I Tested My 5-Year-Old Driver Against New Tech. Here’s The Truth
News

I Tested My 5-Year-Old Driver Against New Tech. Here’s The Truth

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

I Tested My 5-Year-Old Driver Against New Tech. Here’s The Truth

It’s been a while since I went for a driver fitting. My current gamer, the Callaway Mavrik, has been in the bag for about five years. I didn’t buy it after a big demo day or custom build. It was more of a practical decision. Prices had dropped, my old COBRA needed replacing and after hitting a friend’s Mavrik, I figured it was good enough.

And, honestly, it has been.

I’ve never felt like the Mavrik was holding me back. When tested on a simulator, I knew it spun a little too much but on the course, I’ve always managed to adapt and make it work. That’s been my pattern as a golfer. I’ve always been able to make clubs fit my game instead of the other way around.

The fitting process

I went into the fitting with realistic expectations. Unless something was considerably better, I was fully prepared to keep the Mavrik in the bag. The goal wasn’t to chase the latest model for the sake of it. It was to determine if the new technology truly made a difference in my game.

I tested a lot of options: TaylorMade’s Qi35 lineup, the new Titleist GT drivers, Cobra’s DS-Adapt, the PING G440.

From there, we cycled through heads and shafts and it quickly became clear that the right combination could make a bigger difference than I expected.

It’s not just about the yardages

With the Mavrik, I was averaging about 240–248 yards of total distance. The issue wasn’t really distance (although I’ll always take more), it was spin. My numbers hovered around 3,500 rpm, which meant I was losing efficiency and rollout.

With the right head and shaft, those spin rates dropped to nearly 2,500 rpm, settling into a much better window. The launch was slightly lower, the ball speed ticked up and suddenly I was seeing 252–258 yards on average. That’s about 10 yards gained, definitely noticeable.

What I ended up with

The winning setup? The Callaway Elyte Triple Diamond Max (10.5°) paired with a Graphite Design Tour AD GC-6 S shaft.

It wasn’t the shaft I expected to end up with but the feel and performance were undeniable. I’ll save the deeper shaft discussion for another article but the takeaway is simple: the combination worked.

For context, the Elyte Triple Diamond is a more compact, lower-spin head built for precision, while the Elyte Triple Diamond Max keeps much of that performance DNA but adds forgiveness and stability in a full 460cc profile.

I also tried the new shaft in my old Mavrik head but the results were clearly better with this particular driver/shaft combination.

Kraig Brandt, my fitter, summed it up perfectly after one of my last swings of the session: “Once you get used to that thing, it’s really gonna go.” He was right. On the course, as I’ve started to grow comfortable with it, the ball flight is noticeably more penetrating and the distance gains are there.

The technology difference you can feel (after waiting five years to upgrade)

Here’s what stands out after making the switch.

  • Hotter face: The ball comes off differently. Even my kids noticed on day one. “That’s different,” they said after watching a few drives.
  • Ball speed bump: A small but real increase that adds up over 18 holes.
  • Spin control: Lower spin has meant more consistent carry and rollout. My misses are better.
  • Penetrating flight: The new setup doesn’t balloon. It holds its line and falls out of the sky in the right way.

Bottom line

I tend to keep drivers for half a dozen years. I’ve always believed I get plenty out of them during that time period. Would I tell you to rush out and replace your driver right now if you’re playing a Mavrik, like I was? Not necessarily.

The gains are there and they’re real but they aren’t guaranteed. On some swings, I saw five or six yards. But on the ones where I picked up 10 or more, the difference was obvious.

If 10 extra yards puts a 7-iron in your hand instead of a 6-iron, that can absolutely change your scoring opportunities.

So here’s the truth: technology matters. It may not transform your game overnight but with the right fitting, the right shaft and some time to get comfortable, it can make a real difference. And for what it’s worth, here’s my two cents: the Callaway Elyte Triple Diamond line is really good.

img

MyGolfSpy Testing Toolkit

World-class testing requires world-class equipment. This is the gear we trust to help us fulfill our Most Wanted testing.

For You

For You

Masters Tickets Masters Tickets
Golf Talk
Jun 2, 2026
How To Stack The Masters Ticket Lottery In Your Favor
News
Jun 2, 2026
How Long Does It Take To Break In New Golf Shoes?
News
Jun 2, 2026
Can A Mouthpiece Make You A Better Golfer?
Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz

Britt Olizarowicz is a scratch golfer, former teaching professional and one of MyGolfSpy’s leading voices on equipment testing and golf performance. She has spent more than 15 years working at private clubs in New York and Florida and now specializes in translating test data and swing mechanics into practical advice for everyday golfers. Britt began playing at age 7 and has never left the game. When she’s not writing, you’ll find her on the course, playing pickleball, cooking, running or out on the boat with her family.

Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      SkyChief

      8 months ago

      I’m 65 and currently using a $199 Kirkland driver 10.5 draw bias with the stock stiff shaft. I carry that driver 255 on average using a Callaway chrome soft ball. Brought it into a golf galaxy and nothing else could I hit longer or more accurately.

