First Look: Wilson Staff Launch Pad Irons
Irons

First Look: Wilson Staff Launch Pad Irons

First Look: Wilson Staff Launch Pad Irons

Golf, it’s been said here many times, is a game.

And games are supposed to be fun.

But there’s not a blessed thing fun about a day spent chunking the ball fat. No matter how much you practice and no matter how many lessons you take, chunking can turn a lovely day on the course into a four-course meal in a one-star diner in Hell. It happens to the best of us.

And to those of us who aren’t the best.

If you’re s a chronic chunker, OEMs feel your pain. So far this fall, we’ve seen the Cobra T-Rail hybrid iron set and Cleveland’s updated Launcher HB Turbo, and over the summer Tour Edge released its HL4 Iron-Wood set. Wilson Staff, however, may be setting a new standard for forgiveness today with its new Launch Pad irons.

Sole Power

“We built in some performance into the sole to prevent the worst of all shots for a lot of inconsistent players, which is hitting the ball fat,” says Jon Pergande, Wilson’s Manager of Golf Club Innovation. “Most of the time, this type of player feels they’d rather hit the ball solidly and miss the green left or right than get nothing by laying the sod over the top of it.”

The chunks are no fun at all.

The new Launch Pad irons are a departure from recent Wilson offerings. First off, you’ll note there’s no D designation, even though Launch Pad most definitely fits into the Super-Duper Game Improvement category. Second, not since the mid-’80s and the Turf Rider has Wilson released a hollow-body iron.

“At the time, those were very novel, but they were trying to solve the same problem we’re trying to solve now,” says Pergande. “How do we get someone to hit the ball farther, with less effort and with a whole lot more confidence when they aren’t very solid in their game?”

The first thing you see with Launch Pad is the sole. Each club has more sole than Aretha, Marvin, and all Four Tops put together. That extra-wide sole, combined with the hollow construction, gets the center of gravity to damn near subterranean levels, especially in the long irons. The combination of low CG and a wide, flat sole helps golfers get the ball in the air while giving the chunks a run for their money.

“A wider sole is not going to dig in,” says Pergande. “There’s more surface area on the sole to contact the ground. There’s also the bounce angle, the angle of the sole, and then there’s the camber – the radius from front to back, and how that interacts with the ground.”

One thing about wide sole irons is the flatter the sole, the more attack angle matters. If you have a steep attack, you need either more bounce or a more pronounced camber. “What we’re trying to do here is get the right level of camber to bounce,” says Pergande. “The wider the sole, the less overall bounce you want because you still need to get the clubface to the ball.”

“If you get too flat, which is what we found with some of our competitors when we did our testing, you can still dig the front end into the ground because the actual sole is not getting to the surface. You want to make sure you have some piece of that sole that’s in contact with the ground to get the club, for lack of a better word, to skip across the turf.”

There’s a noticeable difference in sole width as you move from Launch Pad’s short to long irons. The 4-iron is by far the widest, while the 9-iron and pitching wedge soles are a bit more in line with typical Super Game Improvement irons.

“Any time you’re hitting a full shot with a 9-iron or a pitching wedge, players have a good expectation of success,” says Pergande. “It’s really the mid- and long irons where people really struggle, trying to overswing.”

The closest comp to Launch Pad is the Cleveland Launcher HB Turbo. The Turbo’s long irons have a definite hybrid look to them, and while no one would ever call LaunchPad slender, it does look somewhat more iron-like, with extra emphasis on somewhat. There’s unmistakable junk in the trunk on the long irons, but Wilson had done a good job of camouflaging the backside in the short irons to make them look, well, like irons. Sort of.

If you insist on a thin topline, these won’t make you happy.

But then again, they’re not meant for you.

73% Less Chunky?

In its press release, Wilson claims its testing shows that, for the everyday player, Launch Pad can reduce fat shots by 73%.

We couldn’t let that one pass unquestioned.

