The Golf Ball Rollback Is Likely Being Delayed. What Does It Mean?
News

The Golf Ball Rollback Is Likely Being Delayed. What Does It Mean?

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

The Golf Ball Rollback Is Likely Being Delayed. What Does It Mean?

Let’s rewind to December 2023 when everyone had an opinion about the USGA and R&A’s proposed golf ball rollback.

Boy, does that feel like ages ago.

The schedule for implementing the rollback was originally set at 2028 for the pros and 2030 for all golfers including the average recreational player.

That now appears to be changing as golf’s governing bodies are signaling there probably won’t be two dates for the implementation of the rollback.

It is looking more likely that all golfers—from PGA Tour players to weekend hackers—will be rolling things back at the same time in January 2030.

What does it all mean? Let’s get into it.

What is the rollback?

You’ll be forgiven if you forget the nitty-gritty details of the rollback. It’s been a couple of years. The target dates were so far in the future that it wasn’t exactly top of mind for golfers over the past little while.

The specific details: The USGA and R&A, as golf’s governing bodies, told golf ball manufacturers that, in order to be considered conforming, future golf balls can travel only 317 yards (+/- three yards) at 125 mph of clubhead speed with an 11-degree launch angle and no more than 2,220 rpm of spin. The current guideline specifies the same distance but at 120-mph clubhead speed, 10-degree launch angle and 2,520 rpm. The rules would apply to all golfers.

The TLDR: Essentially that means we’ll all be playing a shorter, higher-launching and lower-spinning golf ball. It’s believed Tour pros will lose around 10 to 15 yards off their drives with faster swing speed players seeing the biggest reductions. Amateurs would see distance reductions but not to the same extent.

Golf’s governing bodies gave manufacturers an advance notice to implement the new manufacturing process over a two-phase system with professional golfers and other elite golfers being accounted for first in 2028.

But now that schedule could be shifting

The rollback is moving forward; it’s just a matter of when it will happen.

The original point of having two dates for the rollback was to give manufacturers more time to rework product lines and build a deeper catalog of conforming balls for recreational players.

Retailers could also sell existing inventory more easily while weekend players weren’t rushed into a change.

But in a letter released Jan. 16, the governing bodies said they are reconsidering the timeline due to comments from stakeholders who, once they had gotten into their own implementation process with design and prototypes, realized that 2028 might be too soon.

The USGA and R&A are now opening up a period for official feedback to see if the two-phase system should go into one phase.

Another problem is that some manufacturers feel that having two dates could create logistical challenges such as golf shops selling balls that are legal for one player and not legal for another.

Those manufacturers would have to manage overlapping products and expiration dates, trying to educate golfers about whether their ball is conforming based on which competition they are in.

Responses to the letter are due by Feb. 15 and we can expect a decision sometime after that point.

But reading between the lines, it seems likely the date will be shifted to 2030. It provides more time for manufacturers to prepare and may also give some space for the PGA Tour and PGA of America to get on board with the changes.

The PGA of America has been highly critical of the changes. The Tour, meanwhile, doesn’t see the need to alter its product. Conversations between the USGA, PGA Tour and PGA of America have been ongoing but there is no real indication which way they are trending.

What does this mean?

This update means nothing to the recreational player. You can still expect a rollback coming in four years.

But in terms of the professional game and other elite competitions, the distance “issue” feels like it is being kicked down the road once again.

“Unity” has been an important buzzword for the golf industry. It’s one of the primary reasons why all golfers are being rolled back instead of just those in elite competitions—this decision would align with that rallying cry.

But many are commenting that it does seem increasingly ridiculous that all of this is being done over a dozen or so yards of distance.

In four years, pros will probably be hitting the ball farther and negating the effect of these regulations so some people feel the rollback should be harsher or not exist at all.

Rory McIlroy, a proponent of rolling the ball back, recently said that even 2028 seemed too late to be making these kind of changes.

“We’re frustrated as players and as an industry because the lead times these equipment companies have been given to figure it out … by the time we play these balls in 2028, there’s not going to be a difference. Or the difference is going to be so marginal that it’s not going to make a difference.”

We’ll toss it over to you, MGS reader. What do you think of the rollback update?

For You

For You

News
Jun 29, 2026
One Driver Brand Is Three-For-Three In Majors. But It’s Not Dominating The Season
Chambers Bay Chambers Bay
News
Jun 29, 2026
Where Should The New Tour Championship Be Played?
Golf Pride Stars and Stripes Zero Taper putter grip Golf Pride Stars and Stripes Zero Taper putter grip
Golf Grips
Jun 29, 2026
These New Limited-Edition 4th of July Putter Grips Are A Little Bit Rock ‘N’ Roll, A Little Bit Country
Sean Fairholm

Sean Fairholm

Sean Fairholm

Sean is a longtime golf journalist and underachieving 10 handicap who enjoys the game in all forms. If he didn't have an official career writing about golf, Sean would spend most of his free time writing about it anyway. When he isn't playing golf, you can find Sean watching his beloved Florida Panthers hockey team, traveling to a national park or listening to music on his record player. He lives in Nashville with his wife, Anja, and dog, Hogan.

