Snell MTB Prime and MTB Prime X Golf Balls
Golf Balls

Snell MTB Prime and MTB Prime X Golf Balls

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Snell MTB Prime and MTB Prime X Golf Balls

It’s next to impossible to identify the current top-selling direct-to-consumer golf ball brand but I don’t think it’s a stretch to suggest it was Snell Golf that was first to effectively reach the masses with the message that golfers don’t need to pay big OEM prices for quality performance golf balls.

Spoiler alert: That’s still true with the new Snell MTB Prime and MTB Prime X golf balls. We’ll get to those in a minute but feel free to skip ahead if you’re not interested in how we got here.

Kicking in the door for DTC ball brands

The new for 2023 Snell Golf MTB Prime and MTB Prime X golf balls

Dean Snell’s pedigree as a co-inventor of the Pro V1 and numerous TaylorMade golf ball technologies brought credibility that others in the DTC space lacked–and the market was ready.

Timing, as they say, is everything. “We stepped into it at a decent time and created a niche,” says Snell.

Whether Snell is the largest DTC brand, I can’t say. That it’s beloved by many golfers for its quality products and sensible prices is inarguable.

It’s the reason Snell’s golf business was thriving, growing 30-40 percent per year. Until COVID hit and absolutely kicked Snell Golf’s ass.

Golf’s Rare Covid Victim

The Snell MTB Prime golf ball

While many golf businesses thrived during the pandemic, Snell Golf took a hit and a hard one. It’s not that demand wasn’t there (everybody had demand) but between supply chain issues (most notably with ionomer, the material used in the mantle layers of urethane-covered balls) and TaylorMade’s acquisition of Nassau Golf, the factory that produced Snell MTB and MTB X, Snell Golf didn’t have much of anything to sell.

If you’ve tried to order Snell balls lately, chances are you haven’t had much luck. A shipment of Snell balls was supposed to arrive in June 2021. It didn’t arrive until December, which in some respects was fortunate. If the balls had arrived on time, it’s likely Snell wouldn’t have had any inventory for all of 2022.

Snell MTB Prime X golf balls

Despite the near-total lack of inventory, by some small measure, I supposey ou could argue Snell has been lucky.

Unlike several others, it wasn’t kicked out of TaylorMade Korea (formerly Nassau) and Dean hasn’t closed the book on having Snell Golf balls produced by TaylorMade in the future.

Snell says the communication with TaylorMade has been excellent but the realities of the market are such that TaylorMade has to choose between making enough of its own product to satisfy demand or keeping Snell fully stocked.

Understandably, it chose itself. No hard feelings on Snell’s end.

The situation hasn’t been ideal but, in the long term, it may prove to be a blessing.

A Snell Golf Reset

The Snell MTB Prime golf ball

The unwanted downtime has provided Snell with an opportunity to reset and rebrand.

The reset involves Dean Snell doing new material research for the first time since stepping out on his own. It also includes working to qualify new factories so his company won’t be at the mercy of a single supplier and the supply chain will be less of a concern moving forward.

“I lived that nightmare and it hasn’t been fun,” says Snell, “but it gave us a chance to step out, figure out what we are going to do and how we are going to do it.”  

The process of developing two new balls hasn’t been easy and the product Snell has received from some factories hasn’t always met Snell’s quality standards. “They made some stuff for us that’s just awful.”

a close up of the Snell MTB Prime golf ball

To ensure the product is what Snell fans expect, Dean has worked extensively with his factories to develop and implement processes, procedures and reports to ensure higher quality standards moving forward.

It has taken effort, to say the least.

To date, Snell has qualified two factories (the MTB Prime and Prime X are produced in different facilities) and the company is close to qualifying two more.

Quality, capacity and, to an extent, redundancy are all part of Snell’s plans moving forward.

Short version: Dean hopes to never run out of golf balls again.

