Revealed: The 5 Cheap Golf Balls That Dominated Sales in 2024
Golf Balls

Revealed: The 5 Cheap Golf Balls That Dominated Sales in 2024

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

Revealed: The 5 Cheap Golf Balls That Dominated Sales in 2024

We’ve started planning for the 2025 robot ball test and part of the plan this year is to include more of the cheap stuff.

Let me define cheap. I’m talking about the two- and occasionally 3-piece stuff with ionmer covers. While these balls get zero tour play, they’re loved by a segment of golfers for their lower price points, often soft (dare I say, super soft feel), and the variety of colors and patterns in which some models are offered.

It should go without saying that we can’t test everything, but we want to make sure we include some of the most popular models. To that end, we did some research to figure out what those balls are.

Our requisite fine print is that not every place that sells golf balls sold reports sales data. With that, sales data for direct-to-consumer brands can be spotty, but the list does give us a good idea of what the best-selling models (by unit share) were for 2024.

Let’s look at top 5.

#1. Callaway Supersoft

No surprise here. Supersoft rivals Chrome Soft for popularity in Callaway lineup. It’s cheap and while you’ll never confuse its speed and spin performance with Chrome Tour X, no small number of golfers love its soft feel. On our gauge, Supersoft remains the softest ball on the market.

#2 Srixon Soft Feel

The Soft Feel doesn’t exactly offer the tour-level performance profile of Srixon’s Z-Star series, but for those looking for another option in the soft feel/low price category, this Srixon offering is entirely on the nose.

#3 Titleist TrueFeel

Does anybody else see a pattern?

TrueFeel has the distinction of being both the softest and least expensive ball with a Titleist logo. That first bit seems to define the $24.99 price point.

#4 Titleist Velocity

As we move down the list, the market shifts a bit. The Titleist Velocity golf ball is designed to do one thing and do it well. Titleist’s 2-piece distance ball designed to go far and yeah… that’s pretty much it.

#5 Pinnacle Rush

Made at same factory as Velocity and TruFeel, Rush is kinda like the former with a friendlier price point than the latter although I can’t imagine anyone would suggest it offers soft feel.

Other notables:

While the top 5 certainly tells us a lot about the market, what’s even more revealing might be #6 on our list – a ball that defies all conventional wisdom about what should sell well in today’s market.”

Dear God, why?

#6 TaylorMade Noodle ($27.99 for 2 dozen) – Yes, Noodle is a TaylorMade ball – the company’s best-selling cheap option. Perhaps Gary McCord is to blame for the continued popularity, and frankly, that’s all I have to say about that.

Premium Ionomer

My 2-cents, buying either of the next two balls on the list are the equivalent of firing at a front pin on the edge of water hazard.

They’re a sucker’s play.

I’m not disputing that they’re likely the best-performing balls with an ionomer cover, but the only reason they exist is to siphon money from golfers not willing to spend $50+ on premium offering, but also not entirely trusting of DTC urethane offerings.

Get off the fence and make a better choice.

#9 Titleist Tour Soft ($39.99) – Titleist’s premium ionomer offering. The company believes the best performing ionomer ball on the market, but that’s a bit like laying claim to making the best gourmet ramen. Sure, some people love it, but nutritionally, there are better options.

#11 ERC Soft ($39.99) – the market’s other premium ionomer offering, ERC matches Tour Soft for price and is likewise positioned as a top-performing, premium ionomer golf ball. My own personal consolation in this is that, by volume, Callaway’s sub-$20 Warbird outsells ERC Soft.

Something from everyone

Since we’re making the list anyway, I also wanted to include the top-selling model with quantifiable market share from some of the brands we haven’t mentioned

#7 TaylorMade Speed Soft – Technically Noodle is a TaylorMade ball, but we wanted to include the top-seller with a TaylorMade logo.

#13 Bridgestone e6  ($23.99) – Sells just a bit more than the e12 Contact.

#16 Wilson DUO Soft ($22.99) – Not quite Supersoft, but not far off for golfers seeking the soft feel a golf ball has to offer.

#18 Volvik VIVID ($29.99, on sale for $19.99) – The ball that, for better or worse, put matte on the map.

