adidas Shopping TaylorMade Golf
News

adidas Shopping TaylorMade Golf

adidas Shopping TaylorMade Golf

Story Highlights:

  • adidas has already entertained bids for TaylorMade Golf
  • adidas Group CEO’s statements suggest that a sale is being considered
  • Any sale would not include adidas Golf (apparel and footwear division)

Is TaylorMade actually for sale? It sure looks that way.

The information from a highly-credible source is that, in early February, adidas entertained an initial round of bidding for TaylorMade Golf.

Six bids were received, five of them from private equity firms, the sixth from a competitor, specifically Bridgestone.

While my source asked that I not share the specifics of the offers, the details provided suggest that adidas and TaylorMade’s suitors are currently somewhere in the ballpark of 150 Million apart.

Sufficed to say a deal is not imminent, however, the latest information I have is that a second round of bids is due soon, and for those interested in the potential for a mega-merger, bad news; Bridgestone is now believed to be out of the running.

No Comment

I reached out to both TaylorMade and Bridgestone asking for comment. Bridgestone politely declined. Emails and text messages to TaylorMade were not returned.

Financial Reports Yield Clues

What I’m being told about a potential sale is particularly interesting in light of the recent financial information released by adidas Group last week; including both its 2015 Annual Report, and its Q4 2015 Earnings Call.

We don’t need to rehash the specifics here. We’ve already published details from the annual report, and other than a 15% year over year decline in Q4, from a numbers perspective, there’s nothing new of particular note from the earnings call.

There are, however, several hints – some more overt than others – that reaffirm the notion that adidas is, in fact, giving serious consideration to divesting itself of TaylorMade. It has also been made abundantly clear that adidas Golf (the apparel and footwear division) would not be included in any sale.

adidas Golf stays with adidas. This is not open for discussion.

A Closer Look at TaylorMade’s potential future

As you may recall from the annual report adidas Group CEO Herbert Hainer said this about the golf division:

“Another important strategic decision will be made shortly. Following a decade of strong and profitable growth, TaylorMade-adidas Golf experienced two very difficult years in 2014 and 2015, caused by a number of structural, commercial and operational issues. As a result, halfway through last year we started analyzing future options for our golf business. This strategic review is expected to be concluded by the end of the first quarter of 2016.” – Herbert Hainer, CEO, adidas Group

There’s more about the restricting program, but the parts relevant to today’s discussion are all here; specifically, the strategic decision (to sell or not to sell), and that part about adidas analyzing future options (also to sell or not to sell).

Those who believe adidas wouldn’t consider selling TaylorMade would likely remind us that, in addition to TaylorMade, adidas’ golf division also includes adidas Golf, Ashworth, and Adams. Maybe it’s only those last two that are on the table?

Straight to the point, adidas Golf isn’t going anywhere. As you’ll see below, that’s been stated publicly in no uncertain terms. adidas Golf actually makes money. Adams and Ashworth will be sold or buried. With Adams there’s no intellectual property, no market share, and short of anything that might be collecting dust in a warehouse somewhere, no product either. What’s the value of a name, a logo, and not much else?

It’s true that Hainer’s statement is vague, which is why I suppose you could argue that any discussion of a sale might not include TaylorMade.

Fortunately for those seeking a bit more clarity, adidas also completed it’s 2015 Q4 earnings call, and while Mr. Hainer stops short of saying “Yes, we are shopping TaylorMade”, in the Q&A portion of the call, it’s made abundantly clear that the option to sell is very much on the table.

During that Q&A session, there were several questions that specifically touched on TaylorMade (suggesting it’s very much on the minds of adidas investors). Three of those, in particular, yielded some genuine insight into whether or not adidas is giving serious consideration to divesting itself of TaylorMade.

