Srixon Q-STAR Tour Golf Ball
Golf Balls

Srixon Q-STAR Tour Golf Ball

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Srixon Q-STAR Tour Golf Ball

Early January is to golf equipment writers what early April is to tax accountants – it’s when the you-know-what flies fast and furious as every major, minor, and wanna-be golf company has something new for you to read about and us to write about.

Golf balls can get lost in the shuffle, especially if it’s not a major brand Tour-update. Well, Srixon certainly is a major brand, but its Q-STAR Tour line of balls is in that nether-region between Tour-level balls and your garden variety 2- or 3-piece ionomer ball.

Still, the clock on the wall says it’s time to update the Q-STAR Tour – an interesting ball in a weird category.

Not Quite Tour-Level

Tour-level balls – and you know which ones they are – are clearly Tier-1. Your Tier 3 balls are the $24-$26/dozen ionomer balls with some firmness and some spin tech built-in, while Tier 4 balls are you basic, soft, 2-piece ionomer balls in the $20/dozen range.

It’s Tier 2 that’s a bit weird.

There you’ll find the likes of the TaylorMade Project (a), Wilson Duo Professional, Titleist Tour Soft, and others. Some feature urethane covers, others ionomer, but all are softer than Tier One balls, while touting enough spin for the average Joe. They’re also priced in the $30 to $35/dozen range.

Less expensive than Tour-level balls, no doubt, unless you look to the Direct-To-Consumer Tour brands, such as Snell, that will sell you Tour-level balls in bulk for the price of a Tier 3 ball. Like I said, it’s a weird category.

Srixon first introduced Q-STAR Tour three years ago as a 3-piece, urethane ball for those of us who don’t swing it like Shane, Hideki or Keegan. The biggest difference was compression. The most recent Z-STAR has a compression of 90, while the Z-STAR XV comes in at 102. The original Q-STAR Tour had a compression of 75 (this new version, like Gen 2, is 72), and with its performance characteristics, Srixon could have called it Z-STAR Soft.

Generation 3 of the Q-STAR Tour adds the most recent Z-STAR technology to the line – specifically Srixon’s FastLayer Core and the latest version of Spin Skin – along with a new alignment aid.

Cores, Skins, and Arrows

The SRI in Srixon stands for Sumitomo Rubber Industries, the Japanese tire and rubber giant that owns Dunlop Sports, Ltd and, by extension, Srixon-Cleveland-XXIO. Like its Japanese itoko Bridgestone, Srixon leverages its homegrown rubber engineering juice to develop new core technology. And as is consistent in the ball industry, Tour-level technology eventually works its way into Tier 2 offerings.

Specifically, with Q-STAR Tour, we’re talking the FastLayer Core and SeRM coating.

FastLayer made its debut in the current generation Z-STAR line. The short story is the FastLayer core is relatively soft on the inside and gradually gets firmer on the outside. Srixon – and other ball makers, for that matter – get there through a combination of rubber chemistry along with time, temperature, and pressure variations during the baking process.

“In effect,” Srixon Marketing Director Brian Schielke tells MyGolfSpy, “the core acts like it’s built from thousands of really thin cores.”

As with the Z-STAR, the FastLayer core allows Srixon to make the core just a bit larger in the Q-STAR Tour than the previous model, which featured Srixon’s older Energetic Gradient Growth (EGG) core. Srixon says the result should be overall distance and short game spin similar to its Tour balls, with a softer feel at 72 compression.

“Softer does produce lower ball speeds,” says Schielke. “But ball speed isn’t the only thing that impacts distance. The FastLayer core helps Q-STAR Tour have a remarkably high launch and low spin relative to compression, so it’s really long off the driver and irons, even though the actual ball speed might not be as high as Z-STAR.”

GET FIT FOR YOUR GAME WITH TRUEGOLFFIT™

Unbiased. No Guesswork. All Major Brands. Matched To Your Swing. Advanced Golf Analytics matches the perfect clubs to your exact swing using connected data and machine learning.

FREE FITTING

The new Q-STAR Tour ball also includes the latest version of Srixon’s Spin Skin with SeRM – or Slide-Ring Material. The cover itself is urethane, and SeRM is an additional urethane coating that bonds to the cover on a molecular level. SeRM actually crosslinks the urethane molecules, making them stronger and more flexible at the same time, which enhances both durability and spin.

