BEST PERSONAL LAUNCH MONITORS 2022
Have personal golf launch monitors gotten more accurate over the years? Yes … but at a price.
For example, take industry leaders like Foresight, Bushnell and Full Swing. The Foresight GC3 retails for $7,499 and the Bushnell Launch Pro and Full Swing Kit retail for $3,999 each. But don’t despair if you’re on a budget!
In this buyer’s guide, we will be breaking down how various personal launch monitors perform as well as their ease of use, accuracy and, of course, recommending which performs best at different price points..
Best Golf Launch Monitor: Bushnell Launch Pro
Even though the Bushnell Launch Pro carries a hefty $3,999 price tag, it has outstanding performance across all metrics. The Launch Pro is on par compared to the GC3 and will save you $3,500. The Launch Pro can be used inside and out thanks to its built-in barometric pressure sensor. This means that whereever you’re playing, the unit will read how far you’re hitting it, taking into account altitude and weather. The only downside to the Launch Pro is that it is subscription-based model.
Whether you’re working on your short game or chasing higher ball speeds, the Bushnell Launch Pro is the best in the business.
- 1st in accuracy
- 8th in user friendliness
- 1st in features
- 4th in portability
How We Test
We're here to help you find the perfect personal launch monitor to fit your needs.
To do that, we put the leading devices in the category through a thorough and fully independent testing process that leaves no feature unexplored, no detail unchecked, and no stone unturned.
Our Metrics
To determine the accuracy and reliable of the data offered by the devices tested, we tested them side by side with an enterprise-class Foresight GCQuad launch monitor indoors and out. Foresight is trusted by the R&D teams at every major golf equipment company and is renowned for the accuracy of the data it provides.
The metrics we consider when rating Personal Launch Monitors include Accuracy, Ease of Use, Portability, and Features.
Every launch monitor we tested was compared to the Foresight GC Quad for our baseline.
Golf Launch Monitor Technologies
Most, if not all, launch monitors available today are powered by one of two technologies: radar or cameras.
Radar
Radar-based systems use Doppler radar to follow the flight of the golf ball. Doppler works by bouncing microwaves off an object: in this case, a golf ball. By continuously sending waves and receiving the reflections, Doppler-powered devices track the movement of the ball through space.
Enterprise radar launch monitors like TrackMan and FlightScope X3 feature larger Doppler radars which are capable of tracking a golf ball over its entire flight. Less expensive consumer-grade units like the Voice Caddie SC200 Plus and the Rapsodo have smaller Doppler units that don’t quite track the full flight of the ball.
With the exception of SkyTrak, Bushnell Launch Pro and Foresight GC3, all of the models we tested are radar-based.
Camera
As the category suggests, camera-based launch monitors use high-definition cameras to measure ball data at, and immediately following, impact. While camera-based systems can’t measure the full flight of the ball, they typically provide more accurate axis tilt and spin measurements and are far more reliable in limited-flight scenarios.
Depending on the quality of the cameras, some camera-based launch monitors struggle under certain lighting conditions and in highly reflective environments.
SkyTrak, Bushnell Launch Pro and Foresight GC3 are the only camera-based systems in this test.
BEST TECH - Full Swing KIT
Those who want all the features possible, look no further than the Full Swing KIT. It can be used inside and out, as well as customizing everything and anything you want with the unit or within the app.
Golf Launch Monitor Features That Matter
Metrics
All of the devices we tested provide ball speed, club head speed and carry distance. If you’re looking for club head data, offline and dispersion numbers, you might want to look at the enterprise solutions like ForeSight and Trackman.
Bushnell Launch Pro and Foresight GC3 are the most feature-rich launch monitors on the market. SkyTrak and Mevo Plus also provide an abundance of data offerings.
Accuracy
While you’re going to get the most accurate information from enterprise solutions like Trackman and Foresight, personal launch monitors offer reasonably accurate measurements.
The most accurate personal launch monitors are the Bushnell Launch Pro and Foresight GC3. For those who are looking for something at a more affordable price, the Rapsodo and the Mevo Plus are great options.
Ease of Use
For most of us, practice time is limited and it shouldn’t be wasted trying to configure, connect and use a device meant to help us improve faster. Some units require more precise placement at setup.
