Srixon ZX4 Irons: GI, SGI or Player’s Distance?
Irons

Srixon ZX4 Irons: GI, SGI or Player’s Distance?

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Srixon ZX4 Irons: GI, SGI or Player’s Distance?

Key Takeaways:

  • Wide sole, hollow-body game-improvement irons with a forged-like feel
  • Lowest center of gravity in Srixon line for easy launch and high flight
  • Progressive Grooves and signature Srixon V.T. Sole for turf interaction
  • $1,299.99 per set in steel, $1,399.99 in graphite.
  • Available at retail March 5

The new Srixon ZX4 irons surprised us a little. There are two layers to that statement.

We knew the ZX5 and ZX7 irons were in the pipeline as an on-schedule update to the two-year-old Z-85 irons. But the ZX4s? Totally under the radar until the samples showed up.

That’s the first-layer surprise. The second-layer surprise?

Srixon has something here you’re definitely going to want to try.

Srixon ZX4 Irons – Hollow to the Core

Hollow-body irons certainly aren’t new. Heck, even forged darling Mizuno has the HMB-20. But the Srixon ZX4 irons are, depending on how you look at it, either category busters or misfit toys. The sole width screams “super game improvement” but the topline and offset suggest “player’s distance.” The ZX4’s loft structure will surely get Torch and Pitchfork Nation riled and angry but it’s not out of line for game improvement irons. But, then again, the relatively short blade length and forged-like sound and feel make you think player’s distance again.

OK, Srixon, what gives?

“We’re creating more overlap into the game improvement category,” says Dustin Brekke, Srixon’s Director of Engineering. “A few years back, we had the 355 series but I don’t think we fully got behind it.”

When Cleveland returned as a full-line OEM, it positioned itself firmly in the GI/SGI categories. Srixon bridged the gap from better player-ish GI irons (like the Z585, the 2018 Most Wanted GI iron) to cavity backs and blades. The ZX4 puts Srixon squarely in the game improvement category. Sort of.

“The biggest thing you’ll see between this and Cleveland is the size of these irons,” says Brekke. “It’s a better player-focused shorter blade length. It’s a smaller look in the ZX4 that you’re just not going to see in Cleveland irons.”

So, into what category does the ZX4 fall? Let’s just say it’s a “super-forgiving hollow-bodied game improvement player’s distance iron with forged feel.”

There. That should clear things up.

Hollow Mainframe

The Srixon ZX4 shares considerable DNA with the ZX5 irons: two-piece construction featuring Srixon’s Mainframe face design. We discussed Mainframe at length in our story on the ZX5/ZX7 launch in November. The Cliff Notes version, however, says Mainframe is a variable-thickness face designed using Srixon’s latest Artificial Intelligence software. A unique pattern of channels, cavities and grooves is milled into the back of the face. The end result is—all together now—optimized ball speed over a larger area of the face.

The face material itself is HT1770 steel (the HT is for High Tensile) while the head is 431 stainless steel. While neither qualifies as “forged” in the traditional sense, the combination results in a forged feel that will make you a little weak-kneed and squishy.

As mentioned earlier, the ZX4’s sole width is very much SGI. Srixon does a nice job of hiding it at address but there’s no denying the ZX4 is broad in the beam.

“It’s deliberate, especially in the long irons,” says Brekke. “The hollow body combined with the wide sole and a short hosel, plus tungsten weighting in the mid- and long-irons, gives us one of the lowest centers of gravity on the market.”

If you’re thinking the ZX4 sounds an awful lot like Srixon’s utility irons, you’re on the right track but you’ll need to go back a generation to the U-85s.

“Those utilities had a much wider sole compared to the new generation ZX utility irons,” says Brekke. “A lot of the U-85 performance and technology is there throughout the ZX4 set along with Mainframe and a few new nuggets along the way.”

Specifically, we’re talking about Srixon’s signature V.T. Sole and its new Progressive Grooves.

GET FIT FOR YOUR GAME WITH TRUEGOLFFIT™

Unbiased. No Guesswork. All Major Brands. Matched To Your Swing. Advanced Golf Analytics matches the perfect clubs to your exact swing using connected data and machine learning.

FREE FITTING

Groovin’ with Sole

As the Srixon ZX4 set progresses into the short irons, the heads obviously get less hollow. The blades also get a little shorter and heavier. And once you hit the 40-degree mark in loft, much of Mainframe’s hot-face benefit starts to drop off. The impact is more glancing than it is blunt force.