“We had several self-identified high-frequency duffers in for testing,” says Pergande. “We started by identifying shots with their own clubs, then with our competitors’ clubs, and then with Launch Pad. We wanted to find the likelihood of hitting a clean shot, a fat shot, and thin shot, or some other kind of shot. What we found was when you compare these to their gamers, it’s a pure numbers game of shots that are hit fat.”

Pergande says each player hit about 200 shots with their own clubs, another 200 with competitors’ clubs and another 200 with Launch Pad. “With Launch Pad, the probability of hitting a fat shot goes way down. You just don’t hit them with Launch Pad. And the likelihood of a clean shot goes way up.”

That claim, of course, comes from Wilson. As of this writing, there’s only been one instance of an OEM supplying MyGolfSpy with internal testing where its own product didn’t outperform the competition, and even that one came with an asterisk.

As claims go, this one sounds bold, but it depends on what you’re comparing to Launch Pad. A late-season session at the heated driving range (it’s snow season here in New Hampshire) shows Launch Pad to be ridiculously easy to get airborne. While mats aren’t ideal for this kind of test, hitting it fat was next to impossible.

And did we mention high? Yeah, the Launch Pads launch high.

Who Are They For?

If you like to play golf but hate hitting it fat, and want clubs that’ll help you, you’ll find a friend in Launch Pad. If you’re chomping at the bit to write GET LESSONS! in the Comments section, just remember two things: we were all high handicappers once, and some people play this game for kicks.

And even though Wilson insists they tried to make Launch Pad look as iron-like as possible, it’s not going to fool anybody. That said, for the category, it’s not a bad looking stick.

“We put these in the hands of better players, and the comments tend to bias toward the long irons,” says Pergande. “If you’re a high single-digit handicapper, picture a long shot – 170 to 200 yards – it’s really just about hitting the ball straight, confidently and cleanly to get the best result. It’s not about sticking it close from that distance; it’s more about don’t hit a bad shot.”

While hollow body, low CG irons aren’t new, we are seeing OEMs paying attention to what had been an underserved market, one that’s larger than many realize. And while MyGolfSpy consistently states you should play the most game improvement iron you can stand to look at, it’s safe to say more people should be playing irons like these than are actually playing irons like these.

“With an iron like D7, it’s a forgiving iron, but it’s all about distance through ball speed,” says Pergande. “It’s the longest iron in our arsenal, but that assumes the contact is on the face of the club. Launch Pad helps get the ball to the center of the club. It’s solving a problem. There are enough golf fanatics out there looking for a better way to play the game, looking to get more enjoyment out of the game. That’s what will bring people to a product like this.”

GET FIT FOR YOUR GAME WITH TRUEGOLFFIT™

Unbiased. No Guesswork. All Major Brands. Matched To Your Swing. Advanced Golf Analytics matches the perfect clubs to your exact swing using connected data and machine learning.

FREE FITTING

Price, Specs, and Availability

If you’re expecting Launch Pad to feature seriously jacked lofts, you might be somewhat disappointed, or maybe a little relieved. It’s the new normal to see Game Improvement and SGI 7-iron lofts in the 26- to 27-degree range, but the Launch Pad 7-iron comes in at a relatively un-jacked 30-degrees. Yeah, it’s more than your blade or player’s cavity back, but it’s certainly not outrageous. In fact, the lofts on the 7-iron through pitching wedge (44-degrees) are identical to the lofts on the Cleveland Launcher HB Turbo. Cleveland’s lofts on the long irons, however, are a degree or so stronger than those on the Wilsons.

LaunchPad comes in a 4-PW set in both men’s and women’s models (set-matching Gap and Sand wedges are sold separately). The stock shafts are obvious fits for the target golfer: for the men, it’s the KBS Tour 80 in steel and the UST-Mamiya Recoil 460 in graphite, with the Wilson Staff Crossline the stock grip. The stock swing weight for the entire set is D0.

