Customizing And Comparing The L.A.B. Golf OZ.1i And The New OZ.1
News

Customizing And Comparing The L.A.B. Golf OZ.1i And The New OZ.1

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Customizing And Comparing The L.A.B. Golf OZ.1i And The New OZ.1
  • The insert-free L.A.B. Golf OZ.1 mallet putter is available in stock and custom configurations.
  • The face of the OZ.1 lacks the stainless steel insert in the OZ.1i.
  • Stock and custom builds are available at labgolf.com.

When L.A.B. Golf released their new OZ.1i mallet in December, it made quite a stir. Not only was the mallet created through a collaboration with Adam Scott but it was the first L.A.B. Golf putter to feature a stainless steel face insert.

Additionally, the OZ.1i was the first L.A.B. Golf putter to have a zero-degree shaft lean option. All previous L.A.B. Golf putters had built-in forward press in the shaft, requiring a special L.A.B. Golf Press Grip to complete the build. The zero-degree option allows any grip to be used and should make the putter feel familiar to a traditional mallet player.

Naturally, the OZ.1i is still Lie Angle Balanced regardless of face or shaft options.

L.A.B Golf said an insert-free version of the OZ would be coming in the future. Well, the future is now. The OZ.1 with its all-aluminum face now is available.

Naturally, I had to check out this latest L.A.B. putter and, oh boy, do I have stuff to share. First, we are going to check out the custom build programs for the OZ.1i and the OZ.1. Does what you see on the computer screen match the delivered product?

After that, I’ll get to the question that many of you have about the two models: How does the type of face affect the play?

Creating the custom OZ.1i and OZ.1 putters

Of all of the things I investigate here at MyGolfSpy, one of my favorites is online golf club building. I enjoy spending time running the various configurations through the computer interfaces.

With each design tweak, I envision how the various build options will influence my putting success. Admittedly, I also just test out options to make the putter look cool.

The second part of the design process is satisfying as well. No, not the time spent waiting for the box to arrive but rather the opening of the box.

Nothing beats opening the box and discovering how the real life putter compares to the one I built on the computer.

Based upon my experiences, L.A.B. Golf’s custom track record is perfect. I’ve ordered five custom L.A.B. putters and all five have crushed any computer-generated expectations.

Needless to say, the bar was high when I submitted my custom builds for the L.A.B. Golf OZ.1i and OZ.1.

What are the custom L.A.B. Golf OZ options?

Going custom is going to cost you a minimum of $100. If you add a custom shaft, the price rises from there. Considering that the stock putter is already $499, that baseline extra hundred bucks pushes the price of a custom L.A.B. Golf putter above that of most of the putters in your local shop.

Is it worth it?

The short answer is yes. For the extra cost, you now have control over a broad suite of build options such as:

  • dexterity (right or left)
  • head color (8 color options)
  • head weight (standard. heavier, lighter)
  • putting style (standard or counterbalanced)
  • length (28″-36″ for standard build)
  • lie (63°-79.5°)
  • shaft lean (0° or 2°)
  • grip (7 Press Grip options)
  • alignment scheme (31 front and 21 rear alignment graphics)
  • putter shaft (steel, ACCRA, GEARS, or TPT)

That extra $100 allows you to build the exact L.A.B. putter that not only fits your eye but also your play needs.

New GEARS x L.A.B. Golf shaft option

In addition to the new face, the OZ.1 and OZ.1i also have a new shaft option: L.A.B.’s new GEARS putter shaft. L.A.B. Golf believes you should play a very stiff shaft in your putter to minimize any influence of shaft flex on your stroke.

However, they recognize that if a putter shaft is too stiff, it will feel harsh and negatively impact feedback.

As such, L.A.B. Golf has partnered with shaft manufacturers to produce graphite shafts of various stiffness. They are all stiff but some are stiffer than others.

This new GEARS x L.A.B. Golf shaft is not as stiff as their stiffest TPT shaft but it is stiffer than their ACCRA shaft. The GEARS option is a bit of a Goldilocks in terms of stiffness.

When building your custom, upgrading the shaft is the priciest option. Ideally, you can find a fitter with the various shafts to demo. If not, L.A.B. has a solid explanation of the shafts in their L.A.B. 101 section.

Dave’s OZ.1i and OZ.1 builds

This time around, I went conservative with my putter designs. OK, so that is a half truth.

