2020 Most Wanted Player’s Irons
Irons

2020 Most Wanted Player’s Irons

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

2020 Most Wanted Player’s Irons
Honma TR20 V
New Level 902 Forged
PING i210
Miura TC-201
New Level 902 Forged
Most Wanted Player's Iron
Honma TR20 V
  • 2020 Most Wanted Player’s Iron
  • The leader in Strokes Gained for mid and long iron
  • Among the leaders in total distance
  • Below average in terms of forgiveness
  • Had a negative Strokes Gained score for Short Iron
  • 1st
  • 14th
  • 167.6 Yards
Runner-up
New Level 902 Forged
  • A top performer in Strokes Gained for mid iron
  • Among the leaders in Strokes Gained for long iron
  • Among the leaders in forgiveness
  • Below-average performance in Strokes Gained for short iron
  • Lower numbers across the board for spin rate
  • 2nd
  • 5th
  • 166.4 Yards
PING i210
  • The leader in Strokes Gained for Short Iron
  • Higher Launch conditions in the Mid to Long Irons
  • Negative performance in Strokes Gained for Mid & Long Iron
  • Testers were not fond of the sound or feel
  • 3rd
  • 9th
  • 164.7 Yards
Miura TC-201
  • Among the leaders for Strokes Gained for Mid Iron
  • A tester favorite for looks and feel
  • Towards the bottom in Strokes Gained for Long Iron
  • Towards the bottom in Total Distance
  • 4th
  • 7th
  • 162.1 Yards
Best Value
New Level 902 Forged
  • A top performer in Strokes Gained for mid iron
  • Among the leaders in Strokes Gained for long iron
  • Among the leaders in forgiveness
  • Below-average performance in Strokes Gained for short iron
  • Lower numbers across the board for spin rate
  • 2nd
  • 5th
  • 166.4 Yards

INDEPENDENT & UNBIASED

MyGolfSpy accepts zero advertising dollars from any of the major golf manufacturers. We believe in always putting #ConsumerFirst.

240

Hours
Researched

16,320

Shots
Hit

17

Products
Considered

54.7m

Readers

OUR JOB IS YOUR GAME

Player’s irons. The “crème de la crème.” The aesthetically pleasing iron that gets your golfing juices flowing. We all know what they are, we all aspire to game them and many of us are seduced by their siren song.

Sadly, there is a caveat. Player’s irons are not for everyone.

If you don’t have strong ball-striking skills, you’ll likely benefit more from the forgiveness found in the 2020 Most Wanted Game Improvement Iron or the 2020 Most Wanted Player’s Distance Iron.

But if you are a lower-handicap golfer and a strong ball striker, the 2020 Most Wanted Player’s Iron test is for you.

Most Wanted – Honma TR20 V

Performance Grades

Below is a breakdown of performance grades by iron length. The percentages displayed for each iron represent how often it was among the best-performing irons for each golfer across the test pool. For more information about how we arrive at these results, see our How We Test page.

*Performance differences between clubs in the player’s CB (cavity-back) category are minimal compared to the other categories we’ve tested this season.

Buying Considerations

Performance should be your primary concern when buying new irons but there are additional considerations to think about before you make your purchase.

SET MAKE-UP

Set composition is critical when purchasing a new iron set. Traditionally, player’s irons (player’s CBs) come stock with a 3- or 4-iron depending on the manufacturer. Set make-up is evolving, however. Three-irons aren’t as prevalent as they used to be and, in some cases, they’re fading from the catalog entirely. While most still advertise eight-piece stock sets, the choice is yours. It’s not uncommon for golfers to purchase only five or six irons from a set and backfill the rest of the bag with a mix of hybrids, utility irons and specialty wedges. When deciding which irons and how many of them to buy, focus on purpose and performance. There’s no reason why all your clubs need to look the same.

SHAFT SELECTION

Whether it’s steel or graphite, the number of shaft options for irons is growing. As a result, it can be challenging to navigate the different models, weights and flexes to find the shaft that’s right for you. Ultimately, finding the best shaft for your game stretches well beyond graphite versus steel.

Throughout the 2020 Most Wanted Player’s Iron category, the stock shaft selection tends to be on the heavier end. For example, most of the stock shaft offerings range from 115 to 130 grams. Although this is the common theme, some manufacturers stock lighter shafts. Plus, there are a handful of manufacturers who offer graphite options.

