First Look: 2025 Mizuno JPX 925 Hot Metal Irons
Irons

First Look: 2025 Mizuno JPX 925 Hot Metal Irons

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

First Look: 2025 Mizuno JPX 925 Hot Metal Irons

“Hot Metal has become a monster,” says Mizuno’s Chris Voshall, Mizuno USA Golf Product and Marketing Manager.

It’s hard to overstate what the introduction of the Hot Metal franchise has meant to Mizuno but to put things in perspective, it’s worth stepping back in time.

For all its prowess in the player’s iron category, there was a good run where Mizuno wasn’t considered a serious player in game-improvement space.

Exhibit A

Mizuno JPX-EZ Irons

That might be my earliest digression ever.

Anyway …

In 2017, Hot Metal’s first year on the market, it accounted for 3.51 percent of dollars spent on irons. Its share has grown steadily with each release.

In 2020, Mizuno had bit more than an 8.5 percent share of the iron market. By 2023, that number had increased to 12.5 percent with 9.71 percent coming from JPX product. Most of it (7.19 percent of the market) was Hot Metal.

In full context, Hot Metal on its own is nearly all of what the totality of Mizuno iron sales used to be.

Mizuno JPX 925 Hot Metal

Even with that success, I’d be inclined to describe the JPX Hot Metal family as a bit of an anomaly in the game-improvement space. Most of what you’ll find in the category are loft-jacked, overtly tech-rich designs that leverage a variety of materials and assorted cream fillings.

By comparison, Mizuno has generally been more sensible about lofts (the JPX 923 Hot Metal HL was among the first to offer weaker lofts) and, while Hot Metal could hold its own performance-wise against nearly anything on the market, Mizuno did what it did without pulling any of the levers competitors use to juice their designs.

While everyone else was using multi-piece, multi-material designs, Mizuno’s JPX Hot Metal relied entirely on single-piece construction.

With the JPX 925 Hot Metal, that changes.

Mizuno JPX 925 Hot Metal – 3 models

The Mizuno JPX 925 Hot Metal family

As with the JPX 923 line, Mizuno is offering three distinct flavors of Hot Metal. You get the middle-of-the-road standard JPX Hot Metal, the more player-centric Hot Metal Pro and the more forgiving, slower swing-friendly Hot Metal HL.

As was the case last time around, the three models share a common platform and common technology. What’s true for one is true for all three. Only the size and specs (length, loft, etc.) differ.

What JPX 925 Hot Metal brings to the table

The summary of JPX 925 benefits includes more consistency across the face (improved forgiveness), more speed from the center and higher launch.

So, with that, let’s look at what Mizuno has done to enhance the performance of its best-selling iron family.

Mizuno JPX 925 Hot Metal

New CORETECH

Your briefest of refreshers: CORETECH is Mizuno’s face technology that brings with it the industry-standard objective of preserving more ball speed over more of the face.

You might recall that JPX 923 Hot Metal was the first time Mizuno used Nickel Chromoly 4335+ as its material of choice. The unwritten rule with any new material is to take a conservative approach to engineering. “We maximized performance with one foot in the make sure it doesn’t break camp,” explains Voshall.

The specific area of concern was what Voshall calls the hinge piece in the lower portion of the JPX 923 Hot Metal face. Erring on the side of caution, Mizuno made the hinge a bit thicker than was perhaps necessary or ideal and, with that, it left some performance on the table.

Two years removed from JPX 923, Mizuno’s confidence in Chromoly 4335+ has grown and it feels it can be more aggressive in how it leverages the materials.

That confidence manifests itself in a new approach to a variable-thickness face design. The updated topology includes areas Mizuno call flex zones that are just 1.2 millimeters thick. Comparable areas of the face were 1.9mm thick last time around. Areas around the perimeter have been thinned as well.

Mizuno JPX 925 Hot Metal

The rule of thumb in face design is that thinner is faster. By thinning both the sweet area and the perimeter, Mizuno is able to deliver a bit more speed.

The variable-thickness concept is also baked into the sole. Thicker areas provide strength where it’s needed while thinner areas work to improve low-face performance compared to JPX 923 Hot Metal. 

All of this is part of the larger objective to provide peak COR (or at least close to it) over as much of the face as possible. Mizuno’s data suggests the new Hot Metal and Hot Metal HL are among the very best in the industry. Warning letters from the USGA would seem to support the claim.

Hot Metal Pro is a bit of an exception among the three. While it still offers plenty of speed, the sweet area isn’t quite as large because of the smaller face.

A bigger face means a bigger trampoline.

