Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.
Zero-torque putters are the latest sensation in our ever-changing equipment landscape. With our second year of evaluation in the books, the data is leaning favorably toward this category. Performance is consistently high across the field and, based strictly on our findings, it begs the obvious question: Would most golfers benefit from a zero-torque putter?
This is the most extensive, unbiased zero-torque putter review anywhere based on cold hard data. No BS. No marketing. Pure performance-based testing and results.
In 2026, our evaluation involved 26 different zero-torque models, a category that saw significant growth in just one year. While L.A.B. Golf continues to be a dominant force in this sector, several new brands made notable debuts, delivering performance results that are sure to impress.
This is a unique space in putter manufacturing. It can also be a confusing one. However, there are performance benefits to zero-torque putters. What better way to dive into it than through a data-driven outlet?
After 120 hours of testing and 16,640 total putts, we have our official Most Wanted Zero-Torque Putter results powered by PuttView.
These are the best zero-torque putters of 2026.
Ultimately, the best zero-torque putters are the ones with the best PuttView Handicap. Some crush the field at a specific distance, others offer a more balanced performance from short, medium and long range. Regardless of how they get to the podium, each offers exceptional performance benefits versus the field.
These are the best zero-torque putters overall.
PuttView HCP Overall
PuttView HCP Short
PuttView HCP Medium
PuttView HCP Long
Price
In our 2026 evaluation, the Odyssey Ai-Dual S2S #7 demonstrates exceptional consistency, a trait common among Zero-Torque putter designs. While it performs admirably across short and medium distances, it is particularly distinguished as the premier zero-torque option for long putts.
Performance wise, Odyssey Ai-Dual S2S #7 is outstanding across all three of our scoring categories. However, the visual appearance of the putter might be too distracting for some golfers. The white face is not subtle. If you don’t like the visual of a white putter face, then this putter isn’t for you.
Odyssey Ai-Dual S2S #7 is an old school design with a new twist. One of Odyssey’s most iconic putter concepts takes center stage and is the best zero-torque putter for 2026. Consistency in performance is the key to success and Odyssey Ai-Dual S2S #7 is the epitome of it. While it is the best zero-torque putter for long putts, it also ranks highly for short and medium putts. It is second best for the latter. If you’re struggling with your putting, you need to check out this putter.
“Love the grip. Acoustics are louder than most and “tinny”. Lacks pop off the face, but does roll the ball well.”
“Aims well with good sight lines.”
“Soft insert and feel, off-center/forward press grip is funky. Produces a smooth and easy roll.”
Performance, particularly regarding consistency, is indisputable, and this is where the Odyssey Ai-Dual S2S #7 truly excels. Our testing evaluation revealed its effectiveness across short, medium, and long-range putts; rather than specializing in a single scoring category, it demonstrated excellence in all three. While some testers expressed a dislike for the forward press grip, the empirical data remains compelling and may even be a primary factor in these results. We encourage you to experience the Odyssey Ai-Dual S2S #7 firsthand.
PuttView HCP Overall
PuttView HCP Short
PuttView HCP Medium
PuttView HCP Long
Price
Consistency defined the top performers in this year's zero-torque putter evaluation. The Sub 70 011-SQ is a model of such reliability, securing a top-five finish in every scoring category. Beyond its steady performance, this putter stands out as a high-value selection. While other models might hold the title of "best value," the 011-SQ remains a premier choice for golfers seeking a zero-torque putter that balances performance with affordability.
If Sub 70 is a brand you aren’t yet familiar with, this is the perfect introduction. Their equipment has consistently performed well, even earning victories in our past tests. The 011-SQ continues this trend, serving as their latest model to deliver exceptional results. While we recognize that some golfers might be hesitant to explore a newer or different brand, this putter is absolutely worth your consideration—especially considering it can be a total bargain at its current price point.
During our 2026 evaluation of the premier zero-torque putters, the Sub 70 011-SQ emerged as a notable standout. While several direct-to-consumer labels are currently making significant movement within the zero-torque market, Sub 70 distinguishes itself by placing in the top five across every scoring metric. This across-the-board performance translates into exceptional on-course consistency. For golfers interested in exploring a different approach to their putting game, the Sub 70 011-SQ is highly recommended for consideration.
“Set up perfectly, Like the single long line for alignment.”
“Distance control is phenomenal. It felt like it was impossible to 3-putt.”
