Callaway ERC Soft Golf Ball (2023)
Golf Balls

Callaway ERC Soft Golf Ball (2023)

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Callaway ERC Soft Golf Ball (2023)
  • Callaway has announced the 2023 version of its three-piece ERC Soft golf ball.
  • Increased speed is provided by a new HyperElastic SoftFast Core.
  • A GRIP Urethane coating over the ionomer cover provides more spin.
  • Retail price is $39.99.

a photo of the 2023 Callaway ERC Soft golf ball

It is the stated goal of Callaway Golf’s ball division to make the best-performing product in each segment and at each price point.

Overlooking for the moment that the company doesn’t offer a true Titleist Pro V1 competitor (and my personal feeling that there are market segments and price points at which no golf ball should exist), the launch of the new ERC Soft is both unexpectedly and unusually compelling.

That’s right. Much to my own surprise, I find myself intrigued by an ionomer-covered ball.

What makes this Callaway ERC Soft better (and more interesting) than the last boils down to two key technologies.

HyperElastic SoftFast Core

the Core of the 2023 Callaway ERC Soft golf ball

As noted in my story on the new Callaway Supersoft, HyperElastic SoftFast Core is a bit of technology that has trickled down from the Chrome Soft franchise.

As with Supersoft, ERC’s take on HESFC (I’m not typing all of that again) is about boosting speed from the core of the golf ball without increasing compression.

Golfers like ERC Soft because, even if it’s not super-soft, it’s still kinda soft (preliminary tests suggest compression in the mid-70s), so Callaway is still not particularly interested in trading soft feel for extra speed.

The objective is to generate more ball speed without jacking compression.

Callaway ERC Soft golf balls (2023 model)

Digging into the technical aspects of how that works, Callaway found that inside the ERC Soft Core were some unreacted non-resilient materials. Given that more than 100 materials go into making a golf ball, it stands to reason that some bits would do more than others.

You can think of those less useful materials as filler that, in addition to not doing anything to make the ball faster, can impede the elasticity of the core.

To make the core faster, Callaway developed technology (chemistry is probably the more accurate word) that reacts with the previously useless material groups. The end result is increased cross-link density which ultimately leads to more elastic energy at deformation (which is what happens at impact).

(Frankly, you don’t need to know any of this because the simple takeaway is that the new ERC Soft produces more speed at the same compression.)

That said, I thought sharing just a bit of the more complex technical details might make you think a bit more deeply (and more critically) the next time some direct-to-consumer brand tells you that a couple of dudes sitting on a couch somewhere managed to engineer a golf ball that outperforms the industry leaders.

GRIP Urethane Coating

A cutaway of the core and GRIP Urethane cover of the Callaway ERC Soft golf ball

The other bit of compelling technology in the new Callaway ERC Soft is what the company is calling a GRIP urethane coating.

I know what you’re thinking: “I thought you said ERC Soft was an ionomer-covered ball?”

I did, and it is, which is admittedly confusing, but stay with me.

For the new ERC Soft golf ball, Callaway is taking a high-elongation urethane formulation and applying it on top of ERC Soft’s ionomer cover.

In simple terms, “high elongation” means the material is really stretchy and, because of that, it prolongs the contact time between the face and ball at the type of low-speed shots you play around the green.

the core and cover of the Callaway ERC Soft golf ball after aggressive removal

While Callaway tells me the GRIP urethane application process is proprietary, I think it’s safe to assume that it’s sprayed on the ball as opposed to formed in a mold.

The performance result is lower launch with more spin which is pretty much what all of us want around the green.

For the sake of clarification, the GRIP urethane coating only increases spin around the green. Through the rest of the bag, the ERC Soft retains its low spin properties. Durability is not impacted by this new coating.

a closeup of the Triple Track pattern on the Callaway ERC Soft golf ball
Callaway Triple Track Technology

ERC Soft – How much more spin?

To put a number on it, Callaway says upwards of 400 rpm more spin than the previous model. And, sure, the ERC Soft franchise isn’t exactly known for its greenside spin properties but I don’t care: a 400-rpm increase is significant.

For what it’s worth, on a cursory level, the story checks out. Every “Tour” ball on the market features urethane over ionomer construction.

Of course, that’s invariably a full urethane cover over an ionomer mantle but the same rules (soft layers over hard layers create spin) should apply here.

I’m not sure it’s necessary but it’s definitely interesting.

a closeup of the Callaway logo on a 2023 ERC Soft golf ball

Coming to terms with the Callaway ERC Soft golf ball

That said, I am divided as far as the GRIP urethane coating is concerned. On one hand, it seems kinda silly. If you’re going to put urethane over a cover, why not just put a real urethane cover on it and be done? I feel we’re jumping through unnecessary hoops here.

