Ball Lab:  Kirkland Performance+ V3
Golf Balls

Ball Lab: Kirkland Performance+ V3

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Ball Lab:  Kirkland Performance+ V3

MyGolfSpy Ball Lab is where we quantify the quality and consistency of golf balls. Today, we’re reviewing the 2023 Kirkland Performance+ V3. To learn more about our test process, click here.

About the Kirkland Performance+ V3

What better time than now to take a look at the newest ball from the Kirkland Signature Performance series as it comes on the heels of a new driver and new iron set released by Costco’s golf division in mid-December?

This ball is available in two-dozen, 24-count packages which may be appealing to those golfers playing courses with impenetrable jungles out-of-bounds and/or water hazards on every hole.

The Kirkland Signature ball can be classified as a mid-high launch, high-spin ball. We certainly experienced this during our 2023 Golf Ball test.

The Kirkland Performance+ V3 is produced in Vietnam in the SM Parker factory that makes the PXG Xtreme ball.

Key Takeaways

  • With an average compression of 93, the Kirkland Performance+ V3 is an option for golfers who prefer a firmer feel
  • At $17.50 per dozen, it offers an exceptionally budget-friendly alternative in the urethane space.

Kirkland Performance+ V3 Construction

While many may long for the return of a four-piece construction version, the wait will continue as the newest model is a three-piece design.

The Performance+ V3 is offered in a 338-dimple urethane cover.

Kirkland Performance+ V3 Compression

The 2018 and 2021 generations of the Kirkland Signature Performance+ line had an average compression of 86 and 91, respectively. The Performance+ V3 is a bit firmer than both with an average compression of 93.

Previous model balls with similar compression include the TaylorMade TP5 (2019)/TP5X (2021) as well as the VICE Pro Plus (2020).

The compression consistency across the sample was rated as “Poor” (see below) with a 15-point compression range across the sample, leading to eight percent being flagged as Bad.

Compression Chart

We’ve had requests for a standalone compression comparison tool. As it turns out, that tool exists. We created it as part of our Golf Ball Compression FAQ page. At some point, we may merge the two charts but, for now, the plan is to include this chart in future Ball Labs.

Diameter and Weight

Despite none of the balls in the sample falling under the USGA’s minimum diameter standard and all meeting our standard for roundness, size consistency across the sample was poor. Those inconsistencies will likely translate to inconsistent results on the course.

Furthermore, three percent of the Kirkland Performance+ V3 balls in our sample exceeded the USGA’s weight limit. Accordingly, they were flagged as Bad.

Kirkland Performance+ V3 – Inspection

Centeredness and Concentricity

No notable concentricity defects/off-center layers were detected across the three dozen tested.

Core Consistency

The core colors of the Kirkland Signature balls in our sample were consistent throughout the sample. No unmixed material/chunks were noted.

Cover

No cover defects were identified in our sample.

Kirkland Performance+ V3 – Consistency

In this section, we detail the consistency of the Kirkland Performance+ V3. Our consistency metrics measure how similar the balls in our sample were to one another relative to all of the models we’ve tested to date.

Weight Consistency

  • Weight consistency falls in the “Poor” range.
  • Box 1 was a bit heavier than average and Box 3 was quite variable relative to the average.

Diameter Consistency

  • The diameter consistency of the Performance+ V3 falls within the “Poor” range.
  • The diameter consistency was off enough that the chart y-axis had to be adjusted accordingly.

Compression Consistency

  • Due to the significant variability across the sample, compression falls within the “Poor” range.
  • Compression across the sample ranged from 88 to 103 with a compression delta of 15 points.

True Price

True Price is how we quantify the quality of a golf ball. It's a projection of what you'd have to spend to ensure you get 12 good balls.

The True Price will always be equal to or greater than the retail price. The greater the difference between the retail price and the True Price, the more you should be concerned about the quality of the ball.

