Which Putter Type Is Best in 2025? Mallet, Blade And Zero-Torque Compared
News

Which Putter Type Is Best in 2025? Mallet, Blade And Zero-Torque Compared

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Which Putter Type Is Best in 2025? Mallet, Blade And Zero-Torque Compared

Thanks to modern testing, picking a putter is no longer about feel. With PuttView Handicap, we’re able to compare putter performance on equal footing across head shapes, stroke types and skill levels.

This metric evaluates how many strokes a putter would gain or lose relative to an average golfer based on real start-line, launch, speed and leave-distance data. In 2025, that lets us finally answer a question golfers have debated seemingly forever:

Which is the best performing putter? Mallet, blade or zero-torque?

To find out, we compared the top performers from each of our 2025 Most Wanted putter categories.

Zero-torque and mallet putters finished in a statistical tie

The L.A.B. OZ.1i (zero-torque) and Wilson Infinite Buckingham (mallet) posted identical PuttView Handicap scores at -7.6, the strongest scoring performance across all category winners.

The OZ.1i holds a slight advantage in average leave distance at 0.59 feet, the best of the group.
The Buckingham follows closely at 0.69 feet.

Blades performed well but with a lower forgiveness ceiling

The Tommy Armour Impact No. 2 was the top blade with a -6.1 PuttView Handicap and 0.73 ft average leave. This is still a strong performance but blades overall showed more variability on mishits and greater face-rotation sensitivity.

How to choose the right putter type based on 2025 performance data

Getting fitted for a putter will tell you exactly what you need. However, our 2025 testing shows clear performance patterns across zero-torque, mallet and blade putters.

If you need more face stability → Look at zero-torque putters

Zero-torque designs reduce unwanted face twist which helps testers produce straighter start lines and fewer open-face misses.

Choose this category if:

  • You struggle with keeping the face square.
  • Your speed control is inconsistent because the face wobbles at impact.
  • You want the putter itself to help stabilize your stroke.

If you want consistent, forgiving performance → Consider a mallet

Across the full mallet test pool, these putters delivered high MOI, better stability on mishits and reliable start-line performance for a wide range of golfers.

Choose this category if:

  • You like a familiar, confidence-inspiring shape.
  • You rely on alignment features.
  • You tend to miss the center and want more forgiveness.

If you rely on feel or have an arc stroke → A blade may still fit best

Blades showed more sensitivity to strike and more toe rotation through the stroke which suits players who already control the face well.

Choose this category if:

  • You have a natural arc-style stroke.
  • You prefer more rotation and more feedback.
  • You want a compact profile and traditional feel.

Final thoughts: Which putter type is best in 2025?

While the zero-torque and the mallet tied with the best PuttView scores in 2025, the real takeaway is simple: the best putter for you is the one that matches your stroke.

For deeper insights, check out the full results from our 2025 putter tests.

For You

For You

News
Jun 19, 2026
USGA Spot On With Shinnecock Setup During Blustery Opening Day
News
Jun 19, 2026
PAYNTR’s Rise Is No Accident: Five MyGolfSpy Members Tested The Reserve Classic Tour RS
News
Jun 19, 2026
Scratch By 50: I Switched From The Worst-Rated Driver To The Best-Rated Driver
Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz

Britt Olizarowicz is a scratch golfer, former teaching professional and one of MyGolfSpy’s leading voices on equipment testing and golf performance. She has spent more than 15 years working at private clubs in New York and Florida and now specializes in translating test data and swing mechanics into practical advice for everyday golfers. Britt began playing at age 7 and has never left the game. When she’s not writing, you’ll find her on the course, playing pickleball, cooking, running or out on the boat with her family.

Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      mg

      6 months ago

      I am going to wait to buy a new putter. I have to pay the loan off of my house first.

      Reply

      Rich welch

      6 months ago

      Have Scotty Cameron putters lost their swag?

      Reply

      Dr. James Weston

      6 months ago

      I can still putt with a 40’s era Bullseye. Don’t need a zero gravity putter the size of a trash can lid. Look at the hole, read the break and stricke
      the ball. Don’t be a head case.

      Clark J

      6 months ago

      How about center-shafted vs. heel-shafted?

      Reply

      Shaker

      6 months ago

      Hideki was the only one using a blade putter at the Hero tournament. Hmmm?

      Reply

      Vito

      6 months ago

      Nice to see 2 of the lowest cost putters ranking at the top. Can’t see paying $699 for a putter(or any other club for that matter)

      Reply

      Merkel

      6 months ago

      I have a hard time believing Wilson and Tommy Armour are the best mallet and blade putters available.

      Reply

      CD Osborne

      6 months ago

      Seems to me that most of BO’s articles are just repackaged information from previous articles. (I agree with Rich). Might even be using AI to generate these, since there is no new information. Comparing two clubs after the article compared the same clubs in an equipment review is not useful or interesting. Mygolfspy needs some fresh new articles.

      Reply

      JL

      6 months ago

      I would love to see one putter test with all categories of putters in it. More than in any other category of club, putters of any kind can be used by any skill level. Besides, the lines are blurred anyway. The Cameron Squareback is a face balanced “blade” but the Fastback 1.5 is a mallet with a lot of toe flow. And the Scotty Zero Torque are marketed as low torque. Just test them all together and see where the chips fall.

      Reply

      Hopp Man

      6 months ago

      I am curious how the cruiser/counter balanced versions of some of these putters work compared to the standard length versions?

      Reply

      Alan Cox

      6 months ago

      “Yup, we settle the putter debate.”- Uhh no ya didn’t?

      Reply

      Rich

      6 months ago

      So is this just repackaged info from the old Most Wanted tests? I’d love to see this set up as an actual test with the same testing pool trying the top blade, mallet, and ZT putters in succession. I think that would actually be pretty useful info!

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    News
    Jun 19, 2026
    USGA Spot On With Shinnecock Setup During Blustery Opening Day
    News
    Jun 19, 2026
    PAYNTR’s Rise Is No Accident: Five MyGolfSpy Members Tested The Reserve Classic Tour RS
    News
    Jun 19, 2026
    Scratch By 50: I Switched From The Worst-Rated Driver To The Best-Rated Driver