“You could feel the ball all the way up to your hands when you hit it…responsive. Very impressive.”
The Sub 70 011-SQ delivered a compelling performance during our second annual zero-torque putter evaluation. Across short, medium, and long-range putts, it demonstrated impressive PuttView Handicap results. Beyond its functional performance and excellent value, our testers awarded it high marks for its aesthetic appeal and feel, further broadening its attractiveness to golfers.
PuttView HCP Overall
PuttView HCP Short
PuttView HCP Medium
PuttView HCP Long
Price
Through our extensive testing history, we have identified that mid-range putting performance is a critical metric and a reliable predictor of a putter's overall capability. Success in this area often determines the overall effectiveness of the club. The Vice Golf VGP03 ZT particularly shines in this regard, achieving its highest categorical ranking in our medium-putt analysis by delivering the fourth-best PuttView Handicap.
The VGP03 ZT stands out as one of the premier zero-torque putters in our evaluation, despite mixed reactions to its aesthetics. While Vice is recognized for its bold and creative product designs, the specific black and bright green color scheme of this model did not resonate with all our testers. Nevertheless, the putter's high-level performance should ultimately outweigh any subjective concerns regarding its visual appeal.
As another prominent direct-to-consumer brand, Vice Golf offers a putter that delivers exceptional performance. In our 2026 zero-torque putter evaluation, the VGP03 ZT secured third place overall. While it did not lead any individual scoring category, the club demonstrated remarkable consistency throughout our testing. Ultimately, its steady PuttView Handicap results across all metrics earned it a third-place finish and a spot among our “best value” selections. We recommend giving it a try.
“Decent putter. Not a fan of the color scheme.”
“Best of all the putters at this point. I would buy right now – phenomenal alignment and weighting.”
“Very muted sounds, which I like. I wanted to dislike, but performance is solid.”
Prioritize performance over subjective aesthetics. The Vice Golf VGP03 ZT exemplifies this philosophy; while it may not be the most visually striking putter available, its on-course results are undeniable. Given its high-level performance and its recognition as a “best value” option, it is a club well worth testing.
The mallet putters that make the most short putts are going to be top performers. At a short distance, you don’t want the putter that limits your ability to make putts. Missing short putts has a greater impact on PuttView Handicap relative to other distances.
These are the best zero-torque putters for short putts.
PuttView HCP Short
PuttView HCP Medium
PuttView HCP Long
PuttView HCP Overall
Price
The Wilson Zero Torque Lakeview excels on short putts, recording the best PuttView Handicap in this category across our entire 2026 putter testing cycle—outperforming every blade and mallet evaluated. This remarkable performance highlights the advantages of the Lakeview specifically and the zero-torque design more broadly. For golfers who find short-range putting challenging, the Lakeview is a highly recommended solution.
Although the Wilson Zero Torque Lakeview demonstrates elite proficiency from short range, its PuttView Handicap for long-distance putts falls within the lower half of the field. While the broader zero-torque category generally performs respectably on long putts, the Lakeview’s specific data in this area represents a notable performance drawback.
In our zero-torque putter review, the Wilson Zero Torque Lakeview earned a fourth-place overall ranking. Its success is driven by an elite showing in our short putt scoring, where it achieved the top PuttView Handicap for the short putt category among all 2026 putter evaluations. Due to this high-level efficiency, the Lakeview has been recognized with one of our “best value” awards.
“Exellent performance. Love the simplicity of it.”
“Love the alignment aid and the constrast of white on black.”
“Alignment makes it easy and the forward press sets up square.”
Securing the top PuttView Handicap for short putts is a significant accomplishment. Under our updated testing framework, short-putt accuracy is a vital component of a club’s total score. The Wilson Zero Torque Lakeview delivers an impressive performance to earn this distinction. Available at a competitive $199.99, this zero-torque model from Wilson is certainly worth your attention.
PuttView HCP Short
PuttView HCP Medium
PuttView HCP Long
PuttView HCP Overall
Price
The Evnroll Z1cs distinguishes itself as a premier choice for those seeking to improve their performance on short putts. It is another zero-torque putter that produces an outstanding PuttView Handicap on short putts. For golfers who find short putts challenging, the Evnroll Z1cs represents an exceptional equipment solution.
