First Look: Callaway Rogue Irons
Irons

First Look: Callaway Rogue Irons

First Look: Callaway Rogue Irons

Rogue has been the victim of bad puns, wordplay, and Star Wars references since Tuesday when Callaway finally unveiled the new Rogue driver and fairway woods, but what does the word Rogue actually mean?

From Merriam-Webster:

Rogue: vagrant or tramp; a dishonest or worthless person, scoundrel; a horse inclined to shirk or misbehave; an individual or plant exhibiting inferior biological variation.

I don’t think that’s what Callaway had in mind.

The Cambridge Dictionary definition is a little better:

Rogue: a person, organization or country that does not behave in the usual or acceptable way.

It’s the Urban Dictionary that, I think, nailed the attitude Callaway is going for:

Rogue: a rebellious loner who follows his/her own rules.

That’s the first definition. The second definition is a little less flattering:

A prostitute who rejects the idea of pimps.

Ahh, the things you learn from Google

So, now that we’re all verbally grounded, let’s take a peek at Rogue’s three companion irons sets.

CALLAWAY ROGUE IRONS-601

Three Is The Number…

Yep, three. The first two are what you’d expect – the standard Rogue and its thinner, more compact big brother, the Rogue Pro. The unexpected is the Rogue X, a new player in a rapidly expanding niche. We’ll talk about Rogue X later, but first let’s discuss the, ahh, rogue elephants in the room.

Rogue and Rogue Pro replace the Steelhead XR and Steelhead XR Pro in the Callaway family of irons. No, there’s none of the another six-weeks and they’ll replace these nonsense. The Steelheads were introduced in September of 2016 (Pro was released about this time last year), so they’ve hung on for a reasonable run. And not for nothing…Callaway’s flagship Apex iron is still going strong at 2.5 years.

Callaway Rogue Irons-501

Rogue and Rogue Pro are Game Improvement irons, and as such are aimed directly at the big ol’ fat, meaty part of the golfing market. That’s the segment the Steelheads dominated in 2017. Much fuss was made about bringing back both the Steelhead name and the bore-through hosel design, so it’s curious that Callaway would dump both after just one cycle, but apparently, that’s what rebellious loners who follow their own rules do.

In fact, Callaway says the new tech in Rogue really makes it an entirely new family of clubs, with a whole new level of performance. Whether the upgrades are, in fact, game-changing technical breakthroughs remains to be seen, but there are enough refinements to make for a compelling story. And the story of Rogue is distance combined with feel. I didn’t say it was a new story.

Callaway Rogue Irons-509

Face Cup, VFT, and Medicated Goo

Go back to any MyGolfSpy irons story over the past two years and you’ll find a common theme regardless of OEM: face deflection for higher ball speeds. Whether it’s PING, TaylorMade, Cobra, PXG or Wilson, the story is the same – thin out the face and make the entire face hotter so you don’t lose as much distance on off-center hits.

Callaway’s recipe for the Rogue features its 360 Face Cup combined with VFT or Variable Face Technology.

“In the case of Apex and Steelhead XR, we were on a journey learning how to optimize Face Cups in irons,” says Dr. Alan Hocknell, Callaway’s Senior VP of R&D. “With Rogue, we think we’ve gone beyond what we’ve had before.”

Callaway Rogue Irons-517

Hocknell says Callaway has combined an even thinner face with some premium laser welding techniques to create a face that’s more energetic than its previous iterations, which means more ball speed.

However, and there’s always a however, thin-faced irons tend to have sound and feel issues. “If you have a thin-faced iron that produces high balls speeds, the face deflection is larger than before,” says Hocknell. “That means there’s a greater amount of vibration after impact.”

Hocknell says with thin-faced irons the vibration is louder, lasts longer and has a higher pitch – all of which we interpret as feel.

Any thin-faced or hollow-bodied iron faces this particular conundrum, and each OEM uses its own type of filler material to mitigate some of the harshness – i.e., TaylorMade’s SpeedFoam, PING’s Santoprene or Wilson’s TE 031 Urethane.

The problem with filler material, says Hocknell, is that while it does dampen vibration, it can also restrict face deflection.

“That’s the problem,” says Hocknell. “What do you want? Do you want high ball speed or great sound? We’ve tried to look for a filler material that controls the sound without reducing COR.”

Callaway’s solution: Urethane Microspheres.

“We’re effectively filling the lower half of the cavity with a material that is based on a soft urethane, softer than the type you’d find in the cover of our golf balls. But then we’re effectively making that material porous by filling it with thousands and thousands of microscopic hollow glass spheres.” Alan Hocknell, Callaway Golf

Hocknell says unlike foam or other types of filler, Urethane Microspheres won’t restrict face flex because there’s some give to it.

