It is arguably one of the most popular golf infomercials ever. From one of the most recognized faces in the history of golf gear.
That’s right; Jack Hamm was screaming “POWWWW!!!” all the way to the bank when he released the famous Hammer X driver.
Jack Hamm supposedly has hit a golf ball a 1/4 mile, has a club head speed of 162 mph, holds 6-World Records and is the father of the big headed driver. Quite a resume. We should add genius marketer to the list. His commercials which boasted “revolutionary” technology like a sword-shaped shaft, a “Zero CC” design and many others promised golfers what they all were so desperate to hear. Distance and lots of it. The Hammer X driver promised to add a whopping 50 yards on all your tee shots. Damn. Could it be true? I have to buy it to see.
What sounds like a joke now, actually sold a lot of drivers. So many that Jack launched product after product in the dark hours between 1AM-4AM on a golf channel near you. Hell, I am willing to bet many of you reading this right now still have one sitting in the garage as a reminder what not to do at 4 AM with a gallon of Rocky Road and a cold one in your lap.
So, of course we did everything in our power to track this guy down. The only intel we could get is that he has apparently gone full covert recluse status, but is still in Denver.
That didn’t stop us though, we decided to put the club to the test once and for all.
INFOMERCIAL:
If you need a refresher on just what the Hammer X can do for your game, have a look below:
ZERO CC’s?
We’ve all seen the gimmicky infomercials – some catchy music, an aggressively upbeat guy with a visor and haircut straight from the 70’s making a TON of unrealistic claims.
It’s about time someone took this driver and put it to the test. If I can add 50 yards to my tee shot for only $100, that new Callaway Epic I just got fit for is going straight back to the store.
HOW WE TESTED
- Two drivers were tested head to head to head (2016 Taylormade M1 and The Hammer X).
- Both were tested at 10.5° (M1 weights in the neutral position).
- Seven golfers with handicaps ranging from 0-15 and driver swing speeds between 90 and 115 mph participated in this test.
- Each tester hit 12-14 shots for each club from every set (frequently rotating between clubs).
- Gross mishits were eliminated and are not included in the shot counts.
- Remaining outliers were identified using Median Absolute Deviation (both distance and offline), and dropped before calculation of the final averages.
- All testers hit Bridgestone B330-RX Golf Balls.
- Ball Data was recorded using a Foresight GC2 Launch Monitor.
THE DATA
TaylorMade M1 2016
|
Distance
|
246.3 yds |
|
Accuracy
|
19.54 yds |
|
Spin
|
2768 rpm |
|
Launch
|
16.38 deg |
|
Ball Speed
|
141.48 mph |
Shop & Support
When you shop online consider using our special link. It helps support this site and other golfers around the world. #ConsumerFirst
Hammer X
|
Distance
|
221.02 yds |
|
Accuracy
|
23.78 yds |
|
Spin
|
2219 rpm |
|
Launch
|
16.97 deg |
|
Ball Speed
|
130.13 mph |
Shop & Support
When you shop online consider using our special link. It helps support this site and other golfers around the world. #ConsumerFirst
CRACKING THE CLAIM
I’m going to be brutally honest – I’m surprised the Hammer X traveled on average over 220 yards. With a E8.6 SwingWeight measured on the Auditor Digital Swing Weight Scale, it feels like you’re swinging a 46-inch pitching wedge.
While it does make a cool “whoosh” sound through the hitting area, the 2016 Taylormade M1 bested the Hammer in almost every category:
- The2016 Taylormade M1 launched over 10 MPH Faster than the Hammer. So much for the Power Core.
- The increased ball speed from the M1 led to an average carry advantage of over 25 Yards Longer over The Hammer.
- Spin rates on the Hammer X were marginally lower than the M1, and the data suggests roll distances do not vary dramatically.
- It is interesting the note the average clubhead speed for the Hammer X was a full 5 MPH slower on average. The sword-shaped shaft fails to cut through the air with greater efficiency.
Hammer X vs M1 2016
| Club | Ball Speed | Launch | Spin | Peak Height | Offline | Carry | Total Yards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TaylorMade M1 2016 | 141.48 | 16.38 | 2768 | 37.3 | 19.54 | 233.00 | 246.30 |
| Hammer X | 130.13 | 16.97 | 2219 | 29.7 | 23.78 | 207.35 | 221.02 |
FOR REAL OR PHONY?