Sean Fairholm

Sean Fairholm

Sean Fairholm

My 7 Favorite Emerging Trends In Golf
Jun 30, 2026 | 19 Comments
The 7 Most Annoying Trends In Golf
Jun 26, 2026 | 139 Comments
The 10 Best Active Players Without A Major
Jun 24, 2026 | 5 Comments
6 Big Ways The PGA Tour Is About To Change
Jun 23, 2026 | 17 Comments
Sean Fairholm

Sean Fairholm

Sean Fairholm

 
Sean Fairholm

Sean Fairholm

Sean Fairholm





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      john

      5 months ago

      recreational golfers should not be subjected to this. there is no reason for someone like me who hits driver 250 to 260 to have to hit a shorter ball. if the pga tour and the r&a feel a local rule is necessary i am ok with it. there is a big difference in those of us who pay to play golf and those who get paid to play golf, unity is not always the right answer. it will also be a problem for local tournaments and scrambles as people will use older balls. what are we going to do at our club championships? have a ball checker go through everyone’s bag.

      Reply

      DaveyD

      5 months ago

      Yep, that’s what we need- rec golfers to do a round of golf in five hours instead of four. Roll back the balls on those golfers and you’ll increase the distances they’re forced to hit with each club. Most rec golfers will run out and buy the now-nonconforming balls and use them, anyways.
      Golf shops will be forced to have the newer conforming balls on the shelves for longer periods of time. They must be overjoyed with that prospect.

      Reply

      M. Collins

      5 months ago

      Exaggerate much?
      I’m 66. I used to walk to and from school, uphill both ways, in 2′ of snow.

      So, this golfball rollback thingy would add like 10 yards per drive, with 14 fairways, that’s an additional 140 yards, or, the equivalent of one additional 8-iron shot.

      Circa early ’90s, my kid brother bought a shiny new “Big Bertha” driver. It was shockingly big, at 190cc. Today, my TaylorMade Qi10 3-wood is bigger than that – and any 460cc driver is akin to an alien spacecraft, at least to my eye.

      Currently, I game a TaylorMade r7 Quad mini-driver at 305cc (11.5°), just based on principle – any bigger club than that and I’ll feel like I’m cheating.

      Dial it ALL back.
      Bring it ALL back down to jelly roll.
      Driver: 400cc, maximum.
      Standardize the lofts of each and every iron: 7-iron should be 30° loft, no more no less.
      Standardize the golf ball: 300 yards maximum distance using a 400cc driver.
      Now, get off my lawn…

      Reply

      Eric

      5 months ago

      Hopefully it does get delayed and then eventually canceled completely. I’d like to see something like shrinking driver heads first and see what kind of effect that has for the pros. I also think more amateurs would be ok playing (hypothetically) illegal 460cc drivers, if the USGA said the max was 420cc. Companies could still sell 460cc versions of clubs for the weekend player, while pros and more serious ams can play/buy the 420cc versions.

      Reply

      M. Collins

      5 months ago

      Wow.
      I see a lot of wailing and gnashing of teeth, over not being able to hit a golf ball so far that one has to recharge the golf cart in order to track it down…
      Wow.

      A baseball (in theory) is made to conform to exacting standards, and it presents the same for every player.
      The same can be said for a basketball, a tennis ball, a ping-pong ball, a hockey puck, etc. Same exacting standards.

      Why all the huffing and puffing?
      Look, we’re running out of fairway – and, water…
      Standardize the ball, and standardize the clubs, and then we’ll see who can really play golf.
      Sheesh.

      Reply

      BD57

      5 months ago

      Players are taller, they’re stronger, they’re generating more clubhead speed – of course the. ball goes farther.

      IMO, a ball that spun more would make the game more difficult for the pros.

      Reply

      Hands off my balls.

      5 months ago

      Have pro tourneys on certain courses with no drivers or fairway woods. Unique and intriguing. Hands off my balls.

      Reply

      John

      5 months ago

      Is MLB going to change the hardness of their baseball to keep it inside the ballpark? Is the USTA going to soften the tennis ball so to players don’t hit it so fast ,etc,etc? Might be time to pick the fly rod up and give up this expensive sport.

