2022 Srixon Q-STAR Tour Golf Balls
Golf Balls

2022 Srixon Q-STAR Tour Golf Balls

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

2022 Srixon Q-STAR Tour Golf Balls

2022 Srixon Q-STAR Tour Golf Balls – Key Takeaways

The new 2022 Srixon Q-STAR Tour is the fourth generation of what started out as a very intriguing ball. When it came out in early 2017, the Q-STAR Tour was a bit of a unicorn. It was most definitely on the soft side but it was a urethane-covered ball that was originally priced to move at less than $30.

It didn’t have the speed of a firmer Tour-level ball. But for the target golfer, it was plenty fast enough. And while it didn’t have quite the spin of a Tour-level ball, for the target golfer, it was spinn-y enough.

The category itself—a soft-ish ball with a urethane cover for under 40 bucks—is popular with consumers. It may not have the same pizzazz as your Tour-level balls but golfers seem to like them.

And if you liked the 2020 Srixon Q-STAR Tour, you’ll be happy to know Srixon followed the ball maker’s Hippocratic oath: First, do no harm.

Srixon Q-STAR Tour

2022 Srixon Q-STAR Tour: What’s New?

In a word: not much. Well, that’s two words but you get the idea.

“The goal with this new version was to make some incremental improvements without reinventing the wheel,” says Srixon General Manager Brian Schielke. “The new Q-STAR Tour features a softer mid-layer which produces better feel and an increase in spin.”

The 2020 Q-STAR Tour was a middle-of-the-road performer in last year’s MGS Ball Test. By and large, it was low spin with both the driver and iron at all three swing speeds tested. And out of all 37 balls tested, it finished no lower than 12th in iron carry distance in each swing speed. Driver distance, however, was a different story. It was a top-half performer in the mid-swing speed category but finished near the bottom with both high and low swing speeds.

Getting a 72-compression ball to spin like a firmer Tour-level ball is next to impossible. And making the mid-layer softer isn’t going to help much. Greenside spin comes from a larger delta between a soft thin cover and a firm mid-layer. Srixon has the thinnest urethane covers in the game (Q-STAR Tour’s is 0.5mm, same as the Z-STAR) and Srixon’s unique spin-enhancing SeRM coating will help. But, in this case, spin is relative.

Srixon Q-STAR Tour

Q-STAR Tour won the spin contest in Srixon’s head-to-head wedge testing against the TaylorMade Tour Response and the Titleist Tour Speed. With a 58-degree wedge and a 35-mph swing, the Q-STAR Tour had nearly 400 more rpm than the TaylorMade and nearly 800 more than the Titleist. It was, of course, Srixon’s test, so the results should be taken with a prescription-strength grain of salt.

FastLayer Cores and Speed Dimples

When Srixon introduced the Q-STAR Tour DIVIDE two-color balls last spring, they included much of what’s new in this “standard” version. The high points are the ever-evolving FastLayer Core, that thinner cover we discussed earlier and an elongated alignment stamp.

Of the three, the new FastLayer core is the most interesting. If you move up Srixon’s ownership chain, you’ll ultimately arrive at Sumitomo Rubber Industries, the “SRI” in Srixon. SRI is a multi-billion-dollar tire and rubber company and, like Bridgestone, has rubber engineers coming out of its all-season radials. The FastLayer Core is a bit of rubber alchemy that’s soft in the center and gets progressively firmer toward the outside. The end result is a core that’s both firm and soft.

Srixon Q-STAR Tour

The thing is, Srixon is telling us this FastLayer Core is the softest overall yet used in a Q-STAR Tour. Srixon says the 2022 Q-STAR Tour compression is still 72, the same as the 2020 model. I’m sure that will be one of the first tests we do in Ball Lab.

Another Srixon signature is the 338 Speed Dimple Pattern. Srixon balls do have a reputation for performing well in the wind and the 338 Speed Dimple Pattern is designed to reduce drag and increase lift. Lower drag helps keep the ball online while greater lift helps keep the ball in the air longer.

The Elephant in the Room

MyGolfSpy readers have excellent memories and I’m certain you remember the 2020 Q-STAR Tour’s poor showing in our Ball Lab study. That study showed one out of every three balls tested wasn’t round and one out of every four had layer concentricity issues which lead to wide compression inconsistencies in a single ball.

We’ve discussed this with Srixon whenever Q-STAR Tours come up and, to its credit, the company has neither shied away from the results nor has it dismissed them.

Srixon Q-STAR Tour

“Quality is always a priority for us,” Schielke says. “And in development and production, we are ensuring the highest quality and consistency are going into each Q-STAR Tour.”

