The Tour’s Working Class Won’t Shut Up Now That They’re Not Being Coddled
News

The Tour’s Working Class Won’t Shut Up Now That They’re Not Being Coddled

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

The Tour’s Working Class Won’t Shut Up Now That They’re Not Being Coddled

The PGA Tour has been going through an overhaul the past few years.

Fewer full-time Tour cards awarded. More emphasis on the signature events. And, perhaps coming soon to a theater near you, fewer events altogether.

In short, the Tour is looking to put a greater emphasis on competition while catering to its more valuable players. Play well or beware.

For decades, veteran Tour players have been given exemption after exemption—past champion, career money, etc.—as careers get endlessly extended based on previous accomplishments. These players could make a schedule of 12 to 15 lower-tier events, clinging on to their glory days and squeezing whatever juice remains of their dwindling careers.

Now that the Tour is taking those opportunities away, the journeymen who have benefited are pissed.

And they have no right to be pissed

I’m going to pick on Ryan Moore, a veteran Tour player who recently tore into the Tour during an interview with Golfweek.

Moore is the latest (but certainly not the first) in a long list of Tour vets who have come out of the woodwork to dump on the league that gave them a platform in the first place.

In this interview, Moore, like others before him, says the Tour has abandoned its middle-class.

“I feel like the first 10 years I was on Tour they appreciated people in my position who had been there, done that,” Moore said. “They did everything to kind of create some playing opportunity for past champions; they appreciated that player a lot more.

“Now they’re like, ‘What have you done for me lately? Please go away. Go away as fast as you can. You mean nothing to us.’ Like, that’s how I feel. My issue with everything they’ve done is they just throw everything out there, claim there’s a trickle down, but it doesn’t trickle down past 20 players. Everything the Tour is doing is working against you and you feel like you’re beating your head against the wall.”

Let’s reset for a moment.

Imagine you are a bench player in the NBA. You can eat a few minutes and average four points a game and serve a small role on your team. Every now and then, you make a meaningful impact. You make your money and keep your spot throughout your career.

But at a certain point, you are not serving that role anymore. You are not one of the best 13 players on your team. You would not be one of the best 13 players on any team.

Should the NBA call one of their teams and say, “Hey, guys, let’s prolong this dude’s career a few more years. Can you keep playing him?”

No, of course not. Virtually every sport in the world is based on competition.

Yes, there are contracts signed. But in terms of the product and who gets in the game, it is purely a meritocracy.

What sports league would defend a player who is no longer competitive?

The answer is the PGA Tour. The Tour was going to bat for its has-beens, carving out playing opportunities so players who haven’t been relevant for 10 years could ride off into the sunset.

That philosophy contributed to the bloated nature of professional golf. It’s part of why there are so many (too many) tournaments. It’s part of why the Tour was so susceptible to LIV coming in and snatching players.

Moore should be grateful, not spiteful

For those who don’t know, Ryan Moore had a very nice career in golf.

He was a standout amateur, winning the U.S. Amateur and NCAA Championship in the same year while at UNLV. Only four other golfers in history have done that.

Moore won five times on the Tour (all lower-tier events) but fell short of the lofty expectations people had for him coming out of college. In 42 major starts, he never finished better than T9. He was a pretty forgettable figure, a journeyman who had a few meaningful moments, such as qualifying for the 2016 Ryder Cup.

And Moore made more than $34 million in his career. He did pretty damn well for 20 years.

He’s 43 years old and basically finished as a competitive golfer at the highest level.

Now he wants to be coddled like those before him.

“They have no idea what they’re doing,” Moore said when asked about his Tour playing opportunities this year. “They keep saying a lot of things that turn out to be very wrong.

“If you go back three or four years ago with the exact same status, I would have played in at least 12 tournaments, maybe as much as 14-15, with fall (events) and with opposites and all that kind of stuff. But certainly a solid 12 and I think I got in four last year.”

What a shame. What a shame the Tour is transitioning to a more competitive model and you can’t have your retirement plan of taking a few victory laps so you can finish T45 at the Barracuda Championship.

You were just a random guy who brought minimal value to the more than 450 events you got to play on the Tour. The only people who specifically came to an event to watch you play were your family members and they didn’t even have to buy tickets.

You played golf on the best tour in the world for 20 years, reaping the benefits of a player who rarely rubbed elbows with the game’s elite.

And now you are shamelessly lobbying for the Champions Tour minimum age to be changed from 50 to 45 so you can go and make more money there.

It’s kind of embarrassing.

I’m glad the Tour is becoming more cutthroat

There is a balance to strike between competitiveness and ruthlessness.

Tour players can’t sign contracts and it would be a bridge too far to say one bad year should take a guy away from his livelihood.

At the same time, this is an entertainment product. The Tour won’t be successful if it’s constantly catering to the 150th-best player.

No other sport would do that. Once you can’t perform, you don’t play.

What do you think of Moore’s complaining about the Tour structure?

Let me know below in the comments.

