I Was A Non-Believer But After Robot Testing Golf Balls For 5 Days Straight, I’ve Seen The Light
News

I Was A Non-Believer But After Robot Testing Golf Balls For 5 Days Straight, I’ve Seen The Light

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

I Was A Non-Believer But After Robot Testing Golf Balls For 5 Days Straight, I’ve Seen The Light

Before I started working here at MyGolfSpy, I had serious questions about golf ball performance.

You’ve probably shared similar sentiments.

“I’m not good enough to play a good ball” or “a ball can’t make that much of a difference” are the two that echoed through my head.

But now that I’ve been a part of our (now) annual Golf Ball Test presented by UNRL, my skepticism has been converted to a die-hard belief that the golf ball you play matters. Much more than you think, I might add.

After spending five consecutive days teeing up ball after ball on a swing robot this summer, I noticed a few things I think you’ll find interesting. Please indulge me as I share some of the things that converted me to the church of golf ball performance. It will be worth your while, I promise.

Seeing Is believing

Let’s start here. Anyone can say a golf ball does something. Every manufacturer claims their ball does this or that. Almost every golf media outlet is happy to report that a golf ball might perform in a certain way.

But at MyGolfSpy, we KNOW golf balls perform a certain way. Why? Because our industry-leading testing puts them on a robot and we publish that objective data.

As a result, I learned very quickly that what someone says about a golf ball can be drastically different than what actually happens when a golf ball is hit. In that way, seeing is believing.

Rather than trusting the marketing blurb on the back of the box, MyGolfSpy puts every golf ball to the test with a robot to confirm or refute performance claims. With that said, here’s what I now know to be true about golf ball performance.

Golf balls, especially those with ionomer covers, perform differently when wet

Hardly anyone considers wet performance when it comes to golf balls.

It’s impossible to refute the impact that moisture has on ball performance when you see a golf ball lose nearly 70 percent of its spin on a wedge shot, all because of a little water.

Recently, I played The Cradle short course at Pinehurst with some really good golfers. It rained for most of the afternoon. My playing partners were shocked when our Titleist Tour Soft golf balls struggled to spin and stop on the greens. They had no idea that the cover was the culprit.

Confirmed on the robot and in the real world: ionomer spins less when wet.

A bad ball can cost you serious distance off the tee

You don’t realize how much shorter some golf balls are until you see them come off a robot at 100 miles per hour. It’s crazy standing downrange and watching a dozen premium balls land 15, 20, even 25 yards shorter than their competitor. Yet we see those kinds of distance gaps every year when we test golf balls.

Think about it. How much of a disservice are you doing yourself by playing a ball that’s that much shorter off the tee?

Golf ball consistency is a real thing

Snell Prime 3.0 Cores

You know what’s even more fascinating than some premium golf balls being shorter than others? Watching golf balls from the same box have drastically different ball flights.

One ball from the box launches dead straight, the next one takes a nosedive. I know it’s real because I’ve seen it. It is, after all, why we started our Ball Lab in the first place (which we’re looking to kickstart again, hopefully next year).

Who knew golf balls in the same box could be so inconsistent that they perform like they’re long-lost cousins rather than same-dozen siblings?

Call me a convert

Call me a golf ball convert. After seeing what I’ve seen, it’s impossible to ignore what impact your choice of ball has on your game.

The thing that’s helped my game the most the last three years? Choosing one golf ball that has proven to test well and sticking with it.

You should try it.

And if you don’t know where to start, head over to our full, industry-best golf ball test and give it a thorough read.

For You

For You

Instruction
Jun 9, 2026
If You Still Play Long Irons, Copy This Thought From Ludvig Åberg
PLM 2025_Most Wanted_Foresight GC3 PLM 2025_Most Wanted_Foresight GC3
News
Jun 9, 2026
College Golf Tournament Prep Looks Nothing Like It Did When I Played
News
Jun 9, 2026
The Best Father’s Day Golf Gifts That Won’t Break the Bank
Connor Lindeman

Connor Lindeman

Connor Lindeman

Connor is MyGolfSpy's resident sneakerhead and the authority on all things golf shoe performance. He's tested over 150 different pairs (and counting). When he isn't scrolling Twitter to find his next golf shoe purchase, you can find him at the piano or trying a new dessert place with his wife and daughter. #Lefty

Connor Lindeman

Connor Lindeman

Connor Lindeman

Connor Lindeman

Connor Lindeman





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      David white

      2 weeks ago

      Just knowing that this is a 115 compression let’s me know all I need to know that most high handicap players will not gain anything from this ball in fact as far as distance it is very likely they will lose yardage. If you don’t have a swing speed over 100 this is not going to help in a way most golfers are looking for (distance)

      Reply

      Dave H.

      6 months ago

      Unless you consistently play the same (few of us do), it’s a myth that there is just one for you. I have found that urethane balls are worth the extra $$ but can’t really tell the difference between a lot of them. The Pro V1 and Maxfli Tour are very similar and have had good rounds with each. That goes for a number of other urethane balls. I focus on the compression of the ball and suggest everyone do the same. I like balls in the 80s (based on MSG’s ratings). Thanks to MGS for doing these ball tests as no one else in the business is doing so and buyers are stuck listening to hype from the manufacturers.