      Reply

      Randy p

      5 months ago

      I’ve been playing this game a long time. I’m 71 years old, this game is hard enough the way it is. Now the dumbasses of the USGA and RNA wanna change the golf ball. These guys just don’t get it in a couple years. These younger golfers are gonna have it figured out and you’re gonna be right back to where you started with this golf ball. I like the idea what this gentleman said earlier about making the golf courses tougher bring those fairways in a lot and grow the rough 4 to 6 inches long and the further you go the more narrow the fairway gets. I for one will never never buy the newer golf ball. I will stock up on the old ones. I might even buy some illegal ones. I’m not a tournament player. I just played for the love of the game. and the person that made this comment about for the senior player only be about two or 3 yards well after a while those two and 3 yards add up so screw your idea.

      Reply

      AvidDuffer

      5 months ago

      I agree with you. Will buy 32 dozen balls if I have to before the change. My average drive is currently 196 yards. I don’t need a limiting ball.

      League Golfer

      5 months ago

      If you want the pros drives to be 10 yards shorter, let the height of the grass in the fairways be 3/8 of an inch higher or maybe 1/2 an inch higher. Have you seen in person or on tv how much the pros drives bound down the fairways? Then, after the ball stops bounding down the fairway, it bounces for a while, and then it rolls on the pro tours’ “green-like” length grass in the fairways. So the pros get all this extra roll-out on their incredibly smooth and “fast” fairways. And the pro tours, for entertainment and tv ratings purposes, would much rather show you a “product” where the players are shooting lower numbers, so with the exception of the US Open, the pro tours are going to have their courses set up for scoring. The pro tours don’t want longer grass in their fairways, they want their players to get incredibly long drives. There aren’t many golf courses that have the roll out on the fairways like the pro tours do. But the USGA can’t easily make the pro tours grow their fairways a smidge longer, so they propose this shorter golf ball crap.

      Reply

      Tom Forsythe

      5 months ago

      That’s a great idea. Simple too.

      Reply

      Marlin Fowler

      5 months ago

      If it’s only 10 to 15 yards for a pro then why even bother? Even with club and ball improvements I don’t think our (recreational) handicaps have improved that much over the years. Take the time and money that will be wasted implementing this and use it make pro courses more penal if the USGA is so worried about it.

      Reply

      dhb10844

      5 months ago

      Well, on the club manufacturing side of things; we should see more 11 Woods made, and in the PGA Pro’s bags, then.

      Reply

      Peejer

      5 months ago

      Roll back the pro’s ball if you feel it’s necessary. But I’ve stock piled 42 dozen balls and won’t be rolling back for 10+ years!!

      Reply

      FEDUPCALIFORNIAN

      5 months ago

      Same. Fixing the unbroken was VERY 2023.

      Reply

      Robin Crosbie

      5 months ago

      Let’s face it you’ll still be able to buy what are versions of the balls that we’re all be playing with now – they’ll just be labeled as non-conforming and virtually every recreational golf will play with them – why pay good money for a decent driver and then tee up a ball that doesn’t go as far ?

      Reply

      Mike

      5 months ago

      Ha! A man after my own heart! I have hundreds of virtually brand new premium balls that I’ve come across. Rollback or not, I’m still going to play them all till they’re gone. The rollback is the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard. So the ball gets rolled back 15 yd for a pro, how the hell is that going to make any course less obsolete?

      Reply

      John Paton

      5 months ago

      JP Australia
      Agree with most of what Chris has said – the game will continue to be abused and changed until it doesn’t exist except on a screen.
      Changing the ball will not matter because it’s not about caring/assisting the game – let’s stop trying to fool the public – it’s about money(manufacturers and Pro’s) the latter of which, like all professional sports people, play games for voment like disgusting amounts of reward that if their doctor wanted the same would be “up in arms” at.
      Simply take everything, except the significant improvements to agronomy, back to the 70’s or thereabouts and all the great courses are back and everybody again has learn the game with, to quote a person of the past, “implements ill designed for the purpose” instead of now not being able to hit a crooked shot off your 45 handicap.

      Reply

      mg

      5 months ago

      As messed up as the game of golf has become make the course 10,000 yards. The new wave woke architects are all in.

      Reply

      Turtlehacker

      5 months ago

      Sounds like we average joe golfers should file a class action law suit against the USGA and R&A against the golf ball rollback.

      Reply

      FEDUPCALIFORNIAN

      5 months ago

      1000% truth

      Reply

      Bill

      5 months ago

      Good luck on that class action lawsuit. Adam Scott tried that when they tried to ban Anchoring the putter the USGA is their own entity It will be thrown out. They can do what they want to do. Even though I’m on the amateur golfer side, the Golf ball rollback is legitimately The dumbest decision they have ever made. They’ve already made these courses longer.
      What they should do is just cap it where it’s at. Don’t let technology keep going just cap it. They like to be difficult And fucking dumb it’s not going to do anything to the game. Just like when they banned anchoring the putter, there was no one who anchored the putter that was dominating the game. The guy that was dominating the game at that time was tiger Fucking woods it’s not like anchoring took over and they were dominating the game that was completely false! It’s really the only sport that’s constantly fucking with the rules Changing shit, they’re ridiculous They’re pathetic I think they’re a bad organization. My instinct tells me that there’s no board that votes on these things. It seems like that there’s one person, that’s at the very top That dictates all of this! Because common sense, if you look at all the comments that should tell you, they couldn’t possibly all come to the same vote to vote this golf ball Rollback, there’s not one person in agreement with it I don’t care what platform you look at? Everybody disagrees with it, and you mean to tell me that the USGA has a board and they all agree to roll in the ball back. I don’t think so.Fuck the usga and everything they stand for