The data speaks for itself.
Not only did the Hammer X fail to live up to a single claim made in the infomercial, it actually performed significantly worse than a mainstream competitor.
With clubhead speed, ball speed, carry…hell, every launch parameter being measurably worse than the M1, it goes without saying that your $100 is at least $95 more than you should spend on the Hammer X.
Stay up to date with all the innovations in golf by connecting with GolfSpy including reading our Product Reviews! Read up to improve your game! You can also read about other drivers that do improve your game. Read about the best Low Swing Speeds, Mid Swing Speeds, or High Swing Speeds drivers of 2020 to stay right on the cutting edge of golf technology.
John Grennon
2 years agoI have had a Hammer Driver 3 wood, putter, and sand wedges for the last 5 years They are great clubs. My best success has been my ability as a 65 year old golfer to hit a 3 wood 200 plus yards on the fairway and a putter I could aim the longest puts straight. I play pretty well all the other clubs.
freew3.org
2 years agoHello to every body, it’s my first pay a visit of this web site;
this webpage consists of remarkable and really fine material designed for visitors. https://www.freew3.org/
website
2 years agoHurrah, that’s what I was seeking for, what a material!
present here at this web site, thanks admin of this site.
golferDav
2 years agoJack Hamm contact info:. Longball Company| Englewood Colorado 3940 west nassau circle | 18002496999
Frank L.
2 years agoThe Hammer Club is GARBAGE!! The commercial is as phony as it gets…DO NOT BUY THIS CLUB
Frank Pusatier
1 year agoI bought the Hammer driver and I can honestly say it took 20-30 yards OFF my drives. It is a pure piece of junk.
Richard Tooker
3 years agoI purchased the hammer x and paid the freight to Australia
I have tried everything to get it to work so have my golfing partners
As far as I am con concerned it is a piece of junk
As one of your reviews sad it is like wracking your club into a piece of concrete
Just rubbish and all the good reviews must have been written by family members of the designer
Very disappointed and I wish I lived in the usa so I could return it and get my money back
I wouldn’t waste any more money sending it back
I got conned and I suppose if it was so good then why are there no professional golfers using it
Very disappointed
WILLIAM DYER
3 years agoif you lived in the USA they charge a $29.95 for returning the club plus a $25 restocking fee. Better off selling it on EBay or something similar. Total junk, and false advertising.
Craig C
3 years agoThree things that debunk the Hammer driver.
1. If the 50 yard increase was real, you would see tour professionals using this club. 50 yards to some means the difference between the PGA tour vs the Web.com tour. There are no tour pros using this club.
2. If the clubs claim were valid, you would see the major manufacturers of clubs copying said design.Only other hack clubs even look close to the hammer.
3. Since no other club promises a 50 yard increase. My suspicion is the hammer may not pass USGA standards for clubs. That may be why the club is only available from Mr. Hammers website, and not through any golf shop or USGA member club.
As the old adage says, if it’s too good to be true…
JBullets
3 years agoI used to work in the golf industry and demo’d The Hammer driver at our office driving range. My handicap is in the 6-9 range depending on how well I’m playing so I’m a decent ball striker with a driver swingspeed in the low 100’s. This club is trash. I spent a lot of time at that range and knew where my typical carries would land, and this club had to be 25 yards shorter than the OLD Taylormade I had in the bag at the time (I was still playing a R7 and this would have been in ~2012).
Rick Borne
3 years agoI received my driver yesterday
I’m not happy with it
I hit my R11 probably 100 yds farther
What do I need to do to return it
My phone is 412 302 1857
Kevin Duffy
2 years agoRick-you need to yell ‘pow’ on your downswing for added distance.
Mark Johnson
3 years agoI just bought the Hammer 500X. I used it this morning on the driving range for the first time. I hit 50 drives. Normally, I hit 20/50 fairways. This morning, using the Hammer, I hit 42/50 fairway shots, right down the middle. I normally hit 225-275 yards, when I hit the fairway. Today, I hit the same distance as I did with the old driver, but, because I was straight down the middle with my drives, I’m sure that it will mean 5-10 less strokes when I play an actual round. I’m very happy with it!