We always recommend taking the time to go through a professional fitting but if you don’t have the resources, ask your local golf shop if they have a Mizuno Shaft Optimizer. It will recommend a list of shafts based on your swing. At a minimum, it will help you narrow the list. It even makes a lie angle recommendation.

DISTANCE VERSUS FORGIVENESS

When you think of player’s irons, distance and forgiveness are not words that catapult into your mind. More often than not, it’s not part of the story. In this year’s test, a bit of extra distance was found with TaylorMade P770 and PXG 0311 T Gen3. On the other hand, forgiveness (albeit on a narrow, comparative basis) makes an appearance via New Level 623-M Forged and Mizuno MP20 MMC. For those seeking a balance of both distance and forgiveness from a category known for neither, the New Level 902 Forged is a solid option.

COST

The 2020 Most Wanted Player’s Iron test contains irons in the upper echelon of the price range, often exceeding $1,000. Some are more than double that. However, there are hidden gems in terms of cost and performance. Both the New Level 623-M Forged and New Level 902 Forged cost $770 for a seven-piece set. At $875, the PING i210 makes for an intriguing option. Built into the cost is the aesthetics value (the attention to detail) necessarily absent from the game-improvement and super game-improvement categories. Lastly, given the average price point of the category, we suggest spending time with a professional fitter to ensure your money is well-spent.

Best Forgiveness - New Level 623-M Forged

Best Forgiveness - New Level 623-M Forged

Edging out the field in the forgiveness category, we have the New Level 623-M Forged. A direct to consumer product that has been inching its way to recognition. A traditional look, combined with a well received feel, this product is one to consider. For the price, you cannot beat it.

FIELD NOTES

During each test, we look for insight into where the market as a whole is moving. Furthermore, we analyze noteworthy changes manufacturers have made to improve year-over-year performance. Throughout testing, we solicit feedback from our testing pool. Although the testers’ subjective feedback is enlightening, it has zero impact on the overall rankings.

Trends and Tweaks

  • The harsh reality of player’s irons is that they are simply not for everyone. Inconsistent ball strikers need not apply. Do these irons feel incredible when struck well? Absolutely! But unless your skill level is appropriate, sacrificing performance for feel and workability is foolish. Check your ego before you buy.
  • When you think of player’s irons, you typically think of a forged iron. Single-piece forgings like the Mizuno JPX 921 Tour, Fourteen TC920, Miura TC-201, Honma TR20 V, and New Level 623-M Forged) dominate the test. That’s not to say multi-material, multi-piece offerings don’t exist. Ben Hogan PTx Pro, TaylorMade P770 and the Mizuno MP20 HMB feature construction that’s a bit more advanced than we typically expect from the category.
  • Let’s jack up the weight, shall we? Tungsten weighting, that is. Many player’s irons, such as Mizuno MP20 MMCWilson Staff FG Tour V6, and Titleist T100,  include some amount of tungsten weighting. The added weight, particularly in the long irons, helps promote higher launch.
  • Once again, our data suggest that the best-performing long irons are seldom from the same set as the best-performing mid irons. The same is true for short irons. It seems nobody excels through every slot in the bag, so it makes sense to focus on the area where you need to most help.
  • Since there is little separation in performance throughout this year’s test, getting professionally fitted is even more important. A professional fitting will differentiate between the irons that will be good for your game and the irons that will be superb for your game.

Use The Shaft to Improve Accuracy

While golfers typically think of the shaft as a means to optimize launch and spin, the reality is the shaft will often have a greater impact on accuracy and dispersion. Factors like weight, stiffness, and torque all play a role in how the club-head bends and twists as it's delivered to the ball. Consider these factors while getting fitted for a new set of irons.

Notes From the Testing Pool

The following section details subjective feedback from our pool of 20 testers. While it is meant to highlight some of the feedback obtained during the test, it’s important to note that none of it is directly related to the actual performance of the club and, as such, does not factor in the overall rankings.