      Reply

      Clarence Combs

      5 months ago

      I’ve been saying this for two years. Amateur distance is stagnant according to studies. To penalize us because the USGA is butt hurt because the champions of the US Open are shooting under par, yeah, I think the legal system should be used. I’m 59, getting back surgery this month and they’re going steal another 15 yards besides what Father Time is taxing me ..

      Reply

      Tom Wishon

      5 months ago

      There are SO MANY valid points that contributors here have made which all lead to the same conclusion – the USGA/R&A making yet another bad decision fueled by ignorance and catering to the rich/elite clubs in disregard to wants and needs of the tens of millions of regular golfers. I should say it’s mostly the USGA starting this because if/when the R&A disagrees, the USGA puts the pressure on to fall in step. Remember the USGA enacting the COR limit in 98? The R&A said no. From 98 to 08 there was no limit on COR in R&A countries. Early in 99 over 60 players on the Euro Tour were using a high COR driver. By season end, only 3 still were using one because they learned the increased distance resulted in fewer fairways hit which resulted in more chances for bogey. During that time not one Euro Tour event was one with a high COR driver. Yet the R&A finally succumbed to the USGA’s pressure to adopt the COR limit in 08 because the USGA simply did not want this difference in the rules.

      Or how about the new scoreline change in irons and wedges in 2010? Done to get rid of “bomb and gouge” to reward keeping the ball in the fairway. That one also failed miserably. Golf World charted approach shots from the rough in 2011 on the PGA Tour and found that players with the new grooves made more birdies and pars from the rough than they did with the old grooves in 2010. The USGA continues to ignore the fact that these players on tour are GOOD and getting better.

      As many have said here, following an argument that was tried during the debate on the COR rule, if you want to truly reel back the bombers, grow the rough, narrow the fairways and taper their width – the farther out, the more narrow. It’ll have to be 6″ rough because the 100mph speed of pros with an iron can tear through 4″ rough without a whole lot of problems. But don’t ever bet on that happening – the litigation paranoid USGA under advice from their army of lawyers will fear action by pros who might strain a wrist.

      Best thing I can advise from reading everyone’s comments is for everyone here to write the USGA with your comments and hope for the best. That and as one guy said, put your orders in for normal balls to keep yourself in stock early in 2029!!

      You guys are so right to say that 10-15 yds is meaningless, especially because as you say, training/better athletes will more than erase that. Look at the college kids clubhead speed and talent compared to even 10-15 yrs ago.

      Reply

      FEDUPCALIFORNIAN

      5 months ago

      Well said sir

      Reply

      Andrew from Oz

      5 months ago

      Think about the effect rolling back the ball has for us 99%. Without great technique and strike we are likely to lose more than the 10 to 15 yards, and don’t forget there are plenty of us in the world who do not have multiple tees to choose from. Its not just the 10 to 15 yards off the tee it’s also the 6 to 10 on the next shot with a 5 iron or hybrid so the cumulative loss for us amateurs could be up to 16 to 25 yards per hole. All of a sudden you have par 4’s lots of older golfers now cannot reach in two. This issue should be managed by course superintendants on how they setup a course to play.

      Reply

      Greg

      5 months ago

      Let’s go back to the feathery. And wooden shafts. And tee boxes right next to greens. And wagon ruts. And clubs made especially to extricate the ball from wagon ruts. And teeing the ball on hillocks of sand and dirt. And a 79 is like a 59. You want a rollback? Then let’s not be hypocrites about it. Let’s do it right.

      Reply

      Nick wainwright

      5 months ago

      Just Ban tee pegs for pros.
      Problem solved!

      Reply

      mg

      5 months ago

      Im all in. and we could play in under 3 1\2

      Reply

      HeftyLefty

      5 months ago

      The distance lost with the ball won’t be that significant for the pros or amateurs. The USGA and R & A lost the battle years ago. The real problem is when driver shafts were allowed to be so long with driver heads the size of a softball. Add to this iron lofts that are 2 clubs longer and shafts that are 1/2″ to 3/4″ inch longer. The result is what you are seeing now. Also, today’s pro is in much fitter than even 20 years ago and that can’t be legislated.