Christian Ericksen
4 years agoThe claims of the Hammer driver are fake, and I’ve never even hit one the clubs. The claims are fake because 1) if the claims made were valid, every other golf club maker would get one, reverse engineer it, and you would see copies based on that design. Look at the current crop of drivers on the market, and most have the same features and design concepts. 2) Again, if the claims were true, and amateurs are seeing 40+ yards in distance with a straighter shot, wouldn’t pros want that club. (Imagine a web.com player adding 40+ yards to his drive, might make the PGA tour) 3) with every club, the manufacturer must submit the club to USGA to be approved for use. And the USGA has a firm stance that consistent, well-struck golf shots will be the result of a players skill and ability, not by an advantage from equipment.
Mike boatright
4 years agoI’m no so sure that the hammer x wasn’t on the right track actually it was probably just built with a junk shaft and poor metallurgy. Recently I hit my Titleist 1989 persimmon driver 280 yards on flat ground tee shot no wind with a brand new callaway soft with a graphene core so it’s a modern ball. Ok I swung hard it’s a 43 inch steel DG gold 120+ gram shaft and I am strong however it’s shorter so It was limited. I estimate 108 mph club head speed the ball went high was pured on the millimeter and was the best shot I have hit in 10 years. The thing is I hit the driver 250-260 all the time it’s heavy and grooves my swing and because it’s a solid mass object when you hit it about right it goes deep. To me titanium is just ting it has a lot of mass goes all over the place in direction and when you happen to add 112+ mph speed and hit it right you get 300 yard crushed sometimes other times it’s just wild toe hooks and pop ups it’s actually not very forgiving. Persimmon has less ball speed or ”cor” by nature it’s wood and ceramic inserts yet it seems to go as far or just 12 yards shorter on average than titanium without the added benefit of a 45 inch 65 gram shaft explain this? Imagine a modern more dense material with the limit on ”COR” with a 45 inch 65 gram shaft swinging it 116-mph the whole face would be the hot zone and at 240 cc it wouldn’t pop up,hook and thin hits would;d be low burners all with the same ball speed.
Paul H
4 years agoI love how “Rob”, “Tony” and “George” are actually John Hamm making comments on this review.
NMBob
5 years agoSo, the shaft is illegal because it is not designed to bend the same in any direction around its circumference.
“At any point along its length, the shaft must:
(i) bend in such a way that the deflection is the same regardless of how the shaft is rotated about its longitudinal axis; and”
And the head is also illegal as it has a hole(s) in it.
“However, features which are deemed to be in breach of this requirement and are therefore not permitted include, but are not limited to:
(i) All Clubs
holes through the face;
holes through the head (some exceptions may be made for putters and cavity back irons)”
George
5 years agoSo I decided to try this thing. I’ve seen Jack Hamm’s infomercials for 20 years now on the golf channel as im sure you all have… I figured I’d finally try it. For the price… why not. I took it out on the course without practicing first with it. Bad idea I could barley get it off the ground. I never really hot the sweet spot…
I was on the verge of sending it back. I called and they answered and basically told me the sweet spot is higher on the face due to inverted unique shape… So I had to tee the ball much higher over the face. I tried it at the range and it made a huge difference. It went further than my old driver so I decided to keep it. Not bad for $99. I’d try it to see if it suits your swing or not! I know some of my golf budds who cant hit the Hammer any better than their regular driver while some love it… Like any golf club, putter wedge etc …! So best thing you can do is try it for yourself!
Jeff
3 years agoBullshit.
chris b
5 years agoI’m glad to know that this was all crap!
Every time I see this infomercial I crack up though …. POW!
OTT Golfer
5 years agoNo crown and no ball skid marks!!! Of course the inverted club face helps too.
J.B.
5 years agoThe Hammer X was a real thing? I thought that YouTube clip was a lampoon of golf infomercials. Hilarious!
dang3rtown
5 years agoJust did some Jack Hamm research, aka, hammsearch.
First, LA Times article from 97′ http://articles.latimes.com/1997/sep/28/sports/sp-37036
But, the real gem is his twitter page which may be both the best and worst twitter account I have ever read. It’s a like the Iron Sheik was a long drive douchebag.
@JackHammerHamm
Matthew Person
5 years agoLove it. I think Phil playing the Hammer X this weekend.