Top Photo Caption: Ryan Moore isn’t happy with the Tour’s system. (GETTY IMAGES/Carmen Mandato)

For You

For You

News
Jun 29, 2026
One Driver Brand Is Three-For-Three In Majors. But It’s Not Dominating The Season
Chambers Bay Chambers Bay
News
Jun 29, 2026
Where Should The New Tour Championship Be Played?
Golf Pride Stars and Stripes Zero Taper putter grip Golf Pride Stars and Stripes Zero Taper putter grip
Golf Grips
Jun 29, 2026
These New Limited-Edition 4th of July Putter Grips Are A Little Bit Rock ‘N’ Roll, A Little Bit Country
Sean Fairholm

Sean Fairholm

Sean Fairholm

Sean is a longtime golf journalist and underachieving 10 handicap who enjoys the game in all forms. If he didn't have an official career writing about golf, Sean would spend most of his free time writing about it anyway. When he isn't playing golf, you can find Sean watching his beloved Florida Panthers hockey team, traveling to a national park or listening to music on his record player. He lives in Nashville with his wife, Anja, and dog, Hogan.

Sean Fairholm

Sean Fairholm

Sean Fairholm

My 7 Favorite Emerging Trends In Golf
Jun 30, 2026 | 15 Comments
The 7 Most Annoying Trends In Golf
Jun 26, 2026 | 139 Comments
The 10 Best Active Players Without A Major
Jun 24, 2026 | 5 Comments
6 Big Ways The PGA Tour Is About To Change
Jun 23, 2026 | 17 Comments
Sean Fairholm

Sean Fairholm

Sean Fairholm

 
Sean Fairholm

Sean Fairholm

Sean Fairholm





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Rose Fan

      5 months ago

      This is the worst take on professional golf by the “journalist”. Wish people would stop comparing golf to other sports, it is not the same as tennis or sports with teams. Golf will die if they keep dropping events and having closed shop tournaments. Stop trying to make golf like other failing sports….NBA and NFL. Popularity ebbs and flows, when another group of players come along that connects with people it will be popular again!

      Reply

      HikingMike

      5 months ago

      If it’s a problem, can’t they just pay less money for 45th place? I guess to whatever point someone can still make a living playing pro golf.

      “At the same time, this is an entertainment product. The Tour won’t be successful if it’s constantly catering to the 150th-best player.
      No other sport would do that. Once you can’t perform, you don’t play.”

      I checked NFL numbers. “Each NFL team maintains a 53-player active roster. Only 48 can dress for a game (plus one emergency quarterback)”. So NFL has way more players making good money. 32 teams * 53 players = 1,696.

      For NBA: “Teams are permitted to carry up to 21 players on their rosters”. There are 30 teams. 30 * 21 = 630.

      Is that the issue, the number of players? Probably not. Golf is very different from those sports. People watching on TV don’t see the 150th player on TV. There also aren’t locally televised events in 16 US metro areas where 32 teams are playing against each other. You have points, but comparing to other sports doesn’t work well.

      Reply

      Divot4224

      5 months ago

      Sean’s hit piece on Ryan Moore comes at an interesting time for the PGA Tour. Two long term sponsors are dropping sponsorship of their tournaments and three PGA players with full playing status for 2026 could not get into the field for the WM tournament. Also the new PGA leader, a football person, has stated that imposing scarcity in the golf product will increase popularity and viewership. While the NFL has been pushing for years to add a game to their season while playing games all over the world. In a sport that has been criticized for years over being too elitist, it would seem that cutting back to 22 tournaments a year and only including the top golfers with no cuts only adds weight to this criticism. Maybe sponsors have decided that paying $25 million dollars a year to host a tournament is not quite worth the cost considering the advertising and marketing benefits. Will the new PGA equity partners front the money to continue these tournaments? The short answer is “no”. Hence the new reduced schedule may be forced on the tour whether they like it or not.

      Finally, why would MyGolfSpy, an organization that deals in facts and actual data, post an opinionated hit piece in the first place? Seems to go against your standards.

      Reply

      Golfburkmi19

      5 months ago

      This article hits the nail on the head and is spot on. Ryan Moore was used as an example because it was recent, but there is truth in the article. The PGA Tour has too many events over too long of a calendar period. This is where LIV golf has gotten it right. Also, PGA Tour doesn’t need events with 156 players, when half of them don’t have a chance to win any how. I’ve never once tuned into a tour event or major to watch a Ryan Moore type or the lower tier players, that’s just simple math of entertainment value. Ryan Moore complaining about the system changing is simply a guy not able to come to terms with not being good enough anymore to keep his card. And another thing, please in the name of all things good get rid of all these exemptions. We don’t need a 60+ year old Vijay Singh using a lifetime earnings exemption to play PGA tour events.
      Pro golf at the highest level doesn’t need any more than 100-120 guys each week, and doesn’t need more that 16 events plus majors. Shorten the season from March 1 through mid-August.

      Reply

      USGAmember

      5 months ago

      I agree with creating more opportunities for up & coming players but reducing the field size isn’t going to do that. I’m surprised at how many people obsess over celebrity golfers. If you want to pique my interest, feature more mid-level public courses that I could afford to go out and play… and shame on the author for calling out that specific golfer by name!