Better for Everyone

A Snell MTB Prime X golf ball in a compression gauge

Dean declined to be specific about whom is making the Snell MTB Prime and MTB Prime X but it’s a safe assumption that the factories produce balls for other DTC brands. With that, the likelihood is that processes and procedures Dean helped implement at his factories will ultimately benefit his competitors and, by extension, consumers.

That’s fine with Dean Snell. “We’re not trying to take over the world of golf balls.” If golfers end up with a higher quality product because of it, Snell sees that as a win.

Rebranding

A closeup of the new Snell Golf logo

The first thing you’ll notice about the Snell MTB Prime and MTB Prime X golf balls is the new logo. There are plenty of things golfers love about Snell Golf but the logo hasn’t often been one of them.

Snell believes the new logo is a bit more aggressive and has a younger vibe to it.

“I’ve always felt the logo thing was overblown a bit but it’s not lost on me that some brands are purchased almost exclusively because of their logos. Regardless, the rebrand is an improvement.”

The packaging has been updated as well. Again, simple, but also cleaner and more modern.

Snell MTB Prime Golf Balls – Two Models              

The core of a Snell MTB Prime golf ball

The Snell Golf MTB Prime lineup will launch with two models. While that part is familiar to fans of the Snell brand, part of the objective for the MTB Prime family was to create more separation between balls and make it easier for golfers to identify the Snell model that is right for them.

Both the MTB Prime and MTB Prime X are three-piece balls. They’re differentiated by trajectory, spin and feel.

According to Snell, both MTB Prime models feature low spin off the driver. The standard MTB Prime will fly lower and spin a bit more off the irons than the X. It’s the softer of the two balls with early measurements on our gauge suggesting low- to mid-80s compression.

The firmer X is designed to fly higher with moderate spin in the iron game. Ballpark compression is in the mid-90s on our gauge.

As is practically mandatory, Snell says both models offer outstanding greenside performance.

332 Spin-Matched Dimples

A closeup of a Snell MTB Prime X golf ball

While both models feature a 332-dimple pattern that’s not in and of itself proprietary to Snell, Dean made some changes to the dimple depth and edge angles to create what he calls a spin-matched dimple pattern. The idea is to tune the aerodynamics to better optimize the trajectory to match the spin characteristics of each model.

It’s what every golf ball brand should do but not what every golf ball brand does.

In what amounts to a departure from the previous models, the Snell MTB Prime and MTB Prime X covers are TPU injection molded as opposed to cast. Dean Snell is a long-time advocate of cast urethane covers but the reality is that there are only a few factories in the world capable of producing them. The change was likely one of necessity. Most golfers won’t notice a difference.

Snell MTB Prime – Different Colored Covers

Snell MTB Prime and MTB Prime X golf balls with core cutaways

Cover pigments vary slightly between the balls as well and that’s by design. The MTB Prime is a cooler (softer) white while the MTB Prime X has an ever-so-slightly warmer hue. The goal is to use slight color variation to convey the feel of the golf ball. It’s an odd thing but, yeah, I’d say the X looks firmer, for whatever that’s worth.

Snell MTB Prime – Where They’re Made

The core of a Snell MTB Prime X golf ball

As noted, the MTB Prime and MTB Prime X are produced by different factories. We haven’t identified the factories yet but we do know that standard MTB Prime is coming out of China while the MTB Prime X is made in Taiwan.

It’s certainly going to be interesting to see if our Ball Lab testing reveals any significant quality differences between the two.

Snell MTB Prime – Pricing and Availability

sleeves of the Snell MTB Prime Golf Ball

Given all the talk of inflation and rising OEM prices, you might expect small brands to follow suit. That’s not happening at Snell. From Day 1, the company’s mission was to improve golf and give back to the consumer who pays for golf balls.

That hasn’t changed.

The MTB Prime and MTB Prime X Golf balls are $32.99 a dozen. Five-packs of the MTB Prime and MTB Prime X will sell for $149.95 (29.99/dozen).