      Reply

      Steve

      5 months ago

      If stakeholders for Pro and Elite Competitions need to limit distances I’d prefer to see loft rules put in place.

      The manufacturers will have to pass along the additional R&D costs of rolling back a ball to the buyer, golf equipment is already expensive enough, continuing to hurt a sport that is tougher to access compared to others.

      Reply

      DougEB

      5 months ago

      Golf course superintendents could easily solve this “problem” on the pro tour courses with no disruption and practically no cost. I agree with most that the rollback is the stupidest idea in the history of golf. No apology to Rory and Jack.

      Reply

      Rob231

      5 months ago

      Total agreement!!

      Reply

      Richard

      5 months ago

      Leave the ball alone just make the pros use shorter shafted drivers and SHORTER TEE PEGS 2inches instead of 4 inches the answer is so simple

      Reply

      Joe Cook

      5 months ago

      I agree, the roll back is the worst idea in the history of the game

      Reply

      FEDUPCALIFORNIAN

      5 months ago

      Completely agree!!!

      Reply

      Mark

      5 months ago

      Let’s set aside the topic of does it matter if the elite of the elite hit the ball too far for a moment. That’s a separate topic that can be debated on its own merits. In a article from 2024, Golf Monthly estimated there are between 40 and 68 million golfers in the world, depending how you define the term “golfer.” Regardless of which number is more accurate, the plan to roll back golf balls simply because the top lets say 5,000 players in the world hit the ball too far is asinine. If you take the low end of Golf Monthly estimate of 40 million golfers, this rule change is being enacted because of .0125% of all golfers. I don’t care if I only lose 1 yard when I absolutely pure a driver, that is too much. Golf is so damn hard already, let’s not make it any harder for 99.9875% of players simply because .0125% hit the ball too far.

      Reply

      Andrew the Great!

      5 months ago

      “…simply because the top lets say 5,000 players in the world hit the ball too far is asinine” ~ and not just asinine, but asinine on steroids. The rollback would be so miniscule (what, 10-15 yards?) that no only would it have zero impact when implemented, it would be overcome in very short order by fitness, technology, nutrition, and technique.

      The picayune amount of rollback would do literally NOTHING to bring back ANY of the “classic courses” that the rollback fanatics wax apoplectic about.

      If they REALLY wanted to bring back the classic tracks and make a meaningful impact on the pro game, they’d roll the ball back > 50 yards. But of COURSE they won’t do that, because they’d be tarred-and-feathered.

      This is just more of the classic utter stupidity the morons running the USGA and the R&A are well-known for.

      Reply

      TBone

      5 months ago

      Absolutely agree. If the changes are because of the pros, then only the pros should be affected. Leave the regular players alone.

      Reply

      Chris

      5 months ago

      Why can’t we just roll the pros back 50-70 yards? And leave us jabronis alone. What does that do?
      1) Instantly no course is obsolete
      2) You have many tee boxes to choose from and do not need to have the tees on the back of the back tee box on every hole
      3) Maybe we never (or at least for many years) have to build a new back tee box anywhere to hold a pro event
      4) Improve pace of play by eliminating the need to walk back 70 yards from a lot of greens (then an extra 70 yards forward again).
      5) there would be en entertaining equipment race to see who could develop the best “slow” ball (which Titleist would hate and would probably sue the universe over)
      6) When they show those scatter plots of the drives on each hole Rory and Potgeiter are still going to be 20 by everyone, just in a different spot hitting a different iron (or the same spot from 1-2 tees forward)
      7) You can convince me do 40 yards with the ball and go back to 190 cc drivers and blade irons only. Why is the game being easier for the pros better for anyone (except their outsized egos).

      Other than affecting “the industry” (too bad so sad) someone needs to tell me why that does not make a world of sense.

      Reply

      Andrew the Great!

      5 months ago

      Agreed.

      As I mention elsewhere, if they REALLY wanted to bring back the classic tracks and make a meaningful impact on the pro game, they’d roll the pro ball back > 50 yards. But of COURSE they won’t do that, because they’d be tarred-and-feathered.

      This is just more of the classic utter stupidity the morons running the USGA and the R&A are well-known for.

      Reply

      Lou Caracappa

      5 months ago

      Sorry, distance is not the issue and the longer you make courses, the more it plays into the hands of the bomber. People love the bomb. I would rather see Rory or Bryson hit driver than watch a Corey Pavin bunt one out straight.

      Also, leave the ball alone for us recreational golfer. I am 65 and have lost distance on my drive. Do I really need to lose even more? I will stock up on current balls and never buy one of the new ones.

