Jordan Brand Debuts New Golf Shoe. Here’s Why It Will Flop
News

Jordan Brand Debuts New Golf Shoe. Here’s Why It Will Flop

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Jordan Brand Debuts New Golf Shoe. Here’s Why It Will Flop

Today, Jordan Brand announced a new golf shoe. Dubbed the Air Rev, the shoe features a moveable cushion system, among other things, that aim to bring Jordan Brand up to speed in the arms race that is golf footwear.

While I don’t have them in hand yet (I will as soon as I can), after combing through the details, I only have one question.

“WTF is Jordan Brand doing?”

On the surface, everything seems smart and purposeful. Customizable cushion? A custom dial for lockdown and a midfoot strap? Yeah, it all sounds great in theory. But, to me, the Jordan Air Rev is a lot of smoke and mirrors.

And for a reported retail price of $250, you should expect a lot less smoke and mirrors and a whole lot more technology that’s centered in reality.

Here’s what I mean.

1. The strap is unnecessary

The Air Rev has what Jordan Brand is calling Flight Lock technology. A big part of this purported tech is the midfoot strap that goes from the lateral forefoot to the medial instep. It looks cool, sure, but it doesn’t serve an actual purpose, in my opinion.

See that dial that sits atop the shoe? It ain’t BOA. Custom dials without the BOA logo aren’t the same thing. A dial should provide the lockdown that your foot needs. That’s the whole point of running cables through the sides of the shoes. Similar to a lot of shoes in NIKE’s basketball line (circa 2010s), the strap is pretty much just cosmetic.

I may be proven wrong when I put this pair on but I highly doubt the strap is going to add anything in the way of stability or lockdown.

2. The moveable Air Unit sounds cool (in theory)

Reading into the release a bit, Jordan Brand is relying on moveable cushion as the main selling point of this shoe. Namely, an Air Zoom unit in that sits near the strap

The idea is to have the the ability to move it to the lead foot for better energy transfer. Translation: whether you’re left-handed or right-handed, you can switch it around to create the best performance possible.

Other translation: moving parts create more margin for error. Rather than just using a foam midsole or sockliner, having two interchangeable cushions leaves more room for … well, problems. What if the housing for the Air Zoom unit rips or breaks while you’re moving it around?

Again, I haven’t worn them yet. And the idea sounds really, really cool in theory. But, in practice, it may be a totally different experience. Guess we’ll have to wait and see.

3. I don’t have faith in the traction

NIKE is notorious for ditching tried-and-tested spikes and trying to do their own thing. There’s a reason most of the top golf shoes in the game rely on SoftSpikes for traction. The “spikes” on the Air Rev are few and far between and they don’t look nearly as flexible or versatile as the spikes on, say, the NIKE Zoom Victory Tour 4 or the upcoming Zoom Victory Pro 4.

The traction is too similar to the Infinity Tour 2 which was lackluster at best. Seriously, just license the tech from a different company rather than try to make your own, OK?

4. The price is outrageous

I’m not normally one to complain about price. Mostly because I like expensive stuff. But the Jordan Brand Air Rev reportedly retails for $250. You’re kidding, right?

I’ve worn a lot of golf shoes. I’m up to well over 150 different pairs tested and reviewed. None of them reach the $250 price threshold. Most of the top performers, actually, come in at $200 or less.

There’s no reason in hell that a golf shoe from a brand that’s struggled with anything other than their retro models should cost that much money.

Remember, they’re licensing neither the BOA tech nor spikes which can typically drive up the cost.

A $250 flop?

Will the Jordan Brand Air Rev be a success? Depends on your definition. I really hope the “holes” I poked in the shoe are merely because I’m skeptical and that the shoe does perform like one should expect for $250. But I don’t have much faith. And that’s coming from one of the biggest Jordan Brand fans out there.

Too much smoke, not enough fire. I’m afraid Jordan Brand’s legacy and name will carry the shoe more than any of the purported tech or innovation.

All that’s left is to get this pair on my feet.

If you’re interested, the Jordan Brand Air Rev drops on May 14.

For You

For You

Grass League franchises Grass League franchises
Alternate Golf
Jun 11, 2026
Want To Own A Grass League Expansion Franchise? Applications Are Open
News
Jun 11, 2026
FootJoy’s Pro/SL Won Our Men’s Spikeless Test. I Tried The Women’s Model
News
Jun 11, 2026
Can Yippy Pouches Make Golf More Relaxing?
Connor Lindeman

Connor Lindeman

Connor Lindeman

Connor is MyGolfSpy's resident sneakerhead and the authority on all things golf shoe performance. He's tested over 150 different pairs (and counting). When he isn't scrolling Twitter to find his next golf shoe purchase, you can find him at the piano or trying a new dessert place with his wife and daughter. #Lefty

Connor Lindeman

Connor Lindeman

Connor Lindeman

Connor Lindeman

Connor Lindeman





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Pat Maweini

      1 year ago

      how do you hate on something with just “feelings” and “opinions”??? Classic millennial

      Reply

      Connor Lindeman

      1 year ago

      Hey brother. Just sharing initial thoughts based on years of testing hundreds of golf shoes :) Never said I hate it. Just said I don’t think it’ll do well. Happy to eat my words when I get them in hand

      Reply

      Joel

      1 year ago

      How do you write up a review of a pair of shoes without having a full photo of the shoe itself..? Shenanigans, smdh

      Reply

      Mr Ed

      1 year ago

      Nike is a woke joke. Haven’t bought since 2014 and have zero interest now. Nope. Hard pass on BLM supporting nonsense.

      Reply

      AllHailTheOrangeGod

      1 year ago

      …Sounds like Mr Ed prefers that classic jackboot profile. Sieg Heil.

      Reply

      OhWilbur

      1 year ago

      …Sounds like Mr Ed prefers that classic jackboot profile.

      Reply

      MM

      1 year ago

      So much other tech in the shoe you did not mention. I have tested the shoe and have seen top tour pros test it as well and they wanted to put them immediately into play! Testing was with high speed cameras, pressure and torque monitoring. The goal is to not lose any energy when loading properly into the trail foot- 5th metatarsal and inside rear heel. I agree the price is too steep but it will be the best performance shoe on the market.

      Reply

      Brett

      1 year ago

      The price is crazy. But I think your off on the cushioning. The midsole does not change. The cushioning goes INTO the side of the strap. Sounds like a gimmick, but it’s cool that they are starting to try to use zoom air in a different way other than under foot cushion. Agree that they will probably flop though, due to price and non removable spikes at that price.

      Reply

      Connor Lindeman

      1 year ago

      Appreciate the context here. Thank you!

      Reply

      Jim D.

      1 year ago

      If they removed the strap…. and about $75-100 off the cost, I’d consider buying a pair.

      Reply

      MarkM

      1 year ago

      It’ll fail because it’s $250 worth of fugly!

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Grass League franchises Grass League franchises
    Alternate Golf
    Jun 11, 2026
    Want To Own A Grass League Expansion Franchise? Applications Are Open
    News
    Jun 11, 2026
    FootJoy’s Pro/SL Won Our Men’s Spikeless Test. I Tried The Women’s Model
    News
    Jun 11, 2026
    Can Yippy Pouches Make Golf More Relaxing?