As the questions and answers were often multi-part, I have truncated both to isolate only those portions directly related to the golf division. Context has not been altered. Here are those exchanges:

Q: The first question with regards to TaylorMade-adidas Golf, I appreciate that the review is ongoing and will be finalized over the first quarter. But, is there any clarification that you can give today that, effectively, you’ll be reviewing just the TaylorMade part of TaylorMade-adidas Golf and that the adidas Golf element will effectively stay within the adidas brand?

A: We definitely will not talk and discuss about the adidas-Golf brand because this would mean we separate the adidas brand and this would definitely not be a wise decision, no. If we talk, then it is only TaylorMade and obviously Adams and Ashworth.

Q: And one last one on just understanding when you – in your annual report, you talk about TaylorMade-adidas Golf as a multi-brand category. But, would it be possible still to keep the TaylorMade hardware and then, obviously, the adidas products and just separate Ashworth and Adams Golf so that it’s not anymore a real multi-brand, but just a concentrated single-brand category?

A: Yes of course, everything is possible. This is why we exactly do the structural reviewing, the strategic review that we know at the end of the quarter what exactly we want to do with Golf business. The only thing which is a testament is that the adidas Golf will stay within the adidas Group, everything else will be analyzed.

Q: Just to be sure, you mentioned Golf as a potential gross margin driver in 2016 as to the restructuring. Is Golf in your gross margin assumptions of 47.3%, 47.8% for the Group, how should we understand Golf in this guidance?

A: Your third question was about golf and the margin, but let me make clear for the whole profitability process. Obviously our assumption at the moment is it includes the TaylorMade and the numbers that we have guided too. And we expect the TaylorMade and adidas Golf businesses to grow in 2016 and we expect them also to be profitable in 2016 and we still have some restructuring ahead for us for TaylorMade in 2016 of low double digit number that may lead to a loss in the segment, but definitely the underlying business TaylorMade and adidas Golf will be profitable in ‘16.

Will TaylorMade Be Sold?

So what’s the takeaway? Will TaylorMade be sold?

This is where forecasting gets a bit trickier. How much is TaylorMade worth without adidas Golf (and its apparel and footwear)? Thus far there appears to be disagreement to the tune of around 150 Million.

I won’t pretend to have any concrete answers; I can only share with you what those I’ve spoken with view as the two critical factors that impact the potential for any sale.

The success of M in the marketplace. It seems almost crazy to believe the value – and by extension the potential sale – of what was not long ago a billion-dollar company could be tied to a single product family, but the prevailing wisdom is that if M proves to be the success TaylorMade believes it will be, it might be enough for TaylorMade to gain some actual momentum, and to push the perceived value of the company closer to what adidas would like to get for it.

Here’s the rub. Private equity firms like to buy low, reinvigorate, and sell high. If the actual value of TaylorMade increases measurably, it could limit the upside for anyone buying the company as a mid to long-term investment. The theory goes that a successful and ultimately more valuable TaylorMade actually reduces the likelihood of a sale, or at least a sale to a Private Equity firm.

Herbert Hainer is due to step down as adidas CEO at the end of September. Hainer has said that a decision on TaylorMade will be made by the end of Q1…effectively the end of this month. Even if the decision is to hold on to TaylorMade, it may not be final.

Multiple insiders I’ve spoken with have suggested that Hainer may be sentimentally invested in TaylorMade. He, along with former CEO Mark King, oversaw its growth into a force the likes of which the golf equipment industry will ever see again. After that success, selling low likely wouldn’t sit well. Shareholder pressure would likely need to be immense before he’d be on-board with selling below market value.

Hainer’s replacement, Kasper Rorsted, has no such attachment to TaylorMade. If by the end of Q3 the numbers still suggest that unloading TaylorMade would be in the best financial interest of The adidas Group, there’d likely be fewer reservations about selling.

If what I’m hearing is accurate (and I believe that it is), it suggests that TaylorMade, to an extent, may actually control its own destiny. That is to say that if you buy its products, and help it increase profitability, adidas might be content to let it ride.