      Reply

      Papa Bogey

      5 months ago

      I’m more often at odds with the authors views and hot takes. Not this time.

      The Tour has been trying to differentiate themselves from the LXXII tour. The PGA Tour is a tour of meritocracy. They get maximum points because you have to earn your way into the Tour. LXXII doesn’t. But having the skills to get on the tour doesn’t give you lifetime socialist-like income. I was in Myrtle beach a couple years ago and the tour had a stop locally. I thought I might stop by and watch a round. Cost for a Thursday round? $100. And I didn’t recognize a single player. Why would I pay $100 fo a bunch of bottom feeders. It’s mote fitting of a Korn Ferry stop, and $25 general admission than a Big Show tour stop.

      I’m retired now, but through my professional career I suffered through economic downturns and was laid off twice and finally “forced” into retirement. It was a fact of life for me and millions of other private sector workers. Each time I gathered new skills, found a new job and moved through life. Moore needs a life lesson …

      To the Moores of the world

      #learntocode

      Reply

      Harish Mohabir

      5 months ago

      Sport is about the best of the best competing against each other individually or as part of a team. I don’t mind signature events as they are as we all get to see the best and if any golfer wants to be part of that group, then earn the right to be there without any sense of entitlement. Perhaps non-signature full field events should should have 50% slots based on your Fedex Cup or World ranking and the other 50% should be players qualifying for the right to play. At the end of the day, being a professional golfer is a job and not a divine calling.

      PS. I do enjoy the Champions Tour for some of the competition but probably more for the nostalgia.

      Reply

      Brian

      5 months ago

      About the Author: Sean is an assclown who doesn’t know is ass from his elbow…..

      Reply

      Tully

      5 months ago

      He’s a journalist with an opinion.

      Reply

      USGAmember

      5 months ago

      So maybe he thinks he’s an elbow clown?

      Reply

      Golfburkmi19

      5 months ago

      Man seriously uncalled for. Your response was to attack the author which shows a low level of maturity. If you can’t actually provide a constructive response, please don’t post anything.

      Reply

      Mike from Georgia

      5 months ago

      Both arguments are right. We need to make room for younger talents. We need to allow twilight year players some extended glory. We dont need to overpay top 10 players.

      Tennis has a pretty good system. Ranking is based on how well you play in series of tournaments. Lot of new and old players rely on qualies to gain entry.

      Ok by me if golf moves to top 72 auto qualify
      Up to 48 play 9 holes on Monday. Only 24 make it.

      Reply

      Spooky

      5 months ago

      I think we’re looking through the eyeglass in reverse, here. Ryan Moore reminds me of someone like Brad Bryant. Brad was a grinder, who played 20+ years on tour, but didn’t hit his stride until he graduated to the Champions Tour, where he wonderstomped his way through multiple seasons. Some would have called him a placeholder on the PGA tour, but he served a legitimate purpose, like the pace car at a NASCAR event. Scott Dunlap (a.k.a. Mr. Par) was another of this ilk. The tour cannot exist on 150 ‘stars’. Freddie Couples is considered an ‘underachiever’ by many, when applying today’s standards…Yet, Freddie was a binding agent, that kept the previous generation attached to the current one. The fan base of the tour has favorites. Often these are players from the previous generation. These fans spend $ on events and merchandise, as well as supporting the club/ball companies that are directly tied to the tour. Likening professional golf to team sports is another mistake. It’s an apples to oranges comparison. While plenty of folks love(d) Michael Jordan, they understood that his contributions to the Bulls HAD to deteriorate with time. Golf is more like MMA or boxing. You KNOW your hero’s will become less competitive with time, but they aren’t letting a TEAM down with their diminished capacity. Paul Azinger’s return at the 2000 Sony Open is one example of this…as is Nicklaus’ 1986 Masters win. The tour relies on it’s grinders and stars of yesteryear segueing to the Champions Tour. It’s another revenue stream. In Azinger’s case, it transitioned to a 2008 Ryder Cup Captaincy and win. That might have looked weird if he had been relegated to the Champions Tour, prematurely or just given the boot, entirely. If the current incarnation of tour leadership feels it needs to scale back on the ‘legacy’ players, to make room for fresher faces, amidst a reduced playing schedule, so be it…but don’t blame those in the twilight of their careers for wanting to remain relevant or looking for an honorable exit. While Ryan Moore may not occupy the same tier as a Couples or Azinger, he nonetheless represents a tenured class that has a real and tangible fan base. He survived a long time in a very competitive environment and deserves the respect he has earned over many years of making money for the Tour, as well as himself.

      Reply

      Tully

      5 months ago

      Your comparison to the pace car is not relevant. The pace car is not in the race! Like comparing a pro golfer to a caddie. The caddie is not in the tournament

      Reply

      Sleepy DJT

      5 months ago

      TLDR

      Reply

      Jonathan S.