For the OZ.1i, I chose a cappuccino brown finish and the new black GEARS shaft. I am a big fan of the ACCRA shaft but I had to see how stiff the new shaft played, especially since my stock OZ.1i has a TPT shaft.

Admittedly, I got a little more out there with the L.A.B. Golf OZ.1 build. Yes, it’s pink. Sometimes I get distracted by shiny things. The white version of the GEARS shaft seemed like a natural complement to the aesthetic.

This look makes it a perfect Valentine’s Day gift …

Outside of the colors, all of the other build specs were the same for the two putters. By minimizing variables, I hoped to better understand how the stainless steel insert of the OZ.1i rolled the ball compared to the all-aluminum face of the new OZ.1.

L.A.B. Golf is now 7-0

L.A.B. Golf’s “crushing the computer rendering” streak continues. Both putters looked way better in person than on the monitor.

The cappuccino L.A.B. Golf OZ.1i was a richer brown than I expected. I thought it would be flat brown for some reason. In person, the finish is very rich, especially in full sun where it radiates.

Depending upon the angle of the sun, I did occasionally notice the edge of the toe end screw hole at address. I could see the little scalloped edge at the bottom of the screw.

I don’t remember my eyes being drawn to that area with the black stock version. Obviously, since there is no insert to screw into, these holes are not present in the new OZ.1.

The hot pink is a dynamic finish. The shade of pink sits more toward the red side of pink than the whiter pink of the computer rendering.

This finish really pops in the sun, becoming ruby-hued from some angles. I love the way the white shaft and alignment lines complement the color as well.

The influence of the insert

Ultimately, the purpose of a putter is to get the ball in the hole. As much as I like building customs and seeing them for the first time, what I really like is making putts.

Prior to the OZ.1i, every L.A.B. Golf putter that has spent time in my bag has had an aluminum face with horizontal grooves. Not only is the stainless steel insert not aluminum but its milling pattern is completely different. It looks like a traditional milled face.

The story from L.A.B. Golf is that the stainless steel face of the OZ.1i gives it more pop and a firmer feel than the aluminum face of the OZ.1.

After rolling them head to head, I completely agree.

On average, the putts I made with the OZ.1i rolled further than putts from the same distance with the OZ.1. This was true for short putts as well as lags across the practice green. The insert makes the OZ.1i the hotter of the two versions.

Speed is not the whole story, though. I found the feel of the aluminum to be far more pleasing than the stainless steel. Perhaps I am biased because of my time spent playing the all-aluminum L.A.B DF3.

Regardless, you should expect the stainless steel face to feel significantly firmer than the aluminum face.

The princess and the pea

While rolling the two OZ variations, an intrusive thought crept into my head. Not only did the OZ.1i feel firmer than the OZ.1 but I also felt the head was heavier.

All of the build options were the same for the two putters but the OZ.1i seemed to have a heavier swing weight. I tried to ignore that idea as being ridiculous but it persisted so I went into the shop to measure the swing weights.

Sure enough, the swing weight of the OZ.1i was marginally higher than the OZ.1. What does that mean? First of all, it means I am overly sensitive to putter nuance. It also means that the extra weights on the OZ.1 don’t quite replace the mass of the insert and the OZ.1i.

This is not a knock on the OZ.1i, just something to consider when choosing the face for your OZ.

Which OZ should you buy?

Valid question. I’ll answer that with two questions of my own. First, what is your typical miss in terms of distance? Are you always short of the cup? If so, go with the stainless steel insert and the OZ.1i.

Do you frequently blast the ball past the hole or play on very fast greens? In that case, the extra pop-pop of stainless steel may aggravate your situation. Choose the softer aluminum face of the L.A.B. Golf OZ.1.

Once you determine the face that is right for you, then you can move on to all of the other build options. The GEARS shaft did seem to play softer than the TPT but I think my favorite shaft is still the ACCRA. As with the face feel, I prefer the softer feel of that still very stiff shaft. However, there are legions of L.A.B. Rats that swear by the TPT.

When you head over to the L.A.B. Golf site to check out the custom options, you’ll be impressed, and perhaps intimidated, by the alignment options. As per usual, there are some conventional ones, like my long T scheme, and some more exotic options. Have fun trying them out. I’m curious what you want to see on your putter when you address the ball.

If all of the options are overwhelming, reach out to L.A.B. Golf. They are known for their excellent customer service. I bet someone at L.A.B. HQ has the answer to your build questions. Don’t forget: You can get the whole custom process started with a Remote Fitting.

