Wilson Staff Model Golf Balls & The Baller Box
Golf Balls

Wilson Staff Model Golf Balls & The Baller Box

Wilson Staff Model Golf Balls & The Baller Box

There are two stories to be told with Wilson’s new Staff Model golf ball. First, of course, is the ball.

The second story, however, may wind up to be a tad more compelling. It could be a game-changer, it could be a gimmick, but once it gets off the ground, it will most definitely be different.

We’ll discuss the party of the second part in detail a little farther down the page, but let’s start with the party of the first part: the new Wilson Staff Model four-piece urethane ball.

Firmer, Faster

Wilson introduced the Staff Model concept last year as its product line designed exclusively for the game’s best players. The Staff Model blades have been a hit, and Wilson added utility irons to the lineup last fall as well as wedges last December.

“Staff Model products are for the absolute best players,” says Frank Simonutti, Wilson’s Global Director of Golf Ball Innovation. “This is the best urethane ball we’ve ever put together.”

The Staff Model ostensibly replaces the FG Tour as Wilson’s top-of-the-line, tour-level ball. The FG Tour was hard to find, however, as it was sold almost exclusively through Wilson’s Advisory Staff club pros. The new ball is similar to the FG Tour in that it’s still a four-piece ball (single-core, two mantle layers, and a urethane cover), but Wilson has adjusted the recipe to improve performance.

“We’ve increased the core velocity, so we’ve picked up speed there,” says Simonutti. “In our competitive testing, we found this to be the fastest ball in the urethane category.”

To increase velocity, Wilson has made the core – and by extent, the ball itself – firmer, putting it between 95 and 100 on the compression scale, depending on how you measure. “The ball is about eight compression points higher than the FG Tour, and it’s a good bit faster,” says Simonutti.

Firmer is faster. Where have we heard that before?

Engines and Wings

While short on specifics, Wilson does say the new Staff Model ball performs equal-to or better-than any other premium ball out there…in its own testing. That testing included members of Wilson’s Advisory Staff, several U.S. and European Wilson Tour staffers, other Tour players currently without ball contracts, and robots.

“It spins on 9-irons and wedges better than almost anything else out there,” says Simonutti. “There is one ball even with it, but it’s higher than anything else out there.”

If you think of the core as the engine of the ball, then dimples are its wings. The Staff model has a 362-dimple pattern and a urethane cover that’s 30 percent thinner than anything Wilson has done to this point.

“Everything from the core through the mantle is for velocity. Urethane is actually a negative on velocity,” says Simonutti. “It’s what gives you spin properties, especially on lower swing speed shots.”

The thinner cover means a larger percentage of it is affected by clubhead impact, hence that increased spin with higher lofted clubs.

That higher spin translates to tee shots, as well. This is a Tour-level ball, so expect it to spin like a Tour-level ball.

“Off the tee, it’s probably at the higher end of spin,” says Simonutti. “It’s meant for the best players – guys who need to work the ball off the tee and who needs the best control on approach shots.”

The Staff Model’s 362-dimple pattern is similar to that of the DUO Professional. However, Wilson did make the dimple depth shallower to help bring launch angle up. The DUO Professional doesn’t spin nearly as much and requires deeper dimples to bring launch angle down.

Wilson Staff Model Baller Box

Give Wilson credit for some outside the box thinking in introducing the new Staff Model balls. Unfortunately, the thinking may have been a little too outside the box. The new Baller Box Program, a subscription-based service designed to launch the Staff Model ball with a bang, got off to a false start this week.

The Baller Box Program has three key elements: a Direct-To-Consumer subscription plan, free customization, and unique packaging. Wilson envisions Baller Box as a kind of VIP club for subscribers, but logistical problems and math issues have put the subscription portion on hold for the time being.

The plan features a 3, 6, or 12-month subscription with quantity discounts and better pricing for the more extended plans. Wilson, however, failed to factor quantity discounts into its monthly pricing plan. A golfer buying one dozen per month for 12 months would have wound up paying less per dozen than someone buying four dozen per month for three months or two dozen per month for six months.