On the other hand, Callaway probably doesn’t want ERC Soft stepping into Chrome Soft territory and the probability is that GRIP urethane will trickle down to the really cheap stuff eventually.

If you insist on making cheap two-piece balls for the frugal “soft” crowd, I suppose there’s something to be said for trying to make them better.

A sub-$25 ball that actually spins, or at least spins significantly more, isn’t without its appeal. Not to me. But it must to somebody.

And, not for nothing, Callaway loves its points of differentiation and spraying urethane over an ionomer cover is something nobody else is doing. So there’s that.

the packaging of the 2023 Callaway ERC Soft golf ball

Options, Pricing and Availability

The Callaway ERC Soft is available in Triple Track White and Triple Track Yellow.

Retail price is $39.99 per dozen. Availability begins Jan. 27.

For more information, visit CallawayGolf.com.

For You

For You

News
Apr 25, 2024
Myrtle Beach Classic YouTube Qualifier Is An Interesting Concept That Doesn’t Quite Deliver
Golf Technology
Apr 25, 2024
Skillest is Reimagining Golf Instruction
Golf Bag Carts
Apr 25, 2024
Forum Member Review: Clicgear Model 4.0 Golf Push Cart
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Colby

      11 months ago

      When will this get tested to put on the golf ball comparison chart? Interested to see how it performs against the others as this is my number one ball of choice even if it doesn’t spin a lot on the greens as I have a moderate swing speed I can still hit this 260 with my buddies hitting ProVs.

      Reply

      Dennis Odom

      1 year ago

      I bought some chrome soft balls for my simulator and two of them have broke in half.

      Reply

      Paul Grobar

      1 year ago

      Firstly, I get frustrated trying to find ball “reviews” and only find “the company says” information without testing. Next, MGS too often has players critiquing a ball that isn’t meant for thier level of play. The result is a “snobby” commentary that doesn’t fit my reality. Two successive year reviews of this ball are now guilty. Have an 85mph/20 handicapper play the ERC and then talk to me.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      1 year ago

      Paul, I’m afraid you’ve been duped.

      When it comes to finding the right ball for your game, the most important characteristics are flight and spin. Feel is perhaps a distant 3rd. While there’s a case to be made that slower swing speed players prefer softer golf balls, swing speed is, at best, a small part of the ball fitting equation.

      As far as handicap … there are high handicappers who generate a ton of spin and high handicappers that are low spin guys. Some hit the ball high, some hit it low. Some have fast swing speeds, some don’t.

      Handicap isn’t a fitting variable, but it does play into the habits of preference driven golfers. If, as a high handicapper, you’re losing 6 balls a round, you may not want to spend $55 on Pro V1s, but those financial considerations don’t have anything to do with performance needs.

      Rather than rehash it all here, I’ll refer you to a couple of semi-recent posts.

      Our Golf Ball Compression Guide not only provides a comparison chart of compression for all the balls we’ve measured to date. The include FAQ details a good bit of the misinformation about compression, replacing the old wives tales with real information.

      Our Golf Ball Fitting 101 guide tackles the realies of golf ball fitting and explains what you need to consider when choosing the right ball for your game.

      Reply

      Jon C

      11 months ago

      Two things can be true at once. I agree with the poster about your snobby comments. You don’t seem to understand or account for the bogey, senior or slow swing golfer. The other thing that’s true is your ball fitting guide is an excellent approach to finding a ball and may put someone in an ERC soft which they would then not be duped. I’ve used the guide and your oft mentioned pro v1 and pro v1x doesn’t work nearly as well as the Srixon soft feel or Bridgestone Treosoft for me. Those two have similar construction. I graded various balls according to your criteria. I’m a Senior slower swing speed. Plan on testing the ERC soft.

      The Baron

      1 year ago

      Just got my hands on the erc balls…I play them anyway…like the length off the tee, soft feel on the greens, but gave up spin on approach…can’t have everything…the new version feels almost tacky/sticky…just a few holes with them, but they are long off the tee and mid irons…and appear to check quicker on greens?…still managed to hit a tree, full shot with a 6 wood and it didn’t mark the ball…very impressed….for what its worth, I’m a single figure player and (luckily) don’t worry about what the balls cost…I’ll keep playing erc over chromesoft or pro v

      Reply

      PJ

      1 year ago

      The article says “A sub-$25 ball that actually spins”, but then below the pricing is $39.99. All this is doing is keeping the DTC balls in business. Why would you pay ~$40 for a ionomer ball – even if it does have some magical coating to help it spin more?!? Does the urethane coating wear off after a period of time?
      For me, this is an easy pass….

      Reply

      Dan Cohen

      1 year ago

      Srixon has been doing this for several years with the coating they put on the AD333/Q-Star. Today’s Golfer tested it a couple of years back and on wedge shots it spun up there with the tour balls. That same test found the ERC was pretty fast with both driver and irons at all swing speeds. The price, though, is still too high for me for an ionomer ball though. Just too many urethane options at or below $40.