  • Each tester was impressed with the array of golf clubs available. For most, it was their first experience hitting brands such as Miura TC-201, Fourteen TC920, New Level 623-M Forged, New Level 902 Forged and Scott Golf SG-02 Forged. For some, it was their first exposure to PXG 0311 T Gen3 or Honma TR20 V. Collectively, the feedback involving all of these products was extremely positive, especially in regards to feel or looks.
  • TaylorMade P770 and Mizuno JPX 921 Tour received consistent praise from a majority of testers. The two were highly touted fall releases and the testers were giddy over their design, feel and performance.
  • Once again, Srixon Z785 grabbed the testers’ attention. It was arguably a consensus top pick for most testers. Titleist T100 received similar praise with some testers saying it was the best-looking iron in the test.
  • Testers remarked on the classic shape/look of the Tour Edge Exotics EXS Pro Forged. For some, there was nostalgia when hitting the product.
  • A majority of testers spoke positively about the PXG 0311 T GEN3 in terms of feel and looks. Some raved about both features. However, there were multiple testers who commented on the perimeter weighting aspect. They believed it led to inconsistent performance. Thus, they strongly advised going through PXG’s fitting process in order to dial in the club.
Best Distance - TaylorMade P770

Best Distance - TaylorMade P770

In a category where distance isn't premium, the TaylorMade P770 stole the spotlight. Considerably longer than the 2nd place finisher, it was evident from the start of testing which product was going to take home the title. If you are looking for distance, wrapped in an aesthetically pleasing iron, this is the one.

2020 Most Wanted Player’s Irons Data

To filter and compare by club, use the drop-down list and checkboxes to select only the irons you wish to compare.

EXPERT TIP - SHAFT MATERIAL

Although steel shafts dominate the testing pool, graphite shafts are becoming more suitable for higher swing speed players. The perception is steel shafts are for stronger, faster swinging players. Whereas, graphite shafts are not. Be open minded towards the shaft material in your next set of irons. The appropriate shaft material can lead to tighter dispersion and tighter launch conditions, and graphite shafts might just be the ticket to those attributes.

PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS

2020 Most Wanted Players Iron Product Specs

Product
PW LoftPW Length7 Iron Loft7 Iron Length5 Iron Loft5 Iron Length
Ben Hogan PTX Pro

See the Best Price!
45.2535.87533.537.2525.2538.5
Fourteen TC920

See the Best Price!
45.53532.7536.8752637.625
Honma TR20 V

See the Best Price!
43.2535.37531.253724.2537.875
Miura TC-201

See the Best Price!
4535.62532.53725.2537.875
Mizuno JPX 921 Tour

See the Best Price!
45.2535.37533.537.12526.538
Mizuno MP20 HMB

See the Best Price!
4635.531.7537.12524.2538
Mizuno MP20 MMC

See the Best Price!
44.2535.531.53724.7538
New Level 623-M Forged

See the Best Price!
44.535.37533.536.7526.537.75
New Level 902 Forged

See the Best Price!
44.535.37532.536.7525.7537.75
Ping i210

See the Best Price!
44.2535.532.537.12525.7538
PXG 0311 T Gen3

See the Best Price!
4635.53236.7524.2537.875
Scott Golf SG-02 Forged

See the Best Price!
4635.533.537.12525.2537.875
Srixon Z785

See the Best Price!
4535.37531.7537.12524.2537.875
TaylorMade P770

See the Best Price!
45.2535.37532.2536.62524.7537.625
Titleist T100

See the Best Price!
45.535.5343726.7537.75
Tour Edge Exotics EXS Pro Forged

See the Best Price!
44353236.525.537.625
Wilson Staff FG Tour V6

See the Best Price!
4635.2533.2536.87525.2537.75

* denotes measured value versus manufacturer’s stated spec.

FAQ

BUYING NEW IRONS

Q: How often should I buy new irons?

A: While on rare occasions there are quantifiable year-over-year breakthroughs, typically it takes three to five years for manufacturers to make significant performance gains. With the USGA further tightening restrictions on manufacturers, it’s possible, even likely, that it will take longer still moving forward. Our recommendation is to buy new irons only when they appreciably outperform what is already in your bag. Of course, if you want new irons because you want new irons, be our guest.

Q: How do I determine the right category of irons for me?

A: The four basic categories of irons we test are: player’s (cavity backs), player’s distance, game improvement and super game improvement. While there is some overlap between categories, your search should begin with an honest assessment of your skill level (handicap) as well as what you need in your game. If your handicap is above 10 and ball-striking is not a legitimate strength, consider game improvement or super game improvement. For more skilled players who hit the ball more consistently, a set of player’s irons or player’s distance irons may benefit your game the most. For those on the bubble, especially for those seeking a few more yards, the player’s distance category could be ideal.