Wilson caught the snafu early enough, so while embarrassing there’s no real harm done. For now, Wilson is offering a one-month trial program with quantity discounts.

Beyond the subscription plan, Baller Box includes free customization with a fun little twist. For starters, you can get either three lines of text or a unique player number – up to four digits and in your choice of black, blue, red, or green –  at no extra charge. So if you want your ball to commemorate the War of 1812, for instance, or get one dozen with 867 and a second dozen with 5309, you can. Wilson will add options for a custom logo or photograph printed on the ball, still at no extra charge.

The actual Baller Box itself is also a little different. Golf ball packaging hasn’t changed much since Lee Trevino was a lad: three balls per sleeve, four sleeves per box. The Baller Box breaks that mold. It’s a slick, white oblong package with no sleeves, just the balls cradled in a plastic matrix – sort of like a fancy egg-carton.

A more traditional box designed for retail will be released later this year.

To make the program more of a club, Baller Box subscribers will also get early looks at other new products, info on Wilson Tour staff testing, and other insider information and seasonal Members-Only discounts.

Wilson Staff Model Price, Availability & Final Thoughts

Wilson believes the new Staff Model balls are ultra-premium, and initial pricing reflects that. For the one-month trial program, a single dozen is priced at $49.99, two dozen at $47.49, and three dozen at $44.99.

Again, shipping and customization are included. Subscription rates will be released once the math gets sorted.

Creating an exclusive VIP club with unique benefits isn’t a bad idea, but Wilson is facing a tricky balancing act. Any OEM selling product on its website faces the same problem: you have to protect your retail partners. Quantity discounts and subscription rates have to be attractive enough to entice you, but not so enticing that retailers complain.

And another thing: at $44.99 to $49.99 per dozen, that ball damn well better perform.

Will the Baller Box subscription concept – once it gets off the ground – work? That depends on how you define work. If you define it as the Baller Box turning Wilson into an instant golf ball powerhouse, well then no. Considering where Wilson stands in golf ball market share, that’s not a realistic goal.

Wilson obviously believes the Staff Model is as good, if not better, than anything else out there (don’t worry, we’ll test it). Unfortunately, Wilson is vying for market share leftovers after Titleist, Callaway, TaylorMade, Bridgestone and Srixon, and probably Snell and Vice. So one way to look at it is what does Wilson have to lose here? Business as usual moves the needle only so much, so trying something different to move it a little more is a risk worth taking.

And Baller Box is, in the big picture, a pretty low-risk initiative. If it flops, no real market share harm done. If it moves Wilson even just a little bit in the Tour-level ball space, then great. That might just help Wilson sell a few more golf balls than it would have otherwise.

When you’re in that market position, why the hell not?

For You

For You

News
Apr 25, 2024
Myrtle Beach Classic YouTube Qualifier Is An Interesting Concept That Doesn’t Quite Deliver
Golf Technology
Apr 25, 2024
Skillest is Reimagining Golf Instruction
Golf Bag Carts
Apr 25, 2024
Forum Member Review: Clicgear Model 4.0 Golf Push Cart
John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

John is an aging, yet avid golfer, writer, 6-point-something handicapper living back home in New England after a 22-year exile in Minnesota. He loves telling stories, writing about golf and golf travel, and enjoys classic golf equipment. “The only thing a golfer needs is more daylight.” - BenHogan

John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

John Barba

John Barba





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Randy J.

      4 years ago

      Wilson should keep going further in this direction. Are any of you guys a Makers Mark Whiskey Ambassador? It’s the best brand program out there and Wilson should copy it using the Wilson Staff brand..

      Reply

      Jack

      4 years ago

      So, after more than a decade of touting the advantages of low compression and bragging that they were the first to bring those balls to market, they now develop an overpriced 90 compression ball. I wonder what changed? LMAO

      Reply

      Tim

      4 years ago

      So who is making the ball for them? I know 15 years ago Dunlop/Slazenger was putting the covers on their premium balls before Taylormade took over that ball plant… Wilson has that funky dimple style which no one else has.