“As we progress through the set, we’re focusing on consistency and what players look for in launch angles and spin,” says Brekke. “That’s where we see the Progressive Grooves in the set.”

As we learned with the ZX5 and ZX7, Progressive Grooves are all about consistency. The ZX4 long- and mid-irons feature wider and shallower grooves. The grooves get more aggressive in the 8-iron through pitching wedge. The scoring irons have deeper grooves that are closer together to provide consistent spin on your approach shots.

Srixon irons are known for their turf interaction, thanks to the V.T. Sole. The V-shape on the sole helps the clubhead glide through the turf, even if you hit it a tad fat. The V.T. Sole is featured in the ZX4, which may seem like overkill considering it already has a wide sole.

“Our target player is more of a sweeper-type player,” says Brekke. “They don’t have as steep of an attack so they struggle with chunking behind the ball. The wider V.T. Sole with the low CG helps.”

Loft Alert

So, yeah, the Srixon ZX4 irons have strong lofts. Not crazy strong, mind you, but they are what they are.

“It’s tricky,” says Brekke. “We’re trying to design sweet spot and CG location and overall performance to optimize distance and carry at every loft. But there’s this unfortunate reality of the need to perform well and win in fitting environments.”

OEMs know they don’t want to be the short knocker in the fitting bay. That’s why the ZX4’s 28.5-degree club is a 7-iron and not a 6-iron. The standard ZX4 set is 4-iron (21 degrees) through gap wedge (49-degrees). If Srixon labeled the set 3-iron through pitching wedge instead of 4-iron through gap wedge, would Torch and Pitchfork Nation be as cranky?

“It’s semantics and, in many ways, it’s a silly game,” says Brekke. “But on the performance side, if we did mark the 33-degree 8-iron a 7-iron and somebody compared it to their own 33-degree 7-iron, they will hit this one higher and it will get off the ground easier. But put the same swing on both irons and compare your best shots and you’ll  see very similar spin, control and distance.”

Translation: If you need to hit a 150-yard shot and you know which club goes that distance, what the hell difference does it make what number is on the bottom?

“The driver is the only club in the bag you’re trying to hit as far as you can,” adds Brekke. “So the conversation really becomes, ‘What iron do you need to go a certain distance? What’s going to give you the most consistency and control?’ That’s going to show itself in spin, launch and turf interaction. The number on the iron doesn’t matter. It’s just a number.”

Srixon ZX4 Specs, Price, Availability and Final Thoughts

I’m not sure we’re any closer to figuring in what category the Srixon ZX4 irons belong. GI? SGI? Player’s distance?

All of the above?

Maybe it’s best to call them nice-looking irons with a reasonable offset, topline and blade length. And even though they’re not forged, Srixon has managed to instill a forged-like feel you don’t usually get in hollow-body irons. A couple of mid-winter range sessions show the ZX4s are silly easy to launch, fly high and, thank you lofts, go like hell.

Even with the widest sole in the ZX family, the Srixon ZX4 doesn’t really look out of place with its slightly older brothers. The ZX4 blade length is barely a millimeter longer than the ZX5 and just two to 2 1/2 millimeters longer than the ZX7. The topline is only one millimeter thicker and the offsets are only a millimeter or so deeper.

Srixon put some thought into its choice of the Nippon N.S. Pro 950GH neo as its stock steel shaft. Nippon describes the 950GH neo as mid-launch and it’s specifically engineered for stronger lofted irons. The 950GH neo has what Nippon calls a “flowing” kick-point to create a kind of reverse-whip at the tip to optimize spin.

The 950GH neo is a lightweight shaft. The R-flex comes in at 94.5 grams and the S-flex at 98 grams. Srixon does offer any steel shaft in its catalog at no upcharge.

The stock graphite shaft is the UST Mamiya Recoil 760 or 780 and the stock grip is the Golf Pride Tour Velvet 360.

The basic set (4-AW) is available for righties. Pricing is $1,299.99 in steel and $1,399.99 in graphite. Since the gap wedge is available for righties only, the standard left-handed set will be 4-PW and will retail for $1,137.99 in steel and $1,224.99 in graphite.

The Srixon ZX4 irons will hit retail on March 5. Pre-order is available on February 22.

For more information, visit Srixon.com.