The company is in the final stages of tweaking the color before submitting to the USGA but yellow versions will be added this summer.

Asked if there was anything else he’d like to add, Dean Snell’s final words were, “It’s good to be back.”

The Snell MTB and MTB X are available for pre-order now. The new balls are expected to ship to golfers the first half of the month.

For more information, visit SnellGolf.com.

For You

For You

News
Apr 25, 2024
Myrtle Beach Classic YouTube Qualifier Is An Interesting Concept That Doesn’t Quite Deliver
Golf Technology
Apr 25, 2024
Skillest is Reimagining Golf Instruction
Golf Bag Carts
Apr 25, 2024
Forum Member Review: Clicgear Model 4.0 Golf Push Cart
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Arnold S

      7 months ago

      I’ve been playing the Prime X for months now. They are nowhere close to the MTB Black which is a superb ball that I played for years. Maybe it was a bad batch. I am a single digit handicap and within my limitations, I just found these balls to be too high in performance variance. Wedge spin was good and predictable. Compression off an iron was fine. But off the tee, very different. Much shorter off the tee. A couple of balls flew with some bizarre spin which suggested to me that the core was off center. In addition to many normal rounds, I played a practice round, using the new X, MTB-X and a Bridgestone BX. The Prime X underperformed the other two. I should add that the Prime X were fine on the green. Just getting there was a chore. I had several value packs and sent the unopened packs back. I have another value pack of Prime Balls (not the X). Not sure what to do with these. Very disappointed.

      Reply

      Anthony

      9 months ago

      Have been jumping around ball to ball trying to find the right ball. Started with Vice Pro+, they were pretty good but missing something. Tried the Kirklands, love them, but seem to spin a lot off the driver. A bad shot turns into a really bad shot. Seeing if the less spin off driver from Snell is what I’m looking for. I generate low spin so going with the softer one to get more green side spin. Will give a follow up after a few rounds.

      Reply

      Chris Odell

      11 months ago

      I received one of the first shipments of both the Prime and X balls, and played them every day for about a week to test. First, let me say that I love that company, and for the last few years, I’ve played their balls, mostly the X. I’ve found the Snells to perform as well, and be more durable than Titleist.

      The like the feel on shots with both new balls, probably still preferring the X but sadly I have to say they are far less durable. I’ve found the injection balls to generally feel cheaper in the hand and less durable so this doesn’t surprise me but it does make me sad.

      I’ve gone to Titleist ProV1X for now, but I hope Deam finds a way to get the cast covers back or improve durability at least. I’d much rather buy from Snell for a host of reasons, but performance and durability are both key to me and I’m not saving money when I have to replace a Snell 3x a round vs Titleist often lasting more than a round.

      Reply

      John Richardson

      1 year ago

      Been playing the Prime X…
      Great ball!
      Not a thing wrong with it.
      Ordered a dozen MTB Prime to compare.
      I hope I didn’t blow it cause I really like these X’s :)
      We shall… see…

      Reply

      Jim

      1 year ago

      Have been playing the mtb black the last few years Bought the trial pack of the Prime and Prime X Played 18 over the weekend alternating the three balls. Jury still out on the on the Prime and Prime x. The black just felt better and played better probably because of formiliarty of it. Just hope one of the new offering jumps out for me.

      Reply

      Barry S

      12 months ago

      Same here. I’ve been playing MTB Black since they came out in 2018. I loved them. Purchasing the trial pack, I tried the MTB Prime last week and was initially disappointed. Trajectory was lower and distance was 10 yards shorter. Short game around the green was equal to the Black. I will play them again and will try the Prime X soon. We will see. Thankfully I still have 2 dozen MTB Blacks left.

      Reply

      Barry S

      12 months ago

      UPDATE: I’ve played a few more rounds with the MTB Prime and I am liking them more and more. They do fly close to the former MTB Black. And the feel I get with them around the green is excellent. I am happy with them and will gladly purchase and play them going forward.

