Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.
Blade putters are icons of golf equipment, second perhaps only to the driver or golf ball in recognizability. The question is: which one is the best for 2026?
We continue to raise the bar for putter testing with our technologically advanced approach, all thanks to our partnership with PuttView. This collaboration enables us to provide golfers everywhere with the most independent and reliable putter testing and results available.
No other review offers this level of comprehensive putter analysis, which is built solely on objective, hard data—no marketing fluff. We let the numbers speak for themselves.
Our 2026 test field featured 24 blade putters, including established top brands and promising newcomers. Did a new face manage to stand out? Keep reading to find out.
After 120 hours of testing and sinking 15,360 putts, the official 2026 Most Wanted Blade Putter results are here, powered by PuttView.
These are the definitive best blade putters of 2026.
Ultimately, the best blade putters are the ones with the best PuttView Handicap. Some crush the field at a specific distance, while others offer a more balanced performance from short, medium and long range putts. Regardless of how they get to the podium, each offers exceptional performance benefits versus the field.
These are the best blade putters overall.
PuttView HCP Overall
PuttView HCP Short
PuttView HCP Medium
PuttView HCP Long
Price
In putter testing, short to mid-range performance is critical; struggles on putts between 4 and 12 feet will translate to real trouble on the golf course. The Mizuno M.Craft Osaka stands out as the best blade putter, evidenced by its superior PuttView Handicap average across all three putting ranges: short, mid, and long.
Despite data suggesting that severe toe hang benefits the Mizuno M.Craft Osaka, some golfers simply do not prefer or require that level of toe hang in their putter. If you fall into this group, this putter might not be the best choice for you.
The Mizuno M.Craft Osaka is the top-performing blade putter for 2026. Our PuttView data highlights that performance from 4-12 feet significantly impacts overall results. The Osaka putter delivers exceptional all-around performance across short, mid, and long-range putts. Its primary strength is its leading performance on short putts, complemented by its second-place ranking on mid-range putts. This combination of short-to-mid range excellence secures its number one ranking, while also placing sixth on long-range putts.
“Weighting is solid, address is clean, and easy to align.”
“Love the milled face. Distance control was consistent.”
“Don’t like the corded grip. Set up very easily. Loved the color combo and the alignment.”
“Great balance and flow during the putting stroke. Felt extremely confident with it. Beautiful design.”
The Mizuno M.Craft Osaka putter demands attention. While Mizuno may not be widely known for their putters, this model delivered an impressive all-around performance, earning a win in our best blade putters of 2026. Golfers should check out this unexpected standout immediately.
PuttView HCP Overall
PuttView HCP Short
PuttView HCP Medium
PuttView HCP Long
Price
Missing shorter putts can significantly hurt your overall performance. If you're looking to regain confidence over those crucial short-range putts, the PING Scottsdale Anser 4 could be the solution. Highly rated for its subjective appeal, this putter might be just the golden ticket you need.
Despite its second place overall finish, the PING Scottsdale Anser 4 showed average to below-average performance on mid-to-long range putts, a conclusion supported by the collected data.
The PING Scottsdale Anser 4 secured the runner-up spot in our Best Blade Putters of 2026 ranking. This second-place finish is largely thanks to its excellent performance on short putts. Making these short putts is critically important—a point we cannot overstate. Whether you’re left with a 4-foot or shorter putt after a long lag, you need absolute confidence. The data confirms the Scottsdale Anser 4 is particularly effective at this crucial distance.
“The feel off the face is superb. Very balanced putter. Home run from PING.”
“Feel off the face is great. Jumps off the face so to speak.”
“Good balanced putter across the board. Putter did the work in the stroke.”
“Performance is great. Sleeper pick.”
The PING Scottsdale putter collection is exceptional, with the Anser 4 model standing out this year, particularly in performance on shorter putts. It proved to be one of the top performers across our testing pool of 20 golfers. Eliminating missed 3-4 foot putts is a significant benefit.