Surprises?

Is there anything here that surprised you? Let us know in the comments.

For You

For You

News
Jun 26, 2026
3 “MyGolfSpy Approved” Golf Rangefinders On Sale
Buyer's Guide
Jun 25, 2026
Do Slow Swing Speed Golfers Really Need A Draw-Biased Driver?
News
Jun 25, 2026
Why Is No One Talking About This Golf Bag? I Tried it Out And Can’t Stop Blabbing About It
Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey

Tony Covey





    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      pineneedlespro

      1 year ago

      I have used the T.M. Noodle golf balls in the winter time. Those are a good price, good distance, the cover holds up, lower compression for cold weather, good feel, and the balls go through my ring gauge easily without being too big or out of round.

      Reply

      Rob V.

      1 year ago

      Going off your 2021 tests, I narrowed myself down to Vice Pro and Titleist Tour Speed. Found a day to play both balls, found the Vice Pro got me more distance off Tee, and the type of spin around greens that work for my game. So really looking forward to y’all adding the DTC balls again, seeing as Vice has recently changed up their lineups, and I fear I might fit into another ball.

      Reply

      Birdie Dancer

      1 year ago

      Great Balls of Fire…. raise your hand if switching from “cheap soft balls” instantly reduced your handicap from 20+ down to single digit… u know that day you found a Pro V1 in the woods, looking for yur opening tee shot….and used it the rest of the round shooting a career score. that happens all the time right?

      Reply

      bob

      1 year ago

      I switched from Maxfli Tour X to Pinnacle Rush. They are great balls and you cannot beat the price. Plus, scoring the same as I always did, outdriving my playing partners and stopping a Pinnacle on a dime from 105 out is pretty sweet.

      Reply

      Mike

      1 year ago

      Guys, why the attitude against these balls? None of you guys (and me included) are going to play on the PGA or Champions tour. Some 80% of golfers don’t keep handicaps, which means they’re not super-serious & they just want to go out there & have fun.

      I have found probably 10,000 “premium” balls over the past 15 years. Wonder if any of the original owners of those balls wished they hadn’t thrown away that money?

      Reply

      James Heard

      1 year ago

      Srixon Q-Star Tour is a great ball and a decent compromise. It’s my go-to usually.

      Reply

      Fake

      1 year ago

      I played it for a while. I found that they sometimes felt “off”, and I don’t just mean on poor hits. I’ve found the Vice Pro to be a little more consistent.

      Reply

      Punchy

      1 year ago

      Remember the Precept Lady? I remember the big craze when they first arrived at our Pro Shop back in the mid to late 90’s. Today I still play the Lady which is now the Precept Laddie. As a young 70+ year old and an 8 handicap playing 5800-6100 yards I very seldom look for a ball that I mishit in the woods or water. Drop another and keep going and add your strokes accordingly, no stress. My son recently bought some Precept Laddie golf balls at Walmart for a discount price of $15.00 for 2 dozen – what a bargain. Love living and playing in Myrtle Beach.

      Reply

      alii1959

      1 year ago

      I have always had a difficult time deciding on a golf ball. Played many cheap balls when I started playing and got accustomed to the pop off the face of the club. I am not really fond of the “sticky” feel of some of the urethane balls. That said I will concur with the mention of the Wilson Zip. It is a great ball. I spend most of my time practicing chipping and putting. It chips exceedingly well for me and putts pretty well. I do lose a bit of distance, but otherwise I really like it. I play often with the Supersoft. Great all around ball. But, the ball that I seem to be falling in love with lately is the Pinnacle Rush. Found one on the course and shot one of my lowest rounds lately…74. I am a 5 handicap and have played all of the expensive golf balls…ProV1x is the latest. I like the ProV1x, but it is expensive and it doesn’t roll out very well for me. Plus, I don’t get the spin that many speak of. For me the Rush is very predictable, which is the key. Think I am going to have to order some and give them a shot at staying in the bag. Not everyone likes, wants, or needs expensive golf balls. Some of us do play for roll out. I have backed up TiTech/InTech balls from Wal-Mart before. If you cannot control that spin, or at least have some idea how to get the spin you are looking for then I am not sure how it improves your game. A ball that is predictable is probably going to help you lower your scores quicker.