Evnroll Z1cs lacks the performance on mid-range and long putts required to be among the best zero-torque putters of 2026. Its PuttView Handicap ranks in the bottom half for each scoring category. If mid-to-long putts are ones you struggle with, you may want to consider an alternative zero-torque putter option.
Exceptional results merit mention, and the Evnroll Z1cs delivers by ranking as the second-best zero-torque putter for short distances under our PuttView Handicap system. However, the putter struggles to maintain that momentum, falling short with disappointing results on both mid-range and long-distance attempts. This putter is a compelling option for those who primarily need help closing out short putts, even if its total performance is inconsistent.
“Easy to align and rolled really true. Direction/distance were great.”
“Love the looks, feel, and it is a contender for a potential gamer. Alignment aid is fantastic. A+.”
“Best Evnroll I’ve putted with. I left a few short dead in the heart. Love the feel, balance and roll.”
Few things are as frustrating for a golfer as struggling with short putts. However, the Evnroll Z1cs serves as a premier solution to this haunting issue, securing the second-place spot in the PuttView Handicap for short-range performance. In a category defined by fierce competition and high-caliber results across the board, the Z1cs distinguishes itself as an elite option for those looking to improve their game from close in.
We can’t stress this enough: making putts at medium range is game-changing. In the past, we had 10-foot putts. At this distance, we saw the great separation in performance between the best and worst putters. This remains true despite the integration of PuttView and changing some internal parameters. If a putter excels at mid-range, it will likely make its way to the leaderboard.
These are the best zero-torque putters for medium putts.
PuttView HCP Long
PuttView HCP Short
PuttView HCP Medium
PuttView HCP Overall
Price
The Lazrus Golf LAZ2 stands out as a premier underdog. It secured the highest rank in our medium-distance putting evaluation, recording the top PuttView Handicap. Impressively, this result represents the strongest PuttView Handicap score recorded across our entire testing field, outperforming every blade and mallet model evaluated in other testing categories.
In terms of PuttView Handicap for short and long-distance putts, the Lazrus Golf LAZ2 underperforms compared to the rest of the testing field. This reflects a broader trend in zero-torque scoring: while individual results vary between models, zero-torque putters as a category demonstrate greater consistency than the blade and mallet models evaluated in our other tests.
The Lazrus Golf LAZ2 emerged as a standout in the zero-torque putter space, earning the top spot for medium-distance putts. While this specific success often drives high overall rankings, the LAZ2’s momentum was hindered by lower PuttView Handicap scores on short and long putts. Despite these disparities, it remains an excellent value choice within a highly competitive field.
“Great weight, easy to align, and sets up well.”
“For the price, it is worth a try. Better than some others in the zero-torque category.”
“The off-set and the looks were a perfect match. I loved the weighting. Felt like the putter was made for me.”
The zero-torque putter category is highly competitive in 2026. There were a plethora of newcomers, including Lazrus Golf LAZ2. For the price, it is an incredible value option, especially as an award winner in the medium putt category.
PuttView HCP Medium
PuttView HCP Short
PuttView HCP Long
PuttView HCP Overall
Price
In our 2026 evaluation, the Odyssey Ai-Dual S2S #7 demonstrates exceptional consistency, a trait common among Zero-Torque putter designs. While it performs admirably across short and medium distances, it is particularly distinguished as the premier zero-torque option for long putts.
Performance wise, Odyssey Ai-Dual S2S #7 is outstanding across all three of our scoring categories. However, the visual appearance of the putter might be too distracting for some golfers. The white face is not subtle. If you don’t like the visual of a white putter face, then this putter isn’t for you.
Odyssey Ai-Dual S2S #7 is an old school design with a new twist. One of Odyssey’s most iconic putter concepts takes center stage and is the best zero-torque putter for 2026. Consistency in performance is the key to success and Odyssey Ai-Dual S2S #7 is the epitome of it. While it is the best zero-torque putter for long putts, it also ranks highly for short and medium putts. It is second best for the latter. If you’re struggling with your putting, you need to check out this putter.
“Love the grip. Acoustics are louder than most and “tinny”. Lacks pop off the face, but does roll the ball well.”
“Aims well with good sight lines.”
“Soft insert and feel, off-center/forward press grip is funky. Produces a smooth and easy roll.”
