Not Odyssey, Not Scotty Cameron: This Brand Delivered Elite Mallet Putter Results
Buyer's Guide

Not Odyssey, Not Scotty Cameron: This Brand Delivered Elite Mallet Putter Results

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Not Odyssey, Not Scotty Cameron: This Brand Delivered Elite Mallet Putter Results

I’m an underdog person. Doesn’t matter the sport or the story, if there’s an underdog, that’s who I’m rooting for. So you can imagine when one shows up in a putter test, I’m paying close attention. In this case, the underdog is Ben Hogan and these two mallets seriously overdelivered in our 2026 Most Wanted Mallet test. If you’re looking for a $250 putter that can hang with the big names, keep reading.

Ben Hogan BHM02

The BHM02 finished tied for third overall out of 29 mallets tested with a -5.7 PuttView Handicap. What makes that result interesting is how balanced it was. The BHM02 didn’t have a bad category.

It ranked fifth in the field on long putts at -8.9, a score that beat both Scotty Cameron Phantoms, every Odyssey and every PING in the test. At medium range it posted -4.0, third best among all 29 mallets. Make rate came in at 45.5 percent, ahead of the Scotty Cameron Phantom 9 at 44.2.

If you struggle with inconsistency, the BHM02 is worth your attention. It doesn’t have a glaring weakness. Testers noted good distance control and solid feel at address.

Ben Hogan BHM03

The BHM03 also finished tied for third at -5.7 overall but it got there on the strength of one exceptional number. Its -5.9 in the medium putt category was the best score in the entire 29-putter field. Medium putts are where PuttView Handicap differences tend to be most pronounced, making it the most meaningful of the three distance categories. The BHM03 also tied for the highest make rate in the test at 45.8 percent, alongside the Bettinardi BB 6.0 and Ballistic Reaper.

The tradeoff is long putts where its -6.6 sits in the bottom half of the field. If you’re someone who regularly faces 30-foot lag putts and distance control from far away is a priority, the BHM02 is the better fit. If you’re looking to convert more of the medium-length putts in that 12- to 15-foot range, the BHM03 has a stronger data argument than almost anything else in this test—at any price.

Final thought

Ben Hogan has two mallet putters that finished tied for third in a 29-putter field, beat multiple putters costing nearly twice as much, and did it at $249.99. Take a look at all of the mallet putter results here: Best Mallet Putters of 2026.

img

MyGolfSpy Testing Toolkit

World-class testing requires world-class equipment. This is the gear we trust to help us fulfill our Most Wanted testing.

For You

For You

Callaway Quantum driver with a Tri=Force face Callaway Quantum driver with a Tri=Force face
Drivers
Jun 3, 2026
Does Callaway’s New Tri-Force Face Technology Really Work? What We Found Might Shock You
Labs
Jun 3, 2026
Callaway Chrome Tour (2026) Ball Lab
Instruction
Jun 3, 2026
Three Things Slow Swing Speed Golfers Should Look For In A New Driver
Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz

Britt Olizarowicz is a scratch golfer, former teaching professional and one of MyGolfSpy’s leading voices on equipment testing and golf performance. She has spent more than 15 years working at private clubs in New York and Florida and now specializes in translating test data and swing mechanics into practical advice for everyday golfers. Britt began playing at age 7 and has never left the game. When she’s not writing, you’ll find her on the course, playing pickleball, cooking, running or out on the boat with her family.

Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Robert Melvin

      7 seconds ago

      For all these type of different putters, there are usually hosel options and in the testing, it is never mentioned what type of hosel was used for each putter and some models don’t have a different model number for each type of hosel – For the Ben Hogan models used in the test what type of hosel was used for the 2 models?

      Reply

      Mark R

      9 minutes ago

      I’m an engineer. Hard data, not marketing spin or big brand logos, matter to me. If the Hogan performs better and is available at a more competitive price than a big brand’s $500 putter, easy decision.

      One of my Wed night league players brags about his Scotty prototype ($2200). Nice headcover. Looks great in the bag of “Dougie the 3-putter”. Don’t be that guy.

      Reply

      Tim

      29 minutes ago

      Too many premium options (see TM Spider) were left out to trust this test.

      Reply

      Mike

      2 hours ago

      Nice to see that you don’t have to spend $500+ just to think you’ve bought a ‘good’ putter. As with any putter though, knowing how to putt (properly) helps.

      Reply

      Fake

      3 hours ago

      I’d really like to see Hogan and MacGregor enter the ZT space. With Wilson, Tour Edge and LAZRUS offering $200 options, can they go even lower?

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Callaway Quantum driver with a Tri=Force face Callaway Quantum driver with a Tri=Force face
    Drivers
    Jun 3, 2026
    Does Callaway’s New Tri-Force Face Technology Really Work? What We Found Might Shock You
    Labs
    Jun 3, 2026
    Callaway Chrome Tour (2026) Ball Lab
    Instruction
    Jun 3, 2026
    Three Things Slow Swing Speed Golfers Should Look For In A New Driver