Drivers

2018 Most Wanted – The Best Driver For HIGH Swing Speeds (105+ mph)

BY MyGolfSpy
Apr 12th 2018
Read all comments

INDEPENDENT & UNBIASED

MyGolfSpy accepts $0 advertising dollars from any of the major golf manufacturers. We believe in always putting #ConsumerFirst.

245

Hours
Researched

25

Products
Considered

10,071

Shots
Hit

20.4m

Readers

What makes one driver better for one golfer over another? What key metrics in a golfer’s swing influence the way equipment performs?

The desire to capture more data is why we expanded our test pool to 35 golfers and collected more than 10,000 shots. The more we know about the performance of each of the 25 drivers in our test, the better we can help narrow your choices. Whether you’re an off-the-rack buyer, a guy who’s constantly tweaking your gear, or someone who is going to take the time to get fitted by a knowledgeable professional, we’re here to help you.

As we’ve done in the past, for 2018, we’re again segmenting our data to provide more meaningful information to the individual golfer. We’ve broken down our driver test results into three different swing speed categories. Today, if you’re a high swing speed player (105+ mph), this data is for you.

While overall results for the Most Wanted Driver test yield small differences – the high swing speed group showed a whopping 16 yards of difference between the longest and shortest drivers.

ADVANCED GOLF ANALYTICS

Data matters. And when it comes to finding the right equipment, it’s critical. We help solve this by applying the largest connected set of head-to-head data to tackle one of golf’s biggest challenges.

All testing was conducted inside our fully independent test facility located in Virginia. All testers used Bridgestone Tour B-RX golf balls for consistency and to reduce test variables. All ball and head data were collected using Foresight Sports GCQuad Launch Monitors. This comprehensive dataset was then run through our proprietary Most Wanted Rankings methodology. What we have developed is the most comprehensive test to determine the leaders in the driver category.

For more information, check out our How We Test page.

HOW WE CONSIDER PERFORMANCE

Each year we work hard to improve our testing methodologies from the previous test. In 2018, we’ve added yet another building block – statistical significance. Our Most Wanted winner is the club that finished in the statistically significant top group (based on Strokes Gained Driving) for the highest percentage of our testers. To simplify things a bit, we call the final order TRUERank; a metric that includes the order of finish (rank), along with the percentage of golfers for whom each club was shown to be in the top group.

For those interested in breaking out the individual components that make up total performance, we still provide you with club speed, distance (total yards and carry), and accuracy (offline/yards from center).

Be sure to check out the sortable tables to find the best driver that fits YOU.

RESULTS:

TRUERank: Swing Speeds (105+)

Club	Ball Speed	Launch	Spin	Carry	Total	Offline	Shot Area	TRUERank
Callaway Rogue Sub Zero	154.78	13.19	2,286	263.45	278.22	18.56	3257	1 (50%)
Mizuno ST180	153.52	13.53	2,360	262.48	276.93	18.59	3103	2 (40%)
Callaway Rogue	154.99	13.02	2,320	261.05	276.06	18.67	3181	2 (40%)
TaylorMade M4	154.42	13.54	2,574	259.5	274.2	15.71	3159	2 (40%)
PING G400 LST	155.73	13.05	2,514	263.61	277.45	17.18	3214	2 (40%)
TaylorMade M3 440	154.25	13.27	2,276	261.67	275.63	20.26	3569	6 (30%)
TaylorMade M3	153.92	13.15	2,277	260.99	275.55	19.04	3265	6 (30%)
Cleveland Launcher HB	153.11	13.24	2,505	256.26	269.99	18.54	2828	6 (30%)
Tour Edge HL3	153.04	12.41	2,320	257.65	272.73	18.81	3754	6 (30%)
Cobra KING F8+	153.71	13.76	2,432	259.45	272.39	21.49	3320	6 (30%)
Titleist 917 D3	153.45	13.31	2,381	260.73	274.61	19.58	3678	6 (30%)
Cobra KING F8	154.71	13.57	2,612	257.03	270.64	17.46	3663	6 (30%)
Wilson Staff C300	152.61	12.76	2,085	257.47	273.5	18.91	3160	13 (20%)
PING G400 Max	155.4	13.82	2,630	263.39	275.31	19.54	2700	13 (20%)
Bridgeston Tour B XD-5	152.09	13.31	2,570	255.46	268.44	20.77	3816	13 (20%)
Mizuno GT180	154.03	13.5	2,610	257.9	271.96	18.69	2444	13 (20%)
Vertical Groove Driver	153.47	13.72	2,400	260.32	273.42	21.1	3274	13 (20%)
PING G400	154.76	14.17	2,671	260.44	274.1	18.13	3372	13 (20%)
Wilson Staff D300	154.36	12.92	2,191	259.98	276.42	16.65	3483	13 (20%)
Titleist 917 D2	155.06	13.13	2,542	261.71	274.82	20.14	3416	13 (20%)
XXIO X	155.77	13.5	2,844	258.51	270.29	20.96	3151	21 (10%)
VEGA RAD-04	154.94	12.89	2,336	262.82	275.99	20.28	3090	21 (10%)
PING G400 SFT	155.44	13.38	2,760	257.95	270.7	20.28	3815	21 (10%)
Cobra F Max	151.62	14.84	2,990	250.18	262.49	18.87	2282	21 (10%)
Tommy Armour TA1	154.38	12.46	2,358	259.69	273.53	18.57	3645	21 (10%)

