2020 Most Wanted Super Game Improvement Iron
Irons

2020 Most Wanted Super Game Improvement Iron

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

2020 Most Wanted Super Game Improvement Iron
Cobra F Max Airspeed
Cleveland Launcher HB Turbo
Cobra T-Rail
PING G710
Tommy Armour 845 Max
Most Wanted Super Game Improvement Iron
Cobra F Max Airspeed
  • 2020 Most Wanted Super Game Improvement Iron
  • The leader in strokes gained for mid and long irons.
  • A tester favorite in the looks department.
  • Not a club for those seeking distance.
  • 1st
  • 5th
  • 135.96 Yards
Runner-Up
Cleveland Launcher HB Turbo
  • Among the leaders in strokes gained for short irons.
  • Second-best for forgiveness.
  • Testers were pleased with the design and look of the club.
  • Towards the bottom for total distance.
  • 2nd
  • 2nd
  • 145.25 Yards
Cobra T-Rail
  • The leader in strokes gained for short irons.
  • A majority of the testers were happy with the dark finish.
  • Testers also liked the contrasting white line at the bottom of the face for alignment.
  • Towards the bottom for forgiveness.
  • Towards the bottom for total distance.
  • 3rd
  • 11th
  • 143.78 Yards
PING G710
  • Among the leaders in strokes gained for long irons.
  • Above average strokes gained for short irons.
  • A tester favorite in terms of looks/design.
  • Towards the bottom for forgiveness.
  • Towards the bottom in strokes gained for mid irons.
  • 4th
  • 10th
  • 144.04 Yards
Best Value
Tommy Armour 845 Max
  • The leader in total distance.
  • Among the leaders in strokes gained for long irons.
  • A subjective favorite among the tester pool.
  • Towards the bottom in strokes gained for short irons.
  • Towards the bottom in forgiveness.
  • 5th
  • 9th
  • 150.29 Yards

INDEPENDENT AND UNBIASED

MyGolfSpy accepts zero advertising dollars from any of the major golf manufacturers. We believe in always putting #ConsumerFirst.

180

Hours
Researched

11,520

Shots
Hit

12

Products
Considered

55.9m

Readers

OUR JOB IS YOUR GAME

2020 has been one hell of a year. Not the least of the pandemic’s impact was that it disrupted our Most Wanted Testing.

Don’t despair! The final installment of 2020 Most Wanted Testing is finally here so that’s a little good news.

The 2020 Most Wanted Super Game Improvement Iron- a category that markets to the mid- to higher-handicap golfer.

Within this category, you receive forgiveness, which is a phenomenal selling point to beginners and golfers in the mid to higher handicap range. In general, even the best super game-improvement irons probably won’t blow you away with aesthetics. However, forgiveness, consistency and playability strongly outweigh winning a beauty contest.

If you are looking to enhance your game, to enjoy your game and can put aside your ego for a better game, this test is for you!

Most Wanted: Cobra F Max Airspeed

Performance Grades

Below is a breakdown of performance grades by iron length. The percentages displayed for each iron represent the frequency at which each was among the best super game-improvement irons for each tester across the test pool. For more information about how we arrive at these results, see our How We Test page.

Buying Considerations

Performance should be your primary concern when buying new irons but there are some additional considerations you may want to think about before you make your purchasing decision.

SET MAKE-UP

Throughout Most Wanted Testing, we encourage attentiveness to set make-up. This test is no different. A majority of super game-improvement iron sets do not include a 4-iron. Most stock sets include 5-PW with the addition of a gap wedge in some instances. In others – like the Cobra T-Rail a 4-hybrid is part of the offering.

Distance gapping and control are critical elements of the best super game-improvement irons. Pay close attention to these factors as they are a ticket to success when determining your set make-up.

SHAFT SELECTION

Super Game Improvement irons tend to feature lighter shaft options compared to other iron categories. While graphite shafts dominate the field, there are steel options. When steel is the option, the best super game-improvement irons typically feature shafts that weigh less than 100 grams.

The whole purpose of super game improvement irons is to enhance playability primarily for mid- to high-handicap golfers who struggle with speed and playable launch angles. Thus, you see the strong presence of lighter-weight, higher-launching shafts. This feature intertwines with another feature, low and back CG (center of gravity) within the clubhead. With the combination of these two components, forgiveness and optimum launch angles are obtainable. Discovering and implementing the appropriate shaft will increase the chance of having more playable irons.