The industry insiders and experts I’ve spoken with, however, believe it’s unlikely (though definitely not impossible) that TaylorMade will right the ship in time to stave off a sale. Year over year metalwoods share (January) is stagnant, iron share has declined, and competitors have new product on the shelf. As spring arrives in cold weather climates and green grass shops open for business; if the trends hold, Titleist and PING will likely increase their market share, some of that at TaylorMade’s expense.

None of this speaks to an environment entirely conducive to growth for TaylorMade.

While we can’t say a sale will definitely happen, adidas has opened the lot and shoppers are actively kicking TaylorMade’s tires. Where that leads…

Expect an interesting next few months for TaylorMade-adidas Golf.

For You

For You

Golf Shoes
May 16, 2024
Pour One Out for NIKE’s Air Zoom Infinity Tour NRG
Golf Technology
May 16, 2024
18 Luxury Golf Gifts We’re Drooling Over
News
May 16, 2024
10 Best Florida Golf Courses You Can Get On
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Bill Tetley

      8 years ago

      Hopefully a larger golf company doesn’t buy them and then shut down their facility in a few years. That would really suck.

      Reply

      Dave S

      8 years ago

      Under Armour.

      Reply

      Tony Covey

      8 years ago

      UA comes up literally every time something in the equipment industry might be for sale. This time around, it’s highly unlikely. adidas isn’t likely to sell to its closest competitor in the US Sporting goods/apparel market.

      Reply

      Hubert

      8 years ago

      If any of you out there need any spare parts for any of your Taylormade irons, just let me know. I have so many different inserts, plastic labels and stickers, slot fillers and other bits and pieces of plastic shapes and things that I’ve picked up off the fairways at my local course, I would have opened up something akin to an auto salvage yard by now if I could just come up with a good name for the business.

      Anyone out there got any ideas?

      Reply

      Pete the Pro

      8 years ago

      Yes, call it e-bay. Where I work we retail all TM clubs, and have done for several years. Decent volume of sales. Broken TM clubs in 9 years – about 12. Sold thousands. Shaft breakages are rare under normal use. Inserts – yes, I had 1 toe insert break on the RSi1. Zero plastic labels, stickers, etc.

      Reply

      Jordan L. Hill

      8 years ago

      I’m pulling for Taylormade! I hope they make it and that adidas decides to save them. Hang in there TM!

      Reply

      Monica Wilson

      8 years ago

      Wow

      Reply

      Chad Cuccaro

      8 years ago

      That might explain why my monthly invoice had taylormade/oracle on it! Why would Oracle be getting into golf

      Reply

      Ryan Finch

      8 years ago

      Hopefully for the better

      Reply

      Conner Cornett

      8 years ago

      Their last 5 drivers, fairway woods, and hybrids have been absolute garbage. The last marketable driver they produced was the Rocketballz. They even messed it up the following year. I’m a Taylor Made man. Not anymore. The irons have remained solid.

      Reply

      Pete the Pro

      8 years ago

      I do read some funny things here, from the bizaare to the ridiculous, from mad, mad, mad through to even madder. I like it though, it’s entertaining for me. Anyway, to suggest the recent TM drivers, FW’s and Rescues are garbage is definitely up there. Gave me a good laugh though.

      Reply

      David RD Wozny

      8 years ago

      Surprised Under Armour isn’t considering them for a hardware division.

      Reply

      David W

      8 years ago

      I was thinking the same thing.

      Reply

      Travis Hartman

      8 years ago

      Might as well, how hard can it be?

      Reply

      Nicholas Martinez

      8 years ago

      Interesting read!

      Reply

      Michael Kovary

      8 years ago

      Hey maybe Nike could get some quality products now

      Reply

      Mark Roberts

      8 years ago

      How can the number 1 driver company on tour be broken so bad no one wants them

      Reply

      John Anthony Eubanks

      8 years ago

      Easy to be the number 1 driver on tour when you pay people to swing them.