Kirkland Performance+ V3 – Golf Ball Quality Summary

To learn more about our test process, how we define “Bad” balls and our True Price metric, check out our About MyGolfSpy Ball Lab page.

While this may be a value-based urethane ball, if you’re seeking the utmost in performance, you may want to look elsewhere. On the other hand, if you’re just out to have some fun and place a friendly wager with your foursome (and maybe play a full Kirkland bag), the price is hard to beat.

The Good

  • Significantly less expensive than nearly anything else with a urethane cover
  • No issues with concentricity

The Bad

  • Poor total compression/size consistency

The Score

The True Price for the Kirkland Performance+ V3 is $19.69. That’s a 13-percent increase over the retail price of $17.50 per dozen. Be mindful, however, that these are typically sold in the aforementioned two-dozen lots so you will have to pony up $35, thereby lowering the cost per dozen due to economies of scale.

At the time of testing, the Kirkland Performance+ V3 received a Ball Lab score of 45. That’s 29 points below the current database average and 43 points below its predecessor, the Costco Kirkland Performance + V2. While there are not a massive number of bad balls, there is just not much continuity from ball to ball. It is almost as if no two balls are the same and thereby potentially affecting your performance on the course.

See the Best Price!

Support Unbiased Testing.

DID YOU KNOW: If only 1% of MyGolfSpy readers donated $25, we would be able to become completely independent in 12-months. With every donation, you create change.

Would you be willing to help by giving a donation? Every dollar will help. Make a donation to support our independent and expert golf equipment research. A PayPal account is not required in order to donate.

Donate to MGS


Amount

Frequency

For You

For You

Uncategorized
Apr 29, 2025
Bingo Bango Bongo: A Fun Golf Format You Should Try
We Tried It
Apr 29, 2025
WTI: Hybrid Versus Lightweight Stand Bags – Caddy Daddy’s RevCore Bags Put To The Test
Deals
Apr 29, 2025
7 Performance Polos You’ll Want To Wear All Day
Robert Colella

Robert Colella

Robert Colella

Robert Colella

Robert Colella

Robert Colella

Ball Lab: 2024 Snell Prime 3.0
Aug 2, 2024 | 97 Comments
Ball Lab: 2024 Titleist AVX
May 5, 2024 | 12 Comments
Ball Lab: Callaway Chrome Tour 2024
Apr 26, 2024 | 21 Comments
Ball Lab: PXG Xtreme
Mar 18, 2024 | 6 Comments
Robert Colella

Robert Colella

Robert Colella

Robert Colella

Robert Colella

Robert Colella





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Sam Magnet

      4 months ago

      I’ve been playing the V3 balls for a while and they are fine for me. As a high handicapper my swing is wildly more inconsistent than the slight differences in balls that MGS finds. Nor have I found any issue with durability. I don’t lose nearly as many balls as I use to, but still generally lose them before they scuff up.

      Reply

      Sam Magnet

      4 months ago

      I happen to have 6 boxes or V3 balls and weighed all of them. Every one weighed between 45.6 and 45.8 grams inclusive. Maybe they got a bad batch but I think a retest is in order.

      Reply

      Michael Lenaghan

      1 year ago

      Why isn’t there a standard compression test for all manufacturers golf balls. It seems a con there isn’t..

      Reply

      John Webb

      1 year ago

      Titleist Pro V1 Left Dash doesn’t show up when filtering the charts.

      Reply

      Larry

      1 year ago

      You do know Taylormade bought the plant that made the first Kirkland ball right. That first Kirkland ball was based on a ball that plant made to sell with another name on it in the Asian market and was slimier to a Taylormade ball from the past. Non issue now. Taylormade also owns one of the other Asian ball plants that has in the past made many of your direct to consumer balls. The chances of a direct to consumer ball being on level with the Taylormade balls is getting harder if impossible to be made as sources are getting thinner and many are actually making a few dollars for Taylormade now.

