How Inesis is redefining the consumer experience
News

How Inesis is redefining the consumer experience

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

How Inesis is redefining the consumer experience

Let’s try a thought experiment. For purposes of this exercise, you’re not you.

Instead, you’re a mediocre golfer who knows next to nothing about golf equipment, and you’re looking to purchase a new set of clubs.

If that actually is you, feel free to disregard the previous directive.

The old set of hand-me-downs from your neighbor’s buddy who knew a guy that had an extra set he was about to donate to Goodwill just isn’t cutting any longer. If you’re seriously going to contend at the company scramble this year, it’s time to get (relatively) serious about having a real set of clubs.

Implicit in this search is the idea that, because these clubs are for you, they should fit you to whatever degree that’s possible. That said, a significant obstacle for recreational golfers (which make up roughly 75% of the United States’ 24 million or so players) is that fitting experiences are often costly, time-consuming, and frankly, intimidating for any golfer whose skills aren’t up to par (dad pun). Ideally, you’re looking for several bona fide options that are at least a step above what’s available on Craigslist, but because you aren’t looking to spend a king’s ransom, the major brands and the litany of $500 drivers aren’t in the conversation.

Most often, this leaves the prospective consumer in golf equipment retail purgatory. The most obvious next step is to pop down to the local big-box outlet and begin the futile exercise of wading through massive displays, confusing layouts while attempting to get questions answered by sales associates, some of whom are often more focused on the size of your budget than the dynamics of your swing.

While most equipment manufacturers understand the inherent problem, few are willing to do much about it as it’s fundamentally an ill-fitting demographic. Major OEMs have little, if any, financial interest in catering to the majority of golfers who aren’t willing to pay top-end prices for the latest technology.

There has to be a better solution, and Inesis believes it has the elixir.

BIG BOX REALITIES

Big box stores aren’t designed for efficient or particularly effective consumer experiences.

In this retail jungle, rules are set by the equipment companies which pay for premium floor space to maximize exposure. Theoretically, sales associates are available to help answer questions and point shoppers in the right direction, but it’s like looking at a map of Philadelphia for directions to Central Park.  The DNA of large-scale retail is volume-based sell-through. Sell more. Sell more. Sell more. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat.

This isn’t an indictment (nor is it unique to the golf industry) as much as it is a recognition that the primary avenue by which the majority golfers might attempt to purchase golf equipment is arranged in a manner entirely ill-suited for the purpose.

INESIS

Inesis’ approach runs contrary to what many US consumers have come to expect from a mass-market shopping experience. However, for Decathlon (Inesis is the golf-specific brand of mega-sports retailer Decathlon), accessibility for all is a fundamental way of doing business. As a business entity, Decathlon believes every person should have access to quality products at what it terms “a fair price.”

This philosophy serves as the backbone for each of Decathlon’s 50 in-house brands, and the consumer experience is assessed based on the fidelity of the process, not the final number at the register. Time is a valuable commodity, and based on Decathlon’s success (on pace to surpass $13B in 2019 gross revenue), it understands a simpler, less-convoluted approach attracts and retains value-driven consumers.

GET FIT FOR YOUR GAME WITH TRUEGOLFFIT™

Unbiased. No Guesswork. All Major Brands. Matched To Your Swing. Advanced Golf Analytics matches the perfect clubs to your exact swing using connected data and machine learning.

FREE FITTING

SECRET SAUCE

The key to Inesis (the same could be said for other in-house brands) is while Decathlon remains a massive entity, it allows each brand to feel small. The dedicated golf section is sensibly organized and almost nudges you through a refreshingly simple selection process that has more in common with “Build your vehicle” tools on major automotive websites than an over-stimulating brand-based showcase of OEMs latest and greatest.

Note – that’s a good thing.

It goes a little something like this.

Decision point #1: Ability

Select one of the following:

  1. Beginner (handicap 30+),
  2. Intermediate (handicap 15-30)
  3. Expert (handicap < 15)

If you’re uncertain but have more TVs in your house than rounds of golf played, you’re likely a beginner. If you can’t remember the last time you broke 80, or do a little celebration dance every time you hit a green in regulation, you’re firmly in the intermediate category.

You’ll note the absence of gender or dexterity as criteria. All Inesis clubs are available for both right-handed and left-handed golfers, and while some brands go with the shrink it and pink it tactic, not all females find this approach welcoming, and doing so invariably increases costs and SKU counts, which creates more inventory to manage. Also, because a lot of information for beginning golfers can be filed under don’t know what they don’t know, the Inesis stock 7-piece set (including a 43.5” driver) is designed to take the guesswork out of the equation for beginners.

