PING G430 MAX, LST and SFT Drivers Are USGA Conforming
Drivers

PING G430 MAX, LST and SFT Drivers Are USGA Conforming

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

PING G430 MAX, LST and SFT Drivers Are USGA Conforming

PING is kicking off your Monday with a textbook “good news, bad news” situation. The good news is that PING’s upcoming G430 family of drivers—a lineup which again includes MAX, LST and SFT models—has hit the USGA’s conforming list. The bad news is that parts of the world (most notably Australia) will get it months before we do here in the States.

The G430 teaser of sorts might feel familiar. The them now, us later approach is a repeat of how PING launched the G425 and while I don’t love it, I get it: with peak golf season fading as quickly as the daylight here in the U.S.A., other parts of the world are just ramping up.

It’s true that the supply chain is improving but it hasn’t fully recovered from COVID and so I suppose it makes sense to limit release to smaller markets while stockpiling inventory for a January global release.

For sure, that makes for a bit of an awkward release where the official dissemination of engineering and performance details will likely be confined by geographical boundaries but there are some intriguing bits to be gleaned from the USGA listings.

As mentioned, PING will again launch three models.

G430 MAX

A USGA image of the PING G430 MAX Driver

It’s a safe bet that the G430 MAX will again push the limits of MOI. That’s why it’s called the “MAX”. The G425 MAX was effectively at the limit (5,900 g/cm2) so there’s not much room to improve as far as your classic heel/toe forgiveness metric is concerned.

Stability from the top to bottom of the face is one potential area of improvement.

While PING isn’t as over-the-top as many in the industry, speed stories are requisite for the driver category, so distance gains are all but guaranteed.

Improved adjustability may be in the offering as well. It’s difficult (impossible, really) to tell from the photos but it wouldn’t surprise me if PING had increased the amount of adjustable mass and/or expanded the range of the weight track just a bit.

G430 LST

A USGA image of the PING G430 LST Driver featuring carbonfly wrap technology

What’s true for the MAX is true for the LST (and SFT) so we might see improved MOI and a wider range of weight adjustability. The curiosity for me is whether PING has decided to take LST in a more aggressively low-spin direction.

One could argue that with 460cc designs like Stealth+, TSR3 and LTDx LS in the market, PING needs to trim a bit of spin to be a serious competitor in the low-spin segment.

The counterargument is that PING doesn’t have any interest in competing there. It seems content with positioning its low-spin driver at what I’d describe as the lower end of the moderate-spin range.

And, not for nuthin’, LST has been nothing short of exceptional for PING. So much so that a good bit of the competitive set offers drivers that mirror the performance characteristics of the LST.

It’s the one that comes up most often when PING competitors talk about the driver that’s difficult to beat in the hitting bay.

My best guess is to expect a collection of small improvements but not any significant change in design philosophy.

CARBONFLY WRAP

With that said, there is an interesting ripple in the LST story. Listed in the “Markings” section of the USGA’s description of the G430 LST driver is “CARBONFLY WRAP”.

The likelihood is that “Carbonfly” is a play on PING’s Dragonfly crown technology with the implication that the LST will feature a carbon-fiber crown or, at a minimum, carbon-fiber components.

You’d have to go back about 15 years to the Rapture series to find PING’s last use of a carbon-fiber crown in a driver so this is a significant departure from the status quo for PING.

Over the years, we’ve asked PING about its continued use of titanium as its crown material. The company has never deviated from the answer that it will continue to use the best-performing material for a given application.

The bottom line is that PING isn’t going to use carbon fiber just to use carbon fiber.

G430 SFT

A USGA image of the PING G430 SFT driver. It will likely prove to be the best driver for slice correction.

For the target player, PING doesn’t believe there’s such a thing as too much draw bias. The idea behind SFT has always been to pack in as much shot-shape correction as possible without making the driver look janky at address.

And while it’s true that you aren’t likely to mistake the LST for the SFT at address, PING has done an outstanding job of making the SFT look like what slicers with all degrees of affliction like to see when they look down.

The bottom line: Expect more extreme slice correction from the SFT. That said, the most visible enhancement is the addition of movable weight to the G430 SFT.

Unlike the MAX and LST models which offer Draw and Fade positions, the G430 SFT offers Draw and Draw+. How much Draw+ gets you will be revealed in time but I’m confident it’s going to be far and away the most anti-slice biased driver on the market in 2023.

AVAILABILITY

The expectation is that the PING’s G430 drivers will launch in Australia (and surrounding areas) this month. Full details for the rest of us aren’t expected until January with the full global release in early 2023.

As far as price is concerned, I expect $550 will be the basement this year and it’s possible, even likely, that the G430 series will be among a sizeable crop at $600.

More information as it becomes available.

Don’t Want to Wait? Save Now

With the PING G430 driver likely to command a premium price, golfers looking to save money may want to consider a PING G425 driver. The current models (G425 MAX, G425 LST, and G425 SFT) are excellent and are heavily discounted at $399 (originally $549) in anticipation of the G430 release..