Q: Does the shaft matter?

A: Absolutely. While changes to spin and launch differences are rarely massive, shaft changes frequently lead to improved accuracy, tighter dispersion and greater overall consistency.

Q: What should I look for when testing irons?

A: Golfers have been conditioned to consider distance to the exclusion of nearly everything else but even within the player’s irons category, we recommended looking at the little numbers and looking for small circles. When comparing metrics like distance and ball speed, be sure to look at your standard deviations (the small numbers usually found under the big ones on the data screen). Smaller numbers mean better consistency, which will usually mean more than an extra yard or two on the golf course. Similarly, look for tighter dispersion ellipses (small circles). We can’t overstate the importance of consistency with irons.

Forged vs. Cast Irons

A common misconception is that forged irons are for better players. In reality, forgiveness is a function of geometry, not the manufacturing process. There are several forgiving forged irons on the market, i.e. Mizuno MP20 MMC, just as there are many cast irons - like the PING i210 - that are designed for lower handicap golfers.

 

MOST WANTED

Q: How are the irons in the test fitted to each golfer?

A: We use a fitting process that we call fit from stock. Irons are fitted to each tester using the stock, no up-charge options from each manufacturer. We test one short iron, one mid-iron and one long iron from each set. While there are no irons in our testing that feature adjustability, we fit to flex for each tester in the pool. Occasionally manufacturers will send multiple sets with different stock shafts that we can utilize to improve launch conditions.

Q: How do you determine in which category to test a given set of irons?

A: To ensure we’re testing irons as alike as designers allow for, in addition to the design of the head itself (profile, sole width, etc.), we sort by length and loft. Our goal is to keep differences as minimal as possible within any test cohort. When an iron reasonably fits in more than one category, we defer to the manufacturer’s category choice.

Q: How is the Most Wanted Player’s Iron 2020 determined?

A: To determine our rankings, we collect key performance metrics with Foresight GCQuad Launch Monitors. After eliminating outliers, we use a utilize a proprietary methodology to calculate Strokes Gained values for each combination of tester and golf club. The iron that produces the highest Strokes Gained values relative to the field average is our Most Wanted.

Q: How is the “longest” iron determined?

A: The process to determine the longest iron is similar to how we arrive at our overall rankings. For distance, our critical metric is Total Yards. We identify the iron that produced the most total yards with the long and middle irons relative to the field average.

Q: How is the “most forgiving” iron determined?

A: We’ve taken a practical approach to forgiveness. The club for which Strokes Gained values for the best shots are closest to the Strokes Gained value for the worst shots (relative to the field average) is the Most Forgiving.

Q: You discuss subjective feedback for things like looks, sound and feel. How much do those ratings factor into your rankings?

A: ZERO. Our rankings are based purely on launch monitor data and quantifiable performance metrics.

img

MyGolfSpy Testing Toolkit

World-class testing requires world-class equipment. This is the gear we trust to help us fulfill our Most Wanted testing.

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

Our mission is #ConsumerFirst. We are here to help educate and empower golfers. We want you to get the most out of your money, time and performance. That means providing you with equipment reviews you can trust, as well as honest reporting on the latest issues affecting the game today. #PowerToThePlayer

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

Driver Ping G30 Hybrids PXG 0317
3/4 IRON PXG 0311XF 5-GW Srixon Z 565
SW PXG 0317 LW PXG 0311
Putter EVNROLL  
MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Brandon

      4 years ago

      Thoughts on following. I’m 30 years old. Fit. Currently playing off 7. Using Taylormade Rocket Bladez Tour irons. In the market for new irons. Do not struggle with distance. More looking for consistency in distance control, with little bit of forgiveness. Something i can play now and continue to play well as my game improves further and into future.
      T100 vs Mizuno JPX / MP20 vs P770

      Suggestions or opinons?

      Reply

      H823putt

      4 years ago

      Hello Brandon,
      For sure the T100 as it is a perfect combination of great feel, looks, consistency and forgiveness.
      My son who is a 12 handi plays them and absolutely loves the performance.
      Titleist is a classic so will look good in the bag for many years.
      Have fun choosing!

      Reply

      Vishal

      4 years ago

      Are there any irons with really low bounce and flat sole (not rounded), something like Ben Hogan Apex II 1979 used to be? Or the old Mac Gregor’s.