“If you fill a cavity with a material that is soft but solid in nature, the volumetric constraint of that cavity makes that soft material behave in a much more firm manner,” says Hocknell. “There’s nowhere for the material to go when it’s squashed, and therefore it’s a lot more rigid.”

Callaway Rogue Iron 20

Hocknell says that type of filler helps the sound issue, but you pay a ball speed penalty. Urethane Microspheres, says Callaway, are more porous and the Microspheres themselves change shape and flatten at impact, giving the urethane room to flex along with the face, which allows you to maintain better ball speed no matter where you hit it on the face.

MIM’d ISW

One of Steelhead’s tech stories was using the hollow bore-through hosel, as well as a longer blade length, as means to position the Center of Gravity in the center of the scorelines, and optimizing the CG for each iron in the set. With Rogue, Callaway is essentially doing the same thing, only different.

Last year Callaway introduced the Epic and Epic Pro iron sets, both premium-priced, technology-laden clubs aimed at the PXG end of the market. In reality, the Epic irons were Callaway’s version of a concept car, with the technology eventually cascading into mainstream products. MIM’d (or Metal Injection Molding) tungsten, and what Callaway is calling a Tungsten-infused Internal Standing Wave has found its way into the mainstream with Rogue.

Callaway Rogue Irons-518

“MIM’d weight allows us to combine tungsten and steel together,” says Hocknell. “We control the shape of the weight, and we can choose the position of that weight inside the head differently by loft through the set.”

By positioning the CG uniquely in each iron, Callaway is optimizing launch – essentially flighting – the entire set. The CG is extremely low in the long irons to promote easier launch and higher flight, and it gets progressively higher as the lofts go up in the shorter irons for greater control.

The differences between Rogue and Rogue Pro are what you’d expect. The Rogue is the more forgiving iron, while Rogue Pro tends more towards the better player end with all the same tech in a smaller package. The Pro has less offset, a thinner topline, and a thinner sole.

Callaway provided the media with a recorded interview with Hocknell, and hidden at the 10:25 mark of the 19-minute video was the first – and only – reference to distance improvements: maybe a half club to a full club longer than previous iterations, especially if you don’t hit the center of the face all the time.

Which is most of us.

Callaway Rogue Irons-507

About That Rogue X

Rogue X, the third member of the Rogue family, is the newest player in a growing niche: the aging golfer in need of a little more distance. XXIO is the leader in this lightweight, tech-heavy market, which Callaway tried to crack last year with the premium-priced Epic Star.

Callaway says Epic Star was originally aimed at the Japanese market and was quite the hit over there. Rogue X certainly appears to be the mainstream version of Epic Star.

“It was time to take all of the technology that was in Epic and configure it in a way that was little more aggressive,” says Hocknell. That means what you’d think it means – stronger lofts (by 3 to 4 degrees), longer club lengths and overall lighter weight, by about 10 grams per club.

CALLAWAY ROGUE IRONS-600

And the kicker? While Epic Star priced out at $300 per club and $2,400.00 per set, the Rogue X, with similar tech, is priced at $899 steel/$999 graphite.

Loft jacking? Yeah, but as always, there’s more to it than that. Jacking lofts alone won’t help slower swing speed players because you still have to get the ball up in the air.

“To compare 7-iron to 7-iron, the concern is can you still launch a club that’s got less loft in the same way? Compared to the standard Rogue, we’ve got a slight larger, more oversized type head and a slightly wider sole. It gives us the opportunity to make the center of gravity depth a little greater, which helps us with the ease of getting the ball up in the air. It essentially allows us to take loft away without losing launch angle.” – Alan Hocknell, Callaway Golf

Rogue X certainly seems to crossover into the Super Game Improvement arena, both in spec and in physical size, and appears to be a replacement for the Big Bertha OS. Rogue. It’s a club for the player looking for lost distance, but Hocknell says we shouldn’t pigeonhole it as a club for Baby-boomers afflicted with sagging pectorals.

“They do have that oversized look to them, a little bit more offset, a little larger head,” says Hocknell. “But it’s not just the preserve of people who might have slow swings. It’s actually for Game Improvement people who want to try and hit with more power.”

Callaway Rogue Irons-505

Specs, Availability, and Price

SPEC-ROGUE-IRON-FAMILY

The specs for both the Rogue and the Rogue Pro are about what you’d expect for irons in the Game Improvement category: a little stronger for the Rogue, a little weaker for the Rogue Pro.