It might seem like a detail hardly worth mentioning, but a driver that is two inches shorter than the industry standard gives new golfers a better chance to make more consistent contact off the tee.

In a launch monitor battle, golfers will almost certainly swing a 45”-46” driver faster (which can be quite the endorphin rush) but practically speaking, there’s little, if any, evidence to suggest a player who is still trying to figure out whether the 7-iron or 9-iron goes further, will see any on course benefit.

Decision point #2: Length

Measure the distance from your hand to the ground.

Size 1 if the distance is < 78.5 cm

Size 2 if the distance is > 78.5 cm

Done. Move on.

Decision point #3: Flex

With 150 yards to the flag, what club would you use?

  1. 5-iron, hybrid or fairway wood (Slower)
  2. 6/7 iron (Medium)
  3. 8/9/PW (Fast)

Decision Point #4: Grip Size

No decision necessary as grip size is paired with length, so if you’re a Size 1 for length, your grip is also Size 1.

3 ability levels, 2 lengths, 3 flexes, 2 grip sizes. It’s more confusing to try and order off the dollar menu at McDonald’s.

Where playing ability should be the determining factor, Inesis maintains a consistent numbering convention (100/beginner, 500/intermediate, 900/advanced) so consumers can select other items (e.g., golf balls) based on similar criteria.

If this is a one-stop shopping endeavor, Inesis also has a full slate of soft-goods and accessories, all available in the same basic section – and again, all organized within a common-sense framework. Apparel choices are segmented by gender and playing temperature (30°) with each offering a basic, but sufficient slate of colors and patterns. While fewer colors are limiting, Inesis maintains continuity across product lines, which allows consumers to mix and match pieces, creating a maximum number of golf-appropriate ensembles with minimum cost.

I could give a complete rundown going into copious detail on fabric choices, design strategies, material sourcing, and other sundry specifics, but the target customer doesn’t care much about that. All he or she really wants to know is that they’re getting exactly what they expected, if not a little bit more.

Inesis’ approach isn’t the best option for every golfer, but there’s a compelling case that it’s better than most alternatives. For the target golfer, there’s plenty of evidence to suggest an intentionally limited array of choices (part of which helps reduce costs) is more pragmatic and effective than the veritable meat market of mass retail.

No doubt, Inesis serves as a play to the middle of the consumer bell curve, a population that is at best an afterthought for many large OEMs. With that, Inesis isn’t willing to concede that just because it primarily serves the most average golfer, that it’s products can’t compete with industry titans. Inesis will never have the selection or breadth of offerings as TaylorMade, Callaway, or PING, but it chooses its spots carefully. In those categories, there’s reason to believe Inesis can offer consumers as much performance per dollar spent as any major OEM.

Ultimately, consumers make the final determination, and to that end, the unique retail experience Inesis offers both validates and extends the value of the product.

What’s becoming clear is a host of OEMs will be making a play in the opportunity gap – the space between uber-inexpensive box sets and the new norm of $500 drivers and $1500 iron sets.

Where competition exists between similar products, how a consumer feels about the buying experience can be a point of differentiation.

Inesis’ model is distinctive, logical and offers golfers a simplified approach, which just might be why a good swath of golfers will take plenty of notice in 2020.

For You

For You

Drivers
Apr 23, 2024
Forum Member Reviews: Callaway Paradym Drivers
Golf Apparel
Apr 22, 2024
12 Mother’s Day Gift Ideas from adidas
News
Apr 22, 2024
An Inside Look At Custom Simulator Bay Installations With InHome Golf’s James Laidlaw
Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris is a self-diagnosed equipment and golf junkie with a penchant for top-shelf ice cream. When he's not coaching the local high school team, he's probably on the range or trying to keep up with his wife and seven beautiful daughters. Chris is based out of Fort Collins, CO and his neighbors believe long brown boxes are simply part of his porch decor. "Isn't it funny? The truth just sounds different."

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel

Chris Nickel





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Mike

      4 years ago

      I’ve purchased their pants and shopped their website for golf items. The biggest issue I see is their limited selection. In my pant size I had a very hard time finding anything, and in my shoe size they only have 1 color available.
      Looking forward to more of their products being reviewed in this site- but that probably means they’ll be even harder to get.