      5 months ago

      Ryan Moore was and is a phenomenal player and I believe there’s some merit to what he’s saying but the opposite has also been an issue – it’s insanely difficult for the best young talent to even get on tour. The tour is trying to walk that fine line between punishing the established player who hits a slump versus making the tour impossible to penetrate for up and coming talent. The rookie who emerges as an unbelievable talent and the 40+ veteran who comes out of nowhere for victory are both phenomenal stories that draw us in and keep us engaged. I will say this, fewer events and limiting the field does not seem like the way to solve the problem. There are fewer rookies this year (22 versus 35+ in past years) AND fewer spots for past winners like Moore.

      Reply

      Kevin

      5 months ago

      You can almost guess the age/generation based on the comments! All of us “has beens” came to a point in our competitive lives that we knew it was time to go. Either we knew it or got told!!! After 20 yrs and 34 million, what else are you “owed”??? My best response is….go start your own tour and pay everyone for as long as you’d like. The tour being more selective and creating more competitive exclusivity is just good business. In the end, if you dont like it then play better.

      Reply

      Jerry

      5 months ago

      The beauty of golf being an individual sport is that you get all the glory and when you do good and and you have to take responsibility for when you do bad. Ryan was not an upper tier golfer but he was good enough to win several PGA events. He should take pride in that. Can’t he play on the lower tier golf organizations

      Reply

      Charles Abinante

      5 months ago

      I agree with Ryan Moore, I personally like the previous method of the way tournaments were run and scheduled. Journeymen players can and DO win a tournament once in awhile just the same as my game is average most days but a couple times a year I play my ass off and shoot under my age! Hardly anyone out of the top 25 win, but it is thrilling to see a journeyman win! Let ‘em play!

      Reply

      RWD

      5 months ago

      Good article. Certainly got a lot of attention. Seems like some are blaming the writer when he didn’t start this.
      Ryan Moore did, and he is sour grapes when he should be proud of having been capable of competing on the PGA Tour.
      $34 million? Yikes, he had costs and taxes? Me too, but my income was about 10% of his over 35 yrs. Not about 10 yrs?
      I provided very well for my family, and contributed to a pension plan.
      All the other arguments about the NBA comparisons are irrelevant. They are just for comparison and nothing else.
      Moore has a very successful business? Probably because he played on the Tour.
      Get on with your life, Ryan. I had forgotten all about you and not the least bit interested on seeing you in the next Tour event, unless you can qualify.

      Reply

      Jim Stephens

      5 months ago

      I agree with the competition model. It is a necessary but not sufficient change. The PGA should work on changes to promote sponsor exemptions as a bigger avenue to propel popular players into tournaments. John Daly served to promote tournament attendance years after being competitive.

      Reply

      WYBob

      5 months ago

      Everyone hits a point when their best competitive days are behind them. It’s a harsh reality and a hard pill to swallow for someone who was once in the mix of things. But it happens to everyone, and they have to move on and find a new challenge. Don’t be bitter. My advice to Ryan would be to focus his energies on the company he founded, and make sure it’s staying at the forefront of the footwear and apparel market. True is in a very competitive industry, and taking your eye off the ball or loosing focus can lead to its demise. On the other hand, growing it into a top tier competitor can lead to incredible satisfaction and financial rewards. Just ask Phil Knight, Adi Dassler, Kevin Plank, and more recently David Payntr/Mike Forsey/Michael Glancy .

      Reply

      Adam

      5 months ago

      The comparison between the tour and NBA bench players is not accurate. It would be more like if the NBA arbitrarily reduced the number of players a team can carry on its roster and those end of the bench guys got cut.

      You can’t deny that the tour has over the past few years made it more difficult for marginal to mid-level players to qualify and keep their cards. If the arguments are that there is more competition, then why reduce the field sizes and add more no-cut events? Seeing a good player with a bad week finish +15 on Sunday and still get a nice pay day is not “competitive”. At least the guys on the bubble have motivation to try to make something happen instead of mailing it in on Saturday and Sunday for an easy paycheck.

      Reply

      dennis10844

      5 months ago

      Ryan Who?

      Reply

      Craig

      5 months ago

      As long as this same standard applies to guys like Spieth and Fowler who have not been competitive for years and are only keeping their card due to invites at elevated events with no cuts and higher prizemoney. Until they do that it is not a metiocracy, it’s just fan favourite exhibition.

      Reply

      Alan

      5 months ago

      You are so right, it’s almost like they belong to a ” old boy’s club ” Horshal’s another one..

