L.A.B. Golf vs. Odyssey Zero-Torque Putters: What The Data Actually Shows
Buyer's Guide

L.A.B. Golf vs. Odyssey Zero-Torque Putters: What The Data Actually Shows

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

L.A.B. Golf vs. Odyssey Zero-Torque Putters: What The Data Actually Shows

When we ran our 2025 Most Wanted Zero-Torque Putter test, two brands generated the most interest: L.A.B. Golf and Odyssey.

Both entered testing with strong reputations. L.A.B. has built its identity around Lie Angle Balance technology and stability. Odyssey brought its Ai-ONE Square 2 Square lineup into the zero-torque category, adding a familiar name to a rapidly growing segment.

It’s not often we get to test multiple models from both brands under the same controlled conditions, especially across 10,880 total putts using PuttView. Here’s what the data shows.

At a glance: The numbers

Remember, with PuttView Handicap, a more negative number is better—it means the putter performed strokes below the benchmark.

ModelOverall HCPShortMediumLong
L.A.B. Golf OZ.1i-7.6-8.1-5.8-8.7
L.A.B. Golf OZ.1-6.3-6.4-5.5-7.2
L.A.B. Golf DF3-4.9-5.4-3.8-5.0
Odyssey Ai-ONE S2S Jailbird-5.4-5.1-6.0-5.5
Odyssey Ai-ONE S2S DW-4.8-3.0-3.3-9.6
Odyssey Ai-ONE S2S Max Stripe-3.6-2.3-2.7-7.1

Short putts create the separation

Short putts have the greatest impact on PuttView Handicap. Misses from four to eight feet influence scoring more than misses from longer range.

L.A.B.’s short-range results:

  • -8.1
  • -6.4
  • -5.4

Odyssey’s short-range results:

  • -5.1
  • -3.0
  • -2.3

That gap is the clearest point of separation between the brands in this test. If your priority is performance inside eight feet, the data favors L.A.B.. For many players, the concept of more consistent short putts is the main motivation for switching to a zero-torque putter.

Long-range performance is competitive

Odyssey’s Ai-ONE S2S DW produced one of the strongest long-range scores in the entire test at -9.6. The separation in performance wasn’t as large as we saw in the short putts. L.A.B.’s best long putters were the OZ.1i at -8.7.

From a lag putting perspective, both brands show the ability to control speed and proximity effectively.

Depth across the lineup

If you take a minute to compare the brands as a whole, rather than looking specifically at individual models, the L.A.B. had better overall performance in the test.

Where each brand finished

BrandModelOverall FinishOverall PuttView HCP
L.A.B. GolfL.A.B. Golf OZ.1i1st-7.6
L.A.B. GolfL.A.B. Golf OZ.1T6-6.3
L.A.B. GolfL.A.B. Golf DF315th-4.9
OdysseyOdyssey Ai-ONE S2S Jailbird11th-5.4
OdysseyOdyssey Ai-ONE S2S DW16th-4.8
OdysseyOdyssey Ai-ONE S2S Max Stripe17th-3.6

The top-performing L.A.B. model finished first overall and its second model remained inside the top third of the field. Odyssey’s strongest performer landed mid-pack while its other two models finished near the bottom.

Final thoughts

Zero-torque putters as a category were tightly grouped in 2025. The overall spread from first to last was just four strokes of PuttView Handicap.

If you want to see how all 17 models performed, including Bettinardi, TaylorMade and others, you can read the full Best Zero-Torque Putters of 2025 results.

img

MyGolfSpy Testing Toolkit

World-class testing requires world-class equipment. This is the gear we trust to help us fulfill our Most Wanted testing.

For You

For You

Instruction
Jun 9, 2026
If You Still Play Long Irons, Copy This Thought From Ludvig Åberg
PLM 2025_Most Wanted_Foresight GC3 PLM 2025_Most Wanted_Foresight GC3
News
Jun 9, 2026
College Golf Tournament Prep Looks Nothing Like It Did When I Played
News
Jun 9, 2026
The Best Father’s Day Golf Gifts That Won’t Break the Bank
Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz

Britt Olizarowicz is a scratch golfer, former teaching professional and one of MyGolfSpy’s leading voices on equipment testing and golf performance. She has spent more than 15 years working at private clubs in New York and Florida and now specializes in translating test data and swing mechanics into practical advice for everyday golfers. Britt began playing at age 7 and has never left the game. When she’s not writing, you’ll find her on the course, playing pickleball, cooking, running or out on the boat with her family.

Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Vito

      4 months ago

      I would love to see an old Tommy Armour ZAAP putter do against these models. It was one of the earlier ZT putters.

      Reply

      TERRY HAYES

      4 months ago

      I have purchased a LAB DF3 and Odyssey S2S jailbird, Taylormade SpiderTour #3 and Wilson Buckingham in the past 18 months all from Global Golf. I have returned the LAB, TM and Odyssey, still have the Wilson. The LAB felt too light and Odyssey required too much of a forward press for me, Spider felt great but the Wilson makes more putts for me and is a great lag putter also. In my constant search I just purchased the Lazrus Zero Torque putter head and put the KBS CT Tour shaft ($30) in it today. The price of the head is $127 and $207 for the assembled putter. Not any way to change the lie angle etc. At this price point the value is outstanding (Made in the USA) It will be interesting to see how it performs.

      Reply

      Phill

      4 months ago

      Can you add the Sotty Cameron OC models to the comparison?

      Reply

      Mark R

      4 months ago

      I haven’t seen that many PGA Tour Pros making the switch to a center shafted zero-torque putter. Some, but not many. If ZT was really that good, all pros would be on board.

      That tells me it’s just marketing hype from manufacturers that want to sell putters.

      Reply

      NCGolfer

      4 months ago

      Referencing the “sincere question” the real question should be is what is the benchmark? If one wants to determine what the potential impact to their game is how would that be accomplished based on the metrics provided?

      Reply

      John

      4 months ago

      Controversy over golf equipment rages on. Let’s be frank, how much do you want to spend to lower your handicap a couple of strokes? I certainly would like to have the best equipment money can offer but at the end of the day does it really matter? Practice with what you have, be happy, and go out and enjoy the game.

      Reply

      Lefthack

      4 months ago

      Call me old fashioned but I could never see myself playing something that looked like a LAB or any other goofy putter. I have 4 blade putters and 2 mid mallets and the mid mallet is as close as I get to an actual mallet. I will say the LAB doesn’t look as bad as the Spider, but still.

      I also would never use an arm lock or broomstick for basically the same reason.

      Reply

      Lloyd Davis

      4 months ago

      A sincere question: assuming my current putter has an overall handicap rating of 0.0, and I’m a 12 handicap, what can I realistically expect from a putter with a -7.6 overall handicap rating to do on my average score? (I doubt that it’s going to drop my handicap to a 4.5, but just trying to understand how to translate that rating into results on a round of golf with friends.) Thanks!

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Instruction
    Jun 9, 2026
    If You Still Play Long Irons, Copy This Thought From Ludvig Åberg
    PLM 2025_Most Wanted_Foresight GC3 PLM 2025_Most Wanted_Foresight GC3
    News
    Jun 9, 2026
    College Golf Tournament Prep Looks Nothing Like It Did When I Played
    News
    Jun 9, 2026
    The Best Father’s Day Golf Gifts That Won’t Break the Bank