Longest Versus Shortest Irons of 2024 (Is Distance What Your Game Really Needs?)
News

Longest Versus Shortest Irons of 2024 (Is Distance What Your Game Really Needs?)

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Longest Versus Shortest Irons of 2024 (Is Distance What Your Game Really Needs?)

In 2024, we analyzed more than 60 sets of irons, evaluating them for distance, accuracy and forgiveness. We maintain accuracy is the most important factor when it comes to choosing the right golf iron.. Yet, many golfers believe that improving their iron game hinges on maximizing distance. With that in mind, here’s a comparison of the longest and shortest irons of 2024. Does this shift your perspective on how much distance truly matters?

Super game-improvement irons

Best super game-improvement iron for distance

Let’s start with the super game-improvement irons. We tested 10 irons, and the PING G730 was the best for distance. Their 7-iron carry distance was about eight yards longer than the Mizuno JPX 923 Hot Metal HL.

The PING G730 ranked seventh overall because their accuracy and forgiveness were near the bottom of the list. The Mizuno JPX 923 Hot Metal HL, the shortest iron in the test, was the most accurate and runner-up for forgiveness.

If you are looking for a mix of distance and accuracy/forgiveness performance, look at the Cleveland Halo XL Full Face. It’s third best for distance but ranked third overall in the test. If accuracy is your thing, then the three shortest irons in the test will give you a lot to choose from.

CategoryIron ModelDistance RankAccuracy RankForgiveness RankOverall Rank
Longest IronsPING G7301897
Callaway Big Bertha29109
Cleveland Halo XL Full Face3463
Shortest IronsMizuno JPX 923 Hot Metal HL10122
Tommy Armour 845+8211
Tour Edge Hot Launch E5249344

Game-improvement irons

For game improvement irons, we see the MacGregor MACSPD is the shortest but most accurate iron in the test. It ranked fifth overall because of its lack of distance capability. The Wilson Dynapower is the longest iron in the test but it ranked last because of poor accuracy and forgiveness.

The TaylorMade Qi10 is a good middle ground. It ranks third for distance and fifth for accuracy. It’s just not the most consistent of the irons we tested.

The best game-Improvement iron of 2024 is the Tour Edge Exotics E723, which is fourth for accuracy, fifth for distance and the best for forgiveness.

CategoryIron ModelDistance RankAccuracy RankForgiveness RankOverall Rank
Longest IronsWilson Dynapower1151717
PXG 0311 XP GEN62161616
TaylorMade Qi1035137
Shortest IronsMacGregor MACSPD17125
PING G43016658
Cleveland Zipcore XL1512715

Player’s distance irons

COBRA KING Forged Tec X Iron review

There are two stand-out irons in the player’s distance iron test that work well for a golfer stuck between choosing distance or accuracy. The COBRA KING Forged Tec X is the runner-up for best player’s distance iron of 2024. It is also the longest and second most accurate.

The PING i530 had similar testing results with a second-place performance for distance and a sixth for accuracy. You’ll notice both of these irons struggled with forgiveness (measured by the consistency in the shot outcomes).

The TaylorMade P770 23′ is one of the better options for the shorter-hitting irons. It ranks second to last for distance but ninth for accuracy and first for forgiveness. For powerful golfers who are not worried about distance but are more concerned about repeating shots, the P770 23′ could be a good choice.

CategoryIron ModelDistance RankAccuracy RankForgiveness RankOverall Rank
Longest IronsCOBRA KING Forged Tec X12152
PING i53026173
Callaway Paradym3151813
Shortest IronsMacGregor MT-Milled185511
TaylorMade P-770 23′179110
Kirkland Signature1613614

Player’s irons

Callaway Apex Pro player's iron Best for distance

With player’s irons, you’ll see a pretty clear case of having to choose between distance and forgiveness. The shortest iron in the test, the T-100, is fifth overall and the most forgiving player’s iron of 2024. The second-to-last iron for distance performance is the TaylorMade P-7MC, which was so strong in accuracy and forgiveness that it won first place overall, even after its lack of distance.