      The winter pants are very nice btw

      Reply

      Benaud

      4 years ago

      Decathalon Australia obviously missed the memo about being competitively priced, the Tour 900 are $60 AUD a box, I can get a dozen Tour B or Z-Star for $50 so doesn’t really stack up.

      Reply

      Dark Arrow

      4 years ago

      There is so much to say about Decathlon that I could write a book. As a french living in France (homeland of Decathlon) I know this company very well.. As a person working within the golf industry I know their products.

      Decathlon is first and foremost an excellent marketer. If you want cheap prices this is the place. But don’t think you’re gonna get great products. Usually cheap prices come with cheap products. Their force is to make you believe the contrary.

      Decathlon is a private company and let’s be clear: they are in business to make money. Nothing wrong with that but don’t think that for the same price you get more quality than from other brands.

      Reply

      Green Arrow

      4 years ago

      Hi,

      Have you seen the comparaison between their tour 900 ball and the highest quality balls in the parket (Pro V1 for example) ? Because they are almost as good for much les money.
      Their Inesis 500 iron serie is pretty good and cost only 400€, and is not thres times worse than a 1200€ ping serie.

      Their range finder is nearly as good as a Garmin for 3 times less once again…

      And outside gold items, their electrical bikes are really well priced for what the are equipped with.

      We can wonder if the golf equipment industry is not a tiny bit overpricing their products ;-)

      Reply

      Filippo

      3 years ago

      Spot on: inesis’ top of the line in balls and gloves are absolutely good.

      cksurfdude

      4 years ago

      If the Inesis Tour 900 ball .. 4 layer premium @ $30; great performance driver, irons and short game .. is any indication, their other golf equipment is legit!

      Warning, tho – be careful when shopping on their website – you may end up with a *LOT* more in your cart than you initially intended… ;-)

      Reply

      Philippe Simon

      4 years ago

      I’m leaving in Belgium and Decathlon is here since a very long time and it’s very popular. It seems that it’s new for you in USA…

      For every sports, Decathlon is the best value for money you can get ! For sure for apparels, shoes etc….

      For golf equipment, their target is clearly not « pro » and « wanna be looks like a pro ». If your are attached to the social aspect of a »brand » it is not for you;

      Make things easy and affordable with a good (up to very good) level of quality. That’s Decathlon !

      Sorry., English is not my language :-)

      Reply

      Hector

      4 years ago

      CORRECTION! I intended to write that I “have not” yet worn the Inesis Waterproof spikeless golf shoes on the course, and am just wearing them around the house to break them in. Should have used them yesterday. It was a long slog in lots of standing water.

      Reply

      Peter

      4 years ago

      With respect to the comment that up to 50% off heads fly off boxed sets this person has not heard of Tour Edge Golf co. and I do not work at Tour Edge . Great box set and value that will serve most golfers ability !!

      Reply

      Danny

      4 years ago

      Maybe next time state up front there is only one location in the entire United States (San Francisco), so that some hacker like me in Indiana can nope past this particular article?

      Reply

      Craig

      4 years ago

      I was watching the golf channel within the past week and Michael was talking about getting fit for clubs. One of the areas he talked about was shaft characteristics, where the ball starts out low and builds toward an apex then falls. Any time I was fit they were only concerned with swing speed., shaft characteristics was never tested or mentioned, and rarely was spin.

      Reply

      Hector

      4 years ago

      Another quick thought about Inesis: their San Francisco store’s website didn’t list a phone number so I couldn’t contact them to ask questions about their products. Any business wishing to operate in North America needs a phone number for customer service. I complained via email and a customer service agent emailed back and included HIS phone number. That’s great – but they really need to put it on their website. Maybe they just don’t understand North America yet, or the older demographic here as far as golf is concerned.

      Reply

      Hector

      4 years ago

      I was totally unfamiliar with Inesis Decathlon until I heard Harry Nodwell talking about (touting?) their spikeless golf shoes Then I read the Most Wanted reviews re: golf shoes, in which the Inesis Waterproof model was identified as #1 in every attribute other than “looks”, where it was rated #15. I went ahead and bought a pair anyway. I have played them on the course, but they are very comfortable around the house as I break them in. As far as the looks rating, I think Harry overrated them. They are BUTT UGLY! But if they are comfortable and as stable as Harry’s review suggests, I don’t care. My swing can be BUTT UGLY sometimes too. I’m taking them to New Zealand for 10 weeks, where we typically play 35 to 40 rounds. I don’t know the people I golf with there well enough for them to be judgmental about my style choices. Hell, maybe they will think the Inesis shoes are attractive.