      Reply

      Scott S

      5 months ago

      Great, pertinent article and analysis. Personally, I like watching the Champions Tour occasionally, but I am a mid-50s player who grew up watching a lot of those names and I can relate to continuing to perform in my middle age.
      For those here who are unable to observe the relevant comparison, your dismissing the forest for the trees; it is a completely relevant comparison of performance and value; the comparison could be to an investment banker, front-line military operator, car salesman or ANY other salaried or hourly-wage position, including salaried NBA, NFL, NHL, or MBL player. Each “team” player receives a salary contingent upon their individual tangible performance and percieved name, image, likeness (NIL) value draw that contributes to that team’s bottom line. Similary, PGA players contribute individually to the PGA “team” bottom line through their tangible performance and perceived NIL value to the bottom line which draws viewers, which draws sponsors. A bunch of +10 handicap players who cannot reach a 200 yard par 3 with a driver, let alone a 7-iron, are not going to draw viewers, or the sponsors who fund prize purses and venues, whether you like it or not. So, the employer, the one who enables you to collect from that purse, (PGA, NBA, Joe’s Ford Sales) has no obligation to provide you an entitlement you haven’t continued to earn. I do realize that “merit” is a foreign, or archaic concept to some but it is a relevant concept. Very few of us “merit” a spot in a professional tournament, BUT, if one of us was to place in an “Open” we would be granted (would merit) that opportunity, and continued performance would “merit” continued opportunity; as long as we perform. If you don’t perform in the NBA, NFL etc. you either get traded or you get let go because you are a net negative on the balance sheet; has anyone considered that maybe the problem is that the NBA, NFL etc. should be following the PGA model, not that the PGA doesn’t follow those organizations with contracted salaries for members to be paid whether they perform or not? As individuals we are granted the Right to pursue happiness. Pursuit doesn’t always guarantee success and it does not bestow the Right to compel others to provide for our happiness. Like it or not, Mr. Moore sounds upset that he is not being rewarded for, to be kind, his tapering success, and therefore diminishing value to the “team,” (NO, that is NOT an diminishment of his value as a person).

      Reply

      Robin

      5 months ago

      I enjoy watching the guys trying to keep their cards more than anything.
      I will miss the P.R. Open. and all the secondary events, played during the majors.
      Those years are over.

      Reply

      Steve Strohschnitter

      5 months ago

      He’s still allowed to try Monday qualifier, right ?

      Reply

      Jim Brown

      5 months ago

      Whoever came up with the idea of comparing a PGA player to a NBA player, needs their head examined. PGA players earn as they go, they don’t have a contract with guaranteed salary. I can totally understand Moore’s statements and I totally agree with him. I’m not a pro. I’m just a hacker at my local, but I do enjoy watching the pros on TV and the format that is called Tour, has me less interested in pro golf.

      Reply

      Michael Terrebonne

      5 months ago

      I take it he has never worked in a real job for a living. If I was always the middle of the pack in my business I would have no business.
      I would have to go do something different. The tour is trying to position itself to be a viable business. You want to stay on tour play better! My baseball coach told me that years ago when I complained about not being in the line up when I was not pitching. He said “You want to play another position when you’re not pitching? Then play that position better than the guy that’s on the field!”

      Reply

      David Conlon

      5 months ago

      I agree. It’s long overdue to cut ties with the dregs of the Tour. Make way for more of guys like Blades Brown, Akshay Bhatia, and Sahith Theegala. Colt Knost is a great example of a guy who figured out he couldn’t compete and he needed to move on. Colt is now a golf broadcaster and a very good one. No offense to Ryan Moore, but he needs to get a clue and move on.

      Reply

      Alex

      5 months ago

      FWIW, Moore’s family runs some really good public courses in WA state and started a clothing and golf shoe called True linkswear.

      Reply

      Thumbdar513

      5 months ago

      So, the plan is to choke off the feeder for the Sr tour? The middle class player, who works from 40 to 50, feeds the Sr tour. Now you kill the line, and the Champions tour with it.

      Reply

      David Conlon

      5 months ago

      I don’t think the PGA Tour Champions is a big draw. Maybe it’s time for it to go away. The private equity money that was invested in the PGA Tour is looking for a rate of return that exceeds the stock indexes, and I guarantee you it’s not happening on the PGA Tour Champions Tour.

      Reply

      Strangelove

      5 months ago

      The Champion’s tour needs to go as well. Why does it exist?

      Reply

      Jonathan S.

      5 months ago

      The Champions Tour is the only pro golf we get to see year in and year out in Washington state and it’s fantastic. Huge crowds every day and guys older than me still out there shooting in the 60s. I get that it’s not the same level as the tour but why would you want it to go away when the market for it is still there??

      John M.

      5 months ago

      A good and fair assessment of the realities of life in 2026. Your comparison to the value of an NBA bench player also is accurate. The PGA tour needs to evolve to become more watchable, and that means mirroring the competetive realities of other sports. Ryan, thanks a bunch, enjoy your $15+ million after taxes and fees, and good luck when you’re finally old enough to join the champions tour.

      Reply

      Tony

      5 months ago

      His comparison is total junk. You can NEVER compare a solo sport to a team sport, NEVER; they are completely different animals.
      So The Plan is to cut down to 100 cards then to cut the season in half to a mere 20-22 events, that surely seems like the best way to grow the sport.

      Reply

      Pete

      5 months ago

      NBA “season” is 6 months … PGA season is 10. That excludes DP … NBA plays 9 games internationally. PGA + DP account for 30+.

      DM

      5 months ago

      False equivalent comparing the NBA to PGA Tour golf, that shortcut to thinking needs no further comment.

      Catering to 150th best, how about the top 125?

