Edel SMS Irons
Irons

Edel SMS Irons

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Edel SMS Irons
  • Edel SMS irons have been announced.
  • They feature Edel’s Swing Match system weighting.
  • Retail price is $250 per iron.
  • Availability begins July 21.

If you’ve seen the company’s wedges, the story behind the new Edel SMS irons probably won’t surprise you. For Edel, not only does the SMS iron provide an opportunity to refresh its iron lineup with its movable weight technology but it also gives it a much-needed variable-length offering to sit alongside the SLS single-length offering.

We’ll dig into the tech in more detail but the signature feature of the Edel SMS irons is that it leverages movable weight (as part of the fitting process) to dial in the best center-of-gravity location for each golfer.

It’s a point of differentiation unique to Edel. It’s the reason why the company states, “Your irons can’t do this.” The question golfers must answer for themselves is, “Do they need to?”

Edel SMS Construction

Before we dig into the performance of the Edel SMS irons, let’s take a quick look at the construction.

The SMS is a hollow-body design forged from 1025 carbon steel. By every measure, it fits the textbook definition of a player’s iron. While there will likely prove to be plenty that appeals to the better player, distance is unapologetically part of the Edel story.

That’s a notion reinforced by the use of maraging steel in the face of the Edel SMS iron. While that does open up the debate as to whether it’s fair to call an iron “forged” when the part that makes contact with the ball isn’t, well, ultimately that’s splitting hairs. Maraging steel is fast. That’s why it has traditionally been used in fairway and hybrid faces. The point is that the material offers more speed than you can get out of 1025.

Urethane Foam Filling

Edel says the SMS is the best-feeling player’s distance iron ever. That claim is inherently subjective and impossible to either prove but, as supporting evidence, Edel offers a proprietary urethane foam filling that dampens vibration and improves sound and feel.

That’s not an uncommon story in the player’s distance category but we can certainly appreciate that Edel isn’t overselling its take on goo filling as a magic speed enhancer. Sound and feel. That’s the point.

Players Grind Sole

Finally, the Edel SMS irons offer what the company calls a player’s grind. While there’s likely some nuance to the Edel implementation, the idea itself isn’t unique. It’s all about reducing drag as the club moves through the turf.

Edel SMS Weighting

As noted, the signature feature of the Edel SMS iron is the SMS (Swing Match System) weighting system that was introduced in the company’s wedges.

Your quick refresher is that SMS is a movable weight (and, by extension, movable center of gravity) system that purports to provide better performance by locating the CG in the ideal location for any given golfer.

SMS is a three-weight system that leverages a single heavy eight-gram weight alongside a pair of two-gram weights. Edel contends that dialing in the location of the heavy weight can lead to more consistent contact and better overall performance: more speed, better distance, improved control … that sort of stuff.

Edel SMS Iron Fitting

Determining the ideal weight location during a fitting is straightforward.

Golfers are asked to hit five shots with their gamer to create the baseline. Then they hit five shots each with the weight in the toe, center and heel positions. The results will reveal the best location for the heavy weight.

From there, a shaft determination is made before cycling back and dialing in the SMS weights to determine if the stock eight-gram weight is ideal or the golfer might get better results with the addition or subtraction of a couple of grams.

The Physics of Movable Weight

On paper, SMS reads like a fitting breakthrough. If nothing else, it provides Edel with a point of differentiation in the market. On the physics alone, however, I’m not entirely sold.

Here’s why:

The efficacy of an adjustable weight system is based on three things.

  • Amount of weight being moved
  • How far that weight is being moved
  • The distance of that movement from center of gravity

The most effective adjustable weight systems move a lot of mass over a large area (in golf design terms, anyway) and well away from the center of gravity. That last bit is the impetus for COBRA’s “radius of gyration” talking points that accompanied the release of the RadSpeed driver.