      Reply

      Micah

      4 years ago

      What exactly am I paying $50 for? We know what we’re getting we shell out $48 for ProV1: same for Bridgestone, but if you want people gaming your “ultra premium tour ball” you might try $39.99. And considering I can buy last years Srixon Z star at $20 a dozen on sale, why would I ever pony up $50 for a ball I haven’t seen the core of yet? Wilson should stick to the current price structure of and try to pick up market share: because I honestly don’t know anyone who can break 90 who games a Wilson ball: when I was losing a sleeve a round I loved the Staff Duo… Stay in your lane Wilson, this feels like another Cortex to me.

      Reply

      Brett

      4 years ago

      I play off a 1 ghin. I play the Wilson FG TOUR BALL. As good as anything out there.
      Cheers!

      Reply

      Marco

      4 years ago

      I play low 70‘s with a Wilson (FG Tour or DUO Pro) as good as every Pro V1

      Reply

      charles

      2 years ago

      funny i play low 80’s always used wilson clubs, balls, bags. as for cortex driver it works as good as any other i’ve tested an better. hits 300yd+. aint no sheep, don’t follow the flocks.

      Reply

      Mike Cahn

      4 years ago

      If I lost that many balls I would go broke at that price.!

      Reply

      Cody Reeder

      4 years ago

      The subscription pricing is is pretty bad in my opinion. If you buy 12 dozen over 6 months. it cost more than 12 over 12 months.

      Reply

      BingHogan

      4 years ago

      I played the the FG Tour ball last iteration or two.
      Fantastic ball! Performance was extraordinary.

      Played the Professional, not bad but spin was definitely lacking.

      My issue with this new ball is I now have 8 dozen of the new Bridgestone’s . In the XS. Tough to beat.

      So, where are these manufactured?
      China made products will suffer well into the future. If there is a future for them…

      Thanks!

      Reply

      John Barba

      4 years ago

      Taiwan – probably at Foremos.

      Reply

      Geno

      4 years ago

      Just an FYI for all you Active Military, Veterans and First Responders out there, you get a 15% discount from Wilson which drops the price for a single dozen to $42.49. Much more attractive than $50. Maybe even enough to give them a whirl. I just might split a doz with a buddy of mine for trial purposes.

      Reply

      Adrian

      4 years ago

      I am a huge Wilson golf ball fan and still have 29 dozen FG Tour X’s stashed away. I don’t even see the price that they are now because that is for the people that have to have them right now. Wilson Staff tour balls are just as good, better in my opinion, than anyone else’s tour ball, but they do allow their golf balls to be deeply discounted over time so there is no reason to voice concern about the price because by this time next year they will be able to be had for anywhere between 20 to 25 per dozen. I caught a black Friday deal and got 10 dozen FG Tour balls for $14.95 apiece and no other manufacturer’s tour ball will ever be seen for that price unless they are blems or overruns. I’m sure this ball is fantastic so just wait for it to be discounted to a price that you prefer and then stock up because the golf balls perform and I’m sure this one is no different.

      Reply

      JW

      4 years ago

      Looks promising, but a hefty price point.

      Reply

      BR

      4 years ago

      I sincerely hope Wilson continues to improve with their golf products. MGS reviews appear to show the company is producing quality clubs. They are getting some visibility with Gary Woodland on tour. Iconic brand that was one of the best when I started the game a long time ago. But this new golf ball at the price point cited…… I want to see some test results and hear someone say “they have something here”. That would tell me they are ball brand to consider. For now I am sticking with Snell and Titleist. But I am kinda hoping this is the real deal. Thanks MGS.

      Reply

      RT

      4 years ago

      I LIKE IT !!!! It’s about time ., pricing is the deal breaker for me ..I play Wilson Staff thru out the bag ..The New ownership must have kicked in gear already !! But things are costly as it is now don’t choke it by high prices. I like the dimples a break from present trends , bigger core , lettering and esp.the badge but I’m not sure on the 100 compression but if it goes long and stops like it’s got double disc brakes I’m willing to try some !!!!! but not at $50 bucks..