      Reply

      Amounted Jones

      1 year ago

      The old Kirkland balls are better than the new v2, I play decent with just about any balls, upper 70s to low 80s, good enough to out do my buddies most of the time

      Reply

      Tim Evans

      1 year ago

      I tried V2 and they were really spinny. Great around the greens but sucked distance. I stopped playing them though because of wear issues The scuffed up after just a few holes. After reading this test however I will not be investing in the V3 for sure. Love Golf Spy!

      Reply

      Jay Nochols

      1 year ago

      It’s amazing how a board for comments turns into a place where people like Smogmonster tells us which companies spend X$ on Your Pros, X$ on Marketing, X$ on quality, and X$ on golf ball Research & Development, I’m 100% positive he doesn’t have a clue. I really wish Tony would correct that and remind people that Costco bought the leftover product from an OEM production run, it had nothing to do with raw materials, COVID, etc. the first Kirkland signature ball was closer to 10-12 years ago.

      Reply

      Jaime

      8 months ago

      So now I can blame my bad swings on a consumer friendly golf ball. Only in America 👍

      Reply

      Fran

      1 year ago

      I use kirkland golf balls. I believe them to be just fine for my swing speed and game. Won 1st place in league with the kirkland golf ball.

      Reply

      Dnelz

      1 year ago

      Good info, I really liked the 4 piece Kirkland and this article confirmed my suspicions that the new ball is inferior and feels hard as a rock to me. I have been playing the 2022 TP5X but looking at switching (back) to the Pro-V1X if it is around an 85 compression, that’s what I like and gives me the best results.

      Reply

      Willie T

      1 year ago

      Interesting read / as there is no Costco nearby, these balls won’t be on my to shop for list. The few KS “found” balls I have played did okay. Nothing to write home about – seems the original 4-piece set such a high bar that no version since can even come close. It reminds me of what I’ve heard in regards to crack cocaine addicts (dealt with it first hand with the ex- and her addiction post divorce) – the first high is the best high you’ll ever get, and any subsequent high is ever increased diminished returns….sounds like KS is on that diminished returns ride.

      Reply

      Gary

      1 year ago

      V3 suits my game. I’m a high handicapper usually 2-3 strokes on the greens. Distance is not a factor. Consistent yardage is. V3 is a short game ball with great spin. Won’t change.

      Reply

      Mike

      1 year ago

      From what I’ve read on MGS, the Kirkland balls spin too much for me, so I probably would not use them anyway. However, a 15 Delta difference in compression is huge to me, given that I have a moderate swing speed. One ball will feel like a rock & next will feel much softer. I don’t want that inconsistency.

      Reply

      Joemana

      1 year ago

      Pricing is off, these are $27.99/2 dozen in the store.

      Reply

      Bldrum

      1 year ago

      I have the yellow ones and they seem to scuff up badly after only a few hits. I feel my swing is pretty consistent and every ball i hit seems to fly differently, almost like they are not balanced well. I do not think i will be wasting my money on them anymore.

      Reply

      Smogmonster

      1 year ago

      If you look at the packaging the yellow balls are made in a different plant from a different country. China if I recall correctly. That stopped me from trying the yellow version.

      Sounds like the V3 isn’t worth it. I love the TM Tour Response. Ever since MGS published a very high score for those the price has sky rocketed. Oh well, you get what you pay for… usually.

      Reply

      Dtrain

      1 year ago

      In the end. You usually get what you pay for.

      Reply

      DuckHead

      1 year ago

      I use the Kirkland v3 for hitting into my practice net at home. They’re very poor quality golf balls. Cover durability is awful. They breakdown after a few wedge shots. Wouldn’t recommend gaming these. Hate to say it but they’re not worth the price.

      Reply

      Carl Weathers

      1 year ago

      The yellow balls perform MUCH different than the whites. The yellows have noticably less spin. I wish this site would review the yellow balls, they are the best kept secret in the game.

