Callaway Chrome Soft X LS (Low Spin) Golf Ball
Golf Balls

Callaway Chrome Soft X LS (Low Spin) Golf Ball

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Callaway Chrome Soft X LS (Low Spin) Golf Ball
  • The Callaway Chrome Soft X LS gives Callaway a second legitimate offering in the tour ball category
  • CSX LS is a high launch, low spin ball that compares with the Titleist Pro V1x Left Dash and TaylorMade TP5x
  • Retail price is $47.99

More than a year into its latest Chrome Soft cycle, Callaway is introducing a new member of the family—the Chrome Soft X LS. As you might surmise, the LS stands for “low spin” and while it doesn’t replace anything in the current lineup, it does give Callaway a long-needed second option in the Tour ball category.

But What About …? No.

I’m barely a paragraph in and I can already sense some of you giving me the stink eye so let’s take a second for some real talk. Over the last several years, a yarn or two may have been spun suggesting otherwise but I don’t believe anyone at Callaway would reasonably classify the standard Chrome Soft as a “Tour ball.” It’s a solid 10 compression points softer than anything played on the PGA TOUR and “soft” is, well, a specification that doesn’t hold up to higher swing speeds.

In that respect, Callaway’s lineup was lacking. Every serious ball brand has two Tour options and, with the addition of Chrome Soft X LS, so does Callaway.

The dual-core construction of the prior-gen (2018) Chrome Soft X (left) and the dual mantle of the current generation – including Chrome Soft X LS (right).

Where CSX LS Came From

Chrome Soft X LS’s origin story isn’t entirely dissimilar from the Titleist Pro V1 Left Dash. The Titleist ball was a Tour-only secret menu offering (Titleist calls them “custom performance options” or CPOs) that went directly from the Tour to retail. Kinda.

Chrome Soft X LS evolved from a Tour-only secret menu ball, though this latest iteration was designed with retail in mind. The performance characteristics between the new ball and the prior Tour-only offering are similar. The most notable difference is an update in construction from a four-piece dual-core design to a four-piece dual-mantle construction that matches that of the current Chrome Soft X.

For what it’s worth, the guys playing the previous generation have, by and large, moved into the new ball.

A photo of the Callaway Chrome Soft X LS Golf ball

Chrome Soft X LS Performance

The Chrome Soft X LS offers the same firm compression as the standard Chrome Soft X but how Callaway gets there is what drives the performance differences.

As we’ve discussed before, spin (more accurately, high spin) is the product of wrapping firmer layers inside softer layers. Conversely, to reduce spin, manufacturers wrap softer layers inside firmer ones. To that end, relative to CSX, CSX LS has a softer core. By leveraging a firmer inner mantle, Callaway was able to maintain compression. The result is lower spin at the same speed though, depending on the player, it could potentially be a touch faster.

The total description of Chrome Soft X LS is one of a high-compression, high-launch, low-spin golf ball.

The comps in the marketplace should prove to be the Titleist ProV1x Left Dash, TaylorMade TP5x and, to a lesser extent, the Bridgestone Tour B X (it should be the lowest launching of this group).

Chrome Soft X LS – Who is It For?

Callaway has positioned Chrome Soft X LS as a ball for the better player who fights spin and wants to hit it farther.

I’d push back a bit and say that high speed, low spin and more distance aren’t the exclusive domain of better players but the messaging here is important. Over the last several years, Callaway has done an outstanding job of reaching a broad range of everyday golfers but perhaps hasn’t had the same success with better/elite golfers.

The reasons for that are likely as multi-faceted as its signature hex dimple pattern but the lack of options certainly wasn’t helping. The Chrome Soft X LS speaks to the reality that no one ball can address all the needs of higher swing speed players and creates more options for Callaway staffers (and fitters) to dial in the ideal combination of iron and golf ball.

Chrome Soft X LS Aerodynamics

We’ve discussed dimple patterns before and why there are inherent disadvantages to using the same cover on every ball. The patterns are the same on Chrome Soft X and Chrome Soft X LS in that they have the same hex pattern but that’s not to say they’re identical. Callaway has altered the geometry of the facets—the six bars that come together to form Callaway’s hex dimples—to optimize the aerodynamics around the performance profile of the Chrome Soft X LS.

The Battle Inside 40 Yards

When we’re able to fully test balls in the low-spin space, it’s possible we’ll find two to three yards off the driver between them. Maybe golfers will notice, maybe not. The likelihood is that the biggest observable differences will be inside 40 yards where things like greenside spin and, I suppose, even feel (and feel off the putter), enter the conversation.

Callaway believes the Chrome Soft X LS compares favorably in both areas. Acknowledging once again that everything is player dependent and choosing words carefully so as not to raise either the eyebrows or the pens of its competitors’ legal teams, Callaway says greenside spin will be similar to other balls in the low-spin space, but not lower.

a closeup of the Callaway Chrome Soft X LS golf ball

Where Chrome Soft X LS Fits in Callaway Lineup

Since all things in the golf equipment world are relative, I figure it might be helpful to clarify the position of all three Chrome Soft balls within the Callaway lineup.

Chrome Soft is low compression with high launch and low spin. The distance math works for iron shots but high-speed players will likely take a hit with their driver. It has a urethane cover but it’s not a Tour ball.

Chrome Soft X is high compression with the lowest launch and highest spin within the Chrome Soft family.

Chrome Soft X LS is high compression with higher launch and lower spin than the Chrome Soft X.

Which is right for you is ultimately a fitting question. That reality poses both an opportunity and a challenge for Callaway.

an image of the core of the Callaway Chrome Soft X LS yellow triple track golf ball.