“SeRM is ultra-elastic for more greenside spin and control,” says Schielke. “It gives us that one-hop-and-stop performance on the green.”

And it may not seem like a big deal, but Srixon is adding a bold alignment side-stamping to the Q-STAR Tour.

Price, Availability, and Final Thoughts

The new FastLayer Core and SeRM coating are adding to Q-STAR Tour’s price – a $3/dozen increase from $29.99 to $32.99.

“Those are the same technologies as used on our Z-STAR Tour-level balls,” says Schielke. “They’re not easy to manufacture.”

That price tag is right in the sweet spot with other Tier-2 balls, but also in the wheelhouse of Direct-To-Consumer brands such as Vice and Snell, which offer Tier-1 balls at the same price, or better if bought in bulk. Schielke says Srixon stands on its performance, quality, and consistency to justify its asking price.

“We’ve been engineering top-performing golf balls since 1930 (under the Dunlop brand at that time), with a focus on getting better each generation,” he says. “All those years of testing, improving and perfecting each aspect of the golf ball has led to the high quality, top-performing balls we have today.”

While Direct-To-Consumer is growing, the fact remains most golf balls are sold by the major brands, either at retail or online – it’s a comfort-level thing as much as anything else. Titleist, obviously, dominates the field, with Callaway a distant 2nd. After that, it’s a horse race between TaylorMade, Bridgestone, and Srixon.

Srixon leapfrogged Bridgestone into 4th place in units-sold ball market last year for about a month, thanks to a BOGO promotion on the Z-STAR line. It slid back into 5th place once the promotion was over, but the promo did its job as Srixon’s overall market share grew. Srixon has never been bashful about sales promos, so it wouldn’t be a shock to see another Z-Star deal this spring or summer, as well as a late-season promo on the new Q-STAR Tour.

As mentioned, the new Q-STAR Tour will retail at $32.99/dozen and will be available in Pure White™ and Tour Yellow™, and will hit the stores and the world wide web January 17th.

If you need even more help getting great gear, explore our product reviews and our buying guides.

For You

For You

News
Apr 25, 2024
Myrtle Beach Classic YouTube Qualifier Is An Interesting Concept That Doesn’t Quite Deliver
Golf Technology
Apr 25, 2024
Skillest is Reimagining Golf Instruction
Golf Bag Carts
Apr 25, 2024
Forum Member Review: Clicgear Model 4.0 Golf Push Cart
John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

John is an aging, yet avid golfer, writer, 6-point-something handicapper living back home in New England after a 22-year exile in Minnesota. He loves telling stories, writing about golf and golf travel, and enjoys classic golf equipment. “The only thing a golfer needs is more daylight.” - BenHogan

John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

John Barba





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Bowser

      4 years ago

      Thanks for the article. Currently gaming the e-12 and when ever I can get it for under $30 (Canadian) I pick some up. Not to mention the 6 dz Santa dropped off. I play over 150 rds a year (218 this past yr) so you might be surprised how quickly a cart path and the odd lake can add up in golf ball requirements.

      When I do find a nice Srixon I don’t leave that one on the next tee box I just bag it for the off season when finding golf balls in the fall leaves or the spring mud can be a challenge. There are some out there I will just leave in the woods…lol… As to the DTC comments here it just doesn’t pay to be Canadian. Shipping costs, rate of exchange, custom charges are just 3 things that make it just ‘not a good deal’. I do play some of them when I find them just to see but they haven’t out performed what I usually hit at the time. Snell, Vice, and others tend to now just stay on the next tee box for golfers behind me or in my group.

      Reply

      Max Johnson

      4 years ago

      Im a cheapskate. Doesnt mean I always buy whats cheapest, but I do my homework so I get the best value I can (at least based on my own personal metrics)

      Ive looked at the DTC balls several times, and yes they seem to offer Tier 1 performance at Tier 2 prices (cheaper if you buy in bulk) but I feel that’s a bit of a misnomer, that somehow keeps getting sidestepped here (not trying to call you guys out, I come here for the objectivity ONLY you guys offer, Im just kinda curious to be honest)…

      the DTC balls charge for shipping unless you buy a certain amount. That shipping cost (if you’re only trying to buy a dozen to test before you want to commit to 5 doz) boosts that price right up into Tier 1 levels. At that point, why not buy the real thing?

