versions of the tp5X i just dont like

      Reply

      Jeff

      3 years ago

      Feel free to send them my way. Wouldnt want you to suffer through them.

      Reply

      Glenn B

      3 years ago

      I have used the yellow version of the TP5X and would say that the covers on them are horrible. The paint seems to come off much easier on these balls than other yellow balls that I have played. Perhaps that should be factored into the “cover” evaluation.

      Reply

      Eric

      3 years ago

      Great to see this ball perform well!

      Reply

      Webster

      3 years ago

      These ball labs are nice and all; but until there is testing that shows how theses ‘defects’ actually affect performance, the results are rather meaningless.

      Reply

      Sooner999

      3 years ago

      Tony: As indicated by several comments below can you test and provide the results for the popular TM Tour Response ball. Thanks!!

      Reply

      WYBob

      3 years ago

      Tony: I heard you guys mention on No Putts Given that there will be a new ball performance test later this year similar to 2019. What would be valuable would be if that testing could be cross-referenced with the Golf Ball Quality Comparison Tool results. That would help answer the question of what effect the quality of the ball has on overall performance, and to what degree. Of particular interest is what impact does Centeredness & Concentricity have on dispersion. Just some random thoughts from the rough.

      Reply

      Rob V.

      3 years ago

      Love the new format on the Lab reviews, specifically the graphs showing where each ball result ended up in relation to all three boxes. I am anxiously awaiting some more Callaway reviews.

      Reply

      Mike

      3 years ago

      As always, great review. Crystal clear knowledge of the definitive metrics. One more thing…………..Are you saving the 2021 ProV1 as a grand finale?

      Reply

      Tony

      3 years ago

      Just say, for example, I bought a dozen of these balls (or any premium ball for that matter) and floated them in a basin of water to check concentricity … and let’s say that 3 of them rotated and 9 of them stayed neutral, would I be within my consumer rights to return the 3 non-concentric balls for replacement ? And, would the manufacturers accede to that demand ? Afterall, a ball that is not concentric is more likely to not fly as intended and more likely to get lost. That is why more often than not ‘finder’ balls get lost again quite soon ;-)

      Reply

      Steve Sheppard

      3 years ago

      Outer cover of TM balls seem to scuff and cut easily. Sounds like they’re making some progress with them though.

      Reply

      Steve Smith

      3 years ago

      Is there a visual difference (like Titleist uses arrow and dot discriminators) between the current TP5x and the 2019 version?

      Reply

      Rob

      3 years ago

      The first gen had lines on both sides of the TP5, gen 2 or 2019 had single arrows on both sides, gen 3 has double arrows on both sides of the TP5. The latest version was also pictured above.

      Reply

      Steve Smith

      3 years ago

      Thanks, checked a dozen I have and they are 2019.

      Eric

      3 years ago

      Played the TP for the last 3 years. Recently , cold day picked up the TM tour response , mid compression, and was I surprised. The ball flew and didnt do too bad a the short game side. For the money its a very good option. …….so far.

      Reply

      Terry

      3 years ago

      Thanks Tony for another great review. My 2021 Pro V1x balls just arrived, so I’m set for now, but looking forward to a possible new ball offering from TaylorMade.

      Reply

      Jim Reynolds

      3 years ago

      Good review, Tony. But I’m a little surprised at the low score based on only very minor issues.
      Last year, I tried a lot of difference balls, from the cheapest Top Flites to ProV1(x) and I settled on the Taylor Made Tour Response. and my game has become more consistent. I really like them (and I think I’m the kind of golfer TM designed them for). I know the TPX5(x) & ProV1(x) are theoretically “better” balls but I’m a mid to high handicapper so the extra $15/dozen isn’t really justified (for now). We’ll see if I continue to improve.
      BTW, I’d love for you to test & review the Tour Response. to see how it measures up

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      3 years ago

      I would describe the result as a low score.

      Not to get too far into the weeds, but the score is comprised of the good ball percentage along with each of the 3 consistency metrics. Consistency ratings are based on the consistency the ball is for each metric relative to the average of all ball models measured.

      For the TP5x, the good ball % was solid. Compression consistency was above average, while diameter and weight consistency were just average. Average isn’t bad…it’s just average.

      For context, the average score across all models graded so far is 71. With a score of 82, the TP5x faired significantly better than that and is currently a top 10 ball.

      Reply

      Ted Stickles

      3 years ago

      Would you play a ball outside the top 10? or is that something we should consider a break point of ball issues leading to potential scoring issues? some of the scores seem really low for balls that typically perform on the course. I wa sshocked to see the CSX with such a low score

      Tim

      3 years ago

      Tony mentions the left dash again……shocker LOl…….

      Reply

      Doug Hansen

      3 years ago

      You guys have obviously put a lot of work into this Consistency Project and that is awesome, I guess (pretty small deltas between top-played balls).. But, for me, I am more interested in optimizing how one brand over another will perform at my much-slower-than-Rory swing speed off the tee and also comparative analysis of spin rates on mid-pitch, chip shots and putting. Currently I am vacillating between Bridgestone RX-S and Callaway Chromesoft red/white Tru-Vis. The latter seem marginally shorter off the tee but marginally more spin-controlled around the green.

      Reply

      Dan

      3 years ago

      They published a huge study in 2019 comparing the performance of different golf balls (http://mygolfspy.com/most-wanted-golf-ball/) , and I imagine they will do another one. These ball lab tests are just measuring quality and consistency and serve a different purpose.

      Reply

      Sean

      3 years ago

      Can’t wait to see what the 2021 TP5 scores! Thank you Tony!

      Reply

      THOMAS2x617

      3 years ago

      Been playing these this year. The coating is way too brittle. I’ve gone through an entire box already.. Compared to the 2019 and 2020 model I had. These are a step backwards. The balls balloon more as well.. Although I did hit one 307 my pb… But my consistent is so dookie it don’t mean anything to me. Might have to fish more…????

      Reply

      Jim Lee

      3 years ago

      Great report. I have played the TM balls for many years. I like them a lot.
      Would it be possible if you can do a report on Honma golf balls? The six layer ball? Thanks

      Reply

      Barry Schwartz

      3 years ago

      Tony. another great Ball Lab review. I’m curious, what are the overall mean and average grades of all the balls that have been tested so far? You may have published this before but I don’t recall seeing it. It would help put in perspective a grade of 82 for this ball.

      Thanks for all the great work you do.

      Barry

      Reply

      Golfish!

      3 years ago

      Interesting results. I currently play the 2019 TP5 PIX ball with a handful of 2019 TP5X balls here and there. I just won 5 dz 2021 ProV1X balls in a contest so it will be interesting to see if I can feel and see a difference. Great test!

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Shafts
    Apr 14, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
    News
    Apr 14, 2024
    A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
    Drivers
    Apr 13, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.