      Reply

      Duane

      1 year ago

      I have been a single digit handicap (3-8) for the last 40 years or so. During that time I have used Titleist NXT, NXT Tour, ProV1, ProV1x, Tour Soft, Taylormade TP5, Callaway Chrome Soft, Srixon Q-Star, Q-Star Tour and AD333. During this time and with whatever ball I used I score between 75 and 85. Why should I pay $55 per dozen for balls when $35-$40 balls work just as well? By the way, try the Vice Tour, a 3 piece, ionomer cover ball. It performs very well.

      Reply

      Golfzilla70

      1 year ago

      FINALLY MGS apparently has heard the masses. That bit where they added one ionomer ball to their comparison last year of all their other urethane balls in the ball test was woefully inadequate. Although the snarkiness of this article was painfully apparent, i’m hoping they can actually give straight-forward data on the balls and try to look at the thing with a neutral unbiased viewpoint. Try to look at it in a way to see how these cheaper balls can actually help golfers outside of price point, because they can.

      Dumbing down the chipping game by keeping the ball low and letting it roll out would benefit so many golfers that just don’t have the time to get good at unlocking the benefits of the urethane ball. You don’t have to be expert level to hit a low runner from off the green to get it reasonably close. If you play an ionomer ball you might find yourself from time to time wishing you had a spinny ball because you’ve short-sided yourself, but i’d be willing to bet that the greens you’ve managed to hit in regulation will outweigh that scenario mightily. And that’s not to mention if you’d even have the skill to pull of that one spinny shot required every other round.

      I’m not guessing at this, i’ve experienced this over my 40+ years of playing. I know today’s equipment doesn’t spin the ball as much as days gone by (guys hitting 7-irons spinning it 5000 rpms and less is ludicrous enough). But hitting 180-yard shots isn’t where anyone is going to find these balls helping or hurting them — it’s those 150-yard shots and shorter that the results show up. I’ve seen too many guys unable to control their spin to believe that spinny urethane balls are the best option for everybody.

      There’s plenty of videos out there showing how the urethane balls still seem to work best for golfers around the green, but all you have to do is look at who’s sponsoring those vids. If the MGS guys really want me to believe their so-called results, they’ll do a real-world test with ionomer and urethane balls side-by-side in a round of golf and show which got the best results — and i’m not talking about “how much the ball spins” results, i’m talking about did it stay on the green, or did it stay close to the hole, or did it find the fairway, stuff like that. The one guy i saw on Youtube that did a test like this, pulled out a Pro V1 (or something like it) and compared it to some Top Flite made back in the 1990’s. It was a good idea, but a “Rock Flite” from the 1990’s does NOT compare to the ionomer balls made over the past 20 years.

      Looking forward to the results!

      Reply

      Damien

      1 year ago

      I’ve switched to Srixion Q star divides from supersofts. Far better around the greens and when I find them on sale they’re only a couple of bucks per dozen extra than a two piece. Great value ball IMO. Plus I like the divide look.

      Reply

      KOG

      1 year ago

      If you want to be surprised, try the Wilson Zip and the Precept Laddie X. Then even compare it at a sim to your gamer. The numbers are shockingly good and while they lack the spin of a low compression tour ball, they do everything very well and the Wilson Zip in particular is a soft ball that you dont lose much distance with. I have been playing the Wilson Zip all winter and Im playing some of the best golf of my life with it. I typically play pro-v and Im a 10 HC. The Pro-v is longer and checks up better, but for $1 a ball. These two are pretty legit esp if you’re a higher HC.

      Reply

      MikeB

      1 year ago

      I’m an 11.7 handicap. I’m also 77, so for me the difference in distance between higher compression balls and lower compression balls is negligible. I’m also a short game spin player, so I play urethane balls with lower compression than the $50+ urethane balls. My current goto ball is the Maxfli Tour S. I buy them when Golf Galaxy or Dick’s has a deal on them, so I’m typically paying around $25/dozen for a premium ball. If I couldn’t get the Maxflis, I would look for deals on Chrome Soft , and Bridgestone Tour B RXS balls. If I didn’t care about spin I would play one of the lower cost ionomer balls.