      There stories behind all the players….old and young. They are what drives interest, the stories.
      A

      Reply

      Muck

      5 months ago

      “I feel sorry for golfers” said no one, ever.

      Reply

      Jeff

      5 months ago

      How can a reasonable comparison be made between a salaried NBA player and a PGA Tour Pro?

      There is a story here, however I believe this one missed the mark in many ways.

      Reply

      David Dunfee

      5 months ago

      Completely agree. I spent 31 years in the USMC and i got a letter from the retirements branch “telling” me my retirement date was such and such. There were guys I knew that fought to hang around and they were great guys but its a young mans game. Ryan, who I always liked as a player made $34 mil in 20 years and he’s complaining? Young guys are better and are better draws. As was said NO professional sports league lets guys just hang around who arent competitive.

      Reply

      Ben

      5 months ago

      The story missed an opportunity. Both JJ Spaun and Ben Griffin were middle class golfers. Both played awesome and are now toward the top. Before them Max Homa had the same run. Being good is one thing, being consistently good is another.
      If the complaint is the no cut events make it less competitive, then I agree with that. Otherwise, there are avenues to earn a check.

      Reply

      Dale

      5 months ago

      Thanks to my employer Golf Galaxy for removing the ads.

      Reply

      Scott

      5 months ago

      I’d like to see an honest transparent look at how much someone like Moore has to shell out just to be on tour. I was pleasantly surprised that he’s earned as much as he has in 20 years on tour, but that’s gross earnings before big taxes, fees to agents & caddies, etc. How much of his travel between tournaments does he have to do? How much of it is subsidized? Its easy for Netjets or similar to fly Spieth & Thomas around but what about the working class guys?

      Also, he’s in a no man’s land for age on tour. There’s a big drop off in available earnings between the tour and the next level until he hits 50 and can transition to the Champions tour. So if that’s part of his angst, I get it.

      Reply

      Fred Huene

      5 months ago

      Ok, Tiger Woods can no longer contend on the PGA tour. He ranks over 2000. Why can he get into any event he wants? It’s his name, right? He is now lower in ranking than Ryan Moore. Is that right or fair? Just because his name, he is not playing well if at all. He WDs because he does not want to shoot 80, he has excuses, but the fact is he is not one of the elite players anymore. Let’s go back to everyone qualifying again. You know when the PGA tour broke away from the PGA of America it was because the tour wanted to keep more money for the players and what players shot not their popularity.

      Reply

      Johnny Utah

      5 months ago

      With respect, you are comparing the GOAT to Ryan Moore. Surely you understand this is the exception, not the rule. Still today, no one can move the needle like Tiger. He is the guy responsible for all of the purses being huge. Every pro, sponsor, analyst, tour board…everyone involved with golf knows this. When youre the godfather of modern day golf, you have more than earned your right to be in any tournament you want.

      Pete

      5 months ago

      really Morre vs Tiger for viewer eyes and sponsor $$$’s?

      Miles Dean

      5 months ago

      Enjoyed the read. Thanks for a different point of view. What amazes me is the responses to your article. Thought I’d get away from “your point of view is crap since it disagrees with mine” crowd. Guess they are everywhere.

      Reply

      Andrew the Great!

      5 months ago

      “In short, the Tour is looking to put a greater emphasis on competition”…by awarding FEWER Tour cards?!

      Yeah, let’s put greater emphasis on competition among air carriers by…consolidating, and having fewer airlines.

      I swear, the PGA Tour has SFB.

      Reply

      Dancin

      5 months ago

      Completely agree. They should be dropping these leeches every week and bringing up the best players from the previous korn ferry event. Should be top 50 from previous year get a card. Only exception is for injuries and then you get a 1 year extension. Everyone else is on korn ferry tour and they pull up the top players from the previous week’s event to fill the main tour event. If you make the cut and don’t have a card, you get to play another week on the big tour. If you miss the cut without a card you go back down. At the end of the year top 50 in earnings from both tours keep their card + tour card holders with a single 1 year injury extension.

      Reply

      Brian

      5 months ago

      Does this writer have a vendetta against Ryan Moore? Seems like it. I see both sides of this, honestly. Tour preached about a lot of changes and the changes only benefit the top 2%, everyone else gets fvcked. Signature events with small fields and no cuts are dumb! Can’t find one fan who actually likes them.

      Reply

      Mike

      5 months ago

      Ryan Moore put himself in this story. The author obviously has a strong opinion about this subject which is aimed at multiple Ryan Moores. Doesn’t sound personal to me.

      Reply

      ATFinthehouse

      5 months ago

      That’s horseshit. This is more an effort to be ever more elitist. And it also clears the path for the Gen Z who have nothing but disdain (absolutely no respect) for the boomers, millennials. Despite the fact that they paved the way that allows Gen Z to play an elitist game. Rich men, playing other rich men, with other people’s money as the prize.

      Kevin C

      5 months ago

      While I agree that Ryan Moore probably shouldn’t complain about lack of opportunity since he has had opportunities and wasn’t able to take advantage of them, I don’t agree that the Tour is making a better product yet. They are making fields smaller, adding invitation only events, eliminating Monday qualifying and generally doing their best to completely cater to the top 50 in the world which is greatly reducing those feel good stories of journeymen and nobodies winning or just doing really well in events……in other words they are sucking even more life out of it.