      Reply

      Bill

      1 year ago

      Yes PLEASE – they seem to be very different balls.

      Doug

      1 year ago

      If I’m reading this right, these differences might be a big deal for a pro but not an amateur. I’m an 18.4; what does a delta of 15 for compression mean for distance and consistency with a 9 iron? I play a wide range of balls (though I play K Sigs the most) and don’t notice giant differences between them. Am I correct in assuming these are a perfectly good option to go out and shoot a 93?

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      1 year ago

      Really simply it means that one ball is going to perform differently than the next. They’ll fly differently, spin differently, and ultimately travel different distances. I get that lots of golfers think it doesn’t matter or that they’re not good enough to tell the difference (whether you observe it or not, the differences are nonetheless real).

      It’s a bit like mixing different models into the same dozen (and lots of golfers play different balls over the same round) or a bit like if I randomly bent that 9-iron you mentioned a degree or two in either direction every time you pulled it out of the bag.

      All of that said … it’s less than $20 and at that price point, it’s a lot easier to do worse than better.

      Reply

      Brandon

      1 year ago

      Pick a club you hit, say, 150 yards on average. A 15-20 handicap usually has a pretty wide dispersion at 150. For this exercise, lets say as short as 140 and as long as 160. If the inconsistency of the golfballs you play can take off or add another 5 yards, it could increase your dispersion by another 50%. Definitely not going to help your cause.

      Reply

      Kevin C

      1 year ago

      That’s disappointing. I would have thought concentricity to be harder to hold than size and compression. If my game was only this inconsistent I would be ecstatic, but for my ball I guess I expect a bit better.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      1 year ago

      Compression can be surprisingly difficult to nail consistently. It requires precise mixing of the ingredients (depending on the level of automation, stuff can get spilled as it’s being added to the mixer), and if the raw materials aren’t stored properly (climate controlled environment) things can go to hell pretty quickly. Some lower-tier factories have been known to store their raw materials outdoors.

      Diameter issues can happen for a number of reasons as well.

      Reply

      Dave Guird

      1 year ago

      I knew the results were going to be bad. MGS is anti-Costco golf. What a sham.

      Reply

      Dennis

      10 months ago

      Precisely !

      Reply

      Jr

      1 year ago

      Test the yellow version. Differnt factory i heard

      Reply

      Roger

      1 year ago

      Yellow ball’s packaging (both large box for 2 dozen pack & small sleeve) indicate “MADE IN CHINA”.
      White ball’s packaging (both large box for 2 dozen pack & small sleeve) indicate “MADE IN VIET NAM)

      Reply

      Vito

      1 year ago

      Too bad. I was hoping they’d be better than last years version. Didn’t expect them to be that bad. Hate the variance between balls.

      Reply

      Jay Nichols

      1 year ago

      The only “good ball” Kirkland produced was the first version, the model they had to stop making & selling due to Acushnet Company (Titleist) lawsuit for patent infringement. Many people think Titleist products are overpriced, but there are large costs for top notch Research & Development, for the department associates, materials, and equipment to build & test the #1 ball in golf.

      Reply

      Smogmonster

      1 year ago

      The first version was discontinued because the raw ingredients purchased for production of Costco’s balls eventually ran out and couldn’t be replaced or sourced.

      Titleist pays insane money to tour pros and other endorsements. All factored into their price. Same for the other big golf companies. Yes, Titleist, TM and Callaway all pay good money for high production standards but others like Wilson and Maxfli do it too for a lot less.

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Uncategorized
    Apr 29, 2025
    Bingo Bango Bongo: A Fun Golf Format You Should Try
    We Tried It
    Apr 29, 2025
    WTI: Hybrid Versus Lightweight Stand Bags – Caddy Daddy’s RevCore Bags Put To The Test
    Deals
    Apr 29, 2025
    7 Performance Polos You’ll Want To Wear All Day