When we look at some of the most effective movable weight designs in the driver category, they shift the center of gravity by +/- 5mm.

a photo showing the players grind sole on the Edel SMS irons

With the stock build of the Edel SMS irons, you’ve only got six grams (eights if you have 10 grams of weight) being moved. That’s not a lot to begin with and, on percentage, it’s significantly less than we find in drivers where companies are pushing over 20 grams of weight around lighter heads. The point is that, in an iron design, the movable weight accounts for a significantly lower percentage of the total weight.

With the SMS irons, not only is there less weight being moved but it’s being moved over much smaller area. You’re swapping an eight-gram weight for the two-gram weight immediately next to it.  The comparably small amount of movement also means the weight isn’t shifting too far from the center of gravity.

That said, golf is a game of millimeters and fractions of degrees, so it’s well within the realm of possibility that the movable weights on the SMS irons could work. If there’s one thing I’ve learned, it’s that everything works for someone.

Maybe a small difference is all it takes.

Edel SMS Irons – Performance Data

As I’ve said countless times, when golf companies provide us with data, the home team always wins. As you would expect, the Edel irons performed really well compared to what the company’s 25 testers had in their bags.

In most cases, manufacturers only provide averages. Edel, however, provided every shot collected and that provides a unique opportunity to dig a bit deeper.

Backing Up the Claims

First, the data provided by Edel absolutely supports its claims. That said, while I’m not a fan of eyeballing outliers, a cursory glance suggests the Edel SMS irons may have benefitted from the test protocols themselves as the majority of the worst shots were hit with the testers’ gamers.

More on that in a bit but I suppose that if consistency is one of the selling point of the three-weight system that powers the Edel SMS irons, perhaps there’s a case to made for keeping absolutely every shot and rolling with what you get.

That is how it works in golf. Save the occasional breakfast ball, we don’t get to toss outliers on the golf course.

an address view of the long, middle, and short irons in the Edel SMS Iron set

A Deeper Dive

Here’s what the data shows.

Big ball-speed gains – On average, compared to their gamers, testers picked up 2.16 mph overall and 3.30 mph with the weight is in best position. All but one of the 25 golfers in the test produced higher ball speeds with the Edel SMS irons.

More carry distance – Testers picked up an average of 3.39 yards overall and 5.60 yards over their gamers when the heavy weight was located in the best position.

Higher flight and steeper descent – With the weight in the best position, the Edel SMS irons produced peak trajectories that were 6.57 feet higher with a 1.1-degree increase in descent angle. The simple summary for that is better stopping power into greens.

Three for three for Edel. We’re looking good.

Club speed – Testers picked up an average of 3.06 mph of club speed overall.

a photo of Edel SMS irons

3.06 mph? Is that right?

For me, this is a red flag.

A swing speed gain of more than 3 mph with an iron isn’t just intriguing. It’s eye-popping. Frankly, it’s odd. In our Most Wanted iron tests, across an entire test pool, the average between the fastest club and the slowest is typically around 1.5 mph.

So how can we explain that?

The answer could lie in the test protocols and fitting methodology. If, as the fitting process describes, all shots with the gamers were hit first, we’d fully expect speed to increase as the session continues. The reason why we rotate clubs frequently in Most Wanted testing is that it ensures that clubs hit earlier don’t suffer from cold swings, clubs hit late don’t suffer from fatigue and that anything in the middle doesn’t benefit from being in the swing speed sweet spot.

My hunch is that gamers were hit first for all testers which inherently put them at a speed disadvantage. Could the Edel irons be faster?  Sure … But three mph? That’s a stretch. If clubs were rotated, then, this is interesting.

What is impressive (and not tied to speed) is that the Edel irons finished 15 percent closer to the centerline. Granted, we’re only talking about 1.3 yards but you shouldn’t expect to see massive numbers here and I’ll take four feet closer to the hole all day long.

Edel SMS Irons – Final Thoughts

Do the movable weights work? Maybe they do. Maybe they don’t. If that’s something you’d like us to take a closer look at and test for ourselves, tell us in the comment section.