      This is not really apples to apples, but since you mention the NBA, I stopped watching that years ago since it got boring once they let them take as many steps as they wanted and back up defenders in the paint. I’ll still watch college games, but not the pros. Golf is going the same way for me although I will probably always watch the Majors….which perhaps coincidentally don’t fully follow new Tour rules.

      Reply

      Robert McWade

      5 months ago

      Your comparision with the NBA would be correct except every player on a NBA team gets paid their negotiated salary whether they play, are injured, and don’t pay travel expenses, etc. PGA don’t get paid unless they make the cut, then they have to play well enough to make a living and pay expenses.
      The tour should go back to 150 players getting cards and the number making the weekly cut remain at 70 plus ties…if you can stay within the 150 and make enough cuts for a living the PGA should be thankful they have the support, even from the aging players; who might want to stay active to support the Champions tour when they turn 50!!

      Reply

      Will

      5 months ago

      You’ve missed the point, the PGA essentially cut opportunities by 20%, the NBA is still expanding so that’s a bad comparison. Beyond that I favor more slots, and why does TV show only 3-4 “featured” groups? I want to see them all, new and old.

      Reply

      Jeff Kinney

      5 months ago

      I don’t understand reducing the field sizes. I get TV, pace of play, etc., but the Tour doesn’t enforce pace of play in any meaningful manner, so it has to be all about TV and finishing within the broadcast window. With the popularity of golf at this time, I would keep the field sizes as is, as well as employing the Monday qualifiers (which is going away). If you’re saying the Ryan Moore will never win another event on the PGA Tour, you may be right, but that is why we play the game. If he can only get into four events, he can’t get any rhythm. And this isn’t just about Moore; Joel Dahmen and many others fall into this category. I don’t respect no-cut tournaments personally. Lastly, if Moore can’t get the opportunity to play and has to wait 6 years for the Senior Tour, he should be allowed to join LIV and play there, but he can’t because the Tour will ban him. He’s in a tough spot in the current structure, as are many others.

      Reply

      William Osborne

      5 months ago

      And why, pray tell, do you think LIV would have any interest in a player of Ryan Moore’s caliber at this point in his career?

      Reply

      Charlie MacLellan

      5 months ago

      I understand the reasons for a competitive field to make the golf more interesting for fans. The model will now resemble boxing in the old days where the best boxers get rich while most are just journeyman punching bags trying to make a living. I don’t necessarily feel sorry for them, everyone picks their path and nobody forces a guy to chase the dream of golf greatness which whether you want to admit it or not is basically a game for young men and women who come from privileged or upper class backgrounds anyway.
      Example is Harold Varner III who took a lot of money from LIV golf back when everyone was criticizing those golfers as greedy. Well Varner made it know that this was guaranteed money for him and his family that would make a difference for generations. Can’t fault that.
      Regardless I have a soft spot for Ryan Moore because of his performance and demeanor during his only Rider Cup appearance. Him and Ricky Fowler acquitted themselves as true sportsman and gentlemen while most everyone else on both teams were running around trying to pop a vein in their neck with their grandstanding and histrionic actions.

      Reply

      Eddie

      5 months ago

      What you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points and may God have mercy on your soul.

      Reply

      Fake

      5 months ago

      What’s today? October?

      Reply

      Jerome Koncel

      5 months ago

      GOLF NEEDS BIGGER FIELDS SO THAT YOUNGER PLAYERS AND OLDER ONES, LIKE RYAN Moore can have that great week when they are in the zone and shooting low scores. I do not want to see Jordan Spieth not make the cut, along with with Brooks Koepka and Tony Finau. Golf needs to be expansive, not exclusive, and this is exactly what the PGA Tour is doing this year. I would rather watch a Michael Brennan win than a Brooks Koepka shoot 4 over par. Let me see and know more about a Keith Mitchell, Joel Dahmen, Chris Gotterup, and not about sad faced Patrick Cantlay, dour looking Xander Schauffle, and the money-hungry Top 50 players. Give me 20 WM Phoenix Opens and I’d be very happy.

      Reply

      M Crouse

      5 months ago

      I couldn’t agree more. I said the same thing when I read Moore’s comments last week. I have nothing against the guy, but the complaints that he made about losing money on the KF tour were ridiculous. A) If you can’t compete there, why would the PGA want you to play more, and B) You made over 34 Million. Suck it up, practice and MAYBE make an impact on the Seniors tout in a few years.

      Reply

      Tony

      5 months ago

      You might want to factor in just how much of that $34M actually went in his pocket; expenses are insane.

