A Closer Look: Snell PRIME 2.0 Golf Ball
Golf Balls

A Closer Look: Snell PRIME 2.0 Golf Ball

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

A Closer Look: Snell PRIME 2.0 Golf Ball

Earlier this year, we introduced you to Snell Golf’s PRIME family of golf balls. While each of the three has its audience, the PRIME 2.0 is the most interesting, if for no other reason than it’s a bit of a golf ball unicorn.

About the Snell Prime 2.0

A Snell Prime 2.0 golf ball

While it may not be accurate to say that the Snell Prime 2.0 is the only two-piece urethane golf ball in the marketplace, it’s certainly the only one (at least right now) that’s likely to be played by a MyGolfSpy reader.

Historically, two-piece urethane balls have been a challenge to make. On the positive side, manufacturers were able to generate more greenside spin because of the urethane cover. The trade-off was that the high-spin properties carried through the bag, leaving you with a ball that was slow, spinny and ultimately short off the driver.

Cool.

According to Dean Snell, relatively recent advances in core technology have made two-piece urethane viable and, with that, created a unique opportunity in the market that Snell Golf is more than happy to fill.

Snell Prime 2.0 Compression

Snell PRIME 2.0

As you may know, compression is a measurement of how firm (or soft) a golf ball is. Today’s marketplace ranges from roughly 40 compression (Callaway Supersoft) to 100-plus (Titleist Pro V1x Left Dash, Wilson Staff Model X).

Compression correlates strongly with feel (lower compression balls often feel softer) but there’s some wiggle room in that, depending on the materials and construction of the golf ball.

Dean Snell says the Prime 2.0 is approximately 80 compression. On paper, that’s solidly in the mid to mid-firm range. Performance characteristics aside, it’s in the same compression ballpark as Titleist AVX and Velocity, Bridgestone TOUR B RX, and Srixon Z-Star.

I mention the two Titleist offerings because they make for a perfect illustration of how materials impact the feel equation. While roughly the same compression, I’d wager there isn’t a golfer on the planet who wouldn’t tell you the AVX doesn’t feel significantly softer than Velocity.

The point in all of this is that while the Prime 2.0 is mid-compression ball, the competitive set, while low compression, is made up of ionomer offerings. What the PRIME 2.0 lacks in low compression, it makes up via the softer urethane cover.

a closeup of a Snell Prime 2.0 golf ball

Snell Prime 2.0 Performance

Snell describes the PRIME 2.0 as offering higher launch with mid-high iron spin, and very soft feel.

As golf balls decrease in compression, manufacturers typically compensate for the speed loss with higher ball flight. That’s not entirely the case here, if for no other reason than at 80 compression, you’re still in the ballpark of the low end of what gets played on Tour.

Driver and iron spin rates should also fall in the mid range, with for the target player being the operative words.

The real benefit of the 2.0 over most similarly priced balls is that the urethane cover should provide more greenside spin than those ionomer-covered alternatives.

The caveat is that, without the firm mantle layer found in three-, four- and five-piece models to pinch against, you’re not going to see as much spin as you would in a ball with what’s often described as “Tour-level construction”.

Who the Snell Prime 2.0 is For (and Who It Isn’t)

The core of a Snell Prime 2.0 golf ball

To keep things simple, Snell says the PRIME 2.0 is ideal for golfers who hit their 7-iron 125 yards or less. While a complete golf ball fitting extends beyond just swing speed, it can help you eliminate some balls from the competitive set.

For slow to moderate swing speed players seeking more greenside spin than they’re getting with a two-piece ball without having to give up the budget-friendly pricing, the Snell PRIME 2.0 is one of the more interesting offerings on the market.

Mid to faster swingers are going to miss the mantle layer and are likely to suffer a significant performance penalty (most notably balls speed) as a result. Those golfers are likely better suited to the PRIME 3.0 or PRIME 4.0.

Availability and Pricing

The Snell PRIME 2.0 is available now. Retail price for a dozen is $24.99. Prices drop with each dozen you buy, bottoming out at $21.99 if you buy five dozen or more. If you’re looking to try the entire Snell PRIME lineup, the 2.0 is included in the Snell Test Pack alongside the Get Sum, PRIME 3.0 and PRIME 4.0.