For You

For You

News
Apr 25, 2024
Myrtle Beach Classic YouTube Qualifier Is An Interesting Concept That Doesn’t Quite Deliver
Golf Technology
Apr 25, 2024
Skillest is Reimagining Golf Instruction
Golf Bag Carts
Apr 25, 2024
Forum Member Review: Clicgear Model 4.0 Golf Push Cart
John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

John is an aging, yet avid golfer, writer, 6-point-something handicapper living back home in New England after a 22-year exile in Minnesota. He loves telling stories, writing about golf and golf travel, and enjoys classic golf equipment. “The only thing a golfer needs is more daylight.” - BenHogan

John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

John Barba





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Tom Duckworth

      3 years ago

      I think it is great that there is all these irons to build combo sets but OEMs really need to add clubs to fitters carts. Not every one needs to change over at 7 or 5 it would be nice to be able to hit 4, 5 & 6 irons to see where your gaps fell. A fitting isn’t cheap and nether is a set of irons. It should be a true fitting not a guesstimate.

      Reply

      Bubbly Pop

      3 years ago

      I understand what everyone is saying, however, for those of us that don’t produce distance with any height trajectory in a long iron, any help with such is appreciated. I love my JPX 919 short irons, but the long irons not so much, such I may experiment with combining these sets. Based on my current set make up I have room for carrying two different 6 or 7 irons if I need help with a gapping issue. What do I know about the ZX4’s? When I hit it a noticeable improvement in both sound and feel occurred in comparison to my JPX clubs, with the soft but solid feel being the aspect that was exciting.

      Reply

      Oweno2

      3 years ago

      Looks like a variation and improvement to the Cleveland UHX So where does that leave the future of the Cleveland lines? Don’t really care about the lofts but the gapping seems unusual butt what ever works

      Reply

      Darren Abrahams

      3 years ago

      Get over the lofts guys. Srixon is making awesome irons. Who cares if they need to cater this to the distance buyer. They don’t have a household name and need an edge to capture a new piece of the market.

      I had a combo set with the 7/5s from a couple years ago. Amazing for me as I’m very steep. Turf interaction is the key. Clubs were stolen, and I was about to order new combo… Now I wonder about the 4s even just in my longest couple irons. I appreciate forgiveness with long irons. Curious that they say the 4 is for sweepers though…

      Reply

      Kevin

      3 years ago

      As always great article great read. But slightly confused, what is the reason behind the lack of an AW in LH?

      Reply

      Chris

      3 years ago

      Demand. LH is already a smaller market and lots of people prefer to buy a gap wedge that’s the same as their sand and lob wedges for their 50-53* rather than a set wedge.

      Reply

      Dr Strangelove

      3 years ago

      Great looking irons, but ridiculous loft gaps. No thank you. I think it was Wishon who said that amateurs shouldn’t even hit irons with less than 26* loft. You’d start with a 7 iron using that advice with this set.

      Reply

      Mike

      3 years ago

      Great post and I agree fully. Given I have a moderate swing speed, the lowest lofted iron I now carry is a 6i (it used to be a 5i before they really started jacking up the lofts). So now you have noticeable distance gaps within your short irons, PW & AW. That makes NO sense! But at least now you can say you hit 8i to that par 3 that you used to hit a 7i to! And these new irons cost 50% more than the ones from only 4-5 years ago.

      Reply

      Carolyn

      3 years ago

      Wonder how they match up to the 2018 Ben Hogan forged EDGE irons I just traded for new ping 425’s? They were hollow body but forged..?

      Reply

      Brent

      3 years ago

      So…a 28 degree hollow headed club? That sounds awfully familiar (cough PXG 0211).
      Will these clubs be reviewed the same as just loft jacking?

      Reply

      Brandon

      3 years ago

      If the number on the bottom doesn’t matter, then why did they decide to change the lofts? The answer is easy, it’s to cater to the egos of short hitters. The 4 iron being 21 degrees is fine, but why did they pack so many clubs so close together in loft?

      Reply

      James

      3 years ago

      Simple – when you go for a fitting, it’s all 7-irons. That’s the basic problem. Are guys going to buy them if Srixon stays more traditional and they’re 10 yards shorter than competitors? Nope.

      The loft jacking is caused by the dynamics of the fitting process and, to be honest, male egos.

      Reply

      Jon

      3 years ago

      Club champion uses a 6 iron. Fully agree with the 7 iron analogy. My grandma can hit a 23. Try hitting a 19 degree 4?

      Jeff

      3 years ago

      I used to be all up in arms about the loft jacking. Until you start to look at the numbers and the players each line of clubs is designed for.

      These are for mid-to-high handicappers.

      So they don’t necessarily have the natural distance as someone sporting cavity backs…or even muscle backs.

      So the lower loft evens up the playing field a bit.

      So you use a 28.5 degree 7 iron here to hit, say a 155 shot. You can do the same with a 32 degree ZX-7 7 irons.

