Will It Golf? Trail Running Shoe Versus Best Spikeless Golf Shoe
Spikeless Golf Shoes

Will It Golf? Trail Running Shoe Versus Best Spikeless Golf Shoe

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Will It Golf? Trail Running Shoe Versus Best Spikeless Golf Shoe

Do golf shoes actually help you play better? Like me, you’ve probably asked yourself that question. Or, like me, you’ve left your golf shoes at home and been forced to play a round in something not so suitable for the course.

You wouldn’t dare hit the course with a hockey stick instead of a putter, would you? There’s a lesson in there somewhere. Just because it looks like it might work for golf doesn’t mean that it will. More on that in a minute.

As any self-respecting journalist does, I read the comments about my work so I can try to do better. This year we had multiple readers share their experience with trail running shoes on the golf course and it rekindled a flame of curiosity that I’d had months ago.

Trail Running Shoes Versus Spikeless Golf Shoes

Are trail running shoes a suitable replacement for spikeless golf shoes? Are there any trade-offs? The fact that some of you choose not to wear a designated golf shoe in favor of something else is an interesting take that needs further exploring.

At first glance, it’s clear that, like spikeless golf shoes, trail running shoes use a host of rubber lugs to increase traction. If you compare 10 different trail running shoes to 10 spikeless golf shoes, you’ll surely find one or two with a more aggressive traction pattern than a shoe designed for golf.

If our rigorous golf shoe testing has taught me anything, it’s that not all (golf) shoes are created equal. A few of the spikeless golf shoes we tested this year hardly deserved the name. Some had subpar traction and others lacked stability.

Speaking of testing—it’s only right that we test the hypothesis. So, will it golf?

Let’s find out.

Testing Criteria

The test itself is simple. I took the best spikeless golf shoe of 2023, the adidas CodeChaos 22, and put it up against one of the most popular trail shoes out right now, the HOKA Speedgoat 5. Each shoe was put through a rigorous test to determine a winner.

For those who aren’t familiar with how we test, this is what to look for when choosing a spikeless golf shoe.

  • Comfort. Above all else, a spikeless golf shoe should be comfortable. If you can’t walk 18 or 36 holes right out of the box, then the shoe isn’t comfortable enough.
  • Stability. Golf is a game of inches and you can’t afford to give up distance or accuracy because your shoe is unstable. A stable spikeless golf shoe should keep you from rolling over or sliding over the footbed.
  • Traction. Both spikeless golf shoes and trail running shoes should provide enhanced traction, but is one better than the other? Good luck making a solid swing if your shoes won’t grip and allow you to use the ground.
  • Elements. You can’t control the weather but you can control your choice of golf footwear. A good spikeless golf shoe should be waterproof.

It’s important to note that, while I could have also tested a pair of spiked golf shoes, the test would be unfair to the trail running shoes. Because spikeless golf shoes and trail running shoes often share similarities in the sole, it was only right to compare them.

The Competitors

Round 1: Comfort

Can you golf in Hokas? We put them to the test.

Of the four testing criteria, comfort had the most predictable outcome. The HOKA Speedgoat 5 was the clear winner.

The CodeChaos 22 is a darned comfortable spikeless golf shoe but the HOKA Speedgoat 5’s pillowy midsole was a joy to walk in. It’s no knock on the CodeChaos 22, though, as the Speedgoat 5 was the heavy favorite going into Round 1.

Round 2: Stability

Despite a promising performance in the first round, Round 2 was not so favorable for the HOKA Speedgoat 5. If there’s one thing that really separates a trail running shoe from a shoe designed specifically for golf, it’s stability. The testing made it very clear that a trail running shoe such as the HOKA Speedgoat 5 isn’t meant to handle the twisting forces of the golf swing while the adidas CodeChaos 22 stayed strong and stable throughout.

If you don’t want to turn or roll your ankle, stick with a spikeless golf shoe. Most spikeless golf shoes have purposeful outriggers and rigid midsections in order to keep your foot contained and stop the shoe from twisting. These key design features promote stability that a trail shoe can’t match.

It’s noteworthy to mention that trail running shoes like the Hoka Speedgoat 5 aren’t necessarily unstable. There’s still a certain level of stability a shoe must have for rugged terrain. But running stability is very different from golf stability. A stable running shoe helps keep the foot in a neutral position while a stable golf shoe focuses more on caging and using the powerful downward and lateral movements of the lower body in the golf swing.