      Michael Bodo

      1 year ago

      If you watch the video Dean Snell posted on his company’s YouTube channel announcing the launch of these balls, he mentions how much time was spent focusing on R&D due to supply chain constraints, yet the best they could do is come up with inceremental improvements to their existing 3-piece ball? Not good enough, IMO. For a guy that helped design and launch the TaylorMade Penta in additoin to the Pro V1, where is Snell’s 4 or 5-layer ball? That would be game-changing and cause for me to get excited about the brand again. They blew a great opportunity to come out of the gates with something revolutionary and instead put new lipstick on their existing pigs, as if that’s enough to move the needle. If nothing else, they should have introduced two new 4-layer balls for better players and charged $40.00/dozen and offered the upgraded 3-layer balls for the game improvement crowd at the new price.

      Having played the Snell MTB Blue from 2017 – 2020, I’m disappointed more hasn’t been done to improve the balls performance in the ensuing years. I hate the new logo and the packaging looks uninspiring. I won’t go back to playing Snell’s until such time they introduce a ball with more layers than three.

      Reply

      Jack Weber

      1 year ago

      So you’re saying Titleist ProV1 is a crappy ball also since it’s a 3-piece, even though it’s extremely popular on the PGA Tour. Your statement is complete nonsense

      Reply

      Jack Weber

      1 year ago

      Snell never made an “MTB Blue”.

      Reply

      Dave Y

      12 months ago

      Actually, they did. I still have 6 sleeves in my stock.

      Jack Weber

      12 months ago

      A blue box, but never made a ball called MYB Blue

      Jay

      1 year ago

      I wonder why the majority of golf ball manufacturers, and the companies who don’t make anything, but pay an Asian factory to manufacture golf balls and stamp several “company names” on them all copy Titleist with the model name with many using the same or former generation side stamp designs and go as far as using a V & X in the model name?
      Some like Snell even cities the same side stamp design with a solid line above and below the side stamp that run parallel as a putting alignment aid. For a guy who loves talking about his work in Research & Development for Titleist and TaylorMade, he certainly doesn’t have any creative thoughts and doesn’t spend anything on Marketing. Is there another reason why so many who claim to be better or the best, none have ever created anything new or novel from the ball construction to the name, that’s pretty lame.

      Reply

      Scott S

      1 year ago

      First of all, I am interested in what you do for work? Second, when you say “don’t make anything” there is a big difference between being a 7-11 store that really doesn’t make anything and being a company that does all the research and development then farms the production out to other factories. The parent company is responsible for “making” the product that comes to market, e.g. Chevy and Ford don’t really “make” GPS systems, radios, seat heaters, collision warning radar and cameras etc., all the ammenties we have come to love and rely on in vehicles, so do they not still “make” vehicles?

      Effective marketing means copying what works, within the lines of infringement, so that people can identify with another and compare. Taylormade copied Titleist with TP5/TP5X and they actually stayed with the X being the lower spinning, softer ball when Titleist shifted several years ago (might even be a decade or more now) to the X being firmer, higher spinning. The solid lines above and below the side logo didn’t start with Titleist. Titleist had arrows on either side of the side marking starting in 2009, but the Callaway Tour 56 had them in 2005. Callaway started the Triple Track in 2019, here is a link to a forum asking when Titleist was going to start offering them (https://www.titleist.com/teamtitleist/team-titleist/f/golf-balls/44376/alignment-lines-on-golf-balls); I believe Maxfli started using the over/under lines in 2021. There is ample example of “copying what works for much at least aesthetics. As far as DTCs not making anything new, MGS did either an article or pod cast where this was discussed, the DTC companies are often using existing technology because they are not big enough to be doing R&D themselves, but they get creative with how they use what is already out there to come up with a close to equivalent products, at better prices, with hopefully decent QC. Unfortunately, or fortunately depending on perspective, they are hamstrung by copyright laws which limit their ability to use the newest developments so they are often a generation or so behind, but obviously are making good product because they are keeping up with the newest, most advanced products the big 3 are coming out with. The whole point behind DTC is to keep costs down, if you are familiar with business, one of the biggest expenses can be Marketing, so, as a small company if you are trying to keep your prices down you don’t spend a ton on Marketing, you spend it on the product; he has done that with assessing and qualifying manufacturers, establishing better than average QC. As far as the DTC companies, including Snell, not making anything novel they established a complete market of quality equipment that competes with the big guys at a better price, that alone is novel; as far as new goes, they aren’t collecting Titleist and TM balls from a lake and repainting them with a new logo so they aren’t “ground breaking innovations,” but they are new formulas and an alternative to paying the big guys to give stuff to millionaires on our dimes.

