Inesis Golf and The Concept of “Fair” Pricing
News

Inesis Golf and The Concept of “Fair” Pricing

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Inesis Golf and The Concept of “Fair” Pricing

Key Takeaways

  • Inesis—the golf brand of sporting goods giant Decathlon—wants to define “fair” pricing for the golfer.
  • The company says its Tour 900 urethane golf ball costs the same to produce as the ProV1, TP5 and others.
  • At $29.99 per dozen, the price difference comes from streamlined production and eliminating “useless” costs.

Inesis Golf isn’t the first company to offer the concept of “fair” pricing and it won’t be the last. But it is one of the few companies in golf that will tell you exactly what it means by fair pricing and how it gets there.

In 2021, that might be as transparent as you can get.

Inesis, as you’ve read on these pages before, is the golf-specific brand of $12-billion sporting goods giant Decathlon. Based in France, Decathlon has built a unique operation that’s as vertically integrated as a company can get in this day and age.

Decathlon’s goal? “To make sure the pleasure and benefits of enjoying sports are sustainable and accessible for as many people as possible.”

Whether it’s a Tour-level golf ball at $30 per dozen, a laser rangefinder for less than $200 or a set of irons for less than $500, Inesis is all about accessible. And when Inesis says accessible, it means affordable. It does not, however, mean cheap.

So what does “fair” pricing really mean? Where does it come from and is it an idea that resonates with golfers? That’s what we’re here to explore.

Price Makes a Statement

That, my friends, is a fundamental truth. A high price makes a positive, salutary statement while a low price tends to make a negative, derogatory statement. Yet, even within that fundamental truth, there’s plenty of conflict.

Yes, everyone “loves a bargain.” But don’t you also “get what you pay for”? While we’re neck-deep in clichès, isn’t it also said a fool and his money are soon parted; that you can be penny-wise and pound-foolish?

The marketing machine is of no help when it comes to resolving this conundrum. Whether it’s the result of a lifetime of advertising-fueled conditioning or just simple economics, it’s very difficult for the brain to believe that something of a significantly lower price can possibly have equal-to or greater-than performance. For most of us, even close-enough performance simply does not compute.

So, what makes Inesis think it can pull this off?

Two things: transparency and validation.

When it comes to transparency, Inesis Golf isn’t about to give you a detailed Cost of Goods Sold breakdown. But it will tell you the cost to produce its Tour 900 golf ball is about the same as the cost to produce a ProV1, TP5 or Tour B X. However, you can buy the Tour 900 for $29.99 per dozen. The others, well, you can’t.  So why the big difference in selling price? Inesis says you can find it filed under useless.

Inesis Golf: Useful Versus Useless

The Decathlon/Inesis Golf corporate mantra is to focus on the useful and skip the useless. Useful is a well-designed, aesthetically pleasing product that meets a golfer’s needs and performs with the best. Useless is pretty much everything else.

When Inesis says, “We don’t want to make you pay for anything that won’t benefit your game,” what specifically are they talking about? Advertising, marketing and packaging, for three. Make no mistake, those three items help move products at retail but none of them helps you stick a 5-iron close from 185 yards out.

Just how much of the ProV1’s $49.99 price tag goes to support Tour sponsorship is up for discussion but it might not be as much as you think. Remember, Cost of Goods Sold is what it costs to actually make golf balls. Marketing costs (including Tour support), sales and office support expenses, shipping, receiving, accounting, other corporate overhead, backend deals and profit are all wrapped up in the wholesale price. That’s what Titleist charges DICK’S, PGA TOUR SuperStore and others. The retailer then wets its beak by selling at the MSRP.

With Inesis, there’s only one beak to wet. You can call it direct-to-consumer or you can call it cutting out the middleman. Essentially, you’re buying at wholesale prices. And, yes, even though Decathlon sells via its own website (and a couple of Northern California retail locations), you can buy Inesis from Walmart online. If you look closely though, you’ll see the products are “sold and shipped by Decathlon USA LLC.” Walmart obviously gets a commission but never actually owns or touches the products.

Even the Box Matters

When it comes to useless, there may be nothing more useless, in the Inesis definition at least, than the box golf balls come in. Or should we say boxes.