DISTANCE VERSUS FORGIVENESS

In this category, forgiveness should be your primary objective. With each passing year, it is evident that super game improvement irons are the champions of forgiveness. But what about distance? For those who believe distance is a key element of the best super game-improvement irons, the Tommy Armour 845 Max, Callaway Mavrik Max and Epon AF-706 set the standard. The Wilson Staff Launch Pad and Cleveland Launcher HB Turbo may be better choices for those seeking ultimate forgiveness.

COST

Even the best super game-improvement irons tend to be less expensive than their counterparts in other categories. For example, a set of Tour Edge HL4 Irons is an exceptional value at just $489.99. Premium options do exist, however. The PING G710 at $1,137. A plethora of options exist between those two extremes. If you plan to invest in a new set of irons, be sure to get fitted by a professional.

Best Forgiveness - Wilson Staff Launch Pad

Best Forgiveness - Wilson Staff Launch Pad

The Wilson Staff Launch Pad bested the field in the forgiveness category. Like most of the best super game-improvement irons, the Launch Pad isn't going to wow with its looks or feel. but it absolutely performs. If you want a tighter dispersion, this is the club to consider.

FIELD NOTES

During each test, we look for insight into where the market as a whole is moving. Furthermore, we analyze noteworthy changes manufacturers have made to improve year-over-year performance. Throughout testing, we solicit feedback from our testing pool. Although the testers’ subjective feedback can be enlightening, it has zero impact on the overall rankings.

Trends and Tweaks

  • The Cobra F Max Airspeed, our pick as the best super game-improvement iron, blew away the competition in this year’s test from a strokes-gained standpoint. A key intriguing point is that it is exceptionally shorter than the rest of the field. Is this due to loft? Loft can certainly play a factor. In the end, the club performs and provides outstanding consistency across the board. That being said, if you’re looking for more distance, this isn’t the one for you.
  • Much like the 2019 Most Wanted Super Game Improvement Iron test, the “hybrid” style iron is thrown into the mix as is hollow-body construction. Cleveland Launcher HB Turbo, Wilson Staff Launch Pad, Cobra T-Rail and Tour Edge HL4 all feature a “hybrid” style design throughout the set. Why? The center of gravity is repositioned even lower and further back in the clubhead versus a traditional iron. The results: more forgiveness, better launch and potentially higher ball speeds.
  • Technology is constantly changing. Over the past couple of years, Callaway has pushed the envelope with AI-powered designs. The Callaway Mavrik featured this in our 2020 Most Wanted Game Improvement Iron test. In this test, Callaway Mavrik Max continues the utilization of artificial intelligence. By using AI, Callaway creates their Flash Face Cup Technology that boasts unique performance for each individual iron.
  • The PING G710 comes stock with Arccos Golf. This is quite the offering in a set of irons and can provide excellent on-course feedback for golfers of all skill levels. If the PING G710 isn’t for you but you love tracking data on the golf course, the Arccos Caddie Smart Grips are a great alternative.
Best Distance - Tommy Armour 845 Max

Best Distance - Tommy Armour 845 Max

The Tommy Armour 845 Max brought plenty of firepower to this year's test. Testers continually praised the product throughout the testing process. The consistent distance it displayed was one of the many positives surrounding the club in this year's test. If you are searching for more distance, this is one of the best super game-improvement irons available right now.

Notes from the Testing Pool

The following section details subjective feedback from our pool of 20 testers. While it is meant to highlight some of the feedback during the test, it is important to note that what a tester feels is the best super game-improvement iron, doesn’t always correlate with the data.

  • Super game improvement irons are not renowned for visual appeal. However, there was a handful of irons that stood out in terms of looks. Testers praised the Callaway Mavrik Max, the Epon AF-706, the XXIO Eleven and the Cobra F Max Airspeed.
  • Three specific clubs threw the testers a curveball in terms of looks: Cobra T-Rail, Tour Edge Exotics EXS 220H and PING G710. All three featured a dark finish. Testers had mixed feelings regarding the finish as a whole. Collectively, they thought the bottom white line highlighted on each iron assisted in alignment and squaring the face at address.
  • Is a rebirth coming? Well, testers were certainly pleased with the Tommy Armour 845 Max for feel and looks. “Phenomenal across the board,” commented one tester.
  • Among the best super game-improvement irons are “hybrid style” irons like the Cleveland Launcher HB Turbo, Wilson Staff Launch Pad, Tour Edge HL4 and Cobra T-Rail. While some testers conceded that designs made the clubs easier to hit, some couldn’t get over the looks. On a positive note, a handful of testers said the Cleveland Launcher HB Turbo was the best looking of the hybrid group.