The most recent Z-STAR XV and Soft Feel balls have tested out considerably better than the Q-STAR Tour. The XV graded out to average which, I suppose, is neither good nor bad. And the Soft Feel, a low-compression two-piece ball selling for $23 per dozen, was slightly above average.

The bottom line is it will be interesting to see the Ball Lab results on not only the new Q-STAR Tour but Srixon’s other new offerings as well. Both the Z-STAR/Z-STAR XV DIVIDE and the Z-STAR Diamond are out now.

2022 Srixon Q-STAR Tour: Final Thoughts, Price and Availability

So where does the Srixon Q-STAR Tour fit? And, for that matter, where do the other players in the near Tour-ball category fit? Sales numbers suggest that while no one really likes paying $45 to $50 per dozen for an OEM’s premier ball, the folks that want high-level firmness and spin will pay for it.

Then there are the DTC contenders who provide that same Tour-level performance at $10 to $15 less per dozen.

“Q-STAR Tour really is one of the best values in golf,” insists Schielke. “It has the Tour-level urethane cover but is priced to give golfers added value. We know golfers will stick with it once they see the performance.”

One of the shifts we’re seeing in the golf ball market is line extension. OEMs are putting more offerings on the table in hopes of scratching different golf ball itches. Srixon is taking that to the next level. The new Q-STAR Tour release now brings its urethane ball count to 12.

That, friends, is a lot of retail space.

The new 2022 Srixon Q-STAR Tour golf balls are available in Pure White and Tour Yellow and sell for $34.99 per dozen.

They’re available starting today.

For more information, visit Srixon’s website.

For You

For You

News
Apr 25, 2024
Myrtle Beach Classic YouTube Qualifier Is An Interesting Concept That Doesn’t Quite Deliver
Golf Technology
Apr 25, 2024
Skillest is Reimagining Golf Instruction
Golf Bag Carts
Apr 25, 2024
Forum Member Review: Clicgear Model 4.0 Golf Push Cart
John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

John is an aging, yet avid golfer, writer, 6-point-something handicapper living back home in New England after a 22-year exile in Minnesota. He loves telling stories, writing about golf and golf travel, and enjoys classic golf equipment. “The only thing a golfer needs is more daylight.” - BenHogan

John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

John Barba





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Greg

      1 year ago

      The balls in you reviews seem to basically meet spec these days .
      Iwould like more data on wether the ball actually does what it is designed for.
      eg. what is the actual spin at such a speed and is it fade biased or is it low spin with the driver high spin with the wedge Then if it does what they say it does it should have a rating fit for purpose .It is of no use buying the best rated quality ball if it is not fit for purpose for a 80 mph swing speed.
      It is subjective data that would give these balls a better value in price.
      Down on quality but up on performance for a certain swing speed is not a bad trade .
      Up on quality and zero performance is a terrible buy and bad value.
      Just thinking .
      Thanks for your input and it is almost certain that your reviews have lifted the quality of balls we get these days ..

      Reply

      P.J.

      2 years ago

      I fell in love with the Q-Start Tour Divides, especially the look and feel, but was disappointed by the quality issues reported by MGS. I’ll continue to play them because I bought them when they were available. I just checked the stockpile I have and they’re all manufactured in the lower quality factory in Indonesia. Since they show up so well in dormant grass, they’re good winter balls for me. I’m heading to Mesquite next week for 5 rounds of golf – taking my Snell MTB-X and OnCore Elixer’s.

      Reply

      Lou

      2 years ago

      I like the Q Star Tour ball. I’m much more a fan of Srixon than is MGS and most of its readers. MGS killed Srixon and Callaway with its readers with very negative reviews so if either ever make the perfect ball there will still be MGS readers who will buy Snell instead. MGS readers have a long memory! The new Q Star Tour feels like butter coming off the putter blade and I happen to like that. I don’t want a hard click that explodes off the face. Overall, the ball performs as advertised. I don’t mind paying $35 a dozen. Srixon has sales. I don’t want to have to buy 5 or 6 dozen DTC balls just to save a couple of dollars. Versus how much clubs now cost, the ball at almost any price is cheap!

      Reply

      Buck watson

      2 years ago

      Right on Bro! I’ve played this ball a lot recently and I play to an approx 6 hdcp and I really like it. Just as good a ball as the Taylormade Tour Response and a few others. An excellent ball for the price!

      Reply

      Brad

      2 years ago

      I’ve been playing Q Star Tours for the last 2 years. I’m a bogey golfer with a 95mph driver speed who thought he was too erratic for a premium ball but was unhappy playing cheap balls. I bought a few dozen Q Star Tours on a great deal from Hurricane Golf. I love the overall performance which gives me a great combination of distance and control. The only quality issue I’ve encountered was having to take a ball out of play after blading a bunker shot. I don’t know if I’d play them at $35 per dozen, but if you can get them on a buy 2 get 1 (like I did with the Q Star Divides) they are a must buy for any golfer looking for a ball upgrade without having to pay tour ball prices.