PuttView HCP Overall
PuttView HCP Short
PuttView HCP Medium
PuttView HCP Long
Price
Improving your performance on long putts is key to lowering your scores. Inconsistent distance control often leads to longer second putts, with no certainty of making the follow-up. The PING Scottsdale Anser 2D is a standout performer in this area. It achieved the best average PuttView Handicap on long putts, indicating that testers were highly successful at sinking putts and leaving second putts closer to the hole under this condition.
The Scottsdale putter line stands out as arguably PING's strongest in recent memory. Specifically, the Scottsdale Anser 2D delivers excellent results on longer putts, performing capably on short and mid-range attempts as well. For golfers who have historically overlooked PING putters, now might be the perfect time to give them another look.
The PING Scottsdale Anser 2D putter was highly recognized in our “Best Blade Putters of 2026” rankings. It secured the third overall position and was also named the best blade putter for performance on long putts. Furthermore, our testers rated it as the top blade putter for both feel and the likelihood of purchase.
“Very solid and true. Top choice so far. Good balance.”
“The roll is pure, end over end, minimal to zero skid.”
“Rolls the ball well, easier to putt with and keep online.”
“Excellent balance/feel/control.”
The PING Scottsdale Anser 2D putter was a personal favorite during testing, offering a notably pure roll. While the data unexpectedly showed lower performance on short to mid-range putts, it excelled in speed control and make percentages for longer putts. This putter might require a brief adjustment period, but it’s definitely worth considering.
The blade putters that make the most short putts are going to be top performers. At a short distance, you don’t want to be the putter that limits golfers’ ability to make putts. Missing short putts has a greater impact on PuttView Handicap relative to other distances.
These are the best blade putters for short putts.
PuttView HCP Short
PuttView HCP Medium
PuttView HCP Long
PuttView HCP Overall
Price
In putter testing, short to mid-range performance is critical; struggles on putts between 4 and 12 feet will translate to real trouble on the golf course. The Mizuno M.Craft Osaka stands out as the best blade putter, evidenced by its superior PuttView Handicap average across all three putting ranges: short, mid, and long.
Despite data suggesting that severe toe hang benefits the Mizuno M.Craft Osaka, some golfers simply do not prefer or require that level of toe hang in their putter. If you fall into this group, this putter might not be the best choice for you.
The Mizuno M.Craft Osaka is the top-performing blade putter for 2026. Our PuttView data highlights that performance from 4-12 feet significantly impacts overall results. The Osaka putter delivers exceptional all-around performance across short, mid, and long-range putts. Its primary strength is its leading performance on short putts, complemented by its second-place ranking on mid-range putts. This combination of short-to-mid range excellence secures its number one ranking, while also placing sixth on long-range putts.
“Weighting is solid, address is clean, and easy to align.”
“Love the milled face. Distance control was consistent.”
“Don’t like the corded grip. Set up very easily. Loved the color combo and the alignment.”
“Great balance and flow during the putting stroke. Felt extremely confident with it. Beautiful design.”
The Mizuno M.Craft Osaka putter demands attention. While Mizuno may not be widely known for their putters, this model delivered an impressive all-around performance, earning a win in our best blade putters of 2026. Golfers should check out this unexpected standout immediately.
PuttView HCP Short
PuttView HCP Medium
PuttView HCP Long
PuttView HCP Overall
Price
Missing shorter putts can significantly hurt your overall performance. If you're looking to regain confidence over those crucial short-range putts, the PING Scottsdale Anser 4 could be the solution. Highly rated for its subjective appeal, this putter might be just the golden ticket you need.
Despite its second place overall finish, the PING Scottsdale Anser 4 showed average to below-average performance on mid-to-long range putts, a conclusion supported by the collected data.