      Reply

      Mike

      1 year ago

      Wow, I guess rising prices have filtered down to the ball market also. $41 + tax (in many states) & you’re not even getting a real urethane ball. Not sure who the target market is here. If they could figure out a way to spray that urethane mix on their supersoft balls & keep the price at $25, they sell out the shelves.

      BUT. Don’t people realize you can buy mint condition balls online (i.e. eBay) for roughly half the price of new balls. I know this because, I’ve sold thousands & no one has ever been dissatisfied upon receiving them. I cannot imagine why someone, unless you’re a person that does not lose. Balls, would pay near $60 for a dozen new pro v1’s or other premium balls when other options are available. Oh, that’s right, the snobbiness factor probably sets in here!

      Reply

      Jjgolf

      1 year ago

      There have been some issues with the production over the years and this cover decision almost feels like they are using a gimmick hoping to leapfrog others to the top of the market. Just make good golf balls with no tricks and people will buy them because the callaway brand is strong.

      Reply

      Reid

      1 year ago

      Why not just play the Titleist Tour Speed, Vice Pro Soft or better than all these (and I hope ball lab does another robot round with the new balls to see how much better it is over the previous ball) the TaylorMade Tour Response. I love this ball. Been playing it since it was released last year. All three of the above are at that price point and all have a real urethane cover with the TR being cast just like the “Tour” balls.

      Reply

      Scott

      1 year ago

      I’ve always wondered who this ball is for. A better player who wants a softer ball? A tour ball with an ionomer cover to keep the price down for those who won’t pay for Chrome Soft?

      Reply

      Lou

      1 year ago

      Sounds just like a Srixon with Spin Skin. The main difference is Srixon is a little less expensive. Callaway has now brought their non-urethane ball up to $40. The Titleist Tour Soft, that is the direct competitor to the ERC Soft, is $37 so right there Callaway is going to be at a disadvantage. I played the ERC Soft 1st Edition and liked it. I did not like the DuPont 2nd Edition, that did not spin. Based on what I just read, I’ll just stick with Titleist AVX. I hit the ball so straight I can get 2-3 rounds out of every ball so that’s how I lower my cost.

      Reply

      Dave R

      1 year ago

      This is would be a fascinating one to see in the ball test. Priced like the Tour Response, it’ll be interesting to see how they compare given their differences in construction.

      Reply

      XHOOPER

      1 year ago

      Whatever happened to graphene?

      Reply

      Rocky

      1 year ago

      My thoughts exactly. It was supposedly the greatest thing ever.

      Reply

      TenBuck

      1 year ago

      Old tech ???

      Reply

      Steve Pona

      12 months ago

      It’s expensive and in very short supply (see expensive).

      Reply

      MIGregB

      1 year ago

      I agree that the GRIP coating is interesting, but more for its potential lower priced ball future application than for a $40/doz ball. A 70 cent per ball cost reduction isn’t enough to for me to switch from urethane balls. If I’m losing enough balls such that it is cost significant, I’m probably not going to be paying $40/doz to begin with. Besides, I still haven’t forgiven Callaway for foisting their crappy balls on the public years ago (of which I was one) before MGS exposed them, much to their initial denial. Although my embargo hasn’t extended to other equipment, it’ll be a very long time before I even try any of their balls; just waaaay too many really good alternatives before they find their way into my bag.

      Reply

      Jon

      1 year ago

      I couldn’t agree more. At this price point, I will continue to buy Maxfli Tour.

      Reply

      Rob

      1 year ago

      “A sub-$25 ball that actually spins, or at least spins significantly more, isn’t without its appeal. Not to me. But it must to somebody.”

      Actually that will appeal to the average golfer or worse. Someone who is more likely to lose a ball than take it out of play due to damage.. $40/dz is expensive if you are losing a sleeve or more on a round and there are plenty of golfers who do that.

      Reply

      Mike

      1 year ago

      Great post. Sometimes the MGS crew’s snobbiness surfaces & they forget that not everyone is a scratch/single-digit player who takes every round seriously & diligently records their score in a handicap system. Or maybe it’s the MGS readers that are snobby & the authors just feed them the talking points they think they want to hear.

      Reply

      Jon C

      11 months ago

      Couldn’t agree more!

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    News
    Apr 25, 2024
    Myrtle Beach Classic YouTube Qualifier Is An Interesting Concept That Doesn’t Quite Deliver
    Golf Technology
    Apr 25, 2024
    Skillest is Reimagining Golf Instruction
    Golf Bag Carts
    Apr 25, 2024
    Forum Member Review: Clicgear Model 4.0 Golf Push Cart
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.