Round 3: Traction

Traction test of the Hoka Speedgoat and adidas CodeChaos 22

A quick glance at the bottom of both shoes offers a glimmer of hope for the Speedgoat 5. If anything, the rubber lugs seem like they’ll at least provide some grip. The traction test was admittedly the most competitive of the bunch but the adidas CodeChaos 22 emerged superior. Not that the Speedgoat 5 didn’t land a few punches. Its traction performed pretty darned well, all things considered.

You’ll notice that the CodeChaos 22 has far more traction lugs than the Hoka Speedgoat 5, which does make a difference.

The number of lugs isn’t the only thing that matters, though. Their shape and size matter nearly as much. The CodeChaos 22 features multiple shapes and sizes of lugs oriented in all different directions. As well, different portions of the sole feature varying lug designs. This provides complete coverage whether you’re moving left, right, up or down. The Speedgoat 5, on the other hand, has only one lug size and type.

Close up of traction on the adidas codechaos 22 and hoka speedgoat 5

The easiest way to picture the difference is to look at tire treads. Some tires feature symmetrical patterns (similar to the Speedgoat 5) and others feature asymmetrical patterns (like the Codechaos 22). Any guess as to which type of tire is best in slippery conditions?

While the symmetrical pattern on the Speedgoat 5 provides some traction, the high-performance asymmetrical pattern of the CodeChaos 22 provides better all-around grip. The Speedgoat 5 performed well in dry conditions but the minute moisture was introduced, its traction was compromised. The adidas Codechaos 22 held firm in both wet and dry conditions.

Round 4: Elements

Surprised the Hoka Speedgoat 5 lasted until Round 4? At this point, the fight is over. If there was a proverbial knockout blow, it was this category. The Speedgoat 5 features a mostly mesh upper with some TPU overlays near the toe for durability. That said, the shoe is far from waterproof or even water resistant, for that matter. Water permeates its mesh membrane with ease which means you’re stuck with wet socks for the entirety of your round.

The CodeChaos 22’s mesh body is encased in a plastic layer that makes it extremely water-resistant. Not only will the CodeChaos 22 keep your feet dry but the water-resistant TPU layer makes it easier to clean, too.

By Unanimous Decision

The adidas codechaos 22 is the best spikeless shoe for 2023 and it beat out the Hoka trail shoes.

If you haven’t pieced it together by now, here’s the verdict: the adidas CodeChaos 22 is a far superior option than the Hoka Speedgoat 5. This toe-to-toe bout made it very clear to me, as I hope it did you, that trail running shoes lack some of the key “ingredients” that make a golf shoe a golf shoe.

Are there trail running shoes out there that may perform better? I’m not sure. At this point, though, I’m willing to conclude that if you value stability, traction and a shoe that handles the elements … stick with a spikeless golf shoe.

If comfort is the only thing you need from a “golf shoe,” then you can probably get by with a trail running shoe like the Speedgoat 5. But as a product expert, I’d advise against it if your goal is to play your best.

For You

For You

Irons
Apr 24, 2024
PXG Irons: Model By Model
Putters
Apr 23, 2024
PING 2024 Putter Line Extension
News
Apr 23, 2024
Nelly Korda Deserves Her Caitlin Clark Moment, So Why Isn’t She Getting It?
Connor Lindeman

Connor Lindeman

Connor Lindeman

Connor is MyGolfSpy's resident sneakerhead who believes that golf is more enjoyable with a fresh pair of kicks. When he isn't scrolling Twitter to find his next golf shoe purchase, you can find him at the piano or trying a new dessert place with his wife. #Lefty

Connor Lindeman

Connor Lindeman

Connor Lindeman

Connor Lindeman

Connor Lindeman

Connor Lindeman

Connor Lindeman





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Tom Tee

      4 months ago

      Hoke introduced the Stinson 7 shoe late this year. I would highly recommend trying this as a golf shoe.. Hoka labels it a high stability and high comfort shoe built for terrain runs. If possible, can we get a comparison on the Hoka Stinson 7 vs a spike less golf shoe?

      Reply

      Steve D.

      6 months ago

      I’d like to try this around and ask if a spiked w/p golf shoe like New Balance 997 would make a good intermediate trail shoe with the spikes removed?