The PING Scottsdale Anser 4 secured the runner-up spot in our Best Blade Putters of 2026 ranking. This second-place finish is largely thanks to its excellent performance on short putts. Making these short putts is critically important—a point we cannot overstate. Whether you’re left with a 4-foot or shorter putt after a long lag, you need absolute confidence. The data confirms the Scottsdale Anser 4 is particularly effective at this crucial distance.
“The feel off the face is superb. Very balanced putter. Home run from PING.”
“Feel off the face is great. Jumps off the face so to speak.”
“Good balanced putter across the board. Putter did the work in the stroke.”
“Performance is great. Sleeper pick.”
The PING Scottsdale putter collection is exceptional, with the Anser 4 model standing out this year, particularly in performance on shorter putts. It proved to be one of the top performers across our testing pool of 20 golfers. Eliminating missed 3-4 foot putts is a significant benefit.
We can’t stress this enough – making putts at medium or mid-range is game-changing. In the past, we had 10’ putts. At this distance, we saw the great separation in performance between the best and worst putters. This remains true despite the integration of PuttView and changing some internal parameters. If a putter excels at mid-range, it will likely make its way to the top of the leaderboard, and in the case of this year, propel a putter to victory.
These are the best blade putters for medium putts.
PuttView HCP Medium
PuttView HCP Short
PuttView HCP Long
PuttView HCP Overall
Price
The Bettinardi BB-8W is a top performer for golfers who are confident with short and long putts but struggle with mid-range consistency. This is a crucial distance, and improving performance here is vital for saving your golf round, whether you're trying to sink a birdie, par, or bogey putt.
The Bettinardi BB-8W demonstrates inconsistent performance on shorter putts compared to the competition. A lower PuttView Handicap in this category correlates with a higher miss percentage, which is an undesirable trait for golfers seeking reliability. Conversely, the BB-8W truly shines with exceptional performance on both mid-range and long-range putts.
The Bettinardi BB-8W secures the number one position in our mid-range putting category, largely due to its superior consistency. Historically, this specific distance in putter testing is where performance differences are most pronounced. The BB-8W demonstrated the best average PuttView Handicap from these key distances, giving it a significant performance advantage.
“Loved the deeper sole and the grip was great. Its edges made hand positioning easy and repeatable.”
“Good weighting, balance, everything synced, and good visuals.”
“Great look, love the color scheme. Rolls the ball well.”
“Feels solid. Good feedback. Felt more confident with the wider profile than the BB-1.”
The Bettinardi BB-8W is an outstanding performer, particularly noted for being the best blade putter on medium-length putts and offering excellent results on long putts—a significant achievement. Unfortunately, its overall performance is hindered by subpar results from short putts. So, be wary of using this putter if shorter putts are your kryptonite.
PuttView HCP Medium
PuttView HCP Short
PuttView HCP Long
PuttView HCP Overall
Price
In putter testing, short to mid-range performance is critical; struggles on putts between 4 and 12 feet will translate to real trouble on the golf course. The Mizuno M.Craft Osaka stands out as the best blade putter, evidenced by its superior PuttView Handicap average across all three putting ranges: short, mid, and long.
Despite data suggesting that severe toe hang benefits the Mizuno M.Craft Osaka, some golfers simply do not prefer or require that level of toe hang in their putter. If you fall into this group, this putter might not be the best choice for you.
The Mizuno M.Craft Osaka is the top-performing blade putter for 2026. Our PuttView data highlights that performance from 4-12 feet significantly impacts overall results. The Osaka putter delivers exceptional all-around performance across short, mid, and long-range putts. Its primary strength is its leading performance on short putts, complemented by its second-place ranking on mid-range putts. This combination of short-to-mid range excellence secures its number one ranking, while also placing sixth on long-range putts.
“Weighting is solid, address is clean, and easy to align.”
“Love the milled face. Distance control was consistent.”
“Don’t like the corded grip. Set up very easily. Loved the color combo and the alignment.”
