PING i525 Irons
News

PING i525 Irons

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

PING i525 Irons
  • PING has introduced the i525.
  • The i525 replaces the i500 as the company’s signature “player’s distance” offering.
  • The irons promise more speed and greater consistency.
  • MSRP starts at $205 per iron. Retail availability starts March 24.

PING i525 Irons

The PING i525 iron is emblematic of the company’s typical no-nonsense approach to design (and marketing, for that matter). With PING, there’s usually not much in the way of fanfare. Occasionally,  they give us something we can see—Turbulators and Hydropearl finish spring to mind—but more often than not, PING hides its best work under the hood and under the radar.

It’s the consequence of a Moneyball-like strategy that doesn’t rely on hitting a home run with each new release. Summed up by PING’s Director of Product Design Ryan Stokke, “We don’t find that one design attribute makes a great club.”

With that in mind, it won’t surprise you to learn that performance gains between the i500 and i525 irons weren’t made with a single leap but rather a series of small steps that touch on nearly every aspect of the design.

More Speed

Given that the PING i525 resides solidly in the “player’s distance” category, it makes sense that improving ball speed would be one of the design goals. That’s typically easy enough to accomplish given that the industry has no qualms about adding gaining distance via the bending machine. So the more nuanced part of the discussion is that PING was able to make the i525 iron longer than its predecessor without jacking lofts or sacrificing performance in other areas.

The extra speed comes by way of changes to the construction of the iron. With the i525, a forged maraging steel face is robotically plasma-welded to a 17-4 stainless steel body. The fundamentals of the construction aren’t uncommon in the player’s distance category or even the game-improvement space for that matter.

It’s a metalwoods-like approach that allows for more face deflection.

There are two key speed-boosting elements to the design. The first is a variable thickness face that progressively thins as you move towards the perimeter. That gives the face a bit more flex.

By thinning the sole undercut and pushing it deeper into the head, PING was able to push more of the impact stress into the body. Not only does this provide greater deflection (more speed) but it does so in a more controlled manner that helps create greater consistency.

Enhanced Feel

The improved feel of the PING i525 iron is the result of a more precise use of PING’s EVA polymer (hot melt) material. As I’ve mentioned before, PING is among the companies that believe the best filler for a hollow-body iron is air so we’re not talking about a P-790 or PXG-like full-body filling. Non-scientifically, we’re talking about a little bit of good stuck to the back of the face. It’s enough to improve sound without impeding the face’s ability to flex.

By using a consistent four grams of hot melt precisely positioned in each head, PING was able to dampen the high-pitched frequencies that golfers typically correlate with unpleasant feel.

In addition to better feel in general, PING says the feel is more consistent across the set. Stokke describes it as a cleaner, pure impact experience.

Improved Shaping

For the player’s distance category, the i500 was too big for my tastes. Like PING’s game-improvement irons, it was a bit too long heel-to-toe for me.

With the i525 iron, the goal is to mimic the look of a better player blade with a design modeled off the i210.

The short version of the story is that the i525 isn’t as bulky as the i500. Toplines have been thinned, offset reduced and the blade length has been shortened.

PING describes the design as more balanced and, while that’s a reasonable assessment, what might be the most informative bit is that the long irons essentially split the difference between the i500 and i210 while the profile of the short irons and scoring clubs is nearly identical to the 210s.

Better Launch Conditions

In the case of the i525, “better launch conditions” is synonymous with “more consistent launch conditions.” The idea of “better” speaks as much to proper fitting as anything else but PING says its suite of consistency-boosting technology can help golfers reduce inconsistencies across a range of conditions.

To that end, PING is again leveraging its Hydropearl 2.0 finish. PING’s proprietary finish helps shed moisture in damp conditions, reducing the launch and spin differences between wet and dry conditions.

New to the i525 is what PING has branded MicroMax grooves. With MicroMax, PING has reduced spacing between grooves. To put some specifics on it, the distance between grooves is .104 inches, down from .140. That enabled PING to add an extra four to five grooves depending on the iron. Paired with a new sidewall geometry, PING was able to smooth out performance a bit further.

The benefit of MicroMax is reduced fliers in the short irons and more consistent spin rates with the longer irons. Ultimately, MicroMax serves to help realize the high ball speed potential of the i525 while maintaining proper trajectory and landing angle.

Finally, PING added Friction Face—a little bit of texture between the grooves—which further narrows launch and spin differences in wet versus dry conditions with the scoring clubs. That gives you more consistent distance on those critical approach shots.

Increased MOI

It wouldn’t be PING without an MOI story. So here goes …

Despite the i525 iron’s smaller footprint, by saving weight in the face and improving the positioning of the heel and toe weights, PING was able to increase the MOI of the i525 relative to the i500.

By the numbers, the i525 offers 2.5 percent higher MOI from top to bottom and 3.5 percent better MOI in the heel-toe direction. Neither is a massive number but, again, steady small improvement is the PING way and it should translate as more consistent ball speed as well as more consistent spin rates.