Yes, packaging is part of the, uh, package. But packaging is all about shelf appeal. And shelf appeal really only matters when a product is on an actual shelf at retail, vying for your attention alongside dozens of competitors. So yeah, shelf appeal is important but golf ball packaging, while traditional, borders on the silly. Three balls go into a small box and then four of those small boxes go into a bigger box. The OEM puts considerable effort into making the box look shiny and cool so you’ll buy it. And when you buy it, you wind up throwing five total boxes away.

“We want an attractive ball but we don’t need it to be a masterpiece,” says Inesis Golf in its literature. Golf balls are, after all consumable; you’re going to lose them. Inesis takes the same practical and utilitarian approach with its packaging. The packaging is still traditional, with four small boxes inside one larger box, but it’s also minimalist. You’ll see the requisite imagery along with features and benefits but Inesis won’t be hiring a team of graphic designers to come up with an art museum-level package trimmed with a metallic lilt.

Retail’s Golden Handcuffs

Why, you may ask, can’t Titleist, TaylorMade or Bridgestone simply sell balls on their own websites at wholesale prices? The answer to that should be obvious but in case it isn’t, here goes.

When you rely on retail distribution (green grass, big box and online) for nearly all your sales, those retailers are, in a sense, your business partners. And Rule #1 in the Smart Business Handbook says don’t stab your business partners in the back. That said, you can certainly buy a dozen Tour B X balls on Bridgestone’s website but you won’t find them underselling their retail partners.

And while the combo of COVID-19 and the worldwide web has many doom ‘n’ gloomers predicting the death of brick-and-mortar retail, the retail concept isn’t going anywhere. And the reason is simple. It remains a fast, easy, efficient and inexpensive way to move mass amounts of merchandise from the manufacturer to the people who will use it.

Without retail, Callaway or TaylorMade would have to set up their own network of retail outlets nationwide. And while it may sound like fun, crossing town to demo the latest from TaylorMade, Callaway, COBRA and PING at their own outlet stores might be more effort than golfers are willing to exert. And when you add in the expense of leasing, staffing and stocking those stores, the price to the consumer would probably wind up being higher.

While Decathlon’s U.S. retail network is still in its infancy, the company’s vertical integration works to its advantage. Since Decathlon is a sporting goods supplier, its retail outlets carry all its equipment. You want a bike, they have bikes. You want backpacks or sleeping bags? They have those, too.

Yoga mats? Yep.

Inesis Golf equipment is simply one aspect of the Decathlon retail footprint and another page on the website.

Inesis Golf: What IS a “Fair” Price?

Ultimately, fair, like beauty, is in the eyes of the beholder. In MyGolfSpy’s big golf ball test back in 2019, the Inesis Golf Tour 900 rated as a Very Good performer on par with the Bridgestone Tour B XS, the TaylorMade TP5/TP5X, the Srixon Z Star XV and the Snell MBT X. On a per-box basis, the Inesis is the lowest priced of the bunch, not taking Snell’s bulk pricing into account.

At $29.99 dozen in white, that certainly sounds fair, doesn’t it?

The challenge for Inesis, however, is that golfers are NOT price-buyers. We may think we are and we may act as though we are but we’re not. And the evidence is irrefutable.

Consider this: the Callaway Mavrik and TaylorMade SIM were 2020’s top-selling drivers. They were also among 2020’s most expensive drivers. The ProV1/AVX family more than doubled the sales of the Srixon Z Star family in 2020, even with a 33-percent higher selling price.

We may decry the ridiculousness of those prices but it doesn’t stop us from paying them.

As we said earlier, price does make a statement as to expected performance and quality. But as we also said, Inesis insists the cost to produce its Tour 900 ball is not much different than the cost to produce a ProV1. The nearly $20 difference in selling price comes from added costs Inesis considers “useless.”

Whether those costs truly are useless is ultimately up to you as a consumer.