Performance, particularly regarding consistency, is indisputable, and this is where the Odyssey Ai-Dual S2S #7 truly excels. Our testing evaluation revealed its effectiveness across short, medium, and long-range putts; rather than specializing in a single scoring category, it demonstrated excellence in all three. While some testers expressed a dislike for the forward press grip, the empirical data remains compelling and may even be a primary factor in these results. We encourage you to experience the Odyssey Ai-Dual S2S #7 firsthand.
Being consistent with longer putts is a key ingredient for performance. Making putts helps but maintaining speed control and closer proximity to the hole are critical factors. The putters that achieve these three performance traits rise to the top.
These are the best zero-torque putters for long putts.
PuttView HCP Long
PuttView HCP Short
PuttView HCP Medium
PuttView HCP Overall
Price
In our 2026 evaluation, the Odyssey Ai-Dual S2S #7 demonstrates exceptional consistency, a trait common among Zero-Torque putter designs. While it performs admirably across short and medium distances, it is particularly distinguished as the premier zero-torque option for long putts.
Performance wise, Odyssey Ai-Dual S2S #7 is outstanding across all three of our scoring categories. However, the visual appearance of the putter might be too distracting for some golfers. The white face is not subtle. If you don’t like the visual of a white putter face, then this putter isn’t for you.
Odyssey Ai-Dual S2S #7 is an old school design with a new twist. One of Odyssey’s most iconic putter concepts takes center stage and is the best zero-torque putter for 2026. Consistency in performance is the key to success and Odyssey Ai-Dual S2S #7 is the epitome of it. While it is the best zero-torque putter for long putts, it also ranks highly for short and medium putts. It is second best for the latter. If you’re struggling with your putting, you need to check out this putter.
“Love the grip. Acoustics are louder than most and “tinny”. Lacks pop off the face, but does roll the ball well.”
“Aims well with good sight lines.”
“Soft insert and feel, off-center/forward press grip is funky. Produces a smooth and easy roll.”
Performance, particularly regarding consistency, is indisputable, and this is where the Odyssey Ai-Dual S2S #7 truly excels. Our testing evaluation revealed its effectiveness across short, medium, and long-range putts; rather than specializing in a single scoring category, it demonstrated excellence in all three. While some testers expressed a dislike for the forward press grip, the empirical data remains compelling and may even be a primary factor in these results. We encourage you to experience the Odyssey Ai-Dual S2S #7 firsthand.
PuttView HCP Long
PuttView HCP Short
PuttView HCP Medium
PuttView HCP Overall
Price
Vice Golf has another stellar performer: VGP04 ZT. This zero-torque putter is Vice Golf’s mallet style offering. It is the runner up for PuttView Handicap on long putts. Making or having a close proximity to the hole on longer putts is a recipe for success on the golf course.
The Vice Golf VGP04 ZT excels at long-range putting, but its performance drops significantly on short and medium-length attempts. Because its PuttView Handicap scores for these two metrics fall below the field average, the putter's overall testing rank is pushed toward the bottom of the category. While it remains a premium choice for distance consistency, it lacks the necessary control and consistency to compete as a well-rounded performer.
At the heart of our testing process is product performance. It is why we test at such extensive measures. While some items achieve high marks across every scoring metric, others demonstrate specialized excellence. The Vice Golf VGP04 ZT falls into the latter group, delivering standout PuttView Handicap results specifically on long putts. Its overall standing was impacted by lower scores on short and medium-length putts, yet it remains an excellent choice for golfers seeking better lag putting and reliable performance from a distance.
“First time using a Vice putter and loved it. Given time, I feel confident I’d perform well with it.”
“Effortless roll. Heavy. Made 62% of the putts.”
“Very accurate and easy to hit.”
At the heart of our testing process is product performance. It is why we test at such extensive measures. While some items achieve high marks across every scoring metric, others demonstrate specialized excellence. The Vice Golf VGP04 ZT falls into the latter group, delivering standout PuttView Handicap results specifically on long putts. Its overall standing was impacted by lower scores on short and medium-length putts, yet it remains an excellent choice for golfers seeking better lag putting and reliable performance from a distance.
All of our testing is predicated on data. Without objective data, any testing is irrelevant. With PuttView, our putter testing as a whole is enhanced exponentially. It is inarguably the best in the industry.
In addition to the data implications, PuttView makes our putter tests significantly more dynamic. On the golf course, every putt is different: distance, slope, break, speed. While we’ve always tested putters from multiple distances, we weren’t able to integrate other aspects of putting that golfers experience on the golf course.
