EDEL SMS IRONS TEST
Irons

EDEL SMS IRONS TEST

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

EDEL SMS IRONS TEST

OUR JOB IS YOUR GAME

With Most Wanted Testing officially over, our “off season” fills up with lab opportunities. It’s a chance to focus on technologies (and related claims) more closely. Hence, conducting an Edel SMS Irons Test.

In July, Edel launched SMS Irons featuring the Swing Match weighting system. The point of technical differentiation is that each iron offers movable weights with each head. The release of the Edel SMS irons brought with it some bold, eyebrow-raising claims.

We put those claims to the test. Today, we dive into the results and do an Edel iron review.

Swing Match System

EDEL SMS IRON TEST

Per usual, data was collected using Foresight GCQuad Launch monitors. To minimize variables, all testers hit Titleist Pro V1 golf balls.

For this test, 25 testers hit shots using 7-irons. Four conditions were tested: SMS neutral (center), SMS heel, SMS toe and the testers’ gamers.

The uniqueness of the Edel SMS irons is the movable weight system. The system includes three weights: one eight grams and two two-grams. For each 7-iron condition, the eight-gram weight was positioned in a certain location (neutral, heel or toe).

best irons for accuracy

EDEL SMS IRON ASSERTIONS

Marketing plays an enormous role in nearly every product release. With the SMS irons, Edel made some bold statements:

  • Faster ball speeds. An average ball speed increase of 3.30 mph
  • Longer distance. An average carry distance increase of 5.60 yards
  • More accuracy. 1.30 yards closer to the centerline of average

TEST RESULTS

For this test, we looked at the individual results for each of our testers. We wanted to see how each weight position performed for each of the golfers as well as how the performance of the Edel SMS compared to their gamers.

Here’s what we found.

Overall Averages

First, let’s cover the Raw Averages observed from the 25 testers in testing the SMS irons versus the player’s original gamer.

  • Ball Speed: 1.18 mph was lost when using the SMS irons versus the player’s gamer.
  • Accuracy: Players experienced a 2.15-yard “closer to centerline” result utilizing the Edel versus their club.
  • Carry Distance: 2.05 yards were lost while testing the Edel SMS iron in comparison to their gamer.

Ball Speed

The results suggest some golfers may benefit from SMS irons but ball speed gains of 3.30 mph are unlikely.

  • Only 36 percent of the 25 testers experienced ball speed increases with the Edel SMS irons, with an average of 1.52 mph.
  • 64 percent succeeded with their gamer versus the SMS irons with an average of 1.44 mph higher.

Note* The SMS irons were adjusted for the best-performing weight location for each tester.

Carry Distance

Throuhgout observation and data collection, we did notice a respectable gain in Carry Distance. Not quite 5.60 yards – but something to be noted.

  • Sixty-eight percent of our testers produced longer carry distance with their gamer.
  • On average, these testers were 2.74 yards longer than the best-performing SMS iron weight position.
  • However, for the eight testers who gained distance with the SMS irons, the average distance gain was 4.31 yards.

Accuracy

Even in the iron category, distance sells. Often, accuracy is overlooked in pursuit of a few extra yards. Our results suggest accuracy is where Edel’s SMS irons shine.

  • Edel says golfers were 1.3 yards closer to the centerline on average.
  • Seventy-six percent of the testers had a “closer to centerline” result with a SMS iron.
  • On average, those 19 testers were 3.56 yards closer to the centerline versus their own 7-iron. It’s an intriguing result that could speak to the benefit of movable weights.

Edel Irons Review

KEY TAKEAWAYS

1. BALL SPEED PROMISES

Year after year, products are released with the promise of ball speed gains. Will certain individuals see some ball speed gains? As with most everything we test, the data suggests some golfers will see gains over what’s in their bag, However, they likely won’t reach 3.3 mph.

2. CARRY DISTANCE IS A WILD CARD

Although most testers didn’t see carry improvements with the Edel SMS iron, the eight that did saw an average increase of 4.31 yards over their current 7-iron. While not every golfer saw distance increases, those who did saw significant gains.

3. TIGHTER DISPERSION

Where the Edel SMS irons shone in testing was with accuracy. Considering we’re talking about an iron, that’s a good indicator of the potential to shoot lower scores.

Seventy-six percent of the testers were closer to the centerline on average. That’s a testament to the tighter dispersion Edel SMS iron can deliver.

