Ball Lab: 2022 Bridgestone TOUR B RXS Review
Golf Balls

Ball Lab: 2022 Bridgestone TOUR B RXS Review

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Ball Lab: 2022 Bridgestone TOUR B RXS Review

MyGolfSpy Ball Lab is where we quantify the quality and consistency of the golf balls on the market to help you find the best ball for your money. Today, we’re taking a look at the 2022 Bridgestone TOUR B RXS. To learn more about our test process, how we define “bad” balls, check out our About MyGolfSpy Ball Lab page.

About the Bridgestone TOUR B RXS

Like the Srixon Q-Star Tour we covered in our previous Ball Lab, the TOUR B RXS falls within what we call the “non-Tour urethane” category. It’s a ball marketed for slower swing speed golfers who often prefer a softer-feeling ball and who won’t pay much, if any, low-compression penalty off the tee. As with other low-compression offerings, you can expect relatively high flight with low spin.

Bridgestone TOUR B RXS Construction

The Bridgestone TOUR B RXS is a three-piece ball with a 338-dimple cover.

Our samples of the TOUR B RXS were manufactured at the Bridgestone’s ball factory in Covington, Ga.

Compression

A Bridgestone TOUR B RXS golf ball on a compression gauge

On our gauge, the Bridgestone TOUR B RXS has an average compression of 65. We classify that as a “medium firmness” offering. The TOUR B RXS isn’t nearly as soft as the softest two-piece offerings (Callaway SuperSoft, Wilson DUO, etc.). That said, it is the softest urethane-covered ball we’ve tested to date, significantly softer than a Pro V1, for example.

Diameter and Weight

Bridgestone TOUR B RXS golf balls on various diameter gauges

Category for category, Bridgestone balls tend to run a bit larger than the market average. We weren’t shocked to find that the TOUR B RXS qualifies as large relative to our database average. With that, none of the balls in the sample was under the USGA minimum size.

Also worth a mention, all of the sample met our standard for roundness.

While the Bridgestone TOUR B RXS is a bit heavier than our database average (and that can provide a small distance benefit) none of the balls we tested exceeded the USGA’s weight limit.

Inspection

Centeredness and Concentricity

Across the sample, we flagged only a single ball as bad for a concentricity issues. Specifically, the cover was appreciably thicker on one side of the ball than the other. Beyond that, we found nothing of any particular concern.

Core Consistency

the core of a bridgestone TOUR B RXS golf ball (2022 version)

Core consistency and color were largely consistent throughout the sample which is typical for Bridgestone.

Cover

No notable cover issues were found.

Bridgestone TOUR B RXS – Consistency

In this section, we detail the consistency of the 2022 Bridgestone TOUR B RXS. Our consistency metrics provide a measure of how similar the balls in our sample were to one another relative to all of the models we’ve tested to date.

A chart showing the consistency of the 2022 Bridgestone TOUR B RXS golf ball

Weight Consistency

  • Weight consistency for the Bridgestone TOUR B RXS.
  • Weight was reasonably consistent from box to box with the lightest balls being found in Box 1.

Diameter Consistency

  • Diameter consistency for the 2022 Bridgestone TOUR B RXS falls within the Average range.
  • The size of the balls runs large relative to our database average.

Compression Consistency

  • Compression consistency falls within the Average range.
  • Box 1 had the greatest variation with one ball being flagged as bad for being significantly softer than the sample average.
  • The compression delta across the entire sample was 11.8 which is a bit below average.
    • That’s largely the result of the bad ball in Box 1.

True Price

True Price is how we quantify the quality of a golf ball. It's a projection of what you'd have to spend to ensure you get 12 good balls.

The True Price will always be equal to or greater than the retail price. The greater the difference between the retail price and the True Price, the more you should be concerned about the quality of the ball.

Summary

To learn more about our test process, how we define “bad” balls and our True Price metric, check out our About MyGolfSpy Ball Lab page.

The 2022 Bridgestone TOUR RXS is a solid offering especially for those looking for the softest urethane ball they can find.

The Good

  • Solidly average across the board

The Bad

  • Two bad balls in the sample

At the time of review, the 2022 Bridgestone TOUR B RXS receives a Ball Lab score of 75. That’s a couple of ticks better than the database average (73) at the time of testing.

Support Unbiased Testing.

DID YOU KNOW: If only 1% of MyGolfSpy readers donated $25, we would be able to become completely independent in 12-months. With every donation, you create change.

Would you be willing to help by giving a donation? Every dollar will help. Make a donation to support our independent and expert golf equipment research. A PayPal account is not required in order to donate.

Donate to MGS


Amount

Frequency

For You

For You

News
Apr 25, 2024
Myrtle Beach Classic YouTube Qualifier Is An Interesting Concept That Doesn’t Quite Deliver
Golf Technology
Apr 25, 2024
Skillest is Reimagining Golf Instruction
Golf Bag Carts
Apr 25, 2024
Forum Member Review: Clicgear Model 4.0 Golf Push Cart
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Tim

      12 months ago

      You guys really need to reformat a ton of areas of this website……having all these ads pop up in the middle of scrolling is really annoying. It makes me want to NOT read any further. a little reformatting will go a long way…..that being sid, im shocked at the 6% bad ball #. I thought Bridgestone QA was one of the best in the business.

