A few years ago, few golfers had even heard of PAYNTR.
Today, the company has become one of the fastest-rising brands in golf footwear, fueled by strong performances in independent testing, increased visibility across the game and a growing list of tour professionals putting their trust in the brand. Players such as Jason Day, Min Woo Lee, Sam Burns and Justin Rose have helped put PAYNTR on golf’s raar while repeated appearances across MyGolfSpy testing and coverage amplified the conversation.
The real question is whether the same shoes trusted by elite players can deliver for everyday golfers.
That’s where the MyGolfSpy Forum comes in.
Five members recently spent several weeks testing the PAYNTR Reserve Classic Tour RS in real-world conditions. Collectively, they logged more than 100 miles walking golf courses, enduring rain, mud, summer heat, range sessions, travel golf, and dozens of rounds.
The result wasn’t unanimous.
It was something better.
It was honest.
EasyPutter: The Reluctant Believer
If there was one tester least likely to hand out praise without reservation, it was EasyPutter.
In fact, he admitted as much at the beginning of his review.
“I don’t like a test where I don’t get to point out something as missing, could be better, or something that happened the OEM should know about.”
And yet after 23 days, 10 rounds of golf, and countless hours wearing the shoes on and off the course, he found himself in unfamiliar territory.
“The fit is remarkable to feel roomy without any hint of it slipping on my foot.”
Even more telling:
“If I had not known better, I would have thought the shoe was tailor-made for my foot.”
Over the course of testing, EasyPutter encountered wet fairways, muddy conditions, sand, steep slopes, and long days on his feet. The shoe consistently delivered.
“The shoe remained dry inside despite many wet play days.”
And:
“Grip and holding on slopes was excellent.”
Perhaps the highest compliment he could offer was the simplest.
“The shoe is comfortable enough to forget they are on the feet.”
By the end of the test, the reviewer who actively searches for shortcomings found himself struggling to identify one.
“The Good – Everything is good is not a good answer but it is my honest answer.”
His conclusion left little room for interpretation.
“Buy these shoes for your next pair of golf shoes.”
Neb: Putting Them Through the Wringer
If EasyPutter supplied the emotional story, Neb supplied the data.
During the review period, Neb logged approximately 30 hours in the shoes across six range sessions, six rounds, and more than 22 miles walked. His first impression proved prophetic.
“The leather used is soft and supple and hints that there will not be an extended break in period.”
Weeks later, his assessment hadn’t changed.
“The comfort of the sole remains as it did the first time I put the shoes on.”
Like several testers, Neb praised the balance between waterproof protection and breathability.
“I have no breathability concerns as the shoes did not leave me with sweaty feet.”
When rain arrived, the shoes continued to impress.
“Despite walking through quite a bit of standing water, my feet were warm and dry as when the round began.”
The strongest endorsement came when Neb attempted to summarize the on-course experience.
“The best compliment I can pay these shoes, from an on-course standpoint, is that I rarely notice I am wearing them.”
His final verdict?
“These shoes will be my spiked pair of golf shoes moving forward. They are phenomenal.”
MGoBlue100: The Honest Counterpoint
One of the strengths of Forum Member Testing is that not every golfer experiences equipment the same way. MGoBlue100 provided exactly that perspective. His test began with a golf trip to Ireland where he walked five consecutive rounds totaling more than 40 miles.
That’s a demanding break-in process for any golf shoe.
The positives showed up immediately.
“The traction and stability of the shoes is top notch.”
And:
“From a playability standpoint, these are the equal of any golf shoe on the market.”
He also praised the shoe’s breathability and lightweight construction.
“With all the walking, I never felt like I had on boots or heavy shoes.”
But unlike the other testers, fit became an issue.
As a golfer with a particularly narrow foot, he struggled with the shape of the shoe.
“The Bad is the fit, at least for me.”
Still, even as the lowest scorer in the group, he repeatedly praised the overall quality.
“This is a really good spiked golf shoe.”
And perhaps the most balanced conclusion of the entire test:
“I don’t think you’ll be disappointed in any way. You just may not be blown away.”
Not every shoe fits every golfer. That’s exactly the kind of honest feedback that makes Forum testing valuable.
Swing Pastor: Winning Over a Lifelong FootJoy Golfer
Few endorsements carry more weight than changing a golfer’s habits. Swing Pastor entered the test as a longtime FootJoy loyalist. By the end, that loyalty had shifted. After more than 60 hours of wear, four rounds, and multiple walking rounds, his conclusion was emphatic.
“I can honestly say these are the best shoes I’ve ever worn.”
The premium feel stood out immediately.
“Premium feel, nice firm sole, laces easy to pull, feels like a much more expensive shoe.”
Durability impressed him just as much.
“After two hard weeks I can barely tell that they’ve been worn.”
And:
“They are still very sturdy and stable and have maintained the shape.”
The styling also won him over.
“Modern but with a classic touch.”
But perhaps the most revealing quote came when he compared PAYNTR directly to the shoes he’d trusted for years.
“I have been a FJ guy since I was young.”
Not anymore.
“These are my go to’s now.”
For golfers familiar with the premium footwear market, this comparison stood out.
“I spend $250 on FJ Classics and these are a far better shoe for my money.”
ATX Gear Nerd: Looking Toward the Future
Every test group seems to have an equipment junkie. For this test, that golfer was ATX Gear Nerd. As someone who admits to being picky about golf gear and footwear, his praise carried significant weight.
He immediately appreciated the details.
“They are very good looking shoes.”
And:
“Leather is extremely soft and do not expect much if any time needed to break in.”
Like MGoBlue100, he noted the wider toe box.
“The toe box is just a little too wide for me.”
But unlike many shoes that sacrifice security for room, Payntr managed to hold his foot in place.
“Payntr absolutely nailed the heel shape.”
Performance remained a constant theme throughout his review.
“These just don’t slip, ever.”
And after testing them in rain, heat, walking rounds, and riding rounds:
“Honestly, hard to beat.”
Then came perhaps the strongest statement of the entire test.
“These are special shoes.”
Followed immediately by:
“I genuinely think Payntr is going to set the standard for golf footwear moving forward.”
His buying recommendation couldn’t have been clearer.
“If you need new shoes (or want) I would 10000% recommend these.”
And finally:
“Don’t look at any other shoes and just buy these.”
The Bigger Picture
The purpose of Forum Member Testing isn’t to create marketing copy. It’s to discover what happens when real golfers spend real time with real products. In this case, five golfers arrived with different expectations, different swing styles, different foot shapes, and different footwear preferences.
One became a convert from FootJoy.
One called them “phenomenal.”
One believes PAYNTR may set the future standard for golf footwear.
And even the toughest grader in the group still called them a really good golf shoe.
For a company that barely registered on most golfers’ radar a few years ago, PAYNTR now is in a remarkable situation. More importantly, it’s a reminder that their rise isn’t being driven solely by tour players. It’s being driven by golfers who try the shoes and don’t want to take them off.
Chris Ammann
54 minutes ago
I wear Hokas almost all the time except for playing golf. My feet get very stiff after a round of golf in golf shoes and my heels hurt. Can anyone speak to the after round comfort? Does the cushioning stand up?