      Reply

      David W

      8 years ago

      You beat me to it. I know everyone’s swings are different, but I haven’t been able to hit a TM driver worth a crap since the original burner. I know they are long and when I did catch one it would go, but I can’t hit them consistently in the fairway. Especially the Speed drivers, with their offset centers. I hate them with a passion. And yes, I do hit just about every one that comes out at my local range. I haven’t hit the M models yet.

      Alex

      8 years ago

      Hi David,
      I’m of a similar opinion that TM drivers as of late have been garbage (since the R9 in my opinion) however I hit the M1 recently during a fitting against other brands and was pleasantly surprised. The feel and look has improved greatly and I managed to get some good numbers with it. I still bought the King LTD instead (And LOVE it!) but it may be worth your time to try the M1.

      Jim Englebrecht

      8 years ago

      Been a long time coming

      Reply

      Doug Huntsinger

      8 years ago

      Nothing new to me

      Reply

      TopPakRat

      8 years ago

      If you want to see how Taylor Made operates look no further than their acquisition of Adams golf. They not only lost their shirt in the purchase of Adams but they destroyed the company. I would love to know what the current ROI (return of investment) Adidas has placed not only on Taylor Made but on Adams golf. If their CEO is not willing to budge on the price then I say Taylor Made in another 5 years will be another Adams golf. GOOD LUCK!

      Reply

      Mikey Hoffman

      8 years ago

      Parsons should buy it.

      Reply

      Top Pak Rat

      8 years ago

      Taylor Made or bust. Talk about a loss of valuation. I would be interested to see the ROI ( return of investment) on the acquisition factor of not just Taylor Made but on Adams Golf.

      Have you see Adams web site lately? Talk about being left out in the cold! They even have a link to the Golf Digest top 2016 equipment guide. Adams out of all categories only placed 1 item ( Super Game Improvement irons) and it only garnished a Silver. Not that I give a crap about the Hot List but why in the world would you publish this on your web site with only one placement. Zero in Drivers, Zero in Fairway Woods, Zero in Hybrids Zero in wedges and Zero in putters.

      I remember when Adams had outstanding Hybrids and some decent Drivers and a couple of under rated irons (MB2 blades and the CB forged line). This was all destroyed when they were put under the wing of Taylor Made.

      Taylor Made has been poorly managed in the last 5 to 7 years. . I know of very few companies that by assets just to destroy them.
      .

      Reply

      Pointer

      8 years ago

      They didn’t buy Adams to destroy them. They bought Adams to cannibalize them in hopes of saving themselves. Adams was one of the best things that happened to golf in years.

      Remember Carbite irons? I’ll bet you’d have a hell of a time trying to find out what happened to their excellent irons.

      Reply

      Daniel Dal Poggetto

      8 years ago

      More gloomy updates.

      Reply

      Uhit

      8 years ago

      Why gloomy?

      If they are clever, then they invest some millions to push Taylormade and its product line more forward (better hompages would be a start…), and multiply the investment when it comes to the sales price…
      …and if they keep Taylormade, then a better running business is also no harm.

      Gloomy would be, if they would be that dumb, to drop Taylormade at a unnecessary low price…
      …or if the golf community would loose one of the big alternatives and technology pushers of the market.

      Short term profit is no desireable goal – on the long run…
      …Bridgestone would be in my opinion the only attractive option (for the golf community), if adidas would sell Taylormade.

      However, I believe, that some structural changes – especially in the marketing and public relations department, better (more updated and more detailed) homepages etc., would be a great step to set things straight for the future.