Until then, we can say with certainty that golf equipment’s greatest truism remains. For you, the Edel SMS iron will either be better, worse or the same as what you have now. Edel absolutely believes in its SMS fitting system and I’m absolutely certain it works for somebody. At worst, the weight system is performance-neutral.

If you’re curious, we’d recommend visiting an Edel fitter to try the SMS irons.

Specs, Pricing and Availability

The stock shaft for the Edel SMS iron is the KBS Tour. The stock grip is a Golf Pride Tour Velvet. In both cases, your fitter will determine whether stock is the best answer for you.

Retail price for the Edel SMS irons is $250 per iron. Availability begins July 21.

For more information, visit Edelgolf.com.

For You

For You

News
Apr 25, 2024
Myrtle Beach Classic YouTube Qualifier Is An Interesting Concept That Doesn’t Quite Deliver
Golf Technology
Apr 25, 2024
Skillest is Reimagining Golf Instruction
Golf Bag Carts
Apr 25, 2024
Forum Member Review: Clicgear Model 4.0 Golf Push Cart
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Travis

      2 years ago

      I would love for you to dig deeper into these and maybe have some testers get fit and test them. I got fit for the SMS wedges earlier this year, and they are the real deal. The movable weights have given me a consistent and reliable ball flight, and have improved my 100 yd in game tremendously. I play to a 3, and am seriously considering putting these clubs in my bag, solely based on the results I have seen with the wedges.

      Reply

      P-Dru

      2 years ago

      Great review – they sound like they’d be fun to try. But at that cost per iron getting a free set to try is the only way I would be able to afford it.

      Reply

      Kevin

      2 years ago

      I believe physics dictate ball speed should be significantly higher than club head speed. The above claims of a club head speed increase of 3.06 MPH getting only 3.30 MPH faster ball speed is less than I would expect. The club is only adding 0.08 MPH ball speed.

      Reply

      Richie Hunt

      2 years ago

      These are different from PXG because PXG Gen 4’s have a large weight screw in the middle of the back of the iron. It’s more of a swingweight feature in that you can add a heavier or lighter weight screw to fit your swingweight (i.e. going from D-4 to D-1). .

      Edel SMS irons are more about whether the heaviest weight is more towards the toe, heel or center of the club to fit your swing characteristics. Edel has found that 80% of golfers hit the ball significantly better when the heaviest screw is either on the toe or the heel. Most irons put most of the weight towards the middle of the club, but some designs are more toe heavy and few designs are more heel heavy.. According to Edel, the difference in being properly fit is significant increases in ball speed, accuracy and consistency.

      I own three of their SMS wedges. Once I got the lie angles correct my performance with these wedges on shots from 40-110 yards improved dramatically.

      Just my .02.

      Reply

      Mike

      2 years ago

      Ugly? Hey, I’m not looking for a girlfriend here, I’m not going to be standing up there looking at the back of the clubs, I’m going to be hitting them. That said obviously the price point is way out of 99.99% of most golfers league but It’s always interesting to read about them. I would think that if they were that super fantastic (in terms of adjustability) more pros would be playing them. After all, aren’t they trying to get the best possible edge that they can?

      Reply

      Bob

      2 years ago

      Why would anyone spend $2000 on a set of irons that I think personally are Ugly ! That’s like buying a new car that you don’t like and dealing with it

      Reply

      Momo

      2 years ago

      too pricey. way too pricey

      will not even consider at that price point

      Reply

      NJ Vlitas

      2 years ago

      Love this idea. I think makes incredible products and I would love if you guys did a deeper dive into it. Also, have to say I love the look of the iron.

      Reply

      JR

      2 years ago

      I asked this same question. The irons were PXG 0311T, TM 790, some Mizuno’s and Titleist T200 and some Ping.

      Reply

      Al Copeman

      2 years ago

      Like many on here! Isn’t this exactly what PXG have been doing? I guess the biggest test would be to stick them in the hands of someone who is more erratic with their game and see if the fitted clubs actually help them gain control. It’s a big ask.
      I’ve recently got back into golf following a long absence of injuries. Being quite broken, I got fitted with Mizuno hot metals. They certainly feel comfortable but if I’m falling over on the shot, they won’t be any better than a bargain bucket club. I’m guessing these Edel clubs will be no different.