JPX 925 Hot Metal Pro

(Secret) tungsten

Even though I’m all but obligated to mention it, tungsten itself is not typically all that notable. Besides, manufacturers are more than happy to note it for me. Seldom is an opportunity missed to stamp “tungsten” on a head. I swear, it feels like a licensing issue where if you use tungsten it has to be credited where everyone can see it.

Getty’s photo rules are less restrictive.

Anyway …

Mizuno’s approach is different in that, in the interest of keeping things as clean as possible, it decided to forgo denoting the tungsten anywhere on the head, but I swear it’s there.

This is all just the really long way to tell you that the JPX 925 4-7 irons feature internal tungsten weights.

Mizuno JPX 925 Hot Metal

The ripple in Mizuno’s implementation is that the weight is explicitly low-ish and forward instead of low and back. True to the Hot Metal philosophy, Mizuno is seeking to increase launch without dropping spin below sensible levels.

Playability is still the goal.

With the addition of tungsten, Mizuno is realizing a couple of other benefits. The first is increased inertia (MOI). The tungsten weight also works to pull the CG closer to the hosel (closer to center) which helps make the new Hot Metal easier to turn over.

If you want to call that a bit of relative draw bias, that’s probably fine.

JPX 925 Hot Metal Pro
JPX 925 Hot Metal Pro
JPX 925 Hot Metal
JPX 925 Hot Metal
JPX 925 Hot Metal HL
JPX 925 Hot Metal HL

Improved feel

Even with its cast models, Mizuno emphasizes feel. So while Nothing Feels Like a Mizuno is generally the stuff of its forged lineup, JPX Hot Metal shouldn’t feel clangy. At the same time, Mizuno doesn’t want to fill Hot Metal with goo to dampen feel entirely.

Much like Marky Mark, Mizuno wants to you feel the vibrations, but in a good way (and with a proper pair of pants on).

When it comes to feel, a good bit of what we experience comes down to geometry. In the case of the JPX 925 Hot Metal, its about the placement of support structures that work to tune sound. Specifically, Mizuno has leveraged a series of ribs to provide rigidity along the topline and a soundbar that runs through the center of the back cavity.

JPX 925 Hot Metal

We’ve covered the science of feel before but the general idea is that if you can successfully target the desirable frequencies for the right duration, golfers are likely to say your irons sound and feel good.

If you’re looking for the specific improvement, it’s that Mizuno has lessened sound pressure in the frequency range from 6,000-9,000 Hz .

And while that feels like the sort of thing that should be on a test, the only thing that matters is that Mizuno says the new JPX Hot Metal feels more solid and hot and less tingy than before.

Looks

All three Mizuno JPX 925 Hot Metal models offer clean lines. You won’t find any ornate multi-color cavity badges. There’s minimal stamping and the only notable change is a small splash of color in the corner of the cavity badge.

The standard Hot Metal has white. Hot Metal Pro is black and Hot Metal HL has blue accents.

The intent isn’t to bling anything out. Mizuno just wanted to make it a bit easier for fitters to find and pull heads during the fitting process.

Mizuno JPX 925 Hot Metal HL

Mizuno JPX 925 Hot Metal – Spec changes

With the 2025 models, Mizuno has made a few spec changes throughout the Hot Metal lineup.

Stronger lofts

With the JPX 925 Hot Metal, the 9-iron and pitching wedge are half a degree stronger. Hot Metal Pro is half a degree stronger in the 7 to gap wedge. And while I suppose it’s technically not a loft change, Mizuno has added a 4-iron to the Hot Metal HL offering and dropped the lob wedge.

It’s a small change meant to bring Hot Metal closer to what loosely passes for industry-standard lofts.

More upright

Similarly, Mizuno has made its stock lie angles .5 degrees more upright across the board. Likewise, irons are .5 more upright. They’re still a bit flatter than most.

To an extent, none of this is particularly important since you can bend Hot Metal anyway you want them.

Mizuno JPX 925 Hot Metal

Longer lengths*

On paper, the JPX 925 Hot Metal iron family is ¼” longer than the previous models. The actual length is the same.

One of the goofy things in the golf equipment industry is proprietary rulers are not uncommon and wi,th that, not everybody agrees on how to measure. Previously, Mizuno used its own ruler. With JPX 925, its measuring the USGA way so while actual lengths are the same, the published numbers have changed.

The exception is the wedges which are actually slightly shorter with JPX 925 Hot Metal.

Speaking of wedges …

In prior iterations of Hot Metal, Mizuno took a universal approach to wedges. There was a single Hot Metal wedge design that split the difference (more or less) between the individual models.