With our custom-developed randomized testing protocol, we’re able to replicate on-course putting more accurately. Every putter is tested under identical conditions. Every tester hits the same number of putts from uphill, downhill, left- and right-breaking and straight—but the exact locations are randomized. The hope is to prevent golfers from getting grooved in from one location, making the results more reflective of actual putting performance.
But the biggest leap forward is data and there is plenty of it.
As we become more familiar with the gold mine that is PuttView, our goal is to mine data, evaluate and repurpose our findings into subsequent putter content.
In past putter tests, we’ve relied purely on Strokes Gained and total putts holed to determine our Most Wanted winners. Although these metrics provide a clear picture of which putters perform well throughout the testing process, they don’t give additional insights and they make results confusing.
We partnered with PuttView to create a more understandable result. Something that most golfers can relate to: a handicap.
PuttView Handicap is defined as:
“A measure of a player’s putting ability representing the number of strokes above or below par. The PuttView Handicap is calculated based on the Stokes Gained, i.e., compares the current performances with an average tour player for the given putt distances.”
The PuttView Handicap scores dictate the overall results. They are broken down into three ranges:
The overall winner has the best PuttView Handicap average.
Keep in mind that the results are based on an average PGA Tour player’s performance for the given distances.
Our Most Wanted Zero-Torque Putter testing took 120 hours and included 26 models. Twenty avid golfers took part.
Each tester hit 32 putts with each putter throughout the entirety of the test. The test scenario is completely randomized in order to create a more realistic putting experience. There are four distances during the test scenario:
Straight and flat putts are prioritized. Yet, with PuttView, we are able to implement uphill, downhill, left-to-right and right-to-left breaking putts. This further enhances the testing scenario and creates more realistic putting conditions. However, we approach it with balance as our goal is to test putter performance, not a golfer’s ability to read a green. Too many variations in the environment can water down the actual evaluation of putter performance.
| OEM | Model | PV Handicap Overall | PV Handicap Short | PV Handicap Medium | PV Handicap Long |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odyssey | Ai-Dual S2S #7 | -8.1 | -7.9 | -6.2 | -10.4 |
| Sub 70 | 011-SQ | -7.7 | -8.1 | -4.9 | -9.7 |
| Vice Golf | VGP03 ZT | -7.6 | -7.9 | -5.9 | -8.6 |
| Wilson | ZT Lakeview | -7.5 | -9 | -4.3 | -7.4 |
| PXG | Bat Attack ZT | -7.3 | -7.2 | -6 | -8.8 |
| Odyssey | S2S Tri-Hot Jailbird | -7.2 | -7.8 | -3.8 | -9.5 |
| Bettinardi | SB5 | -6.9 | -7.9 | -2.2 | -9.8 |
| Evnroll | Z5cs | -6.7 | -7.3 | -3.5 | -8.6 |
| Moment | Zero | -6.6 | -7.3 | -3.8 | -7.8 |
| Scotty Cameron | Phantom 11 OC | -6.6 | -8.5 | -3.1 | -6.3 |
| Evnroll | Z1cs | -6.5 | -8.8 | -2.1 | -6.4 |
| L.A.B. Golf | DF3i | -6.4 | -6.9 | -2.7 | -8.9 |
| SeeMore | SBx | -6.4 | -6.9 | -3.7 | -8.2 |
| Void | Saber Centerfire | -6.3 | -8 | -1.4 | -7.7 |
| Lazrus | ZT | -6.3 | -5 | -7.4 | -7.7 |
| Wilson | ZT 606 | -6.2 | -7 | -3.5 | -7.1 |
| Edel | E-T01 | -6.1 | -6.6 | -2.6 | -8.7 |
| Toulon | Formula 90 | -6.1 | -6.8 | -3.5 | -7.6 |
| L.A.B. Golf | OZ1i HS | -6 | -7.1 | -0.6 | -9.1 |
| Vice Golf | VGP04 ZT | -5.8 | -5.2 | -2.5 | -10.3 |
| Bettinardi | SB3 | -5.8 | -6 | -3.2 | -8.2 |
| PXG | Hellcat ZT | -5.6 | -4.4 | -4 | -9.6 |
| Tommy Armour | No.4 ZT | -4.9 | -4.4 | -2.6 | -8.3 |
| Void | Goliath Centerfire | -4.8 | -4.3 | -0.6 | -10.2 |
| SeeMore | SKx | -4.8 | -6 | -0.6 | -6.7 |
| Scotty Cameron | Fastback OC | -3.4 | -2.5 | -1 | -7.8 |
Performance is key. It always has been and always will be. A negative PuttView Handicap is a positive in our evaluation. Think of it as a “plus” handicap in golf. In this test, even the zero-torque putters towards the bottom had a “positive” PuttView Handicap. This is a trend we are seeing just two years into testing zero-torque putters. Every winner in our three scoring categories produced a higher PuttView Handicap than those category winners in our best blades and best mallet reviews.
