Callaway Chrome Soft Gets an X Rating
Golf Balls

Callaway Chrome Soft Gets an X Rating

Callaway Chrome Soft Gets an X Rating

Attention, devout fans of soft balls. Callaway has just announced the Chrome Soft X, its firmest soft ball to date.

Weird, right? No…not really.

Unless this is literally your first day shopping for golf balls, it should be reasonably obvious what this whole X thing is all about.

csx

Good, but Not For Everyone

While Chrome Soft has been immensely popular with consumers – so much so that it’s the #1 selling ball at off-course shops (where the shop’s ball selection isn’t driven by exclusivity discounts) – it’s reasonable and fair to say that it wasn’t for everyone.

Chrome Soft X was created for the same perfectly good reason why the Pro V1x, ZSTAR XV, B330, RZN Black, TPx, and even the Kirkland Signature were created. Better players, or at least higher swing speed players, need a different kind of ball.

Callaway concedes that some of its tour staff struggled with the 2016 models. At higher swing speeds, ball speeds would suffer as a result of too much deformation. Couple that with the low spin characteristics that made it difficult for some around the green, and you start to understand why Callaway felt there was a need for an X ball in its lineup too.

Which reminds me, if it’s not abundantly clear, Chrome Soft X isn’t a replacement for the 2016 Chrome Soft. It’s a complementary product for a different segment of golfers.

Moving on…

The challenge was to create a high-performance ball for higher swing speed players that is still worthy of the Chrome Soft name. That means increasing spin throughout the bag, but not firming things up to the point where Chrome Soft X wasn’t among the softest in the category.

csx3

Spin Baby Spin

That previous sentence is important. More Spin. Through the entire bag. Not just a club or two. That’s not to say it’s a flatline comparison with the 2016 Chrome Soft. Driver spin isn’t significantly higher. The same is true for those partial wedge shots and chips inside of 40 yards. Where golfers will see the most significant difference is with long irons and hybrids.

Callaway achieved this through 4-piece construction built principally around a firmer version of its Dual SoftFast Core. That’s Trademarked, by the way.

While I’m not supposed to talk about the competitive research with any degree of details, sufficed to say the spin curve is right in line with other prominent balls in the category.

Because of that extra spin, Chrome Soft X won’t fly as straight as Chrome Soft, but higher speed players will get more distance and greater control of the ball (workability).

csx-merge

Soft-ish

While, as is always the case, the X ball isn’t as soft as the non-X model, it’s still soft within the relative confines of the X category. By way of comparison, the 2015 Pro V1x has a compression rating of 105, while the Pro V1 sits at 90 – the same as the Chrome Soft X. My expectation is that both Titleist balls will soften a bit with the upcoming release, but it’s unlikely we’ll see the Pro V1x – the most relevant comp – come in under 90.

Updated HEX Cover

The Chrome Soft X features a softer cover material and tweaked aerodynamics, which contributes to the soft feel while producing a lower ball flight than the 2016 model.

csx2

Performance TBD

With the right baseline, I think you can get a decent sense of golf ball performance from looking at a spin chart. What I’ve seen suggests a ball that’s likely to be more to my liking than the first two iterations of Chrome Soft.

The slight bump in driver spin is a modest concern, but that should be at least partially offset by the higher ball speeds and the lower trajectory. What intrigues me most is the performance off hybrids and long irons. Perhaps it’s a bit of a unique approach, but once I’m satisfied with greenside performance, hybrid and long irons often prove to be where I differentiate between golf balls. That’s exactly why I think Chrome Soft X could work for me.

While the 2016 Chrome Soft likely remains the best choice for the majority, those of us who didn’t fall in love with Chrome Soft, may feel differently about Chrome Soft X. Who knows…I may even order a few dozen custom print Tonk balls.

Pricing and Availability

Available beginning 2/3/17 in both white and yellow, the Chrome Soft X will retail for $39.99.