      Reply

      Phil Wi[[iams

      1 year ago

      This is a ball quality of materials and construction test. Ball performance is a whole different metric. Please remember the test is used to find the quality of the ball not the performance.

      Reply

      10shot

      1 year ago

      Yeah, Tiger Woods only uses crappy balls. So this tester, material or mechanical engineer?

      Reply

      Doug Hsnsen

      1 year ago

      Thanks for reinforcing my choice of ball for the last two seasons…… came of off the higher compression Callaway Chromesoft to this ball in 2021… I did notice that this B-RXS did not spin as readily on < 80 yard pitches and chips around the green.

      I returned the Tru-Vis CCS during a shipping hiatus from Bridgestone (Covid ca-ca).

      This year's offering seems to have solved that difference…. and the bottom line for short/straight hitting me….. "the softest urethane covered ball on the market"!

      Joila!!! Fait accompli!!

      Merci,

      -=Doug

      Reply

      Mike in Pittsburgh

      1 year ago

      I realize having people suggest other things you could do in your tests has to be tedious, but here goes… My experience with Bridgestone balls is they absolutely positively would not stop on the greens. I realize the softness of the cover may imply this, but it would be really good to know if they will stop when chipped onto a green. To me, that is the single largest omission I find in all of your ball tests.

      Reply

      WBN

      1 year ago

      Mike, I have been playing the BRX for years and have no problem stopping the ball on the green. The stopping distance varies depending which brand of irons I am using. The Mizuno seems to stop the ball the best. You might want to check your grooves for a tuneup.

      Reply

      Mike in Pittsburgh

      1 year ago

      I appreciate the response, but I routinely get Titleist, Maxfli TourX, and even Kirkland balls to stop dead. Only the Bridgestones seem to insist on rolling out like the old Top Flite Top Rocks. Perhaps this has changed, as I refused to play Bridgestones for several years because of this. Like I said in my comment, for me any useful ball review should include this information – and if Bridgestone has cracked the problem, great, I might try them again! Until then I will avoid them.

      David S

      1 year ago

      I bought a couple of dozens of these thinking these would be the balls for me. I absolutely hated them! They were like putting super balls. I couldn’t really feel them off the club face and just didn’t get along with them at all. I ended up returning the unused dozen and gave away the sleeves that I had left. Frankly, I’d rather play a Noodle and that’s saying something for me.

      Reply

      Mike

      1 year ago

      I’ve had good success with the RX version of this ball. Any comments on how the RXS might play differently. If the answer is a matter of giving me some more spin, OK, I can figure that out. But I figured you MGS folks might have some more insights. I realize it’s not the ball you guys play but there’s a ton of folks out there w/ swing speeds <95 MPH. So any thoughts on that subject would be appreciated.

      Reply

      Will

      1 year ago

      While these results are interesting they would be so much more helpful if tied to some simple performance tests. For example, hit the ball on an Iron Mike at three swing speeds, 85, 95, 105 and report the results. Without some tie to ball performance these tests are interesting but not really helpful, other than avoiding balls with significant problems..

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      1 year ago

      You can find robot test results here (http://mygolfspy.com/best-golf-balls-2021/). The thing to keep in mind is that if a ball is not consistent (Ball Lab) then the performance results are almost meaningless.

      FWIW – avoiding balls with significant problems is half the battle.

      Reply

      Kelly

      1 year ago

      Do you have a link re: “You can find robot test results here.” I’m not finding those results. Please & thank you.

      Art Williams

      1 year ago

      It’s hard for me to believe this is an unbiased review. Too many top pros play the Bridgestone balls for them to be scored in the 70s. Being a senior player I do prefer the RX and RXS balls over Titleist offerings though I give the AVX cusps over the ProVs for my game. I’ll say this Bridgestone has the best Chemical Emgineers in the business by far so get some unbiased test or next time.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      1 year ago

      As clearly stated in the article, the current database average is +/- 75. That is to say, we would expect a ball of average quality to score +/- 75.

      As it happens in statistics, a majority of things in a sample (in this case our golf ball database) will fall somewhere within the average range.

      Remembering how things were in grade school… We got As, Bs, Cs, Ds, and Fs (hopefully not many). If you’re not grading on a curve (and we don’t), a C-level score (a 75 for example) falls right in the middle of the range (kinda like an average).

      So, to reiterate, 75 is average (and there’s absolutely nothing wrong with average – and we expect most balls we test will fall within the average range).

      For reference, we currently have scores between 40 and 97 in our database. 75 (again, average) isn’t as bad as you seem to think.

      Reply

      10shot

      1 year ago

      totally agree OP, seems the only good ball on this website are Titleist. Tiger Woods wouldnt go near this ball.
      Are any of the Mygolf crew engineers

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    News
    Apr 25, 2024
    Myrtle Beach Classic YouTube Qualifier Is An Interesting Concept That Doesn’t Quite Deliver
    Golf Technology
    Apr 25, 2024
    Skillest is Reimagining Golf Instruction
    Golf Bag Carts
    Apr 25, 2024
    Forum Member Review: Clicgear Model 4.0 Golf Push Cart
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.