BOTTOMLINE

Edel SMS Irons ReviewFrom our vantage point, the Edel misses the mark on some of its claims around the SMS irons.

Ball speed gains of 3.30 mph appear largely unattainable. Our results suggest that roughly a third of golfers will see improvement and gains will likely be below 1.5 mph.

Where Edel hits the mark is with accuracy. With the movable weights, 76 percent of the testing pool improved their dispersion with the Edel SMS irons versus their current irons.

If you’re in the market for a set of irons, the Edel SMS iron is an intriguing option. Are some of their claims bold? Absolutely. The swing match system is unique in the marketplace and the claims certainly help to call attention to it.

Distance claims may not live up to the billing (chasing distance will often do more harm than good, anyway) but if accuracy is your goal, Edel SMS irons are definitely worth a look. After all, if you want to shoot lower scores, tighter dispersion is a step in the right direction. Literally.

For You

For You

Golf Wedges
Apr 16, 2024
Vokey WedgeWorks Low Bounce K Grind Wedge
News
Apr 16, 2024
It Was A Masters To Forget For LIV Golf
Golf Apparel
Apr 16, 2024
adidas Pioneers Next Generation of Lightweight Golf Garments
Phillip Bishop

Phillip Bishop

Phillip Bishop

Cancer Survivor. Amputee Golfer. Essentially, a OneLeggedBoss. When he isn't facilitating testing or analyzing data, Phillip enjoys his family time, practicing and playing golf, unwinding with video games, capturing photos of nature, or devouring pretzels.

Phillip Bishop

Phillip Bishop

Phillip Bishop

Phillip Bishop

Phillip Bishop

Phillip Bishop

Driver Titleist TSR3 3 Wood Titleist TSR3
Driving Iron Titleist U505 Irons (5-6) Titleist T200
Irons (7-PW) Titleist T150 Wedges (50, 56, 60) Titleist Vokey SM10
Putter L.A.B. Mezz.1 Max Ball Titleist Pro V1x
Phillip Bishop

Phillip Bishop

Phillip Bishop





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Bryan

      12 months ago

      This is the least detailed test Ive seen to date. Which model was tested. There is a players club forged not hollow, a players distance (hollow), and a game improvement and all have different lofts. What types of clubs and lofts were they compared to? Seems like a lot of wiggle room.

      Reply

      RJ

      12 months ago

      👍

      Reply

      Sellemental

      2 years ago

      Thanks for another great review from MGS ! So glad we have you to give us real info.
      Love reading the comments almost as much as the article, and as expected, numerous comments related to loft jacking. I get it, but it gets a little tiresome at times. Too often it comes cross as over critical for a team trying to look out for all of us golf nerds out here.
      If your “test driving” different products, whatever it might be, there are always going to be differences. I may be oversimplifying, but isn’t the concept of the moveable weights to shift the sweet spot to benefit the player, and couldn’t that benefit negate the loft difference?? Better contact equals better shots/ results, right?
      Keep up the great work MGS !!

      Reply

      WBN

      2 years ago

      Thanks for another honest review. Too many website reviews are a carbon copy of the manufacturers advertising and claims. Keep up the good work.

      Reply

      MyGolfSpy

      2 years ago

      ????

      Reply

      sam

      2 years ago

      I would have rather seen a swing off with 3 other (top 4 brands) brands, in the same category, carrying same set up, Loft and shaft, Since Edel are new, as are the 4 other brands, all calming more speed ,distance and accuracy.

      Reply

      Ray

      2 years ago

      Seems like they are at a disadvantage with the weaker loft. Wonder what the results would be if the lofts are equal? Looks like their club might win if lofts are equal

      Reply

      TLGFLA

      2 years ago

      We’re the Edel clubs fitted with the same shaft, shaft length, lie, loft, etc as the gamer? If not, what is the value of this test? I would expect there to be differences across any clubs you compare, especially when not normalized for comparison.

      Reply

      Emery

      2 years ago

      Edel 7 iron is 32* which is the same for my strong FtWort 15’s.

      Reply

      greg p

      2 years ago

      Seems like accuracy would be a much more marketable benefit. I’d buy based upon that.

      Reply

      Bob

      2 years ago

      Edel 7 iron is 32 degrees. (Edel’s website)
      Would like see results on same loft gamer irons?

      Reply

      don

      2 years ago

      Agree wholeheartedly, forget the number stamped on the bottom, test apples to apples.