      Reply

      Stephen

      5 years ago

      Curious how you measure forgiveness. For example, how can the New Level 623 be more forgiving than the 902? Thanks

      Reply

      Brad

      5 years ago

      The New Level 902 Forged are a fantastic set of irons at any price, but especially for the price. By far the best value in this bunch. The fit and finish is better than almost all of the irons on the market and if you want exacting custom specs, they deliver the goods. The short irons in this set didn’t score near the top in this test, but I’ve found both the short and mid irons to be very accurate and forgiving for me. .

      Reply

      Stephen Gengaro

      5 years ago

      It seems to me that all the irons in this test are high quality, and as mentioned in the article, being properly fit is critical. My guess is that most players, even low single digit handicap players, need to be fit properly, find a club they like the look and feel of, and learn the distances. If they do this, the minor differences in strokes gained highlighted in this article are probably rounding error for most mortals. I love the detailed work and enjoy reading it, but I think people need to keep it in context!

      Reply

      TonyG

      5 years ago

      Interesting that you picked Ping i210 over Blueprint for players option.

      Reply

      Robert

      5 years ago

      They don’t pick the irons, it’s usually the OEM that says which of it’s models should be in which category. I would hazard to guess, and this is only a guess that the Blueprint has such a miniscule demographic that they feel the reader is better served seeing the 210’s in the test.

      Reply

      ht

      5 years ago

      lot of touring pros use the 210’s

      Reply

      Thilo

      5 years ago

      Why no Cobra or Callaway? I would suggest a more homogeneous selection of club models, e.g. the mp-20 HMB from Mizuno is a clear Players Distance iron, Mizuno clearly stated that it is thought as an long iron option to be combined with the MP-20 or MMCs. Also the MMC is not a pure Players iron.
      Furthermore the selection of smaller manufacturers seems arbitrary, considering the vast number of these small brands, especially when you take the Japanese brands into account.

      But I do believe your testing is still the best I know of, so keep up the good work.

      Reply

      Alex

      4 years ago

      Because they dont like callaway, thats why they dont get picked for anything on this website

      Reply

      MyGolfSpy

      4 years ago

      Such great timing for the most ridiculous comment of the day. They just won our Most Wanted Driver Test:

      http://mygolfspy.com/2021-most-wanted-driver/

      #TruthDigest

      chrisk

      5 years ago

      Well, for me (a 4 handicap), smacking a 7 iron 180 yards isn’t my top priority. I like to see an iron give consistent distance results. (for example, do you have “hot” shots every so often). I’ve been gaming ping iBlades for the past 3 years, and they’re wonderful at distance control. I hardly ever have some weird shot that travels 10 yards further than expected, and the misses, if they’re not too bad, don’t lose as many yards as some other harder-to-hit clubs.

      Reply

      Martin

      5 years ago

      I always enjoy reading tests and will continue doing so. However my feeling is, that if you would repeat the test lets say 3 times, you would always get different ranking of clubs. Just as an example – Wilson FG tour V6 won the entire category in 2017. In 2020 it is almost at the end. I doubt that the technology would change that much in this category of irons. On top of that – to get a direct comparison. In both 2017 and 2020 there are 2 clubs that are the same. Wilson one and Ben Hogan Ptx. Both completely flipped in ranking. Same clubs. So again – fun and enjoying read, but I think we are not really ” testing” anything when the test outcomes are not repeatable.

      Reply

      Tony

      5 years ago

      Agree. Also, try several different irons before your buy (or get a professional fitting).. Find the ones that fit your eye. I play MP20 MMC…..Those work for me. Maybe a different will work better for you, but these fit my eye & feel like butter

      Reply

      Max

      5 years ago

      Yep, the i210 has been out for like 3 years now, why did this year it place 3rd and every other year not even place? Puzzling.

      Reply

      Erik

      5 years ago

      All the new clubs crushed it ;)

      JL

      5 years ago

      Martin, the Hogan clubs tested this year are the PTx Pro irons not the PTx irons… these are new clubs, I have a set of the PTx Pro’s and absolutely love them.

      Reply

      Jordan

      5 years ago

      I would like to see how the new cobra irons stack up to this years clubs. Cobra always seems to perform well, and it’d be nice to see some data on their new offerings.