This time around, Hot Metal and Hot Metal HL have distinct wedge offerings. It should make things a bit more seamless for the guy who prefers set-matched wedges

JPX 925 Fli-Hi hybrids

Mizuno JPX 925 Fli-Hi Hybrid

For golfers who need a little extra help, particularly at the long end of the set, Mizuno will again offer Fli-Hi hybrids as direct long-iron replacements. And just like last time, they’re priced the same as the irons they replace.

Designed to be a like-for-like swap, Fli-Hi hybrids will typically be outfitted with the same shaft as the rest of your Hot Metal iron set (though feel free to go in a different direction if you’re so inclined).

Progressive shapes

JPX 925 Fli-Hi Address View

The most noticeable change from prior models is the footprint of the JPX 925 Fli-Hi hybrids. The 925 models are designed to flow better which ultimately means that they get progressively more compact from front to back as you move up in loft. With that, not only do you avoid larger shapes where they’re not necessary but the spin profiles of the Fli-His are now closer to that of the irons they replace.

Speed Bevel sole

JPX 925 Fli-Hi hybrids offer what Mizuno calls “Speed Bevel.” What we’re talking about is a tweak to the leading-edge geometry that creates a bounce surface that helps the club move through the turf. Said another way, Speed Bevel makes Fli-Hi hybrid a bit more friendly to negative attack angle swings associated with iron play.

Mizuno JPX 925 Hot Metal Fli-Hi

Improved Wave Sole

On metalwoods, every manufacturer has technology designed to improve speed on low-face impact. On Fli-Hi, it’s Wave Sole. With the JPX 925 Fli-Hi, Mizuno has improved Wave Sole performance to preserve more speed on low impact.

Finally, Mizuno has made a small cosmetic change to the score lines to better frame the ball at address.

JPX 925 Fli-Hi options

JPX 925 Fli-Hi hybrids are available in four lofts: 19, 22, 25 and 28 degrees. The specific iron each replaces depends on which Hot Metal set you’re sliding it into but, broadly, think of Fli-Hi as an option to replace anything from a 4- to 7-iron. That gives you plenty of flexibility to take Fli-Hi deep into your set and not pay through the nose for the privilege.

Mizuno JPX 925 Hot Metal and Fli-Hi specs, pricing and availability

Mizuno JPX 925 Hot Metal Stock Shafts

The stock shafts for the JPX 925 Hot Metal are the Nippon NS Pro 950 NEO (steel) and UST Recoil Dart ESX (graphite). The stock grip is the Lamkin UT+.

Stock shaft offerings for the JPX 925 Hot Metal Pro are the Dynamic Gold 105 (steel) and Mitsubishi MMT (graphite). The stock grip is the Lamkin UTX+ (cord).

The stock shaft offerings for the JPX 925 Hot Metal HL are the Dynamic Gold 95 (steel) and UST Recoil Dart ESX (graphite). The stock grip is the Lamkin UT+.

The stock shaft for the JPX Fli-Hi is the UST Recoil Dart ESX, though the expectation is that most golfers will choose to match their iron shafts. The stock grip is the Lamkin UT+.

Mizuno JPX 925 Hot Metal irons are available in right- and left-handed. Left-handed options in the JPX 925 Fli-Hi hybrid are limited to 19 and 22 degrees

Retail price for the everything in the JPX 925 Hot Metal family (including Fli-Hi) is $150 per club.

Pre-sale for the Mizuno JPX 925 Hot Metal begins Sept. 5. Full retail available starts Sept. 19.

For more information, visit Mizunogolf.com.

For You

For You

Buyer's Guide
Jun 12, 2026
Best Putters of 2026 (Test Data From 75+ Putters)
News
Jun 12, 2026
I’ve Been Calling This the Best Golf Hat for Years. Now It’s Even Better.
We Tried It
Jun 12, 2026
I Put Amazon’s $199 Golf Set Up Against A Better Beginner Set
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Jason S

      2 years ago

      I love the “assorted cream fillings” comment! I laughed way too much at that comment.
      Not a big fan of the look of rear badging of the new 925’s compared to my 923’s. But it’s for a reason, so I can’t argue the usage. I’ll be curious to see the new Forged and Tour models and how they compare.

      Reply

      mackdaddy9

      2 years ago

      Looks like another amazing group of irons from Mizuno.

      Reply

      Kuso

      2 years ago

      I think the shapes are great, the top lines look awesome, very clean. I know they are thick compared to their Tour clubs, these don’t look that bad as they seem to be smoothed out.
      Might use a couple of these as long irons to replace my aging driving irons from 7 years ago

      Reply

      Darren Jeffries

      2 years ago

      Are they about to release the 925 Tour?