For more information or to order yours, visit Snellgolf.com.

This article was written in partnership with Snell.

For You

For You

First Look
Jun 26, 2024
TaylorMade Teams Up With Unlikely Partner For New Shoe Release
Drivers
Jun 25, 2024
PING Offers G430 MAX 10K HL Driver Exchange Program
First Look
Jun 25, 2024
New Vice Golf Irons and Wedges: What We Know
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Vince

      3 days ago

      Do a Ball Lab on this line of Snell balls already.

      Reply

      TimmerGeefromBC

      3 days ago

      I purchased the Snell sampler pack, with the full expectation the 2.0 would be best for my suddenly-slowing swing speed (I really need to be loose and warmed up to get close to 80). Hit that first, and thought to myself, “not bad”. Since I was playing on my own at the end of the day, I brought out the others. Hit the 3.0, then the 4.0. WOW. More distance from both and great ball flight. There were times I would hit them both from the same tee and they would be side-by-side on the fairway. Definitely impressed and will order more of both. I did not try the GetSum sleeve which was included in the sampler dozen. I am sold on Snell.

      Reply

      Doctor K

      3 days ago

      I am right in the middle of the target market. 7 iron 130 yds and driver swing speed 83 mph.
      I found this ball plays “hard”even on center strikes, shorter with irons and driver compared to premium balls as well as the 3 piece urethane balls and has a very low flight. It putts ok but nothing special. If I could return them, I would. The 10 balls I haven’t hit will either go in the practice bag or I will leave them for the grounds crew at the course

      Reply

      HikingMike

      3 days ago

      “Our new 2-piece urethane golf ball designed for more leisurely swing speeds.”

      It would be interesting to see how my older golf buddies would get on with this Snell 2.0 ball, as they will play 2-piece balls, higher launch could help, and better greenside spin than competitor balls.

      The dimples look intriguing – kind of flat like a Titleist AVX. But I thought that was good for low flight. Hmm.

      Reply

      Leon

      3 days ago

      I thought I fit into the target market for the Snell Prime 3.0 so I bought a box. They turned out to feel nicely soft but I lost significant yardage off the longer clubs, almost a club’s worth, depending on the landing spot terrain. This was comparing to the ball my Callaway fitter put me into, their ERC Soft he used to fit me for Paradym X driver shaft. Yardage losses were progressively less as the clubs got shorter. Performance-wise, my game is not of the caliber that I can tell a 3-piece ball from a 4-piece without seeing the box it came from, so the 4.0 might wait a while. I donated the rest of that box to my local range.

      Reply

      Scott

      3 days ago

      FWIW, I have found that for some ball models, the 4 piece (usually X) model plays better for me but not universally. For example, I hit the Maxfli Tour X much better than the standard Tour, but I hit the Pro V1 much better than the Pro V1x.

      Reply

      Matt

      3 days ago

      I know (okay, I THINK) it’s a typo, but “…are going to miss the mangle layer” genuinely made me laugh out loud, as I spent way too long trying to figure out what the mangle layer WAS, and who the golfers were that would miss it.

      Cool to see Snell continuing to change things up by offering something most other major ball-makers aren’t. I’ll be very curious to try their new 3-piece offerings later this year!

      Reply

      OMFS

      3 days ago

      Did Dean really say this is for people who hit their 7 iron 125 or less? Maybe I’ve been loft jacked into oblivion here, but that’s really short, right?

      Reply

      Larry

      3 days ago

      Trust Golf has had a two piece Urethane cover ball called “Panther” for some time now. They do play OK for a distance ball with a fairly good putting feel. I played a dozen Yellow ones, just did not care for loss of wedge spin into greens, but if you like to run the ball into greens it is a good ball.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    First Look
    Jun 26, 2024
    TaylorMade Teams Up With Unlikely Partner For New Shoe Release
    Drivers
    Jun 25, 2024
    PING Offers G430 MAX 10K HL Driver Exchange Program
    First Look
    Jun 25, 2024
    New Vice Golf Irons and Wedges: What We Know