For You

Drivers

Sep 25, 2023

New: Mizuno ST-G Drivers

a closeup of the sole plate on the Mizuno ST-G Titanium fairway wood.

Fairway Woods

Sep 25, 2023

Mizuno ST-G Titanium Fairway Wood

Golf Wedges

Sep 23, 2023

Testers Wanted: Edison Wedges

MyGolfSpy

Our mission is #ConsumerFirst. We are here to help educate and empower golfers. We want you to get the most out of your money, time and performance. That means providing you with equipment reviews you can trust, as well as honest reporting on the latest issues affecting the game today. #PowerToThePlayer

MyGolfSpy

USA vs Europe: TaylorMade Stealth 2 Drivers

Sep 15, 2023 | 6 Comments

Ping G430 SFT Driver vs Ping G425 SFT

Sep 14, 2023 | 6 Comments

37 Golf Terms Everyone Should Know

Sep 11, 2023 | 3 Comments

Our Favorite Golf Shoes are 50% Off

Sep 1, 2023 | 1 Comment

MyGolfSpy

Driver Ping G30	Hybrids PXG 0317
3/4 IRON PXG 0311XF	5-GW Srixon Z 565
SW PXG 0317	LW PXG 0311
Putter EVNROLL

MyGolfSpy

comments

Join The Discussion

robert earl

4 years ago

Maybe I’m repeating what others have said earlier but how about testing against prior year winners? It would be enlightening to see how much improvements in the latest in golf technology surpass earlier models, if at all.

Al

4 years ago

How about doing a review of drivers for us old guys with swing speeds of less than 80 mph.

Bob Pegram

5 years ago

I am surprised the HL3 from Tour Edge was used for a high swing speed test. That is considered a game improvement model more than their EX10 model.

sam

5 years ago

It would be very interesting to see the test of the same clues with swing speeds of 90-105 and use the same ball and then a faster swing ball..
What surprises would data show up??? well done MGS

Jeff Parker

5 years ago

i would love to test the clubs

JP

5 years ago

I wish you didn’t lump the 105-110 with the 120’s .

Ron

5 years ago

I’m curious why the Epic driver isn’t included in these comparisons. Isn’t the epic a current year production driver?

Preston

5 years ago

Howdy. Id love to see Srixon in the mix. Just picked up a used 765 with oban white shaft. I can roll the ball for the first time in my life! As painful as it was to bench my old sasquatch tour(307yardscarry); I knew the time had come to upgrade. I tried the epic spun out way too much with any and every shaft at 130mph. Had great smash factor. Enjoyed the data as usual. “I’LL KEEP DIGGING HOLES”

Jason

5 years ago

For me, the 565 is still beating out the Rogue Sub Zero for dispersion. Distance wise, it is not even close. The Rogue is the hottest face I have ever hit. High on the face, Mid launch bomber. The bottom of the face has the forgiveness of a Cobra F6. Compared to my Srixon the Srixon wins. I am not the best golfer but the 565 can be hit from the fairway easier than some 3 woods. It is a beast.
For a driver, it’s hard to find a club as versatile as the Srixon. It is 2 years old at this point, which is likely why it is absent on this test.

Corey

5 years ago

Really ready to see the CG location report. That’s what I look forward to every year. Coming soon?