      Reply

      Loren Molever

      1 year ago

      I love the Vice balls…. Answer the online questions about your game, then pick from their line of options.

      Reply

      Barry Schwartz

      1 year ago

      I’m curious what the appeal is of a soft golf ball. If the testing shows it doesn’t fly further or spin more, why are do so many golfers like them? There are other balls in the price point that aren’t soft, so can the folks who play them illuminate me? For the record, I play a ProV1x as my standard ball.

      Reply

      Jim Gannarelli

      1 year ago

      I live on a CC in Arizona, slice side of a par 4. The worst golfers play Pro V’s. Next Callaway Chrome soft.

      Reply

      Loren

      1 year ago

      I have the same experience!

      Max

      1 year ago

      I play ChromeSoft. Can confirm

      JB

      1 year ago

      Soft balls, though lacking true control, aid the high capper in keeping the ball in play. They are far more forgiving. Ironically, these types, often attempting to smash the ball into oblivion and claiming to hit 300 yards at the range, struggle to achieve the same on a course with their standard 80 mph swing speed. Shocking.

      While understanding the equipment is crucial but is often overlooked, most high cappers neglect to invest sufficient time in self-education. If they did, their scores would improve.

      Reply

      KOG

      1 year ago

      Well said. The appeal of a soft ball is usually the feel off the putter for me. Many big stores use soft balls in their putter section. But as JB mentioned, the lack of workability that is built into the lower spin of a soft 2 piece, as well as the ability to compress the ball at a slower, more common clubspeed makes this type of ball more forgiving when mishit. When it comes to hard 2 piece, those are just distance balls and dont feel nice but are also less punishing on mishits. If you can make consistent contact, start playing those prov1x balls you find on the right treeline

      OpMan

      1 year ago

      Soft feels good. Doesn’t hurt. That’s why. 😂

      Reply

      Jeff Webb

      1 year ago

      Take a few walks in the woods on your local course, just a few times a month and you’ll have all the premium golf balls of your choice to play for the rest of the year.

      Barry Schwartz

      1 year ago

      That’s a new one for me. Never hit a golf ball that hurt.

      Golfzilla70

      1 year ago

      I don’t personally play the Titleist Velocity and Trufeel because they feel softer, i play them because they launch higher and spin LESS. Secondarily, they’re practically indestructible – you can bang these balls up on cart paths and trees and STILL get almost identical performance from tee to green. You can’t say that about urethane balls at all. Play 9 holes or even 18 holes with a Pro V1 and you’ll see some performance issues, primarily in distance.

      I feel about these ionomer balls compared to urethane the same way i feel about lob shots compared to an 8-iron chip-and-run: You’ll hit some pretty shots, but lobbing a ball in the hole is rare. Heck, lobbing a ball to even a 5′ circle is rare. But you’ll see plenty of running chips find the hole, or at least stay close to it, comparatively speaking. And there’s a reason for that, a chip-and-run is like a putt, and you don’t hardly ever want to see a ball check up in such a situation.

      And on that spin business, i can hit 150-yard shots from the fairway onto the green without ever worrying about whether or not the ball is going to spin backwards 20 or 30 feet. Can’t say that about a urethane ball, unless you’re a highly skilled golfer. And even THEN you see the pros on TV screw that up and spin a ball right off the green on just about every telecast. I just basically find myself hitting fewer greens with a urethane ball than i do with the ionomer balls. And that all by itself is reason enough for me, because i work for a living and have school-age kids at home to raise. Just not enough time to practice being good at controlling the spin of the ionomer balls.

      Reply

      Pete Stewart

      1 year ago

      I play the Callaway supersoft and prefer them over any titleist pro V ball. At my swing speed of 90 mph I have never seen any difference in distance and the supersofts feel better!