Tony
5 years agoI had the same issue I bought this driver online (the new 2017 version) and it actually lost distance at first! I called the company they asked me how high i was teeing it up. I said I tee it up as high as I would any driver… moderate… They said in order for this driver to work due to the inverted face you need to tee it over the face by at least an inch… the higher the better! I did that. It actually worked it went 15 yards further than my Callaway epic! It instantly felt more solid! Kind of stupid if you ask me that you have to tee it so high but hey it worked. Its no doubt the longest driver ive ever hit. When I used it as it was intended!
Michael Leung
5 years agoI’ve waited so long for this review.
Rob
5 years agoIt worked for me. Key is you have to tee it higher than normal because of the inverted face. When I tee it the same height s my taylormade it went no where. When I teed it an inch over the head it went 50 yards further than my Taylormade! You have to use the tool properly for it to work. Hope that helps!
Jason Williams
5 years agoJack Hamm isn’t in hiding. He changed his name and now owns PXG.
POWWWW!!!!
Liam Garrett
5 years agoTrue story….I literally found one broke in half in a trash can at the golf course.
Have to admit I did take it a put a shaft in it and yes I did scream boom when I hit it!!!
Sean Supple
5 years agoHaha… In the wise words of TK, I did NOT see that one coming! Who’d have thought this golf club was a total piece of garbage?!
Alex Christiansen
5 years agoGood write up. i’m sending it to my Dad, since I was just making fun of him when I found one of these in his garage. Just wondering, why do you choose the Bridgestone balls for your testing? (over any others?)
John Christiansen
5 years agoThat is not the same hammer I have. Mine is a solid black head and oblong shaft. You got 4.5 red tees and I didn’t hit it very well. But my wise ass son Alex, criticized me for buying it. I’m 70 yo and have bought 3 full sets of clubs in my life. Alex is 41 and buys multiple sets of clubs every year. He has never played a full season with the same set of clubs and he’s going to criticize me?
Craig Connolly
5 years agoI found an original version for sale in the used bin at my local store…15 bucks…had to snap it up just to say I have one…lol. Yelling pow after each tee shot really does provide more distance too…fyi! Lol
Tom Thornbury
5 years agoIf Chuck Norris played golf he would use this driver
Alex T
5 years agoIf Chuck Norris played golf he wouldn’t use any driver. He hits his putter 600 yards. Into the wind.
Uhit
5 years agowonder if it is USGA conforming…
…and if it is, why was the back plate of the Triton a problem?
Jeff
3 years agoIt’s not, I dunno why no one mentioned it but it’s not. That’s why no one should get it, it’s an illegal club as well as inferior design.
Jimmy Ingram
5 years agoLast year our foursome let an elderly gentleman play through that had one of these. He ended up letting all four of us tee one up with it. I didn’t think it felt half bad. Hit it within 10 yards of my TM. Those infomercials were way over the top but fairly representative of tv marketing in that era. And don’t forget the predecessor to the Hammer X, the Air Hammer.
Zack Webb
5 years agoIt only took 16 years of changes in technology to out perform the hammer x!
Roy Skidmore
5 years agoShocking
MyGolf Spy
5 years agoWe are on it! “As Seen On TV”Reviews
Joe M Bracamonte
5 years agoHas Hank Haney or Michael Breed called to contest your results?
Jackie Santopietro
5 years agoHammer X Driver 10 Degree Right Handed Xtreme Xfactor Aerospeed Shaft 46″
$25.00
0 bids
$34.50
Buy It Now
View Details
Xtreme Xfactor Aerospeed Graphite Shaft. Hammer X Driver. Right Handed. 10 Degree. Winn Dri Tac Standard Grip in Very Good Condition.
Condition: Used
Time left: 1d 1h 26m
Item location: Florida
Sold by: sacman75 (8348)
FTWPhil
5 years agoRegripped lol
Chad Mardesen
5 years agoIf only the Hammer had vertical grooves.
cksurfdude
5 years agoLOL’ing!
Seriously…. Good one!!!
Dave Horton
5 years agoHamm is in seclusion because he is a conman! Advertisers think golfers are moron’s! And they are right! I have seen Bruce Fleisher tell everyone that the Q link necklace will make you a better golfer just by putting it around your neck! P Azinger said the same thing about a shirt he was selling.
Even the guy who wrote this ad, calls Hamn’s ad popular! It’s not POPULAR!!! I think Hamn pays for everyone! The club sucks and Hamn is a shister!!
Jeff
3 years agoIf that had been Donald Trump in those adds nobody would be the least bit surprised, or think it out of place or character. Man is president of the United States now. Just saying.