The stock steel shaft for the Rogue is the True Temper XP 95, while the stock graphite is the Aldila Synergy 60. The stock shaft in the Rogue Pro is the True Temper XP 105. Lamkin grips are standard for both, and Callaway is offering a host of shaft options. The standard Rogue will sell for $899.99 in steel, $999.99 in graphite. Rogue Pro is available stock in steel only, and lists for $999.99.

Rogue X features stronger lofts across the board, with longer iron lengths in the 4- through the 6-iron.

The stock shaft in Rogue X is the KBS Max 90 in steel, and the Aldila  Synergy 60 in graphite. Again, Lamkin grips are standard, and the Rogue X sells for $899.99 in steel, $999.99 in graphite.

There’s also a Women’s Rogue – lighter and wider-soled than the men’s versions, with a larger cavity and lower CG. Those irons are also priced at $899.99 in steel and $999.99 in graphite.

Callaway Rogue Irons-513

All Rogues will be available for pre-sale starting tomorrow. The men’s versions will be in stores February 9th, while the women’s Rogue hits retail March 2nd.

For more information, visit CallawayGolf.com.

To see more photos of the Rogue Family of Irons, check out the gratuitous picture thread in the MyGolfSpy forum.

For You

For You

Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024 Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024
Buyer's Guides
Apr 12, 2024
Best Spikeless Golf Shoes of 2024
First Look
Apr 12, 2024
Under Armour’s Cheesy Take on the Masters
News
Apr 12, 2024
PING WebFit: Get Fit From your Phone
John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

John is an aging, yet avid golfer, writer, 6-point-something handicapper living back home in New England after a 22-year exile in Minnesota. He loves telling stories, writing about golf and golf travel, and enjoys classic golf equipment. “The only thing a golfer needs is more daylight.” - BenHogan

John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

Shot Scope V5 Golf Watch
Apr 3, 2024 | 14 Comments
Driver Shopping Do’s and Don’ts
Mar 29, 2024 | 5 Comments
John Barba

John Barba

John Barba





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Jeff

      5 years ago

      I hit the apex 7 iron. Great club until I was told the cost. This is why golf is dying except for the elite. And half of those players cant break 90. Shame on golf

      Reply

      TomEP

      6 years ago

      Ok, I’m a 3 handicap, used to be +1, been playing the x forged irons for years and was ready for a little more help. I had 2 fitting sessions to make sure and hit many different irons, Apex CF 16, Taylor Made P790, Ping i700, PXG, Callaway Rogue Pro, and after all that, Rogue Pro one. For feel, off center hits, total distance and consistent distance, AND, they friggin are shaped like blades with no off set when you look down on them. The P790’s were a very close second, but the Rogue Pro was noticeably better when hit off the toe and low on the club face. I see a lot of you slamming these clubs, but I’m more than a happy customer. These clubs kick ass and out performed the other clubs I tested. Note; PXG’s we’re awesome too, just not better. Couldn’t justify the price difference.

      Reply

      Gabe tarr

      6 years ago

      They better be good, I was completely talked out of the Ping G400 and into getting these, if they suck after waiting almost 3 weeks for them, I’m going to be pissed. I’m already pissed after reading some of these comments.

      Reply

      Robert Dwyer

      6 years ago

      All I see is an Apex Iron with a face lift?

      Reply

      KM

      6 years ago

      Fugly….

      Reply

      NEF

      6 years ago

      Guys – seriously. How much difference does it make if you a 7 or 8 iron when you used to use a f or 6? Yes, there is a difference in ball flight. How significant is it? Other than ego and the maybe one or two greens that the ball stops a little better from a higher ball flight, is it worth a couple of thousand dollars? If you believe the OEM marketing, by now the clubs should launch themselves, and a 9 iron reach 250 yards. Always better, always longer once or twice a year. What’s scheduled for 6 months from now, a Super Rogue because they’ve found a way to improve (???) it again? I’ll stay with my “old” clubs that are two and a half year old technology and may be a 1 stroke difference on a good day.

      Reply

      Kenny B

      6 years ago

      From Facebook a couple of years ago…

      “A frequent request we get from golfers is, ‘Bring back the Steelhead!’ We’ve answered with our new Steelhead XR.” –Dr. Alan Hocknell, SVP of R&D

      I don’t remember anyone requesting that Callaway bring back the Steelhead, but apparently there wasn’t that much interest since it was now been replaced.

      I can only surmise that Callaway retiring the Steelhead name means that they are able to once again resurrect the name in another 10-15 years because people want it brought back… again!!

      Reply

      The Cranberries

      6 years ago

      Where is callaways hollow design club?