      Reply

      Chris

      2 years ago

      Slowly becoming a big Srixon fan and frankly, I like that they only make incremental “improvements.” Makes it easier to stick with a model and get consistent results year over year. I stocked up on Z-Stars during the Father’s Day promo last June and switched over to the Divide (red/yellow) version of the QST when temps dipped below 50* — softer in the cold and easier to find in dormant grass and fallen leaves. Both models are excellent, predictable performers, long and well-behaved. QST launches a little higher, iron shots fly 5 yds farther, and greenside chips don’t check quite as hard. Took me about 12 holes to adjust and my scores are back in the 78-82 range where they always are. Wait for the promos and it gets really hard to justify the price premium for a theoretically “superior” ball.

      Reply

      El

      2 years ago

      As I recall, a lot of the QST consistency issues were attributed by MSG to it’s being manufactured in (I believe) Indonesia, as opposed to Srixon’s top ball facility in Japan.

      As of 2021, all the QST boxes at my local retailer listed Japan as country of creation. If that brings it up to par with the Z line, one terrific ball for the target golfer.

      Reply

      Mike

      2 years ago

      If I had to buy balls, this would be one of my choices. But I see the price has gone up to $35. I guess we all should get used to the inflation that has worked its way into the golf ball market.

      Reply

      Nick D

      2 years ago

      Not sure how one can get past ball test findings. Huge problem with out of round balls. Absent manufacturer evidence to the contrary this is a non starter.

      Reply

      Oldpromoe

      2 years ago

      Your email

      “The 2022 Q-Star is said to have “incremental improvements without reinventing the wheel.”
      Can we expect the same consistency for the new year?”

      is not consistent with your article. Q STAR VS Q Star Tour

      Also 2020 vs 2022
      “Srixon says the 2020 Q-STAR Tour compression is still 72, the same as the 2020 model.”

      Reply

      Bill Z

      2 years ago

      I’m really interested in the Ball Lab study on this. My Gokf Soy has completely changed the golf balls I use and why. Everything from Ball Lab, to your tests in scratches, mud, and the dreaded golf cart path chips. I literally chuck those balls in the bag and give them to new players that just don’t care.

      Thanks for all the hard work you all do.

      Reply

      Douglas Mael

      2 years ago

      I played the original Srixon Q-Star Tour balls in 2017-18, and was very happy with them, but as the price went up and the quality plummeted in 2019-20, I transitioned to DTC balls (Snell MTB & MTB-X models, and then the OnCore Vero X1, both of which provide better performance and consistency at about $8 to $10 less per dozen when you buy three to five dozen balls.. The Vero X1 is my current golf ball of choice, and it performs great for me.

      If Srixon has straightened out the serious quality and consistency issues that haunted the last-generation Q-Star Tour balls, they could be a decent choice for average golfers with average golfer swing speeds, especially when Srixon is offering their famous 3-for-2 dozen deals.

      Reply

      Dan

      2 years ago

      So it’s in the upper half for distance of the medium swing speeds, but what actually is that? 95 mph, 90 mph, 85??? Is there a range?

      Reply

      Tyson

      2 years ago

      It’s in their ball test if you go and look for yourself

      Reply

      Kona Kika

      1 year ago

      DRIVER DISTANCE CARRY (YDS) <140 140 170 200 230 260 290 320
      SWING SPEED (MPH) <70 70 80 90 100 110 120 130
      PRO CHECK BARS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
      OPTIMUM HARDNES V SOFT SOFT SOFT MED MED FIRM FIRM V FIRM

      Reply

      Steve S

      2 years ago

      Tried a couple different versions of Q-Stars. Overall reaction was “meh”. Found 11 of 12 to fail the “epson salt in water spin test” when I tried it with a dozen. Maxfli Tour is a much better ball for me and can usually be had for $30 or less on sale.

      Reply

      Gary Kephart

      2 years ago

      I tried the Srixon Z-Star XV for 3 holes the other day and it was favorable compared to my go to ball, Pro V1x. I believe it flew higher than the Pro V1x with less spin on the driver. Iron shots seemed to go a bit further too. If the new Q Star Tour is an improvement over the 2020 model as the Z Star is I see Srixon making a dent in the ball market.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    News
    Apr 25, 2024
    Myrtle Beach Classic YouTube Qualifier Is An Interesting Concept That Doesn’t Quite Deliver
    Golf Technology
    Apr 25, 2024
    Skillest is Reimagining Golf Instruction
    Golf Bag Carts
    Apr 25, 2024
    Forum Member Review: Clicgear Model 4.0 Golf Push Cart
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.