      Reply

      Bob

      4 years ago

      I am surprised that you don’t have a Dicks Sporting Goods or Golf Galaxy store near you.

      Reply

      Bob

      4 years ago

      As one of four Certified Fitters at a local Dicks Sporting Goods store I take exception to the thought that the big box stores just push sales, sales, sales. We all fit our customers using info gathered by talking with them, finding out about their game, their desires regarding brands preferred and any physical limitations that they may have that would impact the fitting process. We then begin the fitting process which costs the customers nothing assuming they purchase the club(s). When fitting for grip size, I disagree that the grip size is based on the measurements discussed above. That is not the way to do it. Shaft flex should be determined by checking swing speed not the way they stated it above. So many aspects of their fitting process are just incorrect. Sorry, if that is how they fit people then I would never shop there or recomment them.

      Reply

      Joe Don George

      4 years ago

      Looks like they may have a good thing. I have been playing yonex froged with stiff shafts and my pro wants me to go with senior shafts to keep joints from hurting as i am 71 years old.i have a set made with senior shafts and the swing process is difficult to master,so i was looking for clubs designed for seniors i was looking at x10s but they are too expensive so i may try my luck with this co.

      Reply

      Chris Nickel

      4 years ago

      Bob – My intention isn’t to discount your perspective but the big-box model is all about sell-through and volume. It’s literally the definition of big-box retail. Granted, this article is from 2015, but much of it still rings true – http://mygolfspy.com/an-insiders-look-at-big-box-golf-retail/

      To be clear, the model Inesis uses is what it feels is the best approach for a majority of golfers it services. It purposely limits selection and simplifies decision points to allow for an efficient buying process.

      Far more golfers want to buy clubs the way I buy produce and for that population, I have to think a “less is more” approach is likely better.

      A final point – while there are many theories on fitting, it’s far from a universal practice but most would agree using only swing speed to determine shaft flex is an incomplete analysis but one all too commonly practiced.

      Reply

      Joe Greenberg

      4 years ago

      2 areas of input as a former manager at a big box retailer (Dicks/Golf Galaxy), product designer in the golf sector (clubs, shoes and apparel, and international sports marketer:
      1) visited Decathlon stores in Monaco and Genova, Italy in November. Reaction was negative due to Ikea like maze to navigate separate sports store-within-stores. No
      discernible rationale as to what specialty areas went where. The biggest problem is that there is insufficient advertised or in-store product feature/benefit for all those private label brands (which aren’t cheaper than sale-priced Nikes or adis, which have billions in promotion of their differentiating technologies.
      2) while MGS has done a great job raising the brand quality image of recent Tommy Armour releases, the average Joe buying public has valid concerns over quality of boxed sets. Return rates for defective boxed sets (mostly heads flying off) reached up to 50% at times. Those experiences
      linger, requiring Inesis to have a long-term guarantee or a very long build.
      Agree about the simple approach and not using cliche colorways for gender. Growing the game at the teen level would be a good
      target for Decathlon, especially in Europe where interest in gold is skewing young.

      Reply

      Chris Nickel

      4 years ago

      Joe – I’ve only been to the stores in France and I can say the sheer size was overwhelming at first. However, from there it wasn’t too difficult to understand which brands were located in a particular section. That said, I was primarily interested in the golf areas, so that could have something to do with it as well.

      Regarding boxed sets, it doesn’t surprise me that cheap prices also meant poorly made equipment and I think that’s a challenge for Inesis or anyone looking to make higher quality sets for people who are better off with partial sets. In point of fact, the boxed sets were poor quality not because they were sold in a box, but they were just poorly made.

      Reply

      Jack

      4 years ago

      Their stores are large, but at least due to the easier categorization for each sport, the stuff is fairly easy to find. I’ve never had problems, and you can always ask an associate if you need. I actually haven’t bought anything from there, as I’ve just been there to compare how their stuff stacks up and being a brand ***** I still end up getting name brand stuff.