Let’s face it, if you are using a player’s iron, distance is probably not your main concern. The bottom part of this table would be where you want to focus your attention when picking your next player’s iron.

CategoryIron ModelDistance RankAccuracy RankForgiveness RankOverall Rank
Longest IronsCallaway Apex Pro1161214
Ram Axial Forged210183
Mizuno Pro 243313177
Shortest IronsTitleist T-10019615
TaylorMade P-7MC18121
Callaway Apex CB173611

Bottom line: Does it make sense to chase distance?

Hitting the golf ball further undeniably makes golf easier. However, purchasing irons specifically for distance may be a mistake.

Our 2024 iron tests reveal that accuracy and forgiveness consistently outweigh pure yardage gains in overall performance. While the longest irons in each category can add yards to your game, they often fall short in precision and consistency. On the other hand, the shortest irons tend to shine in accuracy and forgiveness.

Ultimately, the best iron for you will depend on your specific needs and priorities. Chasing distance is tempting but it’s not always the key to improving your game. Go for a golf club fitting to see what’s best for you.

For You

For You

News
Jun 19, 2026
USGA Spot On With Shinnecock Setup During Blustery Opening Day
News
Jun 19, 2026
PAYNTR’s Rise Is No Accident: Five MyGolfSpy Members Tested The Reserve Classic Tour RS
News
Jun 19, 2026
Scratch By 50: I Switched From The Worst-Rated Driver To The Best-Rated Driver
Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz

Britt Olizarowicz is a scratch golfer, former teaching professional and one of MyGolfSpy’s leading voices on equipment testing and golf performance. She has spent more than 15 years working at private clubs in New York and Florida and now specializes in translating test data and swing mechanics into practical advice for everyday golfers. Britt began playing at age 7 and has never left the game. When she’s not writing, you’ll find her on the course, playing pickleball, cooking, running or out on the boat with her family.

Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz

Brittany Olizarowicz





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Kevin

      1 year ago

      I think MGS does a disservice to golfers by testing irons grouped by the number printed on the bottom of the club. They should test irons grouped by their loft. For example, group 1 is for irons lofted between 32-33* regardless of the number printed on the bottom of the club. If a company doesn’t make an iron with that loft then either bend the closest club to fit in that loft range or exclude it from the test.

      Reply

      Kurt VonRueden

      1 year ago

      Ping g730 7 iron is 28 degrees whereas the Mizuno jpx923HL 7 is 31 degrees. Hardly a fair comparison when discussing distance. Maybe a Mizuno jpx 923HL 6 iron, which is 28 degrees, 1/2” short to normalize lengths would be a better comparison of distance.

      Reply

      Härtel Jens - Jürgen

      1 year ago

      I am really puzzled about this article. Not only how it is presented, but by the fact that the most praised winner in the Players Distance category, Srixons ZX5MK II, was not even mentioned ! If it was t the perfect mix of all, why did it win ? And since it had won, why is it not mentioned in this article? As said, I am confused about the content of this article.

      Reply

      Mr Ed

      1 year ago

      Based on the comments a LOT of people are missing the point of the article.

      Reply

      Tim

      1 year ago

      Or you are interpreting the article differently than they are. Accuracy and forgiveness should be measured when using the same loft iron in order to get a true comparison. You are strictly going with longest doesn’t necessarily mean most accurate and forgiving.