For You

For You

Buyer's Guide
Sep 22, 2026
The Worst Hybrid We Tested In 2026 Was The One Testers Wanted To Buy
Alphard Cybercart_MW Electric Push Carts 2025 Alphard Cybercart_MW Electric Push Carts 2025
News
Sep 22, 2026
PGA TOUR Superstore Is Having a Rare Sale. Here Are The Five Things in My Cart.
Tributer Resort at Lake Anna Tributer Resort at Lake Anna
Travel
Sep 22, 2026
MyGolfSpy Experiences: Virginia’s Newest and Hottest Golf Destination
Preferred Source
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





      Troy Sheaffer

      9 years ago

      I tried the Chrome Soft X two weeks ago in Phoenix and was pleasantly surprised with my results.
      I did notice the ball is has a firmer feel then the regular Chrome Soft, especially around and on the green.
      My distance off the tee and from my irons was very good, at the very least matching the Chrome Soft.
      I also did note more spin with my approach shots, overall I think it’s a great ball that I will be playing full time when the weather warms up here in Pa.

      Reply

      Darrell Taylor

      10 years ago

      I would call it a rip off of the Wilson Staff “Smart Core.”

      Reply

      Richard Dowe

      10 years ago

      Are they available in yellow too?

      Reply

      Austin Kreger

      10 years ago

      If it’s more than $30 per dozen then it isn’t worth it

      Reply

      Dean M. Laramee

      10 years ago

      Lost in the woods

      Reply

      Andy Romanow

      10 years ago

      Is a broader taste test in the works? Would’t mind watching you mix Snell and Vice in with B330/S, prov/vx, TP/X, etc…if you can test 10 putters or drivers at once why not 10 balls. Would be a popular test…

      Reply

      Andy Romanow

      10 years ago

      That sounded pushy. Didn’t mean to be…thanks for doing all this. Is there some way you could synch up with a specific retailer whereby you’d at least get paid for the click? Would be nice to be able to patronize your crew without jeopardizing independence…

      Reply

      Jeremy Delaney

      10 years ago

      I think that would be huge if this was done. Finally find out what the ultimate ball is.

      Reply

      Phil Koufax Benjamin

      10 years ago

      The kirkland ball is great for the price but after playing half way threw my round I would use a fresh ball. The durability is not that great. I guess that’s why there 2 dozen for $25. But a great ball.

      Reply

      Jim Giles

      10 years ago

      confused… LOL

      Reply

      Gorse Richard

      10 years ago

      Is every new OEM ball now too expensive after the Kirkland signature?

      Reply

      Jon

      10 years ago

      Good point, by the way does anyone know when the K-Sigs are going to be available at Costco?

      Reply

      robet

      10 years ago

      Word is the K-Sigs may very well be discontinued :|

      Rich Hofer

      10 years ago

      No because it is not made anymore

      Reply

      Gorse Richard

      10 years ago

      Yes, because it was the normal manufacturing cost of tour spec balls, approx. $8 per dozen (fob minimum quantities apply). The retail price difference consisted of a much smaller profit margin for the retailer and brand. Balls like this are still available at that manufacturing cost. The problem is whether you can bypass the usual mark-ups for retailing. Where RRP is usual four times the cost of manufacturing.

      Reply

      Rob Roth

      10 years ago

      MyGolf Spy did Rock Ishii have a part in this?

      Reply

      Joe Goffin

      10 years ago

      His greatest creation was the ’16 RZN Tour Platinun!

      Reply

      Chuck Hill

      10 years ago

      This is a great ball. The CS for me was like hitting a waterballoon. The compression on the CSx is much better than the CS. I’ve been playing the SR3 for a long time. These CSx are a very welcomed change.

      Reply

      Cace Smith

      10 years ago

      It’s the ball that changed the ball that changed the ball that changed the ball.

      Reply

      Gil Bloomer

      10 years ago

      The ball that changed the ball, that changed the ball, that changed the ball, that changed the ball, etc.