      Taylormade’s P790 killed it last fall, I had several of my friends with them and they claim its the best club they have ever hit. They don’t even know each other. Now the Ping 700 will be out, it looks sharp and is similar design

      Reply

      Tony Wright

      6 years ago

      Anyone able to find the club set specs for the different Rogue irons? If you can find a link please let me know. I cannot find it on the Callaway site or anywhere else so far.

      Reply

      Omri

      6 years ago

      Oh look …. new stickers …

      Reply

      Matt Bellner

      6 years ago

      Callaway XR OS or Steelhead® — ? If a golfer wanted to game one of those sets of iron before upgrading to the Rogue in the Summer, which set does MGS recommend? NOT asking for a friend.

      Reply

      John Nolan

      6 years ago

      Hmm…not looking good for Apex 2018 CF to materialize

      Reply

      Grant Guthrie

      6 years ago

      Callaway seems to know no shame they keep changing labels on their clubs annually. XR., STEELHEAD, BIG BERTHA, EPIC, EPIC STAR, and now…..ROGUE

      REALLY GUYS.
      Admittedly the branding works via name recognition but “common man”

      Reply

      Bobby Goodman

      6 years ago

      It’s fascinating that Callaway should dump the Steelhead line after so much hype. I am a blade guy but have hit Steelhead Pros and found them to be very good. Everyone who tesred them said the same. I am a strong proponent of a bored through hozel. In particular, I was a big fan of the shape of the SF Pros (hi toe and narrow at the heel). It would be interesting to get the real story why it was abandoned. It will forever baffle me why manufacturers need 7+ sets of irons at the same time.

      Reply

      Dave

      6 years ago

      And there you have it another new set from Callaway . And just after you spent $2400.00 on the best yet you can now buy the best for $899.00 perfect . Wow and I can now hit my 7 iron just as far as my old 5 iron . REALLY. Sorry Callaway you are not on any radar list I follow. I’ll stick with mizuno thanks. As always good write up . P.S I know I don’t have to buy them.

      Reply

      Eric A Fletcher

      6 years ago

      wow! I like it! Just bought the Steel heads though…

      Reply

      Joe Domill

      6 years ago

      I have steelheads I really wonder how much of difference there is. I would like to see how they are tested by the average slow swinger

      Reply

      Jerry

      6 years ago

      I really don’t want to pile on here but I’ve always found it astonishing that golf magazines will pass along the tech speak without question or testing. I know that’s a tough task with every new release but has anyone ever proven that tungsten provides more backspin than magnesium? Your write up does say something that somewhat rings true in filling cavities with goop can diminish rebound. Now we all know a tennis racket with strings will flex and rebound and importantly put spin on hits. But I have always questioned irons flexing enough to really matter for the average guy. Drivers yes. Their faces are extremely thin and testing shows added face milling can increase distance. So I remain skeptical on irons. I do believe in perimeter weighting and lowering weight distribution somewhat as effective for most. But would really like some test data or high speed photo evidence that proves these claims. Thanks.

      Reply

      Marc

      6 years ago

      Where does it say that tungsten spins more than magnesium? I don’t even see the word magnesium in this article?

      Reply

      Jerry

      6 years ago

      The Tungsten reference is euphemistic. What I am saying is that most all golf articles parrot the mfg without any sidebar questioning evidence that their claims are true. Take the PXG design with the inserts everywhere. It would be fun to unscrew the metal plugs (whatever they are made out of) and substitute shower and tub caulk and do a blind test to see the difference.

      TexasSnowman

      6 years ago

      Not Attractive. I must be a niche market: I like irons that are elegant and understated. These huge Logos and Badges just look cheesy to me.

      Reply

      BR

      6 years ago

      Nice early review. Will be interested to see how these irons perform against their competition in future testing. Thanks MGS

      Reply

      Steve Hamer

      6 years ago

      LPGA is having a demo day sun 19th. will try them out

      Reply

      John Diamantakis

      6 years ago

      Boy do i need all the hyperspheres i could use.

      Reply

      Jim Ericksen

      6 years ago

      I just bought the Steelhead XR’s a year ago. A very nice performing iron that the ball jumps off of the face and is consistent for me. The only thing I could possibly want would be maybe a 1/2 club longer in distance…..I think I will take them to my pro shop and have them tweak the loft…..that’s a heck of a lot cheaper than a new set of irons!

      Reply

      Nigel Kent

      6 years ago

      So , around 5000 words of company bull . Where’s the unbiased , independent review ? This site has become nothing more than a free advert for the “big boys” . I’ve been with you for 5 years , but I’m unsubscribing now . Effective Jan 18th 2018 .