      Ive tried talking to playing partners about getting together and everyone buying a dozen, but dont get much interest. To lots of them, it seems more of a novelty than something they’re willing to try. I’ve sat at my desk, with a dozen in the cart, hovering over the “buy now” button, but cant pull the trigger

      Enough about my peccadillos, I just find it odd that the freight charge never gets mentioned when DTC balls are discussed here, even when said freight charge basically removes the selling point the DTC ball has over the Tier 1 ball

      As far as these go, Ill likely give them a run. I was an E6 guy for years, but something about the e12’s isn’t right for me and Ive been wandering since (also missed 60% of last summer with an injury)

      Reply

      Kip J

      4 years ago

      Thanks for the review. I remember Sam and Harry mentioning that Srixon occasionally recommended QStar Tour players with high swing speed/high spin. Do they still do that with this version of the QStar Tour?

      Reply

      RyneJordan23

      4 years ago

      I have played previous iterations of the Q-Star Tour and generally been happy with its performance. As someone unwilling to pay the prices for Tier 1 balls, I found the ball to be a happy compromise of what I wanted and what I could afford.

      This article reminded me of the opportunity which exists in the Tier 2 ball category for the right manufacturer (not the DTC vertical), thinking back to Bridgestone’s discounting of their top-line balls from $44.99 to $34..99 at the end of 2019. This was a significant-enough price drop to change my buying behavior, especially when it’s coupled with the high-quality ball studies published here and (to cite another one I found informative and sound in its principles) Today’s Golfer magazine in the UK.

      Granted, Bridgestone has to sell approximately 29% more units at this new price point to generated the same revenue level (no small feat), but if this move could help a manufacturer snare more market share, and more future sales, it could be an effective step.

      Reply

      Harvey

      4 years ago

      Can’t wait to try this version of this somewhat mysteriously exceptional golf ball.

      Look closely at the MyGolfSpy buyer’s guide stats :

      It’s a ball with nearly the lowest compression and with one of the lowest ball speeds (only the Callaway Chrome Soft, the Callaway ERC Soft and the Wilson Duo urethane had a lower ball speed) that launches up in the top third of all the balls tested but has nearly the lowest backspin ( only the Callaway ERC Soft and the MG Tour C4 Urethane launch with a lower spin rate); AND YET, it is one of the TOP SIX balls in carry and the #1 ball of the top six in being online! So you give up six yards in distance but gain eight yards in accuracy. . .

      Hmmmm. . .

      Reply

      John

      4 years ago

      Geez, would you guys stop the hype on Snell, please? Your test literally showed that the Snell ball produces the highest standard deviations (read: least accurate). Why do you keep hyping them up? They’re range balls.

      By the way, thanks for showing me that they’re range balls. A+ test. Now, no more with the “best” value stuff. It’s not true.

      Reply

      Walter Hagan's Ghost

      4 years ago

      Uhh, article’s on Srixon….

      Reply

      Eye4golf

      4 years ago

      Snells are definitely not range balls. I have played generation 1 and 2 qstar tour which I like but the Snell spins a little more(greens) than gen 2. I play what works best for my single plane, one length, 10.8 hdcp swing rather than all that stat stuff.

      Reply

      Don

      4 years ago

      Where’s the cut? Let’s cut the ball. Any review of golf balls should come with a cross section.

      Reply

      JS

      4 years ago

      Article stated they won’t be out til 17th, so that’s probably why no cut yet – this is a “first look” article. However, I agree that any “review” of a ball should include the cut!

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    News
    Apr 25, 2024
    Myrtle Beach Classic YouTube Qualifier Is An Interesting Concept That Doesn’t Quite Deliver
    Golf Technology
    Apr 25, 2024
    Skillest is Reimagining Golf Instruction
    Golf Bag Carts
    Apr 25, 2024
    Forum Member Review: Clicgear Model 4.0 Golf Push Cart
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.