“Great balance and flow during the putting stroke. Felt extremely confident with it. Beautiful design.”
The Mizuno M.Craft Osaka putter demands attention. While Mizuno may not be widely known for their putters, this model delivered an impressive all-around performance, earning a win in our best blade putters of 2026. Golfers should check out this unexpected standout immediately.
Being consistent with longer putts is a key ingredient for performance. Making putts helps, but also maintaining speed control and closer proximity to the hole are critical factors. The putters that achieve these three performance traits rise to the top.
These are the best blade putters for long putts.
PuttView HCP Long
PuttView HCP Short
PuttView HCP Medium
PuttView HCP Overall
Price
Improving your performance on long putts is key to lowering your scores. Inconsistent distance control often leads to longer second putts, with no certainty of making the follow-up. The PING Scottsdale Anser 2D is a standout performer in this area. It achieved the best average PuttView Handicap on long putts, indicating that testers were highly successful at sinking putts and leaving second putts closer to the hole under this condition.
The Scottsdale putter line stands out as arguably PING's strongest in recent memory. Specifically, the Scottsdale Anser 2D delivers excellent results on longer putts, performing capably on short and mid-range attempts as well. For golfers who have historically overlooked PING putters, now might be the perfect time to give them another look.
The PING Scottsdale Anser 2D putter was highly recognized in our “Best Blade Putters of 2026” rankings. It secured the third overall position and was also named the best blade putter for performance on long putts. Furthermore, our testers rated it as the top blade putter for both feel and the likelihood of purchase.
“Very solid and true. Top choice so far. Good balance.”
“The roll is pure, end over end, minimal to zero skid.”
“Rolls the ball well, easier to putt with and keep online.”
“Excellent balance/feel/control.”
The PING Scottsdale Anser 2D putter was a personal favorite during testing, offering a notably pure roll. While the data unexpectedly showed lower performance on short to mid-range putts, it excelled in speed control and make percentages for longer putts. This putter might require a brief adjustment period, but it’s definitely worth considering.
PuttView HCP Long
PuttView HCP Short
PuttView HCP Medium
PuttView HCP Overall
Price
The Bettinardi BB-8W is a top performer for golfers who are confident with short and long putts but struggle with mid-range consistency. This is a crucial distance, and improving performance here is vital for saving your golf round, whether you're trying to sink a birdie, par, or bogey putt.
The Bettinardi BB-8W demonstrates inconsistent performance on shorter putts compared to the competition. A lower PuttView Handicap in this category correlates with a higher miss percentage, which is an undesirable trait for golfers seeking reliability. Conversely, the BB-8W truly shines with exceptional performance on both mid-range and long-range putts.
The Bettinardi BB-8W secures the number one position in our mid-range putting category, largely due to its superior consistency. Historically, this specific distance in putter testing is where performance differences are most pronounced. The BB-8W demonstrated the best average PuttView Handicap from these key distances, giving it a significant performance advantage.
“Loved the deeper sole and the grip was great. Its edges made hand positioning easy and repeatable.”
“Good weighting, balance, everything synced, and good visuals.”
“Great look, love the color scheme. Rolls the ball well.”
“Feels solid. Good feedback. Felt more confident with the wider profile than the BB-1.”
The Bettinardi BB-8W is an outstanding performer, particularly noted for being the best blade putter on medium-length putts and offering excellent results on long putts—a significant achievement. Unfortunately, its overall performance is hindered by subpar results from short putts. So, be wary of using this putter if shorter putts are your kryptonite.
All of our testing is predicated on data. Without it, our testing is irrelevant. With PuttView, our putter testing as a whole is enhanced forever. It goes from the best in the industry to, well, the definitive best in the industry.
In addition to the data implications, PuttView makes our putter tests significantly more dynamic. On the golf course, every putt is different: distance, slope, break, speed. While we’ve always tested putters from multiple distances, we weren’t able to integrate other aspects of putting that golfers experience on the golf course.