      Reply

      TomS

      4 years ago

      I’ve been playing this ball for about a month. I plays neck and neck with BX from bridgy. The staff being ever slightly softer. It is a serious contender and will test well. Golfers complaining about the price point is hilarious. Kudos to Wilson for the ball and the attempt at subscription type services, it may need some tweaking in the quantity and timing. Wilson’s restoration continues.

      Reply

      Timmy

      4 years ago

      I love the classic look of the Wilson ‘shield’ on the older irons in the background. Wish they’d bring that look back. The new W/S shield is just too plain. Don’t like the graphics on the balls either. the ‘STAFF’ font is very generic looking to me.

      Reply

      Brandon

      4 years ago

      Who cares about packaging? It just ends up going in the recycling anyway. Release the replacement for the V6’s already.

      Reply

      Andrew

      4 years ago

      Ok off topic and I might already know the answer, but which model clubs are in the pictures?

      Reply

      John Barba

      4 years ago

      Wilson Staff Progressives, vintage 1993….sweeter than a cuddle.

      Reply

      Andrew

      4 years ago

      I bought my lady a set of those for “blade day” (giving her some room to wiggle on the top end- cb’s) and she hasn’t played her other set since.

      Larry

      4 years ago

      I wish Wilson Co. well. I don’t think they understand the DTC market. I believe the customer is looking for a very good product for a reduced price. If we wanted to spend $48 a dozen we would all just buy Titleist Pro V1’s.

      Reply

      Scoot24

      4 years ago

      Yeah, if we actually thought that ProV1’s were as good as others.. Just because the they pay more pros to use them and do more advertising. I’m glad I only bought a sleeve when I tried them. Not worth the $.

      Reply

      MIKE

      4 years ago

      Considering I haven’t watched live golf for over 2 months, I almost don’t remember what ‘advertising’ is! But we should all learn from Titleist’s Pro V1’s ‘advertising’. We found about 8,000 balls last year during a massive clean-up of hazards & OB areas. 1 of every 8 was a Pro V1 / Pro V1X. Any company on earth would love to have that market share. And it’s not just the advertising. They may have not worked for you, but they’re quality balls made in the USA.

      JJ

      4 years ago

      Titleist balls ARE quality balls made in the US and that’s a big reason I buy them. That said, upper end callaway and bridgestone are also made in the US.
      Most people know the price to make golf balls (even in the US) is pretty cheap so when we pay $48 for ProVs (or I play the AVX) I know it’s going into supporting what I like to watch when I’m not playing… professional golf.
      I want Wilson to succeed but unless they are going to carpet bomb America with advertising and an unending amount of 2 ball promo sleeves to give out, a $50/dozen golf ball is climbing a huge uphill batter to unseat what’s at the top of the heap now.

      Martin

      4 years ago

      Like others have said the price is to high. Titleist is the Gold standard follow by Callaway everything else needs to be below that. This golf balls need to be under $40.00 and if they perform well. There golf balls need to be the following prices.
      Staff 50 Elite 14.99
      Duo Soft + 19.99
      Staff Duo Professional 29.99
      Staff Model 39.99
      The first are there current prices and adjustment with the last 2 they might get consumer trying them out.

      Reply

      Desert Hack

      4 years ago

      How do you put Callaway up so high after all the garbage we’ve seen that company produce in their ball department?
      Until this new ball proves it passes the mustard, I’d rather play the Wilson ball.
      Personally, I have Bridgestone right there with Titleist as far as quality and performance.
      Callaway isn’t even close.

      Reply

      JC

      4 years ago

      “Followed by Callaway”? You’re being sarcastic I expect. Callaway balls are trash.

      Reply

      Jeff

      4 years ago

      Well, lots of hate on the rollout price.- Would have to agree with all of it and there are some really great comments – very informed readers of MGS.
      Let me comment on the look – of course all personal preference
      I like the larger dimple pattern.
      I love the W/S logo and the sans serif STAFF – but I do not like the scripted number – totally clashes with the san-serif STAFF
      I also like the all black lettering and the alignment line.
      Hopefully I will find one when looking in the bushes, but I doubt it.