Berniez40

5 years ago

First off–I want to say thanks to MGS for providing all of this data. Secondly I’d like all the knuckleheads who keep posting “just go buy one off the rack if it feels good, because they are all the same…” to Silence Think Focus and Use their skills (STFU for short).
It is because of this site that I finally figured out that that very advice was costing me a boatload of dollars I didn’t have in my search for the right clubs.
Now admitteldy, the Srixon Z355 Irons I have in my bag are the only clubs I pack that got great press from MGS, but it was by watching the Data, such as driver spin etc., and learning what it was a club fitter would talk to me about actually meant. After getting fitted for my clubs, and able to converse with my fitter intelligentyly—-thanks to MGS—I took several strokes off my game. Admittedly, I have to follow Hogan’s advice for more strokes, and find the answer in the dirt, but at least now my clubs are tools that work for me, rather than inanimate oblects of which I have little understanding. You Rock MGS—and that’s why I donate to a winning cause.

Anonymous

5 years ago

I was pleasantly surprised with the Wilson’s data during my last range session.

Greg

4 years ago

Very good report just proves people are not fooled and are buying the No 1 selling driver. Would love some data on switching the head weights from front to back on the sub zero if you did that.

Anonymous

5 years ago

I don’t think one is faster than the other , I do believe one can drive the ball father than the others. I hit all the new drivers PingG400 , Taylor Made M3 and the Rogue. The Callaway Rogue went about 5 to 7 years further but the M3 stayed on line 90% of the time. The G400 felt great and performed like the old G20. I went with consistency down the middle and purchased the Taylor Made.

Clay

5 years ago

Thanks MGS for all that you do. You provide a lot of free information that IMO gives readers an excellent starting point going into the fitting process. For readers unable to get fit you also provide clubs that statistically should fit the greatest number of golfers in a given swing speed range.

It seems like a lot of people give back nothing but criticism and complaints in exchange for this free data and then ask for more free data in the same post, but I want you to know the silent majority really appreciates the work you put into this.

GolfCodeWeekly *WIN FREE GOLF

5 years ago

It would be nice to see some more lesser brands on the testing

I could live the rest of my days without seeing driver tests with Callaway Et Al and a token club or two thrown in.

Plus, it would nice to see what their extra pricing v the NON OEMs gave you

I know VERT GROOVE AND TOUR EDGE are in there, but there are 50 driver brands that never see the light of day on these tests

Brian Smith

5 years ago

The Forgan I have, 12* loft, stiff shaft 1/2 inch longer than standard goes further and straighter than any driver I have hit in the last 50 years of playing.

Johnny Penso

5 years ago

In 1980 when I took up the game, the best way to get better at golf was to practice efficiently, play a lot and take lessons if you have the time/money/inclination to do so. This and the other tests reveal that this is still the case with perhaps the added caveat of getting fitted but IMO getting fitted really only makes a tiny difference in scoring, if at all, assuming you are already playing with clubs that are generally suited to you and your game.

mackdaddy

5 years ago

Looks good but seems like we have a big speed gap between the fast and slow tester speeds.

Mike

5 years ago

For free content, there sure are a lot of complainers here.

Thanks for the data breakdown MGS!

MyGolfSpy

5 years ago

Thanks for the comment Mike. Happy to provide the data breakdown.

Randy

4 years ago

You guys are the Best there is…I wish I had this type of data back when I started playing golf. You got no complaints from me…Semper Fi.

Bob Pegram

5 years ago

Why were the RX Bridgestone balls used? They are for lower swing speeds than 105.

Tony Covey

5 years ago

Minimizing variables is important, so we use the same ball in every test. The RX is Bridgestone’s best-selling ball, which is why we use that particular model.

Chad M

5 years ago

It’s nice to know that they are basically all the same. no one, even the pros, are consistent enough to notice differences that negligible. The difference in ball speed between say the Rogue and the M3 is less than 1 mph. Spin nearly identical. which ever one you hit off the center of the face more often is the better one for you. This certainly isn’t like the 90’s where one driver to the next might create like 7-8 mph different in ball speed.

Thomas

5 years ago

pick the one off the rack u like the looks and feel
hit it and if the crack off the face and sound is OK
Buy it

Some Guy

5 years ago

This is a terrible approach with how much info and tech we have these days. Dumb, lazy, or both…

R Curry

5 years ago

My swing speed is about like a construction zone speed limit. Will be interesting to see results for those.

Jack

5 years ago

If you are testing clubs for their performance over 105 mpg then why are you using a golf ball specifically “engineered for swing speeds under 105”??? Appreciate what you are trying to do but this makes no sense to me.