      Reply

      Jordan

      10 years ago

      I still have a few dozen Hex Chrome+ Black lying around after cleaning out a Target. Would be interested in seeing how those perform again these new X’s. I always felt the Hex Blacks felt firm but flew very straight. Could never straighten out the Softs the same on drives with a 110 SS.

      Reply

      Brad Taylor

      10 years ago

      I dont get this….I don’t seem to have issues creating spin with the softer version of every ball? ProV1, tMade Tour Preferred, Chrome Soft. So I’m confused why companies think the firmer design is better for short game. I’ve practiced and tested for days on the short game area. The softer ball is better (for me) but for some reason it spins the least in the short game arena???

      Reply

      David Moore

      10 years ago

      The difference is when u carry a 10 meter pitch shot with a proV1 or any other high compression urethane ball it will carry 10 meters.
      Put down a chrome soft ball at 65 compression and that 10 meter carry will be 11-12 meters now.
      Try getting a tour player who has practiced that shot his whole life to now adjust to that length of swing suddenly going further.
      It’s nothing to do with the spin because the ball will still stop its Jump off the clubface that is the issue

      Reply

      Dave Martinez

      10 years ago

      this is their answer to the Kirkland ball.

      Reply

      Brad Taylor

      10 years ago

      The video talks about more spin in the short game dept not about compression. I’ve always felt the ProV1 spun more than the X. But according to Titleist, that’s not how it is.

      And this is NOT their answer to the Kirkland ball. Every successful ball has an “X” version. They are following suit with the rest of the industry.

      Reply

      Mike Mueller

      10 years ago

      Brad Taylor I agree. I think if anything this is their answer to the pro v1x. It’s nice to see them make something a little firmer. Hopefully it’s as low spin off the driver as the original. But who knows.

      Reply

      David Moore

      10 years ago

      The reason u can’t spin the ball is because the compression is lower. You don’t want to compress the ball on shorter shots you want the ball to glance off the clubface. This will create more spin. That’s why the higher compression X ball will spin more on shorter shots. What do I know tho I only do this for a living. Talk to your local pro maybe he can help you out

      Reply

      Brad Taylor

      10 years ago

      See I understand exactly what your saying and all I’m saying is I’ve done side by sides I think the firmer ball doesn’t grab the face as well for some reason V1Xs released much more than the regular V1s. Now I didn’t get much outside of maybe 20 yards. But this is just my experience. I’ve spent hours on the short game area practicing and occasionally pitting different types against each other.

      One thing I noticed is that the chrome soft spun more than V1s. And the spinniest was a Tour Preffered. The Taylormade V1 equivalent. I might go back to Titleist cause the heat really hurts the chromesofts feel. Or maybe try the X? Haha or Vice golf

      Reply

      Brad Taylor

      10 years ago

      Golf equipment is soo much more frustrating to navigate than golf itself hahaha

      Reply

      David Moore

      10 years ago

      when I said X I meant chrome soft X vs Chrome soft

      Reply

      Ray Murphy

      10 years ago

      Would love to see the comparison to the SR3… My best performing golf ball.

      Reply

      David Moore

      10 years ago

      The SR3 was a rock.
      I’ve found softer stones on my driveway

      Reply

      Troy Sheaffer

      9 years ago

      Ray, I also used the SR3 a few years ago and loved that ball. I think you will find that you’ll like the CSx even more.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Buyer's Guide
    Sep 22, 2026
    The Worst Hybrid We Tested In 2026 Was The One Testers Wanted To Buy
    Alphard Cybercart_MW Electric Push Carts 2025 Alphard Cybercart_MW Electric Push Carts 2025
    News
    Sep 22, 2026
    PGA TOUR Superstore Is Having a Rare Sale. Here Are The Five Things in My Cart.
    Tributer Resort at Lake Anna Tributer Resort at Lake Anna
    Travel
    Sep 22, 2026
    MyGolfSpy Experiences: Virginia’s Newest and Hottest Golf Destination