      Reply

      Mike T

      1 year ago

      I just saw an offer to by CLEAR balls for $25. These were the brainchild of a guy at my former NY club. Four piece, 85 – 90 ish compression, urethane cover. Originally a “subscription/exclusivity” proposition and about $75 a dozen.
      I doubt MGS ever tested these and I’m sure the inventory is a bit old. I’m trying for the heck of it. Not likely to see these again.

      Reply

      Bob

      1 year ago

      bobr3 you know guys one of the reasons why I don’t pay as much attention to my golf spy as I used to is because of the snarky attitudes that you guys seem to have not only online but also in no putts given. Not everyone that plays the game of golf can afford $50 a dozen golf balls and there’s more of us that can’t afford them then there are that can afford them get off your high horse would you please there’s more 20 handicap golfers in the United States than there are scratch golfers you need to remember that and sometimes I don’t think you do

      Reply

      Jimmy

      1 year ago

      Bad golf balls are bad no matter your skill level.

      Every good player I know plays premium balls. In my experience, the people who need it explained to them that Supersofts and Pinnacles are making them shoot higher scores are the 20+ cappers.

      Reply

      phil

      1 year ago

      No reason anyone on a budget can’t afford high performance balls. I shop on various used golf ball sites and play ProV’s, etc. for 30 % or more off the new price. I play mint(5a) , sometimes 4a. I currently play prov1, prov1x 2019 version. I bought three dozen each of mint5a for 28 dollars a dozen. I am 74 years old, a driver’s swing speed around 85-90. a 14 handicap, I have played a lot of balls, all the super soft stuff, and my observation is that I hit the Prov1 balls just as far as any ball designed for slower swing speeds. The extraordinary difference is with my short game and putting. I play tournaments during the summer. I played the Bridgestone E6 quite a few times as it is a fairway finder for me off the tee. But putting and approach shot is not the greatest. Using the provs changed that, the biggest reason I won my last tournament before knee surgery was using the 2019 prov1. Try the used golf ball, some of these performance balls are game changing. By the way, I think the 2019 prov1 and v1x are undervalued, a great vintage.

      Reply

      Golfzilla70

      1 year ago

      I 100% agree Bob. Listening to the podcast, and seeing some of the replies concerning this stuff, reminds me A LOT of some Ford Mustang forum where all the V8 guys ridicule the V6 owners and say they don’t own a “real” mustang.

      It’s utterly ridiculous, and i’d be willing to bet that 90% of the amateurs playing those performance balls, if they played a round of golf and hit both the urethane and the ionomer side-by-side, they’d see better results with the ionomer. And that’s primarily because 90% of the golfers tend to leave the ball short of the hole, or at the very least hook it and/or slice it off the tee. The ionomer balls curve less, and will roll forward almost every time.

      I know urethane balls CAN be better on chips (assuming your game is sharp enough to take advantage of it), but anything that helps you hit a green and stay AWAY from having to chip the ball is going to be a net positive to your final score.

      Reply

      bob

      1 year ago

      They also want you to subscribe to the ‘distance is king’ mantra off the tee and for approaches to long holes. Yep, sounds great except I would put a few thousand on Golf Sidekick to play any ball on any course with only a 2 iron, 5 iron, wedge and putter and beat either one of those guys on the No Putts Given podcast.

      Reply

      Papa Bogey

      1 year ago

      Please take a look at the Maxfli balls from Golf Galaxy. Especially the SoftFli and StraightFli. Currently selling for $50 for 4 dozen.

      Reply

      Ken

      1 year ago

      I have played all the premium balls, and after lots of testing, I consistently score better with super low compression balls. The Softfli at 35 compression is my current choice. Have shot within 3 shots of my age twice recently. (I’m 77)

      Reply

      Samir

      1 year ago

      Walmart had clearance of the Srixon soft feel in yellow for $9.50. Grabbed the last pack!

      Reply

      TacSKS

      1 year ago

      I’d really like to see the Maxfli Straightfli included in the test. Do they really fly straighter?

      Reply

      Fake

      1 year ago

      Fortunately, they are cheap enough to try out.

      Reply

      TacSKS

      1 year ago

      Yeah I definitely think they fly straighter and play them all the time, but what does the data say?