2020 Most Wanted Super Game Improvement Iron Data

To filter and compare by club, use the drop-down list and checkboxes to select the only the clubs you wish to compare.

EXPERT TIP - SHAFT MATERIAL

Although steel shafts dominate the testing pool, graphite shafts are becoming more suitable for higher swing speed players. The perception is steel shafts are for stronger, faster swinging players. Whereas, graphite shafts are not. Be open minded towards the shaft material in your next set of irons. The appropriate shaft material can lead to tighter dispersion and tighter launch conditions, and graphite shafts might just be the ticket to those attributes.

2020 Most Wanted Super Game Improvement Product Specs

2020 Most Wanted Super Game Improvement Iron Product Specs

ProductPW LoftPW Length7 Iron Loft7 Iron Length5 Iron Loft5 Iron Length
Callaway Mavrik Max

Check Price
43.535.529.5372338.125
Cleveland Launcher HB Turbo

Check Price
43.2535.62530.2537.1252338.25
Cobra F Max Airspeed

Check Price
4735.3753236.7526.2537.875
Cobra T-Rail

Check Price
4435.3753136.752438
Epon AF-706

Check Price
39.7535.7527.53721.7538
PING G710

Check Price
43.7535.529.75372338.25
Tommy Armour 845 Max

Check Price
453530.537.12523.537.875
Tour Edge HL4

Check Price
43.535.53137.12526.538.125
Tour Edge HL4 Iron

Check Price
43.535.7530.53724.7538.125
Tour Edge Exotics EXS 220H

Check Price
41.7535.529.536.87521.7538.125
Wilson Staff Launch Pad

Check Price
44.535.62531.537.3752538.25
XXIO Eleven

Check Price
41.7535.62529.536.87521.7538

* denotes measured value versus manufacturer’s stated spec.

FAQ

BUYING NEW IRONS

Q: How often should I buy new irons?

A: While on rare occasions there are quantifiable year-over-year breakthroughs, typically it takes three to five years for manufacturers to make any significant performance gains. With the USGA further tightening restrictions on manufacturers, it’s possible, even likely, that it will take longer still moving forward. Our recommendation is to buy new irons only when they appreciably outperform what is already in your bag. Of course, if you want new irons just because you want new irons, be our guest.

Q: How do I determine the right category of irons for me?

A: The four categories of irons we test are player’s (cavity backs), player’s distance, game improvement and super game improvement. While there is some overlap between categories, your search should begin with an honest assessment of your skill level (handicap), as well as what you need in your game. If your handicap is above 10 and ball-striking is not a legitimate strength, consider game improvement or super game improvement. For more skilled players who hit the ball more consistently, a set of player’s irons or player’s distance irons may benefit your game the most. For those on the bubble, especially for those seeking a few more yards, the player’s distance category could be ideal.

Q: Does the shaft matter?

A: Absolutely. Shaft changes frequently lead to improved accuracy, tighter dispersion and greater overall consistency.

Q: What should I look for when testing irons?

A: While golfers have been conditioned to consider distance to the exclusion of nearly everything else, even within the super game-improvement category, we recommended looking at the little numbers and looking for small circles. When comparing metrics like distance and ball speed, be sure to look at your standard deviations (the small numbers usually found under the big ones on the data screen). Smaller numbers mean better consistency, which will usually mean more than an extra yard or two on the golf course. Similarly, look for tighter dispersion ellipses (small circles). We can’t overstate the importance of consistency with irons.

Use The Shaft to Improve Accuracy

While golfers typically think of the shaft as a means to optimize launch and spin, the reality is the shaft will often have a greater impact on accuracy and dispersion. Factors like weight, stiffness, and torque all play a role in how the club-head bends and twists as it's delivered to the ball. Consider these factors while getting fitted for a new set of irons.

MOST WANTED

Q: How are the irons in the test fitted to each golfer?

A: We use a fitting process that we call fit from stock. Irons are fitted to each tester using the stock, no up-charge options from each manufacturer. We test one short iron, one mid-iron and one long iron from each set. While there are no irons in our testing that feature adjustability, we fit to flex for each tester in the pool. Occasionally, manufacturers will send multiple sets with different stock shafts that we can utilize to improve launch conditions.

Q: How do you determine in which category to test a given set of irons?