Chrome Soft X LS – Full Retail Availability

By making Chrome Soft X LS available through all of its retail partners, Callaway hopes to seize the opportunity created by Titleist’s unwillingness (so far anyway) to mass distribute Left Dash.

There’s little doubt in my mind Left Dash is the longest Tour ball on market right now. There’s no doubt in my mind there’s a market for that so it strikes me as odd that Titleist has never directly hinted as much while continuing to maintain Left Dash’s position as the best ball nobody knows about.

If you know, you know. If you don’t, Titleist seems OK with it.

With CSX LS, Callaway is taking a more direct approach. Niche or not, “for a lot of players, it’s a better product,” says Jason Finley, Director of Brand and Product Management for Callaway. “They’re going to hit it farther and golfers want that.”

You don’t say.

Why wouldn’t you put your longest golf ball on every retail shelf and make sure everybody knows about it?

The answer is that there is a legitimate risk of golfers buying the wrong product for their game. They may even hold it against you.

Counter argument: That’s what golfers often do. It’s unavoidable.

While not every golfer (or nearly any golfer) is going to get fitted for a golf ball, Callaway is going to provide what Finley calls “selection guidance.” The idea is to help golfers understand if Chrome Soft X LS might be right for them but ultimately to make sure they have the tools (info and easy access to the ball) to make the performance decision for themselves.

Chrome Colors, Pricing and Availability

The Callaway Chrome Soft X LS will be available in White, White Triple Track and Yellow Triple Track, which brings me today’s Did You Know.

Did you know that Triple Track is Callaway’s best-selling option in every model where it’s offered? It outsells white. In any given week, 25 to 35 percent of Callaway’s PGA TOUR staff is using a Triple Track ball.

This “patterns on a golf ball” thing isn’t going away anytime soon. It’s probably time everyone got on board.

Retail price for the Callaway Chrome Soft X LS golf ball is $47.99. Availability begins March 18.

For more information, visit CallawayGolf.com.

For You

For You

Irons
Apr 24, 2024
PXG Irons: Model By Model
Putters
Apr 23, 2024
PING 2024 Putter Line Extension
News
Apr 23, 2024
Nelly Korda Deserves Her Caitlin Clark Moment, So Why Isn’t She Getting It?
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Jeff Chernes

      3 years ago

      Hey Tony,
      What’s the chances the LS will come in Truvis style?

      Reply

      W

      3 years ago

      Why not just take out the name Soft and call it The Chrome??? Duh.
      Clearly it’s no longer Soft……..

      Reply

      Max R

      3 years ago

      Is Callaway doing a similar virtual fitting as Bridgestone?

      Reply

      Chris

      3 years ago

      “This “patterns on a golf ball” thing isn’t going away anytime soon. It’s probably time everyone got on board.”

      Titliest, are you listening? I play TP5 and CS because of Pix and Truvis/ TT. I’d like to play a ProV again but won’t play a non patterned ball at this point.

      Reply

      Marq

      3 years ago

      I’d be willing to bet satire list isn’t jumping into the pool with this too quickly. Based on all the of Pro V1’s be fine, very few are yellow (even if you just count the most recent models). I wonder if Pro V1 players tend to be more conservative or traditional in terms of the color, w/b interesting to hear from some folks on this.

      Reply

      Gary

      3 years ago

      -ProV1X player here. Long time ProV1 family player. I very much agree with your assessment of conservative. Nothing against the patterned balls, but not for me. I’m a “less distraction is better” golfer when it comes to clubs and balls. At my club though, I do see increases in patterns and have nothing against them.

      Garen Eggleston

      3 years ago

      Not sure I can ever trust Callaway again after the great ball fiasco they ran for years , I like Titleist, Bridgestone and Srixon just fine

      Reply

      Andrew

      3 years ago

      Good article! There is a ball out to help everyone’s game. Can you imagine the average Joe Golfer that does not read MyGolfSpy? With so many different options that are completely dependent on the individual golfers swing speed/data, average Joe might be playing worse golf with more expensive balls and think its all his fault. Golf ball companies need to do a better job of explaining their product. MyGolfSpy to the rescue again! Thanks for always adding to my golf IQ!

      Reply

      It is my understanding that spin is the enemy with the driver for those with high clubhead speeds and the friend of those with lower clubhead speeds. The “longest ball”. But for whom? I believe that Titleist is smart enough to know that while the “left dash” might be longest for TOUR staff it might not be true for those with a sub-90 clubhead speed. Nothing like selling the “longest ball” only to disappoint. Not a way to build sales.

      Reply

      Lor

      3 years ago

      I think I just became a Callaway fan again…

      Reply

      Bob

      3 years ago

      What about the Graphene? The material was in all of its Chromesoft advertising not too long ago. Do they continue to use it or have they abandoned it?

      Reply

      Andrew

      3 years ago

      There’s goo in the Twitter picture Tony… TELL US ABOUT THE GOO

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      3 years ago

      Just a fun photo. Mantle layers have the lowest melting point. When I was pulling the ball apart, I it looked sort of fleshy and gross, so I took a photo.

      Reply

      Peter Sundell

      3 years ago

      Dude, clickbait. Not cool.

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Irons
    Apr 24, 2024
    PXG Irons: Model By Model
    Putters
    Apr 23, 2024
    PING 2024 Putter Line Extension
    News
    Apr 23, 2024
    Nelly Korda Deserves Her Caitlin Clark Moment, So Why Isn’t She Getting It?
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.