      Fake

      1 year ago

      Our local Target had a bunch of stuff discounted after the holidays. Wish I had been faster.

      Reply

      WYBob

      1 year ago

      Two points: 1) where are the MGS Ball Labs? The last one was 8/6/24, and the one before that was 5/5/24. Ball Lab was one of the more important and interesting components of MGS testing, and true to your core mission; 2) the robot ball test was always to establish the performace component of your ball evalutaions and should stay true to that focus. MGS has limited resourses and time to do the robot testing. Therefore it would seem counter intuitive to see any urethane performance balls excluded because of the inclusion of 2 piece ionomer balls. MGS golf ball testing were previously made up of 2 parts- Ball Lab (quality) + robot testing (performance) in order to provide a more comprehensive evaluation. Its that comprehensive evaluation where your true value to the consumer lies. Just scatter shots from the fringe.

      Reply

      Mark Davis

      1 year ago

      100% agreed. Give us the beautiful technicals, leave off the snark.

      Reply

      Don Nagle

      1 year ago

      I agree with Mark Davis, kind of disrespectful to the majority of the golf public, who don’t want to pay $60 dollars a dozen for golf balls. Give us the data and leave the elitist snark behind.

      Jimmy

      1 year ago

      Holy crap, you guys sure are sensitive. God forbid MGS gives it to us straight instead of pretending that these golf balls perform as well as urethane-covered options.

      OpMan

      1 year ago

      “a bit like laying claim to making the best gourmet CUP ramen” –
      there, I fixed it for you
      LMAO
      Ramen, if it’s a proper restaurant meal, with all the fixings, is quite nutritious

      Reply

      Shoekel

      1 year ago

      I like to find lost balls, (no water balls) during the winter months, I have found over 2500 balls this winter on 4 different courses. This year I would have to say that I have found over 250 Kirkland balls, by far the #1 (found lost ball). 2nd Supersoft, and 3rd some kind of Titleist ball. Out of those 3 ball brands I would over 40% where of these 3 brands.
      So, my non-scientific findings are golfers with either a slice or a hook play these balls.
      Which make me wonder, where was the Kirkland ball on this list?

      Reply

      Geno

      1 year ago

      You would think that with all the “smart” people they have in R&D and AI TaylorMade could come up with a better looking ball to put on the cover of their Speed Soft golf balls. The one in use looks like a ball that has been sitting in the mud at the bottom of a pond for a few years. Anyway I will stick with the Maxfli Tour x for now. I did just buy 2 dozen of the new Sam’s Club ball to see if they are any good. Must wait for the snow to melt here in Western NY before giving them a go.
      Peace

      Reply

      Phil Williamson

      1 year ago

      I’ve been playing the Snell Prime 2.0 this year. $104 for 5 dozen. Two piece with urethane cover. This one deserves to be in your ball testing.
      75 year old California golfer.
      Phil Williamson

      Reply

      Brian

      1 year ago

      As a senior I love playing the MG Ball (https://mggolf.com/golf-balls-mg-senior/p/GbMgX ). As a bonus the price is right! T

      Reply

      Spooky

      1 year ago

      I agree that the shade thrown at the less expensive 2 and 3 piece ionomer offerings seems counter-intuitive. If Consumer Reports only tested and offered analysis of exotic sports cars that most of us don’t drive and can’t afford, it wouldn’t be popular or practical. While I appreciate knowing the differences between tour level balls and what I normally play, knowing the differences between the Hyundai and the Ford is more useful than the Hyundai and the Porsche.

      Reply

      Fake

      1 year ago

      Other cheap balls that I find frequently (in rough order from
      most to least):

      Callaway Warbird
      Callaway Superhot
      TaylorMade Distance+
      Top Flite XL
      Wilson Chaos (usually for sale in a fish bowl at the register.)

      Reply

      Fake

      1 year ago

      Supersoft was the ball I started buying for myself when I started golfing again. Recognizable name and, at the time, $20/dozen. I didn’t know anything about spin, covers, or ball construction.

      Reply

      ArchieBunker

      1 year ago

      Playing Florida retirement country, the ball I’m most likely to find is a Nitro. Does Wal-Mart have a lock on this brand?