A: To ensure we’re testing irons as alike as designers allow for, in addition to the design of the head itself (profile, sole width, etc.), we sort by length and loft. Our goal is to keep differences as minimal as possible within any test cohort. When an iron reasonably fits in more than one category, we defer to the manufacturer’s category choice.

Q: How is the Most Wanted- Best Super Game Improvement Iron 2020 determined?

A: To determine our rankings, we collect key performance metrics with Foresight GCQuad Launch Monitors. After eliminating outliers, we use a utilize a proprietary methodology to calculate Strokes Gained values for each combination of tester and golf club. The iron that produces the highest Strokes Gained values relative to the field average is our Most Wanted.

Q: How is the “longest” iron determined?

A: The process to determine the longest game improvement iron is similar to how we arrive at our overall rankings. For distance, our critical metric is Total Yards. We identify the iron that produced the most total yards with the long and middle irons relative to the field average.

Q: How is the “most forgiving” iron determined?

A: We’ve taken a practical approach to forgiveness. The club for which Strokes Gained values for the best shots are closest to the Strokes Gained value for the worst shots (relative to the field average) is the Most Forgiving.

Q: You discuss subjective feedback for things like looks, sound and feel. How much do those ratings factor into your rankings?

A: ZERO. Our rankings are based purely on launch monitor data and quantifiable performance metrics.

For You

For You

Golf Shafts
Apr 14, 2024
Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
News
Apr 14, 2024
A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
Drivers
Apr 13, 2024
Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

Our mission is #ConsumerFirst. We are here to help educate and empower golfers. We want you to get the most out of your money, time and performance. That means providing you with equipment reviews you can trust, as well as honest reporting on the latest issues affecting the game today. #PowerToThePlayer

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

Driver Ping G30 Hybrids PXG 0317
3/4 IRON PXG 0311XF 5-GW Srixon Z 565
SW PXG 0317 LW PXG 0311
Putter EVNROLL  
MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy

MyGolfSpy





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Jack

      2 years ago

      So the short story of why the Cobra did so well is that is more accurate than the others ?

      Reply

      Theebdk

      3 years ago

      I am surprised that the Epon AF-706 is listed as a super game improvement and is not in the game improvement test. The advertising on the website clearly labels it as “Game Improvement”. If included in the Game Improvement test I believe the comparative statistics would be different.

      As a mid-handicapper (13.5) I went to a fitter, with trackman, and tried 8 different heads. Most were in the game improvement category. The Epon Af-706 was head and shoulders above the rest in performance especially in ball speed, peak height, and distance. We did test a number of shafts and I moved from regular to senior. Had the clubs for just a few rounds and already the GIR is up and the scores trending down. Still getting used to the clubs as they are a beast in the distance category. Appreciate they are jacked lofts but they hold greens extremely well. I know that one person’s experience is different than across a series of testers.

      Reply

      James

      3 years ago

      I’ve only been playing for three years and from my perspective the key differentiator is forgiveness. I started playing Tour Edge HL2 metal woods. Then I moved to the G700. Swings I got away with before I no longer could because the G700 was less forgiving. It forced me to become a better ball striker. I just got fitted into the JPX 921 HM. It’s less forgiving than my current G700s (lose 10 yds on bad swings, on good ones they’re a touch farther), but it will force me to continue and improve. Hopefully in 3-4 years I will be ready for a players distance iron. I’m fortunate to have the time to work on my game, so I’m always looking with one eye forward. My goal is to find an iron I can grow into while not completely destroying my game based on my current ability. MSG is a great starting point. They try and use hard data vs other golf outlets that are just glorified ads.

      Reply

      ryebread

      3 years ago

      Some quick thoughts:
      – This is my favorite MGS test of the year because I think it is the one that can help most golfers.
      – I like that MGS found more “mere mortal” type swing speed testers. Maybe I missed it, but what were the average handicaps of this testing pool?
      – I’ve owned or hit most of these (or very similar models that are previous versions). For me the best “still being sold as new” SGI offering from the top US OEMS is the TM MCGB. I know it is an “older” release in that it wasn’t launched this season, but I think it launches higher, lands steeper than several of these, and my dispersion circles are tighter.
      – I’m curious as to which shafts were tested on each of these. These sets often come with super light weight graphite shafts vs. a pretty “cheap” steel shaft and there might be a 50 gram difference in those.
      – As with anything, testers should hit these themselves. I would argue there’s more performance difference between say a hybrid iron design and a slightly larger GI styled iron than there is between say two blades.
      – Gap testing is way more important than distance. Distance is really just club specs, but getting good gaps reflects a well designed set.. I know that gap testing is expensive (have to have all the clubs in a set), and that it takes a lot more shots and thus is harder to collect.