 

For You

For You

Irons
Apr 24, 2024
PXG Irons: Model By Model
Putters
Apr 23, 2024
PING 2024 Putter Line Extension
News
Apr 23, 2024
Nelly Korda Deserves Her Caitlin Clark Moment, So Why Isn’t She Getting It?
John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

John is an aging, yet avid golfer, writer, 6-point-something handicapper living back home in New England after a 22-year exile in Minnesota. He loves telling stories, writing about golf and golf travel, and enjoys classic golf equipment. “The only thing a golfer needs is more daylight.” - BenHogan

John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

John Barba





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Bobtrumpet

      3 years ago

      Any plans to run these through the Ball Lab?

      Reply

      Drew

      3 years ago

      The problem is Inesis is always out of stock and don’t even restock in some cases. Case in point, wI as looking at some rain gear since sping 2020 and they never restocked certain sizes.

      Reply

      Michael

      3 years ago

      Really agree with you, I have been trying to get a pair of their shoes in my size since they came up in the most wanted. They have not been available in my size in Australia in the last 2 years. Ridiculous!!

      Reply

      Steve C

      3 years ago

      We’re always told “get fitted” for the best results. Are these clubs “one size only” or can you order various lengths, lies, flexes? Only other concern would be quality control.

      Reply

      Alex

      3 years ago

      I’d be interested to have a compare/contrast with Tommy Armour (Dick’s housebrand). The Atomic woods and the 845s (driver and irons) seem to do very well at a much lower cost than the big boys– especially on a Flash Sale. . For an “off the rack” type club, they are perfectly fine (I keep a set of TA’s when I visiting my mom at her home on the east coast). Inesis and Tommy Armour seem to be good clubs for the golfer who plays once a month or folks on a budget who play more often. It will be interesting if Costco gets into the full bag of clubs too.

      Reply

      Andrew

      3 years ago

      I can say for sure their golf shoes (men’s waterproof spikeless) and fantastic. I can anyone confirm if their tour ball is the same as the OG ksig?

      Reply

      Bob

      3 years ago

      I will buy the balls and give them equal space with the others. I hope someone I know buys the irons so I can at least hit them on the range.

      Reply

      Mike Kelly

      3 years ago

      They’re not very accessible. I tried to look up a set of their irons and can’t even find where to buy them. They look great though

      Reply

      Michael

      3 years ago

      Don’t forget the huge amount of development costs that Titleist puts into as well as doing their own manufacturing.
      Why are Callaway balls cheaper? They subcontract manufacture. And don’t spend as much on research.
      I am sure the same applies to Inesis.
      My guess is they buy OEM balls and simply rebrand yhem3

      Reply

      Nick

      3 years ago

      Decathlon’s Tour 900 ball is not $29.99, but €29.99.. Depending on the EURO-USD rate, the cost in $$ would range roughly from $37-38 and some change.

      Reply

      bob

      3 years ago

      Yes, those ‘cheaper balls’ where they cut out all of the nonsense that adds costs are $39.99 in the US. That is not a deal obviously. The best deals are logo overruns, Srixon Z Stars when discounted or sold by the six pack. I would say Inesis is actually treading in a price range where they will get next to no traction in the US.

      Reply

      CrashTestDummy

      3 years ago

      I’m sure it is pretty good stuff and I would definitely try it out. However, as with all golf equipment, everything depends on the player’s preferences and whether they are able to get the performance they want out of the equipment. I have tried some of the most expensive equipment and didn’t like the performance for me, and tried many lower priced equipment that performed better.

      I do like that they are making the pricing lower. Lower pricing can be a good business strategy and sell a lot if product is good.

      Reply

      Steve S

      3 years ago

      I’m not sure that anything said here makes a difference. Well made clubs will give good results, no matter what the price. Last fall I bought a set of Acer irons, brand new, plastic still on them, for $85 plus shipping. They came out 2006-2007. I had the shafts pulled and replaced them with light weight graphite. I practiced at the range with them. I’m a 10 handicap. I played my last three rounds of the year with them. Shot 3 over, 4 over and 1 over. Then the weather turned to crap. My 3 best rounds of the year with irons that cost me very little. I can’t wait to play this year.

      Reply

      Kansas King

      3 years ago

      I’ve debated what this article presents many times and personally can’t justify spending big OEM retail pricing when clubs that perform equally well (at least 98% as well) cost less than half. One big issue I see in golf publications is that there is never a discussion that gives perspective to the performance gains on OEM equipment year over year. So, the new hot driver gives 0.21 strokes gained? What does that mean? At what handicap does a fraction of a stroke gained even matter? What is a truly meaningful strokes gained number for a given handicap?