For the easiest of setups, Voice Caddie SC300, Voice Caddie SC300i and SC200 Plus get you practicing in no time. PRGR is easy to set up and collect data. Full Swing is simple and easy to use plus its customizable options outperform every other launch monitor.
Features
While measuring the flight of the golf ball is the primary purpose for all of the units we tested, most offer some additional features. Some allow for simulator play while others include features to record your swing or leverage GPS functionality on the golf course. Others add elements of gamification like long-drive contests and closest-to-the-pin challenges.
If you have the money, the Bushnell Launch Pro and Foresight GC3 offer games, range, courses, competitions and more. Both launch monitors graphics are good but Full Swing has higher-quality graphics. It truly feels as if you’re at the course.
Rapsodo is a perfect launch monitor to record your swing while getting some data. SkyTrak and Mevo Plus provide games, range sessions and courses to play, no matter the weather. Garmin G80 is not only a launch monitor but also a GPS device so you can get some numbers to your target and some data points.
Smartphone/Tablet Apps
While the Voice Caddie and Garmin offerings are self-contained, the other devices we tested require an app to communicate with the launch monitor and relay data to the user. We found the applications to be generally easy to navigate and hassle-free.
The Rapsodo MLM, Full Swing Kit, Bushnell, Foresight and Skytrak stand out for their simple interface and layout though Rapsodo proved to be a battery killer when taking swing videos.
BEST PERSONAL LAUNCH MONITORS 2022 - FEATURES
| Product | Mobile App | Weight | Outdoor/Indoor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Bushnell Launch Pro Check Price | YES | 5 lb | IN + OUT |
 | Ernest ES B1 Check Price | YES | 3 lb | IN + OUT |
 | Flightscope Mevo Plus Check Price | YES | 1 lb | IN + OUT |
 | Flightscope Mevo Check Price | YES | 7 oz | IN + OUT |
 | Foresight GC3 Check Price | YES | 5 lb | IN + OUT |
 | Full Swing Kit Check Price | YES | 4 lb | IN + OUT |
 | Garmin R10 Check Price | YES | 7 oz | IN + OUT |
 | Garmin G80 Check Price | YES | 4 oz | IN + OUT |
 | PRGR Check Price | NO | 4 oz | IN + OUT |
 | Rapsodo Check Price | YES | 9 oz | IN + OUT |
 | Skytrak Check Price | YES | 1 lb | IN + OUT |
 | Voice Caddie SC200 Plus Check Price | NO | 7 oz | IN + OUT |
 | Voice Caddie SC300 Check Price | YES | 1 lb | IN + OUT |
 | Voice Caddie SC300i Check Price | YES | 1 lb | IN + OUT |
EXPERT TIP - Practice with the Ball You Play
If your plan is to use a personal launch monitor to gain performance insights while banging limited flight, beat to hell, or generally inconsistent range balls, you're wasting both your time and money. Practice with the ball you play (or at least one that's similar) so the data you collect is consistent and meaningful.
Personal Launch Monitors – Top Five Takeaways
What’s Your Budget?
The price range for the units we tested ranged from less than $200 to just under $2,000. If you want enterprise-level accuracy and features (head data, for example), you’re looking at $7,499 for a Foresight GC3. If you go all out, you’re going to shell out $25,000 for a fully featured unit.
Indoors, Outdoors or Both?
If you’re going to use your launch monitor almost exclusively indoors, save your money for a SkyTrak. Consider buying used if you’re on a budget.
Those who want an affordable launch monitor indoors need at least eight feet of flight distance before the ball hits the impact net.
The best launch monitors for outdoor use are the Foresight GC3 and Bushnell Launch Pro. The Rapsodo for under $500 is your next best option.
If you’re splitting time between indoor and outdoor use, consider the Full Swing Kit as it performs well enough inside and better outside. Full Swing always makes updates to their technology which improves accuracy. You should also look at FlightScope’s Mevo or Mevo Plus at a lower price. They can handle either environment. The option to use metal dots can improve tracking a bit and the video features are well executed.
Business, Practice or Fun?
If you’re a fitter or teaching professional looking to leverage data, more than likely you’ll need to look at the enterprise solutions. Foresight GC3 or Bushnell Launch Pro offers some fitting capabilities and the bag-mapping feature (also available in the Rapsodo MLM) is impressive.