      Reply

      Rolly Junio

      2 years ago

      Things that make you go “Hmmmmmmmm” … interesting concept they are promoting. I still have not hit any clubs that are “one length”.

      I would be curious to see more of an in depth review for these clubs.

      Reply

      LukeH

      2 years ago

      What about flyers with these? Would be curious to see how that foam is with having those rogue HOT flyers like with PXG’s more forgiving offerings.

      Reply

      Randall Robbins

      2 years ago

      2 clubs would be as much as I spent for a set from Sub 70, and I can’t imagine they would be better, as these are fantastic!

      Reply

      NJ Vlitas

      2 years ago

      Agreed….that is steep price tag. Then again there will be a very large customization part that is baked into that price.

      Reply

      Dr Tee

      2 years ago

      How many times have we heard the claim: “best ever”. Don’t see how just 3 weights can offer the adjustability of multiple weights as seen in some PXG models. Need independent testing and certainly comparison to PXG, Cobra, Titleist, Mizuno, Callaway, and TaylorMade. Agree with many other comments that the thick toppling is a total non-starter.

      Reply

      Mitch Kornfeld

      2 years ago

      I agree with BWIN80. On a good day I can break 100 so it just doesn’t make sense for me to shell out $1,750 or $2,000 for a set of irons.

      Reply

      Bill Coulter

      2 years ago

      At that price I wouldn’t even try them. Oh, and they are PXG ugly!

      Reply

      JohnD

      2 years ago

      You stole my line. At that price I am not interested.

      Reply

      KZ

      2 years ago

      I was just fit for the SMS wedges and the data from those was staggering compared to my off the rack Vokeys in terms of dispersion and consistency. 17.5 yards with my old gamers and 0.9 yards with the SMS. Even having been sold on the wedges, I’m skeptical of how that translates to longer irons in the bag. Interesting though! Would love to test against my gamer irons

      Reply

      tscdave

      2 years ago

      I thought they looked pretty good and would try them out, but I would not shell out that kind of money. Being a 10.0, can’t see these getting me to a 5.0!

      Reply

      Ian

      2 years ago

      Would love to see you guys do a test on these compared to the other irons in this category! These results are impressive, but would believe it more if it had the mygolfspy stamp

      Reply

      Chris Nickel

      2 years ago

      Hmmm….sounds like it might be time for a MyGolfSpy Lab!

      Reply

      Al

      2 years ago

      I’m sure for some golfers these will put some magic back in their bag, but the new “technology” appears to be a mixture of pxg, tm, and Callie existing features.
      The price seems quite premium but I guess there is room in this growing sport for more equipment options

      Reply

      cksurfdude

      2 years ago

      So what I’m wondering about…

      During the fitting process – would it not make sense to test the weight positioning in *every* iron?

      At first glance I’m not sure that the weight setup for my PW would, or should, be the in the same location as for the longest irons in the set…..
      (..but wtf do i know!)

      Reply

      Roger C

      2 years ago

      Most Manufacturers of anything can find a test that will make their product look better, I would like MyGolfSpy to do a more in depth analysis and comparison.

      Reply

      C. Trox

      2 years ago

      Would love to see you guys test these to see if they actually stand up to Edel’s claims.

      Reply

      Tim

      2 years ago

      I admire Edel’s attempt to innovate, but what current players irons were they comparing against. 25 year old Tommy Armour 845’s, Lynx Black Cats….you get the idea. Now if they pick up considerable speed and peak height vs other OEM’s current offerings they might have a story.

      Reply

      Bwin80

      2 years ago

      The price point alone is silly for 95% of golfers, especially in this category. I’ll take my fully customized Sub70 iron set (which is literally 1/2 the cost of these clubs) and compare them all day.