See all of the build options and design your L.A.B. Golf OZ.1 or OZ.1i at labgolf.com

For You

For You

Drivers
Mar 12, 2025
First Versus Worst Driver (2025)
News
Mar 12, 2025
6 Facts You Need to Know About Golf Shafts
FootJoy x Jon Buscemi FootJoy x Jon Buscemi
First Look
Mar 12, 2025
I Can’t Take My Eyes Off This Special Pair of Pretty Pink Kicks
Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe

A putter-obsessed recreational golfer, constantly striving to improve his game while not getting too hung up about it. Golf should be fun, always.

Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe

The Toulon Golf 2025 Collection
Feb 26, 2025 | 2 Comments
Does Vessel Have Some Competition?
Feb 25, 2025 | 5 Comments
Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe

Dave Wolfe





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Icedawg

      1 month ago

      Link has no lean, so not the first.

      Reply

      WBN

      1 month ago

      I’m sorry, but at $600.00 it would have to come with a guarantee on putts made. I tried one at the local golf store and liked it but not enough to buy it.

      Reply

      John Pugh

      1 month ago

      Dave,
      I’ve tried several LAB putters at some big box stores, none of them impressed me. A buddy has an extra DF3 that he loaned to me, it’s too long and the grip is too thick for me. I also need a more of an upright lie angle. But… playing a round of golf with his putter after watching several training videos and an hour of practice, I’m shocked and I’m sold on LAB. My big question from you, which model would you buy and use in your club championship?

      Reply

      Gabriel S

      1 month ago

      I am still waiting on someone to give a full breakdown on the difference between all 3 aftermarket offerings of shafts(Accra, Gears, TPT) in the OZi. I currently game the DF3 with an Accra, but have never tried a TPT shaft. I can definitely say that the steel shaft in the DF3 felt harsh to me, and I enjoy the softer feel that the accra provided. I love most things about my DF3, but tend to leave putts a touch short when I miss, as i like to let my puts die in. Having tried the OZi with a steel shaft, there is a noticable pop off the face, which is promising for me.

      Hopefully someone that has tried all 3 shafts can chime in.

      Reply

      Gabriel

      1 month ago

      I am still waiting on someone to give a full breakdown on the difference between all 3 aftermarket offerings of shafts(Accra, Gears, TPT) in the OZi. I currently game the DF3 with an Accra, but have never tried a TPT shaft. I can definitely say that the steel shaft in the DF3 felt harsh to me, and I enjoy the softer feel that the accra provided. I love most things about my DF3, but tend to leave putts a touch short when I miss, as i like to let my puts die in. Having tried the OZi with a steel shaft, there is a noticable pop off the face, which is promising for me.

      Hopefully someone that has tried all 3 shafts can chime in.

      Reply

      Kevin B

      1 month ago

      The esthetics of the club are not something I am pulled to. I have an odyssey putter that is a few years old and love it. I have not tried one of the LAB putters. I am not sure if these are order only like PXG or not. If they are, then for me spending money without trying it would have to be a pass for me.

      Reply

      Gabriel

      1 month ago

      You can try them at your local PGASS or Golf Galaxy if there are any near you. However, they tend to only order the stock offerings with steel shafts. You may even be able to find trade-ins that have an aftermarket shaft, but i feel that’s pretty rare to see.

      Reply

      Kurt VR

      1 month ago

      I went to the LAB headquarters and got fit last November. Tried every combination of head and shaft. Quickly gravitated to the DF3 with the Accra shaft. When the fitter went back inside to grab a few more, I picked up another DF3 with the Acrra shaft and when he came back I was making everything. It was the same DF3 head and shaft but with the heavier head set up. Red/Black with the long T logo. Night and day for me. In the OZ, I liked the TPT shaft better than the Accra. The DF3 was the one for me, 70 degree ,Pistol 2 degree grip, 34” black Accra shaft. HH alignment mark.
      You gotta try one and you gotta get fit! You still have to make the stroke but the hole just looks bigger.

      Reply

      Matt

      1 month ago

      Great new insights Dave! I do think a “No Torque putter can make a difference for a lot of people”. According to the President and creator of LAB. Also several 3rd party evaluators think a straight back putter swing will give much more value out of the “No Torque” putter vs someone who has an arc swing. All said, the bigger question as Dave alluded to, what is the difference between all of the brands science? I still cannot figure out why I would buy a low torque putter when I can buy a no torque putter. Thomas Dolby once said “Im Blinded by Science” I am getting freakin Dizzy!!!