MyGolfSpy

5 years ago

Consistency and reducing variables is important when performing tests such as this. Statistical significance is also an incredibly important output of information for consumers. In order to accomplish these goals we use one variable/ ball that provides consistent results and also reduces variables and gives you a constant. So if you were to change balls for different swing speeds in a categorical test such as this one you would both add variables and would be much more difficult to provide statistically significant data that provides the most accurate data and representation of how all equipment would perform for golfers.

Dan Z

5 years ago

I would love to see this test actually. From the interview with Dean Snell, I would guess that the difference is insignificant between the RX and the X. Extrapolate further, how about better players who have lost swing speed over the years. Are the better served with something like the Volvik S3 “designed for 90-105mph” than the Pro V1?

Vishal S

5 years ago

Hi, hope you are doing fine,
Every time we receive your messages, we also get some promos like win this driver and so on, but every time we write our id it says you are already registered. Who wins all these goodies. I have seen these messages for the last 2-3 years and I hope somebody is winning!!

hulk golfer

5 years ago

what if your swing speed is exactly 105mph? through out the round you get tired and swing maybe upper 90’s to lower 100’s mph. I think when im warmed up i can swing 105-110mph, but walking and about mid round im pretty sure most would be tired and start swinging in the lower 100’s and eventually upper 90’s. should i be looking for drivers in this group, or in the mid swing speed group?

GolfCodeWeekly *WIN FREE GOLF

5 years ago

So its clear the tester here swings at 105mph

Is 105mph really a fast swing?

Tour Average around 114mph and a lot of amateurs do swing that fast or faster, I would bet these clubs are actually designed to work their best closer to tour average speed or even above than at 105mph.

I swing fast and would like to see how these numbers compare at 120mph for example.

I know a brand that designs their clubs for really fast swingers, so they get the kudos of being the longest (Because the longest use them) but the relative performance does not exist for slower swingers.

Anyhow, please repeat the test at 120mph
thanks!

Aaron Merritt

5 years ago

Sam or one of the other guys could probably confirm this but they do have testers at 120mph…

Aaron Merritt

5 years ago

Also…if you are talking about Krank drivers or Geek Golf, I’m fairly certain they have been in tested in previous years

Brad

5 years ago

This objective data-driven testing is fantastic, but it’s greatest value is in helping to weed out clubs that don’t really stand up to their peers and perhaps highlight a handful of clubs that should be at the top of our lists for testing. Rushing out and buying a new driver just because it sits at the top of this list for average carry distance across a group of testers, or has 200rpm lower spin than the next driver – would probably be a bad idea.

What these tests really show is the importance of trying all of the clubs that you like the look of and give you confidence, and then seeing which one performs the best on a launch monitor as well as on course. If the store you are buying from is a good one, they will be able to provide a demo for on course testing.

Also, remember that numerous tests have shown that strike is king and shorter shaft lengths in drivers almost always results in better ball striking, with more consistent distances (often longer) with the driver. That’s why the PGA tour average driver length is around 44.5″. Crazy that most off the shelf drivers are 45.5″ or longer considering us amateurs are usually a million miles from striking the ball as well as the tour pros.

So, get properly fitted and go with a shorter driver shaft, and you will likely have the best results.

Bridie Boy

5 years ago

GolfSpy Comments on the Ping I20 Driver on April 19, 2012:

“GIVEN THAT OUR TWO SHORTEST HITTERS DID NOT PARTICIPATE IN THIS REVIEW, IT SHOULD COME AS NO SURPRISE THAT OVERALL AVERAGES ARE HIGHER THAN ANY PREVIOUS REVIEW. OUR 4 TESTERS AVERAGED 270.80 YARDS OF TOTAL DISTANCE (256.17 YARDS CARRY). NOTEWORTHY IS THAT ALL 4 TESTERS ACHIEVED DISTANCE TOTALS THAT ARE ABOVE THEIR HISTORICAL AVERAGES, WHILE TWO OF OUR TESTERS PUT UP SOME OF THE BIGGEST NUMBERS THEY’VE EVER ACHIEVED. SUFFICED TO SAY, LOOKING AT PURE DISTANCE NUMBERS, THE PING I20 IS AT OR NEAR THE VERY TOP OF OUR ALL-TIME LONGEST LIST.”

In six years, not much has changed.