With our custom-developed randomized testing protocol, we’re able to replicate on-course putting more accurately. Every putter is tested under identical conditions. Every tester hits the same number of putts from uphill, downhill, left- and right-breaking and straight—but the exact locations are randomized. The hope is to prevent golfers from getting grooved in from one location, making the results more reflective of actual putting performance.
But the biggest leap forward is data and there is plenty of data.
As we become more familiar with the gold mine that is PuttView, our goal is to mine data, evaluate, and repurpose our findings into subsequent putter content.
In past putter tests, we’ve relied purely on strokes gained and total putts holed to determine our Most Wanted winners. Although these metrics provide a clear picture of which putters perform well throughout the testing process, they don’t give additional insights and they make results confusing.
We partnered with PuttView to create a more understandable result. Something that most golfers can relate to – a handicap.
PuttView Handicap is defined as:
“A measure of a player’s putting ability representing the number of strokes above or below par. The PuttView Handicap is calculated based on the Stokes Gained, i.e. compares the current performances with an average tour player for the given putt distances”
The PuttView Handicap scores dictate the overall results. They are broken down in three ranges:
The overall winner has the best PuttView Handicap average. These results are displayed in a way that a negative number represents a better score. Think of it like an actual golf handicap – a “plus” handicap represents a higher rated golfer. In the case of PuttView, a “negative” handicap represents a higher (better) rating.
Keep in mind that the results are based on an average tour player’s performance for the given putt distances.
Most Wanted Blade Putter testing took 120 hours and included 24 blade models. 20 avid golfers took part in the test.
Each tester hit 32 putts with each putter throughout the entirety of the test. The test scenario is completely randomized in order to create a more realistic putting experience. There are four distances during the test scenario:
Straight and flat putts are prioritized. Yet, with PuttView, we are able to implement uphill, downhill, left to right, and right to left braking putts. This further enhances the testing scenario and creates more realistic putting conditions. However, we approach it with balance as our goal is to test putter performance – not a golfer’s ability to read a green. Too many variations in the environment can water down the actual evaluation of putter performance.
| Putter Name | Overall PuttView Handicap | Short PuttView Handicap | Medium PuttView Handicap | Long PuttView Handicap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mizuno M.Craft Osaka | -5.5 | -6.5 | -1.8 | -7.4 |
| PING Scottsdale Anser 4 | -4.5 | -6.4 | 0.2 | -5.6 |
| PING Scottsdale Anser 2D | -4.3 | -3.4 | -0.9 | -9.3 |
| Evnroll Orgin ER2 | -3.8 | -3.6 | -0.1 | -8.0 |
| Cobra 3DP Tour Grandsport | -3.7 | -5.6 | 3.3 | -7.1 |
| LA GOLF Bel Air II DW | -3.7 | -3.3 | 0.1 | -8.5 |
| Scotty Cameron SS Newport 2 | -3.3 | -3.9 | 1.0 | -6.4 |
| PXG Brandon Battle Ready II | -3.2 | -4.1 | 2.8 | -7.4 |
| Ballistic Saber | -3.2 | -3.0 | 1.5 | -8.3 |
| Bettinardi BB-8W | -3.0 | -0.4 | -2.5 | -8.9 |
| Scotty Cameron SS Newport | -2.9 | -2.4 | -1.0 | -5.9 |
| Cobra MIM Sport | -2.7 | -2.7 | -1.0 | -4.5 |
| JAG Putter | -2.7 | -2.5 | 1.4 | -7.3 |
| Toulon Hollywood | -2.6 | -4.2 | 4.7 | -6.5 |
| Mizuno M.Craft Kyoto | -2.5 | -2.9 | 3.0 | -7.1 |
| Odyssey AI-Dual DW | -2.3 | -5.4 | 6.4 | -5.0 |
| Odyssey AI-Dual #1 | -2.3 | -1.1 | -0.4 | -6.5 |
| Sub 70 007W | -2.2 | -4.2 | 4.7 | -5.1 |
| LA GOLF Bel Air II | -2.0 | -0.6 | -0.1 | -6.7 |
| Runner Pro Blade | -2.0 | -1.3 | 1.3 | -6.7 |
| Bettinardi BB-1 | -1.8 | -1.8 | 1.5 | -5.0 |
| Makefield Proto | -0.5 | 1.1 | 2.3 | -6.3 |
| Sausage Golf Design No.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 5.8 | -5.5 |
| Edel The Brick | 0.9 | 0.6 | 7.2 | -4.7 |
Performance is key. It always has been and always will be. Based on the current evaluation parameters, there is a 6.4 difference in PuttView Handicap between the best and worst-performing blade putters overall.
