Forum Member Review: Callaway White Box Golf Balls
Partner Content

Forum Member Review: Callaway White Box Golf Balls

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Forum Member Review: Callaway White Box Golf Balls

The Callaway White Box Testing Opportunity

Callaway has completely revamped their golf ball lineup with the new Chrome Tour series. This revamp shifts focus and looks to target the better players who may have not taken Callaway golf balls as seriously as they might have in the past.

The new Chrome Soft remains in the lineup. However, the focus for this testing opportunity is on the all-new Chrome Tour, which replaces the previously named Chrome Soft X LS and the Chrome Tour X that replaces the prior general Chrome Soft X

We selected 40 golfers to test, review, keep and report back to us on their findings of these new Callaway golf balls. Each tester received a dozen white box golf balls: six Callaway Chrome Tour and six Callaway Chrome Tour X

Testers were asked to play these golf balls and provide feedback to us on the Forum to highlight certain performance aspects.

About The Testing Group

Age Ranges

As with all MyGolfSpy Forum tests, we aim to get a wide variety of testers to make the reviews relevant to you, the real golfer. This testing opportunity was no different with testers’ ages ranging from 14 to mid 70s.

We included golfers who frequently hit the links to ensure these new golf balls got tested as thoroughly as possible!

Handicap Range

For this Forum Member Review of Callaway white box golf balls, a focus was placed on the “better golfer”, meaning testers generally had lower handicaps. While these balls are not exclusively intended for low handicap golfers, handicaps for this group of testers was between +4 and 10.5.

Golf Ball Preferences

We asked our testers what brand of golf ball they normally play. Titleist led the way, which is not a huge surprise. Callaway and TaylorMade users were about equal and a handful used other brands (Srixon, Bridgestone and more). This variety helped give us a broad range of perspectives.

What Testers Found: Performance

Performance:

  • Both balls received praise for their performance around the green, good spin and overall feel.

Feel and Softness:

  • Others preferred the Chrome Tour versus the Tour X.
  • The Chrome Tour X was generally appreciated for its feel, although some noted a bit too much spin, particularly off the tee. 
  • Generally, those who liked a firmer golf ball preferred the Chrome Tour X. 

Comparisons with Other Brands:

  • Comparisons were made with other popular golf ball brands like Titleist and TaylorMade.
  • Many testers felt the Chrome Tour could compete with or even surpass their current balls in terms of distance, performance and durability.

Triple Track Alignment:

  • The Triple Track alignment feature received positive comments, particularly for putting and aiming off the tee.

Durability:

Direct From The Testers

While it is great to get a summary of the testing group’s feedback, often it is best to get the direct quotes. In the end many of the testers are just like you or me. What they say certainly relates to us more than what the companies themselves can say. These testers have no skin in the game and just want to provide open and honest feedback to help you make better informed purchase decisions. Here is what they had to say.

Tester Quotes:

“The Chrome Tour and Chrome Tour X are on my short list of balls I would consider gaming throughout the year. I do believe the Chrome Tour specifically will help improve my game off the tee and around the green. To me, this ball is a big leap into the premium golf ball market.”

“The Chrome Tour X is an exceptional ball. I love it for iron interaction and performs well with the driver. The more I play this ball the more I like it. The liveliness off the club face is exciting to feel and the results are pleasing.”

“Loved both balls – the Chrome Tour X gave me the most distance – as an aging golfer, distance off the tee translates to lower scores.”

“I was surprised by how much I preferred the Chrome Tour X to my usual Chrome Soft Truvis or Pro V1x balls, but the Tour X was the best ball that I have tried so far. I compared the Chrome Tour, Tour X and Bridgestone BX balls for a few rounds and the Chrome Tour X was the clear winner”

Pretty glowing reviews. Were there any downsides? Of course. Not all golf balls will work for all golfers, just like not all golf clubs will work for all golfers. That being said, the golfers who tested these and didn’t love them still came away impressed by the performance. A few found small issues or felt one or the other to be a little too soft or too firm. However, as most of us are aware, feel is a very golfer-dependent trait.

Final Verdict

After the testing was completed, what were the general findings? Would our testers be making the switch to the new Chrome Tour and Tour X, away from their gamers? Let’s find out. 

Overall Impression:

  • Overall, testers expressed satisfaction and excitement about the Chrome Tour and Chrome Tour X.
  • The feedback was positive, highlighting significant improvements over previous Callaway ball models.
  • The Chrome Tour was considered a significant leap into the premium golf ball market for Callaway.

Potential Concerns:

  • Some concerns were raised about excessive spin, especially with the Tour X, leading to shots backing up significantly.
  • Feel for some golfers was too firm or too soft and they preferred their gamers. 

Final Thoughts:

  • Testers acknowledged improvements in the new Chrome series compared to previous generations.
  • The Chrome Tour X was perceived as a potential upgrade for some, while others found it to be a better fit for their game.
  • The positive performance and feedback may influence purchasing decisions.