      Reply

      Dave

      1 year ago

      I still like the DTC Vice balls, either Pro or Pro Plus!

      Reply

      EBM

      1 year ago

      I buy Mint Titleist Tour Soft from recyclers not refurbishers, read your articles. Prices have risen to ~$1.50 per ball. No scuff marks, again an avid reader. I am old, 200 yd driver, max distance for my swing speed. Increased spin of Pro V1’s just enhance a poor swing. Admittedly the Maxfli’s are good price value. Standing over that Titleist, I know with my limited skills will get the most performance. Titleist quality is there one ball after another. Also that that ball will be available from recyclers due to Titleist market dominance. Eliminate the variables, control what you can.

      Reply

      DNow

      1 year ago

      I had sleeves of TruFeel and Tour Soft in a scramble swag bag. Tried each for a few holes. Man, are they inferior technology to tour balls. If you watch for sales, you won’t have any issue finding higher quality balls that dip into the price ranges cited here. No reason to compromise on the only piece of equipment you use for 70-80 shots per round.

      Reply

      Fake

      1 year ago

      Or a few more, if you’re me.

      Reply

      Mike

      1 year ago

      I find way more ProV1 than any other ball. Which tells me a lot of guys are playing the wrong ball! Titleist does a good job of brainwashing. Most golfers have more dollars than cents.

      Reply

      Tim Evans

      1 year ago

      Wright and Ditson should be in the mix.

      Reply

      Dan

      1 year ago

      Tony didn’t work very hard buddy. You understand the Max flies are one of the top rated balls by the ball testers, right?

      Reply

      Jelopster

      1 year ago

      Ah the noble Noodle. Hoping it makes the 2026 ball test!

      Reply

      Dan

      1 year ago

      Tony didn’t work very hard buddy. You understand the Max flies are one of the top rated balls by the ball testers, right?

      Reply

      Rob

      1 year ago

      I find way more Duo’s than any TaylorMade ball and more than SuperSofts as well.

      Reply

      Alan

      1 year ago

      The Sam’s Club Member’s Mark Pro Series 2 ball is a wonderful 3 piece urethane ball for $14/dozen. The data on my sim is nearly identical to a Maxfli Tour X or a ProV1X. The Sam’s ball appears to spin just a tiny bit more than those other two (maybe 200 additional rpms with 7 iron), which I like. After the initial testing, I purchased 4 dozen more.

      Reply

      geohogan

      1 year ago

      Urethane cover makes all the difference IMO.
      Snell has urethane cover and competitive price… winner.

      Reply

      Phill

      1 year ago

      My vote is for the Legato LTX3085. Great ball with great spin and distance.

      Reply

      Dave

      1 year ago

      For this level of golf ball, I expected to see the Golf Galaxy/Dicks Maxfli line. They are solid performering balls at about 2/3 the price of the ‘Major Brands” and easily available.

      Reply

      Bobby Melvin

      1 year ago

      Is the new 2025 Kirkland ball and the new Sam’s club ball going to be included in the 2025 Ball test ?

      Reply

      Fake

      1 year ago

      Seconded!

      Reply

      Guy Doon

      1 year ago

      I have to assume that Kirkland and DTC balls don’t have measured sales. Unscientifically, I find way more stray Kirkland balls than any other non-premier models.

      Reply

      Vito

      1 year ago

      Got to agree with you. Kirkland and Supersoft are the most I find in the weeds, the woods and the water. But I actually find as many Pro V’s and Callaway Chrome’s as the cheap balls, when I actually go looking…which is only when I’m waiting on slow players. Virtually all the former go in the shag bag. If the urethane balls aren’t damaged they get into my on course rotation.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply

    required
    required
    required (your email address will not be published)

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    News
    Jun 26, 2026
    3 “MyGolfSpy Approved” Golf Rangefinders On Sale
    Buyer's Guide
    Jun 25, 2026
    Do Slow Swing Speed Golfers Really Need A Draw-Biased Driver?
    News
    Jun 25, 2026
    Why Is No One Talking About This Golf Bag? I Tried it Out And Can’t Stop Blabbing About It