      THOMAS

      4 years ago

      Get Fit – Get Fit = Time & Cost
      Jump ahead; Use TRUEGOLFFIT = (-time) + (-$$)

      Reply

      Walt Pendleton

      4 years ago

      Most holes are won or lost with the putter. It’s where high fives and golf’s drama exist in the game. However, even thought the average player hits the ball 39 to 42 times with their putter, not one world was asked about golf facilities that sell new putters in this article!. No wonder the average player’s handicaps hasn’t improved in the last 50 years. If we listened to writers we’d all be putting with a Ping Anser or Wilson 8802… God help us from the Fake News…Wow!

      Reply

      Chris

      4 years ago

      Walt, This is simply not true. Strokes gained and golf analytics have shown that the winner in any given week will be at or near the top for approach shots within 10ft. Ball striking is what lowers scores and leads to less putts…

      https://golfweek.com/2018/08/12/by-the-numbers-putt-for-dough-ballstriking-the-most-important-stat-on-tour/

      Reply

      David

      4 years ago

      Chris that article is about tour players. I’m not sure you can apply the same to the average golfer.

      Jack

      4 years ago

      Yeah, you need to have a competant stroke. For amateur levels, you don’t need to be flag hunting all the time, but it’s got to fly fairly straight. Easier said than done, but that’s the truth. Then your short game will make a big difference. One guy can chip it fairly close first try, he’s probably a low 80’s shooter. One guy takes a duff, duff, chip it far from hole, and 3 putt, he’s shooting 100 even with decent ball striking. There’s a lot of variation in between, but it’s something people don’t like practicing but can easily take 10 strokes off if you’re in the latter camp.

      10shot

      4 years ago

      It all comes down to qualified staff. IMO

      Reply

      James

      4 years ago

      I wish I had a big box store to shop in. I’d have to travel 150 miles (Albuquerque, NM) for a decent sporting goods store. Decathalon would be fantastic if it was within driving distance.

      Reply

      Hudson

      4 years ago

      Are you willing to say MGS received no money from Decathalon / Inesis?

      “MyGolfSpy, an independent and unbiased website that has become like a Consumer Reports for golf equipment. Beach started the site to put the golfer first, refusing ad dollars from large retailers”

      Reply

      Chris Nickel

      4 years ago

      Here’s a link you might find helpful – http://mygolfspy.com/advertise/ – In fact, it should probably be required reading for some.

      Reply

      Hudson

      4 years ago

      That’s all well and good but this article doesn’t note that this is part of the small / midsize program.

      Eric

      4 years ago

      “…Decathlon remains a massive entity”

      Does “massive” fit right between ‘small to medium golf company’?

      I (and probably most of the readers) wouldn’t have any issue with MGS taking ad dollars if it was for the incessant, holier-than-thou (and only slightly misleading) “unbiased truth” claims.

      If this wasn’t ~1400 words of unapologetic ad copy some of your readers would feel a bit hoodwinked.

      Love/d the site for years, but think you guys could do a bit better.

      OMFS88

      4 years ago

      You do not identify which articles are ad’s? That is absolutely not above board and definitely means I have to take what I’m reading here with a grain of salt.

      Chris Nickel

      4 years ago

      You’re barking up a tree with no branches.

      All of this information is on our advertising page, but to be clear:

      1) MyGolfSpy accepts $0 advertising dollars from any of the major golf manufacturers (e.g. TaylorMade, PING, Titleist, Callaway)

      2) MyGolfSpy does, however, allow small and medium-sized golf companies that maintain a proven track record of performance to advertise.

      We believe it’s valuable to both the golfer and the company to have a more level playing field and our purpose is to put the best performing products in front of consumers as often as we possibly can, regardless of how recognizable the name of the brand may/may not be.

      Any insinuation that our practices are biased fails to acknowledge that the only real currency we have is the trust our readers place in us. We can always replace advertisers. The same can’t be said for the trust of our readership. It’s foundational to everything we do.

      I get that it’s a counterintuitive approach given how many media outlets operate, but if you believe we’d allow dollars to dictate coverage, then it’s clear you really don’t get what we do –

      OMFS88

      4 years ago

      Then why not add a line at the top of the article saying “this is an article written about a company who pays us money”? I am in no position to accuse you of biased coverage but I am comfortable saying that not disclosing a relationship casts doubt when, and I am quoting here, “While that isn’t to say any company has intentionally deceived its consumers, the uniqueness of the industry has allowed for claims that can’t be refuted, products that may be of dubious quality, and skyrocketing prices with profit margins going through the roof.

      Adam Beach, the founder of MyGolfSpy.com, recognized these faults within the industry and its products and knew consumers were unaware of what they were buying compared to what they thought they were buying.”