RANKED: Best Irons In Golf ????

Looking for which irons performed best?

PING i525 Irons – The Total Package

The total benefit of the upgrades to the PING i525 works out to about one mph worth of ball speed and a 17-percent reduction in the dispersion with launch and spin nearly identical to the i500. Under PING’s Strokes Gained calculations, that works out to a benefit of about 1.5 strokes per round.

Power Spec and Retro Spec

While PING hasn’t changed the lofts from i500 to i525, it will again offer Power Spec and Retro Spec options. The idea is that, as with drivers, there’s not a single iron loft specification that’s right for every golfer. PING is trying to hit the middle of the market with the stock package with the understanding that some golfers will benefit from stronger lofts (Power Spec) while others will benefit from weaker ones (Retro Spec).

Power Spec lofts run 1 to 1.5 degrees stronger while Retro Spec lofts are two degrees weaker across the board.

PING i525 Irons – Stock Shafts

Given the supply chain issues plaguing the industry, you couldn’t fault a manufacturer for listing its stock shaft as “whatever we happen to today” but with the i525 iron, PING is leveraging the Project X IO as its stock offering.

Within PING’s matrix, the IO shakes out as middle of the grid for launch and spin.

The stock graphite offerings are the UST Recoil 780 SMAC and PING’s ALTA CB slate.

As always, a catalog of alternatives are available.

Arccos Sensors

PING will not be including Arccos-embedded grips as standard equipment. However, a purchase of the i525 irons entitles you to a full set of sensors and a 45-day trial of the Arccos Caddie app. All you have to do is fill out some online (virtual) paperwork and the sensors will be mailed to you.

PING i525 Pricing and availability

MSRP for the PING i525 irons is $205 each (steel) $220 each (graphite). Pre-sale starts Feb 8 with full retail availability beginning March 24.

For more information, visit PING.com.

For You

For You

Golf Shafts
Apr 14, 2024
Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
News
Apr 14, 2024
A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
Drivers
Apr 13, 2024
Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      CJB

      2 years ago

      I have been playing the i525 irons (4-U) over the past month and I have been impressed. I am coming from the G425 GI irons and wanted more control as I am now able to shape my shots. While I agree the price is high, considering these irons will remain in my bag for a considerable time, I’m happy with the purchase. Consistent distances, tight shot dispersion and great feel.

      Reply

      Rick

      2 years ago

      Just another 790 clone, does that make everyone on the band wagon? Mizuno, Cobra, Taylormade, Ping, Titleist, Honma…I’m sure I’ve forgotten someone! Hit most and not a fan, prices for “technology” are stupefying

      Reply

      Barry

      2 years ago

      Do you mean a PXG clone? 790 came out after PXG and was sued because of the hollow body and polymer inside copy.

      Reply

      Kansas King

      2 years ago

      Hollow body irons have been around for decades. It was until recent history that they made them a bit more shapely and took market share. I’m not saying there haven’t been improvements in manufacturing that allow them to make much better hollow body irons but the whole idea of hollow-body irons isn’t new. Honestly, most ideas in golf aren’t new, even carbon faces on drivers and woods. We’re mostly just seeing manufacturing technology improve enough to take advantage of old concepts. Even then, no matter the design, the basic physics driven by the mass and dimensional characteristics of a club head have not changed.

      bob

      2 years ago

      I have no idea why PING has the slot cut out at the bottom of their hosels but it is so off putting to me that I could never put a PING iron set in my bag. Maybe I need to get diagnosed with some sort of golf OCD but I have a serious aversion to how that looks.

      Reply

      Sherwin

      2 years ago

      The slot is used to adjust the club’s lie and loft in a special jig that PING designed. It is not visible at address.

      Reply

      John

      2 years ago

      Softy

      Reply

      Doug

      2 years ago

      Those irons look sweet!

      Reply

      Mike

      2 years ago

      Tony, great review. But $220 (in graphite) per iron? So a set for me (of seven irons) including tax (in my state) w/b ~$1,650. Insane! All the more proof that golf equipment prices are getting just plain stupid. Would love to know how many sets of these they eventually sell.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      2 years ago

      Actual street price will be lower. Most manufacturers provide MAP which is effectively retail. PING continues to use MSRP which is always a bit over MAP.

      Reply

      Jeff

      2 years ago

      $205 a club. $1,230 for 5-PW. Comparable set of Sub70 699 irons. $90/club.
      $540 for 5-PW. Hard pass on OEMs with these prices.

      Reply

      James

      2 years ago

      Just got some 699s. Really good club at a great price. CEO walked me through the shaft options over the phone. I hope Sub70 continues to find success.

      Reply

      Matt Gallo

      2 years ago

      The price of every clubs seems to be going up. I feel like I can at least justify spending a little more on irons as they stay in my bag a little longer.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Shafts
    Apr 14, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
    News
    Apr 14, 2024
    A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
    Drivers
    Apr 13, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.