      If you want to eliminate the bomb and gauge make missing the fairway more penal. Grow out the rough for tournament golf or narrow the fairways. That puts all golfers in play

      Reply

      Gary Ahlert

      5 months ago

      Part of the fun of any sporting endeavor is to fantasize about playing like a pro. It’s part of the game and it’s what makes it wonderful. What’s maddening is the fact that all the attention on the rollback has been made about the ball. Nonsense. Pro golfers, and other athletes too, are in far better physical shape, the equipment they use is better and in general their approach to the game and how it is played has gotten better too. Roll back the ball? You will only destroy the game. Bi-furcation the same thing will happen. I want to go out and hit the ball like my hero…or at least pretend I can do so. Why is that the governing bodies continue to do things which only hurt the game of golf rather than help or grow it? You want to make courses less accessible to long hitters? Narrow the fairways, grow the rough, more hazards and so on. Stop trying to destroy our great game.    

      Reply

      Chris

      5 months ago

      I think I am in favour of doing something (big picture) about distance in the pro game, but if the only options are :
      1) this current half baked watered down plan and
      2) doing nothing

      then I would select do nothing.

      Reply

      Jeff Murphy

      5 months ago

      This is such a disparate idea. How can the manufacturers, organizations, and tours promote “grow the game” and then take away yardage from us average guys and gals? This makes absolutely no sense on the amateur level. Over 3/4 of the people who play have no idea what the OB and penalty area rules are, nor do they care. The same amount, or more, think it is standard to get improved or near perfect lies on every single shot. We all play with people who naturally “roll” the ball immediately upon walking up to it. They have no idea how to access a lie as they always have a perfect lie. So we strongly encourage golfers to participate in the GHIN for any and all tournament style play in the name of fairness, but we want to make it more difficult? Geez, think it through! Laughable. Double max, right?

      Reply

      Ronan

      5 months ago

      The USGA has it’s own tee it forward campaign because people are playing from tees that are too long for them but at the same time is rolling the ball back? Square that circle for me.

      Reply

      Beak

      5 months ago

      Totally agree.

      Reply

      Lou Caracappa

      5 months ago

      That is a great comment – and proves that the ball rollback is misguided and harmful

      Reply

      Matt Vincent

      5 months ago

      Change maximum clubs allowed to 12 and make a maximum loft for a sand / lob wedge 56 degrees
      Bring some skill and creativity back

      Reply

      Michael

      5 months ago

      The whole idea from its inception was ill-conceived. Go back to the origins – the complaint was that the improvement in skill and equipment was making the classic courses obsolete! Is a 10-15 yard reduction off the tee for Pros and high skilled players really going to change that, especially as club manufacturers continue to innovate? This is not even a 1 club difference for those players. Additionally, when the new ball comes into play, there will be the same complaint about course obsolesce as clubs, skill and golf fitness improve. To me, the answer is not to penalize the recreational golfer because the Pros can dissect a course with their distance, but to set up the courses for tournaments that reward precision, not bombing it. Narrow fairways, higher rough, trap placement, and features such as trees, water and fescue can make any course a challenge for any player. Don’t hurt the recreational golfer for a change that is not going to address the underlying issue. And who cares if -25 wins a tournament? At this level, par is artificial anyway. For instance, how many par 5s on the Tour are unreachable in 2 shots, as they typically are for us.

      Reply

      REC911

      5 months ago

      If the USGA is worried that the gear is taking away the “skill” needed, then change all par fives to par fours for the pros. It seems that the gear allows most pros to reach most par fives in two now so they would be putting for birdies instead of eagle. Par 71 for 18 would change to Par 67 for the pros.
      We hackers can keep everything the same since we are playing for fun.

      Change the par not the gear to create whatever “traditions” you are trying to keep with scores being too low or gear making golf too easy.

      All the gear has been regulated all along anyway so rolling it back makes no sense just because humans have increased their skills in golf.

      To solve the issue I suggest that the PGA pick one of the majors each year and do a retro tournament that requires all participants to wear three piece suits, wood shafted/head drivers, feather balls, wood shaft irons and spiked shoes that mess up the greens and make it hard to putt and compare scores from todays pros vs old pros. This should prove how much the changes have made the game easier. (or not)

      I would watch that!

      Reply

      Josh B

      5 months ago

      Can see there are few people in these comments who have appreciation for golf course design, architecture, and sustainability. Sports like tennis and baseball have taken serious steps to address their games through equipment regulation and/or bifurcation and their games have been better for it. Unfortunately manufacturers have soiled their diapers about it and the players they sponsor (minus Rory, huge props to him) lick boot as their mouthpiece as well.
      The R&A and USGA wanted to pursue changes for the pro game only, leaving the amateur game untouched. Unfortunately the manufacturers cut that down.
      The greatness of Scottie and Rory would only be magnified with a ball that flies shorter and is more susceptible to wind. Same with drivers that sustain ball speed imposters (Wyndham Clark’s drive on 18 at the ’23 US Open should have been off the planet) instead of rewarding elite ball striking.
      The truly great venues of golf have gone through more change in the last 30 years than the proceeding 100+. The governing bodies waited too long to make minor corrections and now this mess is the price to be paid.