For You

For You

Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024 Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024
Buyer's Guides
Apr 12, 2024
Best Spikeless Golf Shoes of 2024
First Look
Apr 12, 2024
Under Armour’s Cheesy Take on the Masters
News
Apr 12, 2024
PING WebFit: Get Fit From your Phone
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Robbut

      2 years ago

      I simply cannot believe that every new launch is better than the last. I expect the golf publications that are funded by major manufacturers advertising to be biased, but we need mygolfspy to call it out when it’s not as good. I get it that equipment manufacturers need to amp it up but that’s why independent views like this are vital., else it’s another £1000 for three woods with no gain!

      Reply

      Doug Hansen

      2 years ago

      An actual teaching pro once told me when I was shopping for a new driver, “you should no in a few shots if this is going to make a significant difference for you.”

      I currently game the Ping G410. It made an immediately discernible difference over my ancient TM RBZ ) white driver (which I did end up tweak-shuffling through five different shafts with… so I bought it. and have played it since with the stock shaft.

      Two models later, will the G430 make an immediately discernible difference. I doubt it. But… hey… golf equipment brands and their offshore factories have to make a living, right? .

      It’s interesting that golf equipment is now in a planned obsolescence/continuous improvement cycle similar to where cars were in the 1950’s – 1960’s.

      Reply

      Willie T

      2 years ago

      Currently game G400 SFT and enjoy it. The turbolators do not bother me. Would like to see how much difference there is in 3 generations.

      Reply

      Jeff

      2 years ago

      Agree. Would love to see a 4-generation head-to-head test between the G400, G410, G425 and now G430 drivers. What exactly are we gaining with each generation?

      Reply

      jonathan

      2 years ago

      You should watch Rick Shiels on Youtube. He compared drivers from Ping, TM, Callaway for a five or six year period. He found no discernable difference among them. In fact, some of the older driver outperformed the newer ones.

      Reply

      Bobby

      2 years ago

      Info. On Ping G30 irons?

      Reply

      Mike

      2 years ago

      Tony, thanks for the update. I’ll definitely try it, why not? I’m gaming a Radspeed & until something some clubhead & shaft combo knocks it off, it’ll stay in my bag. And it’s going to have to be substantially better considering that even after trading in my current driver, it’s going to cost me huge $.

      Reply

      JoeT

      2 years ago

      Heavily discounted at $399. ROTFLMFAO, the golf industry and the silly wildly overpriced stuff it shovels upon the patently gullible and shopper addict types are comical. :Tech and actual performance is little changed over the past 15 years, but the prices soar higher and higher. New fools are indeed born every minute. :-)

      Reply

      Kevin

      2 years ago

      I just hope they get rid of those damn turbulators. I’m still gaming a refitted F9 and not enticed by the new and shiny, especially at around $600. Tried the new TSR so if I was feeling frivolous I would go there.

      Reply

      Paul O'Neil

      2 years ago

      looks like both Titleist & Ping’s Supercomputer/AI and CAD program found the same ‘channel’ along the front of the sole plate

      like Titleist, I hope they go to 5 weight placements at the back – a slight toe placement being the key

      asking for a good-sounding Ping is obviously too much of a wish list – the day they do it, I will finally buy one

      Reply

      Joe T

      2 years ago

      FN TURBULATORS… can’t look at them..

      Reply

      Brian

      2 years ago

      If you look at the ball, like you’re supposed to, at address, you don’t even see them.

      Reply

      JoeT

      2 years ago

      Thanks for the tip Brian, currently a +2.1 index.

      Joseph Trovero

      2 years ago

      Appreciate the tip but as. +2.1 index, how the driver looks at setup is important and btw, I don’t look at the ball in my driver swing, I look just behind it as I’m swinging up on it.

      Jeremy

      2 years ago

      I am not a ping guy. I somewhat liked the look of the 425. This is hideous.

      Reply

      DaveyD

      2 years ago

      The G425 is an excellent driver except, IMHO, sound. It will be interesting to see if the G430 has a different sound.

      Reply

      Gil Bloomer

      2 years ago

      Never really cared much about the sole area of the clubs in terms of its looks. I care about what the crown looks like at address.. Some clubs just don’t look good for various reasons and don’t instill confidence at all.

      Reply

      Golfinnut

      2 years ago

      Did someone say “anti-slice?” Then I’m in! Interested in the SFT for sure.

      Reply

      dhb10844

      2 years ago

      “For the target player, PING doesn’t believe there’s such a thing as too much draw bias. The idea behind SFT has always been to pack in as much shot-shape correction as possible without making the driver look janky at address.” Please define “look(s) janky?~”

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024 Best Spikeless Golf Shoes 2024
    Buyer's Guides
    Apr 12, 2024
    Best Spikeless Golf Shoes of 2024
    First Look
    Apr 12, 2024
    Under Armour’s Cheesy Take on the Masters
    News
    Apr 12, 2024
    PING WebFit: Get Fit From your Phone
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.