For recreational golfers looking to measure their distances, some of the $500 radar units do a reasonably good job. At the $500 price point, the most accurate unit we tested provides enough data points to help you improve and understand your game.
For those just looking to have a good time with their friends, units that offer games like closest to the pin or long drive may offer the most bang for the buck. Mevo, Rapsodo, SkyTrak and Voice Caddie include a selection of games that extends the capabilities of the device beyond just capturing data.
Depending On Your Needs
If you’re a golfer who wants the most metrics and most accurate readings, you’re going to have to pay for it. The Launch Pro and GC3 are the most accurate launch monitors. However, the Full Swing Kit isn’t too far behind and has improved considerably since its debut. Rapsodo provides a few data points but are accurate for those on a budget.
Most Accurate Golf Launch Monitor - Bushnell Launch Pro
If data accuracy is the most important thing to you, the Bushnell Launch Pro is the one for you. The unit, and the Foresight GC3 have the same accuracy but the Launch Pro is cheaper. So for you to save some money and to have the most accurate launch monitor on the market, look at the Bushnell Launch Pro.
Metrics
BEST PERSONAL LAUNCH MONITORS 2022 - METRICS OFFERED
| Product | Club Speed | Ball Speed | Launch Angle | Shot Tracer | Spin | Distance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bushnell Launch Pro Check Price | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Ernest ESB1 Check Price | YES | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES |
| Flightscope Mevo Plus Check Price | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Flightscope Mevo Check Price | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Foresight GC3 Check Price | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Full Swing KIT Check Price | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Garmin R10 Check Price | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Garmin G80 Check Price | YES | YES | NO | NO | NO | YES |
| PRGR Check Price | YES | YES | NO | NO | NO | YES |
| Rapsodo Check Price | YES | YES | YES | YES | NO | YES |
| Skytrak Check Price | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Voice Caddie SC200 Plus Check Price | YES | YES | NO | NO | NO | YES |
| Voice Caddie SC300 Check Price | YES | YES | YES | YES | NO | YES |
| Voice Caddie SC300i Check Price | YES | YES | YES | YES | NO | YES |
EXPERT TIP - On A Budget?
In 2020 we're starting to see a successful personal launch monitor take it's shape and for $500 you can reasonably expect some of these devices to give you information to help you in your game. The Rapsodo was more than 90% accurate on all data sets, with the exception of spin.
Personal Launch Monitors – More Tips
- Some of the golf launch monitors tested work better indoors while others work better—or exclusively—outdoors. Before you purchase a launch monitor, make sure you know where you’re going to use it.
- If you’re only going to hit a few dozen balls at a time, battery life may not be relevant. For longer sessions, especially when using video features, battery drain can be an issue.
- Golf launch monitors are a part of nearly every fitting experience. Don’t expect to fit yourself with a consumer-grade unit. They’re not consistent enough and don’t provide the necessary data.
- Personal launch monitors have improved dramatically but still have some room to grow. Models tested do a reasonably good job of measuring ball speed and launch angle for the most part. However, real spin measurements come at a cost.
- When collecting data for your irons or driver, make sure you use your gamer ball and not a range ball.
- The Skytrak performed well inside but when it was tested outside, it took three times longer to capture the data. Yes, the data was relatively good but it was very frustrating to capture the final data.
BEST GOLF LAUNCH MONITOR 2022 - RESULTS
| Products | Accuracy | User Friendly | Features | Portability | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bushnell Launch Pro Check Price | 1st | 3rd | 2nd | 7th | 95.5 |
| Foresight GC3 Check Price | 1st | 3rd | 2nd | 7th | 95 |
| Rapsodo Check Price | 3rd | 2nd | 4th | 4th | 91 |
| FlightScope Mevo + Check Price | 5th | 6th | 4th | 4th | 90.5 |
| Full Swing Kit Check Price | 5th | 1st | 1st | 7th | 90.5 |
| Skytrak Check Price | 4th | 6th | 4th | 7th | 88 |
| Garmin R10 Check Price | 5th | 3rd | 6th | 4th | 87.5 |
| FlightScope Mevo Check Price | 9th | 6th | 9th | 1st | 85 |
| Voice Caddie SC300i Check Price | 9th | 6th | 10th | 7th | 84.5 |
 | Voice Caddie SC300 Check Price | 11th | 6th | 10th | 7th | 83 |
 | Garmin G80 Check Price | 12th | 6th | 9th | 1st | 80 |
| PRGR Check Price | 12th | 6th | 12th | 1st | 79 |
Personal Golf Launch Monitors FAQ
Q: What’s the difference between a personal launch monitor and an enterprise solution?
