Ball Lab: Callaway Supersoft (2023)
Golf Balls

Ball Lab: Callaway Supersoft (2023)

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Ball Lab: Callaway Supersoft (2023)

MyGolfSpy Ball Lab is where we quantify the quality and consistency of golf balls. Today, we’re reviewing the 2023 Callaway Supersoft. To learn more about our test process, click here.

About the Callaway Supersoft

What you need to know about the Callaway Supersoft is almost entirely in the name. It’s habitually among the softest balls on the market which likely explains why it’s one of the best-selling balls.

True story.

What golfers may not know and what’s relevant to this review is that the Callaway Supersoft isn’t produced in Chicopee, Mass., alongside the Chrome Soft family of golf balls. It’s produced for Callaway (the design is proprietary to Callaway) by Launch Technologies in Taiwan.

“LT” produces balls for several of the larger OEMs as well as numerous direct-to-consumer brands.

Callaway Supersoft golf balls

Callaway Supersoft Construction

The 2023 Callaway Supersoft is a two-piece ball with a 332-dimple ionomer cover. While it shares the same dimple count with other Callaway balls, the company adjusts dimple depth and geometry for each ball in its catalog.

Compression

A Callaway Supersoft golf ball in the MyGolfSpy compression gauge

On our gauge, the 2023 Callaway Supersoft has an average compression of 47. That’s a few points firmer than the 2021 model and nearly 10 points firmer than the 2019 model.

It’s effectively on par with the 2023 Wilson DUO.

While our numbers suggest it’s not as soft as it used to be, it remains one of the softest offerings on the market today.

Having said that, as we’ll discuss in the consistency section, the balls measured span a wide range, so our average is a bit more of a ballpark number than it typically is.

Compression Comparison Chart

We’ve had requests for a standalone compression comparison tool. As it turns out, that tool exists. We created it as part of our Golf Ball Compression FAQ page. At some point, we may merge the two charts but, for now, the plan is to include this chart in future Ball Labs.

Diameter and Weight

A callaway supersoft golf ball in the mygolfspy diameter gauge

All of the balls in our 2023 Callaway Supersoft sample were under the USGA maximum weight limit.

Six percent of the balls in the sample failed to meet our standard of roundness and were flagged as Bad.

Inspection

Centeredness and Concentricity

In the past, we’ve found issues with the concentricity of the Supersoft. As a two-piece model, that invariably manifests as a cover that’s thicker on one side than the other.

This time around, we found no significant layer concentricity issues.

Core Consistency

the core of a callaway supersoft golf ball

Core color was generally consistent across our 2023 Supersoft sample. We did find one ball with a noticeable chunk of non-standard material in the core but we did not flag it as Bad.

Cover

No notable cover defects were identified.

Callaway Supersoft – Consistency

In this section, we detail the consistency of the 2023 Callaway Supersoft. Our consistency metrics provide a measure of how similar the balls in our sample were to one another relative to all of the models we’ve tested to date.

a chart showing the ball-by-ball measurements of the Callaway Super soft golf ball.

Weight Consistency

  • Weight consistency for the Callaway Supersoft was within the Average range.
  • The third box was a bit heavier but not exceptionally so.

Diameter Consistency

  • Diameter consistency falls within the higher end of the Average range.
  • Box 2 was just a bit smaller on average.

Compression Consistency

  • Compression consistency is classified as Poor
  • The compression delta across the entire sample was 22 points, among the worst we’ve tested to date. As a result, not all balls are visible on the chart.
  • 9 balls were flagged as based on compression deviation.

True Price

True Price is how we quantify the quality of a golf ball. It's a projection of what you'd have to spend to ensure you get 12 good balls.

The True Price will always be equal to or greater than the retail price. The greater the difference between the retail price and the True Price, the more you should be concerned about the quality of the ball.

Summary

To learn more about our test process, how we define “Bad” balls and our True Price metric, check out our About MyGolfSpy Ball Lab page.