      I go for long winter trips to AZ and do both. Luggage space is at a premium when I fly. I’ve been using trail shoes for golf generally without issue but thinking to try the other way around this year.

      Reply

      Connor Lindeman

      6 months ago

      I’ve not tried that. However, removing the spikes probably opens the shoe up to getting rocks, dirt, etc stuck in the ports where the spikes are supposed to go. Plus, you’re going to want a shoe with tougher materials. More than likely, the rubber on the golf shoe will wear more quickly than a trail shoe that’s designed to take a beating.

      Reply

      Dave

      7 months ago

      The Code Chaos would also win for the ugliest shoe. I play just as well or better in tennis shoes and they are much more comfortable. I play with some guys that don’t even tie their laces. If you aren’t playing for a living, golf shoes will make no difference in your score.

      Reply

      Derrick

      11 months ago

      Unfortunately, I would never buy CodeChaos anything. I had a pair of the originals and the soles split in half in less than 6 months of weekend wear while using a cart. Adidas told me that was normal wear and tear and wouldn’t replace them.

      Reply

      Mike jones

      12 months ago

      I’d like to see a turf soccer shoe comparison

      Reply

      Michael

      1 year ago

      Just bought the on cloud cloud vista waterproof for golf. They are great. I’d suggest matching this shoe up to the adidas and see what the results are.

      Reply

      Mike

      1 year ago

      My course tends to play a bit “wet” so I stick w/ only spike shoes.

      Reply

      Clay Ogata

      1 year ago

      I had Achilles Surgery and had a long bout with an open wound.
      As a result, I was not able to have a shoe on my foot for over a year, so I started playing in Under Armour Slides and actually hit the ball more consistently solid because I wasn’t able to over-swing.
      No loss of distance, only issue was sand in my shoes when hitting out of bunkers, but easy to take a towel and brush them off.
      I still practice in them – I’d be interested to see the results of a test vs. slides…

      Reply

      Ajit Pillai

      1 year ago

      I use dedicated spiked and spikeless golf shoes, but I also use NIKE LaCrosse shoes that have an aggressive tread pattern. They work well.

      Reply

      John

      1 year ago

      I’ve gone the other way, wearing spikeless golf shoes for trail hiking. Last year I was heading out for a week of camping/hiking and didn’t have time to replace my hiking shoes (I tend to procrastinate just a little too long sometimes). So, I grabbed my golf shoes (Addidas) knowing that I could walk several miles comfortably in them and that they should have reasonable traction on the trail (and I figured the waterproofness would be handy too). They worked out great!

      Reply

      Tony P

      1 year ago

      Should have tried the On Trail Running shoes….They are more stable & have better waterproofing…Bottom line is if the shoes isn’t comfortable for walking, how more often will you have to buy new shoes and factor that into the cost.

      Reply

      Matthew

      1 year ago

      Yeah but the holes in the soles of the ON will fill up with all sorts of stuff are impossible to clean… I do agree a super padded shoe like the speedboat is a silly option. I would have gone with a solomon speed cross or something else without the pillow midsole. Also lots of trail runners have goretex liners, making them a better apples to apples comparison.

      Reply

      Jon

      1 year ago

      The hoka speedgiat 5 is offered in gore tex

      Don

      1 year ago

      I wonder how test results would change if you chose a cross trainer? I have worn cross trainers for 20 years to play golf.

      Reply

      Alan

      1 year ago

      Very interesting review. How expensive were the two shoes?

      Reply

      Ryan Van Culin

      1 year ago

      Seems odd to claim a waterproof shoe is better at waterproofing than a non-waterproof shoe.

      I use trail running shoes for caddying, and have therefore decided to golf in them. The biggest advantage of a running shoe is that I can use it for other things, but just golf. Not to be vain, but you look like a real goober wearing Footjoys in the supermarket.

      Reply

      Mike

      1 year ago

      Goober in the supermarket? But Trail running shoes look good on the golf course? As a caddy maybe, as a player…enter Goober.

      Reply

      Yaaqob

      1 year ago

      Caddying isn’t swinging a golf club. You could caddy in hiking boots and be fine or even soccer cleats. That doesn’t mean when you twist and turn and try to push off the ground in the golf swing that you have the stability you need in that motion.