      Reply

      PJ

      2 years ago

      I was told there will be no tour model but there will be a forged model

      Reply

      Marc Plante

      2 years ago

      Loved the forged feel when I tested the 923s, but needed the Pro distance (I’m getting old). Loving my new irons

      DaniloP

      2 years ago

      I’ve gamed 921 HMP with steelfibers and have loved them. Long irons have been a godsend. However future loft jacking keeps me concerned for scoring irons in the future, actually considering the forged for my next set.

      Reply

      atxrich

      2 years ago

      I’m always interested in what Mizuno brings out. I don’t expect too much in terms of improvements over the already powerful JPX923 HM. As far as looks/shelf appeal, I much prefer the 923’s. I suspect the thicker perimeter surrounding the back badge on these 925’s is to improve stability and ball speed consistency across the face, but it looks like a much chunkier GI iron.

      Reply

      Jim

      2 years ago

      I agree with your thoughts on the thicker perimeter look, the 923s are better looking (straighter lines as well instead of this angled look). But I guess we’ll see what they look like in person. I’m more discouraged by the price increase over the 923s. I was thinking of getting a set but a back injury has limited my ability to get fitted properly and now I may have to go for the 925s instead and the increased price is unfortunate.

      Reply

      WYBob

      2 years ago

      Curious as to what happened to the JPX 92x Forged and JPX 92x Tour irons. Are they discontinued or a separate and later release?

      Reply

      BobJ22

      2 years ago

      In the 923’s the tour and the forged models were released in the spring after the HM models, I’ve seen unsubstantiated rumors they are going to be replaced by something else but nothing is confirmed and I personally doubt that Mizuno would do away with their most popular model on the PGA tour

      Reply

      Bonnie Barker

      2 years ago

      How much can you flatten each model? I need ‘considerable’ flat. Thanks!

      Reply

      Max R

      2 years ago

      My 919 Forged seem significantly weaker than the current Hot Metal version. While I understand that distance is a big marketing-seller, I am a bit shocked at the increased “strength “ of the lofts on the Hot Metal Pro series. My 919 Forged (not Hot Metal) for my 7-iron is 34 degrees while its cousin is now 28. Yes, different models but OMG.

      Reply

      Doug Mieth

      2 years ago

      I have used mizuno irons for many years. Starting with the JPX-800. To the JPX900 Hot Metal, which I loved, now to the JPX 923 Hot Metal HL. I’ve gotten older. They always feel great when I hit them. Never let me down. I’ve tried other brands trying to find something better, but have always stayed with Mizuno.

      Reply

      Dr Tee

      2 years ago

      How do these stack up compared to the Pro 245’s, Mizuno’s hollow body players distance iron ? Seems to me a lot of overlap (redundancy).

      Reply

      atxrich

      2 years ago

      It’s dependent on the player making that decision. The JPX has more game improvement tech where the Mizuno Pro removes some of those features in the name of improved aesthetics, feel, and ability to shot shape.

      I gamed the JPX 923 HMP for a little while. And while I enjoyed playing them, I found the mid-long irons too strong which created gaps in the short end of my bag and not large enough yardage gaps at the long end.

      I transitioned to the Pro 245 and it checked all the boxes more me– better gapping with more compact and player-like looks. You do give up some forgiveness compared the JPX, but I was willing to make that compromise. Having said that there is enough forgiveness in the mid-long irons that a mid-handicapper could play these.

      Reply

      Joe

      2 years ago

      As a diehard Mizuno irons player, these look interesting. A thinner face might be the trick. I hope Mizuno has fixed their production times, as that has always been their Achilles heel. I am not sure I love the backside of the club and will be interested to see some actual data numbers on these before upgrading my 923HMs. What that being said, I believe it’s extremely hard to beat Mizuno irons.

      Reply

      Kyle Gordon

      2 years ago

      I would absolutely love to try the 925’s I just bought the hot metal 923 at the beginning of this season and couldn’t be happier with my decision, I would just be curious too see the difference from the 923 to the 925’s

      Reply

      atxrich

      2 years ago

      If I’d have to venture a guess, there could be 1-2 mph ball speed improvement if anything which theoretically results in 3-6 more yards. YouTube is about to get flooded with “reviews” after the embargo lift so you can be the judge.

      Jason black

      2 years ago

      Just bought the 923 HMP this spring and they are amazing. Would be hard to trade into anything at this point as it has taken the summer to dial in the distances. Was fit by a mizuno rep at my club and he made me a customer for life! Highly recommend!

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Buyer's Guide
    Jun 12, 2026
    Best Putters of 2026 (Test Data From 75+ Putters)
    News
    Jun 12, 2026
    I’ve Been Calling This the Best Golf Hat for Years. Now It’s Even Better.
    We Tried It
    Jun 12, 2026
    I Put Amazon’s $199 Golf Set Up Against A Better Beginner Set