David Poimboeuf
5 years agopowwwwwwww!
Larry McIntire
5 years agoI tried one of Hamm’s drivers a year ago. When I hit a ball it felt like I was hitting a wall of cement. Terrible club. Interestingly , I returned the club — after months of telephone calls and badgering, I finally did get a refund.
Stu
4 years agoI purchased were there Hammer drivers but three months ago and have not been able to hit it like they claim. Obviously it’s a scam he does not live up to their expectations at all. I’ve been trying to call them for the last two weeks and have gotten no response whatsoever from them. I will see not a happy purchase at all for me. All I want is my money back and return the damn thing
Joel Spaans
5 years agoPOW!!!
John Duval
5 years agoYour test is flawed! It only works if you yell “BOOOOM!” When you hit it.
Harold W
5 years agoNow this guy I know well. Yes he was long off the tee. But he never entered any long drive contest at all.
Years ago he got into it with Bob Toski at the golf show. He was trying to cut Toski down in a very loud way. So all could hear.
I didn’t think Hamm made any club that was approved by the USGA.
He wanted a club that I designed, but could not make it right.
All of his clubs came from someone else.
The first club to come out he got from an older man(the guy that put Velcro on golf gloves) screwed him to wall and caused another fight at golf show. Much more
William Frogge
5 years agoDid you yell POWWW with each shot?
Tom Smith
5 years agoIf no one shouted ‘BOOM’ or ‘POW’ after each shot with the Hammer then it wasn’t a fair test..
Judd Golden
5 years agoNo surprise, an infomercial overpromises…BTW Jack is around, a friend just rented his house in Steamboat Springs Colorado Ben Manley
MyGolf Spy
5 years agoPlease put us in touch!
Marc
5 years agoA customer of mine bought the Hammer X and has spoken on a number of occasions directly to Jack. Even has his number lol
MyGolfSpy
5 years agoCan you put us in touch?
Tony V
5 years agoI sweat this guy was next to me at Tilden Park in Berkeley on Saturday…looked just like him. He made these weird deep breathing noises before he attacked the ball…but he was hitting a few off the net which would probably be a 260-265 carry. He wasn’t using the hammer though
Berniez40
5 years agoNEXT WEEK:
The Alien Wedge vs. Titleist Vokey
Chi Chi
5 years agoHa ha….I still have an Alien SW (not in the bag), and although it’s not very versatile, it has the widest box grooves of all-time! Spins the ball better than anything out there. And it’s the absolute BEST for soft, fluffy sand.
Frank
5 years agolol I got an orbit a clone of the alien sitting at home
Gordon
5 years agoI wrapped my Alien wedge around a tree more then a decade ago….
My buddy kept the head as souvenir for years! Hahaha
I also had an Alien driving iron 18* graphite shaft… that same friend played it for YEARS until it broke on a swing.
Derek
5 years agoChipped in from the bunker with the alien on the first day, so there’s that
Steve S
5 years agoI hit one of these my friend owned. My 2007 Burner went 20 yards farther, so the arguments about new tech are bunk along with the shaft argument. This thing was a scam from the get go. Luckily my buddy only paid $5 at a garage for his.
Rich
5 years agoThe golf informercial said golf magazine
Tested jack’s swing speed at 162
Is that correct?
Ball speed should be about 221
That’s 400+
But the average amateur swings 90 mph
Ball speed 130
221 distance is right
So are these claims false advertising?
Getting 50 yards more seems unlikely.
I was tested for s driver using flight scope
My swing speed tap out at 95-100(best)
Ball speed 130 -140
Result: 209 carry, 224 average
Hit one ball 250 total
Not so easy indoors
You feel you have to swing out of your shoes
Not the way golf is played
Swing easy , hit hard
Rich
Frogge
5 years agoDid you yell POWWW at impact? If not the test is not accurate.
Robert Dwyer
5 years agoOld P.T. Barnum strikes again, Yes my dear there is a sucker born every minute !
TopPakRAT
5 years agoThe Hammer has an unconditional return policy. It also has one of the highest consumer complaint numbers of any info commercial ever made. The BBB rating is an F. No wonder the HAMMER is hiding in the mountains of Colorado.
Swingie
5 years agoOK your claims here are bunk, this is the first time you guys have failed us in testing parameters.