      Reply

      Brandon

      5 years ago

      Crazy that the FG Tour V6 is still in the test. That club has to be 5 years old.

      Reply

      scott

      5 years ago

      Storks gained is a odd stat, how can you cage such a stat ? Won’t stroke gain be about forgiveness ? I have a set of callaway XR Steelhead and have almost missed the ball hitting the end of the toe and still be just short and right of the green .Now that’s a stroke gained. .

      Reply

      Brian

      5 years ago

      Can someone explain strokes gained to me. If I buy the Honma’s I could expect to gain 1 stroke over 50 rounds if another iron was at 0?

      Reply

      John R

      5 years ago

      What is considered a mid and long iron in your testing?

      Reply

      Matt

      5 years ago

      I have the New Level irons in a combo set and I’m just passing my second season with the irons. Because of the soft forged milled face expect more wear on the face your possibly use to. Two years of play will look like 4-5 years with other irons.

      Reply

      Max

      5 years ago

      I bet if you told the testers the i210 was forged they would have liked the feel better. There is something psychological where a person that considers themselves a ‘player’ needs to always say they prefer forged feel as well as smaller head, thinner top-line and less off-set. If they don’t say all of these things they think they will lose their ‘player’ title. i210’s feel great. Not sure why they didn’t score higher in the last two years of testing…..like, why did they come in 3rd this year but not even place in 2018 or 2019?

      Reply

      Andrew Richards

      5 years ago

      Anecdotally, I disagree. Got my irons circa 2011. Was 19yo, 7hcp, 99mph 6i, tested a variety of forged (Mizuno, Ping Blade), part-forged, (Titleist AP-2) and cast irons before settling on the Ping i20. There may be an allure to forged, but that usually dissipates once clubs are tested. Hands don’t lie IMO

      Reply

      LIGHT THE CANDLE

      5 years ago

      Sorry guys I can’t get past this so I’ll just say it. In my opinion a players iron should be come with traditional lofts and construction. Most of us playing these irons aren’t waving the magic want and asking for distance.It’s about consistency and control. I would almost bet that any fitter would not hand a 0-5 handicap a p770 after they just hit a 921 tour or T100. It would be a P7MC. Unless the player was looking for less spin and more…. distance. Why isn’t the P7MC on this list? A Stronger lifted hollow body speedfoam is most likely to get the most distance. No surprise there. With the modern lofts included in the test the is a fail for me. Am I way off guys???

      Reply

      Mike

      5 years ago

      Well many players on tour play stronger lofts throughout their set. The loft of the club shouldn’t matter at all. Whatever loft gets you the distance and accuracy you desire for a specific club is all that matters. Different angle’s of attack and swing speed may need stronger lofts to account for the increased spin put on the ball with their swing. Brysons lofts are very strong throughout his entire set because thats what works for him. Matt Wolff & Jason Day are another example of players with strong lofts. Players today are adjusting equipment to fit there unique swings instead of the other way around.

      Reply

      Mike

      5 years ago

      What are traditional lofts in the sense of how is that term valid today.? We’ve seen lofts all go craxy stronger in the pursuit of advertising more distance. I care little about the “number” of a club when testing one, it’s always the loft number..

      Reply

      Erik

      5 years ago

      But with how they have built up the MOI, the clubs have to be stronger lofted to keep the same height window. Otherwise, the 6 iron would be flying at 8 iron heights at “traditional” lofts.
      Agree with original post, no way P770 belongs in this category. Its either P7MB or MC.

      Nick

      5 years ago

      I’m a plus handicap and play in tournaments throughout the year and when I got fitted last year, I was looking at either Ping I210 or I500 and went with the I500. I had been doing some speed training and going in the I500 head was the only way I could lower my launch and spin. Due to the speed training, I had reverted back to being a high launch, high spin player. It took a few months to get comfortable with my new distances, but it is nice having 1-2 clubs less into the greens. Ideally, I think, in the future, I would go with CBS or blades in 8-W and a players distance iron in 4-7 iron.

      Reply

      Harm Florie

      5 years ago

      I would like to know the ball speed drop off on sleight mishits‘, so you could tell the off centre performance. I think we all miss the sweetpot, from time to time but what does this mean to loss in distance an offline yardage.

      Reply

      Luis Ramírez

      5 years ago

      I have never heard of Scott Golf before. An I the only one? Do you plan a story on this company? Visited their website from your link and they seem very open on what they offer and pricing. The products are visually pleasing and your results were not bad. Would be good to hear some background on them.