      Reply

      Brad Gollhardt

      1 year ago

      I have tried the Snell MTBX a couple of times. It is a good feeling ball, putts great, but the driver distance isn’t like a Titleist. It seems to spin more off the driver and drops down a little faster. I will definitely try the X version when it comes out in yellow. Can’t beat the price/quality value prop. But hoping for Tiliest ProVI distance.

      Reply

      Adam

      12 months ago

      Been playing MBT-X for several years – have tested it several times on launch monitors and found the performance nearly identical to ProV1 – and I cannot for the life of me understand why they would take the MTB-X equivalent ball and downshift the compression significantly. I have no interest in either some mushy, short, Chrome Soft wannabe competitor that and no interest in a ball that intentionally reduces spin with irons and wedges. Why one of the new balls wouldn’t have an identical profile to the MTB-X is beyond me. No way I can invest in any until more data comes out…

      Reply

      Dan F

      11 months ago

      Chrome soft is a 2 piece ball with a compression somewhere in the 30-60 scale whereas the 3 piece X models run in the 90’s. It’s by no means “soft”
      All they were attempting to do with the new lineup was to make the gap btwn the 2 models somewhat more noticeable but by no means a complete departure from what was their distinguishing factors.

      JP

      1 year ago

      Snell balls are great, but now Dean Snell says that “most golfers won’t notice the difference” between cast and injection-molded urethane balls. I seem to recall him saying that this was the key difference between a good ball and a great ball. He has a new logo, though!

      The Vice Pro, Pro Soft, and Pro Plus are all cast urethane balls (made by Foremost) and are among the best quality and best value on the market.

      But Dean is “cool” and the MYGOLFSPY guys seem to enjoy puckering up to him. Never see any love for Vice on the site. Just sayin…

      Reply

      Steve

      1 year ago

      Because Vice are not good balls.

      Reply

      MrHogan

      1 year ago

      This certainly is great news, so thx Tony and Dean for that. I’ve played Snell since their inception and have no plans to stop. Initially purchased because of the lower price and I can honestly say that I would still purchase if the price was raised. Found a retail golf store that stocked the MTBX during Covid and I purchased the last 4 doz they had. Knowing that Snell shelves will soon be stocked, I’m definitely looking forward to the new product.

      Reply

      Dave Crown

      1 year ago

      Looking forward to purchasing as soon as available

      Reply

      P.J. Evans

      1 year ago

      I was a die-hard Snell golf ball fan, one of the early testers and adopters, back when golfballed.com was still alive. Many of my golf partners also switched to Snell, but the supply problems coupled, which led to inability to buy the discounted 5-pack and the added cost of shipping forced me to migrate to OnCore (and I love the green ELIXR color). Having said all that – I’m really excited about Snell offering a new ball and can’t wait to try them. Of course I’ll be closely watching the MGS ball test results, as will everyone. Best wishes, Dean Snell – and welcome back!!

      Reply

      Jason W

      1 year ago

      When can we expect a ball lab report and review?