Concerning spin you stated:

“THOUGH AS A GROUP OUR TESTERS AVERAGED 2460.07 RPM WORTH OF BACKSPIN, ONE OF OUR TESTERS AVERAGE JUST A LITTLE MORE THAN 2000 RPM, ANOTHER MANAGED AN ASTONISHING LOW 1678, WHICH SUGGESTS THAT A SOFTER SHAFT, OR AT LEAST ONE WITH A SOFTER TIP, MAY HAVE SOME BENEFIT FOR HIM.
STILL, EVEN WITH LOWER SPIN NUMBERS (GOOD NEWS IF YOU’RE LOOKING TO REDUCE SPIN), THE OVERALL RESULTS WERE DAMN NEAR AWESOME.”

I think I will keep playing the I20!

Bill

5 years ago

Watch Rick Shiels videos where he goes through the major mfgs last several driver models. Not much has changed. One of the best performing Ping drivers was the G20

Divot

5 years ago

I question the measurement of swing speed. 280 yards is not the yardage I would anticipate for someone with a swing speed of 110 or above.

Just question if those swing speeds are accurate

Terry McDowell

5 years ago

I think 280 is accurate for 105 – 110 swing speed. Mine is 117 and if I spin it too much it only goes 285.

Jake Bishop

5 years ago

I swing pretty much dead on 105 and these numbers are dead on.

Robert

5 years ago

I swing at around 114 and I’m almost every time looking at 290-300 so I’d say it’s pretty accurate.

GolfCodeWeekly *WIN FREE GOLF

5 years ago

Clearly when they say 105mph plus swings, they mean 105MPH

The best ball speed is 155mph

If they were swinging at 110, you would expect it to be 160 or a little above.

Some ballspeeds are as low as 151, for 105mph swing, still acceptable but if you are swinging at 110 and getting 151 ballspeed that is not good so a bad strike, which then make the tested numbers irrelevant as a mis hit is a mis hit

Mike Milburn

4 years ago

Yeah, my swing speed is right at this and this is even the same ball I use. Bridgestone BXS. So, my Ping G400 LST is carrying right around that 260-265 mark when hit well. I know this because when it was wet here lately in Oklahoma, I could see my divot in the fairway! The roll out is right around 275-280 when the ground is not saturated or bone dry. Just a normal fairway.

Alan

5 years ago

Do you guys seriously have to release this one blog post at a time, rather than release it at once?

Scott Finlay

5 years ago

Last year the Srixon Driver scored really well in the Most Wanted Driver. This year it is not even on the chart . What happened ?

Mike Barnard

5 years ago

Yes Srixon were highly rated in 2017, I presume it’s because there are no brand new products launched 2018.
I’ll bet the 765 and 745 would hold their own in the 2018 line up

Darren

5 years ago

What weight setting was the F8+ in ?

Cyrus Janssen

5 years ago

Great results for PING 400….all three models at the top for ball speed! Impressed!

Steve S

5 years ago

surprised that all the launch angles are “low”. it would be interesting to see “attack” angles. the ping driver fitting study showed that even higher swing speed golfers benefited from higher launch angles for carry distance. http://mygolfspy.com/mygolfspy-labs-the-driver-fitting-study/

Bryan Armstrong

5 years ago

What shaft was used with each driver? Was it the same for all of them? I assume it was, but would love to know specifics. Great test as always!

Thomas

5 years ago

Pick the one u like looks feel balance
Buy your price point. There all the same

Thomas

5 years ago

Besides all this statistical data, is nice only two are relevant as 90% are purchased off the rack
a. Total carry
b. Tester comments (missing)

don

5 years ago

The Tour Edge HL3 is definitely the best buy. It is 1/2 to 1/3rd the price and finished in the middle of the pack, well ahead of many far more expensive drivers.

Michael

5 years ago

I’d really like to see the results resorted based on ball striking accuracy. It would be interesting to see what the best club is for people who have trouble finding the center of the face and for those fortunate enough to find it all the time.

Brian

5 years ago

You can sort by clicking on column headers.

Michael

5 years ago

Sorry my comment wasn’t more clear. Ball striking deviation would be a tester metric not a club metric so no it’s not on the table.

GolfCodeWeekly *WIN FREE GOLF

5 years ago

It is fairly obvious from this test that the performance claims of manufacturers is less relevant to a golfers own performance than how the aesthetics of any given club suit the golfers eye / preference.

I personally do not like multicoloured clubs, plain, traditional and i like it, if i like it, i swing it better and this pretty much is going to negate any performance advantage claimed.