      Reply

      Ryan

      4 years ago

      If these are the same as the proto balls I got to try last year, they are a great ball. I did see some distance increase from the FG Tour and the Srixon Z-Stars I had been playing. I did notice similar if not a little more spin on my touch shots. I can’t imagine that this ball will retail at $50. It will probably price out at $45 in stores. The customization is always more expensive.

      Reply

      Jack M.

      4 years ago

      When I first started reading about Wilsons new ball I was thinking to myself that I would give the ball a shot. I live in the country and have a driving range in my front yard and hit all types of balls. I have a couple of Wilsons that I found at the local golf club and they hang well with the other balls but Pro V’s and ProV1’s are consistently the longest the ball to beat at my driving range. At close to 50 bucks a box I will buy them. The baller box and other fancy stuff has zero meaning or value to me.

      Reply

      Jason

      4 years ago

      I think that Wilson has already bailed on the subscription model and moved to just tiered pricing like Snell and Vice. Wilson makes good golf products but I am dubious that their staff ball is $15 per dozen or more better than Snell MTB.

      Reply

      Tim

      4 years ago

      I really think to make people buy this ball tests would have to show it equal to other top balls and maybe 20dollars less price.. Put a box of pro v s on the counter at 50bucks and these at 45 guess what people buy. Pro vs everyday.

      Reply

      Glynn

      4 years ago

      Really like the Duo Pro but it was just too soft. Would be nice to know what this ball competes with and see a review against the Pro – v1 and 1x.

      Reply

      Vern

      4 years ago

      Personally, I applaud Wilson for trying this idea out but who in their right mind would pay $45 plus for an unproven commodity. I agree with most of the rest that the price point should be in the mid $30 range. I’ll just keep playing my Srixons.

      Reply

      Zigmond Post

      4 years ago

      I’ve been playing your Wilson Staff “ZIP” balls for the last 3 months. My Dad had 8 dozen of the ZIP balls tucked away in his closet that I discovered. They must be 20 years old but they are fantastic. Much better than any of your current Wilson golf balls. The ZIP balls go further, stop on on the green and just feel good when you hit them.

      Why did you stop making these fantastic balls?

      Reply

      Ryan

      4 years ago

      Have you been to the world’s biggest retail store yet? Walmart I think?

      Reply

      Robert Schwoegl

      4 years ago

      Not going to pay 45$ a dozen with out even testing it. They should send you a sleeve to try out.

      Reply

      Greg

      4 years ago

      Wilson has been upping their game with new/improved equipment offerings. As others have said, the Staff ball may be every bit as good as a Pro-V but coming in at the same price point is a mistake. No incentive to give it a try if I’m happy with the performance of my Pro-V.

      Reply

      Mark M

      4 years ago

      I don’t know what the guys at Wilson are thinking … beyond the ridiculous price point (NOBODY is going to pay $45-$50 for a totally unknown Wilson golf ball they can’t try out) and bogus subscription plan, could they have picked Worse Timing for this release?!?!
      Holy crap, we’re facing a global pandemic, an enormous number of people are out of work, more than half the country’s golf courses are closed and you’re trying to sell top tier golf balls?? Just … WOW

      Reply

      EMMETT T BERG

      4 years ago

      I dunno how they will perform but Wilson golf is a speck of a subsidiary within a much larger company.. Only to say they have done their marketing, they see now as a time to capitalize on Woodland winning the Open with their clubs, and they see an opening to shoot the moon.

      I’m not really concerned with the price point because like most golfers, if I lose my golf ball the next one out of my bag is a ‘found’ pearl, not a store bought out of the sleeve. The idea of feeling free to plunk down another new ball because they are $28 per dozen is not without vulnerability. Why not buy rock balls? The market is telling us we are compromising in gradations by buying lesser balls than a Pro-V.. It’s a place Wilson has been so why not give it a go. I’ll give it a try because I play Wilson already and the personalization can be different dozen by dozen.

