COBRA DS-Adapt and Wilson DYNAPWR Max on USGA List
Drivers

COBRA DS-Adapt and Wilson DYNAPWR Max on USGA List

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

COBRA DS-Adapt and Wilson DYNAPWR Max on USGA List

As proof that we’re rolling towards embargo and ultimately new release SZN, 2025 drivers from COBRA and Wilson have landed on the USGA’s conforming clubs list.

COBRA

COBRA’s new entries include 2 versions of the DS-Adapt LS and a DS-Adapt X.

Given last year’s models, it’s not a stretch to assume that “DS” is short for DARKSPEED.

It’s likely that only one of the LS models will make it to retail. Given COBRA’s history, it also seems likely that a MAX version will hit the list sometime before the retail launch.

DS-ADAPT LS

COBRA DS-Adapt LS (version 1)
COBRA DS-Adapt LS (Version 1)

The 3-weight system of the current DARKSPEED LS will carry over to the model. Marks on the club indicate neutral (heel), fade (toe), and high (back) positions for the heaviest of three weights (3g, 3g, and 10g).

DS-ADAPT X

COBRA DS-Adapt X
COBRA DS-Adapt LS X

COBRA’s X Model will again feature a front-back flip weighting system. The weight positions are labeled low (front) and high (rear), which is straightforward. COBRA’s X model has traditionally been reasonable low spin for a driver that falls somewhere near the middle of the market’s bell curve.

A footnote in all of this; hosels of the new models feature what appears to be a QR Code and text that reads “FF33”

Wilson

Wilson DYNAPWR Max
Wilson DYNAPWR Max

Also on the USGA list is the Wilson DYNAPWR Max. The new Wilson model appears to offer a backweight system. The visible portion is labeled “Neutral”, which suggests a movable weight system.

Despite the “MAX” nomenclature, nothing visible on the driver (or in the USGA description) overtly suggests this will be a 10K model.

We’ll see.

BONUS – Waoww Co Ltd Bang

From the Japanese market (I think) comes the Waoww Bang. It offers a dual-cog adjustable hosel and possibly the most elaborate sole design we’ve seen in quite some time.

I’m guessing this one won’t be among the most aerodynamically efficient models released in the coming months.

Stay Tuned

As noted, it’s getting to be that time of year. Stay tuned for more first looks and other release info.

For You

For You

Golf Talk
Aug 21, 2026
MGS Mailbag: Why Are Some Brands Not Included In Testing?
News
Aug 21, 2026
Think Par-3 Courses Are Just For Beginners? Play This One
News
Aug 21, 2026
Nikon Coolshot Pro 3 vs 50i: Is Stabilization Worth It?
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





      Brian Shuman

      2 years ago

      Waterproof Golf Shoes Scam. I am hoping you can bring some attention to this issue. In September 2023,I was gifted a pair of the Adidas MC87 Adicross 4D Spikeless Golf Shoes which sell for $250. I added them to my shoe rotation and wore them for about 10 rounds and liked them. Recently I wore them after a rain storm and the sole significantly leaked and my socks were very wet. I assumed they were waterproof for 2 years as they are a very expensive shoe. (My mistake) I contacted Adidas who insisted there was nothing they could do without a receipt. So I tracked down the receipt from my brother and submitted all the info needed. Adidas wrote back again denying the claim stating the warranty is only valid for 6 months after the DATE OF MANUFACTURING. I replied that was absurd as by the time they get to the store and purchased by a consumer most of the warranty is used up!
      They got back to me with a new letter denying my claim again but this time stating the warranty is valid for 6 months after the DATE OF PURCHASE and that 6 months is consistent with most golf show companies. Further research showed the shoes were warrantied water proof for 1 year and in smaller writing mention only the leather uppers are water proof. I will be leaving Adidas and looking for better customer service and will be certain to research the actual waterproof warranty of other companies.

      Reply

      Eugene Dizon

      2 years ago

      Can you share USGA Confirming list details on Sub 70’s new 859 drivers?

      Reply

      Steve-o

      2 years ago

      Wilson also had a regular sized carbon driver as well as an LS version on the approved list.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Golf Talk
    Aug 21, 2026
    MGS Mailbag: Why Are Some Brands Not Included In Testing?
    News
    Aug 21, 2026
    Think Par-3 Courses Are Just For Beginners? Play This One
    News
    Aug 21, 2026
    Nikon Coolshot Pro 3 vs 50i: Is Stabilization Worth It?