      Reply

      Jim R.

      1 month ago

      Do the grooves in the aluminum version get the ball rolling quicker or better than the SS insert?

      Reply

      Chris Keramidopulos

      1 month ago

      I actually think the majority of putter swing lengths are 10 inches or less and if hit near or in the center will not create any discerning/noticeable
      torque. If a putter has a good feel and the individuals preferred weight, then it’s a keeper. If you’re hitting it off the toe or heel where torque ‘may’ come into play, then you would.be wise to practice your stroke rather than wasting your hard earned $$$.

      Reply

      Steve

      1 month ago

      I currently game a DF3, struggle with the softness if the face. Hopefully they will come out the a DF3i, “take my money”.
      Not all that wild about the OZ1/OZ1i looks, so probably won’t have one of them.

      Reply

      ericsokp

      1 month ago

      So I have an honest question regarding all the talk of “torque” vs. “torque-free” in the putter market (and please all you LAB fans don’t immediately take offense as I’m truly just trying to understand). On most putts, you only take the putter back approximately 20″ (or so), but I understand the concept of not wanting the putter face to rotate open or closed but remain square. However, what about all the other clubs in the bag? If LAB was to place a driver/fairway wood/iron in their “revealer”, wouldn’t those clubs rotate open or closed? Isn’t that of far more importance since the swing-arc of those clubs is so much greater than that of a typical putt? Is LAB (or anyone else) developing “torque free” woods and irons?

      Reply

      Stephen

      1 month ago

      Ericksokp- interesting question. I don’t know the answer, but my guess is with full swings there is so much force and so many moving parts that the impact of inherit torque on the club itself is not a material factor in whether the ball travels towards your target. In addition you’re holding the club so firmly in a full swing there may not be a lot of opportunity for torque to have a meaningful impact. In contrast, with the slow science of putting, subconsciously using your hands to prevent twisting creates enough variability to miss a putt, so it’s worth the effort to eliminate that variable. I would also love to hear about any actual research on this question.

      Reply

      OpMan

      1 month ago

      There are certain Rules in place as far as designs of clubs go, such as the sizes, the angles, where the shaft is allowed to enter the head etc
      https://www.usga.org/equipment-standards/equipment-rules-2019/equipment-rules/equipment-rules.html#!ruletype=er&section=rule&partnum=2&rulenum=5

      Reply

      Marty

      1 month ago

      Going physics nerd on you. There are several different forces happening in the golf swing and there are at least two levers involved. To try to zero all of those out would be impossible. What’s funny about the LAB approach is that you NEED to eliminate the wrist hinge in the putter swing or else their putters will perform as bad as any other putter. (Speaking from experience). However, lie angle balancing works perfectly with broomstick putters. You basically have one force controlling the putter and the face stays perfectly square to that force. Switching to the broomstick was the best thing I’ve ever done, golf-wise.

      Reply

      Jason

      1 month ago

      Great article as usual. Reading this didn’t help…its been weeks since I placed my custom order Oz and dying to get it in my hands!!

      Reply

      David B

      1 month ago

      Excellent analysis, Dave. Thanks for your insights. It seems to me that at this cost, it’s really worth the extra $100 to have the LAB putter fitted professionally. With all the options LAB offers — forward press versus zero, weighting, head shape etc. — it makes most sense to me to go into a qualified fitter and try everything. LABs are so diffferent than everything else on the market that eyeballing it isn’t worth it.

      Reply

      Chris F

      1 month ago

      Well written and well done article. I really like the customization options provided by L.A.B. Appreciated your comments regarding the new Gears putter shaft and your observations and impact of the face insert versus no insert in the Oz

      Reply

      Kelly Hawk

      1 month ago

      I have a mez 1 and like it. I would like to try one of these type compare. They in my opinion look heavier than mine but I don’t know that for sure. I do like the cappuccino color.

      Reply

      Lefty11

      1 month ago

      The OZ putter is the first LAB putter that has caught my eye. I´d like to roll a few with it.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Drivers
    Mar 12, 2025
    First Versus Worst Driver (2025)
    News
    Mar 12, 2025
    6 Facts You Need to Know About Golf Shafts
    FootJoy x Jon Buscemi FootJoy x Jon Buscemi
    First Look
    Mar 12, 2025
    I Can’t Take My Eyes Off This Special Pair of Pretty Pink Kicks