A: Several thousand dollars and accuracy. Enterprise solutions like Foresight and TrackMan are more accurate and provide more data points.
Q: What data can I get from a personal golf launch monitor?
A: If you’re in the under-$2,000 price range, you can reasonably expect your launch monitor to give you ball speed, carry, launch angle and spin. If you’re looking for club head data, offline and dispersion numbers, you might want to look at the Bushnell Launch Pro and Foresight GC3.
Q: What is Smash Factor?
A: Smash factor is a common club performance metric. Several of the devices we tested provide this with varying degrees of accuracy. The Smash Factor formula is simple. It’s ball speed divided by head speed.
Q: Are all personal golf launch monitors accurate?
A: Not all are as accurate as enterprise solutions like Foresight and Trackman. But according to the results of our test, there are accurate units. The Foresight GC3 and Bushnell Launch Pro are very close to that of the GC Quad. The Rapsodo was more than 90 percent accurate on all data sets with the exception of spin.
*We may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site.
Terry
3 weeks agoI placed the PRGR with both Foresight GC3 and Trackman at the indoor golf facility. I found it recorded ball speed virtually exact every time. It was within 2 mph on club speed, not as accurate as ball speed but very good. That was it.
It doesn’t know direction, spin or launch angle. Therefore carry distance is a guess. Sometimes a good guess, most times not a good guess. It will never be consistently less or consistently more by a predictable amount, never.
The small personal units under $1000 are good for one thing: ball speed. If you are speed training, use them. If you are changing your swing and finding more center-face hits, smash factor is pretty good. That is it.
The units like Garmin R10 or Raspodo who say they do spin are getting very short measurements. The doppler is not tracking it very far. They might be slightly better, slightly.
To really know your carry distances, it has to be done indoors with high-end equipment hitting your own brand of balls. Buying a $4,000 unit to measure range balls is questionable. Using inexpensive monitors into a net with your own brand of balls is questionable. Golf is a 157 yard water carry to a pin at 163 yards with a trap at 170 yards. You have to know your 160-165 yard club. How are you going to know that?
Stephane G
1 month agoOnly problem I have with article is that there’s no mention of club head data so mos of the cheaper offering don’t belong in this review. Was Mevo+ Pro package considered? Mentioning courses has no place in this review as that’s a third party offering.. I use it and judging from other reviews It’s pretty much the only option if you want to do more than just play under 2k$… The Flightscope Software and feature set is unequaled and is essentially free. ex: Multi-camera w/ auto trim, D-plane data, training mode, web portal, etc. Even if R10 came out after I bought it.. I’d still buy Mevo+ for that alone.
Andrew the Great!
1 month ago“Every launch monitor we tested was compared to the Foresight GC Quad for our baseline”
Ok, but how did that baseline GC Quad compare to actual numbers? That is, when the GC Quad said “238-yard carry”, how did that 238 number compare to the *actual* carry?
Were any of the launch monitor distance numbers compared to actual distances walked off with a surveyor’s wheel or something?
Matt S
1 month agoI noticed that the Voice Caddie SC200+ was mentioned a couple of times in the text of the article but it’s not included in accuracy graphs(?).
Kyle Coates
1 month agoIs it really fair to judge accuracy of GC3 and Bushnell vs. the rest of the field in comparison to GCQuad? Seemingly they use the same algorithms and measure things in exactly the same way.
I know there are differences in how trackman vs. GCQuad read certain elements i.e. when club head speed is determined, so I would assume things like mevo, fullswing etc. won’t be reading the metrics exactly the same way as all of the foresight family does.
ChristianR
1 month agoI purchased R10 basically at day one, and it must be the best value winner considering it gives you a “mini-Trackman” under 600$.