      Reply

      Lance Sedevie

      1 year ago

      Equal lofts they are all the same. Loft is key component of distance Bs Marketing

      Reply

      Gerald Foley

      1 year ago

      Not to state the obvious but getting fit by a good fitter will have you understanding each maker’s tech. Allow me to relate my experience. I’m 77 and play to a 6 handicap and yes from primary Sr tees. In my younger days I was as low as a 1 and played blades. But swing speed is now upper 90’s with my driver. Finally went to player distance Mizuno 245’s. I told the fitter my goal was to hit a 7-iron 150. His job was to put me in a club that would go the not only the distance I wanted but also the proper descent angle with adequate spin rate to actually stop on the green. I didn’t want to hit a low 6 or a long high 8-iron. Near the end of the fitting i was hitting the Mizuno 245 7-iron 155 but the fitter didn’t like the descent angle (too low) and low spin rate so switched shafts. I then dropped distance to 150 and descent and spin were perfect. I chose mizuno over several other brands based on feel and feedback even tho a couple of others were longer. That’s what fittings are all about.

      Reply

      Brent

      1 year ago

      You are so correct. Get fitted in person by a good fitter, not online, 98.9% who think they now how to fit themselves online don’t.

      Reply

      Gerald Foley

      1 year ago

      As a follow up to my fitting experience I should include that over the past 10 years as i aged and swing speed decreased I went from Mizuno MP 30/32’s to Mizuno blended 917’s (I think?) to my current Mizuno 245’s. My shafts went from stiff to medium to graphite. All these years my goal was to hit similar shot shapes with the same clubs (ex:7-iron) rather than adapt to hitting lower approach shots with clubs I can no longer hit the way I used to. I’ll throw some fuel on the fire with this hot topic….I still hit 2-3-4 irons albeit Mizuno FliHi’s rather than switch to hybrid woods because I frankly don’t like the ballflight of hybrids vs long irons. For “my” game I want to keep hitting shots the same way I always did. I’m a dinasoar I know but I don’t like hitting hybrids high in windy conditions and prefer the shot shapes of a traditional 2-3 iron. As you age and your swing slows down the only thing you can do is change tech to help maintain your game.

      Matthew

      1 year ago

      It would be great if we could include some measurements for distance and accuracy (dispersion). For example, if the Ping was the last one in distance, how many yards was it shorter than the club that ranked first? If it was only a yard, that doesn’t really matter. The same goes for accuracy.

      Reply

      The Old Pro

      1 year ago

      I’m baffled by the chase for iron distance. Lofts keep getting stronger. A 7 iron is still 7 iron length (generally) but now it has 5 iron loft. Nothing is more useless than a 7 iron I can’t get up in the air and that is what happens when you take the same length club and decrease the loft. I understand the designs are geared to launch it higher but a large percentage of the people who need higher launching clubs don’t want the lofts jacked. It totally defeats the purpose of a forgiving and higher lunching club. If I wanted it to go lower, I would buy a 3 iron…. oh, wait… most companies don’t make them because lofts are so strong the 5 iron is a 3 or 2 iron. WOW.

      Reply

      OpMan

      1 year ago

      Selling clubs to stoke people’s egos

      Reply

      Manotee

      1 year ago

      Since there is no standardization in iron lofts, distance differences are meaningless. Picking irons in testing based on loft versus numbers would make comparisons easier. Having a link to full measurements for all clubs tested (loft, shaft length, actual distance) would make the rankings more meaningful. If I have a set of irons I hit with accuracy, I can pick the right club for the yardage with confidence. The only numbers that count are the distance from the pin and the number of strokes. If more accurate irons get me to those numbers, what do I care about the number on the club?

      Reply

      The Old Pro

      1 year ago

      EXACTLY. This article has no value as it is presented.

      Reply

      James Wadden

      1 year ago

      Seems as though some of responses targeted the rankings by MGS. After I read the article my thoughts were focused on the message in the article. That message seems to be “don’t get fooled by distance gains when buying new irons since that distance gain is usually associated with stronger lofts. Stronger lofts are associated with lower decent angles and less spin resulting in less accuracy and forgiveness.” Please stop shooting the messenger.