Building on our first insight, short and medium putts tell the performance story, especially medium putts. We’ve always known medium putts create separation in performance. But now, we have a clearer understanding of how impactful poor putting on shorter putts can be as well as mid-range putts.
For short putts, there is a 7.6 PuttView Handicap differential from best to worst. This is a larger separation of PuttView Handicap relative to longer putts. Below, you’ll see the dispersion between the best and worst for short putts: Mizuno M.Craft Osaka and Makefield Blade.
For mid-range putts, there is a 9.7 PuttView Handicap differential from best to worst. It highlights how important it is to putt well on mid-range putts. This gap is slightly smaller relative to our 2025 blade putter test. Additionally, the winning score is lower relative to 2025.
Through two years of utilizing PuttView, we are seeing that short and mid-range putts have the most impact on overall performance. This shouldn’t come as a surprise, but only reiterates the need to be successful at these ranges.
Below is the dispersion between the best and worst mid-range putts: Bettinardi BB-8W and Edel “The Brick”.
For long putts, there is a 4.8 PuttView Handicap differential from best to worst. Making longer putts helps boost PuttView Handicap. However, close proximity to the hole helps as well. Having good speed and distance control is paramount to ensuring you can make the next putt.
Below is the dispersion between the best and worst putters for long putts: PING Scottsdale Anser 2D and COBRA MIM Sport.
Putting performance will obviously be influenced by making putts. However, you can still be effective and efficient without making a high percentage of putts. Proximity to the hole plays a huge role in overall performance, especially in the calculation of PuttView Handicap. You can make 50% of your putts, but depending on where you miss and how you miss can greatly affect performance.
During the 32-putt test scenario, testers hit a single putt from each starting location. PuttView registers where the ball comes to rest and applies a calculation. If you miss a 4’ putt severely and more than once, it’ll cripple a PuttView Handicap in a heartbeat. Whereas, missing a 20’ putt minimally might have less of an impact.
If you read through our entire guide on putter testing, you’ll see that there’s more than just personal preference that goes into choosing a putter. Everything from alignment aids to matching your putting stroke to the type of insert can be part of this process.
Here are some of our best tips when choosing a putter in 2026:
Use our Head to Head Comparison tool if you are stuck between which two putters could be best for your game.
World-class testing requires world-class equipment. This is the gear we trust to help us fulfill our Most Wanted testing.
Cancer Survivor. Amputee Golfer. Essentially, a OneLeggedBoss. When he isn't facilitating testing or analyzing data, Phillip enjoys his family time, practicing and playing golf, unwinding with video games, capturing photos of nature, or devouring pretzels.
| Driver Titleist GT3 | 3 Wood Titleist GT3 |
| 7 Wood Callaway Elyte Triple Diamond | Irons (5-PW) Srixon ZXi5 |
| Wedges (46, 50, 54, 58) Titleist Vokey SM10 | Putter L.A.B. MEZZ.1 MAX |
| Ball Titleist Pro V1x |
3 months ago
Surprised none of the photos shown look down on the putter . . . the view you’d have when actually putting?