Tester Quotes

“Chrome Tour X is a great ball and I look forward to playing it more in the future.”

“I will certainly be a purchaser of the Chrome Tour ball. With everything else being somewhat equal I really like the way the ball looks on the tee and fairways with hex pattern.”

“Chrome Tour does everything I want a golf ball to do. I will be changing to this ball this year.”

This was a great testing opportunity that provided a lot of valuable data, information and feedback on the new Callaway Chrome Tour series of golf balls. 

While not every tester will be making the switch, a significant majority will, having found gains with the new Callaway balls. The goal for Callaway was to make significant strides in improving their premium golf ball lineup. Based on the results from our testers, it is pretty clear to say they have accomplished this. 

View the full Forum Member Review of Callaway White Box Golf Balls here.

For You

For You

Irons
Apr 24, 2024
PXG Irons: Model By Model
Putters
Apr 23, 2024
PING 2024 Putter Line Extension
News
Apr 23, 2024
Nelly Korda Deserves Her Caitlin Clark Moment, So Why Isn’t She Getting It?
Jamie Danbrook

Jamie Danbrook

Jamie Danbrook

Jamie is the MyGolfSpy Forum Director. A Canadian living in Switzerland can often be found posting on the forum under the username GolfSpy_APH. When not on the forum he can be found on the course, or with his wife, two kids and three dogs hiking and exploring. He prides himself in being a lefty golfer and is still in search of his elusive first hole in one.

Jamie Danbrook

Jamie Danbrook

Jamie Danbrook

Is a $100 Golf Simulator Any Good?
Apr 25, 2024 | 3 Comments
PXG Irons: Model By Model
Apr 24, 2024 | 4 Comments
Testers Wanted: Shot Scope V5
Apr 21, 2024 | 0 Comments
Testers Wanted: Toura Golf Club Build Test
Apr 20, 2024 | 0 Comments
Jamie Danbrook

Jamie Danbrook

Jamie Danbrook





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      HikingMike

      1 month ago

      Well done, MGS testers, and Jamie. I feel even better about the couple freebie Chrome Tours they gave me at a Callaway Paradym Ai Smoke fitting :) I’ll consider them more now after kind of off and on liking/disliking Chrome Softs.

      Reply

      Jimmy

      1 month ago

      A couple of things to keep in mind when reading this:

      1) this is an ad. The feedback shown is in all likelihood curated by Callaway or by someone at MGS with Callaway’s commercial interests in mind
      2) the plural of anecdote is not data

      Reply

      elvis14

      1 month ago

      Wow that’s the opposite of what MGS does. Pretty serious condemnation. Please show us the source of your information.

      Reply

      Jimmy

      1 month ago

      The tag on the “article” is Partner Content, which is a euphemism for paid advertisement.

      Yeah, it used to be the opposite of what MGS does, which is the sad part.

      Bobby

      1 month ago

      Nope Jimmy, I was a tester on this one… not an ad. I took 4 or 5 weeks to run these balls through the gauntlet and came out of the other end with a conclusion that was all my opinion and not influenced at all by Callaway. Ask me anything, I’ll be happy to give you my 100% honest feedback.

      Reply

      Jimmy

      1 month ago

      Bob, it’s a little concerning that MGS apparently didn’t disclose to you that this testing was for an ad, but they’re not going to put the Partner Content label on a post that wasn’t paid-for by the “partner.” That label is how they disclose ads to readers.

      I don’t think you were influenced, personally. I think the person who compiled feedback from 40+ pages of scattered forum posts had a monetary incentive to paint the results in a positive light.

      And the issue isn’t necessarily that I know for sure that MGS’s opinions are influenced by these paid spots. I like the writers who work here and think they’re good people. It’s that we can’t possibly know that their opinions weren’t shaped by sponsors in these cases.

      alex

      1 month ago

      Glad to hear durability is good. The Chrome Soft X was a great ball, but much easier for me to scuff than a Pro V1x.

      Reply

      Bobby

      1 month ago

      I would say it’s on par durability-wise with other Urethane cover balls. I did notice some quick surface wear and will admit that new grooves will cut these up. But I also play ProV1’s and they are equal to that IMHO.

      Reply

      Scott Nelson

      1 month ago

      Final write-up was a good summary of all of our feedback. Callaway finally has a ball to compete with the ProV1 series. Enjoyed this opportunity to test this ball, especially as I’m always looking for something new for the charity tournament I put on. I’ve been loading up on the Chrome Tour balls with the B3/G1 free deal for the tournament, so will “introduce” them to even more players this summer.

      Reply

      Jim D

      1 month ago

      Great overview! It was fun to participate in testing! Hope to be chosen again in the near future.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Irons
    Apr 24, 2024
    PXG Irons: Model By Model
    Putters
    Apr 23, 2024
    PING 2024 Putter Line Extension
    News
    Apr 23, 2024
    Nelly Korda Deserves Her Caitlin Clark Moment, So Why Isn’t She Getting It?
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.