      Reply

      Mark R

      5 months ago

      Rollback is going to be a mess.
      Lots of recreational & league golfers like to wager. My Thursday night league pays out $900-1400 to the winner each week. I can guarantee some guys will be putting non-conforming balls into play to gain an edge.
      We’re going to need golf ball police.

      Reply

      REC911

      5 months ago

      agreed. the new balls would need to have some universal “mark” on them so everyone knows its the new standard.

      Reply

      Bob T

      5 months ago

      Rolling back technology to prevent a few hundred people from ‘hitting the ball too far’ out of the millions of golfers globally is one of the dumbest ideas ever. Two solutions – have a ‘Tour only’ ball spec for all pros and leave the rest of us alone, or simply take driver out of the bag for pro tour players. It would have the same effect.

      Reply

      Doug

      5 months ago

      I like the idea of pros not having driver, mini driver or 3 wood and leave the damn ball alone. Some pros hit a 15 deg 3 wood 300 yds so, 5 woods in is.

      Reply

      DPGolfer

      5 months ago

      Tour only sounds like a simple solution, but remember college golfers are some of the longest hitters on the planet. Which ball should they use, and if elite amateurs need to use the ‘tour’ ball at what level do you draw the line?

      Reply

      Steve

      5 months ago

      If courses are becoming obsolete, the problem is for the pros and elite amateurs, they can use a competition or tour only ball which rolls their distance back. For the other millions of golfers, leave it alone. MLB doesn’t allow aluminum bats and people tune in to watch even though the equipment is different. The USGA is so out of touch.

      Reply

      Dr Tee

      5 months ago

      No recreational golfer wants to hit the ball shorter !!!
      The emphasis on club design is and has always recently been to hit the ball further and make designs faster
      There is NO reason why BIFURCATION cannot be implemented–a rolled back ball for pro competition if the powers that be say so, and recreational balls for the rest of us !!!!

      Reply

      albatrossx4

      5 months ago

      Simple the manufacturers told the USGA to piss off they were not making 2 product lines. And I will bet anyone that in the end the MFC’s will develop a ball that conforms but does not lose anything for slower swing speeds, they likely exist in the “soft” product lines and MGS has shown they are already slower.

      Reply

      Baja Steve

      5 months ago

      Manufacturers may say they hate bifurcation, but they already make a bunch of different spec balls and ‘tour spec’ balls that only have limited availability to the public. So the notion that making a line of tour only balls alongside their existing lines of recreational balls is somehow a major burden on them seems hollow.
      The only burden they face is the expense of the R&D required to develop balls that can comply with the new requirements.
      Now from a strictly personal POV as someone who’s north of 70, I’d love to see some golf balls that actually help all us average players (you know, the people that the game actually relies on financially) enjoy the game more. I can’t hit it out of my shadow anymore, and hate having to play the shorter tees.

      Reply

      Mikey

      5 months ago

      The messaging from the USGA and R&A when the rollback was revealed was nonsense. Here is an example “The average golfer won’t notice” AND in the same issued statement “We need to protect the integrity of the game!”

      You can’t have it both ways.

      I’m sure Rory knows a lot about how players on tour feel about the rollback, but truly, the rollback is being introduced to protect a handful of nostalgic courses from being overpowered by PGA Tour Pros.

      The better solution would have been to have venue-specific balls for those tournaments. Instead, the governing bodies totally fumbled the announcement and messaging so badly that I am now distrustful in their abilities to govern the sport.

      The rollback is BEYOND LAME!

      Reply

      Oregon golfer

      5 months ago

      Agreed. Make the mini driver the longest club as a local rule for some elite events at classic courses deemed too short for male tour pros. The mini will be a conforming club. All balls and clubs will be conforming so there is no need for bifurcation. Just implement the local rule for USGA/R&A elite men’s events. Let the PGA Tour decide whether or not to implement a local rule as needed at their venues. If the USGA wants a shorter ball, let them pay a ball manufacturer to design one for them just like the direct to consumer startups did. If they go through with the roll back, the PGA of America should start their own handicap system and allow the existing ball to be used for posted rounds. #DEFUNDGHIN

      Reply

      ctg44

      5 months ago

      The rollback is the single dumbest idea in golf since someone thought taking 4 1/2 hours for an 18-hole round was acceptable…and it might be the dumbest rule ever. Yes, pros hit the ball amazingly far. So what if an old course can no longer remain in the PGA Tour or majors rotations? I don’t really care…

      There are WAY too many visually stunning courses with the infrastructure to host a PGA Tour event to care about losing something on a boring course. Speaking of older courses? Has anyone torched Colonial for a -29 weekend yet? Yeah, didn’t think so, and it’s only 7,200-7,300 yards tipped out, and its hardest hole is a 476-yard Par 4, with a 413-yard Par 4 the 2nd hardest hole for the pros. Courses don’t need to be 7,600 yards to be tough. Plant some trees and grow some dense Bermuda rough. No one’s gone lower than -21 in the tournament ever, and that’s stood for 15 years already (and oh, that dude, Zach Johnson, hits fewer 300-yard drives NOW than I do at 52, so it wasn’t length that won that).