      Reply

      Ryan

      1 year ago

      I just didn’t think it was a fair comparison. Yes, I think you look stupid in golf shoes anywhere other than a golf course, and I’ve never thought non-golf shoes look bad on the golf course.
      Also, I don’t need the extra traction and stability. Maybe I just don’t have weak ankles. I’ve played in everything from FJ DNA’s to Hey Dudes and flip flops. I don’t like having special shoes that I only wear on the golf course. Seems wasteful.
      And, before you say I don’t need stability cuz I’m slow, my clubhead is 115-118 with the driver.
      Could have done a better study, MGS. But, hey, these fanboys are happy.

      Ranny

      1 year ago

      I play spikeless in the Winter/Fall and then switch to my all time favorite Footjoy Golf Sandals. Just put on new spikes. Amazing how the old ones had worn.

      Reply

      Golf in Vans!

      1 year ago

      Vans Ultrarange Exo are my favorite shoe to play in if it’s dry or not-too-wet. With a waterproof toe to boot! Never had traction issues. Super light, and they’re vans 😎

      Reply

      Connor Lindeman

      1 year ago

      Interesting! I do love the Ultrarange Exo casually, but haven’t tried them out on the course!

      Reply

      Keith

      1 year ago

      The most important element for me is the lateral stability. My quality of strike plummets without golf shoes…

      Reply

      Mark

      1 year ago

      I have a nice collection of golf shoes. Almost all spikeless over the last decade or so. One issue is breathability. Even those sold as “athletic” type golf shoes do not breath like a running shoe (not trail shoe). Little firmer base for more support during swing. I prefer running shoes in the summer when its 105 out because they breath better even if I sacrifice a little side stability. Like to think it “smooths” out my swing…but I have been known to play in flip flops too.

      Reply

      CoachD

      1 year ago

      I like to play dry conditions with baseball turf shoes. I have found that they are more comfortable and they are sturdy as well. Of course when conditions are wet, I prefer to use the golf shoes with soft spikes, I have found that even the spikeless golf shoes still do not prevent slippage in heavy dew or light rain.

      Reply

      Connor Lindeman

      1 year ago

      Thanks for sharing, I’ve always been curious about baseball turf shoes, too. Which model do you use?

      Reply

      CoachD

      1 year ago

      My favorite is the Nike Alpha Huarache Elite 4. I have also used the Adidas Icon 7 turf shoes but they were not near as good as the Nike Alpha Huarache shoes.

      Keith Snyder

      1 year ago

      Good article but would have been better with a few more shoes at similar price points (i.e. budget friendly, medium, most expensive, “highest rated”). Both spikeless and trail shoes have tons of different makes and models addressing specific needs. There may be lower heeled trail runner that provide more stability or different lug patterns. Like other commenters I sometimes hit balls in my sneakers (Nike Flex) but usually only on shorter iron practice sessions. I like to practice how I play, and that means spiked golf shoes!

      Reply

      Connor Lindeman

      1 year ago

      Thanks for the feedback, Keith! I wanted to kind of “test the waters” first, but I agree, having a few more styles is something I think would be beneficial.

      Reply

      Claus Ingemann Moeller

      1 year ago

      Good test.

      how about testing this:
      Golfer plays with a watch with bracelet. then afterwards without. Then also test the different golfwatches..

      Then see how much it affects swingspeed, etc.

      It has been said that yyou should never play with a watch, because it’s too heavyy, and because it could break the watch (if mechanical).

      With all kinds of golfwatches available, could it actually hurt your swing, if wearing one?

      Thanks!

      Claus

      Reply

      Dave A

      1 year ago

      I always wear golf shoes when playing outdoors, but I have a simulator in my basement and found that training sneakers work great. They typically have a stable sole with very little to no drop from heel to toe like running sneakers. They also have plenty of traction on my indoor turf. I could’ve gone with spikeless golf shoes, but I didn’t want to put the added wear and tear on my turf with the more aggressive sole. This is more of an indoor vs outdoor topic though.

      Reply

      RobC

      1 year ago

      Interesting article and an issue that I’ve contemplated a few times over the last year. One pet peeve that I have, being a Lefty, is that some shoes will have their tread optimized for a right handers swing. Remember, Etonic shoes anyone??

      In that case, the golf shoe will provide me, no better traction than a trail runner. So as with many things in life “it depends…”.