      Reply

      dski93

      3 years ago

      How is forgiveness determined?

      Reply

      Chris Nickel

      3 years ago

      Covered in the Q/A portion of the article.

      Q: How is the “most forgiving” iron determined?

      A: We’ve taken a practical approach to forgiveness. The club for which Strokes Gained values for the best shots are closest to the Strokes Gained value for the worst shots (relative to the field average) is the Most Forgiving.

      Reply

      dski93

      3 years ago

      I guess what I should have asked is how do I tell the rankings/ratings for forgiveness outside the 5 in the most wanted table at the top?

      There is no ranking table, no yards from center or shot area, std deviation in the data tables to ascertain some of this.

      scott

      3 years ago

      The term strokes gained. How can you tell if you gain stokes with a test ? You can test for distance forgiveness and dispersion but strokes gained seem like a stretch

      Reply

      Chris Nickel

      3 years ago

      Covered in the Q/A portion of the article.

      Q: How is the Most Wanted- Best Super Game Improvement Iron 2020 determined?

      A: To determine our rankings, we collect key performance metrics with Foresight GCQuad Launch Monitors. After eliminating outliers, we use a utilize a proprietary methodology to calculate Strokes Gained values for each combination of tester and golf club. The iron that produces the highest Strokes Gained values relative to the field average is our Most Wanted.

      Reply

      Bradford

      3 years ago

      Every time I see MGS test results, that come no where near to my own vast experience with a set, I have to question how valid the results are? I used Tour Edge HL2, before moving to Tour Edge HL4, so I have a couple of seasons of experience playing golf 3 to 4 times a week in Florida. With the HL 4’s, my SW, goes the same distance as any PW I have ever tried, and I have tried them all. Dead accurate as well. HL4’s are stupid easy to hit and the distance is certainly better than your results show. The bottom line is to test clubs yourself, sorry MGS, you bring out testers for one test that get results so skewed from actual golf experience, I have to wonder why that is? I could buy any irons I want, however, never change from HL. They work that good. I wonder how many golfers MGS convinces to purchase a set from their testing results and when they get the clubs out on the course, they find out the results are much different than the MGS test results? Something else I will throw out? All the new expensive clubs touted on MGS each and every year, do not work any better for amateurs than the clubs they already own if they are only a couple years old.

      Reply

      Tim

      3 years ago

      “ All the new expensive clubs touted on MGS each and every year, do not work any better …”. That’s a pretty strong claim. You’ve tried them all. I own Cleveland HLs and MGS’s description is pretty good. I think I’ll stick with MGS’s more scientific approach.

      Reply

      Marq

      3 years ago

      A couple of points here. Do I find the MGS articles on new clubs informative? Yes. Do I treat them as gospel. Hell no! Every club in my bag, I have tested and/or got fitted for. Regarding drivers, the “spring” off the face is already maxed out so no single clubhead will go 30 yards more,. Fitting will optimize your performance though with shafts, head adjustments, etc. Golf is such an individual game you have to see what works for you personally. As for new clubs versus older ones, depends on the clubs and how old we’re talking here. Regarding drivers, if you’re playing one from 5-6 years ago, yes, there’s been improvement since then. Irons, well, you first have to compare clubs by loft degrees, not
      the number on the club. My current 7i plays like a 6i from an older set I have. I do hit the new one better, that’s why I went with it. But only an idiot thinks clubs are so much longer today without taking into account the stronger lofts vs yesteryear. Again, do your fitting and your testing and you can rest assured that you’re playing the clubs that suit you the best.

      Reply

      Rich

      3 years ago

      Just went from Hogan Edge irons to Tour Edge C521 irons with graphite shafts…very good move as I needed more forgiving irons as age has caught up with me…..Bought from Tour Edge site, they bent them one degree flat for free and sent them 2 day air for free. (a set of game improvement irons under $500 and they bent them??) gave me back about 7 yards for sure on each iron….and was able to actually get a four iron up in the air 175 yards ( been few years I could not do that). Recommend if you are not in the $1000 market and need irons…

      Reply

      Erock

      3 years ago

      It was mentioned that setup makeup is a big part of SGI sets. Also mentioned that the T-rail has a 4h as part of the combo set. But in your testing it looks like a 5/7/PW were testing. Were any 5 hybrids used as part of the test or were they all 5 irons?