      PapaRutz

      1 year ago

      There is still a ton of players that don’t understand the difference.. I will make a comment about my 7 being 32* and there’s being longer because it’s 29* and they give me the blank stare…

      Reply

      Denny’s clubs

      1 year ago

      When you check the irons, I do know you do a good thorough job. But I’m curious if you checked off to see if they’re all the same.. check frequency if the approximate frequency. And the links of all the same length.. but I’ll make a difference. Or they hit by people that you use you take the best results or average results.. thank you I find them always interesting.

      Reply

      Ed Lewandowski

      1 year ago

      Hooray, somebody finally speaks out about loft.

      I have Callaway AI irons. Nice look but I’ve gone back to my Mizuno irons of decades back.

      Reply

      Jim

      1 year ago

      Distance is a worthless metric for any club other than driver and probably the 3 wood. I hit my 8 iron repeatably 150 yards. If I am 160 out, I don’t wish I had a longer 8 iron. I grab my 7 iron and give it a go. Accuracy and forgiveness is king.

      Reply

      Tom

      1 year ago

      Fully agreed. With the G730 at 28 degrees loft and the Mizuno HM HL at 31 degrees an 8 yard difference means the Mizuno is longer. This is more about loft gaps and playability. What is the decent angle of that 28 degree 7 iron at 70 mph? If less than 40 degrees will it even stop on the green

      Help us understand what the total result is at a swing speed and that will really help.

      Reply

      PapaRutz

      1 year ago

      I can’t agree with you more, you are spot on.

      Reply

      Todd

      1 year ago

      I’m trying to make some sense of the results. Is there no contol for club length and loft? Seems to be an apples to oranges comparison.

      Reply

      Tim

      1 year ago

      Agreed. MGS club rating process needs an update IMO.

      Reply

      Gerald Foley

      1 year ago

      Again I believe everyone is offbase on all this. It doesn’t matter what different brands set their 7-iron at. No two golfers swing the same anyway. We all have different swing speeds and angles of attack and different tempos that flex shafts differently. The whole point “should “ be getting fitted to achieve your individual goals. I’ll give you a perfect example. My best golf buddy hits his driver lower than I do. His ball winds up almost as far as mine even though My ball carries 20 yards further. His ball rolls out almost to mine. He then hits typically 1 club less than me with a lower ball flight. We all have different games. I go and get fitted and try several brands and have mixed performances and the fitter analyzes my data and we switch from shaft to shaft again looking at my data. So even if one 7-iron is set stronger with my AOA and swing speed and shaft characteristic I wind up hitting it with a desired launch angle and distance and desired descent angle and spin rate why the hell do I care what the face angle is?? At my last fitting I hit Sryxon’s longer but didn’t like the feel. I probably could have purchased any number of irons for different reasons but really liked the Mizuno 245’s feel and sound. The fitter got me to my desired shot shape with desired spin rates and descent angles etc. That’s what it’s all about. I could care less what the strength of the face is. I just want to play good golf.

      Eric

      1 year ago

      My takeaway from this article is that price and brand are meaningless in irons. Tommy armour is the number one super game improvement? Ram is the 3rd rated Players iron?!?

      Reply

      Henry

      1 year ago

      I’d like these comparisons to compare loft angles, say each set’s club closest to 30*; AND disclose what that loft angle is. Just saying “7-iron” means nothing.

      And while I understand why manufacturers hide loft angle discussion, I do not understand why MGS seems to as well.

      Reply

      Todd

      1 year ago

      I just looked it up and the Ping 7 iron is the same loft as the Mizuno 6 iron. Can we just start stamping lofts on clubs at this point?

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    News
    Jun 19, 2026
    USGA Spot On With Shinnecock Setup During Blustery Opening Day
    News
    Jun 19, 2026
    PAYNTR’s Rise Is No Accident: Five MyGolfSpy Members Tested The Reserve Classic Tour RS
    News
    Jun 19, 2026
    Scratch By 50: I Switched From The Worst-Rated Driver To The Best-Rated Driver