      Reply

      Golfinnut

      2 years ago

      Irons are all about accuracy anyway, not distance. So it may be worth while for some to check these out. Me … notta chance.

      Reply

      Steve S

      2 years ago

      The Edel website lists the 7 iron at 32 degrees which is at least 2 degrees weaker than “modern” irons and 5 degrees weaker than Wilson D9 irons.(27 degrees). Basically Wilson’s 7 is what 10 years ago was a 5 iron.

      Reply

      Ace

      2 years ago

      Hi Philip,
      Another fantastic piece .

      Regards,

      Ace O’Hae

      Reply

      Chappy8

      2 years ago

      Seems like comparing to gamer 7 iron is going to give you some funky results if loft is different. Looking at specs, the Edsel 7 iron is 32 degrees which is closer to my T300 8 iron than my 7 iron.

      Reply

      Phillip Bishop

      2 years ago

      Correct, which is why we made the effort to only use testers who game “players distance” style irons.

      Reply

      bob

      2 years ago

      What is the loft of the Edel 7 iron? If the ‘gamer’ 7 iron is 31 degrees and the Edel is 34 degrees then, yeah, gonna be tough to bet that yardage. This is some very basic info that needs to be included in the article.

      Reply

      Phillip Bishop

      2 years ago

      Edel SMS 7-Iron is 32° based on their product specs and falls into a “Player’s Distance” style iron. We purposefully utilized testers who game similar style irons.

      Reply

      tscdave

      2 years ago

      But they are pretty!

      Reply

      Phillip Bishop

      2 years ago

      Our testing pool did speak highly of the aesthetics and feel of the iron. Hoping to include them in 2023 Most Wanted Testing.

      Reply

      George

      2 years ago

      What shafts and stiffness were used versus the shafts in your test pool’s own irons.? Hopefully at least the same stiffness could be used. Also, how did the swingweights compare?

      Reply

      Phillip Bishop

      2 years ago

      Edel provided us with a plethora of stock options, which featured various weights. From there, we fit players accordingly and/or set them up as closely to their current gamer from a shaft spec standpoint.

      Reply

      James

      2 years ago

      I mean who cares about the speed/carry vs whatever irons people were using but 4 feet closer on a putt seems significant.

      Reply

      Peter Trivanovich

      2 years ago

      Too often I see these kinds of “tests” that appear too be controlled for variables but are not. Lofts vary from manufacturer to manufacturer. It seems to me that if the testing were to be accurate you would need to ensure that the lofts matched up, not the number on the sole, which I’m guessing is how this was done?

      Reply

      Chris Nickel

      2 years ago

      Peter – you also need to consider the environment in which a golfer will actually test/purchase the product. . It’s one thing to consider controlling every variable possible – but that’s not generally how golfers test/buy equipment.

      Think about a typical scenario where a golfer shows up to a demo/day or fitting. Is the fitter going to bend irons so that they can match static loft? Exceedingly unlikely. Moreover, static loft doesn’t tell you much of anything…it’s dynamic loft that ultimately matters and then you still have to consider the geometry and mass properties of the club itself –

      Reply

      David V

      2 years ago

      Yeah, I get that. However, it would still be nice to see the data. I have some forged, solid, traditionally lofted blade/cavity back irons and a set of hollow-body, goo-filled, “modern” lofted irons. The “modern” 8i is almost identically spec’d (length, loft, lie) like the old-school 7i. Unsurprisingly, for me, they hit the ball just as far as each other. So, I treat them as equal regardless of the number stamped on the bottom. Basically, the modern, composite, aggressively lofted set plays a club longer. When I do a demo, based on loft as opposed to the stamped number on the club, I’ll compare clubs that I believe should carry a certain distance. In fact, if the clubs are excessively long, that messes up my gapping and then I need to fix the rest of my bag… which just makes the new set of irons more expensive.

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Wedges
    Apr 16, 2024
    Vokey WedgeWorks Low Bounce K Grind Wedge
    News
    Apr 16, 2024
    It Was A Masters To Forget For LIV Golf
    Golf Apparel
    Apr 16, 2024
    adidas Pioneers Next Generation of Lightweight Golf Garments
    ENTER to WIN 3 DOZEN

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

    Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls
    By signing up you agree to receive communications from MyGolfSpy and select partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy You may opt out of email messages/withdraw consent at any time.