      The technology is already there…

      Reply

      Greg

      8 years ago

      TaylorMade is, in certain ways, a victim of its own success. For the longest time, the approach was that of the underdog. When Mark King assumed the role of CEO, TaylorMade was half the size of Callaway ($400M vs. $800M in sales). They disrupted the marketplace with revolutionary technologies, such as moveable weight and adjustable loft technology, as well as accelerated product launches. These strategies, along with a strong culture of sales and growth, propelled TaylorMade past Callaway and others to the market leader. In fact, in 2012 TaylorMade had become twice the size of Callaway ($1.6B vs. $800M in sales). Long time employees were very proud of that 10 year growth, and rightfully so. What didn’t change when TaylorMade became the clear market leader (52% metalwoods market share in 2/12) was the underdog approach. Many senior leaders, promoted from former sales reps, continued to behave with an unhealthy sense of paranoia for competitors, specifically, Callaway. This was clearly evident when RBZ was replaced with RBZ Stage 2, especially when the former still carried strong commercial value. TaylorMade leaders assumed their metalwoods market share was in jeopardy and essentially killed the most successful product line in company history long before it was done churning a profit. The only financial goals ever discussed were those of the current fiscal year. Nobody spoke about a long term strategic plan, only how to achieve current sales targets and protect market share. The result, a complete erosion of profitability. The failure to adapt from a small growth company to a large market leader is why TaylorMade finds itself up for sale.

      Reply

      Pointer

      8 years ago

      I would like Bridgestone to take TM. It would give me better access to Bridgestone products like their fitted clubs. Yes!

      Reply

      Pointer

      8 years ago

      I would like Bridgestone to to take TM. It would give me better access to Bridgestone products like their fitted clubs. Yes!

      Reply

      JPBALL

      8 years ago

      As a former investment banker and avid Golfer, I would decry the sale of a leading equipment supplier to private equity. With history as a predictor, private equity will quickly transform the business to a high priced commodity stripping out differentiation while attempting to leverage the brand to narrow distribution and gain control over price. Creativity and innovation will certainly die.

      Reply

      pete the pro

      8 years ago

      Taylor Made are not the only company to find the golf equipment market tough. Rounds played are in some markets massively down – where I am its easily 30% down in 5 years. People don’t want to play golf like they used to. Suggesting that TM have not marketed their products or their clubs are sub-standard is, now, how do I put this…. okay, the polite version. Incorrect. Even if you have the advantage of owning a ball manufacturing plant (consumable goods, they make them, you lose them and buy some more next time) the market is tough and whilst you may have sales and in some areas even a profit, not enough to remain in golf manufacturing.

      Reply

      Mr. B.

      8 years ago

      Meanwhile, their big money (club) Pro- Am boondoggle taking place at Pebble Beach this week.

      TMAG still spending money like drunken sailors. What a scam.

      Reply

      Brad Wuhs

      8 years ago

      Bridgestone only bid to get a look at their financial situation.

      Reply

      Joe Gendron

      8 years ago

      The problem is the cycle being to fast with TM. 3-4 sets of irons per year, 2+ drivers every 10 months sometimes more in less time. You can’t spit out 50 products and expect the 45 that bought that one to buy the “new and improved” one just months later. Gotta stay on the Titleist and Ping cycle of less clubs. Making something every 2 years like Titleist allows consumers to have a non obsolete product in the 2nd year of the cycle. Unlike with TM where you might be now 2 new drivers behind.

      Reply

      Golf After 50

      8 years ago

      I am not a big Taylor Made guy, I am Callaway with regard to equipment but saturation with new products all the time combined with the aggressive marketing efforts leaves many consumers feeling that unless they have a bottomless bank account, they can’t keep up!

      Reply

      pete the pro

      8 years ago

      PING is family owned and Titleist is for sale for anyone mad enough to enter the golf manufacturing business. It’s nothing to do with product cycles – it’s to do with the overall size of the business and how many golfers are willing to pay a premium price for amazingly good technology. Customers queue around the black for new software, hardware, phones, etc, but golf is not in that league. We read too many contributors here who can’t wait to buy it on e-bay, second hand, etc. Who’s the loser here? Long term, maybe the golfer is the loser.

      Reply

      Benjamin Lee

      8 years ago

      I agree with Joe. The cycle is too fast. TM makes some great products but it is so hard to keep track of their equipment now. Before it was easy to know from what year it was made and the differences. Now it is just oversaturation of the market with TM stuff. The two year cycle is better. Titlest still releases new stuff every year but it is staggered. Irons/hybrids one year, woods the next. It creates more anticipation and buzz around the products.