Callaway Supersoft (2023) Golf Ball Quality Summary

a closeup of a callaway supersoft golf ball

If you’ve followed Ball Lab closely, you know I don’t editorialize much in these reports but this is a case where some additional clarity is warranted.

The first thing that needs to be said is that these results strongly suggest that a line needs to be drawn between Callaway’s rapidly improving U.S. plant where Chrome Soft is made and Launch Technologies, the overseas factory that produces Supersoft and ERC Soft. With Callaway balls produced by the latter, there’s no claim of Precision Technology and our data suggests there’s a good reason for that.

On one hand, Supersoft costs $25 a dozen and, realistically, you shouldn’t expect the same quality as you would for $50. Couple that with the fact that the best balls we’ve tested from Launch Tech are average at best and, well, I suppose there’s a case to be made that Supersoft loosely meets expectations.

On the other hand, the consumer can’t be expected to know which factories produce what balls and, given that Supersoft is habitually among the top three to five best-selling balls on the market, it might be seen as a disappointment, especially if you’re a mid to fast swing speed player who plays Supersoft.

Callaway has a mantra that dates back to Ely Callaway: “Demonstrably Superior, Pleasingly Different.” Whether that’s a promise or simply an objective, Supersoft simply doesn’t hit the target.

The Good

  • Among the softest balls on the market (if that’s your thing)
  • Comparatively inexpensive

The Bad

  • Compression is all over the map (balls measured ranged from 38 to 60 compression).
  • Two balls in the sample weren’t round.

The Score

The True Price for the 2023 Callaway Supersoft is $35.99. That’s a 44-percent increase over the retail price of $24.99

At the time of testing, the 2023 Callaway Supersoft receives a Ball Lab score of 49. That’s the same score as the 2019 model.

Support Unbiased Testing.

DID YOU KNOW: If only 1% of MyGolfSpy readers donated $25, we would be able to become completely independent in 12-months. With every donation, you create change.

Would you be willing to help by giving a donation? Every dollar will help. Make a donation to support our independent and expert golf equipment research. A PayPal account is not required in order to donate.

Donate to MGS


Amount

Frequency

For You

For You

Callaway Quantum driver with a Tri=Force face Callaway Quantum driver with a Tri=Force face
Drivers
Jun 3, 2026
Does Callaway’s New Tri-Force Face Technology Really Work? What We Found Might Shock You
Labs
Jun 3, 2026
Callaway Chrome Tour (2026) Ball Lab
Instruction
Jun 3, 2026
Three Things Slow Swing Speed Golfers Should Look For In A New Driver
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Keith

      3 years ago

      Which is a better quality ball? The Callaway Super Soft or Taylor Made Soft Response? Keep in mind I’m 66 yrs old.

      Reply

      Keith

      3 years ago

      I’m 66 yrs old. Gave up the game years ago. Just started playing again. I’ve lost some clubhead speed. The Pro Shop recommended the Super Soft balls. I read your review and now I’m confused. I was playing Taylor Made Soft Response balls, 3 peice ball. Help did I make a bad buy?

      Reply

      John M.

      3 years ago

      I’m switching to this ball after today’s round. I truly appreciate all of your golf ball research, but after trying most of the major manufacturers’ “longest” and “best” balls for my mid swing speed over the past few months, it all boils down to feel for me. The longest balls were hard as rocks and the best balls spun too much. I’m a mid-handicapper and I’m not competing, so I don’t need pinpoint accuracy. I get that there was some delta with the compression, but without any data showing the distance differences between the lowest and highest compressions in the sample, we shouldn’t jump to the conclusion that the delta is significant.

      Reply

      Kevin

      3 years ago

      So, I’m a 62 yr old weekend golfer with a high handicap and I’ve been playing these for a few years now, and they feel “comfortable” for my swing and game. I have a slow to medium swing tempo and I don’t hit them as far these days. Are you saying that I’m losing a lot in my game by playing this ball? I thought a couple of years ago, you were recommending these for my age/ability level? I’m confused Tony…

      Reply

      bob

      3 years ago

      Didn’t Callaway get called out for really poor quality a couple years ago and they vowed to make improvements? Was that only for their top tier balls? This report seems pretty damning for Callaway across the board for their ball offerings. Makes you wonder if they get highlighted as making lower quality balls and claim to take the proper steps to address the problems but then do not improve their entire line up of balls where else are they willing to cut corners and hopefully not get caught?