They should now all just say, pick the club that looks nicest to you, they are basically all the same.

One thing i did find interesting, the Vertical Groove Driver, they were giving me all kinds of outrageous claims with regards to distance and it is clear it is just A.N. OTHER driver

Have you guys ever done a test on the OPTIMAL length of shaft for say 10 handicappers and done a substantial review?

I am convinced that driver choice should be based on

1. DOES IT LOOK NICE TO ME
2. OK, lets make this club shorter
3. Lets split any 50/50 choice with data

but golfers start with the data number 1 and pick the longest.

Long post

Great review as always

Anon

5 years ago

Would it be possible to post SD along with the averages for each of the metrics?

Vaughn

5 years ago

Love the data! Can’t wait for the tests on the next level swing speeds. I’m wondering about shaft data and how we determine more than just the shaft flex for our swing.

Jailbird

5 years ago

Damn, that jailbreak technology on the PING’s is really a game changer for high ballspeeds.

Bryan Armstrong

5 years ago

Uh…the jailbreak technology is on the Callaway Rogue line. Typo?

Clay

5 years ago

I believe it was a joke based on Callaway claiming jailbreak creates the fastest ball speeds while Ping actually produced the fastest in this test.

Cody

5 years ago

Interesting that the G400 max had the highest ball speed but also the highest spin. right head shaft combo and you may have the winner right there.

Stephen DiBari

5 years ago

Excellent point. I have dished the Alta CB shaft for the Ping Tour 65 stiff flex and cut it down to 44.5 inches. Not sure if the Alta CB Shaft was used in the G400 Max for this test, more than likely it was since it’s the stock shaft.

I’ve yet to hit the G400 Max nor my latest purchase from Callaway CPO website: Rouge with a project X Even Flow 65 stiff also cut down to 44.5 inches.

Will be a great comparison that’s for sure. Both are high MOI drivers and looking forward to which one works better for me

Jamie

5 years ago

What is the MOI on the Rogue (where does it fall between 0-5,700 of the G400 Max)?

Clay

5 years ago

Interesting to see the differences and similarities, the top 9 for distance are within 3 yards of each other.

The reported ball speeds make me think Jail Break is as useless as Twist Face.

As a golfer with naturally low spin off the driver the LST and Sub Zero models don’t work well for me and I found the G400 Max to be perfect. It really shows the importance of getting fit.

Nigel

5 years ago

Bang-on Clay. I’m the same way. for me the G400 max and the F8+ (weight back) were perfect for me, while the Rogue SZ and G400 LST were falling out of the sky on mishits.

Stephen DiBari

5 years ago

I had the G400 LST and I was seeing the same. Not forgiving enough for me, recently sold it on eBay and bought the G400Max head.

chrisk

5 years ago

Now this is a real test. I’m sure you guys can do something for the middle of the pack (90 mph to 105 mph) and the slower swings speeds (less than 90 mph). The variation in this test really showed out for sure.

Ernest

5 years ago

If previous tests are any indication, further results will follow, grouped by swing speeds.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Drivers

2018 Most Wanted – The Best Driver For HIGH Swing Speeds (105+ mph)

INDEPENDENT & UNBIASED

245

HoursResearched

25

ProductsConsidered

10,071

ShotsHit

20.4m

Readers

GET FIT FOR YOUR GAME WITH TRUEGOLFFIT™

ADVANCED GOLF ANALYTICS

HOW WE CONSIDER PERFORMANCE

RESULTS:

TRUERank: Swing Speeds (105+)

For You

For You

Drivers

Sep 25, 2023

New: Mizuno ST-G Drivers

Fairway Woods

Sep 25, 2023

Mizuno ST-G Titanium Fairway Wood

Golf Wedges

Sep 23, 2023

Testers Wanted: Edison Wedges

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

comments

robert earl

Al

Bob Pegram

sam

JP

Ron

Preston

Jason

Corey

Berniez40

Anonymous

Greg

Anonymous

Clay

Brian Smith

Johnny Penso

mackdaddy

Mike

MyGolfSpy

Randy

Chad M

Thomas

Some Guy

R Curry

Jack

MyGolfSpy

Dan Z

Vishal S

hulk golfer

Aaron Merritt

Aaron Merritt

Brad

Bridie Boy

Bill

Divot

Terry McDowell

Jake Bishop

Robert

Mike Milburn

Alan

Scott Finlay

Mike Barnard

Darren

Steve S

Hours
Researched

Products
Considered

Shots
Hit