      Reply

      Scott Finfrock

      8 years ago

      That is one of the biggest reasons I switched brands. I used to have the latest and greatest TM everything. But I got tired of the constant release of new “improved” irons. They haven’t made a good product since r11 irons and the r11 driver IMO

      Reply

      Fletcher A E Fletch

      8 years ago

      Plus with all this new equipment it lowers the value of what TM driver and irons I currently have…. the trade in value for future upgrade equipment is pointless. They need to re-evaluate their business plans.

      Reply

      Miguel Dabu

      8 years ago

      So the first news you posted is true after all.

      Reply

      PS Chanman

      8 years ago

      reap what you sow…

      Reply

      Guanto

      8 years ago

      The psi and psi tour are really good yet there has been minimal advertising and really no marketing done?

      Reply

      Ryan Holcomb

      8 years ago

      When a company is on the decline for some time would you say the product quality has also been on the decline? I wonder if they have cut any additional cost corners on their products compared to healthier golf companies.

      Reply

      Ryan Holcomb

      8 years ago

      MyGolf Spy i mean in a more literal since. TM is bleeding, so do things like quality of titanium, paint, welds etc go down? I can’t imagine quality of production staying the same as it was during their high points? But maybe they have?

      Reply

      MyGolf Spy

      8 years ago

      Actually, I think if you look at it from a performance perspective, the shifting of the marketplace, and how well a company is meeting the actual needs of the golfers it services, TaylorMade is doing quite well with its products.

      They’ve increased the average selling price by 1)raising retail prices and 2)eliminating much of the old inventory in the market, so these are good things from the company side.

      The issues, however, may extend beyond products. Golfers have been buying TaylorMade more than anything else for 10+ years. How many of us have gained 10, 20…how ever many more yards. Have our scores been lowered measurably. Basically, have the products done what they claim to?

      If they haven’t golfers may believe it’s time to try something/someone else. If that’s the case, then TaylorMade’s issues aren’t product driven, but that means there’s more difficulty in fixing them. – TC

      Reply

      MyGolf Spy

      8 years ago

      One would hope not. Obviously personnel has been cut, and we’re hearing stories that marketing will only spend on things they can correlate directly to sales. A few other cost-cutting rumors floating around too, but nothing I’m confident-enough in to repeat.

      I don’t think they’d sacrifice on build quality. Too much downsize to risk. The product has to be quality. – TC

      Reply

      John Anthony Eubanks

      8 years ago

      MyGolf Spy I think they pay too many professionals to play their club. They even brag about having the most played clubs on tour. That can’t be good for the wallet

      Reply

      Ryan Holcomb

      8 years ago

      John Anthony Eubanks pay for play will sell more clubs than a quality product

      Reply

      Elijah Simeon

      8 years ago

      They have too wide a range of products, they release a new driver every quarter but golfers aren’t buying a new driver every quarter. They need to put more effort into releasing one or two really great quality products every year not an ok product every 3 months

      Reply

      McaseyM

      8 years ago

      It appears that MGS is continuously misinformed….they are “being” sold, not “actually” sold as you may have tweeted previously. How dare you tell the future????? (please note sarcasm people)

      http://forum.mygolfspy.com/topic/15374-letter-from-taylormade-ceo-about-continuously-misinformed-mygolfspy/

      Reply

      Fozcycle

      8 years ago

      Kudos to you, Tony…..and to think TMAG was giving you “down the road” because of your Tweet. Shame on them.

      Reply

      David Taylor

      8 years ago

      Great article. Insightful and interesting

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Shoes
    May 16, 2024
    Pour One Out for NIKE’s Air Zoom Infinity Tour NRG
    Golf Technology
    May 16, 2024
    18 Luxury Golf Gifts We’re Drooling Over
    News
    May 16, 2024
    10 Best Florida Golf Courses You Can Get On