      Reply

      Mattymulls

      4 years ago

      I think Wilson missed the mark with pricing on this one. $39.99 puts them at the srixon price point and no one ever accused srixon of not being top notched quality. At $39.99 I’d give this ball a shot, but $49.99 I have zero interest for me, hopefully they come to their senses and get the pricing right on this, rooting for Wilson to make a comeback but the ball market is full of quality choices at much better price points then where they are aiming, jmo.

      Reply

      Don O

      4 years ago

      Srixon is at the 44.95 range, not counting frequent sales. Wilson really needs to be under $40. Even Pro-V’s can be ordered on a volume basis for 4-4-3 pricing at about $36 a dozen for only 4 dozen. Woo-hoo, I can get a volume discount of 10% from Wilson. $35.99 to $39.99 might make some sales.

      Reply

      patrick sheehan

      4 years ago

      Ummmm……I wouldn’t want anything called ‘baller box’ delivered to my house….just sayin

      Reply

      Steve

      4 years ago

      I’ll have to check with Jenny!
      I saw what you did there.

      Reply

      John Barba

      4 years ago

      Glad someone picked up on it ;-)

      Reply

      Barry Schwartz

      4 years ago

      Even with shipping included, $50/dozen for a trial of a new untested ball is a stretch. Let’s face it, the ProV1 is the standard by which all other balls are measured, so charging more right off the bat because your testing shows it’s better – well they have big brass ones for sure. I venture there are very few people who don’t like the performance of a ProV, just not the price, thus opening the door for Snell and Vice.. Wilson seems to be setting themselves up for failure with this launch stratedy.

      Reply

      Geno

      4 years ago

      “”Wilson seems to be setting themselves up for failure with this launch stratedy.”” Barry Schwartz

      You’re right on there Barry…. Anyone remember the Cortex at $500 (now available straight from Wilson for $199) ??

      Reply

      MIKE

      4 years ago

      I watched every episode of Driver vs Driver…the blond ‘hostess’ was smoking hot. BTW, what product were they trying to sell, I missed that part!

      Nick A

      4 years ago

      I agree with Jerry. A new dozen golf balls will last me months. I often get as many as 4-5 rounds per ball unless I lose it. I too often find a lot of good balls that get in play at least for most regular games. Just like the oil supply today, it will not be long before there would be a glut of new balls. This may have a better chance if the balls were Titleist or Callaway . Almost no chance with Wilson……

      Reply

      Hector

      4 years ago

      John;
      Price matters. For some golfers, it matters a LOT.
      The cost of producing, marketing, and bringing a golf ball to market varies, but not nearly as much as the range of prices charged for balls. One of the big differentiators impacting price is how many staff pros are compensated for playing the ball (ask Titleist about that one). Other than that, and quality assurance, there aren’t a lot of differences in the cost of tour-grade golf balls. My point is that the cost of a high-performance, three or four-piece, urethane cover golf ball subjected to adequate manufacturing quality control is fairly similar regardless of the name on the ball.
      It you want to know what it costs to develop, manufacture and deliver a high-performance ball to consumers, ASK DEAN SNELL. He has been at the heart of the industry for decades. The answer is found in his pricing. He is making a living at $28/dozen. Anything a company charges on top of that is either to support all the other costs (marketing, pro staff players, etc) or it is pure profit.
      If one’s ego demands that a common hacker (or even low-handicap amateur) just absolutely has to play “Tiger’s ball” or “Justin’s ball” or “Brooks’ ball” and they are willing and able to pay the cost, fine. But for most of us it isn’t necessary.
      If Wilson thinks that scavenging for the scraps in the high end of the golf ball market is helpful because it supports their Staff branding, that is fine too. But if they want to sell golf balls to the rest of us, they should have initially priced the new Staff ball at under $40. At that price, there is plenty of profit margin for them. They don’t exactly have a hoard of pro staffers playing their equipment and demanding compensation for doing so. And regular guys like me might actually buy a dozen at that price just to see if they are really competitive with the big boys. But not at $50/dozen.
      It will be interesting to see what you find about the Wilson Staff ball when you do the golf ball test this year. If I find a new Wilson Staff in the places I often hit my drives, I’m sure not going to be cutting them up. But I am going to wonder why a golfer who hit the ball out there with mine was spending $50/dozen for his/her golf balls.