      Reply

      PDP

      5 months ago

      I’ve always said… make that a story. Have a “middle of the road” Tour player hand over his books and show really- how much of that $34m made it into his pockets. Thats a great story

      Paul Rankin

      5 months ago

      This is one of those odd opinion pieces written by someone who forgot to do his homework and, apparently, is very proud of it. FYI, Mr. Fairholm, the NBA has 450 players on 30 teams. That four times LESS competitive than what the PGA is aiming at. How, exactly, do you know the 125th or 150th player on tour can’t win anymore?? Oh, right, you are a banging 10 handicap.
      PWR

      Reply

      Thomas A

      5 months ago

      I’m all for having the lower tier players in tournaments. When they catch fire it’s so much fun to watch. Plus, Ryan makes outstanding shoes. Hell, I’m wearing a pair right now.

      Reply

      Gary P

      5 months ago

      Disagree across the board. I much prefer 156 man fields, Friday cuts and, most importantly, watching the up and comers react/struggle near the lead on Sunday. There’s already been a bunch of guys on Sunday leaderboards who can’t even get in the “Rory” events.

      Reply

      Tim

      5 months ago

      Agree. I’m watching less golf as things change. I used to religiously watch every tournament.

      Reply

      Dean

      5 months ago

      I agree with your assessment. Someone always gets but hurt by changes. Sorry Mr Moore, I never even heard you and you probably never heard of me. (I broke 80 twice.) The lobbying for the senior tour age to be 45 is pathetic.

      Reply

      Tony

      5 months ago

      I totally agree and add back in Monday qualifiers to the mix

      Reply

      Actual Golf Fan

      5 months ago

      Can’t have all chiefs and no Indians. Gets boring fast. Golf *needs* the threat of a cut, it needs the possibility of failure and the possibility of longshot success. Take it to an extreme, a season of just the top 20 guys playing 15 events. Nobody would watch after the third one. “Golf Tournament” means 156 guys (maybe as low as 120 at time of the year necessary). As Jason S., eloquently said a couple of years ago “I’ve never been to a golf tournament and thought, Hey, there are too many golfers here!”

      Reply

      Fake

      5 months ago

      I am sure, being in his position, it’s hard to see the end coming. Not good enough to keep it going, not popular enough to get in on sponsor exemptions, and suddenly having the end of your career thrust upon you and not having the option of the Champions tour for a number of years has to leave a guy wondering “what’s next?”

      At the same time, I would have kept my comments to myself and tried to figure out “what’s next?” using the very exclusive network that he undoubtedly can access.

      Reply

      mg

      5 months ago

      golf writers berating a seasoned pro for taking care of his family – wonderful…..

      Reply

      Johnny Utah

      5 months ago

      I dont read it that way at all. At no point did he say he cant take care of his family. Hes by no means anywhere near a top player anymore…why would he get playing time? Think of your favorite sports team…you want them playing scrubs over better players? Are you going to lobby for that and be ok when they take L’s? As Sean said…he made over 34M in 20 years…if you cant take care of your family on that, then you suck at managing money.

      Reply

      Ed Miramontes

      5 months ago

      What’s happening in golf is happening in corporate America. It’s completely based on merit. If you don’t produce or the financials can’t support your role it’s bye bye. The environment changed quickly and there is fallout for some bit not all. Sometimes it’s just not pretty.

      Tony

      5 months ago

      Let’s not do that. You can never compare team sports with contracts that pay you to solo sports where you earn your pay, it just doesn’t work. You mentioned his $34M in winnings but never mentioned his expenses and just how much he put in his pocket, might want to check.
      Lastly, you do realize the PGA is getting smaller and even more elitist with these changes. Soon they will be cutting down to 20-22 events plus Majors, please explain to me how this ‘grows the game’. Keep it open so there are stories to be had, underdogs to be rooted for and that guys dream of making a living on the tour isn’t squashed in the name of superstars.

      Johnny Utah

      5 months ago

      Tony,

      With respect sir, I’m not comparing contracted players to independent contractors. My comparison is solely about playing time. Ryan Moore isnt talented enough to get in the game. The guy at the end of the bench isnt talented enough to get into the game.

      With regards to his earnings, are we really going to feel sorry for someone who earned 34M over 20 years? We all have expenses. Im quite sure he has lived a relatively comfortable life…and he has earned it. I, however, am not about to feel badly that he has to pay for travel/hotels/food/caddy, etc. I’m going to guess (but could be wrong) that you haven’t earned that amount over the previous 2 decades. I know I haven’t. Most of us would be so lucky to have to deal with expenses related to those earnings.

      I also have not advocated for growing the game. I am fine with where the game is currently. The 20-22 events is just a proposal currently… lets see where it ends up when the inks dry. Even then…look at the ball rollback. Seemed like it was set in stone…but rumblings appear as though it may change/get pushed back.

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    News
    Jun 29, 2026
    One Driver Brand Is Three-For-Three In Majors. But It’s Not Dominating The Season
    Chambers Bay Chambers Bay
    News
    Jun 29, 2026
    Where Should The New Tour Championship Be Played?
    Golf Pride Stars and Stripes Zero Taper putter grip Golf Pride Stars and Stripes Zero Taper putter grip
    Golf Grips
    Jun 29, 2026
    These New Limited-Edition 4th of July Putter Grips Are A Little Bit Rock ‘N’ Roll, A Little Bit Country