      I know lots of people are willing to give up a portion of their life savings to claim that a launch monitor said that they will gain half a stroke every 18 holes even though their swing isn’t the same from one shot to the next. I’m not knocking the strokes gained metric as I think it’s core principle is sound, but I think it’s application has some flaws. I’m a five handicap and can tell you that 0.3 strokes gained with a driver isn’t going to make a difference over the course of a season for me. My swing isn’t the same throughout the year, so the swing I may have had on a launch monitor one day is May is not representative of my performance over the course of a year.

      In a world of CT limited golf equipment where there hasn’t been a significant new material introduced since the 90’s. Why pay huge sums of money for something that isn’t going to materially change your score? Sure, if you haven’t upgraded your driver for a decade, there may be some room to improve and your swing has probably changed. But even if you get fit for a new club, why pay double for a big OEM club where the difference may not be significant from the sub $300 option? Why spend an extra $1000 on a bag of clubs just to play once a week uncompetitively? If money isn’t a thing, get what you want but for the vast majority of golfers, saving a $1000 matters.

      In my opinion, if you’re not a competitive golfer and a $1000 matters, don’t buy the new shiny club on the rack. I recommend finding a customer club maker who can build a Hireko or Maltby set. Are you going to get equal performance getting a new $3000+ set with custom shafts? Actually maybe. I would be willing to wager that the average golfer (above 5 handicap) could not visually find a distinct performance difference without a launch monitor if they compared a high-end OEM set to a custom set on the course. The cost difference between a full custom fit OEM set vs.. a custom Maltby set is close to $2000 (assuming you use budget oriented shafts).

      I think this test would be highly intriguing to have a golf use two sets on the course for a few rounds, ask them which they thought performed better, then have them compare the sets in a launch monitor. Launch monitors will always show a difference but when does that difference matter? The strokes gained metric is great but sometimes you have to almost use metrology to decipher which club actually performed better in some MGS tests.

      Ultimately, real world performance and LM data will align at the end of the day when you aggregate all the data. But the biggest question is when is the difference big enough to impact an individual non-pro golfer and when does it justify spending 2x – 3x on equipment?

      Reply

      Bob

      3 years ago

      I seriously doubt the no affiliation comment.

      Reply

      Drew

      3 years ago

      Agree. You noticed that too.

      Reply

      John Barba

      3 years ago

      I think you guys might have missed something:

      http://mygolfspy.com/our-promise-to-you/

      Thilo

      3 years ago

      The question remains are the products equally good, so that the only variable is price (costs)? No, the proV1 is not identical to the Decathlon ball, so why discuss price in this length? And one thing that is always missing in all these articles (e.g. about sub70) is that usually you buy golf stuff when it is on sale, so you wait until winter is coming and then you can get even custom clubs, or printed balls, for the same price as the presumably cheaper competition. The competition is not RRP Titleist stuff versus RRP cheaper firm, it is actual price (in November, here in Europe) versus actual price cheaper competitor with usually much less or no discount. The cheaper firms are always losing that battle.

      Another very important aspect is the profit margin the cheaper companies have, which is often identical to the profit of the mainstream firms, meaning that they don’t spend money on marketing but taking that saving at least to a large part into their own pocket, not giving it to the customer via a cheaper price.

      One more thing: the big firms like Callaway also have cheaper mainstream product lines that match the lower prices of these competitors. And when these are even on sale they are in total cheaper than the supposed price competitor!

      Excuse my ranting but I just really don’t like this whole story line of #direct to consumer #nofrills #down-to-earth #equally good than the big firms but much cheaper #cut the middle man, it is just plain lie. I fell for that in the past until I realised that the big brands and retailers are no evil empires sucking out our blood for their own greedy profit but usually have the best products for the best price (end of the season). Companies like decathlon, sub70, Vice golf etc. make equally profits, and if not than because of lower economies of scale.

      The only real, I mean real price killer company I know of is Lidl, with their brand crivit. They have insane economies of scale because of the global number of markets, when they order balls or gloves from the chinese/taiwanese manufacturers their order is so huge that you as a customer really save money.