      Reply

      DuckHead

      1 year ago

      It’s good to see Snell on the comeback trail. I was a big fan of the MTB line. Can’t wait to try the new versions. Wasn’t a big fan of the old logo and packaging. The rebrand is a big improvement.

      Reply

      Steve S

      1 year ago

      “I’ve always felt the logo thing was overblown a bit but it’s not lost on me that some brands are purchased almost exclusively because of their logos.”

      You’re kidding, right? What moron would buy a golf ball based on it’s looks? Performance and quality are the only things that matter.

      Reply

      Jdogg

      1 year ago

      People are morons. They usually buy vice becaeust they think it’s hip

      Reply

      Scott S

      1 year ago

      Comment 1: Absolutely!
      Comment 2: LOL! Won’t argue with you, but apparently they are doing well in Ball Lab these days. Sometimes the gimmicky stuff starts out flashy and ends up putting out in the long run. Look at Callaway. I am still not a big fan, but I absolutely detested them when they first showed up. P1$$ p00r QC in their shafts and I just didn’t care for the “gimmicky” huge heads and stuff, but look where they started and where they are now. Not saying Vice or Snell or any of the DTC ball companies will ever be a Callaway story, but…
      Cheers

      Scott S

      1 year ago

      Where is the “like” button here? Concur with you completely; kind of like buying something because I saw a commercial. I cannot remember anything I bought because I saw and ad or a commercial. I honestly may have been made aware of an option for something I was looking for and done the research on that version, model, company’s item because of an ad or commercial, but I have NEVER purchased anything because it looked cool, the logo looked cool or because of an ad or an endorsement alone. But it takes all kinds.

      Reply

      Richard

      1 year ago

      I have always like Snell balls! With all that’s going on political overseas, why he’s doing business with China is a concern! I can see Taiwan an ally

      Reply

      Jdogg

      1 year ago

      You can’t buy anything then dude

      Reply

      Duke

      1 year ago

      Yes you can. Do the research. Not that hard.

      Duke

      1 year ago

      I like your thinking Richard. As soon as I saw China I said nope. Taiwan yep.

      Reply

      Mike

      1 year ago

      I like the Snell story, if I bought balls instead of finding them, I definitely look into them.

      I don’t understand comments about the logo. Folks, we’re talking about a freaking LOGO.

      Reply

      Kyle S

      1 year ago

      I’m soooooooo glad he’s back!!!!
      Bye, bye Vice….

      Reply

      Steve

      1 year ago

      You have always given injection vs cast a pretty good negative opinion and reviews. Why not with this ball ?

      Reply

      Will Hogg

      1 year ago

      I am so happy for him and his company. He has always been up front with his customers. I realize it is a “canned message”, but I love his signed note when I receive my golf balls. I would have still payed if the price was what it was. I will always support folks that are about the people. Can’t wait to order my test pack.

      Reply

      Mark Arnold

      1 year ago

      What brands use cast urethane now? I’m assuming Titleist, Callaway and Taylormade. Anyone else?

      Reply

      Chris Nickel

      1 year ago

      Titleist, TaylorMade and largely brands that source from Foremost (Maxfli).

      Callaway, Bridgestone use injection-molded TPU

      Reply

      Mark Arnold

      1 year ago

      Thanks Chris!

      Richard

      12 months ago

      Srixon is also TPU

      Tim

      1 year ago

      I’ve played MTB-X since the beginning of 2020 and have never looked back. I got lucky and bought Value packs (5-dozen) whenever they are available and been able to order the odd 1 or 2 packs whenever I needed to fill gaps. I know other people including Snell must have been pulling their hair out over supply, but I always had them in the bag. The biggest problem for me with this redesign is I think I no longer have a golf ball. My understanding was it was a Pro V1x clone to the MTB Black’s Pro V1. I don’t know if you could tell the difference if you hit them without logos. They were perfect. Just from the descriptions (hopefully you guys or TXG tests them before I run out of MTB-X so I can get some numbers), it sounds like anyone who played the MTB-X is SOL. Prime Black is way softer and won’t launch as high. Prime X will feel similar but probably won’t fly the same even though it’s “high launch” because it spins less. I have to think Titleist fits way more Ams into X than the standard Pro V1 because of the high-high characteristics and higher ball speed. Seems like they just sent all of us Pro V1X players that found them back to Titleist.