3 months ago
I go to my favorite blade putter, a Ping PLD Anser 4D; when my Ping PLD Prime Tyne 4.0 “goes cold,” during every golf season (not sure why that is?) What was interesting is: when I went for the new PING PLD putter fitting, I had a Ping Vault 2.0 blade and I started my putter fitting with the Ping PLD Prime Tyne 4.0. I started rolling putts in the hole from every angle & distance. When I was offered a 2nd PING PLD putter fitting option and to try the “new” Ping PLD Anser 4D blade; I started rolling putts in the hole from every angle & distance. $700 in new Ping PLD putters later, I own both of them.
3 months ago
I have struggled with putting. I have a closet full of putters, however I purchased a Nordberg German SS Heritage 1. The Nordberg is simply the finest putter i have ever owned! I encourage folks to check them out!
3 months ago
These aren’t my idea of a blade putter, Wilson 8802, 8813, Bulldog blade. Proper, old school blades.
3 months ago
Miss my 8802. Lost it in a poker game back in the 70’s.
3 months ago
They (the golf industry) dumbed that meaning down years ago, I think I commented on one of the first tests in my disappointment. As the market percentage of true blade putters is so low, the heel-toe weighted (ironically the PING Anser putter was considered one of the most forgiving when they were released) putter users got a little ego boast. They’ve tried to blur the lines of what makes a bladed iron too, but I don’t think major OEMs want to mess with the cache of the MB label.
Sadly it’s been thirty-odd years since Mizuno released the TPM range of putters, a line-up of nearly all blades.
3 months ago
Out of all the clubs to be fitted for the book ends are the most important… Driver and Putter. Often when a person starts golf they use any old putter they can because the mindset is it is just a putt. My game dramatically changed when I went to my local golf store and found someone there who really knew putters. I had them watch me putt which lead to a particular shaft neck angle that was best for me. Then using that shaft angle I putted myself into the putter that worked best for me (Odyssey DW Lab Stroke). My putt average is now in the 1.5-1.8 range. All that to say I think having the correct neck angle for you is very important.
3 months ago
Love the content and testing guys. One little gripe. Can we get more top-down pics of equipment? I never look at the bottom of a putter.
3 months ago
Yes! I was thinking the same thing!
3 months ago
Wilson? Tommy Armour??
3 months ago
I could have sworn the Armour blade was one of the best ones per MGS.
3 months ago
Does the LAB Link1 from several years ago test higher than the newbee’s ?
3 months ago
It seems the winner changes year to year but I’m happy to see the good ol’ Evnroll again show a strong result yet again. From the year(s) it won it has continued to perform well, even if not taking the top spot, further validating it’s stature within the category. I love the story behind the Evnroll face tech and fell in love with that thing after purchasing based on MGS tests. Now I just wonder if it’s worth making the jump to their zero torque version….
3 months ago
The winner looks like a clone of my $99 Kirkland Sinature blade! ( which I love)😎
3 months ago
Sad to say many of these putters immediately get knocked out of the conversation as they do not offer a left-hand option.
3 months ago
As long as you’re putting 4 or 5 pics in of each of the top putters, could you not include 1 pic of a top down view of the top putters in the address position? I’m sure most of your readers would like to see what they would be looking down on as they try to narrow the field down.
3 months ago
I don’t play a blade, but I appreciate the write up, and it’s nice to see some nice putters coming in under $300.
Also…Sausage Golf? Am I reading that correctly?
3 months ago
I only knew about that thing because Rick Shiels had a podcast guest making jokes about holding his sausage a while back.
Jim Clark
2 months ago
Hello Folks, I am an avid reader . Follower of your website and enjoy the articles and test results. I am befuddled by your photos of the “Best Blades of 2026” and failed to include photo from a top view. The view a player sees most often. Please include such photos in your future spreads on putters. Thanks , Jim C.