      Reply

      David Sekyana

      6 months ago

      This was a really engaging read — the shift from skepticism to firsthand conviction feels genuine and relatable. I appreciate how the focus stays on data and testing rather than marketing hype, which builds real trust. It’s fascinating to see how consistent robot testing can challenge long-held assumptions golfers have. Definitely makes you rethink the importance of the ball you play.

      Reply

      Sam Lucas

      6 months ago

      Currently using the Kirkland ball. Good distance off the tee and decent spin around the greens.

      Reply

      Randy

      6 months ago

      Anyone play the Tour Response? Bought some for my son-he’s a big hitter with lots of speed and distance, but can use the lower spin. He also like the Maxfli S if bought this summer for him.

      Reply

      WYBob

      6 months ago

      The one real gem in the article is the potential return of Ball Lab in 2026. It’s been almost 1.5 years since the last one, and there have been a lot of new ball launched since then. There will be also a ton of new balls launched in the next several months, so between last year’s launches and the 2026 launches, there will be plenty for the resurrected Ball Lab to evaluate. Having MGS providing data on quality in addition to performance provides a real value add to your readers. IT would be great if MGS would also cross reference the results of the Ball Lab with your performance testing. So consider this a strong vote for the return of the Ball Lab!

      Reply

      Bob Walter

      6 months ago

      Awfully vague by MGS standards … only one brand mentioned.

      Reply

      Carl

      6 months ago

      This whole article is a joke. Is there a legitimate golfer out there who thinks the ball doesn’t matter? Then there’s the “testing”. Are any of these guys qualified to generate and evaluate data? OK, I know, this guy is a “sneakerhead” . I guess that’s close enough.

      Reply

      arud

      1 month ago

      Umm… That’s why he completely states robot, objective testing in the article. Dude, you definitely gotta get some new reading glasses!

      Michael Bodnar

      6 months ago

      I began playing Maxfli balls following MGS’s initial review (which was very impressive in my opinion). Began with the Tour model based on the performance characteristics vs Pro V1. I don’t normally play the Titleist but picked up a sleeves of each and attempted my own comparison…(my swing does not come close to that of the test robot). Found them nearly equal and for the price differential, it was a no brainer. Then decided to sample the various Maxfli models and definitely preferred the Tour series. Finally, worked my way through the various Tour models and not surprisingly, at age 80, settled on the Tour S. Been playing it ever since.
      BTW, took some time to go through the experiment, but once into the Tour series comparison, found the Maxfli “3 for” pricing very helpful as I was able to mix & match with my purchase.

      Reply

      CoursePro

      6 months ago

      God Bless you Micheal, 80 years of age and not only out their playing, but doing so in a serious manner with all the time devoted to the testing. You compared the two best balls out there in my mind. I play the ProV but have played the MaxFli Tour x and really liked it. If I didn’t get such a good deal on ProV’s it would be tough to choose.

      Reply

      Fake

      6 months ago

      I really like the Tour X. I started playing it last season. I also appreciate the price point, and the bulk discounts. Can’t lose.

      Reply

      Maxflier

      6 months ago

      I’ve gotten 2 boxes of 4-dozen Maxfli Tour X balls on the last two weekends for $95 each box after discounts. It’s a no brainer, as Maxflis are just as good as ProV1X balls.

      Carl

      6 months ago

      Oh what do you know, a maxfli endorsement on this bullshit site. Does anyone ever wonder why this garbage always shows up on the Google feed? It’s because this is a shill site for dicks sporting goods, who will never get 1 penny from me. Fuck off Dicks heads.

      Reply

      Steve O

      6 months ago

      And yet, here you are

      HikingMike

      6 months ago

      Uh, lol. There are a lot of individual people that are saying good things specifically about the Maxfli Tour X, and it’s not because they are big Maxfli fans (which makes it speak even more IMO). Have you been living under a rock? Also, take a look at the ball test data. It’s objective. Look at another site’s ball test data if you like as well.

      T Duncan

      6 months ago

      Interesting that a shill site for Dicks Sporting Goods would send their affiliate “buy now” links to Amazon???

      arud

      1 month ago

      These guys existed long before Dick’s entered the branded ball and clubs arena. You must still be mad about Dick’s getting out of the gun business. As an employee, I can confirm the numbers, there weren’t enough sales to continue having them in all stores. After all, we are trying to make more money, not less.

      WL

      6 months ago

      Played the Wilson Triad now for two years straight. 14 hdp. 95mph SS. Perfect ball for me and very, very consistant.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Instruction
    Jun 9, 2026
    If You Still Play Long Irons, Copy This Thought From Ludvig Åberg
    PLM 2025_Most Wanted_Foresight GC3 PLM 2025_Most Wanted_Foresight GC3
    News
    Jun 9, 2026
    College Golf Tournament Prep Looks Nothing Like It Did When I Played
    News
    Jun 9, 2026
    The Best Father’s Day Golf Gifts That Won’t Break the Bank