      I have no affiliation with any of the above mentioned companies, I just happen to know the financials behind some of the down market firms, because I know their cost overhead cost structure and the prices for which you can order stuff from the asian manufactures with your logo on it.

      Reply

      John Barba

      3 years ago

      Thanks for the lengthy and well-thought-out response, and thank you for reading the article. You make some interesting points, but I also think you’re making a few assumptions that you may wish to reconsider.

      First, in our own in-depth testing, we found the Inesis ball performed in the Very Good category, equal in performance to the balls mentioned in the article. The ProV, Bridgestone Tour B X and Srixon Z-STAR performed in the excellent category. So is the performance “the same” as the ProV? Not in our testing, but for a golfer on a budget, is the difference worth an extra $20 per dozen? As mentioned in the article, we as consumers are conditioned – we have a visceral reaction to anything that less expensive than the “standard.” It can’t possibly be as good.

      And I’m not sure it’s fair to state golfers “always” buy stuff when it’s on sale. Plenty buy drivers, irons, etc at full price and plenty will pay a premium on top of that for custom fit with upgrades shafts, grips, etc. If you happen to be out of balls come August, I don’t think a golfer is going to wait until his preferred balls are on sale in November to buy more. When you need it, you need it.

      And to me, it’s a sign that long-term marketing by major OEMs works wonders is when people say I’ll just wait till the end of the year to buy the (insert big name here) when it’s discounted, instead of buying a less expensive alternative. Again, the knee-jerk, visceral reaction is that the big name has to be better, and that the less expensive option can’t possibly be as good, or in the case of the Inesis ball, nearly as good. Marketing works, that’s why OEMs spend so much money on it.

      We’ll agree to disagree on this one. In many cases, the lower-prices stuff isn’t as good. In some cases it is, and and other cases it’s close enough, and it’s up to the educated consumer to decide for himself if there’s any perceivable difference that’s worth whatever extra money they may have to pay. The whole concept a lie? That’s utter nonsense – I’m sure some companies make claims that wind up being false, but that’s what we’re here for.

      Reply

      Thilo

      3 years ago

      Thanks for the reply, of course you are right in all your points. The big firms of course are marketing experts, my point was just that the product is usually also good, most of the times, not always. Thats what you are here to find out and I do rely on your testing quite a lot, all my latest golf buying decisions were either based on your test result completely, or if I found a great discount at least partly the MSG test results played a role.

      I think a price sensitive buyer tends to buy towards the end of the season or last season products, at least everything I have written is based on my experiences here in Europe (Germany and Finland). The normal retail prices here are substantially higher than in the US, because of the smaller market size, usually about 25% more expensive considering exchange rate and corrected for income levels. Thats why I was emphasising the price point so much, golf equipment is just too expensive here. Even very high income players (not me) are quite price sensitive here. I just got carried away in my comment because all golf brands produce in china, except for some higher priced putters and balls. And you can literally go to a Chinese manufacturer and order MSG irons that will perform very well considering their price, and then sell them with some cut the middleman anti-big firm story with good profit.

      Actual performance of course is player specific, your tests are the closest approximation to actual performance across many players that I know of. Keep up the good work!

      John Barba

      3 years ago

      If anyone reads these, please note this is how it’s supposed to work! Thank you for the polite discourse Thilo. You are a gentleman!

      Franz

      3 years ago

      As a side note, just to give a sense of perspectives, Decathlon net sales are around 12 to 15 bn euros annually. Callaway, the big and mighty barely reaches 1.2 bn dollars.
      So yeah, there’s certainly economy of scales, just not on the side you think Thilo.

      Reply

      HAC

      3 years ago

      It would be interesting to see tests of clubs from a producer like Inesis, etc., vs. clubs a couple of generations old by the major manufacturers that might sell at big box stores for comparable prices.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Irons
    Apr 24, 2024
    PXG Irons: Model By Model
    Putters
    Apr 23, 2024
    PING 2024 Putter Line Extension
    News
    Apr 23, 2024
    Nelly Korda Deserves Her Caitlin Clark Moment, So Why Isn’t She Getting It?
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.