      Reply

      Daryl

      5 years ago

      Is the highest strokes gained iron essentially the most accurate by the most people? Do I take .125 and multiply by 18 to get a sense of how much it matters? That would be 2.25 strokes gained per round which is pretty massive it seems…

      Reply

      Stephen Gengaro

      5 years ago

      The strokes gained would be relative to the others. So a .25 versus a .15 would be a difference of 0..1 shots per shot.

      Reply

      Ian

      5 years ago

      “Once again, our data suggest that the best-performing long irons are seldom from the same set as the best-performing mid irons. The same is true for short irons.”

      It is blindingly obvious to me that if MGS really wants to provide a great service, they should start concocting mixed sets. that blend well, that provide optimum strokes gained across all irons.

      I want a 5-6-7 that help me deliver consistent distances over 150 yards. I want an 8-9-P-G that help me throw darts at flags with a ball that sticks. I want some sort of 3-4 equivalent (maybe 5) that are biased towards delivering distance on mishits.

      I truly believe that we need to think of our scoring irons (38* 42* 46* 50*) differently than all the others. Smart manufacturers will start offering them in 4-club sets, and avid golfers will be all over it.

      Reply

      Sandy

      5 years ago

      Why no Callaway iron tested? Do they not make a player’s iron?

      Reply

      Erik

      5 years ago

      I’m not sure why P770 and HMB were put into this catagory? I would think the P7MC or MB and Mizuno MP20 would be the better reps? I’m assuming ea manufacturer picked what they wanted used, but just doesn’t seem like all of these belong in the players category to me.

      Reply

      JohnQ

      5 years ago

      Agree, I thought the HMB was more of a player’s distance iron, sitting somewhere between the 919, now 921, Forged and Tour.. With the 921 Forged moving slightly more toward the GI space, it would seem this is even more so. Isn’t the HMB is essentially the MMC with help to get a higher ball flight and a little more forgiveness?

      Reply

      Erik

      5 years ago

      That’s kind of how I see them, although I thought forged was just a more forgiving version of Tour with Tour being for the less than 1% of players.

      Mark R

      5 years ago

      The lofts aren’t even all the same… I think that if the Ben Hogans if bent 2 degrees stronger through they would have the longest distance with right dispersion…

      KM

      5 years ago

      Are all of the players using the correct length/lie/grip that fits them best? If the irons are not the correct length and lie good luck getting REAL data especially on the long irons.

      Reply

      Chris

      5 years ago

      Surprised to see the Taylormade P7MC didn’t make the test! Was it not available at the time of the test?

      Reply

      Greg

      5 years ago

      Is P7MC not a more suited club for this category than P770? How come?

      Reply

      Erik

      5 years ago

      Three of us in a row all thinking the same thing at the same time :)

      Reply

      Richard

      5 years ago

      Some of these “Players” irons hit the ball further than the “Players Distance” irons, as I compare the numbers from your two different reviews.

      Did you use different testers or a different machine to measure distance?

      Reply

      Aart

      5 years ago

      Quite disappointing results for brand new clubs with a lot of media and You Tube attention. like the Mizuno MP-20MMC and JPX-921 Tour, Taylor Made P770, and Titleist T-100……. Best is mixed set/brands with long to mid-iron Honma TR-20V and short iron PING i210 :)

      Reply

      RSeg

      5 years ago

      Would like to see the gaping of each iron set. (all 7 clubs)

      I don’t care if my irons go far, the most important thing for players irons are the gapping

      Reply

      ryebread

      5 years ago

      I agree entirely on gaps and think that with every test. It’s arguably even a bigger deal with some of the GI offerings that have super strong 7 irons and then bunched lofts up top (where I contend the target audience can’t actually hit them consistently enough to gap them).

      I also recognize the testing challenge. First there’s just the clubs. I guess many OEMs are only sending three irons and not the whole set. If they are, then there’s the whole set * y number of sets * z number of testers scaling problem. Maybe let one low handicapper from each speed group have a go at a gap test?

      Reply

      Kyle

      5 years ago

      As someone who uses Ping i210s it’s good to see it still hanging up the top end of the test over 2 years after its release.