Was not perfect and still not, but got tons of improvement with firmware updates, lot of metrics, simulator, data analysis and so on…unless you’re a Pro it’s more than enough.
C’mon, PRGR it’s only good for speed training, and also Swing Caddies (I owned SC200) are toys.
Rapsodo it’s overrated and that Android thing it’s ridiculous.
Mevo plus cost 4 times the R10 and you have to put metal stickers on the balls.
When you consider the whole thing, it’s easy to consider the R10 the best quality/price ratio.
TJ
1 month agoDoes anyone know if it’s possible to hook up / stream a Rapsodo to a TV via your iPhone?
I already have an indoor net and TV setup. If possible, seems like the best value for accurate indoor practice.
Thanks
Mike W
1 month agoI have a Garmin R10 and love it. I’m wondering which firmware version you tested with? Also, I know that 3rd party add on software gives better numbers.
Jay
1 month agoOne thing they don’t mention is that the Bushnell is a GC quad literally in different Branding.i believe the company that bought Bushnell owls GC quad
Matt S
1 month agoTechnically the Bushnell LP is the same as a GC3, not a GC Quad, but yes, same just with different branding. Vista Outdoors (parent company of Bushnell) bought Foresight last year. Hit ’em long and straight!
Christopher
1 month agoThey are (but I think you mean GC3?), one is more prosumer (Bushnell) whilst the other is unlocked and doesn’t require subscriptions. The Quad has an extra camera for more club data along with putter analysis.
Dr Tee
1 month ago3 or 4 years ago I picked up an SC200 for less than $250. The 300i gives a little more data. Sure it doesn’t have all the bells and whistles, but for typical serious recreational golfer use it gives me all I need–ball and clubbed speed, smash factor, carry distance at an incredibly low price point. . And–I get immediate voice feedback so I don’t need to fool around trying to pair it or look at a tiny smart phone to see my data. I don’t need to store my data–I can actually use my own brain to remember, for example, that I am hitting my 7 iron 140 yards when my launch monitor tells me that information or close to it on 8 or 9 out of 10 or 20 balls.
Dave
1 month agoAny news of the new G80? I’m assuming it’ll be called G82?! The Garmin G80 has been out for well over 3 years now. Surely a new model is due any-day now?
Jordan Roy
1 month agoInteresting review. Would love to actually all the numbers and how they compare in the specific environment you test at. I agree with the Mevo+ backspin number with RCT balls. However I switched them with those stickers in the package and results was very impressive. That is the only downfall but when used correctly it is just as accurate as the Bushnell. To each their own I guess..
Rey
1 month agoWas the Mevo plus that was used in the test have the pro package?
Crovet
1 month agoHarry – you can’t make every body happy, even the always happy Coach Lockey. I was mildly disappointed to see SkyTrack finish in the middle of the pack. I bought one four years ago and you know what? I’m super-happy.. There is a slight pause to display results but you get accustomed to it.
Harry Nodwell
1 month agoSkytrak is still a good product. As time evolves, so is technology and companies are becoming more accurate and have better features.
Craig
1 month agoSkyTrak did finish middle of the pack, but look at the metrics that really matter, accuracy, where it finished high. I think 90% of the points should go to that metric alone.
jeff
1 month agoStill shocked that year after year Rhapsodo does not make an android compatible version.
sam
1 month agoI owned the Garmin R10 and it was a useless toy. It was one of the most disappointing golf purchases I ever made. Good thing it was in hot demand and I sold it for what I paid for it.
Mark
1 month agoSam,
Sorry to hear the R10 did not work out for you. We have “TopTracer” at a range near me, and my R10 and the TopTracer are within a couple of % of each other on everything. The R10 is very sensitive to accurate set-up, being too close to highly reflective concrete surfaces (give false reflections), and other microwave interference. It has also improved noticeably with software up-dates.
For the price I’d place it about the MEVO+ as it is 99% as good as the MEVO+ for a fraction of the price.
As a side note I’ve never had the “the ball went the other way” issue with my R10, and I play left-handed, so I’m not sure what might case this issue…?
Anyway, I’d 100% recommend the R10 as the best unit at that price point.