      If you’re handicap is more than a 5, any serious improvement is coming from making your SWING better, your fitness, flexibility, etc…not from tiny, incremental gains from technology. These clubs are “players distance”, meaning they’re targeting the same 5 handicap (or higher) golfer I just described. Why would you spend $2k on a set of clubs that MIGHT make you 2% better on the course, when the $1k savings would be much better spent on lessons and/or fitness?

      Reply

      Sharon Harrington

      2 years ago

      I would like to see more independent testing. I have gone through EDEL putter fitting and purchase and have found their concepts and products reliable.

      Reply

      Stan

      2 years ago

      Completely agree Sharon. I’ve been fitted and own an Edel putter. Total game changer. Now that said, I’d like to see more testing on this concept.

      Reply

      Tom

      2 years ago

      I own three SMS wedges and I immediately hit them better than my previous wedges. The weight system works. I also fitted for a putter and am waiting to receive that. Yeah, I have drunk the Edel kool-aid.

      Nocklaus

      2 years ago

      I can understand higher ballspeed, but higher club head speed would come from overall lighter totalweight or lighter swing weight, which you can change in any club…
      Don´t like the thick topline. Don´t like all that offset. Hope you can bend them, cause they are three degrees more upright than my irons.
      My irons are the beautiful, 30 years old Mizuno Pro MS 11, with copper underlay, and with graphite shafts. You can´t beat the feeling of a good strike with these. Butter…

      Reply

      David

      2 years ago

      I am a big fan of Edel, I have a putter and it is the most stable club in the bag. I would love to hit these irons but there are no fitters within 200 miles of me. I would like to see more on course feedback on these irons.

      Reply

      Nocklaus

      2 years ago

      The only way you could get faster swingspeed is for the club to be lighter or have lighter swingweight, so nothing new there.
      Don´t like the thick topline, don´t like all that offset. I hope you can bend them, cause they are three degrees more upright than my irons.
      My irons are the beautiful 30 year old Mizuno Pro MS 11, with grapfite shafts. One club weaker than the Edel, but you just hit a 7 instead or an 8, it´s the same loft. With the copper underlay you can´t beat the feeling of a good strike!!!

      Reply

      Steve S

      2 years ago

      Count me as a major skeptic. A fitting session only using 5 shots is a joke. You should have at least 10 shots to warm up then 15 to set a baseline. Then hit the edel iron. Then after finding the “ideal” edel, go back and re-hit your gamer. then compare. I’ll bet the “improvements” will be in the data “noise”.

      Reply

      Bob

      2 years ago

      Looks like a PXG clone.

      Reply

      meyersp

      2 years ago

      Woods have had moveable weights for years. I’m wondering if this is more of an evolution in the sport that is now making its way into irons.

      I wonder if they will also add weights to the sole of the irons to further fine tune the cgi. Maybe this already exists.

      Reply

      Dan Janyja

      2 years ago

      $2k for 8 clubs is w-a-y out of my league. They look a little like PXG. In a few years, they may be on 2nd Swing for $50 a club.

      Reply

      Patrice Parent

      2 years ago

      Hey, Tony, Ralph Maltby (Golfworks) has been using this exact concept for a long time…. This is nothing new.

      Reply

      jack

      2 years ago

      If they are not featured in PGA player’s bags, they aren’t worth the time to check out.

      Reply

      Chris V

      2 years ago

      Would love to see how these compare to the other top Players Distance irons in a head to head shootout.

      Reply

      Danpoehler

      2 years ago

      Edel copies TaylorMade’s hollow body & foam, Srixons sole design and PXG’s port weighing system. How boring can you make it!

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    News
    Apr 25, 2024
    Myrtle Beach Classic YouTube Qualifier Is An Interesting Concept That Doesn’t Quite Deliver
    Golf Technology
    Apr 25, 2024
    Skillest is Reimagining Golf Instruction
    Golf Bag Carts
    Apr 25, 2024
    Forum Member Review: Clicgear Model 4.0 Golf Push Cart
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.