      Reply

      Hunter

      5 years ago

      I agree. I play the I210s with Steel Fiber shafts and they are awesome!! I can work the ball both ways no problem, and can stop and back them up as well. I actually love the sound and feel, so I’m not sure what the testers were complaining about.

      Reply

      Jeff Gelb

      5 years ago

      Great article and comparison. Going to have to take a look at the New Level and Honma sets.

      Since I a huge Mizuno fan is there a mistake in the PW loft for the MIZUNO MP20 MMC or is it really 54.25??

      Reply

      Tom Bomb

      5 years ago

      Titleist T100 included….but 921 Forged isnt? I find that…Odd.

      Sucks that 921 Forged and 921 Hot Metal Pro didnt make it into any of the “best of” this year.

      Reply

      Harm Florie

      5 years ago

      Those might be more in the game improvement category’ ? Great irons btw the 921 forged and HM

      Reply

      Bill

      5 years ago

      They aren’t GI.

      I’m going to assume that if MGS does a “player’s distance category” this year, those irons will fit and be tested there. However, Tony did say testing would be more limited due to the current situation.

      I will say this though… The player’s category has gotten just flat out weird. When we achieve some more normalcy in hopefully the near future, I would really appreciate three players irons categories:
      -player’s shotmaker (blade)
      -player’s cavity
      -player’s distance

      I think anything out there that would fit a “player’s” eye could be put into one of those three categories and we would get a great breakdown of data. When I hear player I typically think single digits, but really I think we are looking at some irons a 14-15 index could play depending on the various aspects of their game. For example, if we are assuming hot metal pro fits into players distance, which I’m not a fan of due to the lofts, a 15 handicapper can most likely play those irons. The lines have been blurred a bit with what it means to be a “player”.

      Dr Strangelove

      5 years ago

      Always enjoy these reviews. Nice job. A few questions that I haven’t seen the answers to (or missed):

      – What are the cutoffs / breakpoints for Short, Mid and Long irons? (e.g. is a 7 iron a mid-iron or short iron)? How about a 6 iron?

      – Does the shot gained apply per shot or per round? (i.e. will it take 40 shots to lose one shot for a -0.0025 rating or 40 rounds)?

      Reply

      Martin Chuck

      5 years ago

      Super pumped for Honma. I play them and love them. I’m glad others recognize how nice they are and how sweet they feel. The TR20V, w a combo 5 and 4 in the TR20P is a fantastic set for the low handicap player right up to 10-12 hdcp range.

      Reply

      Mark M

      5 years ago

      Thanks so much everyone for the work involved in putting this test together! This is the club test I most look forward to every year.

      I have two questions:
      – what is the makeup of what you consider short, medium and long irons?
      – The Wilson V6 hasn’t changed in years, why include it in this test?

      Reply

      Kansas King

      5 years ago

      I’m actually happy to see old irons on these tests. If anything, I would prefer to see the last two or three Most Wanted winners in each annual test to measure if there has been any improvements. However, with that said, I don’t think this testing is scientific or repeatable in any way. The putter tests show that as they have drastically different results each year with some of the same putters.

      Beyond including past winners, it would be nice if MGS added something to provide context for what 0.125 strokes gained might actually represent in real life. They are doing a good job with this in the Ball Lab tests by having the actual price for a dozen good balls. It would be nice if they could come up with a good illustration for he reality of strokes gained.

      Reply

      Bryce

      5 years ago

      .125 strokes gained means you gain on average one stroke every time you use the club eight times. On irons that might not represent much as you might use a 7i twice a round, but for driver and putter those would be huge as you’d get almost 2 a round with driver and about 4 with putter. Being 6 shots better per round just by getting the right clubs is a jump I think most people would make, costs permitting.

      Sydney

      5 years ago

      @ Bryce – we must also remember that .125 is the result or average for all the testers, not necessarily what everyone will gain if they played this club. At the end of the day everyone should try and make their own personal test to figure out what’s best for them on that particular day :)

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Balls
    May 20, 2025
    Callaway’s Father’s Day Grillmaster Supersoft Golf Balls: Well Done on the Outside, Same Ball On the Inside
    Golf Balls
    May 20, 2025
    AskMyGolfSpy: What Does A Golf Ball Drop Test Actually Tell You?
    Scottie Scheffler PGA Championship Scottie Scheffler PGA Championship
    News
    May 20, 2025
    We Can Stop Calling Scottie Scheffler Boring