The women’s stock set is graphite only, featuring the lightweight, high-launching UST-Mamiya Helium shaft and the Wilson Staff Women’s Performance grip. The women’s set is swing weighted at C6.5.

Both the men’s and women’s models are available for lefties and righties.

Launch Pad will retail at $699.99 in steel, $799.99 in graphite. They’ll be available for pre-order on Wilson’s website starting December 17th, and will be in stores January 13th.

For You

For You

Best Spiked Golf Shoes Best Spiked Golf Shoes
Buyer's Guides
Apr 26, 2024
Best Spiked Golf Shoes of 2024
Golf Balls
Apr 26, 2024
Ball Lab: Callaway Chrome Tour 2024
News
Apr 26, 2024
Why You Need to Book a Links Golf Trip Across the Pond
John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

John is an aging, yet avid golfer, writer, 6-point-something handicapper living back home in New England after a 22-year exile in Minnesota. He loves telling stories, writing about golf and golf travel, and enjoys classic golf equipment. “The only thing a golfer needs is more daylight.” - BenHogan

John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

John Barba





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Ed M.

      2 years ago

      As a 64-YO “high handicapper” who shoots consistently in the 90s (and has for the last couple of years) on most courses I play, I finally took the plunge and bought a set of these Launch Pads. My first impression was that they were the ugliest clubs I’d ever seen, but after three rounds, the last an 87, I think they are the most beautiful. If George Jetson played golf, he’d use these.. Well balanced, solid and accurate. Well done, Wilson.

      Reply

      Danny

      4 years ago

      I’m 75 and DONT hit my irons fat. I never take a divot but have a sweeping swing. Love my fairway woods and hit them well, 5,7,9 and 4 hybrid. Will these work as well as my fairway woods? Thank you and always enjoy you’re reviews

      Reply

      John McKee

      4 years ago

      Planning to try them out in January

      Reply

      Neil Room

      4 years ago

      I’ve pre-ordered a set and they should be arriving end of January. I can’t wait to try them. I’m new to the game only been playing for 3 months and I don’t really care what clubs look like. I’ve not played 18 holes yet, still just playing the par 3 academy course, hopefully these will give me the confidence to get out and play with the big boys.

      Reply

      Bowser

      4 years ago

      Welcome to the game! If this helps you enjoy the game and have fun with it then Wilson is not the only winner. Let us know how you do with them please.

      I’ve been playing W/S irons since the Di 7 with the Fat Shaft to now with the C300. I’ve always found their game improvement irons to be helpful.

      Reply

      Adrian

      4 years ago

      Absolutely they are really durable and it actually surprises me that they have stood up so well. The only time put put head covers on them is when I travel but they are super durable. The faces are forged but the body of the club is made of a very tough and durable steel so they still feel soft through impact. I hotmelted my to get the swing weight to where I wanted it as I am a high swing weight player. You definitely don’t have to baby them at all.

      Reply

      Eggnog Soup

      4 years ago

      Has Wilson come out with anything original in the last few years? First copying the nike mojo, now launchers, the “driver vs driver” debacle, duo/duo urethane. A company with less than 1% share has to differentiate somehow and bombing twice with a TV show and copying products at a cheaper price point isn’t working. What rhymes with hemorrhaging funds?

      Reply

      Jim

      4 years ago

      If you don’t like Wilson stuff, don’t play them. No need to insult their clubs. Many people love them.

      Reply

      Adrian

      4 years ago

      These are the types of irons that most people should be playing but their ego gets in the way. I have been playing the Cleveland 588 altitude irons for years now and I am a 5 handicap. These types of clubs just flat out work and you can hit any shot that can be hit with a blade. To each his or her own but these types of clubs should not be ignored when testing clubs.