      Reply

      Mike

      1 year ago

      I heard MTB-X will still be in the line. Not sure if it’s true.

      Reply

      Jim

      1 year ago

      I have been a supporter of Snell golf balls since they first came out, including the Get Sum as well. I’ve read Dean’s previous comments regarding cast versus TPU balls and felt the cast balls were better so I’m surprised he would change. I’ve also felt the Snell balls were equivalent to the Titliest offerings and am curious if this change will affect playability. Never been a fan of Srixon balls with TPU but that may be due to other reasons, I just hope the Snell balls and their quality continue – we’ll see with the next MGS tests. Not a fan of the new logo, but I’m sure it will grow on me over time. Have only played Snell balls for some time and hope the new balls match quality and performance seen previously. Look forward to the new offerings.

      Reply

      8pt172

      1 year ago

      Dean did not have a choice with the cast issue. It was either go with the TPU or wait until Taylormade could produce his ball. Hopefully the new ball holds up well and the cast issue will not be an issue.

      Reply

      Chris Odell

      1 year ago

      I like the feel of both balls but I’m going to miss the old X as I preferred the durability of the cast covers, these injection ones seem to scuff easy and feel cheap, but I feel that way about Bridgestone too. I hope he finds a way to get the cast back in the future.

      Reply

      JB Watkins

      1 year ago

      I placed a pre-order for a test pack this morning. Snell has always played well for me, but I’m a bit upset they flip-flopped the spin properties of the models. MTB-X used to compare to the Pro V1X now it seems that isn’t the case with the new MTB Prime X.

      Reply

      Chisag

      1 year ago

      I can look past a cheap logo iff the ball performs. But I will never understand why any Ball OEM installs an alignment aid that looks like a Range Ball and instantly turns off potential customers. If you like alignment aids you can always add one or like Callaway Triple Track offer one ball with them and one without them.

      Reply

      Peter Rosenfeld

      1 year ago

      I don’t buy new golf balls any more. I find so many top quality good condition balls it is just a crime to spend more money on ANY brand of balls. As MGS own testing has proven- type of ball matters more to pro’s and low handicappers then to old duffer like me!

      Reply

      Andrew Beck

      1 year ago

      The cast cover was one of the big reasons I used this over other DTC balls. There’s videos of Dean himself talking about the superiority of casting the cover. I don’t doubt with enough money and time an injected cover could be as good as cast, but I doubt it’s ever going to be better (or Titleist would switch).

      The reason I chose the MTB-X over other balls, was I liked what Dean was doing and wanted to support him. Now, I’m probably going to switch to the Maxfli.

      Reply

      Geno52

      1 year ago

      As per Chris Nickel in above post…..

      Titleist, TaylorMade and largely brands that source from Foremost (Maxfli).

      Callaway, Bridgestone use injection-molded TPU

      So apparently Titleist believes that injection molding is superior to casting urethane covers
      Just an FYI
      Peace

      Reply

      Troy

      1 year ago

      Geno52 you read the comment wrong. “Titleist, TaylorMade and largely brands that source from Foremost(Maxfli)” use cast covers. Callaway and Bridgestone use injection.

      Geno52

      1 year ago

      You’re right Troy. My bad. Also my apologies to you Andrew, mistook a period for a comma after Maxfli. No glasses on…. my fault.

      Peace

      AMG

      1 year ago

      Can someone clarify — if I liked black over MTB X should I get prime or prime X? Or just try both?