      Reply

      Mark R

      8 months ago

      Was the original Maverick a non-fitted off-the-rack purchase 5 yrs ago? And now comparing it to a 2025 driver with a professional fitting process. I’m calling this an apples to oranges comparison.

      Were the results based on a good fitting or about technology improvement? Could Brit have gained the same results if she were fitted properly 5 yrs ago?

      Reply

      Sean

      8 months ago

      I went for a fitting fairly recently with my Mavrik as the control club. I tried half a dozen different driver heads and 10 or so different shafts. I couldn’t get anything which improved upon my current 5 year old driver.
      Seems like being fitted in the first place is more important than keeping up with the latest cosmetic upgrade, as I really don’t think there has been any appreciable technology gains in the last 5 years in terms of distance or dispersion.

      Reply

      Steve

      8 months ago

      The real message here is you shouldn’t update your clubs every year or even every other year. Get fitted and then enjoy what you have. I’ve got a Ping G430 max which I love. There’s little to be gained by buying the update.

      Reply

      Royce

      8 months ago

      I sure would have more respect for the article and golf spy had you told us what the distance was on that Maverick with the different shaft!
      Kind of feels like you are hiding it.

      Reply

      Dr Tee

      8 months ago

      It’s ALWAYS all about the shaft…

      Reply

      Ted

      8 months ago

      It sure is and what many don’t mention (even in a fitting) that the length of the shaft matters for overall performance. Since having gone to a 43.5 inch shaft my accuracy & consistency have improved immensely. Oh yes and distance is the same…

      Reply

      JL

      8 months ago

      I don’t think this article is about technology. I think it is about proper fitting. I bet had you been fitted for the proper driver 5 years ago, 10 yards wouldn’t have been on the table. I have no doubt there was a head/shaft combination that would have brought your spin rate under 3000 five years ago.

      Drivers have improved (in most cases) over the past 5 years but the technology won’t gain you 4% extra distance unless your current driver doesn’t fit you.

      Reply

      OpMan

      8 months ago

      Complete and utter hogwash.
      There’s a reason why the Tour pros are avoiding the Qi35 for example.
      If drivers are similarly constructed with moveable weights and adjustable hosels, the drivers within the last 5 yeas have not changed at all, not one bit, if you can put the same kind of weights in the same kind of positions in the same loft positions. You can save yourself hundreds of dollars by buying 5 year models and so buy 2 or 3 heads to have backup heads as they will all eventually crack, if you play and hit balls at the range all the time.
      I would understand it if it’s 10 year or so, if it’s used and battered there’ll be drop off in performance and consistency – but if you can find pristine, un-used heads from that long ago, you can still move weights around and adjust lofts and get the same results.
      Also, I recently purchased a set of irons that are labelled 4-PW + 48 degree wedge which are the same as my traditional set which are 3-PW LMAO so yeah my 6 iron is now my 7 iron but they go the same distance LMAO

      Reply

      JBR

      8 months ago

      You are ignoring the key point that she went from a driver that wasn’t properly fitted to one that was.
      LMAO

      Reply

      OpMan

      8 months ago

      No, I’m not. She’s a Pro, a PGA Pro, but also a salesperson via MGS. No way in hell she didn’t get fit that last time.
      Those Pros get whatever they want. She’s just trying to sell through this site of one of the new ones, if you click through here with tagged cookies they get credit for it

      Fake

      8 months ago

      Nice write up. I’m gaming an old Cleveland Launcher HB Turbo. If I were to upgrade, my hope would be for forgiveness more than distance, personally. Gains in distance would just be a bonus.

      Reply

      Stoosher

      8 months ago

      I don’t have a judgment on the club switch. But what annoys me is why the term “gaming” became a thing. When I’m in the fairway trying to decide between a 5 iron or a 4 hybrid, I don’t think “I’ll game my 4 hybrid”. I think “I’ll play 4 hybrid”. I have never once had a friend in a casual round situated from the same distance ask “what club did you game ?”. No, he would ask “what club did I hit” or “what club I played” .
      Where the fuck did “game” a club come from ?

      Reply

      Sean

      8 months ago

      It’s just yet another example of the irritating American bastardisation of English such as saying “like”, “literally”, “my bad”, “hold my beer”, “fun fact”, “be like”, “has joined the chat”, “am I a joke to you?”, “seriously”, “really”, “medalled”, “bested”, “burglarized”, “could care less”, “it is what it is”, “gotten”, “winningest” etc.

      It is vomit inducing, hideous stuff.

      Fake

      8 months ago

      I’ll be honest, it’s a habit I developed coming here. I hadn’t heard it before becoming a regular MGS reader.

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Masters Tickets Masters Tickets
    Golf Talk
    Jun 2, 2026
    How To Stack The Masters Ticket Lottery In Your Favor
    News
    Jun 2, 2026
    How Long Does It Take To Break In New Golf Shoes?
    News
    Jun 2, 2026
    Can A Mouthpiece Make You A Better Golfer?