Zero-torque putters are unconventional. From their core designs to the manner in which a manufacturer achieves their properties to their overall looks, they’re downright weird, especially to golfers who have no experience with them.
There are some that offer a more conventional look and feel. However, most of them are quite unique. Don’t judge a book by its cover.
During our testing, we ask our testers to rate each product for sound, feel, looks, and likelihood of purchase based on a 10-point scale. L.A.B. Golf DF3i is rated the highest for sound, feel, and likelihood of purchase. While, Scotty Cameron Phantom 11R OC is rated the highest for looks.
The subjective performance does not count towards overall scores. However, it does provide insight as to what consumers may or may not think of a product.
Comparatively to blade and mallet putter results, zero-torque putters performed exponentially better in our PuttView Handicap analysis. It truly begs the question: Would a majority of golfers benefit from a zero-torque putter?
With each passing year, we’ll gain more insight into this valid question. Based strictly on our second test, the trend seems to be a resounding “yes.”
Best versus worst: Short putts
For short putts, there is a 6.5 PuttView Handicap differential from best to worst. Wilson Zero Torque Lakeview and Scotty Cameron Fastback OC are the best and the worst, respectively, on short putts.
Best versus worst: Medium putts
For medium putts, there is a 6.8 PuttView Handicap differential from best to worst. This is the largest differential among the three distance categories. Lazrus Golf LAZ2 and Void Goliath Centerfire, respectively, are the best and worst zero-torque putters on medium putts.
Best versus worst: Long putts
Several zero-torque putters excel at long putts. We see the highest PuttView Handicap averages at this distance. Odyssey Ai-Dual S2S #7 and Scotty Cameron Phantom 11R OC are the best and worst zero-torque putters on long putts.
Putting performance will obviously be influenced by making putts. However, you can still be effective and efficient without making a high percentage of putts. Proximity to the hole plays a huge role in overall performance, especially in the calculation of PuttView Handicap. You can make half of your putts but where you miss and how you miss can greatly affect performance.
During the 32-putt test scenario, testers hit a single putt from each starting location. PuttView registers where the ball comes to rest and applies a calculation. If you miss a four-foot putt severely and more than once, it’ll cripple a PuttView Handicap in a heartbeat whereas slightly missing an 18-foot putt might have less of an impact.
Stability, forgiveness, consistency, distance control and the correct shaft and grip are all important pieces of this puzzle. Go for a fitting to discover your needs for lie angle and length. Each of these can assist in getting the golf ball on the right starting line and provide a more consistent strike location on the putt face. It doesn’t always take a premium-priced putter to get the golf ball in the hole. Sometimes it’s as simple as finding the match for your game.
World-class testing requires world-class equipment. This is the gear we trust to help us fulfill our Most Wanted testing.
Cancer Survivor. Amputee Golfer. Essentially, a OneLeggedBoss. When he isn't facilitating testing or analyzing data, Phillip enjoys his family time, practicing and playing golf, unwinding with video games, capturing photos of nature, or devouring pretzels.
| Driver Titleist GT3 | 3 Wood Titleist GT3 |
| 7 Wood Callaway Elyte Triple Diamond | Irons (5-PW) Srixon ZXi5 |
| Wedges (46, 50, 54, 58) Titleist Vokey SM10 | Putter L.A.B. MEZZ.1 MAX |
| Ball Titleist Pro V1x |
2 weeks ago
Interesting no Taylormade ZT. If you look around the golfing world many have ranked this putter over most Zero Torques. What went into the thinking of not adding it so we get the real results?
2 weeks ago
Saw that too. That is a missing “Key Insight” to the write-up.