      Same result….two different ways to get there for two very different players.

      Reply

      James

      3 years ago

      This ^^^^! They make a product for all you 110+ mph clubhead speed players.. Those same players are itching to hit these so they post about how they hit it 200 yards and it’s ridiculous, blah, blah.

      I wish they would start banning any comment that complains about lofts or prices. It’s just the same complaint over and over on every single article.

      Reply

      Sweeper

      3 years ago

      ZX7 – 7-PW
      ZX4 – 5-7

      Done.

      Reply

      Kermit Dogbone

      3 years ago

      You’re going to have nearly 8 degrees between your 6 and 7 iron. This club looks to fit into a full set set-up or maybe with the ZX5 once you gap them correctly. ZX5 and ZX7 is a much better combo, might be best in the industry in terms of transition and shape.

      Reply

      NN

      3 years ago

      I think the suggestion might be for two seven irons, one in each of the ZX4 and ZX7

      The 5-7 in ZX4 would basically be your 4-6 and moving into the 7-PW in ZX7

      dski93

      3 years ago

      I find these clubs interesting to try but the gapping is giving me a headache. Hopefully they are tuned so in the real world it makes sense how far they actually fly.

      Reply

      BurkeLakePro

      3 years ago

      Mike’s right–the gapping on the 4-7 irons is ridonkulous. Just a 2 degree difference between a 4 and 5 iron? Insane. It seems like the only way to slow down this excessive loft-jacking is to replace the iron number to the iron loft on the sole of the club. Then they won’t have the incentive to call a 28.5 degree club a “7 iron.”

      Reply

      WYBob

      3 years ago

      “…The number on the iron doesn’t matter. It’s just a number.” – that sums up the attitude of the major OEM’s in a nutshell. The Ben Hogan Equipment Company was onto something about 7 years ago when they dropped putting numbers on the sole and instead stamped the loft in degrees. It took some initial adjustment, but at least I knew what the heck I was hitting. Sadly, even they are now back to stamping numbers instead of loft on the sole. Now I mark the loft on the hostel with a Sharpie just so I can know what I am hitting in the event I swap out iron sets. There really needs to be a set of standards in golf for things like the loft, shaft flexes, etc.

      Reply

      Mike

      3 years ago

      Nice review & nice-looking clubs. But the loft thing continues to be stupid. Four clubs within a range of 7.5°??? I defy any average player to tell me that with the longer irons, you’re going to get consistent distant gaps with a 2.5° loft change between clubs. And the price is nothing to sneeze at. Wait till next season, these clubs will cost a third less once next year’s super new & improved models come out.

      Reply

      McaseyM

      3 years ago

      I agree with the loft jacking can seem ridiculous, my last irons were Cleveland CBX with a 20 degree 4i, but after hearing Tony explain it a but more helped me to understand it better… the lower the CG goes, they have to balance it out with stronger lofts otherwise shots tend to balloon and you lose control and distance. Now, do they need to be this strong??? maybe not, but unfortunately distance sells to the majority of golfers and they will focus on the 1-2 longer balls they hit in their fittings.

      Reply

      Kansas King

      3 years ago

      I agree that the gapping seems weird but these hollow-body clubs aren’t necessarily going to have as linear performance as a solid forging. It’s hard to tell if Srixon has hotter faces in the longer irons. I have more of a problem with the gapping on the scoring end. 6 degrees between the AW and then about 5 degree gapping to the 7 iron seems to be a bit much. Sub 45 degree PWs makes it difficult to gap wedges if you’re the type who likes to have a 60* in the bag. I have a feeling they had to stretch the AW to 49* to make gapping appear easier without addressing the fact they just put 6* between two of the most used irons in the bag. Maybe the COR/CT ratings for all the iron heads are different and necessitate the loft gaps but that usually isn’t the case for the shorter end of the set. Srixon makes good irons and I’m not saying these are bad but they definitely seem to be chasing launch monitor numbers over real world playability. I can already see the average retail golf customer at Golf Galaxy being wowed by how far they are hitting a 28.5* 7-iron and putting $1200 down on the spot (or financing!) just because the distance numbers were massive.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    News
    Apr 25, 2024
    Myrtle Beach Classic YouTube Qualifier Is An Interesting Concept That Doesn’t Quite Deliver
    Golf Technology
    Apr 25, 2024
    Skillest is Reimagining Golf Instruction
    Golf Bag Carts
    Apr 25, 2024
    Forum Member Review: Clicgear Model 4.0 Golf Push Cart
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.