      Reply

      CrashTestDummy

      1 year ago

      I use trail running shoes when I go practice sometimes, but never have played with them. There are tons of different variations of trail running shoes, so some may work fine, but why use shoes not designed for golf?

      There are more reasons to use shoes designed for golf than not. Many golf shoes are much lower in price than trail running shoes. Also, trail running shoes were not necessarily designed for greens, so who knows what the impact on the greens may be. So, might as well just use shoes designed for golf.

      Reply

      Da Slammer

      1 year ago

      Wait – aren’t there waterproof trail shoes? Why wouldn’t you test those instead of this breathable one? lol

      Reply

      Bryclops

      1 year ago

      That’s what I was thinking. My Merrell Novas have Gore-tex, grip for days, and a stable base. They would go toe-to-toe with any spikeless golf shoe on the course, but they also work for other pursuits. Complete win, in my book.

      Reply

      Bill

      1 year ago

      I am a big fan of trail shoes for golf, but not the Hoka’s. I always don’t wear then if it is generally wet – like early morning rounds with dew or as NC courses are now – very wet from all the rain. But for afternoon rounds on a dry golf course the Altra’s that I use provide plenty of grip on my home course. Also, given the Adidas shoe was highest rated, I find them to be on the narrow side and very uncomfortable in general, but do wear other brands like I did last night walking 9 holes w/ a wet golf course.

      Reply

      Don White

      1 year ago

      I agree! I logged over 65,000 mile’s running for 36 year and my experience is the less shoe there is the better the running shoe is! In my opinion the Hoya is way to much shoe.

      Reply

      Jack Burton's Porkchop Express

      1 year ago

      I’ll add a disclaimer at the beginning that I’m a huge shoe dork, especially running shoes… especially trail running shoes. I log about 1000 miles a year running and a lot of that time is spent on dirt.

      While I like the competition here, I don’t think the shoes are remotely close in form or function. Like comparing a sedan to a pickup truck. HOKAs are known for their super cushy bottoms and high stack height. The higher you elevate the foot off the ground, the more prone to rolling ankles, especially in a lateral movement like a golf swing. Also, the “waterproofness” test isn’t apples to apples. Trail running shoes (unless they are Gore Tex or similar) are meant to take on & shed water. So, by design they are gonna get wet.

      What would be cool to see is a head to head comparison of two shoes that are similar in both form & function. For example, taking a pair of TRUE OGs & a pair of Altra Lone Peaks (the All Weather variety) and seeing how they compare. Both shoes are zero-drop (the are the same height in front & back), both shoes are about the same stack height, and both shoes are meant to repel water. Oh and they are about the same price point. I would wager a guess these two shoes would have a nice little battle to see which performs better.

      Finally, I love the fact that you guys test this stuff and appreciate all the effort you put in here. So, my comments aren’t meant to be sucky, just one Running Shoe apologist’s thoughts.

      Reply

      Thomas A

      1 year ago

      This is where I climb up on my high horse. Neither are good for your feet. Both are too narrow, too high off the ground, have too much hee/toe drop, and have too much cushioning resulting in instability. Golf shoes should be flexible, low to the ground, have zero or minimal heel/toe drop, and a foot shaped toe box, not a triangle shaped toe box.
      If you need to wear a trail running shoe for golf, make it the Altra Superior or Lone Peak, or the Lone Peak GTX for waterproof.
      Clearly the only golf shoe you should wear is True Linkswear.

      Reply

      Dave Hall

      1 year ago

      Bingo! You hit the nail on the head, Thomas. Working as a caddie in the Puget Sound region of Washington, (Chambers Bay), and playing golf in all sorts of terrain, I also favor the Altra Lone Peak GTX for both looping and playing throughout the year. And while I live at the epicenter of the TRUE universe, and own a bunch of their shoes, the newer models are a bit too tight for walking 18 in pure comfort. My favored alternative to Altra is the Salomon Sense Ride line, both gore-tex and non gore-tex versions. I’ve caddied 55 straight holes (in one day) wearing both brands, and had zero blisters or hot spots. And I played 13 rounds in 14 days in Ireland last summer, walking every course, wearing a combination of Altra Lone Peak and Salomon Sense-Ride shoes, and had nary a slip or discomfort. (Disclaimer: I don’t swing with the force of Lexi, Scottie, or DJ, which also reduces the chance of slipping!)