      Reply

      Keith

      1 year ago

      Interesting article. When do territories outside of the continental USA start being able to order the new products? I’m in the UK and not been able to get any stock for 18 months+. The UK site still shows the X and Black.
      I’ve been using Snell since the Red was available in the UK.

      Reply

      Corey

      1 year ago

      Had this release date on my calendar since it came out, glad to see my purchase this morning immediately followed up with this article! I’ve played MTB-X balls since they were available, so with this new release I didn’t hesitate, in Dean I trust! Can’t wait to see your ball lab reports.

      Reply

      GilB

      1 year ago

      Hope the new materials are an improvement on the old balls, not that they were bad but they scuffed a little too easily. Also, really like the new logo.

      Reply

      ryan

      1 year ago

      Snell needs to hire a graphic designer. His logos make the balls look like something you’d buy off of Wish.

      Reply

      Alex

      1 year ago

      Hopefully the cover is as durable as the previous balls. Glad to see the price has not increased on bulk buys

      Reply

      Da Slammer

      1 year ago

      I will get the yellow whenever that comes out!
      I would love for you to compare it to the new Maxflis, please! Thanks

      Reply

      John O

      1 year ago

      Dean’s video says 322 dimples.

      Reply

      AJS218

      1 year ago

      I wonder if the yellow golf balls will be painted or of the dye will be mixed into the cover like the Pro V1, TP5, Tour B, or Z-Star. That was my only gripe with them before. When the covers are painted (think Vice), the scuffs are so much more visible.

      Reply

      Ranny Reynolds

      1 year ago

      Just placed my order for the Prime. Will compare to the AVX.

      Reply

      David Lewis

      1 year ago

      Quality standards. What a concept.

      Reply

      HARKSHARK

      1 year ago

      I stick to a brand that’s in stock consistently not to jump around or be stuck waiting like with vice golf or Snell. Not to mention the pricing here in Canada with Snell by the time you add shipping etc it’s not really a deal. Example srixon xv go on sale half price about $29.99 cdn a dozen twice a year with easy delivery for free if wanting online or pickup in retailer Golftown. Not a fan of the new logo it went from very bad to bad. Now it looks like something on a top flight in 1980.

      Reply

      Pete

      1 year ago

      Really like the MTB Black. Look forward to trying these. I think they missed the mark on the logo unfortunately.

      Reply

      Tom S

      1 year ago

      So if I remember correctly, Snell was one of the companies that got thrown out of Foremost when TaylorMade bought them. I was inder the impression that Foremost and Nassau were the only two factories that made quality balls. Was I wrong about that? According to Dean, there are some others.

      Reply

      Storm319

      1 year ago

      First, Snell was not thrown out like other DTC brands, however was relegated as a lower priority than the TM brand which adds to the supply uncertainty that he has been experiencing over the past year plus.

      Next, Nassau and Foremost were the only independent factories with the ability to produce cast thermoset urethane covers (Foremost is the only one left following Nassau’s acquisition). There are a few other factories that produce injection molded thermoplastic urethane covers that have good quality, but as mentioned this is a big deviation from Dean’s past offerings (minus the MTB Red).

      Reply

      Tim Schoch

      1 year ago

      MTB-X AND MTB Black are not on sale on the site.

      Reply

      TR1PTIK

      1 year ago

      Can’t wait for Ball Lab on these. I’ve gamed MTB Black and MTB-X at various points, but moved away from them during COVID due to the supply issues. Will gladly return to the brand if quality checks out.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    News
    Apr 25, 2024
    Myrtle Beach Classic YouTube Qualifier Is An Interesting Concept That Doesn’t Quite Deliver
    Golf Technology
    Apr 25, 2024
    Skillest is Reimagining Golf Instruction
    Golf Bag Carts
    Apr 25, 2024
    Forum Member Review: Clicgear Model 4.0 Golf Push Cart
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.