      Reply

      albatrossx4

      5 months ago

      Boring course, like Pebble Beach, Old Course, Merion, right, do you understand that this is the only way to keep the game sustainable into the future, bigger courses take more land, more water more chemicals and more fuel, is that something that the non-golfing public is going to support? NOPE, And moving bunkers, water etc, is also costly in time and money, growing rough is not just flip a switch. A US Open course takes 2 or 3 years to get the rough deep and thick, again using water and chemicals that more land can not sustain.

      Reply

      Doug

      5 months ago

      Could always change par on those classic courses for the pros. Turn some 4s to 3s and 5s to 4s. Make it a par 65.

      Will

      5 months ago

      Literally none of that is necessary. Courses don’t have to be made longer. Just accept that the very best in the world can shoot low scores. It isn’t a real problem.

      Jerry

      5 months ago

      I suspect that if the golf ball standards were changing in the other direction, i.e. they would allow for additional performance and speed, that the manufacturers would be able to comply within a very short period of time. Realize that dialing the ball back is only manufacturing a ball similar to what they had manufactured a few years ago based upon their claims that each generation of golf balls produces greater distance and ball speed.

      Reply

      James

      5 months ago

      I was never in favor of a rollback. If the tour is trying to protect “par” then make it 65 or 60 for the average course. These guys tend to be 20 below, so problem solved. Or they can try narrowing the fairways that are wide enough to land a jumbo jet on, grow the rough, etc. My last suggestion is for the PGA to make a “tour” ball which is the official ball that must be played at events. I know the ball manufacturers will hate this idea. But golf is the only sport you bring your own ball to the game at a professional level.

      Reply

      Bigman

      5 months ago

      Yup!

      Reply

      Bigman

      5 months ago

      The rollback is a mess for golf. It is nowhere near necessary for the recreational golfer. Even with all the advancements we’re told about, overall distance numbers are down among casual players.

      Reply

      TJD

      5 months ago

      This is the all-time biggest mistake in golf’s 500+ year history. I hope the completely daft USGA/R&A leadership comes to their senses and drops this.

      Reply

      Jeff Webb

      5 months ago

      So we should buy stock in golf ball manufacturers in 4Q 2029 when all the golfers go out and stock up on golf balls for the next few years prior to the rollback? LOL

      Reply

      Will

      5 months ago

      I’m disappointed in the ball manufacturers for not suing this away. It’s a (stupid) solution in search of a problem. The whole premise that the pros “hit the ball too far” is invalid to begin with. Oh, scores are “too low” from the very best in the world? Who says they’re too low? Why is that a problem? It’s not. It’s ridiculous to suggest that it is. And it’s even more ridiculous to reduce MY distance over it. Take a flying leap, “governing bodies.”

      Reply

      Steve Perry

      5 months ago

      In due time the legal battle will be coming. I never thought the rollback would ever make it to fruition. This is the first of many steps that will eventually lead to this being permanently removed. No one wants it especially the average golfer.

      We’ve already seen pros choose money over prestige and if the PGA tour and LIV both do not roll it back the majors will have to follow.

      Reply

      MGoBlue100

      5 months ago

      Couldn’t agree more, and came into the comments to use the “solution to a problem that doesn’t exist” line. Bunch of old dudes in tweed blazers with elbow patches shaking their fists in the air talking about the good old days while clutching their persimmon drivers.

      Reply

      Tim

      5 months ago

      Sounds a lot like when the Govt told the car manufacturers that they would need to go all electric by 2035 or whatever year. They all just fell in line like good little soldiers. Until the leadership changed and then the thinking changed. Maybe the new leadership of the PGA is wanting to slow this down???

      Reply

      Mike

      5 months ago

      When is the roll back coming on clubs every year or two these companies introduce new clubs that are more forgiving, longer and straighter than the previous clubs where do you draw the line.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    News
    Jun 29, 2026
    One Driver Brand Is Three-For-Three In Majors. But It’s Not Dominating The Season
    Chambers Bay Chambers Bay
    News
    Jun 29, 2026
    Where Should The New Tour Championship Be Played?
    Golf Pride Stars and Stripes Zero Taper putter grip Golf Pride Stars and Stripes Zero Taper putter grip
    Golf Grips
    Jun 29, 2026
    These New Limited-Edition 4th of July Putter Grips Are A Little Bit Rock ‘N’ Roll, A Little Bit Country