John
1 month agoI’ve read a lot of reviews on the Bushnell. Even on their site they have many negative reviews.. setup difficult and glitches. Said it is good when it works but is glitchy. That is why I never pulled the trigger. I also read that the GC3 is the way to go long term as there are no additional subscriptions
Harry Nodwell
1 month agoI didn’t experience any glitches from the Launch Pro but those comments might have been before the updates. The GC3 doesn’t have any subscriptions which is a positive but if you pay the highest subscription model year after year it would take you 4/5 years to reach the GC3 total. I would be my house that there will be more PLM for cheaper that is just as accurate in 4/5 years so you could sell the Bushnell and save yourself some money. Just a thought
PoolBrews
1 month agoI don’t understand how the Flightscope Mevo+ ranks lower in every category than the Garmin R10, yet ends up with a higher score and is considered the best unit under $2,000. The Garmin is far less expensive, yet according to your data is more accurate, more user friendly, more portable and equal in features.
Harry Nodwell
1 month agoThe Mevo+ and the R10 were the same for accuracy and portability. The Mevo+ had better features where the R10 was better in user friendly. Each category was weight differently and reflects in the overall results. The R10 has improved with updates but struggles with side angle and has the ball going the opposite directions from time to time
PoolBrews
1 month agoI find it interesting that the rankings for the two units changed from when I initially posted my comment and now. Several hours ago, this same site showed the R10 ranked higher than the Mevo+ in every category except for features – where they were both tied at 5th. Now nearly every ranking has changed in the results, and it shows features for Mevo+ at 4th instead of 5th, and the R10 at 6th instead of 5th.
I’m assuming that the initial chart was incorrect, and is correct now.
Largechris
1 month agoBut you haven’t tested for side angle, how can you conclude that?
All the YouTube video reviews are very unconvincing on Rapsodo side angle measurement.
Metrics, data please.
Kerry
1 month agoHow does the skytrak end up below the Mevo+ when it is more accurate,more feature rich, and ties on everything else except for being 1 spot lower in portability? That doesn’t seem to make sense.
Harry Nodwell
1 month agoThe skytrak was slightly better for accuracy but not much. Every other metric was tied but Mevo+ was better for portability. During testing, the Skytrak didn’t pick up the ball that much outside because of the sunlight. It took a long time to collect the data.
Patrick Wilson
1 month agoI have the VC S300. Was enjoying it using basic things. Swing speet, and carry. As game improved, I noticed that it would not pick up the backspin on any irons above an 8 iron. Sent in an email and guess what they said? “It will not pick up” Wondering if you had this same problem?
Harry Nodwell
1 month agoWe noticed that some of PLM (radar based mostly) struggle to pick up spin and end up guessing. This normally happens inside but a glare of sunlight can throw off the calculations also. Within a few years, technology will get better and so will the accuracy of the units and hopefully bring the price down making it more affordable for the everyday golfer.
Martin Brown
1 month agoI believe none of the units priced less than the Skytrak measure side spin / spin axis. For me this makes those lower-priced units essentially useless. I’m surprised the article doesn’t mention the importance of spin axis; without it, there is no way to measure the curve of a shot — surely a critical parameter for most amateur players. This capability in the Skytrak clearly makes it worth the extra money.
largechris
1 month agoThe R10 measures start direction and deduces side spin for curve, including into a net, the Rapsodo is supposed to do so but I’ve not yet seen a video proving it does this into a net. I agree left / right measurement is critical and it’s unfortunate it wasn’t a part of this test.
Wilson Player
1 month agoI can’t see how Mevo+ is placed higher than skytrack.
Was it simply because it is a tiny bit more portable?
Your own testing on the site shows the Mevo+ backspin numbers are crap.
Worst on PW and Driver. just the two most used parts of the bag (wedges and driver)
David
1 month agoprobably because skytrak is only able to be used indoors and has been on the market for 7 years with no real improvements.
ChristianR
1 month agoWell sounds weird the curve is a critical parameter for an amateur…maybe for those who are scratch or near scratch.
Kevin
4 weeks agoWhen outside the Rapsodo has never once showed me the wrong ball flight, the shot tracer is always correct.
Not tried it into a net but since it’s only tracking a short flight it will probably have to guess and get it wrong from time to time.
Accurate spin metrics come at a price though. If I was only ever hitting into a net then a Skytrak is the minimum I would want.