      If transparency is the whole goal…

      Hudson

      4 years ago

      Chris your below responses to OMFS88 are weak at best

      You noted “Any insinuation that our practices are biased fails to acknowledge that the only real currency we have is the trust our readers place in us.” – That statement makes 0 sense, logically it equates to you can’t question our motives because if you did than our readers would wait for it…..question your motives

      Your other point that “We believe it’s valuable to both the golfer and the company to have a more level playing field and our purpose is to put the best performing products in front of consumers as often as we possibly can” can easily have holes poked in it. By the above quote why wouldn’t you write articles about Decathalon / Inesis because of their best performing products – instead of waiting until they paid the advertising fee. The so called level playing field only appears level to your readers but in reality large brands get free run on your website (makes sense because that’s what readers want) while small brands have an entry free

      The largest issue that isn’t even part of this article is the use of Snell in your testimonials for your advertising. It does beg the question of biasness in the ball testing. I am not saying that your results were influenced by prior payment but the goal to work with small and medium manufacturers can be seen as a possible driver for bumping them up (also have a banner ad for Snell at the bottom of this page as I type).

      None of the above statements are meant to imply you have direct biases but as you stated you are in the trust business and with this comes the need to prevent even an appearance of bias.

      OMFS88 makes a very good point – most of this could be handled with a simple disclaimer on any article or review that is from this small / midsize advertiser pool.

      Chris Nickel

      4 years ago

      Hudson –

      We always welcome constructive criticism and your suggestions around more clear declaration of which brands advertise with us is something we’ll certainly wrestle with.

      With that, I do want to reiterate several points:

      * Our testing processes and protocols are 100% unbiased. We have an open-door policy where the public is welcome to see how we operate. We have a special “Doubting Thomas” entrance for certain guests.

      That’s a joke. We actually don’t but individuals and OEMs all seem to have a different level of appreciation for just how thorough and refined our processes are seeing them first-hand.

      * Performance is determined by data. – a lot of data. In fact, there’s so much data, the notion of “bumping” a brand for any reason is just silly and mathematically not feasible.

      * Brands are selected/eligible to advertise AFTER performance has been established, not before.

      * We only have so much bandwidth and space to dedicate to content coverage. We do the best job we can of covering what we believe are the highest-value topics/equipment stories for consumers.

      *Managing perception is a huge challenge. Some people see a banner ad and use that to tell themselves a story around preferential treatment in a ball test, performed by a robot, with thousands of data points. Others, think that every time we portray any product in a positive light, there’s some external reason we’re doing so..

      Others seem to understand that our entire platform is built on the trust we’ve established with our readers and we’d never risk the very foundation of what we do for some advertising dollars.

      I know there’s a tendency for people to introduce shades of gray in situations that are simply black and white, particularly when they feel there’s an absence of information. If you have specific questions or what to discuss this further, shoot me an email.

      Bowser

      4 years ago

      There is a new one of these stores now in Ottawa and that makes 4 or 5 in Canada. I’ve actually check them out and they have some attractive items such as shoes and gloves. I did try their ball offering (the soft version) and while it wasn’t a bad ball I just wasn’t the biggest fan of how it felt off my putter. That being said at their price points I do now have a couple of buddies gaming their ball. Not sure about their clubs as there wasn’t a place to hit one and get a feel for them. And frankly they didn’t appeal to me as I need a full set and play a full set.

      They will make a significant dent in their target demographics as they make it simple and easy to understand for the beginner who might be intimidated by the ‘golf store’ . I can remember the first time I walked into a golf store some 30 yrs ago…. wish this had been an option.

      Reply

      Davemac

      4 years ago

      Interesting Article, here in the UK there has been a growth in the pre owned market. Stores now have facilities to try before you buy and offer full credit if the club is returned within 14 days (effectively on course testing).

      Just to point out a technical issue in the article: I read the piece using Safari in Reader Mode. and your own advert for True Fit was presented as ‘the hyperlink see my results’ which I naturally thought was a link to your fitting results from following the Inesis fitting process.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Drivers
    Apr 23, 2024
    Forum Member Reviews: Callaway Paradym Drivers
    Golf Apparel
    Apr 22, 2024
    12 Mother’s Day Gift Ideas from adidas
    News
    Apr 22, 2024
    An Inside Look At Custom Simulator Bay Installations With InHome Golf’s James Laidlaw
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.