      Reply

      Ritch

      1 year ago

      I didn’t see this addressed and maybe it isn’t an issue, but Hokas have thicker soles than standard issue spikeless shoes. I wonder if that could be an issue in swing and ball contact. I have New Balance golf and trail running shoes. I’ve played a couple rounds in the trail shoes and they are very comfortable on the course but lack a little stability compared to the stiffer sides of the golf shoes.

      Reply

      Connor Lindeman

      1 year ago

      Hi Ritch, thanks for sharing. I can definitely understand that concern! Initially I thought making contact would be a problem, but I was able to quickly adjust to the difference in height.

      Reply

      Doby

      1 year ago

      Not a great comparison. Hokus have a really high heel. I do own a few pairs (their recovery shoes are awesome). But I’ve never felt comfortable running in them. For walking they are really comfy. A better comparison would be something like Saucany’s trail shoes. I sometimes play golf in them. I prefer my Ecco golf shoes but the Saucany are fine.

      Reply

      Connor Lindeman

      1 year ago

      Appreciate your comment. I agree, love their recovery stuff! I found this comparison to be fitting because like the Hoka, the CodeChaos 22 has a much thicker midsole than most. But I agree, other spikeless shoes don’t have nearly the stack height as these two competitors do!

      Reply

      Prophet76

      1 year ago

      I agree with the stability part, but as someone who switches back and forth between the Nike Air Zoom and the Hoka Speedgoat 5 and Hoka Torrent 2, I would say the Torrent 2 is a better golf shoe for a trail runner. I think the traction competition would have been much closer, and the stability is improved over the speedgoat, although not quite to the Nike standard. Maybe I need to try the adidas, but my past with Adidas is they hurt my feet… and if my feet hurt, my round sucks!

      Reply

      don

      1 year ago

      I do wear shoes other than golf shoes due to diabetes and bad back. Your article hit it on the head, I always need to find a very stable shoe and sometimes give up traction..

      Reply

      Drew Farron

      1 year ago

      Someone should have told Robert Landers that lol!

      Reply

      Hopp

      1 year ago

      I have code Chaos shoes and I like them, but they aren’t the end all be all when it gets wet. Played in St George Ut a couple of weeks ago and slipped mulitple times on the tee box with my code chaos. What was happenins is the lugs packed up with wet grass and mud and they didn’t bite down into the grass. Now I am under no illusion that my Hoka trail runners that I wear daily would have prevented this, but I don’t think Code Chaos are the end all be all shoes in wet weather for traction. They did keep my feet dry in heavy rain so they are very waterproof.

      Reply

      Connor Lindeman

      1 year ago

      Great observation, thanks for sharing. Love St. George, used to play out there a lot! Agreed, similar to grooves on a wedge, when dirt and mud gets stuck in the lugs it can make them less effective!

      Reply

      David

      1 year ago

      Not a fan of the trail shoe choice. The massive cushioning that Hoka uses in its “Maximalist” shoes leave runners at a greater risk of turning ankles on the trail while running. I’d like to see a “standard cushioning (such as Brooks Cascadia 16) and a “Minimalist” (such as Innovate Trailtalon 235 v3).

      Reply

      MIGregB

      1 year ago

      I never had any illusions that any type of trail/running/walking shoe could compare too closely with a golf shoe as I often only take my running shoes with me & borrow clubs when I travel where only 1 round is in the cards. The moment ANY moisture is present, usually in the form of dew, I slip all over the place. But your test was far more telling than I imagined. Thanks.

      Reply

      Chris

      1 year ago

      Great timing, I just switched to the speed goat 5 as my golf shoe. I bought the waterproof goretex version though. I can’t imagine going back, walking 18 in my hokas is orders of magnitude better than my tour260 boa shoes. Stability isn’t an issue in my mind for guys not swinging like tour pros. Very cool to see this review though when I literally made the switch about 2 weeks ago with the waterproof version of this shoe.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Irons
    Apr 24, 2024
    PXG Irons: Model By Model
    Putters
    Apr 23, 2024
    PING 2024 Putter Line Extension
    News
    Apr 23, 2024
    Nelly Korda Deserves Her Caitlin Clark Moment, So Why Isn’t She Getting It?
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.