      Reply

      TIm

      4 years ago

      Your right “Should Be” but other then making a tee time, the most fun you can have is playing the equipment you want (even if it makes your game suck, who cares) Fact shooting 90 with PXG irons is 100% more fun then shooting 90 with your dad’s old top flite irons…

      Reply

      jjgolf65

      4 years ago

      You are 100% correct. I sort of read reviews like this and roll my eyes when the writer says “they clubs are for golfers looking to have fun.” I gotta say… what golfers AREN’T looking to have fun??

      I’ve been hitting the competitor to this from Cleveland and it’s not like it’s an unfair advantage. The ball doesn’t really go farther and if I hit “off” a bit, it shows in the ball flight. It’s simply a club that is well designed for golfers who aren’t always 100% perfect through the turf.

      Isn’t that what Callaway, TaylorMade, etc., trying to do with each and every generation of golf club?? “This club hits farther… this club hits easier… this club hits… etc.”

      Would any of us be surprised if Wilson’s launchpad took off and Cleveland’s gained momentum, that Callaway and TM offered an iron with a similar design in a year or two??

      Reply

      Melvyn Walker

      4 years ago

      Hello Adrian
      Do these type of irons stand up well to knocks and bangs etc in the bag or would you use covers as on conventional hybrids. The playing benefits seem to be great.
      Mel

      Reply

      Adrian

      4 years ago

      Absolutely they are really durable and it actually surprises me that they have stood up so well. The only time put put head covers on them is when I travel but they are super durable. The faces are forged but the body of the club is made of a very tough and durable steel. You definitely don’t have to baby them at all.

      Zimmer

      3 years ago

      per Adrian ” The faces are forged ” ?
      Are you talking about the Wilson Launch Pads ?
      I haven’t seen any specs that suggest they’re forged at all.

      Plaidjacket

      4 years ago

      I first saw these on an ad of some kind the other day. I think it was golf digest or something. Anyway… I like what Wilson and others are doing with these types of club/irons. I recall way back in the early 80’s Browning made a set of irons that looked very similar to these. I had a friend with a set. I would highly recommend irons like these to chronic hackers, older players, beginners, women, etc. Average occasional golfers. I’ve actually been toying recently with a replacement for my 4i. I’ve looked at perhaps trying a Tour Edge 4i. Now maybe a Wilson LP 4i if they sell a single iron. I’ve also lately gone back to trying one of my 4 HB’s but still not sold on Hybrids. Over all a good article. I’m all for introducing people to golf and helping more of them play (and enjoy) this rotten game..

      Reply

      David Dimmich

      4 years ago

      I’ve been a Wilson devotee for many years because while I’ve never put any stock in golf magazine club tests, one thing that jumped out at me was that low handicap golfers didn’t like Wilson irons because they had trouble shaping shots with them. They claimed the ball always went straight. That’s all I needed to to hear! If there was no name or any kind of identifying mark on clubs, my guess is the testing results would look much different!

      Reply

      Oweno2

      4 years ago

      It would seem like we have some choices in this emerging category. Would really like to see some non biased testing between the four brands…. Wilson,Cleveland,Tour Edge, and Cobra with some mid to high handicap plays(10-20) as It seems Wilson is saying they are for the 10+ players.

      I have been ready to buy the Cleveland’s but now I have choices…….

      Reply

      JD2

      4 years ago

      I second this comment…. I was leaning cobra but now want to wait and see. Also would love to see a comparison of the launcher hb, T rail, HL4, and launchpad by someone who would actually play them, a higher handicap golfer like myself

      Reply

      Will

      4 years ago

      Probably will help some players, if cost is reasonable enough. Are wheels included or must they be purchased as an extra???

      Reply

      Tim

      4 years ago

      Are these made along side the same type of Tour Edge irons at the factory in China?

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Best Spiked Golf Shoes Best Spiked Golf Shoes
    Buyer's Guides
    Apr 26, 2024
    Best Spiked Golf Shoes of 2024
    Golf Balls
    Apr 26, 2024
    Ball Lab: Callaway Chrome Tour 2024
    News
    Apr 26, 2024
    Why You Need to Book a Links Golf Trip Across the Pond
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.