      Reply

      Da Slammer

      3 years ago

      They don’t care too much about these cheap soft balls, because these are not the “performance” balls, they don’t fly and have no speed so they don’t need the precision lol

      Reply

      Nick

      2 years ago

      I don’t understand yall. In all podcasts , etc. You talk about the Kirkland ball being the worst ball you can ever buy. But it scores 89 and the super soft etc gets 49. How do you come up with that

      Jay Nichols

      3 years ago

      Bob,
      Did you read the article and see that Callaway doesn’t even make this model, they have Launchtech make them, so they obviously don’t care about the quality or the wide compression range leading to, who cares for this price, the players won’t notice, and clearly many people here want the best quality for the lowest price, and it doesn’t work with any product, I don’t know why players think that’s different with golf balls.

      Reply

      Tim

      3 years ago

      I love the true price aspect of the article as it confirms the quality of the ball we are purchasing but in the overall scheme of things, anyone who buys and plays 2 piece ball doesnt really care. They know they are buying cheap balls and probably do not care about the core missing a chunk. This is expected when you buy cheap balls.

      We need to see the left DOT in here. To me its the best ball ive ever played and i am hoping you guys test this against the database of balls you have.

      Reply

      Redrmbler

      3 years ago

      Agree. Recently, playing a round, I hit my prov1 into the woods. Found a shiny, super soft. It looked new, I don’t know what year, maybe 2023. I played six holes with it and was impressed with my driver hits. Seven iron was spot on 140 carries for me with adequate check, about 5 feet rollout. My 60 wedge seemed to like it, and the putting was soft. I did have to adjust putting to hit firmer as the ball doesn’t putt like a prov1. I was impressed and put the ball in my bags, saving special balls. I thought about buying some. I lose an average of 1-2 balls a round. I probably won’t buy it, as I have over a hundred new balls of various brands and types. But I would recommend this ball to a high handicapper. my gamer ball is Srixon qstar-tour latest version. Or if I am in a tournament struggling with driver-side spin brigestone e12 contact. E12 is long and straight. The downside is that it doesn’t check up great.

      Reply

      skeeter

      3 years ago

      the 12 contact is the longest ball off of the irons I have ever hit

      Da Slammer

      3 years ago

      Higher price for lower quality. Perfectly American in every way
      Lol

      Reply

      Daryl

      3 years ago

      Although I no longer play cheaper two piece balls it is great to see you guys occasionally test these!! Can’t wait to see the V3 Kirkland test… :)

      Reply

      John O

      3 years ago

      By far the most “found” ball on my local course. Nicest public course in the area.

      My wife uses them on water holes ……

      Reply

      Tim Gath

      3 years ago

      That’s why they make Chevys and Land Rovers. Price point and performance. For the most part, you get what you pay for.

      Reply

      Mike

      3 years ago

      Very comprehensive review. But to probably 98% of the folks that play this ball, the true price, even with imperfections, is still $24.99, as that’s oh that’s coming out of their pocket. I doubt many care about the imperfections. After pro v1’s, this is the most “found” ball on my course (high-end public).

      To me, the results are definitely disappointing, but you get what you pay for. I considering I’ve found a ton of these, they’re the perfect ball for my young child to start playing golf with.

      Reply

      Max

      3 years ago

      This review has turned me off from using these. I’ll use my money one some other ball.

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Callaway Quantum driver with a Tri=Force face Callaway Quantum driver with a Tri=Force face
    Drivers
    Jun 3, 2026
    Does Callaway’s New Tri-Force Face Technology Really Work? What We Found Might Shock You
    Labs
    Jun 3, 2026
    Callaway Chrome Tour (2026) Ball Lab
    Instruction
    Jun 3, 2026
    Three Things Slow Swing Speed Golfers Should Look For In A New Driver