      Reply

      Nick

      6 years ago

      This article is simply making people aware of a new release and does not claim to be a review of any kind. I’m sure the only information the author had to work with is what is available from Callaway. How could they possibly do a proper review the same day the product was launched?

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      6 years ago

      Exactly, Nigel appears upset that we didn’t half-ass our way through a review. Our tests take literal weeks to complete and require thousands of shots.

      Consider that next time you fawn over a same-day “review”.

      Also – more discerning eyes may have noticed that we have only 1 iron from each set, and there’s really not much intelligible to be learned from a mix of 4, 6, and 9 irons.

      Sherwin

      6 years ago

      This article was not a review of the product. It was an information piece letting us know of new equipment coming out. It detailed the product and what the company states about the product in an non-bias way, in my opinion.

      If the irons are crap after testing, I am sure MGS will stated that.

      What did you want them to say or do? Be negative on a product before it is tested.

      Reply

      Dru

      6 years ago

      Do these irons feature the same jailbreak tech as the Epic line?

      Reply

      Chad Mardesen

      6 years ago

      Urethane microspheres are great..but when are they going to add flavor crystals?

      Reply

      Jordan

      6 years ago

      In all honesty, if I didn’t already know these were the successor to the Epic’s, based on looks alone I wouldn’t be able to pick these out amongst Walmart Irons. These are gross.

      Reply

      JimmyZgolf

      6 years ago

      I saw another commentator ask about performance of the filler at different temp gradients and I have the same questions. I have another question: What is the effect of the extreme high and low temps that clubs experience over time in a hot/cold garage or car trunk? Will the performance of any club with a synthetic filler degrade over time. Is there a shorter life expectancy for clubs with fillers?

      Reply

      Money Long Like Anaconda

      6 years ago

      These clubs are HIDEOUS at address. Callaway going mental

      Reply

      Rod

      6 years ago

      To me, these look pretty similar to M1 & M2 irons.

      Same ol’

      Reply

      DoubleMochaMan

      6 years ago

      Lots of places for mud, dirt and grass to collect on the backside. These puppies are going to need a bath after every round!

      Reply

      Tim Dotson

      6 years ago

      Now that I know urethane microspheres exist, how can I Swing a club that doesn’t have them?

      Reply

      Jimbo

      6 years ago

      More concerned with ever increasing club length as I don’t appear to be getting any taller with age. Increased club length may help in reason distance but get progressively harder to control

      Reply

      SV677

      6 years ago

      Agree about the length. Specs aren’t given on the website, but if the lofts are stronger than previously, at what point do we get to 25* 7 irons and 4 or 5 “gap” wedges?

      Reply

      James T

      6 years ago

      Perhaps they could make a version that would give you even more distance and call it Rogue Gain. You could use it for hair loss, too.

      Reply

      Brandon Wooley

      6 years ago

      Of course I need urethane microspheres. My inverted cones just aren’t cutting it anymore.

      Reply

      Foz

      6 years ago

      Great write up, John. These are the best looking new clubs on the market. If I did not already have Hogan’s in my bag, I would def be gaming the Rogues.

      Reply

      Mike

      6 years ago

      Third definition of Rogue: Butt Ugly clubs, that are two clubs stronger than marked.

      Reply

      DaveyD

      6 years ago

      I wonder about the effect of cooler outdoor temperatures on the microspheres in terms of feel and distance. Could be nothing or could be something.

      Reply

      Lou

      6 years ago

      Don’t think CALLAWAY is destined to have a sales year like last. Rogue seems a poor choice of name vs. Epic. Epic was epic! So were the clubs. Rogues in all categories will, I believe, fall way short of 2017’s Epic (not enough real difference), Taylormade and, particularly, Cobra (drivers).

      Reply

      Kanonito

      6 years ago

      Agree on the Epic driver, but the Epic irons… I honestly hated them…

      Reply

      Johnny Cowboy

      6 years ago

      Epic was stupid, Rogue is better.

      Reply

      Vern - One0wonder

      6 years ago

      Another great article John. The Rogue looks intriguing but for now I think I will stick with my Apex irons. I will be very interested in seeing exactly how much difference the Rogue technology will make if and when you do one of MGS’s great studies. Of course that will only happen if Callaway decides to come on board as a contributor of clubs for testing. Keep up the good work, John.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024 Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024
    Buyer's Guides
    Apr 12, 2024
    Best Spikeless Golf Shoes of 2024
    First Look
    Apr 12, 2024
    Under Armour’s Cheesy Take on the Masters
    News
    Apr 12, 2024
    PING WebFit: Get Fit From your Phone
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.