Updated: 2016 Driver Center of Gravity Locations
Drivers

Updated: 2016 Driver Center of Gravity Locations

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Updated: 2016 Driver Center of Gravity Locations

When we published our 2016 Driver CG chart in late March, there were some omissions. Several of you commented (and emailed) to ask about some of the clubs we left off of the initial chart.

What about, this, that, and the others?

No worries, guys, we’ve got you covered. Today we’re publishing a revision to our 2016 Center of Gravity Charts. We’ve updated the data to include the following drivers:

2016cg

For those of you who are stumbling across our CG charts for the first time, and may be wondering what they are, and why they matter, I would encourage you to check out any and all of our previous posts on the topic.

For the rest of you, let’s get to the new info:

CG Relative to Face Center

The chart below shows the YZ (top to bottom and front to back) CG location relative to the center of the face for the 23 drivers measured. Effectively, the area shown represents that 14mm x 12mm box we mentioned in the fine print section. These measurements depict CG locations without consideration for their relationship to the neutral axis. As such they are not loft dependent. Basically, the chart shows the actual CG location for each driver measured. In addition to the Manufacturer and Model filters:

  • You can click on any model name at the top of the chart to isolate that club
  • Hold down Ctrl while clicking to isolate multiple clubs
  • Hovering over any dot will reveal additional information including the relevant movable weight setting and the actual measurements in millimeters

For even more information, including comparative data from 2015 drivers, check out the Advanced Data Page.

Observations

  • As expected based on the continuation of the cavity design, Nike’s offerings remain among the highest CG drivers on the market. Of the new for 2016 additions, only Bombtech’s Grenade has a higher CG placement. This would suggest a set of drivers best suited for golfers who contact the ball with the upper third of the driver face.
  • Without regard for proximity to the neutral axis, we would classify Nike’s offerings as mid-forward.
  • Wilson’s FG Tour F5 is also a mid-forward design (relative to face center), and plus or minus a few 10ths of a millimeter could easy be mistaken for one of the settings within the M1’s range.
  • Callaway’s XR16 Sub Zero is rewriting the definition of forward CG (again, relative to face center). With the heavier of the two weights in the forward position, I believe it offers the most forward CG of any driver we’ve ever put on our charts. While the absolute CG is not as low as some others, it unquestionably qualifies as a low CG head.

CG Relative to the NEUTRAL AXIS

Here’s our 2016 CGNA & MOI Chart. Same filter rules apply. (Note that because both the data and the scale is fundamentally different, this chart cannot be directly compared to the Front to Back chart above.)

For an explanation of the Neutral Axis and why it matters, check out our primer on Center of Gravity.

For even more information, including comparative data from 2015 drivers, check out the Advanced Data Page.

Observations

  • While Nike has shifted its driver CGs closer to the neutral axis, MOI is slightly lower across all three models for 2016 (compared to 2015).
  • Surprisingly, while all 3 models offer similar MOI, the Vapor Flex 440 (weight back) is slightly more forgiving (based on MOI measurement) than the other two.
  • With regard for the neutral axis, Wilson’s FG Tour F5 again sits squarely in the middle of the M1’s range – though the F5’s CG is slightly higher than M1 in all but the rear-most weight configurations.
  • Callaway’s XR16 Sub Zero fits exactly where we expected it would (and admittedly where I hoped it would). Positioned in the middle ground of sorts between the M1 430 and Cobra’s F6+, the CG is, in fact, Sub Zero (relative to the neutral axis). From a truth in marketing standpoint, Sub Zero is exactly what the company had suggested it is.

As you might expect, we have also updated our Advanced Data Page. There you will find

  • Bigger charts
  • 2015 & 2016 Driver models
  • Measured vs. Stamped Loft, along with head weights
  • Left/Right CG (Draw/Fade Bias)
  • What If?…The normalized CG chart

For those of you who are interested in digging deeper and seeing more drivers, and more data, the Advanced CG Charts should not be missed.

For You

For You

2021 Tommy Armour Impact No. 2 Putter 2021 Tommy Armour Impact No. 2 Putter
Blade Putters
Jul 17, 2024
This Blade Putter is Under $100
News
Jul 17, 2024
Forum Member Review of Stix Golf Sets
Prime Day 2024 Prime Day 2024
Buyer's Guide
Jul 17, 2024
Amazon Prime Day Golf Deals 2024
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Rich

      7 years ago

      You show nothing on the Wilson Triton ?

      Reply

      Tt

      8 years ago

      Where are the 915s?????

      Reply

      ryebread

      8 years ago

      I’d really like to see the CG placement of the Srixon drivers on the charts. They’re large sellers in Japan and are trying to make a push into the US market. The z355 offers a compelling story that would seemingly be high on MOI.

      I’d also like to see some “oldies but goodies” — drivers that were previously very good performers for MGS. I’d suggest things like the XHot, G25, Anser and that Adams LS that was seemingly the “control” driver for a number of years.

      Reply

      CLAY

      8 years ago

      I do not see the head weight or measures loft of the sub zero or any of the nike models, am I missing it or was this data not updated?

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      8 years ago

      The dashboards were misbehaving (hiding some things by default). I’ve updated them. You should be able to see the info for the recent additions.

      Reply

      Brian Jay Murra

      8 years ago

      The Nike VFP out did my G30 LST by 7 yards. Don’t know how or why, just did. Flys lower, carries the same, rolls out further. Ball speed is 4mph higher.

      Reply

      GilB

      8 years ago

      Amazing stuff. Keep us golf geeks informed GolfSpy. Thank you.

      Reply

      Rob

      8 years ago

      I just received a Sub Zero from Callaway to test and have been comparing it to my M1 430. I’m very pleased to see that the COG information matches what I’ve been finding in my testing. This type of info feeds my golf data geek side so much. Keep up the awesome stuff MGS!

      Reply

      Teaj

      8 years ago

      No wonder I spun the crap out of the Grenade

      Reply

      Rob

      8 years ago

      Me too!

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    2021 Tommy Armour Impact No. 2 Putter 2021 Tommy Armour Impact No. 2 Putter
    Blade Putters
    Jul 17, 2024
    This Blade Putter is Under $100
    News
    Jul 17, 2024
    Forum Member Review of Stix Golf Sets
    Prime Day 2024 Prime Day 2024
    Buyer's Guide
    Jul 17, 2024
    Amazon Prime Day Golf Deals 2024