3 days ago
I might be wrong, but it looks like they only tested putters with model years or major changes listed as 2026? I was also looking for other ZT putters on the list, including my LAB OZ1i and the TaylorMade putters
3 weeks ago
Just a minor update. The Lazrus putter tested is the LAZ2 Zero Torque Mallet Putter and it cost $197 not $217. The LAZ2.5 Zero Torque Mallet Putter which was not tested cost $217.
3 weeks ago
The results are representative but not definitive. Putting is personal and dependent on a persons personal putting dynamics. This evaluation was based on twenty “avid” golfers at four distances at a facility indoors. Each golfer got 32 putts per putter model which equates to 8 putts per the selected four distances for each putter. And what happens when it moves outdoors where the elements can also affect the outcomes? Said another way, this evaluation is a good starting point, but the sample size of 20 golfers is small enough to leave plenty of wiggle room for subjective interpretation. My point is that getting fit for which putter is best for you and then testing it on greens outdoors seems like a reasonable and prudent next step before plopping down your hard earned cash.
3 weeks ago
How could you not even consider the Taylormade ZT or ZT CB? I switched from the Bettinardi Antidote to the Taylormade ZT CB this year and love it. Great putter!
3 weeks ago
Did you even consider the Honu putter?
3 weeks ago
Were people fitted for these or just one putter (per model) used by everyone? This would have a huge impact on the outcome. Frankly, any putter with a big differential between short, medium, & long more likely says something about the person putting, are they comfortable with a true zero torque putter and the fit v. the quality of the putter. Frankly, looking at this test as a whole, it seems suspect as the numbers for the medium putt seems to be very lower across most of the putters. Did anyone look at that? An example:
L.A.B. Golf DF3i -6.4 -6.9 -2.7 -8.9. Those results, on the surface, seem to be very odd. It is like that for most of the models.
3 weeks ago
You guys that complain about your model missing need to realize there are 3 pages of clubs listed. All I know is scotty has alot of work to catch up to the field since it was last by a mile. Then again the scotty’s generally don’t test as well as thr price tag and especially the hype would have you believe. Seems like Scott’s stuck in the past since it seems like he makes the same putter year after year.
3 weeks ago
I agree with the sentiment that not all putters could be tested (though not sure how many zero torque are out there, can’t be that many – yet), but to miss the big hitters (no pun intended!) does put the verdict in doubt!
3 weeks ago
I would contend you re speaking of reduced toque putters and not zero torque. If they are zero Torque – did you do any measuring of torque? Did you put them in a revealer to see what they do?
What is the background of the putters (people doing the putting)? From my experience you have to spend a long while with a ZT putter to truly remove yourself from the world of torque
Knowing the background of the testers would help determine if they were used to a ZT putter or not and how that might influence the test results.
If I show up to a horse race with Bessie my cow, does that mean Bessie is a race horse? What if part of the race was giving milk – Bessie could be named the winning horse.
3 weeks ago
Dude this is not texting for medical devices. Good grief.
3 weeks ago
How is this a real test when Taylormade ZT not in it or all the Odyssey zero torque offerings. Would really like to see all of them head to head. I purchased the winner and I found it hard to control distances for me. Head to light I believe.
3 weeks ago
The Sub70 website says the 001-SQ is not a zero torque putter (in the questions section of the page for that putter).
3 weeks ago
Great work again! I’ve never used one of these zero torque putters but one keeps showing up in my Facebook feed, the Perfomamce Golf RS1. Concept seems viable but it may have been released too late to be in this test. Any word if it’s legit or not? Usually can’t trust Facebook for anything.
3 weeks ago
Bought the Lazarus as a preorder performed well, just didn’t feel as solid as I would like. Tried to give it to a buddy who fell in love with it, he insisted on paying something – got $100 from him and but the the Sub70, only played three rounds performed well. My third Sub70 putter, the others have a adjustable weights – not available on the ZT model. With the Sub70 release of the Bullseye blade, may be adding a 4th Sub70 to collection. After donating some putters to junior golf down to only 20 or so. So yes I am nuts.
3 weeks ago
I value MGS perspective and understand the PuttView testing concept. When I see tour pros switch away from LAB and PuttView develops the Iron Byron equivalent for putters, I’ll consider a clone.
3 weeks ago
Can someone explain how the LAB putters ran away with the test last year, and can’t even make the first page this year?