      Reply

      Peter J

      3 years ago

      The Cobra F Max irons are impressive and the only reason for less distance is purely because of higher lofts on all irons.
      I agree totally with comments from MYGOLFSPY that more mid to high handicappers should be using these types of irons and forget about their appearances.
      Whilst waiting for a new set of Mizuno JPX 921 Hot Metals, the golf shop let me use a set of Cleveland HB Launchers..I played about ten rounds with them.
      Right from the first round I found the Cleveland’s the easiest ever irons to use. Extremely, forgiving and what impressed me most was how consistent all iron were from the PW to the 5 iron. Normally I can’t achieve any consistency with a 5 iron
      The Mizuno’s arrived and The Cleveland’s were returned.!
      Three rounds with the Mizuno’s and I’m not scoring as well as I was with the Cleveland’s..
      The Cleveland’s are not eye catching but very effective

      Reply

      Tim

      3 years ago

      I agree. The HB’s are great for higher handicappers.

      Reply

      Ian

      3 years ago

      In one sentence, what this test shows is that launch and spin are king when it comes to strokes gained.

      Reply

      Peter

      3 years ago

      I am a mid handicapper. I was using Srixon Z565 irons. Whilst waiting for a new set of Mizuno JPX 921 Hot Metal, the golf shop let me use a set of Cleveland Launcher HB irons with graphite shafts.
      My experience with the Cleveland’s left me questioning why I was buying the Mizuno’s. For me the Cleveland’s performed as well if not better than any set of irons I have used. to date.. I found them so easy to use, very consistent and surprisingly they felt and sounded good.
      The bonus was the 5 iron which was so consistent, forgiving. The only downside to the Cleveland’s is the design which is not the most attractive.
      I was reluctant to return the Cleveland’s to the golf shop when the Mizuno’s arrived.
      After a few rounds with the Mizuno’s, I am yet to find them as consistent or easy to use as the Cleveland’s. However, the Mizuno’s look great but that doesn’t give me lower scores!

      Reply

      John A

      3 years ago

      I was wondering the exact same thing…..

      Reply

      Geoffrey Hochenstein

      3 years ago

      Cobra F-Max loft is weaker than the others. Pretty much accounts for the difference in yardage.

      Reply

      Jonathan Rowe

      3 years ago

      Something’s off on the data for the XXIO 11. In the graphic bar chart, it has it as a very small positive value of strokes gained for the mid-iron – like maybe the 5th or 6th longest bar for that category. However, in the chart with the actual numbers, it is the second highest strokes gained for the mid-iron.

      Reply

      MARK C MISCHENKO

      3 years ago

      Last fitted/purchased clubs in 2013 (Titleist/3w, Callaway/3-5h, Ping/5-Uw). Over the past 2-3yrs (prior 2020) — While hitting hybrids consistently, experienced at least 1-1.5 club-loss in distance with the 3w & irons. So, added a driver & the Cobra T-Rail hybrid-irons (4h-Pw) — Regained the lost yardage! The Super-light shaft option gets me distance, higher trajectory, tighter dispersion & more forgiveness.

      Reply

      Steve S

      3 years ago

      In my continuing study of irons(I have a spreadsheet that lists models, lofts, lengths, etc.) it is apparent that loft does matter. Cobra has the guts to go back to what I call “early 2000’s standard lofts”. The number on the bottom of the iron doesn’t mean much until you get to the long irons. Even then it’s all about distance gaps. A 21.75 degree 5 iron is a joke; that’s basically a 3 iron in my MX25 set. I’ll bet many high handicappers can’t get that “5 iron” in the air any more than the 3 iron from the MX25. The reason why most of these clubs are fitted with light weight “high launch” shafts is an attempt to compensate for the lack of loft.

      Reply

      Geoffrey Hochenstein

      3 years ago

      Yep, the whole jacked lofts is ridiculous. I had someone complaining to me that Wilson FG Tour V6’s were short. on distance. Turns out they were comparing a 34* lofted club’s distance to a 28* lofted club’s distance. Go figure.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Shafts
    Apr 14, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Autoflex Dream 7 Driver Shaft
    News
    Apr 14, 2024
    A Rare Masters ‘L’: Day Asked To Remove Sweater
    Drivers
    Apr 13, 2024
    Testers Wanted: Callaway Ai Smoke Drivers
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.