You need to….no HAVE TO compare driver contemporaries from that Era, not brand new technology not available to sensei hammer and and his fleet of engineering techs.
Sorry just not fair. You also have to activate the power core screaming POW!!! To reach yardage claims, everyone knows that testing properly will yield best results.
It’s well know too that the major oems forced hamm to be on at those hours for fear of his revolutionary products and that 3 hour window wade all he was allowed to sell in (1am to 4am). Dam biased Golf industry.
Jack hamm and Chuck Norris had a driver contest that ended in a draw. Look it up
J-Full
5 years agoI totally agree that the testing parameters are biased. Not fair to compare 2016 tech to this old tech. I’m surprised and disappointed MGS didn’t consider this.
Mark Hill
5 years agoOnly a complete idiot, with absolutely ZERO understanding of physics, would have expected the results to have been any different.
Firstly there’s a reason why convertibles are slower than hard tops. Its called wind resistance.
Secondly, the Hammer would have tge trampoline effect of a concrete floor.
Thirdly, the shaft is the engine room and that ‘sword’ shaft is about as flexible as Frankenstein’s monster.
I could go on, but….
As they say, a fool and his money is soon parted…. especially an angler or golfer…. lol
Andy
5 years agoWould love to see you perform a comparative test of the
GX-7 X-Metal Golf Club
Mur
5 years agoI second that Andy, please MGS, test it for us.
Jackie Santopietro
5 years agoI just received the GX-7 X Metal for my Bday. Really waiting for 70 plus degrees to really test it but it is not a bad club. I pulled my 3/4 metal out of my bag and I replaced it with the GX-7. It does hit it nice and high and I can hit it off the deck albeit never fun off the spring mud. It seems to go a bit farther than my 3/4 metal and is easy enough to hit. If you struggle with your driver it may be worth a shot. The big bonus so far, about 15 yards longer than the 3/4 metal when my ball is sitting off the ground in the rough.
Doug Quagliaroli
5 years agoIt would be more current to test his new putter. The claims made in the infomercial are incredible.
mcavoy
5 years agoE8.6 Swingweight? Hahahahaha!
The Club Nut
5 years agothe “SLEDGE” Hammer.
Scott Romines
5 years agoyou only needed one golfer to perform this test, I call BS
Matthew Dawson
5 years agoBoooooooommmmmm!!!!!!!
Jimmy Ingram
5 years agoHe was busy retrieving his balatas from the other side of that mountain range.
Michael Hansen
5 years agoheheeheee
Jun Nakiri
5 years agowould changing the shaft male the swing weight similar to the modern drivers? I thought it was interesting that the spin rate was lower than M1. If Hammer driver can be swung faster….that is my question.
Jun Nakiri
5 years agoOK….Hammer head is too heavy is what I understand. How heavy is it actually? Heavy head can produce more energy. E=MC2 and that can mean linger drive. For a guy whoes hwad speed is 162 mph, the results might be different.
I thought the result was impressive. Well, it miserably failed to prove what it claims it can do.
Steve S
5 years agoE=mc squared huh? So you can swing this at the speed of light? Must have REALLY good fast twitch muscles.
Andrew Smith
5 years agoIt’s not a fair test unless the testers yelled after each drive like in the commercial….
Dave S
5 years agoGood review, but one issue…
The Hammer X came out sometime in 2012 or before (can’t find a precise date with a cursory google search)… to make this a fair test, you should have used the top driver from the year it was released. Just like we’d expect the M1 to best the R11, we’d expect most 2016 clubs to best 2012 clubs. I’m sure the Hammer X would still lose, but this fight was fixed from the start.
MyGolfSpy
5 years agoIf a driver can hit it over mountains and go 473 yards it should be able to beat a driver from 2097.
Mat Davis
5 years agoThis is the funniest MGS reply ever
Yohan
5 years agoEveryone knows mountains will be mile hills by 2097 thanks to the mole people uprising of 2041.
Dan Mann
5 years agoYou are internetz champion of day with comment
Swingie
5 years agoOK. This reply is simple and succinctly accurate. Unfortunately you are correct, if it can hit over a mountain it technically was light years ahead of its time, re-validating this test. As many testers and myself have noted tho, if boom or pow! Were not loudly exclaimed during hitting test is still intrinsically flawed.
Dave S
5 years agoLMFAO! I submit.