      Reply

      charles sachs

      4 years ago

      I don’t get it. A company comes out with a brand new ball no one has seen or used before. They want me to buy balls at $48 a dozen and just trust them that I will prefer this one over my existing ball. They should come out with a 2 ball sample box and basically give it away to get me to try it. If they are so confident that this ball performs better than let me try 1 or 2 and make me a repeat customer.

      Reply

      Tim

      4 years ago

      MGS: Thanks for the update, but when I can get a premium high performing ball like Snell for around $30 a dozen I will pass. Good luck to Wilson in their efforts to reinvent their once iconic brand.

      Reply

      Joe Gilbert

      4 years ago

      At $45-$50 per dozen, I am not the least bit interested. I would say Wilson Staff needs a new pricing model.

      Reply

      Matthew

      4 years ago

      I was actually excited to try this ball until I got to the section about the price point. Wilson is hardly a relevant player in the golf market anymore and while I am impressed with the products they’ve been putting out in recent years, particularly the irons, they are still thought of as a substandard brand. At $50 per dozen, I have ZERO interest in trying their ball.

      Reply

      Ed Russo

      4 years ago

      How stupid is this program? A golf ball subscription service? Wilson is a second-tier golf company. If Wilson can sell me 12 dozen balls for an average of $44.99 per dozen, then they sure as heck can sell me 1 dozen golf balls for the same $44.99 per dozen. As I said earlier, Wilson is a second-tier golf company and they’ll have to do better than charging me an additional $5 surcharge for the “honor” of allowing me to test their new golf ball. This is exactly why Wilson will always be a second-tier golf company, there is no forethough or goodwill on their part. Just look at their Triton Driver that went to market and it wasn’t even USGA conforming. Yup, definitely a second-tier golf company.

      Reply

      Mike

      4 years ago

      I’ve heard from buds that the Wilson balls perform really well. But $45-50 a dozen? Seriously? I can buy Prov1’s from Dicks at that price, or buy them on eBay for less, or, buy Vice balls for much, much less. I couldn’t care less about personalizing my ball & actually even less about “packaging”. (WTF would packaging have to do w/ my ball’s performance?). Gonna be a tough sell (at that price-point) to get other ball user’s to switch.

      Reply

      Chisag

      4 years ago

      Nice job as always JB. I have not been in any Focus Groups and do not have a degree in Marketing, but common sense says there is a sweets[pot between charging too much and not being seen as competitive with established brands and charging too little and not being thought of as a premium offering.

      So it seems to me you have to give golfers an incentive to try something other than their trusted ProV1, TP5/X, Chrome Soft/X, Z Star/XV and Bridgestone B lineup up. I think an “Introductory offer” of an extra sleeve 15 ball pack or a price of $39.99 might induce golfers to give the Staff a try. At this price point however, I am not even curious.

      Reply

      John

      4 years ago

      Where are they made.? If made in China Titleist has nothing to fear about losing market share.

      Reply

      Jerry

      4 years ago

      I suppose it’s a unique idea, but isn’t one of the goals of trying to be a better golfer NOT losing balls. Perhaps it’s just my frugalness, but I play a ball as long as it’s not lost or drowned. Last year I found as many balls as I’ve ever found, played some, left some. Decided to use Srixon due to your test results and my game. Now, if we ever get outside again, I’ll see if I made the right decision. I hope I don’t lose enough to necessitate a subscription to anything but a magazine.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    News
    Apr 25, 2024
    Myrtle Beach Classic YouTube Qualifier Is An Interesting Concept That Doesn’t Quite Deliver
    Golf Technology
    Apr 25, 2024
    Skillest is Reimagining Golf Instruction
    Golf Bag Carts
    Apr 25, 2024
    Forum Member Review: Clicgear Model 4.0 Golf Push Cart
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.