3 weeks ago
I’d say it’s because of the way they tested this year. Randomising the different lengths of putts just means that the most vanilla putter, the one that feels the most similar to whatever you normally use, or is not substantially different from the rest, is going to win. The testers have no time to get used to a putter, and the randomized shots just make that worse. Anything that takes time getting used to is going to fare really badly in this type of test, and that is always the case with LAB putters. And the winner in this test, the most ‘normal’ putter’ bares this out.
3 weeks ago
Good insight.
3 weeks ago
Love these tests. Would also have liked to see results with ping and taylormade included.
3 weeks ago
The S2S 7 is a putter I like the looks of, but feels too light in the head and I can’t swing it back and forth properly. I have a Spider ZT Cruiser model, but it hasn’t beaten my Bettinardi Antidote SB2 hunk of metal on a stick out of my bag yet. I needed to add 10G of kead tape to it to make it feel right for me.
3 weeks ago
Nice to see Lazarus golf clubs getting some credit for a change.
3 weeks ago
Took a chance and purchased the Lazarus putter and have used it several rounds this year. Didn’t take a lot of time to get used to it, felt more like a regular (non-zero) putter from the get go. From my experience it has been a great on lag and on medium putts (as per testing indicated). Short putts are a little less consistent. Still, it has been the best putter for me. Tried Lab and Square to Square each last summer my putting got worse on both putters as the summer went on.
3 weeks ago
Can you to add to “Don’t Buy This if” you are a left handed, since many of the club are not available in left handed models.
3 weeks ago
With the PuttView handicap methodology, are you able to accurately compare the results of the Blade, Mallet and ZT tests? Were they same the same group of testers for each test?
3 weeks ago
The winning Odyssey S2S putter is legit really impressive. I already own a LAB putter I had fitted for me, and I’m definitely not at standard specs. That S2S 7 still framed the ball well at address and despite the standard spec was tbh, better at long-distance (on the big box carpet) than my DF 2.1. Really pure roll. The at the time 550 price tag meant it was a no, but at 350, it’s awfully tempting.
The S2S 7 didn’t require the aggressive forward ball position, nor felt like I was pressing as fwd as I need to with my DF 2.1. (Either the 3 or 2 degree grip models.)
3 weeks ago
You had me hooked on the Sub 70 until I realized NO SPIDER! Cmon! It may have dominated, but we will never know!
3 weeks ago
Also missing the PXG HotRod model 😢
3 weeks ago
Running this test and not including the TaylorMade Spyder ZT, the zero torque version of one of the most popular putter models ever, is a wild choice.
3 weeks ago
I bought the Wilson model, took one hole to figure out the grip had to go. Was very happy with the putter though found it very effective after getting grip pressure right, I found ZT putter wants to do the work and grip pressure needs to be light.
3 weeks ago
It’s nice to see Vice, Wilson, and LAZRUS offering affordable options. Nice that there is something for the rest of us.
3 weeks ago
Good article! It’s interesting that LAB didn’t score anywhere on the list. I guess now you don’t have to drop $500 (& even more w/ a ‘special’ shaft’) to get a quality zero-torque putter. I use a PXG zero-torque model now & definitely feel my putting has improved. I previously had an older LAB model; I liked the concept but that model was really heavy & thus made downhill putts tricky.
It’s refreshing that you can still get some quality golf equipment w/o breaking the bank!
3 weeks ago
L.A.B clearly weren’t even in the test. They won last year with the OZ.1. This is the issue with mygolfspy. They must charge manufacturers to be included and if they don’t pay they don’t get in. Taylormade also don’t get included in a lot of their tests. It makes these already questionable tests rather pointless.
3 weeks ago
DF3.i was in the test. Try reading through all the results.
3 weeks ago
I agree XT 5K has a lot of good reviews, yet it is totally missing. Rather diminishes the tests and the results, which in the end will actually hurt mygolfspy.
3 weeks ago
2 LAB putters were included. I honestly missed the ‘whole’ list, I just focused on the ‘winners’. What I got out of the testing is that there now are a bunch of lower-cost zero torque models out there & I don’t need to drop $500-600 on LAB exclusively.
3 weeks ago
LAB OZ.1 is 19th on the list (page 2)
Fake
2 days ago
What is the Tommy Armour #4 ZT? I saw that they have a CB on their website. Is that it?